Skip to content

RAISE: Randomized Placebo-Controlled Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP) Study With Eltrombopag

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase III Study, to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Eltrombopag Olamine (SB-497115-GR), a Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonist, Administered for 6 Months as Oral Tablets Once Daily in Adult Subjects With Previously Treated Chronic ITP.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00370331
Acronym
RAISE
Enrollment
197
Registered
2006-08-31
Start date
2006-11-30
Completion date
2008-07-31
Last updated
2017-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Purpura, Thrombocytopaenic, Idiopathic

Keywords

ITP, idiopathic, platelets, purpura, thrombocytopenia, Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura, thrombocytopenic

Brief summary

The rationale for this Phase III study is to evaluate the 6 month safety and efficacy of eltrombopag in the treatment of previously treated subjects with chronic ITP. The starting dose of eltrombopag, 50 mg, once daily was selected based upon the observed efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics in a dose-finding Study (TRA100773). This Phase III study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase III study, to evaluate efficacy, safety and tolerability of eltrombopag, initially administered as 50 mg oral tablets once daily for six months in adult subjects with previously treated chronic ITP. Subjects will be randomized 2:1, eltrombopag to placebo, and will be stratified based upon splenectomy status, use of ITP medication at baseline and baseline platelet count less than or equal to 15,000/µL. Subjects will receive study medication for 6 months, during which the dose of study medication may be adjusted based upon individual platelet counts. In addition, subjects may taper off concomitant ITP medications and may receive any rescue treatments as dictated by local standard of care. After discontinuation of study medication, subjects will complete follow-up visits at weeks 1, 2, 4 and months 3 and 6.

Detailed description

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study, to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of eltrombopag olamine (SB-497115-GR), a thrombopoietin receptor agonist, administered for 6 months as oral tablets once daily in adult subjects with previously treated chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP).

Interventions

DRUGeltrombopag

Subjects will initiate treatment with either 50 mg eltrombopag or matching placebo once daily. Based upon the subjects platelet count at each visit, the dose of eltrombopag may be adjusted either up or down.

DRUGPlacebo

Subjects will initiate treatment with either 50 mg eltrombopag or matching placebo once daily. Based upon the subjects platelet count at each visit, the dose of eltrombopag may be adjusted either up or down

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* A subject will be eligible for inclusion in this study only if all of the following criteria apply: * Subject has signed and dated a written informed consent. * Adults (≥18 years) diagnosed with chronic ITP according to the American Society for Hematology/British Committee for Standards in Hematology (ASH/BCSH) guidelines \[George, 1996; BCSH, 2003\], and platelet count \< 30,000/μL on Day 1 (or within 24 hours prior to dosing on Day 1). In addition, a peripheral blood smear should support the diagnosis of ITP with no evidence of other causes of thrombocytopenia (e.g. pseudothrombocytopenia, myelofibrosis). The physical examination should not suggest any disease which may cause thrombocytopenia other than ITP. * Subjects who have previously received one or more prior ITP therapies. Previous treatments for ITP include but are not limited to corticosteroids, immunoglobulins, azathioprine, danazol, cyclophosphamide and/or rituximab. * Subjects must have either initially responded (platelet count \> 100,000/μL) to a previous ITP therapy or have had a bone marrow examination consistent with ITP within 3 years to rule out myelodysplastic syndromes or other causes of thrombocytopenia. * Previous therapy for ITP with immunoglobulins (IVIg and anti-D) must have been completed at least 1 week prior to randomization and the platelet count must show a clear downward trend after the last treatment with immunoglobulins. Previous treatment for ITP with splenectomy, rituximab and cyclophosphamide must have been completed at least 4 weeks prior to randomization, or clearly be ineffective. * Subjects treated with concomitant ITP medication (e.g. corticosteroids or azathioprine) must be receiving a dose that has been stable for at least 4 weeks prior to randomization. Subjects treated with cyclosporine A, mycophenolate mofetil or danazol must be receiving a dose that has been stable for at least 3 months prior to randomization. The medication should be continued with a stable dose for the initial 6 weeks of study Concomitant ITP Therapy) * Prothrombin time (PT/INR) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) must be within 80 to 120% of the normal range with no history of hypercoagulable state. * A complete blood count (CBC), within the reference range (including WBC differential not indicative of a disorder other than ITP), with the following exceptions: * \< 30,000 platelets/μL on Day 1 (or within 24 hours of Day 1) is required for inclusion, * Hemoglobin: Subjects with hemoglobin levels between 10 g/dL (100 g/L) and the lower limit of normal are eligible for inclusion, if anemia is clearly attributable to ITP (excessive blood loss). * ANC ≥ 1500/μL (1.5 x 10\^9/L) is required for inclusion (elevated WBC/ANC due to steroid treatment is acceptable). * The following clinical chemistries MUST NOT exceed the upper limit of normal (ULN) reference range by more than 20%: creatinine, ALT, AST, total bilirubin, and alkaline phosphatase. In addition, total albumin must not be below the lower limit of normal (LLN) by more than 10%. * Subject is practicing an acceptable method of contraception (documented in chart). Female subjects (or female partners of male subjects) must either be of non-childbearing potential (hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, bilateral tubal ligation or post-menopausal \> 1 year), or of childbearing potential and use one of the following highly effective methods of contraception (i.e., Pearl Index \<1.0%) from two weeks prior to administration of study medication, throughout the study, and 28 days after completion or premature discontinuation from the study: * Complete abstinence from intercourse; * Intrauterine device (IUD); * Two forms of barrier contraception (diaphragm plus spermicide, and for males condom plus spermicide); * Male partner is sterile prior to entry into the study and is the only partner of the female; * Systemic contraceptives (combined or progesterone only). Subject is able to understand and comply with protocol requirements and instructions and intends to complete the study as planned.

