Skip to content

Study of Aripiprazole in the Treatment of Serious Behavioral Problems in Children and Adolescents With Autistic Disorder (AD)

A 52-Week, Open-Label, Multicenter Study of the Safety and Tolerability of Aripiprazole Flexibly Dosed in the Treatment of Children and Adolescents With Autistic Disorder

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00365859
Enrollment
330
Registered
2006-08-18
Start date
2006-09-01
Completion date
2009-06-01
Last updated
2026-08-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Autistic Disorder, Behavioral Symptoms

Keywords

Serious behavioral problems in children and adolescents with AD, behavioral problems

Brief summary

This study will provide long-term safety data for patients who are taking aripiprazole for up to 1 year. Most patients enrolled in this study will have participated in a short-term study with aripiprazole (CN138-178 \[NCT00332241\] or CN138-179 \[NCT00337571\]).

Interventions

DRUGAripiprazole

Tablets, Oral, 2, 5, 10, or 15 mg, once daily, 52 weeks

Sponsors

Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY
Otsuka America Pharmaceutical
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

- Rollover: * Completed 8 weeks of treatment in one of the following double-blind clinical trials: CN138-178 \[NCT00332241\] or CN138-179 \[NCT00337571\] * No significant protocol violations and sufficient medical justification to continue on open-label treatment with aripiprazole Inclusion Criteria - De Novo: * Meets current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV TR) diagnostic criteria for AD and demonstrates serious behavioral problems - diagnosis confirmed by Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R) or the patient meets the current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV TR) diagnostic criteria for AD and has a history of behavioral problems that are currently being treated with psychotropic medication * Mental age of at least 18 months * Male or female 6 to 17 years of age, inclusive, at the time of enrollment

Exclusion criteria

* Patients considered treatment resistant to neuroleptic medication based on lack of therapeutic response to 2 different neuroleptics after treatment of at least 3 weeks each * Patients previously treated and not responding to aripiprazole treatment * The patient is currently diagnosed with another disorder on the autism spectrum, including pervasive developmental disorder-not otherwise specified (PDD-NOS), Asperger's Disorder, Rett's Disorder, Fragile-X Syndrome or Childhood Disintegrative Disorder * Current diagnosis of bipolar disorder, psychosis, schizophrenia, or major depression * A seizure in the past year * History of severe head trauma or stroke * Non-pharmacologic therapy (e.g. psychotherapy, behavior modification) should be stable prior to screening and consistent throughout the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Deaths, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, Extra Pyramidal Syndrome (EPS)-Related AEsFrom Screening (up to 42 days prior to treatment start) through Week 52 (end of study) for SAEs; from Week 0 (Baseline) through Week 52 (End of Study) for AEsParticipants with Adverse Events (AEs), Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), and AEs leading to study discontinuation. AE is defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition. SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a cancer, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, results in the development of drug dependency or drug abuse, is an important medical event.
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52Baseline, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52The SAS is a 10-item instrument used to evaluate the presence and severity of parkinsonian symptomatology. It is the most commonly used rating scale for Parkinsonism in clinical trials over the past 25 years. The ten items focus on rigidity rather than bradykinesia, and do not assess subjective rigidity or slowness. Items are rated for severity on a 0-4 scale, with definitions given for each anchor point. The total SAS Score has a possible range from 10 to 50. Negative change scores indicate improvement.
Mean Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52Baseline, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52The AIMS is an assessment of movement dysfunctions. It is a 12-item instrument assessing abnormal involuntary movements associated with antipsychotic drugs and 'spontaneous' motor disturbance related to the illness itself. Scoring the AIMS consists of rating the severity of movement in 3 main anatomic areas (facial/oral, extremities, and trunk), based on a five-point scale (0=none, 4=severe). The AIMS Total Score has a possible range from 0 to 28. Negative change scores indicate improvement in movement dysfunction.
Mean Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Global Clinical Assessment at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52, and EndpointBaseline, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52The Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale is a 4-item scale to assess presence and severity of drug-induced akathisia, including both objective items and subjective items, together with a global clinical assessment of akathisia. Global assessment is made on a scale of 0 to 5 with comprehensive definitions provided for each anchor point on scale: 0=absent; 1=questionable; 2=mild akathisia; 3=moderate akathisia; 4=marked akathisia; 5=severe akathisia. Score has a possible range from 0 (absent) to 5 (severe akathisia). Negative change scores indicate improvement in akathisia.
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesAt screening (up to 42 days prior to treatment start), Week 8, Week 26, Week 52Abnormal metabolic criterion values include the following: fasting serum glucose ≥115 mg/dL; non-fasting serum glucose ≥ 200 mg/dL; total cholesterol ≥240 mg/dL; LDL cholesterol ≥160 mg/dL; HDL cholesterol ≤30 mg/dL; triglycerides ≥120 mg/dL (females), ≥160 mg/dL (males)
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology AbnormalitiesAt screening (up to 42 days prior to treatment start), Week 8, Week 26, Week 52Abnormal hematology criterion values include the following: hematocrit (ages 6-17, males \& females) ≤33%; hemoglobin (ages 6-17, males \& females) \<11.3 g/dL; leukocytes ≤2800 c/mm3 or ≥16000 c/mm3; eosinophils (ages 6-17, males \& females) \>17%; neutrophils \<15%; platelet count ≤75,000 c/mm3 or ≥700,000 c/mm3
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesAt screening (up to 42 days prior to treatment start), Week 8, Week 26, Week 52Abnormal chemistry criterion values include the following: aspartate aminotransferase ≥3x upper limit of normal (ULN); alanine aminotransferase ≥3x ULN; alkaline phosphatase ≥3x ULN; lactate dehydrogenase ≥3x ULN; creatinine ≥2.0 mg/dL; uric acid, ≥10.5 mg/dL (male), ≥8.5 mg/dL (female); bilirubin (Total) ≥2.0 mg/dL; serum prolactin \>ULN; creatine kinase ≥3x ULN; blood urea nitrogen ≥30 mg/dL; sodium ≤126 mEq/L or ≥156 mEq/L; potassium ≤2.5 mEq/L or ≥ 6.5 mEq/L; chloride ≤90 mEq/L or ≥118 mEq/L; calcium ≤8.2 mg/dL or ≥12 mg/dL
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesAt screening (up to 42 days prior to treatment start), Week 8, Week 26, Week 52These abbreviations are used in the table of ECG measurements: supraventricular (SV), baseline (BL), 1 degree (1°), atrioventricular (A-V), intraventricular (IVT), symmetrical (SYM), corrected QT interval (QTc). QRS complex is a recording of a single heartbeat on ECG corresponding to the depolarization of the right and left ventricles. PR interval is measured from beginning of P wave to beginning of QRS complex. QT interval is a measure of time between start of Q wave and end of T wave in the heart's electrical cycle. ↑ = increase from baseline, ↓ = decrease from baseline, → = "to"
Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesAt screening (up to 42 days prior to treatment start), Week 0 (Baseline), Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 14, Week 20, Week 26, Week 34, Week 42, Week 52 (Endpoint)Clinically significantly abnormal vital signs met age-appropriate (heart rate cohorts: ages 5-14 \& ages 15+; blood pressure cohorts: ages 6-12 \& ages 13-17) criterion AND represented change from pretreatment value of at least the following magnitudes: systolic blood pressure (≥130 mmHg \& ≥144 mmHg w/ increase of ≥20 mmHg) or (≤117 mmHg \& ≤120 mmHg w/ decrease of ≥20 mmHg); diastolic blood pressure (≥86 mmHg \& ≥92 mmHg w/ increase of ≥15 mmHg) or (≤75 mm Hg \& ≤80 mmHg w/ decrease of ≥15 mmHg); heart rate (140 bpm and 120 bpm w/ increase of ≥15 bpm) or (50 bpm and 50 bpm w/ decrease of ≥15 bpm).
Mean Change From Baseline in Patient WeightAt screening (up to 42 days prior to treatment start), Week 0 (Baseline), Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 14, Week 20, Week 26, Week 34, Week 42, Week 52 (Endpoint)
Mean Change From Baseline by Time Period in Body Weight Z-ScoreAt screening (up to 42 days prior to treatment start), Week 0 (Baseline), Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 14, Week 20, Week 26, Week 34, Week 42, Week 52 (Endpoint)The Z-Score indicates how many standard deviations a person is from the population norm values. The body weight z-scores are designed to take into account the amount of weight gain that would be expected due to normal growth in children and adolescents. The body weight z-scores are by age and gender standardized values (corresponding to a normal distribution with mean 0 and a standard deviation of 1) of the actual weight measurements, based on the Growth Charts provided by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC; see Links section of this record). Subjects included in the period evaluation had a baseline and at least 1 measurement within the time period that was assessed. Patients are only counted once in each time period but can appear in multiple time periods. For those with multiple records in 1 time period, only the last record in that period is included in calculations.
Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Body Mass Index (BMI)At screening (up to 42 days prior to treatment start), Week 0 (Baseline), Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 14, Week 20, Week 26, Week 34, Week 42, Week 52 (Endpoint)The body mass index (BMI) is a statistical measurement which compares a person's weight and height. Though it does not actually measure the percentage of body fat, it is used to estimate a healthy body weight based on subject height.
Mean Change From Baseline By Time Period in BMI Z-ScoreAt screening (up to 42 days prior to treatment start), Week 0 (Baseline), Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 14, Week 20, Week 26, Week 34, Week 42, Week 52 (Endpoint)The Z-Score indicates how many standard deviations a person is from the population norm values. The BMI z-scores are designed to take into account the BMI that would be expected due to normal growth in children and adolescents. The BMI z-scores are by age and gender standardized values (corresponding to a normal distribution with mean 0 and a standard deviation of 1) of the actual BMI measurements, based on the Growth Charts provided by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC; see Links section of this record). Subjects included in the period evaluation had a baseline and at least 1 measurement within the time period that was assessed. Patients are only counted once in each time period but can appear in multiple time periods. For those with multiple records in 1 time period, only the last record in that period is included in calculations.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression (CGI)-Severity Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Week 0 (Baseline), Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)CGI scale is a global evaluation of improvement over time. CGI-Severity (CGI-S) is a clinician-rated assessment that evaluates the severity of a patient's condition on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (no symptoms) to 7 (very severe symptoms). CGI-Severity score is from 1 to 7. A negative change score signifies improvement.
CGI-Improvement Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)CGI scale is a global evaluation of improvement over time. CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) is a clinician rated assessment that evaluates improvement relative to symptoms at baseline on a a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). CGI-I Score is from 1 to 7. A lower score signifies larger improvement.
Mean Change From Baseline in Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) Irritability Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Week 0 (Baseline), Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)The ABC is an informant-based symptom checklist for assessing and classifying problem behaviors of children and adolescents with mental retardation. The 58 items are rated on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all a problem to 3 = the problem is severe in degree), and resolve into 5 subscales: (1) irritability and agitation; (2) lethargy and social withdrawal; (3) stereotypic behavior; (4) hyperactivity and noncompliance, and (5) inappropriate speech. ABC Irritability Subscale Score is from 0 to 45. A negative change signifies improvement
Mean Change From Baseline in ABC Hyperactivity Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Week 0 (Baseline), Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)The ABC is an informant-based symptom checklist for assessing and classifying problem behaviors of children and adolescents with mental retardation. The 58 items are rated on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all a problem to 3 = the problem is severe in degree), and resolve into 5 subscales: (1) irritability and agitation; (2) lethargy and social withdrawal; (3) stereotypic behavior; (4) hyperactivity and noncompliance, and (5) inappropriate speech. ABC Hyperactivity Subscale Score is from 0 to 48. A negative change score signifies improvement.
Change From Baseline in ABC Stereotypy Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Week 0 (Baseline), Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)The ABC is an informant-based symptom checklist for assessing and classifying problem behaviors of children and adolescents with mental retardation. The 58 items are rated on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all a problem to 3 = the problem is severe in degree), and resolve into 5 subscales: (1) irritability and agitation; (2) lethargy and social withdrawal; (3) stereotypic behavior; (4) hyperactivity and noncompliance, and (5) inappropriate speech. ABC Stereotypy Subscale Score is from 0 to 21. A negative change score signifies improvement.
Mean Change From Baseline in ABC Social Withdrawal Scale At Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Week 0 (Baseline), Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)The ABC is an informant-based symptom checklist for assessing and classifying problem behaviors of children and adolescents with mental retardation. The 58 items are rated on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all a problem to 3 = the problem is severe in degree), and resolve into 5 subscales: (1) irritability and agitation; (2) lethargy and social withdrawal; (3) stereotypic behavior; (4) hyperactivity and noncompliance, and (5) inappropriate speech. ABC Social Withdrawal Subscale Score is from 0 to 48. A negative change score signifies improvement.
Mean Change From Baseline in ABC Inappropriate Speech Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Week 0 (Baseline), Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)The ABC is an informant-based symptom checklist for assessing and classifying problem behaviors of children and adolescents with mental retardation. The 58 items are rated on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all a problem to 3 = the problem is severe in degree), and resolve into 5 subscales: (1) irritability and agitation; (2) lethargy and social withdrawal; (3) stereotypic behavior; (4) hyperactivity and noncompliance, and (5) inappropriate speech. ABC Inappropriate Speech Subscale score is from 1 to 12. A negative change score signifies improvement.
Change From Baseline in Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS) Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Week 0 (Baseline), Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)CY-BOCS is a 10-item, clinician-rated scale designed to measure the severity of obsessive-compulsive symptoms in patients below the age of 18. The scale contains 5 items pertaining to obsessions (which were not used in this trial) and 5 items pertaining to compulsions, which rated each symptom domain in terms of time spent, interference with functioning, distress, resistance, and control. Each item was rated on a 5-point scale, from 0 (no symptoms or minimum severity) to 4 (extreme symptoms or maximum severity). CY-BOCS Score is from 0 to 20. A negative change score signifies improvement.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

