Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) Tablets in Grass Pollen Rhinoconjunctivitis

Randomised,Double-blind,Placebo-controlled,Multinational,Multi-centre,Phase IIb/III Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Three Doses of Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) Administered as Tablets Once Daily to Patients Suffering From Grass Pollen Rhinoconjunctivitis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00367640
Enrollment
628
Registered
2006-08-23
Start date
2004-11-30
Completion date
2005-09-30
Last updated
2016-05-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Allergy

Keywords

Sublingual immunotherapy, Grass pollen tablet, Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis

Brief summary

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of SLIT compared with placebo for reduction of symptoms and rescue medication usage

Interventions

DRUG100 IR grass pollen allergen extract tablet

One sublingual tablet daily during 4 months before pollen season and during pollen season

One sublingual tablet daily during 4 months before pollen season and during pollen season

DRUG500 IR grass pollen allergen extract tablet

One sublingual tablet daily during 4 months before pollen season and during pollen season

DRUGPlacebo tablet

One sublingual tablet daily during 4 months before pollen season and during pollen season

Sponsors

Stallergenes Greer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Written consent * Grass-pollen related allergic rhinoconjunctivitis for at least the last 2 pollen seasons. * Sensitised to grass pollen (positive SPT and RAST level of at least class 2). * Total symptom score of the RRTSS during the previous pollen season greater than or equal to 12. * Safety laboratory resuts within the references ranges

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy, breast-feeding/lactation * Had received desensitisation treatment for grass pollen * Treatment by immunotherapy with another allergen within the previous 5 years * Usual contraindications of immunotherapy such as serious immunopathologic conditions or malignancies * Treated with beta-blockers or under continuous corticotherapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Average Rhinoconjunctivitis Total Symptom ScorePollen period (average of 32 days in the ITT set)Average Rhinoconjunctivitis Total Symptom Score during the pollen period while participant on treatment. Participants assessed daily, during the pollen period, 6 rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms (sneezing, rhinorrhea, nasal pruritus, nasal congestion, ocular pruritus and watery eyes) each symptom is scored as follows: 0: no symptoms, 1: mild symptoms, 2: moderate symptoms, 3: severe symptoms. The sum of the 6 symptoms is the Rhinoconjunctivitis Total Symptom Score (RTSS) (range 0-18). The lower the score, the better the outcome.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

First Patient First Visit 30 NOV 2004, Last Patient Last Visit 05 SEP 2005

Participants by arm

ArmCount
100 IR
100 IR grass pollen allergen extract tablet
142
300 IR
300 IR grass pollen allergen extract tablet
136
500 IR
500 IR grass pollen allergen extract tablet
143
Placebo
Placebo tablet
148
Total569

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event3680
Overall StudyAny other reason not above-mentioned7534
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject81186

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic100 IR300 IR500 IRPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous29.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.9
28.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.34
30.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.45
29.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6
29.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.34
Sex: Female, Male
Female
69 Participants62 Participants54 Participants60 Participants245 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
73 Participants74 Participants89 Participants88 Participants324 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
74 / 16070 / 15576 / 15736 / 156
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 1601 / 1550 / 1570 / 156

Outcome results

Primary

Average Rhinoconjunctivitis Total Symptom Score

Average Rhinoconjunctivitis Total Symptom Score during the pollen period while participant on treatment. Participants assessed daily, during the pollen period, 6 rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms (sneezing, rhinorrhea, nasal pruritus, nasal congestion, ocular pruritus and watery eyes) each symptom is scored as follows: 0: no symptoms, 1: mild symptoms, 2: moderate symptoms, 3: severe symptoms. The sum of the 6 symptoms is the Rhinoconjunctivitis Total Symptom Score (RTSS) (range 0-18). The lower the score, the better the outcome.

Time frame: Pollen period (average of 32 days in the ITT set)

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all patients who received at least one dose of investigational product and had a Retrospective Rhinoconjunctivitis Total Symptom Score (RRTSS) and at least one Rhinoconjunctivitis Total Symptom Score (RTSS) in the pollen period while on treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
100 IRAverage Rhinoconjunctivitis Total Symptom Score4.72 Units on a scale (range: 0 to 18)Standard Deviation 3.141
300 IRAverage Rhinoconjunctivitis Total Symptom Score3.58 Units on a scale (range: 0 to 18)Standard Deviation 2.976
500 IRAverage Rhinoconjunctivitis Total Symptom Score3.74 Units on a scale (range: 0 to 18)Standard Deviation 3.142
PlaceboAverage Rhinoconjunctivitis Total Symptom Score4.93 Units on a scale (range: 0 to 18)Standard Deviation 3.229
Comparison: A step-down approach is performed to address the multiplicity issue.p-value: 0.0006ANCOVA
Comparison: A step-down approach is performed to address the multiplicity issue.p-value: 0.0001ANCOVA
Comparison: A step-down approach is performed to address the multiplicity issue.p-value: 0.4606ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 11, 2026