Exclusion criteria

* A subject will NOT be eligible for inclusion in this study if any of the following criteria apply: * Any clinically relevant abnormality, other than ITP, identified on the screening examination or any other medical condition or circumstance, which in the opinion of the investigator makes the subject unsuitable for participation in the study or suggests another primary diagnosis (e.g., thrombocytopenia is secondary to another disease). * Concurrent malignant disease and/or history of cancer treatment with cytotoxic chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. * Any prior history of arterial or venous thrombosis (stroke, transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism), AND ≥ two of the following risk factors: hormone replacement therapy, systemic contraception (containing estrogen), smoking, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, medication for hypertension, cancer, hereditary thrombophilic disorders (e.g., Factor V Leiden, ATIII deficiency, etc), or any other family history of arterial or venous thrombosis. * Pre-existing cardiovascular disease (congestive heart failure, New York Heart Association \[NYHA\] Grade III/IV), or arrhythmia known to increase the risk of thromboembolic events (e.g. atrial fibrillation), or subjects with a QTc \>450 msec. * Female subjects who are nursing or pregnant (positive serum or urine b-human chorionic gonadotrophin pregnancy test) at screening or pre-dose on Day 1. * History of alcohol/drug abuse. * Treatment with an investigational drug within 30 days or five half-lives (whichever is longer) preceding the first dose of study medication. * Subject treated with drugs that affect platelet function (including but not limited to aspirin, clopidogrel and/or NSAIDs) or anti-coagulants for \> 3 consecutive days within 2 weeks of the study start and until the end of the study. * History of platelet agglutination abnormality that prevents reliable measurement of platelet counts. * All subjects with secondary immune thrombocytopenia, including those with laboratory or clinical evidence of HIV infection, anti-phospholipid antibody syndrome, chronic hepatitis B infection, hepatitis C virus infection, or any evidence for active hepatitis at the time of subject screening. If a potential subject has no clinical history that would support HIV infection or hepatitis infection, no further laboratory screening is necessary; however, standard medical practice would suggest further evaluation of patients who have risk factors for these infections. * Previous participation in a clinical study with eltrombopag. * Patients planning to have cataract surgery. * In France, a subject is neither affiliated with nor a beneficiary of a social security category.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of RespondersBaseline; each on-therapy treatment day; Weeks 10, 14, 18, 22, and 26; and Weeks 1, 2, and 4 post-treatmentThe percentage of evaluable participants who achieved a platelet response (defined as a platelet count between 50,000 and 400,000 microliter) at each nominal on-therapy day and 4 weeks post-treatment

