Autistic Disorder, Behavioral Symptoms
Conditions
Keywords
Serious behavioral problems in children and adolescents with AD, behavioral problems
Brief summary
This study will provide long-term safety data for patients who are taking aripiprazole for up to 1 year. Most patients enrolled in this study will have participated in a short-term study with aripiprazole (CN138-178 \[NCT00332241\] or CN138-179 \[NCT00337571\]).
Interventions
Tablets, Oral, 2, 5, 10, or 15 mg, once daily, 52 weeks
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
- Rollover: * Completed 8 weeks of treatment in one of the following double-blind clinical trials: CN138-178 \[NCT00332241\] or CN138-179 \[NCT00337571\] * No significant protocol violations and sufficient medical justification to continue on open-label treatment with aripiprazole Inclusion Criteria - De Novo: * Meets current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV TR) diagnostic criteria for AD and demonstrates serious behavioral problems - diagnosis confirmed by Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R) or the patient meets the current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV TR) diagnostic criteria for AD and has a history of behavioral problems that are currently being treated with psychotropic medication * Mental age of at least 18 months * Male or female 6 to 17 years of age, inclusive, at the time of enrollment
Exclusion criteria
* Patients considered treatment resistant to neuroleptic medication based on lack of therapeutic response to 2 different neuroleptics after treatment of at least 3 weeks each * Patients previously treated and not responding to aripiprazole treatment * The patient is currently diagnosed with another disorder on the autism spectrum, including pervasive developmental disorder-not otherwise specified (PDD-NOS), Asperger's Disorder, Rett's Disorder, Fragile-X Syndrome or Childhood Disintegrative Disorder * Current diagnosis of bipolar disorder, psychosis, schizophrenia, or major depression * A seizure in the past year * History of severe head trauma or stroke * Non-pharmacologic therapy (e.g. psychotherapy, behavior modification) should be stable prior to screening and consistent throughout the study
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Deaths, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, Extra Pyramidal Syndrome (EPS)-Related AEs | From Screening (up to 42 days prior to treatment start) through Week 52 (end of study) for SAEs; from Week 0 (Baseline) through Week 52 (End of Study) for AEs | Participants with Adverse Events (AEs), Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), and AEs leading to study discontinuation. AE is defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition. SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a cancer, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, results in the development of drug dependency or drug abuse, is an important medical event. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Total Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52 | Baseline, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52 | The SAS is a 10-item instrument used to evaluate the presence and severity of parkinsonian symptomatology. It is the most commonly used rating scale for Parkinsonism in clinical trials over the past 25 years. The ten items focus on rigidity rather than bradykinesia, and do not assess subjective rigidity or slowness. Items are rated for severity on a 0-4 scale, with definitions given for each anchor point. The total SAS Score has a possible range from 10 to 50. Negative change scores indicate improvement. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52 | Baseline, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52 | The AIMS is an assessment of movement dysfunctions. It is a 12-item instrument assessing abnormal involuntary movements associated with antipsychotic drugs and 'spontaneous' motor disturbance related to the illness itself. Scoring the AIMS consists of rating the severity of movement in 3 main anatomic areas (facial/oral, extremities, and trunk), based on a five-point scale (0=none, 4=severe). The AIMS Total Score has a possible range from 0 to 28. Negative change scores indicate improvement in movement dysfunction. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Global Clinical Assessment at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52, and Endpoint | Baseline, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52 | The Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale is a 4-item scale to assess presence and severity of drug-induced akathisia, including both objective items and subjective items, together with a global clinical assessment of akathisia. Global assessment is made on a scale of 0 to 5 with comprehensive definitions provided for each anchor point on scale: 0=absent; 1=questionable; 2=mild akathisia; 3=moderate akathisia; 4=marked akathisia; 5=severe akathisia. Score has a possible range from 0 (absent) to 5 (severe akathisia). Negative change scores indicate improvement in akathisia. |
| Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | At screening (up to 42 days prior to treatment start), Week 8, Week 26, Week 52 | Abnormal metabolic criterion values include the following: fasting serum glucose ≥115 mg/dL; non-fasting serum glucose ≥ 200 mg/dL; total cholesterol ≥240 mg/dL; LDL cholesterol ≥160 mg/dL; HDL cholesterol ≤30 mg/dL; triglycerides ≥120 mg/dL (females), ≥160 mg/dL (males) |
| Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology Abnormalities | At screening (up to 42 days prior to treatment start), Week 8, Week 26, Week 52 | Abnormal hematology criterion values include the following: hematocrit (ages 6-17, males \& females) ≤33%; hemoglobin (ages 6-17, males \& females) \<11.3 g/dL; leukocytes ≤2800 c/mm3 or ≥16000 c/mm3; eosinophils (ages 6-17, males \& females) \>17%; neutrophils \<15%; platelet count ≤75,000 c/mm3 or ≥700,000 c/mm3 |
| Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | At screening (up to 42 days prior to treatment start), Week 8, Week 26, Week 52 | Abnormal chemistry criterion values include the following: aspartate aminotransferase ≥3x upper limit of normal (ULN); alanine aminotransferase ≥3x ULN; alkaline phosphatase ≥3x ULN; lactate dehydrogenase ≥3x ULN; creatinine ≥2.0 mg/dL; uric acid, ≥10.5 mg/dL (male), ≥8.5 mg/dL (female); bilirubin (Total) ≥2.0 mg/dL; serum prolactin \>ULN; creatine kinase ≥3x ULN; blood urea nitrogen ≥30 mg/dL; sodium ≤126 mEq/L or ≥156 mEq/L; potassium ≤2.5 mEq/L or ≥ 6.5 mEq/L; chloride ≤90 mEq/L or ≥118 mEq/L; calcium ≤8.2 mg/dL or ≥12 mg/dL |
| Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | At screening (up to 42 days prior to treatment start), Week 8, Week 26, Week 52 | These abbreviations are used in the table of ECG measurements: supraventricular (SV), baseline (BL), 1 degree (1°), atrioventricular (A-V), intraventricular (IVT), symmetrical (SYM), corrected QT interval (QTc). QRS complex is a recording of a single heartbeat on ECG corresponding to the depolarization of the right and left ventricles. PR interval is measured from beginning of P wave to beginning of QRS complex. QT interval is a measure of time between start of Q wave and end of T wave in the heart's electrical cycle. ↑ = increase from baseline, ↓ = decrease from baseline, → = "to" |
| Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | At screening (up to 42 days prior to treatment start), Week 0 (Baseline), Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 14, Week 20, Week 26, Week 34, Week 42, Week 52 (Endpoint) | Clinically significantly abnormal vital signs met age-appropriate (heart rate cohorts: ages 5-14 \& ages 15+; blood pressure cohorts: ages 6-12 \& ages 13-17) criterion AND represented change from pretreatment value of at least the following magnitudes: systolic blood pressure (≥130 mmHg \& ≥144 mmHg w/ increase of ≥20 mmHg) or (≤117 mmHg \& ≤120 mmHg w/ decrease of ≥20 mmHg); diastolic blood pressure (≥86 mmHg \& ≥92 mmHg w/ increase of ≥15 mmHg) or (≤75 mm Hg \& ≤80 mmHg w/ decrease of ≥15 mmHg); heart rate (140 bpm and 120 bpm w/ increase of ≥15 bpm) or (50 bpm and 50 bpm w/ decrease of ≥15 bpm). |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight | At screening (up to 42 days prior to treatment start), Week 0 (Baseline), Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 14, Week 20, Week 26, Week 34, Week 42, Week 52 (Endpoint) | — |
| Mean Change From Baseline by Time Period in Body Weight Z-Score | At screening (up to 42 days prior to treatment start), Week 0 (Baseline), Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 14, Week 20, Week 26, Week 34, Week 42, Week 52 (Endpoint) | The Z-Score indicates how many standard deviations a person is from the population norm values. The body weight z-scores are designed to take into account the amount of weight gain that would be expected due to normal growth in children and adolescents. The body weight z-scores are by age and gender standardized values (corresponding to a normal distribution with mean 0 and a standard deviation of 1) of the actual weight measurements, based on the Growth Charts provided by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC; see Links section of this record). Subjects included in the period evaluation had a baseline and at least 1 measurement within the time period that was assessed. Patients are only counted once in each time period but can appear in multiple time periods. For those with multiple records in 1 time period, only the last record in that period is included in calculations. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Body Mass Index (BMI) | At screening (up to 42 days prior to treatment start), Week 0 (Baseline), Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 14, Week 20, Week 26, Week 34, Week 42, Week 52 (Endpoint) | The body mass index (BMI) is a statistical measurement which compares a person's weight and height. Though it does not actually measure the percentage of body fat, it is used to estimate a healthy body weight based on subject height. |
| Mean Change From Baseline By Time Period in BMI Z-Score | At screening (up to 42 days prior to treatment start), Week 0 (Baseline), Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 14, Week 20, Week 26, Week 34, Week 42, Week 52 (Endpoint) | The Z-Score indicates how many standard deviations a person is from the population norm values. The BMI z-scores are designed to take into account the BMI that would be expected due to normal growth in children and adolescents. The BMI z-scores are by age and gender standardized values (corresponding to a normal distribution with mean 0 and a standard deviation of 1) of the actual BMI measurements, based on the Growth Charts provided by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC; see Links section of this record). Subjects included in the period evaluation had a baseline and at least 1 measurement within the time period that was assessed. Patients are only counted once in each time period but can appear in multiple time periods. For those with multiple records in 1 time period, only the last record in that period is included in calculations. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression (CGI)-Severity Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Week 0 (Baseline), Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | CGI scale is a global evaluation of improvement over time. CGI-Severity (CGI-S) is a clinician-rated assessment that evaluates the severity of a patient's condition on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (no symptoms) to 7 (very severe symptoms). CGI-Severity score is from 1 to 7. A negative change score signifies improvement. |
| CGI-Improvement Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | CGI scale is a global evaluation of improvement over time. CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) is a clinician rated assessment that evaluates improvement relative to symptoms at baseline on a a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). CGI-I Score is from 1 to 7. A lower score signifies larger improvement. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) Irritability Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Week 0 (Baseline), Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | The ABC is an informant-based symptom checklist for assessing and classifying problem behaviors of children and adolescents with mental retardation. The 58 items are rated on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all a problem to 3 = the problem is severe in degree), and resolve into 5 subscales: (1) irritability and agitation; (2) lethargy and social withdrawal; (3) stereotypic behavior; (4) hyperactivity and noncompliance, and (5) inappropriate speech. ABC Irritability Subscale Score is from 0 to 45. A negative change signifies improvement |
| Mean Change From Baseline in ABC Hyperactivity Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Week 0 (Baseline), Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | The ABC is an informant-based symptom checklist for assessing and classifying problem behaviors of children and adolescents with mental retardation. The 58 items are rated on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all a problem to 3 = the problem is severe in degree), and resolve into 5 subscales: (1) irritability and agitation; (2) lethargy and social withdrawal; (3) stereotypic behavior; (4) hyperactivity and noncompliance, and (5) inappropriate speech. ABC Hyperactivity Subscale Score is from 0 to 48. A negative change score signifies improvement. |
| Change From Baseline in ABC Stereotypy Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Week 0 (Baseline), Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | The ABC is an informant-based symptom checklist for assessing and classifying problem behaviors of children and adolescents with mental retardation. The 58 items are rated on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all a problem to 3 = the problem is severe in degree), and resolve into 5 subscales: (1) irritability and agitation; (2) lethargy and social withdrawal; (3) stereotypic behavior; (4) hyperactivity and noncompliance, and (5) inappropriate speech. ABC Stereotypy Subscale Score is from 0 to 21. A negative change score signifies improvement. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in ABC Social Withdrawal Scale At Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Week 0 (Baseline), Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | The ABC is an informant-based symptom checklist for assessing and classifying problem behaviors of children and adolescents with mental retardation. The 58 items are rated on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all a problem to 3 = the problem is severe in degree), and resolve into 5 subscales: (1) irritability and agitation; (2) lethargy and social withdrawal; (3) stereotypic behavior; (4) hyperactivity and noncompliance, and (5) inappropriate speech. ABC Social Withdrawal Subscale Score is from 0 to 48. A negative change score signifies improvement. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in ABC Inappropriate Speech Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Week 0 (Baseline), Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | The ABC is an informant-based symptom checklist for assessing and classifying problem behaviors of children and adolescents with mental retardation. The 58 items are rated on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all a problem to 3 = the problem is severe in degree), and resolve into 5 subscales: (1) irritability and agitation; (2) lethargy and social withdrawal; (3) stereotypic behavior; (4) hyperactivity and noncompliance, and (5) inappropriate speech. ABC Inappropriate Speech Subscale score is from 1 to 12. A negative change score signifies improvement. |
