Skip to content

A Study Comparing Monthly Boniva (Ibandronate) and Weekly Risedronate in Women With Post-Menopausal Osteoporosis.

Randomized, Open-label, Multi-center Study to Investigate Patient Preference on Dosing in Women With Postmenopausal Osteoporosis Treated With Once Monthly Ibandronate and Once Weekly Risedronate. A Six Month, Two-sequence and Two-period Crossover Study.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00377234
Enrollment
356
Registered
2006-09-18
Start date
2006-05-31
Completion date
2008-08-31
Last updated
2016-08-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Post Menopausal Osteoporosis

Brief summary

This 2 arm crossover study will evaluate patient reported preference for either once monthly Boniva (150mg p.o.) or once weekly risedronate (35mg p.o.). Patients with post-menopausal osteoporosis will be randomized to receive Boniva for 3 calendar months or risedronate for 12 weeks; they will then cross over to receive the alternative treatment for a further 12 weeks/3 months. The anticipated time on study treatment is 3-12 months, and the target sample size is 100-500 individuals.

Interventions

DRUGRisedronate

35mg po weekly for 12 weeks

150mg po monthly for 3 months

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
55 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ambulatory women with post-menopausal osteoporosis; * patients who are bisphosphonate-naive, or who have previously received oral daily or i.v. bisphosphonate therapy (fulfilling certain criteria detailed in the protocol).

Exclusion criteria

* malignant disease diagnosed within previous 10 years (except for successfully resected basal cell cancer;) breast cancer within previous 20 years; * inability to stand or sit upright for at least 60 minutes; * disease/disorder/treatment with drugs known to influence bone metabolism.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Who Preferred Ibandronate Monthly Dosing to Risedronate Weekly Dosingat 6 monthsPatients who had taken at least one dose of each study medication were asked to answer a Preference Questionnaire (answered by patients before any study procedures took place at the 6 month visit or at the early termination visit). The questionnaire included three questions on the preferred dosing schedule, and one question asking which schedule was more convenient. No assistance was allowed in completing the questionnaire.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Who Found Once-monthly Ibandronate to be More Convenient Than Once-weekly Risedronatewithin 6 monthsPatients who had taken at least one dose of each study medication were asked to answer a Preference Questionnaire (answered by patients before any study procedures took place at the 6 month visit or at the early termination visit). The questionnaire included three questions on the preferred dosing schedule, and one question asking which schedule was more convenient. No assistance was allowed in completing the questionnaire.
Intensity of Upper Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptomswithin 3 monthsPatients were given a diary in which to record their upper GI events during the first 12 weeks of treatment. The diary was to be completed weekly and the occurrence of symptoms and their intensity recorded using a pre-defined list.
Mean Change From Baseline in Bone Resorption and Bone Formation Markers, Serum C-telopeptide of α-chain of Type I Collagen (CTX) and Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP)3 monthsDuring the conduct of this study, it came to the attention of the sponsor that mislabeling of blood samples for the analysis of the bone turnover markers, serum CTX and BSAP, had occurred at more than half of the 44 clinical trial sites. As a result of this mislabeling, the bone turnover marker samples could not be assigned correctly to the two time points at which they were collected (samples collected at baseline and those collected at the crossover visit which occurred after 3 months following the start of trial treatment). Thus, the results of bone turnover markers could not be reliably assessed. Therefore, summary tables showing the mean and median change from baseline for both serum CTX and BSAP for patients randomized to Sequence A (3 months of ibandronate followed by 12 weeks of risedronate) or Sequence B (12 weeks of risedronate followed by 3 months of ibandronate) are not presented, as a valid interpretation of the data cannot be made.
Median Change From Baseline in Bone Resorption and Bone Formation Markers, Serum C-telopeptide of α-chain of Type I Collagen (CTX) and Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP)3 monthsDuring the conduct of this study, it came to the attention of the sponsor that mislabeling of blood samples for the analysis of the bone turnover markers, serum CTX and BSAP, had occurred at more than half of the 44 clinical trial sites. As a result of this mislabeling, the bone turnover marker samples could not be assigned correctly to the two time points at which they were collected (samples collected at baseline and those collected at the crossover visit which occurred after 3 months following the start of trial treatment). Thus, the results of bone turnover markers could not be reliably assessed. Therefore, summary tables showing the mean and median change from baseline for both serum CTX and BSAP for patients randomized to Sequence A (3 months of ibandronate followed by 12 weeks of risedronate) or Sequence B (12 weeks of risedronate followed by 3 months of ibandronate) are not presented, as a valid interpretation of the data cannot be made.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Of the 488 patients who were screened, 356 patients were enrolled into the study at 44 centers in the USA and randomized to treatment with ibandronate and risedronate. One hundred eighty patients were randomized to Sequence A (Period 1 ibandronate, Period 2 risedronate), and 176 patients to Sequence B (Period 1 risedronate, Period 2 ibandronate).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Sequence A
Ibandronate followed by risedronate
177
Sequence B
Risedronate followed by ibandronate
174
Total351

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdministrative21
Overall StudyAdverse Event1417
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up42
Overall StudyNot assigned32
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject119

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSequence ASequence BTotal
Age, Continuous64.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
64.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7
64.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.9
Region of Enrollment
United States
177 participants174 participants351 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
177 Participants174 Participants351 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 3270 / 327
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 3273 / 327

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Who Preferred Ibandronate Monthly Dosing to Risedronate Weekly Dosing

Patients who had taken at least one dose of each study medication were asked to answer a Preference Questionnaire (answered by patients before any study procedures took place at the 6 month visit or at the early termination visit). The questionnaire included three questions on the preferred dosing schedule, and one question asking which schedule was more convenient. No assistance was allowed in completing the questionnaire.