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
HR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the MEI-SF Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentBaseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26/Early WithdrawalHealth-related quality of life (HR-QoL) patient reported outcomes from the motivation and energy inventory-short form (MEI-SF) questionnaire. Scores could range from 0 (worst possible) to 72 (best possible).
Summary of Median Platelet CountsBaseline; Day 8 through Week 26 on-treatment; and 1, 2, 4 week follow-up visitsPlatelet counts were measured by blood draw.
Percentage of Participants Initiating Rescue Treatment On-therapyAnytime from Day 1 to Week 26Percentage of participants initiating new ITP medication, an increased dose of concomitant ITP medication from baseline, platelet transfusion, or splenectomy.
Maximum and Total Weeks of Platelet ResponseDay 1 through Week 26 on-treatmentResponse is defined as a platelet count between 50,000 and 400,000 platelets per microliter.
Percentage of Participants With a Reduction in Use of Baseline ITP MedicationFrom Day 1 through Week 26 on-treatmentPercentage of participants who experienced a reduction in their baseline concomitant ITP medication use
WHO Bleeding ScaleBaseline, all nominal visits on-therapy defined as Day 8, Day 15, Day 22, Day 29, Day 36, Day 43, Week 10, Week 14, Week 18, Week 22, Week 26, and 1, 2 and 4 week follow-up visitsSummary of World Health Organization (WHO) bleeding scores at each nominal visit. WHO Grades 1-4 = any bleeding; WHO Grades 2-4 = clinically significant bleeding
HR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentBaseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26/Early WithdrawalHealth-related quality of life (HR-QoL) patient reported outcomes from the short form-36v2 (SF-36v2) questionnaire. Scores could range from 0 (worst possible) to 100 (best possible).
HR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the FACIT-F Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentBaseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26/Early WithdrawalHealth-related quality of life (HR-QoL) patient reported outcomes from the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy fatigue (FACIT-F) questionnaire. Scores could range from 0 (worst possible) to 52 (best possible).
HR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores for the FACT-Th Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentBaseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26/Early WithdrawalHealth-related quality of life (HR-QoL) patient reported outcomes from the functional assessment of cancer therapy thrombocytopenia (FACT-Th) questionnaire (six selected items). Scores could range from 0 (worst possible) to 24 (best possible).

Countries

Austria, Canada, China, Czechia, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hong Kong, India, Italy, Netherlands, New Zealand, Peru, Poland, Russia, Slovakia, Spain, Taiwan, Tunisia, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States, Vietnam

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Matching placebo tablets taken once a day
62
Eltrombopag 50 mg QD
Eltrombopag 50 mg oral tablets taken once a day (QD)
135
Total197

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event413
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy01
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up03
Overall StudyNon-compliance01
Overall StudyProtocol Violation11
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject24

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalEltrombopag 50 mg QDPlacebo
Age, Continuous47.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.45
46.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.61
51.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.72
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American/African
3 participants2 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian/Alaska native
12 participants8 participants4 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
East Asian
29 participants19 participants10 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Mixed Race
2 participants2 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander
1 participants1 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
South-East Asian
5 participants2 participants3 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White/Arabic/North African
8 participants6 participants2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White/Caucasian/European
137 participants95 participants42 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
136 Participants93 Participants43 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
61 Participants42 Participants19 Participants
Stratification variable
Platelet count less or equal 15,000 per microliter
97 Participants67 Participants30 Participants
Stratification variable
Splenectomy at randomization
71 Participants50 Participants21 Participants
Stratification variable
Use of ITP medication at randomization
94 Participants63 Participants31 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
56 / 61120 / 135
serious
Total, serious adverse events
11 / 6116 / 135

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Responders

The percentage of evaluable participants who achieved a platelet response (defined as a platelet count between 50,000 and 400,000 microliter) at each nominal on-therapy day and 4 weeks post-treatment

Time frame: Baseline; each on-therapy treatment day; Weeks 10, 14, 18, 22, and 26; and Weeks 1, 2, and 4 post-treatment