109 participants were enrolled in the De Novo arm, 70 in the Rollover Placebo arm, and 174 in the Rollover Aripiprazole arm. 23 participants in the De Novo arm were considered "baseline failures," and did not enter the treatment phase.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
De Novo
As previously described in Participant Flow
86
Rollover Placebo
As previously described in Participant Flow
70
Rollover Aripiprazole
As previously described in Participant Flow
174
Total330

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDe NovoRollover PlaceboRollover AripiprazoleTotal
Age, Continuous9.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.13
9.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.95
9.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3
9.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.02
Age, Customized
13 to 17 years
17 Participants14 Participants36 Participants67 Participants
Age, Customized
6 to 12 years
69 Participants56 Participants138 Participants263 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
16 Participants8 Participants19 Participants43 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
70 Participants62 Participants155 Participants287 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
other
Total, other adverse events
73 / 86136 / 17461 / 70
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 865 / 1741 / 70

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Change From Baseline By Time Period in BMI Z-Score

The Z-Score indicates how many standard deviations a person is from the population norm values. The BMI z-scores are designed to take into account the BMI that would be expected due to normal growth in children and adolescents. The BMI z-scores are by age and gender standardized values (corresponding to a normal distribution with mean 0 and a standard deviation of 1) of the actual BMI measurements, based on the Growth Charts provided by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC; see Links section of this record).

Time frame: At screening (up to 42 days prior to treatment start), Week 0 (Baseline), Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 14, Week 20, Week 26, Week 34, Week 42, Week 52 (Endpoint)

Population: Safety Sample. Subjects included in the period evaluation had a baseline and at least 1 measurement within the time period that was assessed. Patients are only counted once in each time period but can appear in multiple time periods. For those with multiple records in 1 time period, only the last record in that period is included in calculations.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
De NovoMean Change From Baseline By Time Period in BMI Z-Score3-6 Months (n=73, 56, 145, 274)0.29 Standard Deviations away from PopulationStandard Deviation 0.625
De NovoMean Change From Baseline By Time Period in BMI Z-ScoreBaseline (n=84, 70, 169, 323)0.44 Standard Deviations away from PopulationStandard Deviation 1.591
De NovoMean Change From Baseline By Time Period in BMI Z-Score6-9 Months (n=62, 49, 129, 240)0.36 Standard Deviations away from PopulationStandard Deviation 0.647
De NovoMean Change From Baseline By Time Period in BMI Z-Score<=3 Months (n=84, 70, 169, 323)0.17 Standard Deviations away from PopulationStandard Deviation 0.436
De NovoMean Change From Baseline By Time Period in BMI Z-Score>9 Months (n=59, 44, 115, 218)0.33 Standard Deviations away from PopulationStandard Deviation 0.768
Rollover PlaceboMean Change From Baseline By Time Period in BMI Z-Score3-6 Months (n=73, 56, 145, 274)0.28 Standard Deviations away from PopulationStandard Deviation 0.388
Rollover PlaceboMean Change From Baseline By Time Period in BMI Z-Score<=3 Months (n=84, 70, 169, 323)0.12 Standard Deviations away from PopulationStandard Deviation 0.268
Rollover PlaceboMean Change From Baseline By Time Period in BMI Z-Score6-9 Months (n=62, 49, 129, 240)0.24 Standard Deviations away from PopulationStandard Deviation 0.438
Rollover PlaceboMean Change From Baseline By Time Period in BMI Z-ScoreBaseline (n=84, 70, 169, 323)0.98 Standard Deviations away from PopulationStandard Deviation 0.997
Rollover PlaceboMean Change From Baseline By Time Period in BMI Z-Score>9 Months (n=59, 44, 115, 218)0.15 Standard Deviations away from PopulationStandard Deviation 0.476
Rollover AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline By Time Period in BMI Z-Score6-9 Months (n=62, 49, 129, 240)0.18 Standard Deviations away from PopulationStandard Deviation 0.643
Rollover AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline By Time Period in BMI Z-ScoreBaseline (n=84, 70, 169, 323)1.01 Standard Deviations away from PopulationStandard Deviation 1.236
Rollover AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline By Time Period in BMI Z-Score<=3 Months (n=84, 70, 169, 323)0.09 Standard Deviations away from PopulationStandard Deviation 0.5
Rollover AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline By Time Period in BMI Z-Score3-6 Months (n=73, 56, 145, 274)0.18 Standard Deviations away from PopulationStandard Deviation 0.549
Rollover AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline By Time Period in BMI Z-Score>9 Months (n=59, 44, 115, 218)0.14 Standard Deviations away from PopulationStandard Deviation 0.775
TotalMean Change From Baseline By Time Period in BMI Z-Score6-9 Months (n=62, 49, 129, 240)0.24 Standard Deviations away from PopulationStandard Deviation 0.611
TotalMean Change From Baseline By Time Period in BMI Z-Score<=3 Months (n=84, 70, 169, 323)0.12 Standard Deviations away from PopulationStandard Deviation 0.443
TotalMean Change From Baseline By Time Period in BMI Z-ScoreBaseline (n=84, 70, 169, 323)0.86 Standard Deviations away from PopulationStandard Deviation 1.313
TotalMean Change From Baseline By Time Period in BMI Z-Score>9 Months (n=59, 44, 115, 218)0.19 Standard Deviations away from PopulationStandard Deviation 0.725
TotalMean Change From Baseline By Time Period in BMI Z-Score3-6 Months (n=73, 56, 145, 274)0.23 Standard Deviations away from PopulationStandard Deviation 0.543
Primary

