Skip to content

A Study of Mycophenolate Mofetil (CellCept) in Management of Patients With Lupus Nephritis.

A Prospective, Randomized, Active Controlled, Parallel Group, Multi-center Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) in Inducing Response and Maintaining Remission in Subjects With Lupus Nephritis.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00377637
Enrollment
370
Registered
2006-09-18
Start date
2005-07-31
Completion date
2010-03-31
Last updated
2011-12-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lupus Nephritis

Brief summary

This 2 arm study assessed the efficacy of Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF; CellCept) compared to cyclophosphamide in inducing a response in patients with lupus nephritis, and the long term efficacy of MMF compared to azathioprine in maintaining remission and renal function. Patients were randomized to receive either MMF (1.5 g twice daily \[bid\]) or cyclophosphamide (0.5-1.0 g/m\^2 in monthly pulses) in the induction phase. Those patients meeting criteria for response were re-randomized for entry into the maintenance phase, to receive either MMF (1 g bid) or azathioprine (2 mg/kg/day).

Interventions

DRUGMycophenolate mofetil (MMF)

Supplied as 500 mg tablets taken orally twice a day (BID). Dose specific for each arm. Dosing started at 500 mg BID for the first week, increasing by 500 mg in subsequent weeks until the final target dose was reached.

DRUGCyclophosphamide

Intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVC) was administered every four weeks (monthly) to a total of six infusions. Dosing was started at 0.75 g/m\^2 of body surface area for the first month, with subsequent doses at 0.5-1.0 g/m\^2. The target dose was 1.0 g/m\^2, but doses were titrated by 0.25 g/m\^2 increments to maintain nadir leukocyte count between 2500-4000/mm\^3.

DRUGAzathioprine

2 mg/kg/day orally, provided as 50 mg capsules to be taken after meals.

Placebo capsules matching Azathioprine taken orally once a day.

Placebo tablets matching Mycophenolate mofetil taken orally twice daily.

DRUGCorticosteroid

Oral prednisolone (or equivalent) starting at a dose of 0.75-1.0 mg/kg/day (maximum 60 mg/day) tapered to 10 mg/day.

Sponsors

Aspreva Pharmaceuticals
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* male or female patients, 12-75 years of age; * diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus; * kidney biopsy within 6 months of study, with histological diagnosis of lupus nephritis; * laboratory evidence of active nephritis.