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all randomized participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of RespondersDay 87 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of RespondersWeek 1418 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of RespondersDay 368 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of RespondersWeek 1817 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of RespondersDay 158 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of RespondersWeek 2219 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of RespondersBaseline2 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of RespondersWeek 2617 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of RespondersDay 228 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Responders1 Week Follow-up15 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of RespondersDay 4314 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Responders2 Week Follow-up18 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of RespondersDay 2910 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Responders4 Week Follow-up14 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of RespondersWeek 1017 Percentage of participants
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDPercentage of Responders4 Week Follow-up20 Percentage of participants
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDPercentage of RespondersDay 3656 Percentage of participants
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDPercentage of RespondersDay 4354 Percentage of participants
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDPercentage of RespondersBaseline1 Percentage of participants
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDPercentage of RespondersDay 837 Percentage of participants
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDPercentage of RespondersDay 1546 Percentage of participants
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDPercentage of RespondersDay 2251 Percentage of participants
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDPercentage of RespondersWeek 1052 Percentage of participants
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDPercentage of RespondersWeek 1446 Percentage of participants
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDPercentage of RespondersWeek 1846 Percentage of participants
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDPercentage of RespondersWeek 2249 Percentage of participants
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDPercentage of RespondersWeek 2652 Percentage of participants
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDPercentage of Responders1 Week Follow-up42 Percentage of participants
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDPercentage of Responders2 Week Follow-up22 Percentage of participants
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDPercentage of RespondersDay 2949 Percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00199% CI: [3.59, 18.73]Repeated measures model for binary data
Secondary

HR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores for the FACT-Th Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study Treatment

Health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) patient reported outcomes from the functional assessment of cancer therapy thrombocytopenia (FACT-Th) questionnaire (six selected items). Scores could range from 0 (worst possible) to 24 (best possible).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26/Early Withdrawal

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores for the FACT-Th Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentBaseline14.8 Points on a scale (0-24)Standard Deviation 5.8
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores for the FACT-Th Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentWeek 615.1 Points on a scale (0-24)Standard Deviation 5.7
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores for the FACT-Th Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentWeek 1415.3 Points on a scale (0-24)Standard Deviation 5.4
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores for the FACT-Th Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentWeek 26/Early Withdrawal15.3 Points on a scale (0-24)Standard Deviation 6
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores for the FACT-Th Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentWeek 26/Early Withdrawal16.0 Points on a scale (0-24)Standard Deviation 6.1
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores for the FACT-Th Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentBaseline13.5 Points on a scale (0-24)Standard Deviation 5.8
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores for the FACT-Th Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentWeek 1416.7 Points on a scale (0-24)Standard Deviation 5.6
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores for the FACT-Th Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentWeek 615.9 Points on a scale (0-24)Standard Deviation 6
Secondary

HR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the FACIT-F Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study Treatment

Health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) patient reported outcomes from the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy fatigue (FACIT-F) questionnaire. Scores could range from 0 (worst possible) to 52 (best possible).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26/Early Withdrawal

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the FACIT-F Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentWeek 26/Early Withdrawal37.0 Points on a scale (0-52)Standard Deviation 11.3
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the FACIT-F Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentBaseline36.3 Points on a scale (0-52)Standard Deviation 9
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the FACIT-F Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentWeek 1436.9 Points on a scale (0-52)Standard Deviation 10.2
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the FACIT-F Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentWeek 638.3 Points on a scale (0-52)Standard Deviation 8.2
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the FACIT-F Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentWeek 1439.5 Points on a scale (0-52)Standard Deviation 9.9
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the FACIT-F Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentWeek 26/Early Withdrawal39.2 Points on a scale (0-52)Standard Deviation 10.1
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the FACIT-F Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentBaseline36.0 Points on a scale (0-52)Standard Deviation 12.2
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the FACIT-F Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentWeek 639.2 Points on a scale (0-52)Standard Deviation 9.7
Secondary

HR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the MEI-SF Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study Treatment

Health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) patient reported outcomes from the motivation and energy inventory-short form (MEI-SF) questionnaire. Scores could range from 0 (worst possible) to 72 (best possible).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26/Early Withdrawal

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the MEI-SF Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentBaseline71.3 Points on a scale (0-72)Standard Deviation 17.2
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the MEI-SF Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentWeek 673.4 Points on a scale (0-72)Standard Deviation 16.4
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the MEI-SF Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentWeek 1471.1 Points on a scale (0-72)Standard Deviation 20.5
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the MEI-SF Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentWeek 26/Early Withdrawal72.0 Points on a scale (0-72)Standard Deviation 21.7
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the MEI-SF Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentWeek 26/Early Withdrawal76.7 Points on a scale (0-72)Standard Deviation 20.2
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the MEI-SF Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentBaseline72.7 Points on a scale (0-72)Standard Deviation 21.4
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the MEI-SF Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentWeek 1476.9 Points on a scale (0-72)Standard Deviation 20.5
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the MEI-SF Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentWeek 676.2 Points on a scale (0-72)Standard Deviation 19.5
Secondary