| Change From Baseline in Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS) Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Week 0 (Baseline), Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | CY-BOCS is a 10-item, clinician-rated scale designed to measure the severity of obsessive-compulsive symptoms in patients below the age of 18. The scale contains 5 items pertaining to obsessions (which were not used in this trial) and 5 items pertaining to compulsions, which rated each symptom domain in terms of time spent, interference with functioning, distress, resistance, and control. Each item was rated on a 5-point scale, from 0 (no symptoms or minimum severity) to 4 (extreme symptoms or maximum severity). CY-BOCS Score is from 0 to 20. A negative change score signifies improvement. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
109 participants were enrolled in the De Novo arm, 70 in the Rollover Placebo arm, and 174 in the Rollover Aripiprazole arm. 23 participants in the De Novo arm were considered "baseline failures," and did not enter the treatment phase.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| De Novo As previously described in Participant Flow | 86 |
| Rollover Placebo As previously described in Participant Flow | 70 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole As previously described in Participant Flow | 174 |
| Total | 330 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | De Novo | Rollover Placebo | Rollover Aripiprazole | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 9.7 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.13 | 9.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.95 | 9.5 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 3 | 9.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.02 |
| Age, Customized 13 to 17 years | 17 Participants | 14 Participants | 36 Participants | 67 Participants |
| Age, Customized 6 to 12 years | 69 Participants | 56 Participants | 138 Participants | 263 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 16 Participants | 8 Participants | 19 Participants | 43 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 70 Participants | 62 Participants | 155 Participants | 287 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| other Total, other adverse events | 73 / 86 | 136 / 174 | 61 / 70 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 3 / 86 | 5 / 174 | 1 / 70 |
Outcome results
Mean Change From Baseline By Time Period in BMI Z-Score
The Z-Score indicates how many standard deviations a person is from the population norm values. The BMI z-scores are designed to take into account the BMI that would be expected due to normal growth in children and adolescents. The BMI z-scores are by age and gender standardized values (corresponding to a normal distribution with mean 0 and a standard deviation of 1) of the actual BMI measurements, based on the Growth Charts provided by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC; see Links section of this record).
Time frame: At screening (up to 42 days prior to treatment start), Week 0 (Baseline), Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 14, Week 20, Week 26, Week 34, Week 42, Week 52 (Endpoint)
Population: Safety Sample. Subjects included in the period evaluation had a baseline and at least 1 measurement within the time period that was assessed. Patients are only counted once in each time period but can appear in multiple time periods. For those with multiple records in 1 time period, only the last record in that period is included in calculations.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| De Novo | Mean Change From Baseline By Time Period in BMI Z-Score | 3-6 Months (n=73, 56, 145, 274) | 0.29 Standard Deviations away from Population | Standard Deviation 0.625 |
| De Novo | Mean Change From Baseline By Time Period in BMI Z-Score | Baseline (n=84, 70, 169, 323) | 0.44 Standard Deviations away from Population | Standard Deviation 1.591 |
| De Novo | Mean Change From Baseline By Time Period in BMI Z-Score | 6-9 Months (n=62, 49, 129, 240) | 0.36 Standard Deviations away from Population | Standard Deviation 0.647 |
| De Novo | Mean Change From Baseline By Time Period in BMI Z-Score | <=3 Months (n=84, 70, 169, 323) | 0.17 Standard Deviations away from Population | Standard Deviation 0.436 |
| De Novo | Mean Change From Baseline By Time Period in BMI Z-Score | >9 Months (n=59, 44, 115, 218) | 0.33 Standard Deviations away from Population | Standard Deviation 0.768 |
| Rollover Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline By Time Period in BMI Z-Score | 3-6 Months (n=73, 56, 145, 274) | 0.28 Standard Deviations away from Population | Standard Deviation 0.388 |
| Rollover Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline By Time Period in BMI Z-Score | <=3 Months (n=84, 70, 169, 323) | 0.12 Standard Deviations away from Population | Standard Deviation 0.268 |
| Rollover Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline By Time Period in BMI Z-Score | 6-9 Months (n=62, 49, 129, 240) | 0.24 Standard Deviations away from Population | Standard Deviation 0.438 |
| Rollover Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline By Time Period in BMI Z-Score | Baseline (n=84, 70, 169, 323) | 0.98 Standard Deviations away from Population | Standard Deviation 0.997 |
| Rollover Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline By Time Period in BMI Z-Score | >9 Months (n=59, 44, 115, 218) | 0.15 Standard Deviations away from Population | Standard Deviation 0.476 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline By Time Period in BMI Z-Score | 6-9 Months (n=62, 49, 129, 240) | 0.18 Standard Deviations away from Population | Standard Deviation 0.643 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline By Time Period in BMI Z-Score | Baseline (n=84, 70, 169, 323) | 1.01 Standard Deviations away from Population | Standard Deviation 1.236 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline By Time Period in BMI Z-Score | <=3 Months (n=84, 70, 169, 323) | 0.09 Standard Deviations away from Population | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline By Time Period in BMI Z-Score | 3-6 Months (n=73, 56, 145, 274) | 0.18 Standard Deviations away from Population | Standard Deviation 0.549 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline By Time Period in BMI Z-Score | >9 Months (n=59, 44, 115, 218) | 0.14 Standard Deviations away from Population | Standard Deviation 0.775 |
| Total | Mean Change From Baseline By Time Period in BMI Z-Score | 6-9 Months (n=62, 49, 129, 240) | 0.24 Standard Deviations away from Population | Standard Deviation 0.611 |
| Total | Mean Change From Baseline By Time Period in BMI Z-Score | <=3 Months (n=84, 70, 169, 323) | 0.12 Standard Deviations away from Population | Standard Deviation 0.443 |
| Total | Mean Change From Baseline By Time Period in BMI Z-Score | Baseline (n=84, 70, 169, 323) | 0.86 Standard Deviations away from Population | Standard Deviation 1.313 |
| Total | Mean Change From Baseline By Time Period in BMI Z-Score | >9 Months (n=59, 44, 115, 218) | 0.19 Standard Deviations away from Population | Standard Deviation 0.725 |
| Total | Mean Change From Baseline By Time Period in BMI Z-Score | 3-6 Months (n=73, 56, 145, 274) | 0.23 Standard Deviations away from Population | Standard Deviation 0.543 |
Mean Change From Baseline by Time Period in Body Weight Z-Score