Mean Change From Baseline by Time Period in Body Weight Z-Score

The Z-Score indicates how many standard deviations a person is from the population norm values. The body weight z-scores are designed to take into account the amount of weight gain that would be expected due to normal growth in children and adolescents. The body weight z-scores are by age and gender standardized values (corresponding to a normal distribution with mean 0 and a standard deviation of 1) of the actual weight measurements, based on the Growth Charts provided by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC; see Links section of this record).

Time frame: At screening (up to 42 days prior to treatment start), Week 0 (Baseline), Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 14, Week 20, Week 26, Week 34, Week 42, Week 52 (Endpoint)

Population: Safety Sample. Subjects included in the period evaluation had a baseline and at least 1 measurement within the time period that was assessed. Patients are only counted once in each time period but can appear in multiple time periods. For those with multiple records in 1 time period, only the last record in that period is included in calculations.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
De NovoMean Change From Baseline by Time Period in Body Weight Z-Score6-9 Months (n=63, 49, 131, 243)0.31 Standard Deviations away from PopulationStandard Deviation 0.57
De NovoMean Change From Baseline by Time Period in Body Weight Z-Score<= 3 Months (n=84, 70, 169, 323)0.13 Standard Deviations away from PopulationStandard Deviation 0.283
De NovoMean Change From Baseline by Time Period in Body Weight Z-Score>9 Months (n=59, 44, 115, 218)0.33 Standard Deviations away from PopulationStandard Deviation 0.58
De NovoMean Change From Baseline by Time Period in Body Weight Z-Score3-6 Months (n=73, 56, 145, 274)0.24 Standard Deviations away from PopulationStandard Deviation 0.433
De NovoMean Change From Baseline by Time Period in Body Weight Z-ScoreBaseline (n=84, 70, 169, 323)0.47 Standard Deviations away from PopulationStandard Deviation 1.687
Rollover PlaceboMean Change From Baseline by Time Period in Body Weight Z-Score3-6 Months (n=73, 56, 145, 274)0.26 Standard Deviations away from PopulationStandard Deviation 0.331
Rollover PlaceboMean Change From Baseline by Time Period in Body Weight Z-Score6-9 Months (n=63, 49, 131, 243)0.28 Standard Deviations away from PopulationStandard Deviation 0.367
Rollover PlaceboMean Change From Baseline by Time Period in Body Weight Z-Score>9 Months (n=59, 44, 115, 218)0.23 Standard Deviations away from PopulationStandard Deviation 0.399
Rollover PlaceboMean Change From Baseline by Time Period in Body Weight Z-Score<= 3 Months (n=84, 70, 169, 323)0.10 Standard Deviations away from PopulationStandard Deviation 0.204
Rollover PlaceboMean Change From Baseline by Time Period in Body Weight Z-ScoreBaseline (n=84, 70, 169, 323)0.95 Standard Deviations away from PopulationStandard Deviation 1.112
Rollover AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline by Time Period in Body Weight Z-Score3-6 Months (n=73, 56, 145, 274)0.20 Standard Deviations away from PopulationStandard Deviation 0.327
Rollover AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline by Time Period in Body Weight Z-ScoreBaseline (n=84, 70, 169, 323)0.98 Standard Deviations away from PopulationStandard Deviation 1.392
Rollover AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline by Time Period in Body Weight Z-Score<= 3 Months (n=84, 70, 169, 323)0.09 Standard Deviations away from PopulationStandard Deviation 0.3
Rollover AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline by Time Period in Body Weight Z-Score6-9 Months (n=63, 49, 131, 243)0.23 Standard Deviations away from PopulationStandard Deviation 0.407
Rollover AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline by Time Period in Body Weight Z-Score>9 Months (n=59, 44, 115, 218)0.24 Standard Deviations away from PopulationStandard Deviation 0.465
TotalMean Change From Baseline by Time Period in Body Weight Z-Score6-9 Months (n=63, 49, 131, 243)0.26 Standard Deviations away from PopulationStandard Deviation 0.448
TotalMean Change From Baseline by Time Period in Body Weight Z-Score<= 3 Months (n=84, 70, 169, 323)0.10 Standard Deviations away from PopulationStandard Deviation 0.277
TotalMean Change From Baseline by Time Period in Body Weight Z-ScoreBaseline (n=84, 70, 169, 323)0.84 Standard Deviations away from PopulationStandard Deviation 1.434
TotalMean Change From Baseline by Time Period in Body Weight Z-Score3-6 Months (n=73, 56, 145, 274)0.22 Standard Deviations away from PopulationStandard Deviation 0.359
TotalMean Change From Baseline by Time Period in Body Weight Z-Score>9 Months (n=59, 44, 115, 218)0.26 Standard Deviations away from PopulationStandard Deviation 0.486
Primary

Mean Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52

The AIMS is an assessment of movement dysfunctions. It is a 12-item instrument assessing abnormal involuntary movements associated with antipsychotic drugs and 'spontaneous' motor disturbance related to the illness itself. Scoring the AIMS consists of rating the severity of movement in 3 main anatomic areas (facial/oral, extremities, and trunk), based on a five-point scale (0=none, 4=severe). The AIMS Total Score has a possible range from 0 to 28. Negative change scores indicate improvement in movement dysfunction.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52

Population: Safety Sample - Observed Cases (OC) Data Set and Endpoint - Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
De NovoMean Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52Change at Week 52 (n=48, 36, 93, 177)-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.44
De NovoMean Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52Baseline (n=79, 67, 155, 301)0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
De NovoMean Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52Change at Endpoint (LOCF) (n=79, 67, 155, 301)-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.33
De NovoMean Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52Change at Week 8 (n=78, 64, 149, 291)-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.45
De NovoMean Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52Change at Week 26 (n=61, 49, 130, 240)-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.37
Rollover PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52Baseline (n=79, 67, 155, 301)0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.02
Rollover PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52Change at Week 26 (n=61, 49, 130, 240)-0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Rollover PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52Change at Week 8 (n=78, 64, 149, 291)-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.87
Rollover PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52Change at Endpoint (LOCF) (n=79, 67, 155, 301)0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.44
Rollover PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52Change at Week 52 (n=48, 36, 93, 177)-0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Rollover AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52Change at Endpoint (LOCF) (n=79, 67, 155, 301)-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.32
Rollover AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52Change at Week 52 (n=48, 36, 93, 177)-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.13
Rollover AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52Change at Week 26 (n=61, 49, 130, 240)-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.26
Rollover AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52Baseline (n=79, 67, 155, 301)0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.23
Rollover AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52Change at Week 8 (n=78, 64, 149, 291)-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.15
TotalMean Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52Change at Endpoint (LOCF) (n=79, 67, 155, 301)-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.35
TotalMean Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52Baseline (n=79, 67, 155, 301)0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
TotalMean Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52Change at Week 8 (n=78, 64, 149, 291)-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.18
TotalMean Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52Change at Week 52 (n=48, 36, 93, 177)-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
TotalMean Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52Change at Week 26 (n=61, 49, 130, 240)-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Primary

Mean Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Global Clinical Assessment at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52, and Endpoint

The Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale is a 4-item scale to assess presence and severity of drug-induced akathisia, including both objective items and subjective items, together with a global clinical assessment of akathisia. Global assessment is made on a scale of 0 to 5 with comprehensive definitions provided for each anchor point on scale: 0=absent; 1=questionable; 2=mild akathisia; 3=moderate akathisia; 4=marked akathisia; 5=severe akathisia. Score has a possible range from 0 (absent) to 5 (severe akathisia). Negative change scores indicate improvement in akathisia.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52

