Lymphedema
Conditions
Keywords
lymphedema, stage IA breast cancer, stage IB breast cancer, stage II breast cancer, stage IIIA breast cancer, stage IIIB breast cancer, stage IIIC breast cancer
Brief summary
This randomized phase III trial studies how well education with or without physical therapy intervention works in preventing lymphedema in women with stage I, II, or III breast cancer who are undergoing axillary lymph node dissection (surgery to remove lymph nodes found in the armpit region). Lymphedema is a condition in which extra lymph fluid builds up in tissues and causes swelling in an arm or leg if lymph vessels are blocked, damaged, or removed by surgery. A personalized physical therapy intervention and education materials may be better than education materials alone in preventing lymphedema in women with breast cancer who are undergoing axillary lymph node dissection.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES: I. To test, in a group randomized controlled trial, the efficacy of this program versus education only in reducing the incidence of lymphedema. II. To compare the severity of lymphedema, in terms of changes in arm circumference at the site of greatest difference as a continuous variable between the two interventions. III. To assess the agreement between patients' self-report of swelling (mild, moderate, and severe) and the extent of circumferential measurement difference between the treated side and the contralateral arm at the site of greatest difference. IV. To compare the health-related quality of life (Factional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast \[FACT-B\]+4 score) between the two interventions. V. To characterize adherence to lymphedema prevention exercises, lymphedema knowledge, and range of motion. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Six weeks after surgery, patients receive a brief initial post-operative care session describing lymphedema risk and prevention through oral instruction and written materials. Patients complete physical assessments and questionnaires at 6 weeks and at 6, 12, and 18 months. Patients are also contacted by telephone at 9 and 15 months. ARM II: Patients receive lymphedema education and complete physical assessments and questionnaires as in Arm I. Patients also complete a personalized physical therapy intervention, receive a refrigerator magnet, and a 15-minute video that reinforces information and exercises.
Interventions
Ancillary studies
Receive lymphedema educational materials
Complete physical therapy-focused intervention
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Eligibility Criteria: * Newly diagnosed with stage I-III cancer of the female breast * No prior history of carcinoma in situ, lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS), ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), or invasive breast cancer \* Patients with a history of other invasive malignancies are eligible as long as they have completed treatment and are 5 years post-diagnosis; patients with basal cell and squamous cell cancer of the skin are eligible * Neoadjuvant therapy * Patients scheduled to receive any type of radiation therapy to the breast or axilla are eligible; however, they must be registered to this study with pre-surgery measures taken prior to receiving neoadjuvant therapy * Patients scheduled to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy are also eligible; however, they must be registered to this study with pre-surgery measurements taken prior to receiving neoadjuvant therapy * Patients receiving no neoadjuvant therapy are eligible * May be enrolled on other treatment trials; however, patients enrolled on surgery trials where only one treatment arm is full axillary node dissection are not eligible; NOTE: Patients enrolled on American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG)-Z1071 are eligible to participate in this study; patients concurrently enrolled on this study and ACOSOG-Z1071, may not also be enrolled on the ACOSOG-Z1071 lymphedema sub-study * No documented cardiac conduction disturbances, unstable angina, dementia, or any other chronic disease which, in the opinion of the treating physician, significantly increases mortality over the next 2 years * No diagnosed lymphedema * In order to be properly fitted for the elastic sleeve, eligible patients must have arm measurements for axilla, elbow, and wrist that fall within the ranges for one of the six sleeve sizes * Not currently homebound or dependent upon a walker or wheelchair for mobility * Able to participate in a mild exercise program * Willing to return to the study site for the duration of the study (18 months) * Sentinel (SND) or full axillary node dissection (AND) (no minimum number of nodes required) * Patients with double mastectomy, axillary node dissection and/or radiation on both arms are ineligible; patients who undergo these treatments (i.e., surgery and/or radiation) on the contralateral arm after registration to Step 2 are still eligible to remain in the study; however, it should be documented appropriately on form C-1628 at the conclusion of study participation
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants Who Were Lymphedema-free 18 Months After Randomization | 18 months | To test, in a group randomized controlled trial, the efficacy of this program versus education only in reducing the incidence of lymphedema. Reported here is the proportion of patients who are lymphedema-free 18 months after randomization between the two arms |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline at 18 Months in Arm Circumference at the Site of Greatest Difference | 18 months | To compare the severity of lymphedema in terms of changes in arm circumference at the site of greatest difference as a continuous variable between the two interventions. |