The Z-Score indicates how many standard deviations a person is from the population norm values. The body weight z-scores are designed to take into account the amount of weight gain that would be expected due to normal growth in children and adolescents. The body weight z-scores are by age and gender standardized values (corresponding to a normal distribution with mean 0 and a standard deviation of 1) of the actual weight measurements, based on the Growth Charts provided by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC; see Links section of this record).
Time frame: At screening (up to 42 days prior to treatment start), Week 0 (Baseline), Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 14, Week 20, Week 26, Week 34, Week 42, Week 52 (Endpoint)
Population: Safety Sample. Subjects included in the period evaluation had a baseline and at least 1 measurement within the time period that was assessed. Patients are only counted once in each time period but can appear in multiple time periods. For those with multiple records in 1 time period, only the last record in that period is included in calculations.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| De Novo | Mean Change From Baseline by Time Period in Body Weight Z-Score | 6-9 Months (n=63, 49, 131, 243) | 0.31 Standard Deviations away from Population | Standard Deviation 0.57 |
| De Novo | Mean Change From Baseline by Time Period in Body Weight Z-Score | <= 3 Months (n=84, 70, 169, 323) | 0.13 Standard Deviations away from Population | Standard Deviation 0.283 |
| De Novo | Mean Change From Baseline by Time Period in Body Weight Z-Score | >9 Months (n=59, 44, 115, 218) | 0.33 Standard Deviations away from Population | Standard Deviation 0.58 |
| De Novo | Mean Change From Baseline by Time Period in Body Weight Z-Score | 3-6 Months (n=73, 56, 145, 274) | 0.24 Standard Deviations away from Population | Standard Deviation 0.433 |
| De Novo | Mean Change From Baseline by Time Period in Body Weight Z-Score | Baseline (n=84, 70, 169, 323) | 0.47 Standard Deviations away from Population | Standard Deviation 1.687 |
| Rollover Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline by Time Period in Body Weight Z-Score | 3-6 Months (n=73, 56, 145, 274) | 0.26 Standard Deviations away from Population | Standard Deviation 0.331 |
| Rollover Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline by Time Period in Body Weight Z-Score | 6-9 Months (n=63, 49, 131, 243) | 0.28 Standard Deviations away from Population | Standard Deviation 0.367 |
| Rollover Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline by Time Period in Body Weight Z-Score | >9 Months (n=59, 44, 115, 218) | 0.23 Standard Deviations away from Population | Standard Deviation 0.399 |
| Rollover Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline by Time Period in Body Weight Z-Score | <= 3 Months (n=84, 70, 169, 323) | 0.10 Standard Deviations away from Population | Standard Deviation 0.204 |
| Rollover Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline by Time Period in Body Weight Z-Score | Baseline (n=84, 70, 169, 323) | 0.95 Standard Deviations away from Population | Standard Deviation 1.112 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline by Time Period in Body Weight Z-Score | 3-6 Months (n=73, 56, 145, 274) | 0.20 Standard Deviations away from Population | Standard Deviation 0.327 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline by Time Period in Body Weight Z-Score | Baseline (n=84, 70, 169, 323) | 0.98 Standard Deviations away from Population | Standard Deviation 1.392 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline by Time Period in Body Weight Z-Score | <= 3 Months (n=84, 70, 169, 323) | 0.09 Standard Deviations away from Population | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline by Time Period in Body Weight Z-Score | 6-9 Months (n=63, 49, 131, 243) | 0.23 Standard Deviations away from Population | Standard Deviation 0.407 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline by Time Period in Body Weight Z-Score | >9 Months (n=59, 44, 115, 218) | 0.24 Standard Deviations away from Population | Standard Deviation 0.465 |
| Total | Mean Change From Baseline by Time Period in Body Weight Z-Score | 6-9 Months (n=63, 49, 131, 243) | 0.26 Standard Deviations away from Population | Standard Deviation 0.448 |
| Total | Mean Change From Baseline by Time Period in Body Weight Z-Score | <= 3 Months (n=84, 70, 169, 323) | 0.10 Standard Deviations away from Population | Standard Deviation 0.277 |
| Total | Mean Change From Baseline by Time Period in Body Weight Z-Score | Baseline (n=84, 70, 169, 323) | 0.84 Standard Deviations away from Population | Standard Deviation 1.434 |
| Total | Mean Change From Baseline by Time Period in Body Weight Z-Score | 3-6 Months (n=73, 56, 145, 274) | 0.22 Standard Deviations away from Population | Standard Deviation 0.359 |
| Total | Mean Change From Baseline by Time Period in Body Weight Z-Score | >9 Months (n=59, 44, 115, 218) | 0.26 Standard Deviations away from Population | Standard Deviation 0.486 |
Mean Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52
The AIMS is an assessment of movement dysfunctions. It is a 12-item instrument assessing abnormal involuntary movements associated with antipsychotic drugs and 'spontaneous' motor disturbance related to the illness itself. Scoring the AIMS consists of rating the severity of movement in 3 main anatomic areas (facial/oral, extremities, and trunk), based on a five-point scale (0=none, 4=severe). The AIMS Total Score has a possible range from 0 to 28. Negative change scores indicate improvement in movement dysfunction.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Population: Safety Sample - Observed Cases (OC) Data Set and Endpoint - Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| De Novo | Mean Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52 | Change at Week 52 (n=48, 36, 93, 177) | -0.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.44 |
| De Novo | Mean Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52 | Baseline (n=79, 67, 155, 301) | 0.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.9 |
| De Novo | Mean Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52 | Change at Endpoint (LOCF) (n=79, 67, 155, 301) | -0.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.33 |
| De Novo | Mean Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52 | Change at Week 8 (n=78, 64, 149, 291) | -0.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.45 |
| De Novo | Mean Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52 | Change at Week 26 (n=61, 49, 130, 240) | -0.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.37 |
| Rollover Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52 | Baseline (n=79, 67, 155, 301) | 0.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.02 |
| Rollover Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52 | Change at Week 26 (n=61, 49, 130, 240) | -0.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.3 |
| Rollover Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52 | Change at Week 8 (n=78, 64, 149, 291) | -0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.87 |
| Rollover Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52 | Change at Endpoint (LOCF) (n=79, 67, 155, 301) | 0.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.44 |