Population: Safety Sample - Observed Cases (OC) Data Set and Endpoint - Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
De NovoMean Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Global Clinical Assessment at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52, and EndpointChange at Week 8 (n=78, 60, 149, 287)-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.55
De NovoMean Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Global Clinical Assessment at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52, and EndpointBaseline (n=79, 64, 154, 297)0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.57
De NovoMean Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Global Clinical Assessment at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52, and EndpointChange at Week 26 (n=61, 47, 129, 237)-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.64
De NovoMean Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Global Clinical Assessment at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52, and EndpointChange at Endpoint (LOCF) (n=79, 64, 154, 297)0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.67
De NovoMean Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Global Clinical Assessment at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52, and EndpointChange at Week 52 (n=48, 35, 93, 176)-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.37
Rollover PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Global Clinical Assessment at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52, and EndpointBaseline (n=79, 64, 154, 297)0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.54
Rollover PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Global Clinical Assessment at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52, and EndpointChange at Endpoint (LOCF) (n=79, 64, 154, 297)0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.52
Rollover PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Global Clinical Assessment at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52, and EndpointChange at Week 8 (n=78, 60, 149, 287)-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Rollover PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Global Clinical Assessment at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52, and EndpointChange at Week 26 (n=61, 47, 129, 237)-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.48
Rollover PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Global Clinical Assessment at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52, and EndpointChange at Week 52 (n=48, 35, 93, 176)0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.49
Rollover AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Global Clinical Assessment at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52, and EndpointChange at Week 8 (n=78, 60, 149, 287)0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.35
Rollover AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Global Clinical Assessment at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52, and EndpointChange at Week 26 (n=61, 47, 129, 237)0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.41
Rollover AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Global Clinical Assessment at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52, and EndpointChange at Week 52 (n=48, 35, 93, 176)0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.56
Rollover AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Global Clinical Assessment at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52, and EndpointBaseline (n=79, 64, 154, 297)0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.41
Rollover AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Global Clinical Assessment at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52, and EndpointChange at Endpoint (LOCF) (n=79, 64, 154, 297)0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
TotalMean Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Global Clinical Assessment at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52, and EndpointChange at Week 8 (n=78, 60, 149, 287)0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.44
TotalMean Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Global Clinical Assessment at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52, and EndpointChange at Week 52 (n=48, 35, 93, 176)0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
TotalMean Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Global Clinical Assessment at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52, and EndpointChange at Week 26 (n=61, 47, 129, 237)0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
TotalMean Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Global Clinical Assessment at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52, and EndpointBaseline (n=79, 64, 154, 297)0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.49
TotalMean Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Global Clinical Assessment at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52, and EndpointChange at Endpoint (LOCF) (n=79, 64, 154, 297)0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.59
Primary

Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Body Mass Index (BMI)

The body mass index (BMI) is a statistical measurement which compares a person's weight and height. Though it does not actually measure the percentage of body fat, it is used to estimate a healthy body weight based on subject height.

Time frame: At screening (up to 42 days prior to treatment start), Week 0 (Baseline), Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 14, Week 20, Week 26, Week 34, Week 42, Week 52 (Endpoint)

Population: Safety Sample: Endpoint - Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
De NovoMean Change From Baseline in Patient Body Mass Index (BMI)Baseline (n=84, 69, 169, 322)20.1 kg/m2Standard Deviation 6.31
De NovoMean Change From Baseline in Patient Body Mass Index (BMI)Change at Endpoint (LOCF) (n=84, 69, 169, 322)1.7 kg/m2Standard Deviation 2.56
Rollover PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Patient Body Mass Index (BMI)Change at Endpoint (LOCF) (n=84, 69, 169, 322)1.4 kg/m2Standard Deviation 2.07
Rollover PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Patient Body Mass Index (BMI)Baseline (n=84, 69, 169, 322)21.0 kg/m2Standard Deviation 5.15
Rollover AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline in Patient Body Mass Index (BMI)Baseline (n=84, 69, 169, 322)21.6 kg/m2Standard Deviation 6.38
Rollover AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline in Patient Body Mass Index (BMI)Change at Endpoint (LOCF) (n=84, 69, 169, 322)1.8 kg/m2Standard Deviation 2.51
TotalMean Change From Baseline in Patient Body Mass Index (BMI)Baseline (n=84, 69, 169, 322)21.1 kg/m2Standard Deviation 6.13
TotalMean Change From Baseline in Patient Body Mass Index (BMI)Change at Endpoint (LOCF) (n=84, 69, 169, 322)1.7 kg/m2Standard Deviation 2.43
Primary

Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight

Time frame: At screening (up to 42 days prior to treatment start), Week 0 (Baseline), Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 14, Week 20, Week 26, Week 34, Week 42, Week 52 (Endpoint)

Population: Safety Sample - Observed Cases (OC) Data Set and Endpoint - Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
De NovoMean Change From Baseline in Patient WeightChange at Week 42 (n=58, 43, 115, 216)7.0 kgStandard Deviation 6.46
De NovoMean Change From Baseline in Patient WeightChange at Endpoint (LOCF) (n=84, 69, 169, 322)6.3 kgStandard Deviation 6.71
De NovoMean Change From Baseline in Patient WeightChange at Week 26 (n=61, 49, 130, 240)5.0 kgStandard Deviation 4.41
De NovoMean Change From Baseline in Patient WeightBaseline (n=84, 69, 169, 322)42.5 kgStandard Deviation 23.17
De NovoMean Change From Baseline in Patient WeightChange at Week 34 (n=60, 46, 123, 229)6.0 kgStandard Deviation 5.8
De NovoMean Change From Baseline in Patient WeightChange at Week 2 (n=81, 67, 165, 313)0.2 kgStandard Deviation 0.99
De NovoMean Change From Baseline in Patient WeightChange at Week 4 (n=80, 67, 165, 312)0.8 kgStandard Deviation 1.26
De NovoMean Change From Baseline in Patient WeightChange at Week 1 (n=78, 58, 149, 285)0.2 kgStandard Deviation 0.76
De NovoMean Change From Baseline in Patient WeightChange at Week 52 (n=48, 36, 94, 178)8.7 kgStandard Deviation 6.77
De NovoMean Change From Baseline in Patient WeightChange at Week 8 (n=77, 65, 149, 291)1.6 kgStandard Deviation 1.99
De NovoMean Change From Baseline in Patient WeightChange at Week 14 (n=71, 55, 142, 268)3.3 kgStandard Deviation 2.81
De NovoMean Change From Baseline in Patient WeightChange at Week 20 (n=66, 50, 136, 252)4.0 kgStandard Deviation 3.39
Rollover PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Patient WeightChange at Week 1 (n=78, 58, 149, 285)-0.1 kgStandard Deviation 1.06
Rollover PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Patient WeightChange at Week 20 (n=66, 50, 136, 252)3.3 kgStandard Deviation 4.73
Rollover PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Patient WeightChange at Week 4 (n=80, 67, 165, 312)0.5 kgStandard Deviation 1.6
Rollover PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Patient WeightChange at Week 34 (n=60, 46, 123, 229)5.8 kgStandard Deviation 4.9
Rollover PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Patient WeightChange at Week 42 (n=58, 43, 115, 216)6.4 kgStandard Deviation 5.9
Rollover PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Patient WeightChange at Week 26 (n=61, 49, 130, 240)4.7 kgStandard Deviation 4.36
Rollover PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Patient WeightBaseline (n=84, 69, 169, 322)45.1 kgStandard Deviation 20.37
Rollover PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Patient WeightChange at Week 14 (n=71, 55, 142, 268)2.8 kgStandard Deviation 2.79
Rollover PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Patient WeightChange at Week 8 (n=77, 65, 149, 291)1.5 kgStandard Deviation 2.29
Rollover PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Patient WeightChange at Week 2 (n=81, 67, 165, 313)0.0 kgStandard Deviation 1.47
Rollover PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Patient WeightChange at Endpoint (LOCF) (n=84, 69, 169, 322)5.5 kgStandard Deviation 5.5
Rollover PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Patient WeightChange at Week 52 (n=48, 36, 94, 178)7.7 kgStandard Deviation 6.44
Rollover AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline in Patient WeightChange at Week 26 (n=61, 49, 130, 240)4.9 kgStandard Deviation 3.99
Rollover AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline in Patient WeightBaseline (n=84, 69, 169, 322)45.4 kgStandard Deviation 21.79
Rollover AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline in Patient WeightChange at Week 1 (n=78, 58, 149, 285)0.4 kgStandard Deviation 0.94
Rollover AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline in Patient WeightChange at Week 2 (n=81, 67, 165, 313)0.8 kgStandard Deviation 1.15
Rollover AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline in Patient WeightChange at Week 4 (n=80, 67, 165, 312)1.2 kgStandard Deviation 1.43
Rollover AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline in Patient WeightChange at Week 8 (n=77, 65, 149, 291)1.9 kgStandard Deviation 2.09
Rollover AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline in Patient WeightChange at Week 14 (n=71, 55, 142, 268)3.1 kgStandard Deviation 2.8
Rollover AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline in Patient WeightChange at Week 20 (n=66, 50, 136, 252)4.2 kgStandard Deviation 3.34
Rollover AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline in Patient WeightChange at Week 34 (n=60, 46, 123, 229)6.1 kgStandard Deviation 4.68
Rollover AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline in Patient WeightChange at Week 42 (n=58, 43, 115, 216)7.1 kgStandard Deviation 5.11
Rollover AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline in Patient WeightChange at Week 52 (n=48, 36, 94, 178)7.9 kgStandard Deviation 5.9
Rollover AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline in Patient WeightChange at Endpoint (LOCF) (n=84, 69, 169, 322)6.6 kgStandard Deviation 5.72
TotalMean Change From Baseline in Patient WeightChange at Week 14 (n=71, 55, 142, 268)3.1 kgStandard Deviation 2.8
TotalMean Change From Baseline in Patient WeightChange at Week 8 (n=77, 65, 149, 291)1.8 kgStandard Deviation 2.11
TotalMean Change From Baseline in Patient WeightBaseline (n=84, 69, 169, 322)44.6 kgStandard Deviation 21.83
TotalMean Change From Baseline in Patient WeightChange at Week 42 (n=58, 43, 115, 216)6.9 kgStandard Deviation 5.64
TotalMean Change From Baseline in Patient WeightChange at Week 4 (n=80, 67, 165, 312)1.0 kgStandard Deviation 1.45
TotalMean Change From Baseline in Patient WeightChange at Week 2 (n=81, 67, 165, 313)0.5 kgStandard Deviation 1.23
TotalMean Change From Baseline in Patient WeightChange at Endpoint (LOCF) (n=84, 69, 169, 322)6.3 kgStandard Deviation 5.94
TotalMean Change From Baseline in Patient WeightChange at Week 52 (n=48, 36, 94, 178)8.1 kgStandard Deviation 6.23
TotalMean Change From Baseline in Patient WeightChange at Week 26 (n=61, 49, 130, 240)4.9 kgStandard Deviation 4.16
TotalMean Change From Baseline in Patient WeightChange at Week 20 (n=66, 50, 136, 252)4.0 kgStandard Deviation 3.67
TotalMean Change From Baseline in Patient WeightChange at Week 1 (n=78, 58, 149, 285)0.3 kgStandard Deviation 0.94
TotalMean Change From Baseline in Patient WeightChange at Week 34 (n=60, 46, 123, 229)6.0 kgStandard Deviation 5.02
Primary