Time frame: at 6 months

Population: Modified Intent to Treat (mITT), defined as the safety analysis set excluding those participants who did not express a preference for one treatment

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
During Sequence APercentage of Participants Who Preferred Ibandronate Monthly Dosing to Risedronate Weekly Dosing81.7 percentage of participants
During Sequence BPercentage of Participants Who Preferred Ibandronate Monthly Dosing to Risedronate Weekly Dosing78.2 percentage of participants
TotalPercentage of Participants Who Preferred Ibandronate Monthly Dosing to Risedronate Weekly Dosing79.9 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.0001Garts Test
p-value: <0.0001Prescott Test
Secondary

Intensity of Upper Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptoms

Patients were given a diary in which to record their upper GI events during the first 12 weeks of treatment. The diary was to be completed weekly and the occurrence of symptoms and their intensity recorded using a pre-defined list.

Time frame: within 3 months

Population: Safety analysis set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
During Sequence AIntensity of Upper Gastrointestinal (GI) SymptomsAny46.1 percentage of participants
During Sequence AIntensity of Upper Gastrointestinal (GI) SymptomsMild41.3 percentage of participants
During Sequence AIntensity of Upper Gastrointestinal (GI) SymptomsModerate32.3 percentage of participants
During Sequence AIntensity of Upper Gastrointestinal (GI) SymptomsSevere15.6 percentage of participants
During Sequence BIntensity of Upper Gastrointestinal (GI) SymptomsSevere12.4 percentage of participants
During Sequence BIntensity of Upper Gastrointestinal (GI) SymptomsAny56.5 percentage of participants
During Sequence BIntensity of Upper Gastrointestinal (GI) SymptomsModerate36.0 percentage of participants
During Sequence BIntensity of Upper Gastrointestinal (GI) SymptomsMild49.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Bone Resorption and Bone Formation Markers, Serum C-telopeptide of α-chain of Type I Collagen (CTX) and Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP)

During the conduct of this study, it came to the attention of the sponsor that mislabeling of blood samples for the analysis of the bone turnover markers, serum CTX and BSAP, had occurred at more than half of the 44 clinical trial sites. As a result of this mislabeling, the bone turnover marker samples could not be assigned correctly to the two time points at which they were collected (samples collected at baseline and those collected at the crossover visit which occurred after 3 months following the start of trial treatment). Thus, the results of bone turnover markers could not be reliably assessed. Therefore, summary tables showing the mean and median change from baseline for both serum CTX and BSAP for patients randomized to Sequence A (3 months of ibandronate followed by 12 weeks of risedronate) or Sequence B (12 weeks of risedronate followed by 3 months of ibandronate) are not presented, as a valid interpretation of the data cannot be made.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: Mislabeling of blood samples for analysis of bone turnover markers resulted in inability to correctly assign samples to two time points at which they were collected (baseline and crossover visit). Results could not be reliably assessed or reported.

Secondary

Median Change From Baseline in Bone Resorption and Bone Formation Markers, Serum C-telopeptide of α-chain of Type I Collagen (CTX) and Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP)

During the conduct of this study, it came to the attention of the sponsor that mislabeling of blood samples for the analysis of the bone turnover markers, serum CTX and BSAP, had occurred at more than half of the 44 clinical trial sites. As a result of this mislabeling, the bone turnover marker samples could not be assigned correctly to the two time points at which they were collected (samples collected at baseline and those collected at the crossover visit which occurred after 3 months following the start of trial treatment). Thus, the results of bone turnover markers could not be reliably assessed. Therefore, summary tables showing the mean and median change from baseline for both serum CTX and BSAP for patients randomized to Sequence A (3 months of ibandronate followed by 12 weeks of risedronate) or Sequence B (12 weeks of risedronate followed by 3 months of ibandronate) are not presented, as a valid interpretation of the data cannot be made.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: Mislabeling of blood samples for analysis of bone turnover markers resulted in inability to correctly assign samples to two time points at which they were collected (baseline and crossover visit). Results could not be reliably assessed or reported.

Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Found Once-monthly Ibandronate to be More Convenient Than Once-weekly Risedronate

Patients who had taken at least one dose of each study medication were asked to answer a Preference Questionnaire (answered by patients before any study procedures took place at the 6 month visit or at the early termination visit). The questionnaire included three questions on the preferred dosing schedule, and one question asking which schedule was more convenient. No assistance was allowed in completing the questionnaire.

Time frame: within 6 months

Population: mITT, defined as the safety analysis set excluding those participants who did not express a preference for one treatment

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
During Sequence APercentage of Participants Who Found Once-monthly Ibandronate to be More Convenient Than Once-weekly Risedronate85.5 percentage of participants
During Sequence BPercentage of Participants Who Found Once-monthly Ibandronate to be More Convenient Than Once-weekly Risedronate87.0 percentage of participants
TotalPercentage of Participants Who Found Once-monthly Ibandronate to be More Convenient Than Once-weekly Risedronate86.3 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026