| Rollover Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52 | Change at Week 52 (n=48, 36, 93, 177) | -0.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52 | Change at Endpoint (LOCF) (n=79, 67, 155, 301) | -0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.32 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52 | Change at Week 52 (n=48, 36, 93, 177) | -0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.13 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52 | Change at Week 26 (n=61, 49, 130, 240) | -0.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.26 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52 | Baseline (n=79, 67, 155, 301) | 0.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.23 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52 | Change at Week 8 (n=78, 64, 149, 291) | -0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.15 |
| Total | Mean Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52 | Change at Endpoint (LOCF) (n=79, 67, 155, 301) | -0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.35 |
| Total | Mean Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52 | Baseline (n=79, 67, 155, 301) | 0.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.4 |
| Total | Mean Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52 | Change at Week 8 (n=78, 64, 149, 291) | -0.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.18 |
| Total | Mean Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52 | Change at Week 52 (n=48, 36, 93, 177) | -0.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.2 |
| Total | Mean Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52 | Change at Week 26 (n=61, 49, 130, 240) | -0.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.3 |
Mean Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Global Clinical Assessment at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52, and Endpoint
The Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale is a 4-item scale to assess presence and severity of drug-induced akathisia, including both objective items and subjective items, together with a global clinical assessment of akathisia. Global assessment is made on a scale of 0 to 5 with comprehensive definitions provided for each anchor point on scale: 0=absent; 1=questionable; 2=mild akathisia; 3=moderate akathisia; 4=marked akathisia; 5=severe akathisia. Score has a possible range from 0 (absent) to 5 (severe akathisia). Negative change scores indicate improvement in akathisia.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Population: Safety Sample - Observed Cases (OC) Data Set and Endpoint - Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| De Novo | Mean Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Global Clinical Assessment at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52, and Endpoint | Change at Week 8 (n=78, 60, 149, 287) | -0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.55 |
| De Novo | Mean Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Global Clinical Assessment at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52, and Endpoint | Baseline (n=79, 64, 154, 297) | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.57 |
| De Novo | Mean Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Global Clinical Assessment at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52, and Endpoint | Change at Week 26 (n=61, 47, 129, 237) | -0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.64 |
| De Novo | Mean Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Global Clinical Assessment at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52, and Endpoint | Change at Endpoint (LOCF) (n=79, 64, 154, 297) | 0.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.67 |
| De Novo | Mean Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Global Clinical Assessment at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52, and Endpoint | Change at Week 52 (n=48, 35, 93, 176) | -0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.37 |
| Rollover Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Global Clinical Assessment at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52, and Endpoint | Baseline (n=79, 64, 154, 297) | 0.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.54 |
| Rollover Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Global Clinical Assessment at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52, and Endpoint | Change at Endpoint (LOCF) (n=79, 64, 154, 297) | 0.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.52 |
| Rollover Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Global Clinical Assessment at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52, and Endpoint | Change at Week 8 (n=78, 60, 149, 287) | -0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Rollover Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Global Clinical Assessment at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52, and Endpoint | Change at Week 26 (n=61, 47, 129, 237) | -0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.48 |
| Rollover Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Global Clinical Assessment at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52, and Endpoint | Change at Week 52 (n=48, 35, 93, 176) | 0.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.49 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Global Clinical Assessment at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52, and Endpoint | Change at Week 8 (n=78, 60, 149, 287) | 0.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.35 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Global Clinical Assessment at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52, and Endpoint | Change at Week 26 (n=61, 47, 129, 237) | 0.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.41 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Global Clinical Assessment at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52, and Endpoint | Change at Week 52 (n=48, 35, 93, 176) | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.56 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Global Clinical Assessment at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52, and Endpoint | Baseline (n=79, 64, 154, 297) | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.41 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Global Clinical Assessment at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52, and Endpoint | Change at Endpoint (LOCF) (n=79, 64, 154, 297) | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.58 |
| Total | Mean Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Global Clinical Assessment at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52, and Endpoint | Change at Week 8 (n=78, 60, 149, 287) | 0.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.44 |
| Total | Mean Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Global Clinical Assessment at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52, and Endpoint | Change at Week 52 (n=48, 35, 93, 176) | 0.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Total | Mean Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Global Clinical Assessment at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52, and Endpoint | Change at Week 26 (n=61, 47, 129, 237) | 0.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Total | Mean Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Global Clinical Assessment at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52, and Endpoint | Baseline (n=79, 64, 154, 297) | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.49 |
| Total | Mean Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Global Clinical Assessment at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52, and Endpoint | Change at Endpoint (LOCF) (n=79, 64, 154, 297) | 0.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.59 |
Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Body Mass Index (BMI)
The body mass index (BMI) is a statistical measurement which compares a person's weight and height. Though it does not actually measure the percentage of body fat, it is used to estimate a healthy body weight based on subject height.