Exclusion criteria

* continuous dialysis starting \>2 weeks before randomization into induction phase, and/or with an anticipated duration of \>8 weeks; * previous or planned kidney transplant; * other clinically significant active medical conditions.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Induction Phase: Number of Patients Showing Treatment Response24 weeksTreatment response was adjudicated by a blinded clinical endpoints committee (CEC) and defined as: a) Decrease in proteinuria, defined as a decrease in the urine protein to creatinine ratio (UPCr) to \<3 in subjects with baseline proteinuria ≥3 UPCr or a decrease in the UPCr by ≥50% in subjects with proteinuria \<3 UPCr at Baseline, and b) Stabilization of serum creatinine or improvement. UPCr were derived from the 24 hour urine collection. Patients who did not show a treatment response at Week 24 or who withdrew earlier than Week 24 were considered non-responders.
Maintenance Phase: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Treatment Failure Free, by Time IntervalFrom the start of the Maintenance Phase to Month 36Treatment Failure was adjudicated by a clinical endpoints committee and was defined as the time to the earliest occurrence of any one of the following: death, end stage renal disease, sustained doubling of serum creatinine, renal flare, or a requirement for rescue therapy for exacerbation or deterioration of Lupus nephritis. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were estimated from the observed time to treatment failure for each patient. The data presented are the percentage of participants who were treatment-failure free at each time interval as estimated by Kaplan-Meier.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Induction Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 24 in 24-hour Urine ProteinBaseline, Week 2424-hour urine protein was measured at Baseline and Week 24.
Induction Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum AlbuminBaseline, Week 24
Induction Phase: Change in Renal British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) ScoreBaseline, 24 weeksBILAG indices provide a scoring system for the assessment of lupus disease activity in terms of the need for steroid treatment in 8 organs/systems. Eighty-six items were scored resulting in a classification of A (severe activity), B (moderate activity), C (mild activity), D (no current activity) and E (no activity ever observed) for each organ system. The BILAG individual system summaries were calculated by a program supplied by ADS-Limathon (Sheffield, UK). The score at baseline was compared to the score at the 24 week endpoint for each treatment group, reported here for the renal system.
Induction Phase: Change From Baseline in Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain and Component ScoresBaseline and 24 weeksThe SF-36 is a 36 item quality of life questionnaire. The short-form version has eleven questions that permit the participant to rate how they feel that particular day. The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores and two component scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 score with the higher scores indicating better quality of life.
Maintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Number of DeathsFrom the start of the Maintenance Phase to Month 36Treatment Failure was adjudicated by a clinical endpoints committee (CEC) and was defined as the time to the earliest occurrence of any one of the following: death, end stage renal disease, sustained doubling of serum creatinine, renal flare, or a requirement for rescue therapy for exacerbation or deterioration of Lupus nephritis (LN).
Induction Phase: Number of Participants Achieving Complete Remission24 weeksNumber of participants achieving complete remission as defined by return to normal serum creatinine, proteinuria ≤500 mg/24 hours and an inactive urinary sediment (absence of red blood cells, white blood cells or cellular or granular casts) after 24 weeks.
Maintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Number of Participants With Sustained Doubling of Serum CreatinineFrom the start of the Maintenance Phase to Month 36Sustained doubling of serum creatinine concentration is defined as the first serum creatinine value that is twice the mean of the lowest 2 values from screening to end of induction, as confirmed by a second serum creatinine value obtained at least 4 weeks after the initial doubling.
Maintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Renal Flare Free, by Time IntervalFrom the start of the Maintenance Phase to Month 36A proteinuric flare is defined as a doubling of the urine protein:creatinine ratio, and proteinuria ≥1 g/24 h in patients with urine protein ≤0.5 g/24 h at the end of the induction phase, or proteinuria ≥2 g/24 h if urine protein was \>0.5 g/24 h at the end of the induction phase. A nephritic flare is defined as a 25% increase in serum creatinine accompanied by 1 or more of the following: (a) simultaneous doubling of the proteinuria reaching a minimum of 2 g/24 h (b) new/increased hematuria or (c) the appearance of cellular casts. All flares were adjudicated by a clinical endpoints committee.
Maintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Not Receiving Rescue TherapyFrom the start of the Maintenance Phase to Month 36The primary efficacy parameter was the time to treatment failure, adjudicated by the Clinical Endpoints Committee (CEC), defined as any of the following: death, end stage renal disease, sustained doubling of serum creatinine, renal flare, or requirement for rescue therapy to treat deterioration or exacerbation of Lupus nephritis. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were estimated from the observed time to rescue treatment for each patient. The data presented are the percentage of participants who were rescue treatment free at each time interval as estimated by Kaplan-Meier.
Maintenance Phase: Participants With Major Extra-renal FlareFrom the start of the Maintenance Phase to Month 36A major extra-renal flare is defined as a British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) Score category A in one extrarenal organ or three organs with concurrent category B scores. BILAG indices provide a scoring system for the assessment of lupus disease activity in terms of the need for steroid treatment in 8 organs/systems. Eighty-six items were scored resulting in a classification of A (severe activity), B (moderate activity), C (mild activity), D (no current activity) and E (no activity ever observed) for each organ system.
Maintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Number of Participants With End-stage Renal Disease (ESRD)From the start of the Maintenance Phase to Month 36Time to treatment failure, adjudicated by the Clinical Endpoints Committee (CEC), was defined as any 1 the following: death, ESRD, sustained doubling of serum creatinine, renal flare (proteinuric or nephritic), or requirement for rescue therapy to treat deterioration or exacerbation of Lupus nephritis. ESRD is defined as progression to chronic hemodialysis or renal transplant.
Induction Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum CreatinineBaseline, Week 24

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, Czechia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Mexico, Portugal, Spain, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The induction phase was a prospective, randomized, open-label, active controlled, parallel group, international multicenter, 2-arm comparison study of MMF versus IVC in inducing a response in patients with Lupus nephritis. Responders in the induction phase were re-randomized into a double-blind, double-dummy, active controlled Maintenance Phase.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Induction Phase: Cyclophosphamide
Participants received monthly intravenous infusions of cyclophosphamide, 0.5 to 1.0 g per square meter of body surface area and concomitant treatment with corticosteroids for the 24 week Induction Phase.
185
Induction Phase: Mycophenolate Mofetil
Participants received oral mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 1.5 g twice a day and concomitant corticosteroids for the 24-weeks of the Induction Phase.
185
Maintenance Phase: Mycophenolate Mofetil
Participants who responded to Induction Phase treatment received mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 1.0 g orally twice a day, placebo to azathioprine orally once a day and corticosteroid for the 36 weeks Maintenance Phase.
116
Maintenance Phase: Azathioprine
Participants who responded to Induction Phase treatment received azathioprine (AZA) 2 mg/kg/day orally once a day, placebo to mycophenolate mofetil orally twice a day and corticosteroid for the 36 weeks Maintenance Phase.
111
Total597

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Induction PhaseAdverse Event122100
Induction PhaseDeath1300
Induction PhaseDeterioration/serum creatinine2000
Induction PhaseDose reduction of MMF < 2 g/day for 14 d0100
Induction PhaseLost to Follow-up2100
Induction PhaseNon-Compliance1000
Induction PhasePhysician Decision3100
Induction PhaseReason for withdrawal is not noted2000
Induction PhaseSponsor decision1200
Induction PhaseWithdrawal by Subject5600
Maintenance PhaseAdverse Event002943
Maintenance PhaseDeath0001
Maintenance PhaseLost to Follow-up0031
Maintenance PhaseNon-compliance0011
Maintenance PhasePhysician Decision0054
Maintenance PhaseSponsor decision0023
Maintenance PhaseStudy medication stopped > 14 days0001
Maintenance PhaseWithdrawal by Subject0033