HR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study Treatment

Health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) patient reported outcomes from the short form-36v2 (SF-36v2) questionnaire. Scores could range from 0 (worst possible) to 100 (best possible).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26/Early Withdrawal

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 bodily pain, Week 1468.3 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 24.8
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 physical function, Week 676.5 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 20.8
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 physical function, Week 1477.6 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 20
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 physical funct., Week 26/Early Withdrawal75.8 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 22.6
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 physical role, Baseline64.5 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 26.7
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 physical role, Week 666.9 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 25.4
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 physical role, Week 1467.2 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 25.8
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 physical role, Week 26/Early Withdrawal67.5 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 27.1
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 bodily pain, Baseline70.0 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 23.2
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 bodily pain, Week 669.9 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 25.9
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 physical function, Baseline75.0 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 21.7
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 bodily pain, Week 26/Early Withdrawal68.5 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 25
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 general health, Baseline53.7 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 21.8
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 general health, Week 655.9 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 21.4
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 general health, Week 1452.8 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 23.2
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 general health, Week 26/Early Withdrawal53.3 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 24.9
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 vitality, Baseline56.7 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 20.2
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 vitality, Week 659.0 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 20
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 vitality, Week 1456.8 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 22.3
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 vitality, Week 26/Early Withdrawal57.5 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 22.4
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 social function, Baseline76.1 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 21.7
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 social function, Week 678.0 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 21.4
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 social function, Week 1473.4 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 25.8
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 social function, Week 26/Early Withdrawal75.0 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 25.8
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 emotional role, Baseline73.4 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 25.4
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 emotional role, Week 673.1 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 24.6
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 emotional role, Week 1473.3 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 22.9
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 emotional role, Week 26/Early Withdrawal71.5 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 26.5
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 mental health, Baseline70.3 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 18.7
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 mental health, Week 671.7 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 18.3
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 mental health, Week 1468.6 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 20.4
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 mental health, Week 26/Early Withdrawal68.6 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 22.8
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v physical component summary, Baseline45.6 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 8.3
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v physical component summary, Week 646.2 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 8.3
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v physical component summary, Week 1446.3 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 8.3
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v physical component summary, Week 26/EW46.2 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 8.1
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 mental component summary, Baseline46.4 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 10.1
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 mental component summary, Week 646.8 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 10
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 mental component summary, Week 1445.3 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 11.1
PlaceboHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 mental component summary, Week 26/EW45.2 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 12.3
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 mental component summary, Week 647.2 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 11.1
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 physical function, Baseline73.1 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 26.8
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 social function, Baseline72.7 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 28.3
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 physical function, Week 678.0 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 24.4
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 mental health, Week 1470.6 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 19.3
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 physical function, Week 1478.9 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 22.5
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 social function, Week 677.6 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 26.2
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 physical funct., Week 26/Early Withdrawal80.6 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 21.7
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v physical component summary, Week 26/EW48.7 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 8.6
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 physical role, Baseline64.5 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 30.5
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 social function, Week 1478.4 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 22.6
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 physical role, Week 673.7 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 27.4
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 mental health, Week 26/Early Withdrawal70.2 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 21.6
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 physical role, Week 1472.9 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 24.9
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 social function, Week 26/Early Withdrawal79.0 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 24.2
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 physical role, Week 26/Early Withdrawal73.7 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 25.4
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 mental component summary, Week 26/EW46.5 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 12.4
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 bodily pain, Baseline75.2 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 27.8
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 emotional role, Baseline69.1 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 30.9
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 bodily pain, Week 678.5 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 25.4
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v physical component summary, Baseline46.9 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 9.7
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 bodily pain, Week 1477.6 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 25.8
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 emotional role, Week 677.5 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 25.9
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 bodily pain, Week 26/Early Withdrawal75.7 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 26.6
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 mental component summary, Baseline44.3 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 12.6
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 general health, Baseline56.0 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 21.3
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 emotional role, Week 1474.1 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 25.2
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 general health, Week 659.7 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 21.5
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v physical component summary, Week 648.7 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 9
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 general health, Week 1459.3 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 20.7
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 emotional role, Week 26/Early Withdrawal76.9 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 25.4
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 general health, Week 26/Early Withdrawal57.3 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 23.1
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 mental component summary, Week 1446.2 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 11.3
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 vitality, Baseline55.1 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 26.3
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 mental health, Baseline68.0 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 21
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 vitality, Week 662.1 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 22.7
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v physical component summary, Week 1449.0 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 8.1
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 vitality, Week 1461.0 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 22.4
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 mental health, Week 671.8 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 19
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDHR-QoL Instrument and Domain Scores From the SF-36v2 Questionnaire at Baseline, Week 6, Week 14, and Week 26 or Early Discontinuation From Study TreatmentSF-36v2 vitality, Week 26/Early Withdrawal60.0 Points on a scale (0-100)Standard Deviation 23.3
Secondary