| Agreement Between Patients' Self-report of Swelling and the Extent of Circumferential Measurement Difference Between the Treated Side and the Contralateral Arm | 18 months | To assess the agreement between patients' self-report of swelling (mild, moderation and severe) and the extent of circumferential measurement difference between treated side and the contralateral arm at the site of greatest difference. Per protocol, this analysis will include all patients and not be comparing the intervention arm with the control arm. |
| Health-related Quality of Life as Assessed by FACT-B +4 Score | 18 months | To compare the health-related quality of life (FACT-B+4 score) between the two interventions. The change between baseline and month 18 for the total plus 4 score will be reported here. The total plus 4 score is an average of the physical, social, emotional, functional, FACT-G, and additional concerns sub-scales. Each sub-scale has questions ranging from 1-5. Once the average of all subscales is taken, the total plus 4 score is converted into a score out of 100. 100 being the best, 0 being the worst. |
| Adherence to Lymphedema Prevention Exercises, Lymphedema Knowledge, Range of Motion, and Arm Strength | from baseline up to 18 months | To characterize adherence to lymphedema prevention exercises, lymphedema knowledge and range of motion. The frequency of elastic sleeve use for heavy arm use/exercise/air travel will be reported here. Arm I did not receive a sleeve to wear, thus will not be reported. |
Countries
United States
Contacts
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Arm I (Lymphedema Education) Six weeks after surgery, patients receive a brief initial post-operative care session describing lymphedema risk and prevention through oral instruction and written materials. Patients complete physical assessments and questionnaires at 6 weeks and at 6, 12, and 18 months. Patients are also contacted by telephone at 9 and 15 months. | 242 |
| Arm II (Lymphedema Education, Physical Therapy) Patients receive lymphedema education and complete physical assessments and questionnaires as in Arm I. Patients also complete a personalized physical therapy intervention, receive a refrigerator magnet, and a 15-minute video that reinforces information and exercises. | 312 |
| Total | 554 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Arm I (Lymphedema Education) | Arm II (Lymphedema Education, Physical Therapy) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 57.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4 | 57.5 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2 | 57.7 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3 |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 242 participants | 312 participants | 554 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 242 Participants | 312 Participants | 554 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 |
Outcome results
Number of Participants Who Were Lymphedema-free 18 Months After Randomization
To test, in a group randomized controlled trial, the efficacy of this program versus education only in reducing the incidence of lymphedema. Reported here is the proportion of patients who are lymphedema-free 18 months after randomization between the two arms
Time frame: 18 months
Population: 554 patients completed treatment and were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Arm I (Lymphedema Education) | Number of Participants Who Were Lymphedema-free 18 Months After Randomization | 114 Participants |
| Arm II (Lymphedema Education, Physical Therapy) | Number of Participants Who Were Lymphedema-free 18 Months After Randomization | 135 Participants |
Adherence to Lymphedema Prevention Exercises, Lymphedema Knowledge, Range of Motion, and Arm Strength
To characterize adherence to lymphedema prevention exercises, lymphedema knowledge and range of motion. The frequency of elastic sleeve use for heavy arm use/exercise/air travel will be reported here. Arm I did not receive a sleeve to wear, thus will not be reported.
Time frame: from baseline up to 18 months
Population: 236 patients were analyzed for this endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arm I (Lymphedema Education) | Adherence to Lymphedema Prevention Exercises, Lymphedema Knowledge, Range of Motion, and Arm Strength | 6 months | 1%-74% | 108 Participants |
| Arm I (Lymphedema Education) | Adherence to Lymphedema Prevention Exercises, Lymphedema Knowledge, Range of Motion, and Arm Strength | 6 months | Not at all/never | 51 Participants |
| Arm I (Lymphedema Education) | Adherence to Lymphedema Prevention Exercises, Lymphedema Knowledge, Range of Motion, and Arm Strength | 12 months | >=75% | 66 Participants |
| Arm I (Lymphedema Education) | Adherence to Lymphedema Prevention Exercises, Lymphedema Knowledge, Range of Motion, and Arm Strength | 12 months | 1%-74% | 94 Participants |
| Arm I (Lymphedema Education) | Adherence to Lymphedema Prevention Exercises, Lymphedema Knowledge, Range of Motion, and Arm Strength | 12 months | Not at all/never | 49 Participants |
| Arm I (Lymphedema Education) | Adherence to Lymphedema Prevention Exercises, Lymphedema Knowledge, Range of Motion, and Arm Strength | 18 months | >=75% | 67 Participants |
| Arm I (Lymphedema Education) | Adherence to Lymphedema Prevention Exercises, Lymphedema Knowledge, Range of Motion, and Arm Strength | 18 months | 1%-74% | 92 Participants |
| Arm I (Lymphedema Education) | Adherence to Lymphedema Prevention Exercises, Lymphedema Knowledge, Range of Motion, and Arm Strength | 18 months | Not at all/never | 55 Participants |
| Arm I (Lymphedema Education) | Adherence to Lymphedema Prevention Exercises, Lymphedema Knowledge, Range of Motion, and Arm Strength | 6 months | >=75% | 77 Participants |
Agreement Between Patients' Self-report of Swelling and the Extent of Circumferential Measurement Difference Between the Treated Side and the Contralateral Arm
To assess the agreement between patients' self-report of swelling (mild, moderation and severe) and the extent of circumferential measurement difference between treated side and the contralateral arm at the site of greatest difference. Per protocol, this analysis will include all patients and not be comparing the intervention arm with the control arm.