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicInduction Phase: CyclophosphamideInduction Phase: Mycophenolate MofetilMaintenance Phase: Mycophenolate MofetilMaintenance Phase: AzathioprineTotal
Age, Customized
Induction Phase
31.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.25
32.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7
NA yearsNA years31.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.72
Age, Customized
Maintenance Phase
NA yearsNA years31.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.59
31.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.77
31.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.65
Sex/Gender, Customized
Induction Phase - Female
156 Participants157 Participants0 Participants0 Participants313 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Induction Phase - Male
29 Participants28 Participants0 Participants0 Participants57 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Maintenance Phase - Female
0 Participants0 Participants99 Participants96 Participants195 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Maintenance Phase - Male
0 Participants0 Participants17 Participants15 Participants32 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
171 / 180177 / 184113 / 115108 / 111
serious
Total, serious adverse events
41 / 18051 / 18427 / 11537 / 111

Outcome results

Primary

Induction Phase: Number of Patients Showing Treatment Response

Treatment response was adjudicated by a blinded clinical endpoints committee (CEC) and defined as: a) Decrease in proteinuria, defined as a decrease in the urine protein to creatinine ratio (UPCr) to \<3 in subjects with baseline proteinuria ≥3 UPCr or a decrease in the UPCr by ≥50% in subjects with proteinuria \<3 UPCr at Baseline, and b) Stabilization of serum creatinine or improvement. UPCr were derived from the 24 hour urine collection. Patients who did not show a treatment response at Week 24 or who withdrew earlier than Week 24 were considered non-responders.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: Analysis population was intent to treat which comprised all subjects who were randomized into the study and had at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Intravenous CyclophosphamideInduction Phase: Number of Patients Showing Treatment ResponseResponder98 participants
Intravenous CyclophosphamideInduction Phase: Number of Patients Showing Treatment ResponseNon-responder87 participants
Mycophenolate MofetilInduction Phase: Number of Patients Showing Treatment ResponseResponder104 participants
Mycophenolate MofetilInduction Phase: Number of Patients Showing Treatment ResponseNon-responder81 participants
p-value: 0.478Regression, Logistic
Primary

Maintenance Phase: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Treatment Failure Free, by Time Interval

Treatment Failure was adjudicated by a clinical endpoints committee and was defined as the time to the earliest occurrence of any one of the following: death, end stage renal disease, sustained doubling of serum creatinine, renal flare, or a requirement for rescue therapy for exacerbation or deterioration of Lupus nephritis. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were estimated from the observed time to treatment failure for each patient. The data presented are the percentage of participants who were treatment-failure free at each time interval as estimated by Kaplan-Meier.