Mean Change From Baseline in Total Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52

The SAS is a 10-item instrument used to evaluate the presence and severity of parkinsonian symptomatology. It is the most commonly used rating scale for Parkinsonism in clinical trials over the past 25 years. The ten items focus on rigidity rather than bradykinesia, and do not assess subjective rigidity or slowness. Items are rated for severity on a 0-4 scale, with definitions given for each anchor point. The total SAS Score has a possible range from 10 to 50. Negative change scores indicate improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52

Population: Safety Sample - Observed Cases (OC) Data Set and Endpoint - Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
De NovoMean Change From Baseline in Total Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52Change at Week 26 (n=61, 47, 126, 234)-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.59
De NovoMean Change From Baseline in Total Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52Change at Endpoint (LOCF) (n=79, 63, 153, 295)-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
De NovoMean Change From Baseline in Total Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52Change at Week 8 (n=77, 60, 145, 282)-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.13
De NovoMean Change From Baseline in Total Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52Change at Week 52 (n=48, 36, 91, 175)-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.44
De NovoMean Change From Baseline in Total Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52Baseline (n=79, 63, 153, 295)10.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Rollover PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Total Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52Change at Week 52 (n=48, 36, 91, 175)0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Rollover PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Total Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52Change at Endpoint (LOCF) (n=79, 63, 153, 295)0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.59
Rollover PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Total Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52Baseline (n=79, 63, 153, 295)10.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.17
Rollover PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Total Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52Change at Week 8 (n=77, 60, 145, 282)0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.51
Rollover PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Total Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52Change at Week 26 (n=61, 47, 126, 234)0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.42
Rollover AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline in Total Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52Baseline (n=79, 63, 153, 295)11.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.11
Rollover AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline in Total Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52Change at Endpoint (LOCF) (n=79, 63, 153, 295)-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.06
Rollover AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline in Total Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52Change at Week 26 (n=61, 47, 126, 234)-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.96
Rollover AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline in Total Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52Change at Week 52 (n=48, 36, 91, 175)-0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.82
Rollover AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline in Total Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52Change at Week 8 (n=77, 60, 145, 282)-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.12
TotalMean Change From Baseline in Total Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52Change at Endpoint (LOCF) (n=79, 63, 153, 295)-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.89
TotalMean Change From Baseline in Total Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52Baseline (n=79, 63, 153, 295)10.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.77
TotalMean Change From Baseline in Total Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52Change at Week 8 (n=77, 60, 145, 282)-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.78
TotalMean Change From Baseline in Total Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52Change at Week 26 (n=61, 47, 126, 234)-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.79
TotalMean Change From Baseline in Total Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52Change at Week 52 (n=48, 36, 91, 175)-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.75
Primary

Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities

These abbreviations are used in the table of ECG measurements: supraventricular (SV), baseline (BL), 1 degree (1°), atrioventricular (A-V), intraventricular (IVT), symmetrical (SYM), corrected QT interval (QTc). QRS complex is a recording of a single heartbeat on ECG corresponding to the depolarization of the right and left ventricles. PR interval is measured from beginning of P wave to beginning of QRS complex. QT interval is a measure of time between start of Q wave and end of T wave in the heart's electrical cycle. ↑ = increase from baseline, ↓ = decrease from baseline, → = to

Time frame: At screening (up to 42 days prior to treatment start), Week 8, Week 26, Week 52

Population: Safety Sample

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesRight Bundle Branch Block (not present → present)0 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesLeft Bundle Branch Block (not present → present)0 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities2° A-V block (not present → present)0 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesVentricular Tachycardia (not present → present)0 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities1° A-V Block (PR ≥ 0.20 sec and ↑ ≥ 0.05 sec)0 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesAtrial Flutter (not present → present)0 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesAtrial Fibrillation (not present → present)0 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesQTcB interval (>475 msec & elevation 10% over BL)1 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesSYM T-Wave Inversion (not present → present)0 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesSinus Bradycardia (≤50 bpm and ↓ ≥15 bpm)0 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesOther Abnormality3 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities3° A-V block (not present → present)0 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesMyocardial Ischemia (not present → present)0 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesAcute/Subacute Infarction (not present → present)0 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesSV Premature Beat (≥2per10sec & ↑ over BL)0 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesQTcF interval (>475 msec & elevation 10% over BL)1 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesOld Infarction (not present-present at ≥12 weeks)0 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesOther ITV Block (QRS ≥ 0.10 sec & ↑ 0.02 sec)0 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesVentricular Premature Beat(≥1per10sec & ↑ over BL)0 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesSinus Tachycardia (≥140 bpm & ↑ ≥15 bpm)2 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesPre-Excitation Syndrome (not present → present)0 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesSV Tachycardia (not present → present)0 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesSV Tachycardia (not present → present)0 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesSinus Tachycardia (≥140 bpm & ↑ ≥15 bpm)0 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesSinus Bradycardia (≤50 bpm and ↓ ≥15 bpm)0 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesVentricular Tachycardia (not present → present)0 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesSV Premature Beat (≥2per10sec & ↑ over BL)0 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesVentricular Premature Beat(≥1per10sec & ↑ over BL)0 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesAtrial Fibrillation (not present → present)0 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesAtrial Flutter (not present → present)0 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities1° A-V Block (PR ≥ 0.20 sec and ↑ ≥ 0.05 sec)0 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities2° A-V block (not present → present)0 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities3° A-V block (not present → present)0 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesLeft Bundle Branch Block (not present → present)0 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesRight Bundle Branch Block (not present → present)0 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesPre-Excitation Syndrome (not present → present)0 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesOther ITV Block (QRS ≥ 0.10 sec & ↑ 0.02 sec)0 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesOld Infarction (not present-present at ≥12 weeks)0 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesAcute/Subacute Infarction (not present → present)0 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesMyocardial Ischemia (not present → present)0 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesSYM T-Wave Inversion (not present → present)0 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesQTcB interval (>475 msec & elevation 10% over BL)0 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesQTcF interval (>475 msec & elevation 10% over BL)0 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesOther Abnormality3 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities3° A-V block (not present → present)0 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesSV Tachycardia (not present → present)0 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesSYM T-Wave Inversion (not present → present)0 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesLeft Bundle Branch Block (not present → present)0 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesSinus Tachycardia (≥140 bpm & ↑ ≥15 bpm)2 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesRight Bundle Branch Block (not present → present)0 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesVentricular Premature Beat(≥1per10sec & ↑ over BL)0 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesPre-Excitation Syndrome (not present → present)0 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesQTcB interval (>475 msec & elevation 10% over BL)2 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesOther ITV Block (QRS ≥ 0.10 sec & ↑ 0.02 sec)3 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesSV Premature Beat (≥2per10sec & ↑ over BL)0 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesOld Infarction (not present-present at ≥12 weeks)0 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesAcute/Subacute Infarction (not present → present)0 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesSinus Bradycardia (≤50 bpm and ↓ ≥15 bpm)0 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesAtrial Fibrillation (not present → present)0 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesVentricular Tachycardia (not present → present)0 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesMyocardial Ischemia (not present → present)0 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesAtrial Flutter (not present → present)0 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesOther Abnormality6 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities1° A-V Block (PR ≥ 0.20 sec and ↑ ≥ 0.05 sec)1 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities2° A-V block (not present → present)0 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesQTcF interval (>475 msec & elevation 10% over BL)0 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesSinus Bradycardia (≤50 bpm and ↓ ≥15 bpm)0 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities3° A-V block (not present → present)0 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesSYM T-Wave Inversion (not present → present)0 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesAtrial Flutter (not present → present)0 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesAcute/Subacute Infarction (not present → present)0 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesLeft Bundle Branch Block (not present → present)0 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesVentricular Premature Beat(≥1per10sec & ↑ over BL)0 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesSinus Tachycardia (≥140 bpm & ↑ ≥15 bpm)4 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesMyocardial Ischemia (not present → present)0 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesRight Bundle Branch Block (not present → present)0 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesVentricular Tachycardia (not present → present)0 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesQTcF interval (>475 msec & elevation 10% over BL)1 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesOther Abnormality12 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesPre-Excitation Syndrome (not present → present)0 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesSV Premature Beat (≥2per10sec & ↑ over BL)0 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesAtrial Fibrillation (not present → present)0 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities2° A-V block (not present → present)0 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesOther ITV Block (QRS ≥ 0.10 sec & ↑ 0.02 sec)3 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities1° A-V Block (PR ≥ 0.20 sec and ↑ ≥ 0.05 sec)1 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesQTcB interval (>475 msec & elevation 10% over BL)3 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesSV Tachycardia (not present → present)0 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) AbnormalitiesOld Infarction (not present-present at ≥12 weeks)0 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities

