Skip to content

Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of a Once-daily Dose of Tigecycline vs Ertapenem in Diabetic Foot Infections (DFI) With a Substudy in Patients With Diabetic Foot Infections Complicated by Osteomyelitis.

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Comparison Study of the Safety and Efficacy of a Once-Daily Dose of Tigecycline Versus Ertapenem for the Treatment of Foot Infections in Subjects With Diabetes

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00366249
Enrollment
1061
Registered
2006-08-21
Start date
2007-01-31
Completion date
2009-03-31
Last updated
2010-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bacterial Infections, Diabetic Foot, Osteomyelitis

Keywords

Diabetic foot infection, Osteomyelitis, Diabetes Complications, Foot ulcer, Skin infection

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to look at the safety and effectiveness of a once-daily dose of tigecycline compared to ertapenem for the treatment of diabetic foot infections. The co-primary efficacy endpoints were not met.

Interventions

DRUGTigecycline

150 mg Tigecycline once-daily IV infusion for up to 28 days, or 42 days for the substudy wth osteomyelitis

DRUGErtapenem

Ertapenem 1g IV infusion every 24 hours +/- vancomycin depending on culture results and at the discretion of investigator (for coverage of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) or enterococci coverage).

Sponsors

Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Main inclusion criteria: * Men and women aged 18 or older with diabetes and a qualifying foot infection. People with evidence of a diabetic foot infection with osteomyelitis may qualify for the osteomyelitis substudy arm. Main

Exclusion criteria

* People with additional significant disease, infection with resistant pathogens, contraindication, or hypersensitivity to any test article or related antibiotic.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients With Clinical Response of Cure Vs. Failure.Test of cure visit (TOC): Assessed at least 12 days post last doseCure: Recovery so no added antibiotic therapy. Failure: Added antibiotic therapy for no response or worsening after improvement, new purulence, \>120% doses, non-routine surgical treatment or death related to Diabetic Foot Infections (DFI) \> 48 hrs.
Number of Patients With Clinical Response of Cure Vs. Failure/Indeterminate.Test of cure visit (TOC): Assessed at least 12 days post last doseCure: Recovery so no added antibiotic therapy. Failure: Added antibiotic therapy for no response or worsening after improvement, new purulence, \>120% doses, non-routine surgical treatment or death related to DFI \> 48 hrs. Indeterminate: Lost to follow-up, death\<48 hours or noninfection related.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients With Clinical Response of Cure Vs. Failure Assessed at Least 25 - 27 Weeks Post Last Dose.Test of cure visit (TOC): Assessed at least 25 - 27 weeks post last doseCure: Recovery so no added antibiotic therapy. Failure: Added antibiotic therapy for no response or worsening after improvement, new purulence, \>120% doses, non-routine surgical treatment or death related to DFI \> 48 hrs.
Number of Patients With Clinical Response of Cure Vs. Failure/Indeterminate Assessed at Least 25 - 27 Weeks Post Last Dose.Test of cure visit (TOC): Assessed at least 25 - 27 weeks post last doseCure: Recovery so no added antibiotic therapy. Failure: Added antibiotic therapy for no response or worsening after improvement, new purulence, \>120% doses, non-routine surgical treatment or death related to DFI \> 48 hrs. Indeterminate: Lost to follow-up, death\<48 hours or noninfection related.
Number of Patients With Microbiologic Response of Eradication.Test of cure visit (TOC): Assessed at least 12 days post last doseEradication defined as: no pathogen is present in the repeat culture from the original site of infection, or a clinical response of the cure precludes the availability of a specimen for culture.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Croatia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, India, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Mexico, Panama, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Slovakia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Turkey (Türkiye), Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients were recruited worldwide from January 2007 to February 2009.

Pre-assignment details

Patients were screened for up to 24 hours.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Tigecycline
Tigecycline 150 mg IV infusion every 24 hours
553
Ertapenem
Ertapenem 1g IV infusion every 24 hours +/- vancomycin depending on culture results and at the discretion of investigator (for coverage of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) or enterococci coverage).
508
Total1,061

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event5328
Overall StudyDeath01
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy2121
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up20
Overall StudyMost due to osteomylitis status3120
Overall StudyPhysician Decision52
Overall StudyProtocol Violation12
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject184

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTigecyclineErtapenemTotal
Age Continuous59.36 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.04
58.75 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7
59.07 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.88
Sex: Female, Male
Female
199 Participants165 Participants364 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
354 Participants343 Participants697 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
406 / —292 / —
serious
Total, serious adverse events
79 / —62 / —

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Patients With Clinical Response of Cure Vs. Failure.

Cure: Recovery so no added antibiotic therapy. Failure: Added antibiotic therapy for no response or worsening after improvement, new purulence, \>120% doses, non-routine surgical treatment or death related to Diabetic Foot Infections (DFI) \> 48 hrs.