Time frame: From the start of the Maintenance Phase to Month 36

Population: Intent to treat analysis population which consisted of all subjects who were randomized to the maintenance phase of the study and had at least 1 maintenance efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Intravenous CyclophosphamideMaintenance Phase: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Treatment Failure Free, by Time IntervalStart of Maintenance Phase to Month 398.2 Percentage of participants
Intravenous CyclophosphamideMaintenance Phase: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Treatment Failure Free, by Time IntervalMonth 3 to Month 693.7 Percentage of participants
Intravenous CyclophosphamideMaintenance Phase: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Treatment Failure Free, by Time IntervalMonth 6 to Month 989.9 Percentage of participants
Intravenous CyclophosphamideMaintenance Phase: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Treatment Failure Free, by Time IntervalMonth 9 to Month 1286.0 Percentage of participants
Intravenous CyclophosphamideMaintenance Phase: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Treatment Failure Free, by Time IntervalMonth 12 to Month 1586.0 Percentage of participants
Intravenous CyclophosphamideMaintenance Phase: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Treatment Failure Free, by Time IntervalMonth 15 to Month 1884.9 Percentage of participants
Intravenous CyclophosphamideMaintenance Phase: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Treatment Failure Free, by Time IntervalMonth 18 to Month 2184.9 Percentage of participants
Intravenous CyclophosphamideMaintenance Phase: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Treatment Failure Free, by Time IntervalMonth 21 to Month 2483.9 Percentage of participants
Intravenous CyclophosphamideMaintenance Phase: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Treatment Failure Free, by Time IntervalMonth 24 to Month 2782.8 Percentage of participants
Intravenous CyclophosphamideMaintenance Phase: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Treatment Failure Free, by Time IntervalMonth 27 to Month 3082.8 Percentage of participants
Intravenous CyclophosphamideMaintenance Phase: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Treatment Failure Free, by Time IntervalMonth 30 to Month 3381.7 Percentage of participants
Intravenous CyclophosphamideMaintenance Phase: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Treatment Failure Free, by Time IntervalMonth 33 to Month 3681.7 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilMaintenance Phase: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Treatment Failure Free, by Time IntervalMonth 30 to Month 3363.4 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilMaintenance Phase: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Treatment Failure Free, by Time IntervalStart of Maintenance Phase to Month 397.2 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilMaintenance Phase: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Treatment Failure Free, by Time IntervalMonth 18 to Month 2170.7 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilMaintenance Phase: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Treatment Failure Free, by Time IntervalMonth 3 to Month 689.3 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilMaintenance Phase: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Treatment Failure Free, by Time IntervalMonth 27 to Month 3065.9 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilMaintenance Phase: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Treatment Failure Free, by Time IntervalMonth 6 to Month 986.2 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilMaintenance Phase: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Treatment Failure Free, by Time IntervalMonth 21 to Month 2468.3 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilMaintenance Phase: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Treatment Failure Free, by Time IntervalMonth 9 to Month 1283.0 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilMaintenance Phase: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Treatment Failure Free, by Time IntervalMonth 33 to Month 3658.6 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilMaintenance Phase: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Treatment Failure Free, by Time IntervalMonth 12 to Month 1577.5 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilMaintenance Phase: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Treatment Failure Free, by Time IntervalMonth 24 to Month 2767.1 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilMaintenance Phase: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Treatment Failure Free, by Time IntervalMonth 15 to Month 1874.1 Percentage of participants
Comparison: The difference in Kaplan-Meier survival curves between treatment groups (MMF-AZA) was assessed using a log-rank test, which is a non-parametric test to compare the survival distributions of two groups commonly used to analyze time-to-event endpoints.p-value: 0.003Log Rank
Secondary

Induction Phase: Change From Baseline in Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain and Component Scores

The SF-36 is a 36 item quality of life questionnaire. The short-form version has eleven questions that permit the participant to rate how they feel that particular day. The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores and two component scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 score with the higher scores indicating better quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline and 24 weeks

Population: This analysis population is intention to treat. The analysis included only those patients for whom data was available at both time points, as indicated by n.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intravenous CyclophosphamideInduction Phase: Change From Baseline in Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain and Component ScoresBodily Pain Score [n=141, 137]16.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.85
Intravenous CyclophosphamideInduction Phase: Change From Baseline in Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain and Component ScoresMental Component Summary [n=139, 137]5.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.39
Intravenous CyclophosphamideInduction Phase: Change From Baseline in Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain and Component ScoresRole-Emotional Score [n=141, 137]18.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 46.71
Intravenous CyclophosphamideInduction Phase: Change From Baseline in Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain and Component ScoresGeneral Health Score [n=139, 137]11.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.9
Intravenous CyclophosphamideInduction Phase: Change From Baseline in Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain and Component ScoresRole-Physical Score [n=141, 137]34.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 47.65
Intravenous CyclophosphamideInduction Phase: Change From Baseline in Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain and Component ScoresPhysical Component Summary [n=139, 137]6.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.74
Intravenous CyclophosphamideInduction Phase: Change From Baseline in Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain and Component ScoresSocial Function Score [n=141, 137]18.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.26
Intravenous CyclophosphamideInduction Phase: Change From Baseline in Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain and Component ScoresMental Health Score [n=141, 137]9.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.47
Intravenous CyclophosphamideInduction Phase: Change From Baseline in Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain and Component ScoresVitality Score [n=141, 137]11.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.68
Intravenous CyclophosphamideInduction Phase: Change From Baseline in Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain and Component ScoresPhysical functioning Score [n=141, 137]9.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.63
Mycophenolate MofetilInduction Phase: Change From Baseline in Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain and Component ScoresVitality Score [n=141, 137]14.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.3
Mycophenolate MofetilInduction Phase: Change From Baseline in Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain and Component ScoresPhysical Component Summary [n=139, 137]5.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.6
Mycophenolate MofetilInduction Phase: Change From Baseline in Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain and Component ScoresMental Component Summary [n=139, 137]6.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.45
Mycophenolate MofetilInduction Phase: Change From Baseline in Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain and Component ScoresBodily Pain Score [n=141, 137]13.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.57
Mycophenolate MofetilInduction Phase: Change From Baseline in Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain and Component ScoresGeneral Health Score [n=139, 137]9.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.49
Mycophenolate MofetilInduction Phase: Change From Baseline in Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain and Component ScoresMental Health Score [n=141, 137]9.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.96
Mycophenolate MofetilInduction Phase: Change From Baseline in Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain and Component ScoresPhysical functioning Score [n=141, 137]11.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.12
Mycophenolate MofetilInduction Phase: Change From Baseline in Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain and Component ScoresRole-Emotional Score [n=141, 137]23.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 44.9
Mycophenolate MofetilInduction Phase: Change From Baseline in Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain and Component ScoresRole-Physical Score [n=141, 137]28.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 48.18
Mycophenolate MofetilInduction Phase: Change From Baseline in Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain and Component ScoresSocial Function Score [n=141, 137]17.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.06
Secondary