Maximum and Total Weeks of Platelet Response

Response is defined as a platelet count between 50,000 and 400,000 platelets per microliter.

Time frame: Day 1 through Week 26 on-treatment

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboMaximum and Total Weeks of Platelet ResponseMaximum continuous Response0 Weeks
PlaceboMaximum and Total Weeks of Platelet ResponseCumulative Response0 Weeks
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDMaximum and Total Weeks of Platelet ResponseMaximum continuous Response8.1 Weeks
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDMaximum and Total Weeks of Platelet ResponseCumulative Response10.9 Weeks
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Initiating Rescue Treatment On-therapy

Percentage of participants initiating new ITP medication, an increased dose of concomitant ITP medication from baseline, platelet transfusion, or splenectomy.

Time frame: Anytime from Day 1 to Week 26

Population: All participants randomized to receive placebo or eltrombopag treatment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Initiating Rescue Treatment On-therapyParticipants who received rescue treatment40 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Initiating Rescue Treatment On-therapyParticipants who did not receive rescue treatment60 Percentage of participants
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDPercentage of Participants Initiating Rescue Treatment On-therapyParticipants who received rescue treatment18 Percentage of participants
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDPercentage of Participants Initiating Rescue Treatment On-therapyParticipants who did not receive rescue treatment82 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Reduction in Use of Baseline ITP Medication

Percentage of participants who experienced a reduction in their baseline concomitant ITP medication use

Time frame: From Day 1 through Week 26 on-treatment

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Reduction in Use of Baseline ITP MedicationParticipants who reduced/discontinued ITP therapy32 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Reduction in Use of Baseline ITP MedicationParticipants not reducing/discont. ITP therapy68 Percentage of participants
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDPercentage of Participants With a Reduction in Use of Baseline ITP MedicationParticipants who reduced/discontinued ITP therapy59 Percentage of participants
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDPercentage of Participants With a Reduction in Use of Baseline ITP MedicationParticipants not reducing/discont. ITP therapy41 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Summary of Median Platelet Counts

Platelet counts were measured by blood draw.

Time frame: Baseline; Day 8 through Week 26 on-treatment; and 1, 2, 4 week follow-up visits