Time frame: At screening (up to 42 days prior to treatment start), Week 0 (Baseline), Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 14, Week 20, Week 26, Week 34, Week 42, Week 52 (Endpoint)
Population: Safety Sample: Endpoint - Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| De Novo | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Body Mass Index (BMI) | Baseline (n=84, 69, 169, 322) | 20.1 kg/m2 | Standard Deviation 6.31 |
| De Novo | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Body Mass Index (BMI) | Change at Endpoint (LOCF) (n=84, 69, 169, 322) | 1.7 kg/m2 | Standard Deviation 2.56 |
| Rollover Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Body Mass Index (BMI) | Change at Endpoint (LOCF) (n=84, 69, 169, 322) | 1.4 kg/m2 | Standard Deviation 2.07 |
| Rollover Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Body Mass Index (BMI) | Baseline (n=84, 69, 169, 322) | 21.0 kg/m2 | Standard Deviation 5.15 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Body Mass Index (BMI) | Baseline (n=84, 69, 169, 322) | 21.6 kg/m2 | Standard Deviation 6.38 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Body Mass Index (BMI) | Change at Endpoint (LOCF) (n=84, 69, 169, 322) | 1.8 kg/m2 | Standard Deviation 2.51 |
| Total | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Body Mass Index (BMI) | Baseline (n=84, 69, 169, 322) | 21.1 kg/m2 | Standard Deviation 6.13 |
| Total | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Body Mass Index (BMI) | Change at Endpoint (LOCF) (n=84, 69, 169, 322) | 1.7 kg/m2 | Standard Deviation 2.43 |
Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight
Time frame: At screening (up to 42 days prior to treatment start), Week 0 (Baseline), Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 14, Week 20, Week 26, Week 34, Week 42, Week 52 (Endpoint)
Population: Safety Sample - Observed Cases (OC) Data Set and Endpoint - Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| De Novo | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight | Change at Week 42 (n=58, 43, 115, 216) | 7.0 kg | Standard Deviation 6.46 |
| De Novo | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight | Change at Endpoint (LOCF) (n=84, 69, 169, 322) | 6.3 kg | Standard Deviation 6.71 |
| De Novo | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight | Change at Week 26 (n=61, 49, 130, 240) | 5.0 kg | Standard Deviation 4.41 |
| De Novo | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight | Baseline (n=84, 69, 169, 322) | 42.5 kg | Standard Deviation 23.17 |
| De Novo | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight | Change at Week 34 (n=60, 46, 123, 229) | 6.0 kg | Standard Deviation 5.8 |
| De Novo | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight | Change at Week 2 (n=81, 67, 165, 313) | 0.2 kg | Standard Deviation 0.99 |
| De Novo | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight | Change at Week 4 (n=80, 67, 165, 312) | 0.8 kg | Standard Deviation 1.26 |
| De Novo | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight | Change at Week 1 (n=78, 58, 149, 285) | 0.2 kg | Standard Deviation 0.76 |
| De Novo | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight | Change at Week 52 (n=48, 36, 94, 178) | 8.7 kg | Standard Deviation 6.77 |
| De Novo | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight | Change at Week 8 (n=77, 65, 149, 291) | 1.6 kg | Standard Deviation 1.99 |
| De Novo | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight | Change at Week 14 (n=71, 55, 142, 268) | 3.3 kg | Standard Deviation 2.81 |
| De Novo | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight | Change at Week 20 (n=66, 50, 136, 252) | 4.0 kg | Standard Deviation 3.39 |
| Rollover Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight | Change at Week 1 (n=78, 58, 149, 285) | -0.1 kg | Standard Deviation 1.06 |
| Rollover Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight | Change at Week 20 (n=66, 50, 136, 252) | 3.3 kg | Standard Deviation 4.73 |
| Rollover Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight | Change at Week 4 (n=80, 67, 165, 312) | 0.5 kg | Standard Deviation 1.6 |
| Rollover Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight | Change at Week 34 (n=60, 46, 123, 229) | 5.8 kg | Standard Deviation 4.9 |
| Rollover Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight | Change at Week 42 (n=58, 43, 115, 216) | 6.4 kg | Standard Deviation 5.9 |
| Rollover Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight | Change at Week 26 (n=61, 49, 130, 240) | 4.7 kg | Standard Deviation 4.36 |
| Rollover Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight | Baseline (n=84, 69, 169, 322) | 45.1 kg | Standard Deviation 20.37 |
| Rollover Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight | Change at Week 14 (n=71, 55, 142, 268) | 2.8 kg | Standard Deviation 2.79 |
| Rollover Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight | Change at Week 8 (n=77, 65, 149, 291) | 1.5 kg | Standard Deviation 2.29 |
| Rollover Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight | Change at Week 2 (n=81, 67, 165, 313) | 0.0 kg | Standard Deviation 1.47 |
| Rollover Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight | Change at Endpoint (LOCF) (n=84, 69, 169, 322) | 5.5 kg | Standard Deviation 5.5 |
| Rollover Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight | Change at Week 52 (n=48, 36, 94, 178) | 7.7 kg | Standard Deviation 6.44 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight | Change at Week 26 (n=61, 49, 130, 240) | 4.9 kg | Standard Deviation 3.99 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight | Baseline (n=84, 69, 169, 322) | 45.4 kg | Standard Deviation 21.79 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight | Change at Week 1 (n=78, 58, 149, 285) | 0.4 kg | Standard Deviation 0.94 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight | Change at Week 2 (n=81, 67, 165, 313) | 0.8 kg | Standard Deviation 1.15 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight | Change at Week 4 (n=80, 67, 165, 312) | 1.2 kg | Standard Deviation 1.43 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight | Change at Week 8 (n=77, 65, 149, 291) | 1.9 kg | Standard Deviation 2.09 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight | Change at Week 14 (n=71, 55, 142, 268) | 3.1 kg | Standard Deviation 2.8 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight | Change at Week 20 (n=66, 50, 136, 252) | 4.2 kg | Standard Deviation 3.34 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight | Change at Week 34 (n=60, 46, 123, 229) | 6.1 kg | Standard Deviation 4.68 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight | Change at Week 42 (n=58, 43, 115, 216) | 7.1 kg | Standard Deviation 5.11 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight | Change at Week 52 (n=48, 36, 94, 178) | 7.9 kg | Standard Deviation 5.9 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight | Change at Endpoint (LOCF) (n=84, 69, 169, 322) | 6.6 kg | Standard Deviation 5.72 |
| Total | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight | Change at Week 14 (n=71, 55, 142, 268) | 3.1 kg | Standard Deviation 2.8 |
| Total | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight | Change at Week 8 (n=77, 65, 149, 291) | 1.8 kg | Standard Deviation 2.11 |