Abnormal chemistry criterion values include the following: aspartate aminotransferase ≥3x upper limit of normal (ULN); alanine aminotransferase ≥3x ULN; alkaline phosphatase ≥3x ULN; lactate dehydrogenase ≥3x ULN; creatinine ≥2.0 mg/dL; uric acid, ≥10.5 mg/dL (male), ≥8.5 mg/dL (female); bilirubin (Total) ≥2.0 mg/dL; serum prolactin \>ULN; creatine kinase ≥3x ULN; blood urea nitrogen ≥30 mg/dL; sodium ≤126 mEq/L or ≥156 mEq/L; potassium ≤2.5 mEq/L or ≥ 6.5 mEq/L; chloride ≤90 mEq/L or ≥118 mEq/L; calcium ≤8.2 mg/dL or ≥12 mg/dL

Time frame: At screening (up to 42 days prior to treatment start), Week 8, Week 26, Week 52

Population: Safety Sample

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesBlood Urea Nitrogen0 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesPotassium, Serum0 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesAlanine Aminotransferase3 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesAspartate Aminotransferase0 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesAlkaline Phosphatase0 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesProlactin2 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesLactate Dehydrogenase0 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesCreatinine0 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesUric Acid0 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesBilirubin, Total0 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesCreatine Kinase2 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesSodium, Serum0 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesChloride, Serum0 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesCalcium, Total0 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesLactate Dehydrogenase0 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesSodium, Serum0 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesCalcium, Total0 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesBilirubin, Total0 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesAlkaline Phosphatase0 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesBlood Urea Nitrogen1 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesCreatine Kinase4 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesAspartate Aminotransferase0 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesChloride, Serum0 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesCreatinine0 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesPotassium, Serum0 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesAlanine Aminotransferase2 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesProlactin0 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesUric Acid0 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesCreatinine0 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesProlactin0 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesCalcium, Total0 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesLactate Dehydrogenase0 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesChloride, Serum0 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesUric Acid0 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesBilirubin, Total0 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesCreatine Kinase7 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesBlood Urea Nitrogen1 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesSodium, Serum0 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesAlanine Aminotransferase5 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesAspartate Aminotransferase2 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesPotassium, Serum0 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesAlkaline Phosphatase0 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesUric Acid0 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesAspartate Aminotransferase2 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesSodium, Serum0 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesCreatinine0 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesAlkaline Phosphatase0 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesAlanine Aminotransferase10 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesPotassium, Serum0 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesCalcium, Total0 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesLactate Dehydrogenase0 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesCreatine Kinase13 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesBilirubin, Total0 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesProlactin2 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesBlood Urea Nitrogen2 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry AbnormalitiesChloride, Serum0 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology Abnormalities

Abnormal hematology criterion values include the following: hematocrit (ages 6-17, males & females) ≤33%; hemoglobin (ages 6-17, males & females) \<11.3 g/dL; leukocytes ≤2800 c/mm3 or ≥16000 c/mm3; eosinophils (ages 6-17, males & females) \>17%; neutrophils \<15%; platelet count ≤75,000 c/mm3 or ≥700,000 c/mm3

Time frame: At screening (up to 42 days prior to treatment start), Week 8, Week 26, Week 52

Population: Safety Sample

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology AbnormalitiesEosinophils, relative0 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology AbnormalitiesNeutrophils, relative1 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology AbnormalitiesHemoglobin0 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology AbnormalitiesLeukocytes2 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology AbnormalitiesPlatelet Count0 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology AbnormalitiesHematocrit0 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology AbnormalitiesHemoglobin2 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology AbnormalitiesHematocrit0 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology AbnormalitiesLeukocytes0 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology AbnormalitiesEosinophils, relative1 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology AbnormalitiesNeutrophils, relative0 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology AbnormalitiesPlatelet Count1 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology AbnormalitiesHematocrit2 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology AbnormalitiesHemoglobin3 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology AbnormalitiesEosinophils, relative3 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology AbnormalitiesPlatelet Count0 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology AbnormalitiesNeutrophils, relative0 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology AbnormalitiesLeukocytes3 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology AbnormalitiesNeutrophils, relative1 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology AbnormalitiesHematocrit2 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology AbnormalitiesHemoglobin5 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology AbnormalitiesLeukocytes5 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology AbnormalitiesPlatelet Count1 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology AbnormalitiesEosinophils, relative4 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities

Abnormal metabolic criterion values include the following: fasting serum glucose ≥115 mg/dL; non-fasting serum glucose ≥ 200 mg/dL; total cholesterol ≥240 mg/dL; LDL cholesterol ≥160 mg/dL; HDL cholesterol ≤30 mg/dL; triglycerides ≥120 mg/dL (females), ≥160 mg/dL (males)

Time frame: At screening (up to 42 days prior to treatment start), Week 8, Week 26, Week 52

Population: Safety Sample

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesCholesterol, Total Non-Fasting0 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesGlucose, Fasting Serum1 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesGlucose, Serum0 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesCholesterol, HDL Fasting4 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesCholesterol, HDL Non-Fasting4 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesCholesterol, HDL Random7 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesCholesterol, LDL Fasting0 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesCholesterol, LDL Non-Fasting0 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesCholesterol, LDL Random0 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesCholesterol, Total Fasting1 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesCholesterol, Total Random1 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesTriglycerides, Fasting10 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesTriglycerides, Non-Fasting15 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesTriglycerides, Random22 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesCholesterol, HDL Random6 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesTriglycerides, Fasting8 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesCholesterol, HDL Non-Fasting3 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesCholesterol, LDL Random0 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesGlucose, Serum0 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesCholesterol, Total Random0 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesCholesterol, Total Non-Fasting0 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesCholesterol, Total Fasting0 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesCholesterol, HDL Fasting3 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesCholesterol, LDL Fasting0 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesTriglycerides, Random20 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesGlucose, Fasting Serum1 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesTriglycerides, Non-Fasting12 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesCholesterol, LDL Non-Fasting0 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesGlucose, Serum0 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesCholesterol, HDL Non-Fasting10 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesCholesterol, HDL Random16 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesTriglycerides, Random47 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesCholesterol, LDL Fasting2 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesCholesterol, LDL Non-Fasting0 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesTriglycerides, Non-Fasting33 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesCholesterol, LDL Random2 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesCholesterol, Total Fasting1 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesCholesterol, Total Non-Fasting1 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesCholesterol, Total Random2 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesGlucose, Fasting Serum5 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesTriglycerides, Fasting20 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesCholesterol, HDL Fasting7 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesCholesterol, LDL Random2 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesCholesterol, LDL Non-Fasting0 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesTriglycerides, Fasting38 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesCholesterol, LDL Fasting2 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesCholesterol, HDL Non-Fasting17 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesGlucose, Fasting Serum7 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesCholesterol, Total Random3 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesCholesterol, HDL Random29 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesCholesterol, HDL Fasting14 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesCholesterol, Total Fasting2 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesTriglycerides, Non-Fasting60 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesGlucose, Serum0 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesCholesterol, Total Non-Fasting1 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic AbnormalitiesTriglycerides, Random89 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Deaths, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, Extra Pyramidal Syndrome (EPS)-Related AEs

Participants with Adverse Events (AEs), Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), and AEs leading to study discontinuation. AE is defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition. SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a cancer, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, results in the development of drug dependency or drug abuse, is an important medical event.

