Skip to content

Bevacizumab Versus Combined Bevacizumab and Triamcinolone for Refractory Diabetic Macular Edema; a Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00370422
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2006-08-31
Start date
2005-11-30
Completion date
2006-09-30
Last updated
2007-03-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetic Macular Edema

Keywords

Cystoid macular edema, Diabetic macular edema, Hard exudates, Intravitreal bevacizumab, Intravitreal triamcinolone, Macular thickness

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of intravitreal injection of bevacizumab alone versus bevacizumab combined with triamcinolone for treatment of refractory diabetic macular edema.

Detailed description

According to the early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS), the treatment of choice for diabetic macular edema is laser therapy, which may be neither effective nor curative in some patients. Corticosteroids may have a beneficial effect on diabetic macular edema. Other newly introduced medications for macular edematous lesions are anti-VEGF vascular endothelial growth factor)drugs. In this randomized, sham-controlled, multicenter, three-arm clinical trial,we try to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab alone and in combination with intravitreal triamcinolone in the treatment of refractory diabetic macular edema.

Interventions

DRUGTriamcinolone, Bevacizumab

Sponsors

Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Cases with clinically significant macular edema (CSME) with persistent retinal thickening after initial or supplemental macular photocoagulation

Exclusion criteria

* Monocularity, * History of vitrectomy, * Glaucoma or ocular hypertension, * Significant media opacity, * Existence of traction on the macula

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Visual acuity
Central macular thickness

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Cataract progression
Intraocular pressure
Anterior chamber reaction

Countries

Iran

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026