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboSummary of Median Platelet CountsDay 2918,000 platelets/microliter (ul)
PlaceboSummary of Median Platelet CountsWeek 1417,500 platelets/microliter (ul)
PlaceboSummary of Median Platelet CountsBaseline16,000 platelets/microliter (ul)
PlaceboSummary of Median Platelet CountsWeek 1820,500 platelets/microliter (ul)
PlaceboSummary of Median Platelet CountsDay 3619,000 platelets/microliter (ul)
PlaceboSummary of Median Platelet CountsWeek 2223,000 platelets/microliter (ul)
PlaceboSummary of Median Platelet CountsDay 2218,500 platelets/microliter (ul)
PlaceboSummary of Median Platelet CountsWeek 2623,000 platelets/microliter (ul)
PlaceboSummary of Median Platelet CountsDay 4320,000 platelets/microliter (ul)
PlaceboSummary of Median Platelet Counts1 Week Follow-up19,000 platelets/microliter (ul)
PlaceboSummary of Median Platelet CountsDay 817,500 platelets/microliter (ul)
PlaceboSummary of Median Platelet Counts2 Week Follow-up18,000 platelets/microliter (ul)
PlaceboSummary of Median Platelet CountsWeek 1020,000 platelets/microliter (ul)
PlaceboSummary of Median Platelet Counts4 Week Follow-up18,000 platelets/microliter (ul)
PlaceboSummary of Median Platelet CountsDay 1518,000 platelets/microliter (ul)
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDSummary of Median Platelet Counts4 Week Follow-up24,000 platelets/microliter (ul)
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDSummary of Median Platelet CountsDay 1554,000 platelets/microliter (ul)
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDSummary of Median Platelet CountsDay 2254,000 platelets/microliter (ul)
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDSummary of Median Platelet CountsBaseline16,000 platelets/microliter (ul)
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDSummary of Median Platelet CountsDay 836,000 platelets/microliter (ul)
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDSummary of Median Platelet CountsDay 2953,000 platelets/microliter (ul)
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDSummary of Median Platelet CountsDay 3660,000 platelets/microliter (ul)
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDSummary of Median Platelet CountsDay 4359,000 platelets/microliter (ul)
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDSummary of Median Platelet CountsWeek 1061,500 platelets/microliter (ul)
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDSummary of Median Platelet CountsWeek 1460,000 platelets/microliter (ul)
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDSummary of Median Platelet CountsWeek 1861,000 platelets/microliter (ul)
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDSummary of Median Platelet CountsWeek 2272,000 platelets/microliter (ul)
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDSummary of Median Platelet CountsWeek 2673,500 platelets/microliter (ul)
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDSummary of Median Platelet Counts1 Week Follow-up38,500 platelets/microliter (ul)
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDSummary of Median Platelet Counts2 Week Follow-up21,000 platelets/microliter (ul)
Secondary

WHO Bleeding Scale

Summary of World Health Organization (WHO) bleeding scores at each nominal visit. WHO Grades 1-4 = any bleeding; WHO Grades 2-4 = clinically significant bleeding

Time frame: Baseline, all nominal visits on-therapy defined as Day 8, Day 15, Day 22, Day 29, Day 36, Day 43, Week 10, Week 14, Week 18, Week 22, Week 26, and 1, 2 and 4 week follow-up visits