Induction Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 24 in 24-hour Urine Protein

24-hour urine protein was measured at Baseline and Week 24.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Analysis population was intent to treat. The analysis included only those patients for whom data was available at both time points, as indicated by n.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intravenous CyclophosphamideInduction Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 24 in 24-hour Urine ProteinBaseline [n=180, 180]4451.4 mg/dayStandard Deviation 3506.59
Intravenous CyclophosphamideInduction Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 24 in 24-hour Urine ProteinWeek 24 [n= 150, 144]1831.6 mg/dayStandard Deviation 2413.84
Intravenous CyclophosphamideInduction Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 24 in 24-hour Urine ProteinChange from Baseline to Week 24 [n= 146, 142]-2513.7 mg/dayStandard Deviation 3223.68
Mycophenolate MofetilInduction Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 24 in 24-hour Urine ProteinBaseline [n=180, 180]4208.9 mg/dayStandard Deviation 3347.34
Mycophenolate MofetilInduction Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 24 in 24-hour Urine ProteinWeek 24 [n= 150, 144]1599.0 mg/dayStandard Deviation 2165.8
Mycophenolate MofetilInduction Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 24 in 24-hour Urine ProteinChange from Baseline to Week 24 [n= 146, 142]-2510.6 mg/dayStandard Deviation 3132.69
Secondary

Induction Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum Albumin

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Analysis population was intent to treat. The analysis included only those patients for whom data was available at both time points, as indicated by n.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intravenous CyclophosphamideInduction Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum AlbuminBaseline [n=184, 185]28.6 g/LStandard Deviation 6.98
Intravenous CyclophosphamideInduction Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum AlbuminWeek 24 [n=155, 151]38.3 g/LStandard Deviation 6.16
Intravenous CyclophosphamideInduction Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum AlbuminChange from Baseline to Week 24 [n=154, 151]9.0 g/LStandard Deviation 6.77
Mycophenolate MofetilInduction Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum AlbuminBaseline [n=184, 185]30.5 g/LStandard Deviation 6.9
Mycophenolate MofetilInduction Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum AlbuminWeek 24 [n=155, 151]38.4 g/LStandard Deviation 5.5
Mycophenolate MofetilInduction Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum AlbuminChange from Baseline to Week 24 [n=154, 151]7.5 g/LStandard Deviation 6.25
Secondary

Induction Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum Creatinine

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Analysis population was intent to treat. The analysis included only those patients for whom data was available at both time points, as indicated by n.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intravenous CyclophosphamideInduction Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum CreatinineBaseline [n= 184, 185]92.7 µmol/LStandard Deviation 56.88
Intravenous CyclophosphamideInduction Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum CreatinineWeek 24 [n= 155, 151]83.5 µmol/LStandard Deviation 56.26
Intravenous CyclophosphamideInduction Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum CreatinineChange from Baseline to Week 24 [n= 154, 151]-5.1 µmol/LStandard Deviation 45.96
Mycophenolate MofetilInduction Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum CreatinineBaseline [n= 184, 185]108.6 µmol/LStandard Deviation 97.21
Mycophenolate MofetilInduction Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum CreatinineWeek 24 [n= 155, 151]77.6 µmol/LStandard Deviation 35.08
Mycophenolate MofetilInduction Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum CreatinineChange from Baseline to Week 24 [n= 154, 151]-18.9 µmol/LStandard Deviation 59.03
Secondary

Induction Phase: Change in Renal British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) Score

BILAG indices provide a scoring system for the assessment of lupus disease activity in terms of the need for steroid treatment in 8 organs/systems. Eighty-six items were scored resulting in a classification of A (severe activity), B (moderate activity), C (mild activity), D (no current activity) and E (no activity ever observed) for each organ system. The BILAG individual system summaries were calculated by a program supplied by ADS-Limathon (Sheffield, UK). The score at baseline was compared to the score at the 24 week endpoint for each treatment group, reported here for the renal system.

