Bipolar Depression, Unipolar Depression
Conditions
Keywords
Cholinergic, Unipolar, Bipolar, Depression, Muscarinic, Scopolamine, Major Depressive Disorder, MDD, Bipolar Disorder, BP
Brief summary
A previous study showed that the intravenous administration of scopolamine produces antidepressant effects. This study is designed to determine if other routes of administration of scopolamine produce antidepressant effects.
Detailed description
Despite the availability of a wide range of antidepressant drugs, clinical trials indicate that 30% to 40% of patients with major depression fail to respond to first-line antidepressant treatment, despite adequate dosage, duration, and compliance. Moreover, in those patients who do experience symptomatic relief following conventional anti-depressant treatment, clinical improvement is not evident for 3-4 weeks. Thus, there is a clear need to develop novel and improved therapeutics for unipolar and bipolar depression. The cholinergic system is one of the neurotransmitter systems implicated in the pathophysiology of mood disorders. Evidence suggests that during major depressive episodes, the cholinergic system is hypersensitive to acetylcholine. Agents that enhance muscarinic cholinergic receptor function increase depressive symptoms in depressed subjects, and can produce symptoms of depression in healthy individuals. The preclinical literature more specifically implicates the muscarinic receptors and indicates that the use of muscarinic antagonists, in the context of animal models of depression, results in improvement in the behavioral analogs of depression. Preliminary results obtained under protocol 3-M-0108 provide strong evidence for the potential effectiveness of the anticholinergic scopolamine in rapidly producing clinically significant antidepressant effects. We observed large reductions in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores that occurred over hours/days following i.v. infusion of scopolamine, which stood in marked contrast to the 3-4 week period generally required for conventional therapies. Moreover, these improvements were observed in subjects who had been nonresponsive or incompletely responsive to conventional antidepressant therapies, highlighting the potential for this treatment to benefit a larger percentage of individuals with depression. The goal of this research project is to perform a clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of the muscarinic cholinergic receptor antagonist scopolamine administered via transdermal patch on clinical symptoms of depression.
Interventions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* INCLUSION CRITERIA: Two groups of subjects will be recruited for studies under this protocol: unipolar depressives and bipolar depressives. Subjects with unipolar or bipolar depression appear to exhibit abnormal cholinergic function during the depressed phase, and no differences are hypothesized to exist between MDD and BD depressives herein. However, while BD subjects are more difficult to recruit, the evidence for cholinergic abnormalities has been particularly compelling for BD. Moreover, observations from our pilot study suggest that scopolamine will improve symptoms in both MDD and BD, a particularly persuasive observation given BD notoriously has been difficult to treat. Thus, the magnitude of this serious clinical problem justifies the inclusion of BD subjects. Therefore both groups will be recruited. However, BD Type I subjects will be included only if they are currently stable on lithium or valproate to reduce the risks associated with possible precipitation of mania. The presence of inclusion and
Exclusion criteria
will be established using both an unstructured clinical interview with a psychiatrist and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID). Family history of mental illness will be obtained from the subject using the Family Interview of Genetic Studies. We will recruit 24 subjects per group. DEPRESSED SAMPLES: Subjects (ages 18-55) currently suffering from a major depressive episode falling into one of the following subgroups: 1. . MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER (MDD): Subjects will be selected with primary MDD and are currently depressed as defined by DSM-IV criteria for recurrent MDD and current MADRS score in the moderately-to-severely depressed range (greater than or equal to 20). The duration of the index episode is greater than or equal to four weeks. 2. . BIPOLAR DISORDER TYPE II (BD): Subjects will be selected who meet DSM-IV criteria for bipolar disorder Type I or II and are currently depressed, with MADRS score in the moderately-to-severely depressed range (greater than or equal to 20). The duration of the index episode is greater than or equal to four weeks.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Depression Severity | Outcome measures obtained at each of 12 sessions | The Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) has a range of scores from 0 to 60 where the highest values indicate the most depression. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale | Each of 12 sessions. | The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) has a range of scores from 0 to 56 where the highest values indicate the most anxiety. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Plac/Scop 6 administrations of placebo patch at 4 to 5 day intervals; followed by 6 administrations of scopolamine patch at 4 to 5 day intervals | 10 |
| Scop/Plac 6 administrations of scopolamine patch at 4 to 5 day intervals; followed by 6 administrations of placebo patch at 4 to 5 day intervals | 7 |
| Total | 17 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | expected side effects | 2 | 1 |
| Overall Study | W/drawl by investigators | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 4 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Plac/Scop | Scop/Plac | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 10 Participants | 7 Participants | 17 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 31 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6 | 33 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4 | 31.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2 |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 6 Participants | 6 Participants | 12 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 4 Participants | 1 Participants | 5 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 2 / 10 | 1 / 7 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 10 | 0 / 7 |
Outcome results
Change in Depression Severity
The Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) has a range of scores from 0 to 60 where the highest values indicate the most depression.