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboWHO Bleeding ScaleWeek 18, WHO Grades 1-459 Percentage of participants
PlaceboWHO Bleeding ScaleBaseline, WHO Grades 2-428 Percentage of participants
PlaceboWHO Bleeding ScaleDay 29, WHO Grades 1-456 Percentage of participants
PlaceboWHO Bleeding ScaleDay 8, WHO Grades 2-420 Percentage of participants
PlaceboWHO Bleeding ScaleDay 15, WHO Grades 2-422 Percentage of participants
PlaceboWHO Bleeding ScaleBaseline, WHO Grades 1-477 Percentage of participants
PlaceboWHO Bleeding ScaleDay 22, WHO Grades 2-421 Percentage of participants
PlaceboWHO Bleeding ScaleDay 36, WHO Grades 1-466 Percentage of participants
PlaceboWHO Bleeding ScaleDay 29, WHO Grades 2-419 Percentage of participants
PlaceboWHO Bleeding ScaleWeek 14, WHO Grades 1-457 Percentage of participants
PlaceboWHO Bleeding ScaleDay 36, WHO Grades 2-419 Percentage of participants
PlaceboWHO Bleeding ScaleDay 43, WHO Grades 1-459 Percentage of participants
PlaceboWHO Bleeding ScaleDay 43, WHO Grades 2-419 Percentage of participants
PlaceboWHO Bleeding ScaleDay 8, WHO Grades 1-473 Percentage of participants
PlaceboWHO Bleeding ScaleWeek 10, WHO Grades 2-413 Percentage of participants
PlaceboWHO Bleeding ScaleWeek 22, WHO Grades 1-446 Percentage of participants
PlaceboWHO Bleeding ScaleWeek 14, WHO Grades 2-417 Percentage of participants
PlaceboWHO Bleeding ScaleDay 15, WHO Grades 1-468 Percentage of participants
PlaceboWHO Bleeding ScaleWeek 18, WHO Grades 2-418 Percentage of participants
PlaceboWHO Bleeding Scale1 Week Follow-up, WHO Grades 1-459 Percentage of participants
PlaceboWHO Bleeding ScaleWeek 22, WHO Grades 2-410 Percentage of participants
PlaceboWHO Bleeding ScaleWeek 26, WHO Grades 1-456 Percentage of participants
PlaceboWHO Bleeding ScaleWeek 26, WHO Grades 2-415 Percentage of participants
PlaceboWHO Bleeding Scale2 Week Follow-up, WHO Grades 1-456 Percentage of participants
PlaceboWHO Bleeding Scale1 Week Follow-up, WHO Grades 2-420 Percentage of participants
PlaceboWHO Bleeding ScaleDay 22, WHO Grades 1-467 Percentage of participants
PlaceboWHO Bleeding Scale2 Week Follow-up, WHO Grades 2-418 Percentage of participants
PlaceboWHO Bleeding Scale4 Week Follow-up, WHO Grades 1-459 Percentage of participants
PlaceboWHO Bleeding Scale4 Week Follow-up, WHO Grades 2-421 Percentage of participants
PlaceboWHO Bleeding ScaleWeek 10, WHO Grades 1-449 Percentage of participants
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDWHO Bleeding Scale4 Week Follow-up, WHO Grades 2-413 Percentage of participants
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDWHO Bleeding ScaleWeek 10, WHO Grades 1-422 Percentage of participants
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDWHO Bleeding ScaleWeek 14, WHO Grades 1-423 Percentage of participants
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDWHO Bleeding ScaleWeek 18, WHO Grades 1-422 Percentage of participants
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDWHO Bleeding ScaleDay 8, WHO Grades 2-416 Percentage of participants
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDWHO Bleeding ScaleBaseline, WHO Grades 1-473 Percentage of participants
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDWHO Bleeding ScaleDay 8, WHO Grades 1-456 Percentage of participants
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDWHO Bleeding ScaleDay 15, WHO Grades 1-439 Percentage of participants
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDWHO Bleeding ScaleDay 22, WHO Grades 1-438 Percentage of participants
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDWHO Bleeding ScaleDay 29, WHO Grades 1-437 Percentage of participants
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDWHO Bleeding ScaleDay 36, WHO Grades 1-423 Percentage of participants
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDWHO Bleeding ScaleDay 43, WHO Grades 1-423 Percentage of participants
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDWHO Bleeding ScaleWeek 22, WHO Grades 1-418 Percentage of participants
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDWHO Bleeding ScaleWeek 26, WHO Grades 1-422 Percentage of participants
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDWHO Bleeding Scale1 Week Follow-up, WHO Grades 1-428 Percentage of participants
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDWHO Bleeding Scale2 Week Follow-up, WHO Grades 1-450 Percentage of participants
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDWHO Bleeding Scale4 Week Follow-up, WHO Grades 1-446 Percentage of participants
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDWHO Bleeding ScaleBaseline, WHO Grades 2-422 Percentage of participants
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDWHO Bleeding ScaleDay 15, WHO Grades 2-48 Percentage of participants
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDWHO Bleeding ScaleDay 22, WHO Grades 2-411 Percentage of participants
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDWHO Bleeding ScaleDay 29, WHO Grades 2-410 Percentage of participants
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDWHO Bleeding ScaleDay 36, WHO Grades 2-47 Percentage of participants
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDWHO Bleeding ScaleDay 43, WHO Grades 2-45 Percentage of participants
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDWHO Bleeding ScaleWeek 10, WHO Grades 2-49 Percentage of participants
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDWHO Bleeding ScaleWeek 14, WHO Grades 2-45 Percentage of participants
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDWHO Bleeding ScaleWeek 18, WHO Grades 2-42 Percentage of participants
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDWHO Bleeding ScaleWeek 22, WHO Grades 2-48 Percentage of participants
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDWHO Bleeding ScaleWeek 26, WHO Grades 2-47 Percentage of participants
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDWHO Bleeding Scale1 Week Follow-up, WHO Grades 2-411 Percentage of participants
Eltrombopag 50 mg QDWHO Bleeding Scale2 Week Follow-up, WHO Grades 2-416 Percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 31, 2026