Skip to content

Kineflex|C Artificial Disc System to Treat Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD)

Clinical Study Protocol for the Investigation of the Kineflex|C Spinal System - a Pivotal Study in Continued Access Stage

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00374413
Enrollment
343
Registered
2006-09-11
Start date
2005-07-31
Completion date
2013-08-31
Last updated
2013-09-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD)

Keywords

DDD, artificial disc

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to show that the Kineflex\|C Spinal System is no worse than conventional Anterior Cervical Diskectomy with Fusion (ACDF) in patients with single level degenerative disc disease at any cervical level from C3 to C7.

Detailed description

The Kineflex\|C disc is a 3-piece modular design consisting of two cobalt chrome molybdenum (CCM) end-plates and a fully articulating CCM core. The system is available in two foot print sizes.

Interventions

DEVICEArtificial disk

Implant

DEVICEArtificial disc

Implant

Sponsors

SpinalMotion
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* have symptoms of cervical degenerative disc disease (DDD) at only one cervical level from C3 to C7, disc herniation on CT or MRI; * have radiculopathy symptoms in neck, one or both shoulders, and/or one or both arms; * have at least six months of prior conservative treatment (e.g., physical therapy and/or use of anti-inflammatory medications and muscle relaxants at the manufacturer's recommended therapeutic dose), the presence of progressive symptoms (e.g., increasing numbness or tingling), or signs of nerve root compression; * have moderate disability neck disability index (NDI) score; AND * be likely to return for all follow-up visits and be willing and able to provide informed consent for study participation

Exclusion criteria

* marked cervical instability; * non discogenic neck pain or non discogenic source of symptoms; * radiographic confirmation of severe facet disease or facet degeneration; * bridging osteophytes; * prior surgery at the level to be treated; * prior fusion at any cervical level; * more than one neck surgery via anterior approach; * previous trauma to the C3-C7 levels resulting in compression or bursting; * documented presence of free nuclear fragment at any cervical level; * severe myelopathy; * any paralysis; * history of chemical or alcohol dependence; * active systemic infection; * infection at the site of surgery; * prior disc space infection or osteomyelitis in the cervical spine; * any terminal, systemic or autoimmune disease; * metabolic bone disease (e.g., osteoporosis, gout, osteomalacia, Paget's disease); * any disease, condition or surgery which might impair healing; * known metal allergy; * arachnoiditis; * currently experiencing an episode of major mental illness; * pregnancy at time of enrollment, or planning to become pregnant, since this would contraindicate surgery; * morbid obesity; use of spinal stimulator at any cervical level prior to surgery; * currently a prisoner; * currently involved in spinal litigation which may influence the subjects reporting of symptoms; OR * lives more than 300 miles from study center or participation in any other investigational drug, biologic, or medical device study within the last 30 days prior to study surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Improvement in Neck Disability Index (NDI) Score at 24 months compared with baseline24 months
No major device related adverse events24 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Disc height at 24 months compared to baseline24 months
Adjacent level deterioration at 24 months compared to baseline24 months
Clinically significant improvement in one or more radicular symptoms at 24 months compared to baseline24 months
Displacement or migration of the device24 months
Odom's Criteria24 months
Progressive facet disease at 24 months compared to baseline24months
Time to recovery24 months

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 25, 2026