Time frame: Outcome measures obtained at each of 12 sessions
Population: Only participants who completed the trial were included in the analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plac/Scop | Change in Depression Severity | Block 1 - Session 6 | 20.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.5 |
| Plac/Scop | Change in Depression Severity | Block 1 - Session 1 | 29.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.5 |
| Plac/Scop | Change in Depression Severity | Block 1 - Session 2 | 26.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.2 |
| Plac/Scop | Change in Depression Severity | Block 1 - Session 3 | 24.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.7 |
| Plac/Scop | Change in Depression Severity | Block 1 - Session 4 | 19.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.6 |
| Plac/Scop | Change in Depression Severity | Block 1 - Session 5 | 19.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.4 |
| Plac/Scop | Change in Depression Severity | Block 2 - Session 1 | 23.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.7 |
| Plac/Scop | Change in Depression Severity | Block 2 - Session 2 | 18.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.8 |
| Plac/Scop | Change in Depression Severity | Block 2 - Session 3 | 19.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.3 |
| Plac/Scop | Change in Depression Severity | Block 2 - Session 4 | 18 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.1 |
| Plac/Scop | Change in Depression Severity | Block 2 - Session 5 | 16.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.9 |
| Plac/Scop | Change in Depression Severity | Block 2 - Session 6 | 15.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.8 |
| Scop/Plac | Change in Depression Severity | Block 2 - Session 5 | 16.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.7 |
| Scop/Plac | Change in Depression Severity | Block 2 - Session 1 | 27.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.9 |
| Scop/Plac | Change in Depression Severity | Block 1 - Session 1 | 30.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.2 |
| Scop/Plac | Change in Depression Severity | Block 1 - Session 6 | 28.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.2 |
| Scop/Plac | Change in Depression Severity | Block 2 - Session 4 | 17.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.1 |
| Scop/Plac | Change in Depression Severity | Block 1 - Session 2 | 29.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.5 |
| Scop/Plac | Change in Depression Severity | Block 2 - Session 2 | 23.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.7 |
| Scop/Plac | Change in Depression Severity | Block 1 - Session 3 | 31.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.9 |
| Scop/Plac | Change in Depression Severity | Block 2 - Session 6 | 20.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.3 |
| Scop/Plac | Change in Depression Severity | Block 1 - Session 4 | 27.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.5 |
| Scop/Plac | Change in Depression Severity | Block 2 - Session 3 | 20.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.5 |
| Scop/Plac | Change in Depression Severity | Block 1 - Session 5 | 27.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.6 |
Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale
The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) has a range of scores from 0 to 56 where the highest values indicate the most anxiety.
Time frame: Each of 12 sessions.
Population: Only study completers were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plac/Scop | Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale | Block 1 - Session 1 | 17.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.2 |
| Plac/Scop | Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale | Block 1 - Session 2 | 16.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.2 |
| Plac/Scop | Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale | Block 1 - Session 3 | 14.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.4 |
| Plac/Scop | Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale | Block 1 - Session 4 | 14.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.5 |
| Plac/Scop | Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale | Block 1 - Session 5 | 12.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5 |
| Plac/Scop | Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale | Block 1 - Session 6 | 17.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.1 |
| Plac/Scop | Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale | Block 2 - Session 1 | 14.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.2 |
| Plac/Scop | Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale | Block 2 - Session 2 | 13.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.8 |
| Plac/Scop | Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale | Block 2 - Session 3 | 14.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4 |
| Plac/Scop | Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale | Block 2 - Session 4 | 10.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.7 |
| Plac/Scop | Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale | Block 2 - Session 5 | 9.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.1 |
| Plac/Scop | Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale | Block 2 - Session 6 | 11.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.2 |
| Scop/Plac | Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale | Block 2 - Session 5 | 10.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6 |
| Scop/Plac | Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale | Block 1 - Session 1 | 20.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9 |
| Scop/Plac | Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale | Block 2 - Session 1 | 13.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.9 |
| Scop/Plac | Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale | Block 1 - Session 2 | 14.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.7 |
| Scop/Plac | Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale | Block 2 - Session 4 | 14.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9 |
| Scop/Plac | Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale | Block 1 - Session 3 | 14.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.7 |
| Scop/Plac | Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale | Block 2 - Session 2 | 12.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.6 |
| Scop/Plac | Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale | Block 1 - Session 4 | 13.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.8 |
| Scop/Plac | Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale | Block 2 - Session 6 | 11.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.9 |
| Scop/Plac | Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale | Block 1 - Session 5 | 12.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.7 |
| Scop/Plac | Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale | Block 2 - Session 3 | 13.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.6 |
| Scop/Plac | Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale | Block 1 - Session 6 | 11.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.3 |