Skip to content

The Antidepressant Efficacy of the Anticholinergic Scopolamine

The Antidepressant Efficacy of the Anticholinergic Scopolamine

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00369915
Enrollment
17
Registered
2006-08-30
Start date
2006-08-31
Completion date
2013-01-31
Last updated
2016-11-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bipolar Depression, Unipolar Depression

Keywords

Cholinergic, Unipolar, Bipolar, Depression, Muscarinic, Scopolamine, Major Depressive Disorder, MDD, Bipolar Disorder, BP

Brief summary

A previous study showed that the intravenous administration of scopolamine produces antidepressant effects. This study is designed to determine if other routes of administration of scopolamine produce antidepressant effects.

Detailed description

Despite the availability of a wide range of antidepressant drugs, clinical trials indicate that 30% to 40% of patients with major depression fail to respond to first-line antidepressant treatment, despite adequate dosage, duration, and compliance. Moreover, in those patients who do experience symptomatic relief following conventional anti-depressant treatment, clinical improvement is not evident for 3-4 weeks. Thus, there is a clear need to develop novel and improved therapeutics for unipolar and bipolar depression. The cholinergic system is one of the neurotransmitter systems implicated in the pathophysiology of mood disorders. Evidence suggests that during major depressive episodes, the cholinergic system is hypersensitive to acetylcholine. Agents that enhance muscarinic cholinergic receptor function increase depressive symptoms in depressed subjects, and can produce symptoms of depression in healthy individuals. The preclinical literature more specifically implicates the muscarinic receptors and indicates that the use of muscarinic antagonists, in the context of animal models of depression, results in improvement in the behavioral analogs of depression. Preliminary results obtained under protocol 3-M-0108 provide strong evidence for the potential effectiveness of the anticholinergic scopolamine in rapidly producing clinically significant antidepressant effects. We observed large reductions in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores that occurred over hours/days following i.v. infusion of scopolamine, which stood in marked contrast to the 3-4 week period generally required for conventional therapies. Moreover, these improvements were observed in subjects who had been nonresponsive or incompletely responsive to conventional antidepressant therapies, highlighting the potential for this treatment to benefit a larger percentage of individuals with depression. The goal of this research project is to perform a clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of the muscarinic cholinergic receptor antagonist scopolamine administered via transdermal patch on clinical symptoms of depression.

Interventions

DRUGScopolamine

Sponsors

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Lead SponsorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* INCLUSION CRITERIA: Two groups of subjects will be recruited for studies under this protocol: unipolar depressives and bipolar depressives. Subjects with unipolar or bipolar depression appear to exhibit abnormal cholinergic function during the depressed phase, and no differences are hypothesized to exist between MDD and BD depressives herein. However, while BD subjects are more difficult to recruit, the evidence for cholinergic abnormalities has been particularly compelling for BD. Moreover, observations from our pilot study suggest that scopolamine will improve symptoms in both MDD and BD, a particularly persuasive observation given BD notoriously has been difficult to treat. Thus, the magnitude of this serious clinical problem justifies the inclusion of BD subjects. Therefore both groups will be recruited. However, BD Type I subjects will be included only if they are currently stable on lithium or valproate to reduce the risks associated with possible precipitation of mania. The presence of inclusion and

Exclusion criteria

will be established using both an unstructured clinical interview with a psychiatrist and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID). Family history of mental illness will be obtained from the subject using the Family Interview of Genetic Studies. We will recruit 24 subjects per group. DEPRESSED SAMPLES: Subjects (ages 18-55) currently suffering from a major depressive episode falling into one of the following subgroups: 1. . MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER (MDD): Subjects will be selected with primary MDD and are currently depressed as defined by DSM-IV criteria for recurrent MDD and current MADRS score in the moderately-to-severely depressed range (greater than or equal to 20). The duration of the index episode is greater than or equal to four weeks. 2. . BIPOLAR DISORDER TYPE II (BD): Subjects will be selected who meet DSM-IV criteria for bipolar disorder Type I or II and are currently depressed, with MADRS score in the moderately-to-severely depressed range (greater than or equal to 20). The duration of the index episode is greater than or equal to four weeks.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Depression SeverityOutcome measures obtained at each of 12 sessionsThe Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) has a range of scores from 0 to 60 where the highest values indicate the most depression.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hamilton Anxiety Rating ScaleEach of 12 sessions.The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) has a range of scores from 0 to 56 where the highest values indicate the most anxiety.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Plac/Scop
6 administrations of placebo patch at 4 to 5 day intervals; followed by 6 administrations of scopolamine patch at 4 to 5 day intervals
10
Scop/Plac
6 administrations of scopolamine patch at 4 to 5 day intervals; followed by 6 administrations of placebo patch at 4 to 5 day intervals
7
Total17

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall Studyexpected side effects21
Overall StudyW/drawl by investigators01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject41

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlac/ScopScop/PlacTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
10 Participants7 Participants17 Participants
Age, Continuous31 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6
33 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4
31.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants6 Participants12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants1 Participants5 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 101 / 7
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 100 / 7

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Depression Severity

The Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) has a range of scores from 0 to 60 where the highest values indicate the most depression.