Time frame: Baseline, 24 weeks

Population: Analysis population was intent to treat. The endpoint was defined using the last observation carried forward approach. If no post-Baseline value was available, endpoint was considered missing.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Intravenous CyclophosphamideInduction Phase: Change in Renal British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) ScoreShift from Baseline=B to 24 Week Endpoint=D0.0 Percentage of participants
Intravenous CyclophosphamideInduction Phase: Change in Renal British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) ScoreShift from Baseline=A to 24 Week Endpoint=A27.1 Percentage of participants
Intravenous CyclophosphamideInduction Phase: Change in Renal British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) ScoreShift from Baseline=C to 24 Week Endpoint=A0.0 Percentage of participants
Intravenous CyclophosphamideInduction Phase: Change in Renal British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) ScoreShift from Baseline=A to 24 Week Endpoint=D9.4 Percentage of participants
Intravenous CyclophosphamideInduction Phase: Change in Renal British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) ScoreShift from Baseline=C to 24 Week Endpoint=B0.6 Percentage of participants
Intravenous CyclophosphamideInduction Phase: Change in Renal British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) ScoreShift from Baseline=B to 24 Week Endpoint=A0.0 Percentage of participants
Intravenous CyclophosphamideInduction Phase: Change in Renal British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) ScoreShift from Baseline=C to 24 Week Endpoint=C0.0 Percentage of participants
Intravenous CyclophosphamideInduction Phase: Change in Renal British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) ScoreShift from Baseline=A to 24 Week Endpoint=B34.8 Percentage of participants
Intravenous CyclophosphamideInduction Phase: Change in Renal British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) ScoreShift from Baseline=C to 24 Week Endpoint=D0.0 Percentage of participants
Intravenous CyclophosphamideInduction Phase: Change in Renal British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) ScoreShift from Baseline=D to 24 Week Endpoint=A0.0 Percentage of participants
Intravenous CyclophosphamideInduction Phase: Change in Renal British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) ScoreShift from Baseline=B to 24 Week Endpoint=B1.1 Percentage of participants
Intravenous CyclophosphamideInduction Phase: Change in Renal British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) ScoreShift from Baseline=D to 24 Week Endpoint=B0.0 Percentage of participants
Intravenous CyclophosphamideInduction Phase: Change in Renal British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) ScoreShift from Baseline=A to 24 Week Endpoint=C24.9 Percentage of participants
Intravenous CyclophosphamideInduction Phase: Change in Renal British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) ScoreShift from Baseline=D to 24 Week Endpoint=C0.6 Percentage of participants
Intravenous CyclophosphamideInduction Phase: Change in Renal British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) ScoreShift from Baseline=D to 24 Week Endpoint=D0.0 Percentage of participants
Intravenous CyclophosphamideInduction Phase: Change in Renal British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) ScoreShift from Baseline=B to 24 Week Endpoint=C1.7 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilInduction Phase: Change in Renal British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) ScoreShift from Baseline=D to 24 Week Endpoint=D0.0 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilInduction Phase: Change in Renal British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) ScoreShift from Baseline=B to 24 Week Endpoint=C2.2 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilInduction Phase: Change in Renal British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) ScoreShift from Baseline=C to 24 Week Endpoint=D0.0 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilInduction Phase: Change in Renal British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) ScoreShift from Baseline=D to 24 Week Endpoint=C0.0 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilInduction Phase: Change in Renal British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) ScoreShift from Baseline=A to 24 Week Endpoint=A17.1 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilInduction Phase: Change in Renal British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) ScoreShift from Baseline=A to 24 Week Endpoint=C33.1 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilInduction Phase: Change in Renal British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) ScoreShift from Baseline=A to 24 Week Endpoint=D5.5 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilInduction Phase: Change in Renal British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) ScoreShift from Baseline=B to 24 Week Endpoint=A0.0 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilInduction Phase: Change in Renal British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) ScoreShift from Baseline=B to 24 Week Endpoint=B1.7 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilInduction Phase: Change in Renal British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) ScoreShift from Baseline=B to 24 Week Endpoint=D1.1 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilInduction Phase: Change in Renal British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) ScoreShift from Baseline=C to 24 Week Endpoint=A0.0 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilInduction Phase: Change in Renal British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) ScoreShift from Baseline=C to 24 Week Endpoint=B0.0 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilInduction Phase: Change in Renal British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) ScoreShift from Baseline=C to 24 Week Endpoint=C0.0 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilInduction Phase: Change in Renal British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) ScoreShift from Baseline=D to 24 Week Endpoint=A0.0 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilInduction Phase: Change in Renal British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) ScoreShift from Baseline=D to 24 Week Endpoint=B0.0 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilInduction Phase: Change in Renal British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) ScoreShift from Baseline=A to 24 Week Endpoint=B39.2 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Induction Phase: Number of Participants Achieving Complete Remission

Number of participants achieving complete remission as defined by return to normal serum creatinine, proteinuria ≤500 mg/24 hours and an inactive urinary sediment (absence of red blood cells, white blood cells or cellular or granular casts) after 24 weeks.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: Analysis population was intent to treat.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Intravenous CyclophosphamideInduction Phase: Number of Participants Achieving Complete RemissionComplete Remission - Yes15 participants
Intravenous CyclophosphamideInduction Phase: Number of Participants Achieving Complete RemissionComplete Remission - No170 participants
Mycophenolate MofetilInduction Phase: Number of Participants Achieving Complete RemissionComplete Remission - Yes16 participants
Mycophenolate MofetilInduction Phase: Number of Participants Achieving Complete RemissionComplete Remission - No169 participants
Secondary

Maintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Not Receiving Rescue Therapy

The primary efficacy parameter was the time to treatment failure, adjudicated by the Clinical Endpoints Committee (CEC), defined as any of the following: death, end stage renal disease, sustained doubling of serum creatinine, renal flare, or requirement for rescue therapy to treat deterioration or exacerbation of Lupus nephritis. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were estimated from the observed time to rescue treatment for each patient. The data presented are the percentage of participants who were rescue treatment free at each time interval as estimated by Kaplan-Meier.

