Skip to content

Problem Adaptation Therapy (PATH) vs. Supportive Therapy in Treating Depressed, Cognitively Impaired Older Adults

A Treatment for Depressed, Cognitively Impaired Elders

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00368940
Enrollment
74
Registered
2006-08-29
Start date
2006-04-30
Completion date
2011-09-30
Last updated
2017-07-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Depression

Keywords

Memory Deficits, Geriatric Depression, Cognitive Impairment, Executive Dysfunction, Disability, Problem Solving Therapy

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the efficacy of Problem Adaptation Therapy (PATH) vs. Supportive Therapy for Cognitively Impaired (ST-CI) older adults in reducing depression and disability in treating depressed, cognitively impaired older adults.

Detailed description

Depression, cognitive impairment, and disability often coexist in older adults and can lead to patient suffering and family disruption. Moreover, many depressed, cognitively impaired older adults have slow, poor, or unstable response to antidepressant drugs. Despite the need for treatments other than medication, most psychotherapy research focuses on either cognitively intact patients with limited disability or on dementia patients with pronounced disability. Thus, the available treatments do not fully address the needs of the large number of depressed elders with intermediate cognitive impairment and disability. Previous studies with cognitively impaired psychiatric populations have taught participants compensatory strategies to overcome their behavioral and cognitive limitations. This study will evaluate the efficacy of Problem Adaptation Therapy (PATH) a type of psychotherapy using a problem solving therapy (PST) approach, specially tailored compensatory strategies and environmental adaptations and caregiver involvement in treating depressed, cognitively impaired older adults. All participants in this single-blind study will undergo initial evaluations, including a 2-hour interview to assess depression, memory, and physical functioning; questions about medical history; and a neuropsychological exam. Participants will then be randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: PATH or ST-CI. Participants assigned to PATH will receive 12 weekly sessions conducted at the home of the participants. During these sessions, a therapist will identify the participant's difficulties in life related to depression and physical functioning and will provide strategies to overcome these difficulties. The goal of treatment is to improve adaptive functioning in the home environment, which in turn may reduce depression and disability. The first session will last between 1 and 2 hours, and the remaining 11 sessions will last 1 hour. Participants assigned to ST-CI will also receive 12 weekly treatment sessions with a therapist conducted at the home of the participants. During supportive therapy sessions, the therapist will help participants to express feelings and to focus on their strengths and abilities when working through difficulties and transitions. For all participants, initial assessments will be repeated at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPATH

PATH utilizes a problem solving approach based on Problem Solving Therapy (PST) and identifies problems that interfere with everyday functions and that contribute to depression and disability. The treatment then provides compensatory strategies and environmental adaptations that are designed to bypass the person's cognitive limitations and to improve adaptive functioning in the home environment. PATH also incorporates caregiver involvement to help patient reduce depression and improve functioning.

BEHAVIORALST-CI

Supportive therapy focuses on the use of nonspecific or common factors of therapy, including facilitation of affect, helping the person feel understood, empathy, the treatment ritual, success experiences, and therapeutic optimism. In working with the participant, the therapist creates a supportive relationship and encourages the participant to consider his/her strengths and abilities rather than focusing on negative aspects of his/her character.

Sponsors

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
CollaboratorNIH
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Meets Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders(DSM)IV criteria for unipolar major depression * Severity of depression greater than or equal to 17 on MADRS * Disability as determined by at least 1 impairment in instrumental activities of daily living * Evidence of executive dysfunction or impairment in at least one of the following cognitive domains of Dementia Rating Scale (DRS): attention, construction, conceptualization, and memory (\[scaled score less than 7\] adjusted for age and race based on Mayo's older participants normative data) * Family member or caregiver able and willing to participate in treatment * Not currently taking antidepressants, cholinesterase inhibitors, or memantine or on a stable dosage for 8 weeks prior to study entry with no medical recommendation for change of these agents in the near future