Time frame: Outcome measures obtained at each of 12 sessions

Population: Only participants who completed the trial were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Plac/ScopChange in Depression SeverityBlock 1 - Session 620.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.5
Plac/ScopChange in Depression SeverityBlock 1 - Session 129.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Plac/ScopChange in Depression SeverityBlock 1 - Session 226.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.2
Plac/ScopChange in Depression SeverityBlock 1 - Session 324.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
Plac/ScopChange in Depression SeverityBlock 1 - Session 419.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.6
Plac/ScopChange in Depression SeverityBlock 1 - Session 519.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.4
Plac/ScopChange in Depression SeverityBlock 2 - Session 123.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
Plac/ScopChange in Depression SeverityBlock 2 - Session 218.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.8
Plac/ScopChange in Depression SeverityBlock 2 - Session 319.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.3
Plac/ScopChange in Depression SeverityBlock 2 - Session 418 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.1
Plac/ScopChange in Depression SeverityBlock 2 - Session 516.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.9
Plac/ScopChange in Depression SeverityBlock 2 - Session 615.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.8
Scop/PlacChange in Depression SeverityBlock 2 - Session 516.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.7
Scop/PlacChange in Depression SeverityBlock 2 - Session 127.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.9
Scop/PlacChange in Depression SeverityBlock 1 - Session 130.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.2
Scop/PlacChange in Depression SeverityBlock 1 - Session 628.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.2
Scop/PlacChange in Depression SeverityBlock 2 - Session 417.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.1
Scop/PlacChange in Depression SeverityBlock 1 - Session 229.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Scop/PlacChange in Depression SeverityBlock 2 - Session 223.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.7
Scop/PlacChange in Depression SeverityBlock 1 - Session 331.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
Scop/PlacChange in Depression SeverityBlock 2 - Session 620.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.3
Scop/PlacChange in Depression SeverityBlock 1 - Session 427.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.5
Scop/PlacChange in Depression SeverityBlock 2 - Session 320.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.5
Scop/PlacChange in Depression SeverityBlock 1 - Session 527.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.6
Secondary

Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale

The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) has a range of scores from 0 to 56 where the highest values indicate the most anxiety.

Time frame: Each of 12 sessions.

Population: Only study completers were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Plac/ScopHamilton Anxiety Rating ScaleBlock 1 - Session 117.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.2
Plac/ScopHamilton Anxiety Rating ScaleBlock 1 - Session 216.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.2
Plac/ScopHamilton Anxiety Rating ScaleBlock 1 - Session 314.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.4
Plac/ScopHamilton Anxiety Rating ScaleBlock 1 - Session 414.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.5
Plac/ScopHamilton Anxiety Rating ScaleBlock 1 - Session 512.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5
Plac/ScopHamilton Anxiety Rating ScaleBlock 1 - Session 617.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.1
Plac/ScopHamilton Anxiety Rating ScaleBlock 2 - Session 114.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Plac/ScopHamilton Anxiety Rating ScaleBlock 2 - Session 213.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.8
Plac/ScopHamilton Anxiety Rating ScaleBlock 2 - Session 314.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4
Plac/ScopHamilton Anxiety Rating ScaleBlock 2 - Session 410.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
Plac/ScopHamilton Anxiety Rating ScaleBlock 2 - Session 59.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Plac/ScopHamilton Anxiety Rating ScaleBlock 2 - Session 611.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
Scop/PlacHamilton Anxiety Rating ScaleBlock 2 - Session 510.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6
Scop/PlacHamilton Anxiety Rating ScaleBlock 1 - Session 120.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9
Scop/PlacHamilton Anxiety Rating ScaleBlock 2 - Session 113.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.9
Scop/PlacHamilton Anxiety Rating ScaleBlock 1 - Session 214.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
Scop/PlacHamilton Anxiety Rating ScaleBlock 2 - Session 414.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9
Scop/PlacHamilton Anxiety Rating ScaleBlock 1 - Session 314.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.7
Scop/PlacHamilton Anxiety Rating ScaleBlock 2 - Session 212.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.6
Scop/PlacHamilton Anxiety Rating ScaleBlock 1 - Session 413.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
Scop/PlacHamilton Anxiety Rating ScaleBlock 2 - Session 611.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.9
Scop/PlacHamilton Anxiety Rating ScaleBlock 1 - Session 512.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.7
Scop/PlacHamilton Anxiety Rating ScaleBlock 2 - Session 313.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.6
Scop/PlacHamilton Anxiety Rating ScaleBlock 1 - Session 611.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.3

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026