Skip to content

Randomized Trial on Effectiveness of ACTs in Ghana

A Comparative Assessment of the Effectiveness of Artemether Plus Lumefantrine Versus Artesunate Plus Amodiaquine for the Treatment of Children With Uncomplicated Plasmodium Falciparum Malaria

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00374205
Enrollment
245
Registered
2006-09-11
Start date
2006-09-30
Completion date
2007-10-31
Last updated
2007-11-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Malaria, Falciparum

Keywords

Ghana, Effectiveness, Safety, Drug-Resistance, ACT, Coartem, Arsucam

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of two Artemisinin Combination Therapies (ACTs) for the treatment of children with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria

Detailed description

Childhood mortality related to Plasmodium falciparum malaria is on the rise with more than 1 million deaths per year in Sub-Saharan Africa. In the context of growing drug-resistance to antimalarials health officials are calling for rapid replacement of failing drugs by combining antimalarial drugs. Artemisinin Combination Antimalarial Therapies (ACTs) are in the focus of malaria control programmes and are recommended for first-line treatment in African countries. ACTs have been reported to be highly effective as artemisinin derivatives cause a rapid and substantial decrease in the parasite load when used for treating patients with malaria and resistance to artemisinin is still lacking. However, the short half-lives of artemisinins result in frequent recrudescent infections when used alone and therefore, much interest lays on the choice of the combination partner drug. ACTs also have been proposed as a means of reducing transmission by the reduction of gametocytes and of delaying the spread of drug resistance and prolonging the therapeutic life span of. Nevertheless, drug resistance of parasites to the respective partner drug is a matter of concern. Artesunate-amodiaquine (AQ) and artemether-lumefantrine (AL) are two registered fixed-dose artemisinin combination chemotherapies used in Africa which are GMP-manufactured at industrial scale. There is still limited data from randomised, controlled trials to support the general effectiveness of these two ACTs in Africa, including Ghana. More data is needed to compare these two therapies to make evidence-based first-line treatment decisions. Importantly, it is difficult to predict how combination therapy may affect the spread of drug resistance and monitoring drug resistance markers should be embedded in these trials to guide drug policy decision. The aim of this open-labelled, randomised drug trial is to compare the effectiveness and safety of artesunate-amodiaquine (Arsucam®) against artemether plus lumefantrine (Coartem®) for the treatment of children under five years of age with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria.

Interventions

Artesunate 50 mg and Amodiaquine 153 mg co-blister tablets: 3 days once daily weight-adjusted dosing according to manufacturer

DRUGArtemether-Lumefantrine

Artemether 20 mg/Lumefantrine 120mg fixe-dose-combination tablets: 3 days twice daily weight-adjusted dosing according to manufacturer

Sponsors

Presbyterian Health Service (PHS)
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Kumasi Centre for Collaborative Research (KCCR)
CollaboratorOTHER
School of Medical Sciences Kumasi (SMS/KNUST)
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Months to 59 Months
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male and female outpatients aged 6 months to 59 months * Absence of severe malnutrition * A slide-confirmed P. falciparum asexual parasitaemia between 2,000/µl and 200,000/µl * A measured axillary temperature ≥ 37.5 °C or rectal/tympanic temperature ≥ 38.0 °C * Absence of general danger signs (unable to drink; repeated vomiting; recent history of convulsions; lethargic or unconscious state; unable to stand up or to sit) * Ability to tolerate oral therapy * Permanent residence in study area * Informed consent by the legal representative of the subject, if possible, the parents

Exclusion criteria

* Adequate anti-malarial treatment within the previous 7 days * Antibiotic treatment for a current infection * Previous participation in a clinical trial * Haemoglobin \< 5 g/dl * Leucocyte count: \> 15000/µl * Mixed plasmodial infection * Severe malaria as defined by WHO recommendations * Any other severe underlying disease (cardiac, renal, hepatic diseases, malnutrition, known HIV infection) or concomitant disease masking assessment of response * History of allergy or intolerance against trial medication

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Clinical and PCR-controlled parasitological cure rate at day 2828 days

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Clinical and PCR-controlled parasitological cure rate at day 1414 days
Effect on anaemia28 days
Molecular Drug Resistance Markers28 days
Recrudescence and Reinfection28 days
Effects on Gametocytemia28 days
Acceptance of Therapies7 days
Incidences of malaria episodes over a follow-up period of 1 year12 months

Countries

Ghana

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026