Time frame: From the start of the Maintenance Phase to Month 36

Population: Maintenance Phase intent to treat population. The analysis includes all event data, regardless of whether or not the event was the earliest Clinical Endpoints Committee-adjudicated reason for treatment failure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Intravenous CyclophosphamideMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Not Receiving Rescue TherapyStart of Maintenance Phase to Month 3100 Percentage of participants
Intravenous CyclophosphamideMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Not Receiving Rescue TherapyMonth 3 to Month 698.2 Percentage of participants
Intravenous CyclophosphamideMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Not Receiving Rescue TherapyMonth 6 to Month 997.2 Percentage of participants
Intravenous CyclophosphamideMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Not Receiving Rescue TherapyMonth 9 to Month 1294.2 Percentage of participants
Intravenous CyclophosphamideMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Not Receiving Rescue TherapyMonth 12 to Month 1594.2 Percentage of participants
Intravenous CyclophosphamideMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Not Receiving Rescue TherapyMonth 15 to Month 1894.2 Percentage of participants
Intravenous CyclophosphamideMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Not Receiving Rescue TherapyMonth 18 to Month 2193.1 Percentage of participants
Intravenous CyclophosphamideMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Not Receiving Rescue TherapyMonth 21 to Month 2491.9 Percentage of participants
Intravenous CyclophosphamideMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Not Receiving Rescue TherapyMonth 24 to Month 2790.8 Percentage of participants
Intravenous CyclophosphamideMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Not Receiving Rescue TherapyMonth 27 to Month 3090.8 Percentage of participants
Intravenous CyclophosphamideMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Not Receiving Rescue TherapyMonth 30 to Month 3390.8 Percentage of participants
Intravenous CyclophosphamideMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Not Receiving Rescue TherapyMonth 33 to Month 3690.8 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Not Receiving Rescue TherapyMonth 15 to Month 1887.1 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Not Receiving Rescue TherapyMonth 33 to Month 3675.9 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Not Receiving Rescue TherapyStart of Maintenance Phase to Month 399.1 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Not Receiving Rescue TherapyMonth 24 to Month 2781.7 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Not Receiving Rescue TherapyMonth 3 to Month 695.1 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Not Receiving Rescue TherapyMonth 18 to Month 2183.1 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Not Receiving Rescue TherapyMonth 6 to Month 993.0 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Not Receiving Rescue TherapyMonth 30 to Month 3378.8 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Not Receiving Rescue TherapyMonth 9 to Month 1291.9 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Not Receiving Rescue TherapyMonth 21 to Month 2483.1 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Not Receiving Rescue TherapyMonth 12 to Month 1588.4 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Not Receiving Rescue TherapyMonth 27 to Month 3080.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Maintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Renal Flare Free, by Time Interval

A proteinuric flare is defined as a doubling of the urine protein:creatinine ratio, and proteinuria ≥1 g/24 h in patients with urine protein ≤0.5 g/24 h at the end of the induction phase, or proteinuria ≥2 g/24 h if urine protein was \>0.5 g/24 h at the end of the induction phase. A nephritic flare is defined as a 25% increase in serum creatinine accompanied by 1 or more of the following: (a) simultaneous doubling of the proteinuria reaching a minimum of 2 g/24 h (b) new/increased hematuria or (c) the appearance of cellular casts. All flares were adjudicated by a clinical endpoints committee.