Time frame: Test of cure visit (TOC): Assessed at least 12 days post last dose

Population: Clinically evaluable population without osteomyelitis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TigecyclineNumber of Patients With Clinical Response of Cure Vs. Failure.Cure316 patients
TigecyclineNumber of Patients With Clinical Response of Cure Vs. Failure.Failure92 patients
ErtapenemNumber of Patients With Clinical Response of Cure Vs. Failure.Cure334 patients
ErtapenemNumber of Patients With Clinical Response of Cure Vs. Failure.Failure71 patients
Comparison: Analysis provided for Cure95% CI: [-11, 0.1]
Primary

Number of Patients With Clinical Response of Cure Vs. Failure/Indeterminate.

Cure: Recovery so no added antibiotic therapy. Failure: Added antibiotic therapy for no response or worsening after improvement, new purulence, \>120% doses, non-routine surgical treatment or death related to DFI \> 48 hrs. Indeterminate: Lost to follow-up, death\<48 hours or noninfection related.

Time frame: Test of cure visit (TOC): Assessed at least 12 days post last dose

Population: Clinical modified intent to treat population without osteomyelitis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TigecyclineNumber of Patients With Clinical Response of Cure Vs. Failure/Indeterminate.Cure340 patients
TigecyclineNumber of Patients With Clinical Response of Cure Vs. Failure/Indeterminate.Failure117 patients
TigecyclineNumber of Patients With Clinical Response of Cure Vs. Failure/Indeterminate.Indeterminate19 patients
ErtapenemNumber of Patients With Clinical Response of Cure Vs. Failure/Indeterminate.Cure363 patients
ErtapenemNumber of Patients With Clinical Response of Cure Vs. Failure/Indeterminate.Failure86 patients
ErtapenemNumber of Patients With Clinical Response of Cure Vs. Failure/Indeterminate.Indeterminate17 patients
Comparison: Analysis provided for Cure95% CI: [-12.3, -1.1]
Secondary

Number of Patients With Clinical Response of Cure Vs. Failure Assessed at Least 25 - 27 Weeks Post Last Dose.

Cure: Recovery so no added antibiotic therapy. Failure: Added antibiotic therapy for no response or worsening after improvement, new purulence, \>120% doses, non-routine surgical treatment or death related to DFI \> 48 hrs.

Time frame: Test of cure visit (TOC): Assessed at least 25 - 27 weeks post last dose

Population: Clinically evaluable population with osteomyelitis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TigecyclineNumber of Patients With Clinical Response of Cure Vs. Failure Assessed at Least 25 - 27 Weeks Post Last Dose.Cure12 patients
TigecyclineNumber of Patients With Clinical Response of Cure Vs. Failure Assessed at Least 25 - 27 Weeks Post Last Dose.Failure26 patients
ErtapenemNumber of Patients With Clinical Response of Cure Vs. Failure Assessed at Least 25 - 27 Weeks Post Last Dose.Cure13 patients
ErtapenemNumber of Patients With Clinical Response of Cure Vs. Failure Assessed at Least 25 - 27 Weeks Post Last Dose.Failure11 patients
Secondary

Number of Patients With Clinical Response of Cure Vs. Failure/Indeterminate Assessed at Least 25 - 27 Weeks Post Last Dose.

Cure: Recovery so no added antibiotic therapy. Failure: Added antibiotic therapy for no response or worsening after improvement, new purulence, \>120% doses, non-routine surgical treatment or death related to DFI \> 48 hrs. Indeterminate: Lost to follow-up, death\<48 hours or noninfection related.

Time frame: Test of cure visit (TOC): Assessed at least 25 - 27 weeks post last dose

Population: Clinical modified intent to treat population with osteomyelitis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TigecyclineNumber of Patients With Clinical Response of Cure Vs. Failure/Indeterminate Assessed at Least 25 - 27 Weeks Post Last Dose.Cure19 patients
TigecyclineNumber of Patients With Clinical Response of Cure Vs. Failure/Indeterminate Assessed at Least 25 - 27 Weeks Post Last Dose.Failure27 patients
TigecyclineNumber of Patients With Clinical Response of Cure Vs. Failure/Indeterminate Assessed at Least 25 - 27 Weeks Post Last Dose.Indeterminate7 patients
ErtapenemNumber of Patients With Clinical Response of Cure Vs. Failure/Indeterminate Assessed at Least 25 - 27 Weeks Post Last Dose.Cure21 patients
ErtapenemNumber of Patients With Clinical Response of Cure Vs. Failure/Indeterminate Assessed at Least 25 - 27 Weeks Post Last Dose.Failure12 patients
ErtapenemNumber of Patients With Clinical Response of Cure Vs. Failure/Indeterminate Assessed at Least 25 - 27 Weeks Post Last Dose.Indeterminate0 patients
Secondary

Number of Patients With Microbiologic Response of Eradication.

Eradication defined as: no pathogen is present in the repeat culture from the original site of infection, or a clinical response of the cure precludes the availability of a specimen for culture.

Time frame: Test of cure visit (TOC): Assessed at least 12 days post last dose

Population: Microbiologically evaluable population without osteomyelitis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TigecyclineNumber of Patients With Microbiologic Response of Eradication.209 patients
ErtapenemNumber of Patients With Microbiologic Response of Eradication.229 patients
95% CI: [-13.6, 1]

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026