Time frame: From Screening (up to 42 days prior to treatment start) through Week 52 (end of study) for SAEs; from Week 0 (Baseline) through Week 52 (End of Study) for AEs

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
De NovoNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Deaths, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, Extra Pyramidal Syndrome (EPS)-Related AEsTreatment-Emergent AEs75 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Deaths, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, Extra Pyramidal Syndrome (EPS)-Related AEsDeaths0 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Deaths, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, Extra Pyramidal Syndrome (EPS)-Related AEsTreatment-Emergent AEs Leading to Discontinuation9 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Deaths, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, Extra Pyramidal Syndrome (EPS)-Related AEsTreatment-Emergent SAEs3 Participants
De NovoNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Deaths, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, Extra Pyramidal Syndrome (EPS)-Related AEsTreatment-Emergent EPS-Related AEs16 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Deaths, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, Extra Pyramidal Syndrome (EPS)-Related AEsTreatment-Emergent AEs63 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Deaths, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, Extra Pyramidal Syndrome (EPS)-Related AEsTreatment-Emergent EPS-Related AEs6 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Deaths, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, Extra Pyramidal Syndrome (EPS)-Related AEsTreatment-Emergent AEs Leading to Discontinuation10 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Deaths, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, Extra Pyramidal Syndrome (EPS)-Related AEsTreatment-Emergent SAEs1 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Deaths, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, Extra Pyramidal Syndrome (EPS)-Related AEsDeaths0 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Deaths, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, Extra Pyramidal Syndrome (EPS)-Related AEsTreatment-Emergent EPS-Related AEs26 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Deaths, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, Extra Pyramidal Syndrome (EPS)-Related AEsDeaths0 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Deaths, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, Extra Pyramidal Syndrome (EPS)-Related AEsTreatment-Emergent SAEs5 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Deaths, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, Extra Pyramidal Syndrome (EPS)-Related AEsTreatment-Emergent AEs148 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Deaths, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, Extra Pyramidal Syndrome (EPS)-Related AEsTreatment-Emergent AEs Leading to Discontinuation14 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Deaths, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, Extra Pyramidal Syndrome (EPS)-Related AEsDeaths0 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Deaths, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, Extra Pyramidal Syndrome (EPS)-Related AEsTreatment-Emergent AEs Leading to Discontinuation33 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Deaths, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, Extra Pyramidal Syndrome (EPS)-Related AEsTreatment-Emergent SAEs9 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Deaths, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, Extra Pyramidal Syndrome (EPS)-Related AEsTreatment-Emergent EPS-Related AEs48 Participants
TotalNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Deaths, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, Extra Pyramidal Syndrome (EPS)-Related AEsTreatment-Emergent AEs286 Participants
Primary

Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities

Clinically significantly abnormal vital signs met age-appropriate (heart rate cohorts: ages 5-14 & ages 15+; blood pressure cohorts: ages 6-12 & ages 13-17) criterion AND represented change from pretreatment value of at least the following magnitudes: systolic blood pressure (≥130 mmHg & ≥144 mmHg w/ increase of ≥20 mmHg) or (≤117 mmHg & ≤120 mmHg w/ decrease of ≥20 mmHg); diastolic blood pressure (≥86 mmHg & ≥92 mmHg w/ increase of ≥15 mmHg) or (≤75 mm Hg & ≤80 mmHg w/ decrease of ≥15 mmHg); heart rate (140 bpm and 120 bpm w/ increase of ≥15 bpm) or (50 bpm and 50 bpm w/ decrease of ≥15 bpm).

Time frame: At screening (up to 42 days prior to treatment start), Week 0 (Baseline), Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 14, Week 20, Week 26, Week 34, Week 42, Week 52 (Endpoint)

Population: Safety Sample

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
De NovoNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSitting Heart Rate Decrease0 Participants
De NovoNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSupine Heart Rate Decrease0 Participants
De NovoNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSitting Diastolic Blood Pressure Decrease14 Participants
De NovoNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSitting Heart Rate Increase1 Participants
De NovoNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSitting Systolic Blood Pressure Decrease11 Participants
De NovoNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSupine Heart Rate Increase1 Participants
De NovoNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSitting Systolic Blood Pressure Increase3 Participants
De NovoNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesStanding Systolic Blood Pressure Increase6 Participants
De NovoNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSupine Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase6 Participants
De NovoNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesStanding Diastolic Blood Pressure Decrease22 Participants
De NovoNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSitting Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase2 Participants
De NovoNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesStanding Heart Rate Decrease0 Participants
De NovoNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSupine Diastolic Blood Pressure Decrease15 Participants
De NovoNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesStanding Systolic Blood Pressure Decrease16 Participants
De NovoNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSupine Systolic Blood Pressure Decrease14 Participants
De NovoNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesStanding Heart Rate Increase5 Participants
De NovoNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesStanding Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase3 Participants
De NovoNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSupine Systolic Blood Pressure Increase5 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesStanding Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase8 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesStanding Diastolic Blood Pressure Decrease20 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSupine Heart Rate Decrease0 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSitting Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase2 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSitting Diastolic Blood Pressure Decrease8 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesStanding Systolic Blood Pressure Increase7 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSupine Heart Rate Increase1 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesStanding Systolic Blood Pressure Decrease22 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSitting Heart Rate Increase0 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSitting Systolic Blood Pressure Increase1 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSupine Systolic Blood Pressure Increase2 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSitting Systolic Blood Pressure Decrease8 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesStanding Heart Rate Decrease0 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSupine Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase5 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSitting Heart Rate Decrease0 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSupine Diastolic Blood Pressure Decrease19 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesStanding Heart Rate Increase3 Participants
Rollover PlaceboNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSupine Systolic Blood Pressure Decrease15 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesStanding Heart Rate Decrease1 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSupine Systolic Blood Pressure Increase18 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSupine Systolic Blood Pressure Decrease27 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesStanding Systolic Blood Pressure Increase13 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesStanding Systolic Blood Pressure Decrease25 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSitting Systolic Blood Pressure Increase6 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSitting Systolic Blood Pressure Decrease13 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSupine Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase11 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSupine Diastolic Blood Pressure Decrease38 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesStanding Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase17 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesStanding Diastolic Blood Pressure Decrease36 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSitting Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase1 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSitting Diastolic Blood Pressure Decrease9 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSupine Heart Rate Increase2 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSupine Heart Rate Decrease0 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesStanding Heart Rate Increase4 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSitting Heart Rate Increase1 Participants
Rollover AripiprazoleNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSitting Heart Rate Decrease0 Participants
TotalNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSupine Systolic Blood Pressure Decrease56 Participants
TotalNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSupine Heart Rate Decrease0 Participants
TotalNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesStanding Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase28 Participants
TotalNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSupine Diastolic Blood Pressure Decrease72 Participants
TotalNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSupine Systolic Blood Pressure Increase25 Participants
TotalNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesStanding Heart Rate Increase12 Participants
TotalNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSupine Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase22 Participants
TotalNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSitting Systolic Blood Pressure Decrease32 Participants
TotalNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesStanding Systolic Blood Pressure Increase26 Participants
TotalNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesStanding Heart Rate Decrease1 Participants
TotalNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSitting Systolic Blood Pressure Increase10 Participants
TotalNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesStanding Systolic Blood Pressure Decrease63 Participants
TotalNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSitting Heart Rate Decrease0 Participants
TotalNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSitting Diastolic Blood Pressure Decrease31 Participants
TotalNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSitting Heart Rate Increase2 Participants
TotalNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSupine Heart Rate Increase4 Participants
TotalNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSitting Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase5 Participants
TotalNumber of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesStanding Diastolic Blood Pressure Decrease78 Participants
Secondary

CGI-Improvement Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)

CGI scale is a global evaluation of improvement over time. CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) is a clinician rated assessment that evaluates improvement relative to symptoms at baseline on a a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). CGI-I Score is from 1 to 7. A lower score signifies larger improvement.

Time frame: Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)

Population: Efficacy Sample. The Efficacy Sample includes all patients that had a baseline and at least one post-baseline measurement of the same scale. A total of 322 patients met this criterion based on CGI-S evaluations.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
De NovoCGI-Improvement Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)2.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Rollover PlaceboCGI-Improvement Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)2.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.24
Rollover AripiprazoleCGI-Improvement Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)2.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
TotalCGI-Improvement Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)2.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.23
Secondary

Change From Baseline in ABC Stereotypy Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)

The ABC is an informant-based symptom checklist for assessing and classifying problem behaviors of children and adolescents with mental retardation. The 58 items are rated on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all a problem to 3 = the problem is severe in degree), and resolve into 5 subscales: (1) irritability and agitation; (2) lethargy and social withdrawal; (3) stereotypic behavior; (4) hyperactivity and noncompliance, and (5) inappropriate speech. ABC Stereotypy Subscale Score is from 0 to 21. A negative change score signifies improvement.