| Total | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight | Baseline (n=84, 69, 169, 322) | 44.6 kg | Standard Deviation 21.83 |
| Total | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight | Change at Week 42 (n=58, 43, 115, 216) | 6.9 kg | Standard Deviation 5.64 |
| Total | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight | Change at Week 4 (n=80, 67, 165, 312) | 1.0 kg | Standard Deviation 1.45 |
| Total | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight | Change at Week 2 (n=81, 67, 165, 313) | 0.5 kg | Standard Deviation 1.23 |
| Total | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight | Change at Endpoint (LOCF) (n=84, 69, 169, 322) | 6.3 kg | Standard Deviation 5.94 |
| Total | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight | Change at Week 52 (n=48, 36, 94, 178) | 8.1 kg | Standard Deviation 6.23 |
| Total | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight | Change at Week 26 (n=61, 49, 130, 240) | 4.9 kg | Standard Deviation 4.16 |
| Total | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight | Change at Week 20 (n=66, 50, 136, 252) | 4.0 kg | Standard Deviation 3.67 |
| Total | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight | Change at Week 1 (n=78, 58, 149, 285) | 0.3 kg | Standard Deviation 0.94 |
| Total | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Weight | Change at Week 34 (n=60, 46, 123, 229) | 6.0 kg | Standard Deviation 5.02 |
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52
The SAS is a 10-item instrument used to evaluate the presence and severity of parkinsonian symptomatology. It is the most commonly used rating scale for Parkinsonism in clinical trials over the past 25 years. The ten items focus on rigidity rather than bradykinesia, and do not assess subjective rigidity or slowness. Items are rated for severity on a 0-4 scale, with definitions given for each anchor point. The total SAS Score has a possible range from 10 to 50. Negative change scores indicate improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Population: Safety Sample - Observed Cases (OC) Data Set and Endpoint - Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| De Novo | Mean Change From Baseline in Total Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52 | Change at Week 26 (n=61, 47, 126, 234) | -0.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.59 |
| De Novo | Mean Change From Baseline in Total Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52 | Change at Endpoint (LOCF) (n=79, 63, 153, 295) | -0.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.7 |
| De Novo | Mean Change From Baseline in Total Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52 | Change at Week 8 (n=77, 60, 145, 282) | -0.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.13 |
| De Novo | Mean Change From Baseline in Total Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52 | Change at Week 52 (n=48, 36, 91, 175) | -0.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.44 |
| De Novo | Mean Change From Baseline in Total Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52 | Baseline (n=79, 63, 153, 295) | 10.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.4 |
| Rollover Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Total Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52 | Change at Week 52 (n=48, 36, 91, 175) | 0.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.8 |
| Rollover Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Total Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52 | Change at Endpoint (LOCF) (n=79, 63, 153, 295) | 0.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.59 |
| Rollover Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Total Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52 | Baseline (n=79, 63, 153, 295) | 10.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.17 |
| Rollover Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Total Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52 | Change at Week 8 (n=77, 60, 145, 282) | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.51 |
| Rollover Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Total Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52 | Change at Week 26 (n=61, 47, 126, 234) | 0.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.42 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline in Total Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52 | Baseline (n=79, 63, 153, 295) | 11.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.11 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline in Total Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52 | Change at Endpoint (LOCF) (n=79, 63, 153, 295) | -0.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.06 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline in Total Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52 | Change at Week 26 (n=61, 47, 126, 234) | -0.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.96 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline in Total Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52 | Change at Week 52 (n=48, 36, 91, 175) | -0.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.82 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline in Total Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52 | Change at Week 8 (n=77, 60, 145, 282) | -0.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.12 |
| Total | Mean Change From Baseline in Total Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52 | Change at Endpoint (LOCF) (n=79, 63, 153, 295) | -0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.89 |
| Total | Mean Change From Baseline in Total Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52 | Baseline (n=79, 63, 153, 295) | 10.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.77 |
| Total | Mean Change From Baseline in Total Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52 | Change at Week 8 (n=77, 60, 145, 282) | -0.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.78 |
| Total | Mean Change From Baseline in Total Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52 | Change at Week 26 (n=61, 47, 126, 234) | -0.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.79 |
| Total | Mean Change From Baseline in Total Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) At Week 8, Week 26, and Week 52 | Change at Week 52 (n=48, 36, 91, 175) | -0.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.75 |
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities
These abbreviations are used in the table of ECG measurements: supraventricular (SV), baseline (BL), 1 degree (1°), atrioventricular (A-V), intraventricular (IVT), symmetrical (SYM), corrected QT interval (QTc). QRS complex is a recording of a single heartbeat on ECG corresponding to the depolarization of the right and left ventricles. PR interval is measured from beginning of P wave to beginning of QRS complex. QT interval is a measure of time between start of Q wave and end of T wave in the heart's electrical cycle. ↑ = increase from baseline, ↓ = decrease from baseline, → = to
Time frame: At screening (up to 42 days prior to treatment start), Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Population: Safety Sample