Time frame: 18 months
Population: 368 patients filled out a self assessment of swelling and were analyzed. This includes all patients that filled out a self-report of swelling, the two arms are combined because this is a comparison of actual swelling against self reported swelling, not a comparison of interventions.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arm I (Lymphedema Education) | Agreement Between Patients' Self-report of Swelling and the Extent of Circumferential Measurement Difference Between the Treated Side and the Contralateral Arm | <0.5in difference between arms | Self Report None/Mild Swelling | 353 Participants |
| Arm I (Lymphedema Education) | Agreement Between Patients' Self-report of Swelling and the Extent of Circumferential Measurement Difference Between the Treated Side and the Contralateral Arm | <0.5in difference between arms | Self Report Moderate swelling | 8 Participants |
| Arm I (Lymphedema Education) | Agreement Between Patients' Self-report of Swelling and the Extent of Circumferential Measurement Difference Between the Treated Side and the Contralateral Arm | <0.5in difference between arms | Selft Report Severe swelling | 2 Participants |
| Arm I (Lymphedema Education) | Agreement Between Patients' Self-report of Swelling and the Extent of Circumferential Measurement Difference Between the Treated Side and the Contralateral Arm | 0.5in - 2in difference between arms | Self Report None/Mild Swelling | 11 Participants |
| Arm I (Lymphedema Education) | Agreement Between Patients' Self-report of Swelling and the Extent of Circumferential Measurement Difference Between the Treated Side and the Contralateral Arm | 0.5in - 2in difference between arms | Self Report Moderate swelling | 0 Participants |
| Arm I (Lymphedema Education) | Agreement Between Patients' Self-report of Swelling and the Extent of Circumferential Measurement Difference Between the Treated Side and the Contralateral Arm | 0.5in - 2in difference between arms | Selft Report Severe swelling | 0 Participants |
| Arm I (Lymphedema Education) | Agreement Between Patients' Self-report of Swelling and the Extent of Circumferential Measurement Difference Between the Treated Side and the Contralateral Arm | >= 2in difference between arms | Self Report None/Mild Swelling | 1 Participants |
| Arm I (Lymphedema Education) | Agreement Between Patients' Self-report of Swelling and the Extent of Circumferential Measurement Difference Between the Treated Side and the Contralateral Arm | >= 2in difference between arms | Self Report Moderate swelling | 1 Participants |
| Arm I (Lymphedema Education) | Agreement Between Patients' Self-report of Swelling and the Extent of Circumferential Measurement Difference Between the Treated Side and the Contralateral Arm | >= 2in difference between arms | Selft Report Severe swelling | 0 Participants |
Change From Baseline at 18 Months in Arm Circumference at the Site of Greatest Difference
To compare the severity of lymphedema in terms of changes in arm circumference at the site of greatest difference as a continuous variable between the two interventions.
Time frame: 18 months
Population: 402 patients were analyzed for this endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm I (Lymphedema Education) | Change From Baseline at 18 Months in Arm Circumference at the Site of Greatest Difference | 55.1 cubic cm | Standard Deviation 333.3 |
| Arm II (Lymphedema Education, Physical Therapy) | Change From Baseline at 18 Months in Arm Circumference at the Site of Greatest Difference | 46.6 cubic cm | Standard Deviation 417.2 |
Health-related Quality of Life as Assessed by FACT-B +4 Score
To compare the health-related quality of life (FACT-B+4 score) between the two interventions. The change between baseline and month 18 for the total plus 4 score will be reported here. The total plus 4 score is an average of the physical, social, emotional, functional, FACT-G, and additional concerns sub-scales. Each sub-scale has questions ranging from 1-5. Once the average of all subscales is taken, the total plus 4 score is converted into a score out of 100. 100 being the best, 0 being the worst.
Time frame: 18 months
Population: 326 patients were analyzed for this measurement.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm I (Lymphedema Education) | Health-related Quality of Life as Assessed by FACT-B +4 Score | 1.4 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.6 |
| Arm II (Lymphedema Education, Physical Therapy) | Health-related Quality of Life as Assessed by FACT-B +4 Score | 0.1 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.9 |