Time frame: Week 0 (Baseline), Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)

Population: Efficacy Sample, LOCF. The Efficacy Sample includes all patients that had a baseline and at least one post-baseline measurement of the same scale. A total of 322 patients met this criterion based on CGI-S evaluations. Of those, 8 patients had baseline ABC (all subscales) evaluations but no post-baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
De NovoChange From Baseline in ABC Stereotypy Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Baseline8.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.18
De NovoChange From Baseline in ABC Stereotypy Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Change at Endpoint (LOCF)-2.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.67
Rollover PlaceboChange From Baseline in ABC Stereotypy Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Change at Endpoint (LOCF)-1.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.46
Rollover PlaceboChange From Baseline in ABC Stereotypy Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Baseline8.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.57
Rollover AripiprazoleChange From Baseline in ABC Stereotypy Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Baseline6.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.46
Rollover AripiprazoleChange From Baseline in ABC Stereotypy Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Change at Endpoint (LOCF)0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.58
TotalChange From Baseline in ABC Stereotypy Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Baseline7.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.46
TotalChange From Baseline in ABC Stereotypy Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Change at Endpoint (LOCF)-1.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.71
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS) Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)

CY-BOCS is a 10-item, clinician-rated scale designed to measure the severity of obsessive-compulsive symptoms in patients below the age of 18. The scale contains 5 items pertaining to obsessions (which were not used in this trial) and 5 items pertaining to compulsions, which rated each symptom domain in terms of time spent, interference with functioning, distress, resistance, and control. Each item was rated on a 5-point scale, from 0 (no symptoms or minimum severity) to 4 (extreme symptoms or maximum severity). CY-BOCS Score is from 0 to 20. A negative change score signifies improvement.

Time frame: Week 0 (Baseline), Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)

Population: Efficacy Sample, LOCF. The Efficacy Sample includes all patients that had a baseline and at least one post-baseline measurement of the same scale. A total of 322 patients met this criterion based on CGI-S evaluations. Of those, 96 patients did not have post-baseline evaluations for CY-BOCS, and were excluded from the efficacy analyses.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
De NovoChange From Baseline in Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS) Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Baseline12.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.6
De NovoChange From Baseline in Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS) Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Change at Endpoint (LOCF)-2.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.68
Rollover PlaceboChange From Baseline in Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS) Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Change at Endpoint (LOCF)-2.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.06
Rollover PlaceboChange From Baseline in Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS) Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Baseline12.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.96
Rollover AripiprazoleChange From Baseline in Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS) Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Baseline10.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.87
Rollover AripiprazoleChange From Baseline in Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS) Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Change at Endpoint (LOCF)0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.81
TotalChange From Baseline in Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS) Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Baseline11.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.2
TotalChange From Baseline in Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS) Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Change at Endpoint (LOCF)-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.23
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in ABC Hyperactivity Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)

The ABC is an informant-based symptom checklist for assessing and classifying problem behaviors of children and adolescents with mental retardation. The 58 items are rated on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all a problem to 3 = the problem is severe in degree), and resolve into 5 subscales: (1) irritability and agitation; (2) lethargy and social withdrawal; (3) stereotypic behavior; (4) hyperactivity and noncompliance, and (5) inappropriate speech. ABC Hyperactivity Subscale Score is from 0 to 48. A negative change score signifies improvement.

Time frame: Week 0 (Baseline), Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)

Population: Efficacy Sample, LOCF.The Efficacy Sample includes all patients that had a baseline and at least one post-baseline measurement of the same scale. A total of 322 patients met this criterion based on CGI-S evaluations. Of those, 8 patients had baseline ABC (all subscales) evaluations but no post-baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
De NovoMean Change From Baseline in ABC Hyperactivity Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Baseline28.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.87
De NovoMean Change From Baseline in ABC Hyperactivity Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Change at Endpoint (LOCF)-10.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.55
Rollover PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in ABC Hyperactivity Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Change at Endpoint (LOCF)-8.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.85
Rollover PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in ABC Hyperactivity Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Baseline25.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.18
Rollover AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline in ABC Hyperactivity Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Baseline18.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.03
Rollover AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline in ABC Hyperactivity Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Change at Endpoint (LOCF)0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.18
TotalMean Change From Baseline in ABC Hyperactivity Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Baseline22.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.79
TotalMean Change From Baseline in ABC Hyperactivity Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Change at Endpoint (LOCF)-4.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.92
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in ABC Inappropriate Speech Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)

The ABC is an informant-based symptom checklist for assessing and classifying problem behaviors of children and adolescents with mental retardation. The 58 items are rated on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all a problem to 3 = the problem is severe in degree), and resolve into 5 subscales: (1) irritability and agitation; (2) lethargy and social withdrawal; (3) stereotypic behavior; (4) hyperactivity and noncompliance, and (5) inappropriate speech. ABC Inappropriate Speech Subscale score is from 1 to 12. A negative change score signifies improvement.

Time frame: Week 0 (Baseline), Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)

Population: Efficacy Sample, LOCF

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
De NovoMean Change From Baseline in ABC Inappropriate Speech Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Baseline5.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.15
De NovoMean Change From Baseline in ABC Inappropriate Speech Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Change at Endpoint (LOCF)-1.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.66
Rollover PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in ABC Inappropriate Speech Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Change at Endpoint (LOCF)-1.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.94
Rollover PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in ABC Inappropriate Speech Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Baseline5.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.23
Rollover AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline in ABC Inappropriate Speech Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Baseline4.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.61
Rollover AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline in ABC Inappropriate Speech Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Change at Endpoint (LOCF)-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
TotalMean Change From Baseline in ABC Inappropriate Speech Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Baseline4.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.72
TotalMean Change From Baseline in ABC Inappropriate Speech Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Change at Endpoint (LOCF)-1.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.75
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in ABC Social Withdrawal Scale At Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)

The ABC is an informant-based symptom checklist for assessing and classifying problem behaviors of children and adolescents with mental retardation. The 58 items are rated on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all a problem to 3 = the problem is severe in degree), and resolve into 5 subscales: (1) irritability and agitation; (2) lethargy and social withdrawal; (3) stereotypic behavior; (4) hyperactivity and noncompliance, and (5) inappropriate speech. ABC Social Withdrawal Subscale Score is from 0 to 48. A negative change score signifies improvement.

Time frame: Week 0 (Baseline), Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)

Population: Efficacy Sample, LOCF. The Efficacy Sample includes all patients that had a baseline and at least one post-baseline measurement of the same scale. A total of 322 patients met this criterion based on CGI-S evaluations. Of those, 8 patients had baseline ABC (all subscales) evaluations but no post-baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
De NovoMean Change From Baseline in ABC Social Withdrawal Scale At Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Change at Endpoint (LOCF)-5.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.07
De NovoMean Change From Baseline in ABC Social Withdrawal Scale At Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Baseline14.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.62
Rollover PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in ABC Social Withdrawal Scale At Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Baseline11.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.24
Rollover PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in ABC Social Withdrawal Scale At Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Change at Endpoint (LOCF)-3.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.96
Rollover AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline in ABC Social Withdrawal Scale At Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Change at Endpoint (LOCF)-1.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.09
Rollover AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline in ABC Social Withdrawal Scale At Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Baseline10.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.86
TotalMean Change From Baseline in ABC Social Withdrawal Scale At Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Change at Endpoint (LOCF)-3.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.28
TotalMean Change From Baseline in ABC Social Withdrawal Scale At Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Baseline11.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.03
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) Irritability Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)

The ABC is an informant-based symptom checklist for assessing and classifying problem behaviors of children and adolescents with mental retardation. The 58 items are rated on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all a problem to 3 = the problem is severe in degree), and resolve into 5 subscales: (1) irritability and agitation; (2) lethargy and social withdrawal; (3) stereotypic behavior; (4) hyperactivity and noncompliance, and (5) inappropriate speech. ABC Irritability Subscale Score is from 0 to 45. A negative change signifies improvement

Time frame: Week 0 (Baseline), Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)

Population: Efficacy Sample, LOCF. The Efficacy Sample includes all patients that had a baseline and at least one post-baseline measurement of the same scale. A total of 322 patients met this criterion based on CGI-S evaluations. Of those, 8 patients had baseline ABC (all subscales) evaluations but no post-baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
De NovoMean Change From Baseline in Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) Irritability Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Baseline23.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.88
De NovoMean Change From Baseline in Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) Irritability Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Change at Endpoint (LOCF)-6.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.12
Rollover PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) Irritability Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Change at Endpoint (LOCF)-6.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.25
Rollover PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) Irritability Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Baseline21.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.82
Rollover AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline in Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) Irritability Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Baseline15.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.2
Rollover AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline in Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) Irritability Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Change at Endpoint (LOCF)0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.72
TotalMean Change From Baseline in Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) Irritability Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Baseline18.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.96
TotalMean Change From Baseline in Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) Irritability Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Change at Endpoint (LOCF)-2.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.98
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression (CGI)-Severity Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)

CGI scale is a global evaluation of improvement over time. CGI-Severity (CGI-S) is a clinician-rated assessment that evaluates the severity of a patient's condition on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (no symptoms) to 7 (very severe symptoms). CGI-Severity score is from 1 to 7. A negative change score signifies improvement.

Time frame: Week 0 (Baseline), Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)

Population: Efficacy Sample, LOCF. The Efficacy Sample includes all patients that had a baseline and at least one post-baseline measurement of the same scale. A total of 322 patients met this criterion based on CGI-S evaluations.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
De NovoMean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression (CGI)-Severity Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Baseline4.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.99
De NovoMean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression (CGI)-Severity Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Change at Endpoint (LOCF)-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.85
Rollover PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression (CGI)-Severity Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Change at Endpoint (LOCF)-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.06
Rollover PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression (CGI)-Severity Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Baseline4.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.99
Rollover AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression (CGI)-Severity Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Baseline3.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.05
Rollover AripiprazoleMean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression (CGI)-Severity Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Change at Endpoint (LOCF)-0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.01
TotalMean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression (CGI)-Severity Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Baseline4.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.08
TotalMean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression (CGI)-Severity Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)Change at Endpoint (LOCF)-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.04

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 5, 2026