Exclusion criteria

* High suicide risk * Axis I psychiatric disorder or substance abuse other than unipolar major depression or nonpsychotic depression * Axis II diagnosis of antisocial personality * Moderate to severe dementia: DRS total score corresponding to moderate or more severe impairment (scaled score less than or equal to 5) * Acute or severe medical illness (e.g., delirium; metastatic cancer; decompensated cardiac; liver or kidney failure; major surgery; stroke; myocardial infarction during the 3 months prior to entry) * Currently taking drugs known to cause depression (e.g., reserpine, alpha-methyl-dopa, steroids) * Currently receiving psychotherapy * Aphasia * Sensory problems * Inability to speak English

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Montgomery Asberg Depression Scale (MADRS)12 week outcomeMontgomery Asberg Depression Scale (MADRS) is a depression rating scale. Range of scores (1-35). Higher scores represent worse outcome (depression).
WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS)-II12-week outcomeWHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS)-II is a disability scale. Range of scores: 12-43. Higher scores represent worse outcome (disability).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hamilton Depression Rating ScaleOutcome at 12 weeksHamilton Depression Rating Scale is a scale measuring depression severity. Range of scores: 1-33. Higher scores reflect worse outcome (depression).
Sheehan Disability Scale.Outcome at 12 weeksSheehan Disability Scale is a measure of disability. Range of scores: 0-20. Higher scores reflect worse outcome (disability).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
PATH
Participants will receive PATH for 12 weeks PATH: PATH aims to improve emotion regulation and reduce the negative impact of behavioral and functional limitations. The strategies of PATH are consistent with the process model of emotion regulation. PATH utilizes a problem solving approach based on Problem Solving Therapy (PST) and identifies problems that interfere with everyday functions and that contribute to depression and disability. The treatment then provides compensatory strategies and environmental adaptations that are designed to bypass the person's cognitive limitations and to improve adaptive functioning in the home environment. PATH also incorporates caregiver involvement to help patient reduce depression and improve functioning.
37
ST-CI
Participants will receive ST-CI for 12 weeks ST-CI: Supportive therapy focuses on the use of nonspecific or common factors of therapy, including facilitation of affect, helping the person feel understood, empathy, the treatment ritual, success experiences, and therapeutic optimism. In working with the participant, the therapist creates a supportive relationship and encourages the participant to consider his/her strengths and abilities rather than focusing on negative aspects of his/her character.
37
Total74

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicST-CITotalPATH
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
37 Participants74 Participants37 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
37 Participants71 Participants34 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
6 Participants13 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
31 Participants61 Participants30 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
37 participants74 participants37 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
25 Participants51 Participants26 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants23 Participants11 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 371 / 37
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 370 / 37
serious
Total, serious adverse events
8 / 3710 / 37

Outcome results

Primary

Montgomery Asberg Depression Scale (MADRS)

Montgomery Asberg Depression Scale (MADRS) is a depression rating scale. Range of scores (1-35). Higher scores represent worse outcome (depression).

Time frame: 12 week outcome

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PATHMontgomery Asberg Depression Scale (MADRS)10.46 Units on MADRS scaleStandard Error 1.07
ST-CIMontgomery Asberg Depression Scale (MADRS)15.53 Units on MADRS scaleStandard Error 1.07
p-value: 0.00595% CI: [0.13, 1.06]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS)-II

WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS)-II is a disability scale. Range of scores: 12-43. Higher scores represent worse outcome (disability).

Time frame: 12-week outcome

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PATHWHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS)-II27.37 WHODAS-II unitsStandard Error 1.16
ST-CIWHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS)-II32.14 WHODAS-II unitsStandard Error 1.15
p-value: 0.00195% CI: [0.2, 1.14]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Hamilton Depression Rating Scale

Hamilton Depression Rating Scale is a scale measuring depression severity. Range of scores: 1-33. Higher scores reflect worse outcome (depression).

Time frame: Outcome at 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PATHHamilton Depression Rating Scale11.16 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.9
ST-CIHamilton Depression Rating Scale15.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.3
p-value: 0.0268Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Sheehan Disability Scale.

Sheehan Disability Scale is a measure of disability. Range of scores: 0-20. Higher scores reflect worse outcome (disability).

Time frame: Outcome at 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PATHSheehan Disability Scale.5.40 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.91
ST-CISheehan Disability Scale.12.16 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.87
p-value: <0.0001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 11, 2026