Time frame: From the start of the Maintenance Phase to Month 36

Population: Maintenance Phase intent to treat population. The analysis includes all event data, regardless of whether or not the event was the earliest Clinical Endpoints Committee-adjudicated reason for treatment failure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Intravenous CyclophosphamideMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Renal Flare Free, by Time IntervalMonth 6 to Month 990.8 Percentage of participants
Intravenous CyclophosphamideMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Renal Flare Free, by Time IntervalMonth 18 to Month 2186.8 Percentage of participants
Intravenous CyclophosphamideMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Renal Flare Free, by Time IntervalMonth 21 to Month 2486.8 Percentage of participants
Intravenous CyclophosphamideMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Renal Flare Free, by Time IntervalMonth 9 to Month 1287.8 Percentage of participants
Intravenous CyclophosphamideMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Renal Flare Free, by Time IntervalMonth 24 to Month 2786.8 Percentage of participants
Intravenous CyclophosphamideMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Renal Flare Free, by Time IntervalStart of Maintenance Phase to Month 398.2 Percentage of participants
Intravenous CyclophosphamideMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Renal Flare Free, by Time IntervalMonth 27 to Month 3086.8 Percentage of participants
Intravenous CyclophosphamideMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Renal Flare Free, by Time IntervalMonth 12 to Month 1587.8 Percentage of participants
Intravenous CyclophosphamideMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Renal Flare Free, by Time IntervalMonth 30 to Month 3385.6 Percentage of participants
Intravenous CyclophosphamideMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Renal Flare Free, by Time IntervalMonth 15 to Month 1886.8 Percentage of participants
Intravenous CyclophosphamideMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Renal Flare Free, by Time IntervalMonth 33 to Month 3685.6 Percentage of participants
Intravenous CyclophosphamideMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Renal Flare Free, by Time IntervalMonth 3 to Month 694.6 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Renal Flare Free, by Time IntervalMonth 33 to Month 3670.1 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Renal Flare Free, by Time IntervalMonth 12 to Month 1582.8 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Renal Flare Free, by Time IntervalStart of Maintenance Phase to Month 397.2 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Renal Flare Free, by Time IntervalMonth 3 to Month 690.3 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Renal Flare Free, by Time IntervalMonth 6 to Month 987.2 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Renal Flare Free, by Time IntervalMonth 9 to Month 1285.0 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Renal Flare Free, by Time IntervalMonth 15 to Month 1879.2 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Renal Flare Free, by Time IntervalMonth 18 to Month 2178.0 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Renal Flare Free, by Time IntervalMonth 21 to Month 2475.5 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Renal Flare Free, by Time IntervalMonth 24 to Month 2774.2 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Renal Flare Free, by Time IntervalMonth 27 to Month 3074.2 Percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Renal Flare Free, by Time IntervalMonth 30 to Month 3372.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Maintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Number of Deaths

Treatment Failure was adjudicated by a clinical endpoints committee (CEC) and was defined as the time to the earliest occurrence of any one of the following: death, end stage renal disease, sustained doubling of serum creatinine, renal flare, or a requirement for rescue therapy for exacerbation or deterioration of Lupus nephritis (LN).

Time frame: From the start of the Maintenance Phase to Month 36

Population: Maintenance Phase intent to treat population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intravenous CyclophosphamideMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Number of Deaths0 Deaths
Mycophenolate MofetilMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Number of Deaths1 Deaths
Secondary

Maintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Number of Participants With End-stage Renal Disease (ESRD)

Time to treatment failure, adjudicated by the Clinical Endpoints Committee (CEC), was defined as any 1 the following: death, ESRD, sustained doubling of serum creatinine, renal flare (proteinuric or nephritic), or requirement for rescue therapy to treat deterioration or exacerbation of Lupus nephritis. ESRD is defined as progression to chronic hemodialysis or renal transplant.

Time frame: From the start of the Maintenance Phase to Month 36

Population: Maintenance Phase intent to treat population. The analysis includes all event data, regardless of whether or not the event was the earliest Clinical Endpoints Committee-adjudicated reason for treatment failure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intravenous CyclophosphamideMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Number of Participants With End-stage Renal Disease (ESRD)0 participants
Mycophenolate MofetilMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Number of Participants With End-stage Renal Disease (ESRD)3 participants
Secondary

Maintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Number of Participants With Sustained Doubling of Serum Creatinine

Sustained doubling of serum creatinine concentration is defined as the first serum creatinine value that is twice the mean of the lowest 2 values from screening to end of induction, as confirmed by a second serum creatinine value obtained at least 4 weeks after the initial doubling.

Time frame: From the start of the Maintenance Phase to Month 36

Population: Maintenance Phase intent to treat population. The analysis includes all event data, regardless of whether or not the event was the earliest Clinical Endpoints Committee-adjudicated reason for treatment failure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intravenous CyclophosphamideMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Number of Participants With Sustained Doubling of Serum Creatinine1 participants
Mycophenolate MofetilMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Number of Participants With Sustained Doubling of Serum Creatinine5 participants
Secondary

Maintenance Phase: Participants With Major Extra-renal Flare

A major extra-renal flare is defined as a British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) Score category A in one extrarenal organ or three organs with concurrent category B scores. BILAG indices provide a scoring system for the assessment of lupus disease activity in terms of the need for steroid treatment in 8 organs/systems. Eighty-six items were scored resulting in a classification of A (severe activity), B (moderate activity), C (mild activity), D (no current activity) and E (no activity ever observed) for each organ system.

Time frame: From the start of the Maintenance Phase to Month 36

Population: Maintenance Phase intent to treat population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intravenous CyclophosphamideMaintenance Phase: Participants With Major Extra-renal Flare7 participants
Mycophenolate MofetilMaintenance Phase: Participants With Major Extra-renal Flare6 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 27, 2026