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Right Bundle Branch Block (not present → present) | 0 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Left Bundle Branch Block (not present → present) | 0 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | 2° A-V block (not present → present) | 0 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Ventricular Tachycardia (not present → present) | 0 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | 1° A-V Block (PR ≥ 0.20 sec and ↑ ≥ 0.05 sec) | 0 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Atrial Flutter (not present → present) | 0 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Atrial Fibrillation (not present → present) | 0 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | QTcB interval (>475 msec & elevation 10% over BL) | 1 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | SYM T-Wave Inversion (not present → present) | 0 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Sinus Bradycardia (≤50 bpm and ↓ ≥15 bpm) | 0 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Other Abnormality | 3 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | 3° A-V block (not present → present) | 0 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Myocardial Ischemia (not present → present) | 0 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Acute/Subacute Infarction (not present → present) | 0 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | SV Premature Beat (≥2per10sec & ↑ over BL) | 0 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | QTcF interval (>475 msec & elevation 10% over BL) | 1 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Old Infarction (not present-present at ≥12 weeks) | 0 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Other ITV Block (QRS ≥ 0.10 sec & ↑ 0.02 sec) | 0 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Ventricular Premature Beat(≥1per10sec & ↑ over BL) | 0 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Sinus Tachycardia (≥140 bpm & ↑ ≥15 bpm) | 2 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Pre-Excitation Syndrome (not present → present) | 0 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | SV Tachycardia (not present → present) | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | SV Tachycardia (not present → present) | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Sinus Tachycardia (≥140 bpm & ↑ ≥15 bpm) | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Sinus Bradycardia (≤50 bpm and ↓ ≥15 bpm) | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Ventricular Tachycardia (not present → present) | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | SV Premature Beat (≥2per10sec & ↑ over BL) | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Ventricular Premature Beat(≥1per10sec & ↑ over BL) | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Atrial Fibrillation (not present → present) | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Atrial Flutter (not present → present) | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | 1° A-V Block (PR ≥ 0.20 sec and ↑ ≥ 0.05 sec) | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | 2° A-V block (not present → present) | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | 3° A-V block (not present → present) | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Left Bundle Branch Block (not present → present) | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Right Bundle Branch Block (not present → present) | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Pre-Excitation Syndrome (not present → present) | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Other ITV Block (QRS ≥ 0.10 sec & ↑ 0.02 sec) | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Old Infarction (not present-present at ≥12 weeks) | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Acute/Subacute Infarction (not present → present) | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Myocardial Ischemia (not present → present) | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | SYM T-Wave Inversion (not present → present) | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | QTcB interval (>475 msec & elevation 10% over BL) | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | QTcF interval (>475 msec & elevation 10% over BL) | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Other Abnormality | 3 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | 3° A-V block (not present → present) | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | SV Tachycardia (not present → present) | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | SYM T-Wave Inversion (not present → present) | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Left Bundle Branch Block (not present → present) | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Sinus Tachycardia (≥140 bpm & ↑ ≥15 bpm) | 2 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Right Bundle Branch Block (not present → present) | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Ventricular Premature Beat(≥1per10sec & ↑ over BL) | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Pre-Excitation Syndrome (not present → present) | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | QTcB interval (>475 msec & elevation 10% over BL) | 2 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Other ITV Block (QRS ≥ 0.10 sec & ↑ 0.02 sec) | 3 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | SV Premature Beat (≥2per10sec & ↑ over BL) | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Old Infarction (not present-present at ≥12 weeks) | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Acute/Subacute Infarction (not present → present) | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Sinus Bradycardia (≤50 bpm and ↓ ≥15 bpm) | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Atrial Fibrillation (not present → present) | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Ventricular Tachycardia (not present → present) | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Myocardial Ischemia (not present → present) | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Atrial Flutter (not present → present) | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Other Abnormality | 6 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | 1° A-V Block (PR ≥ 0.20 sec and ↑ ≥ 0.05 sec) | 1 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | 2° A-V block (not present → present) | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | QTcF interval (>475 msec & elevation 10% over BL) | 0 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Sinus Bradycardia (≤50 bpm and ↓ ≥15 bpm) | 0 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | 3° A-V block (not present → present) | 0 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | SYM T-Wave Inversion (not present → present) | 0 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Atrial Flutter (not present → present) | 0 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Acute/Subacute Infarction (not present → present) | 0 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Left Bundle Branch Block (not present → present) | 0 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Ventricular Premature Beat(≥1per10sec & ↑ over BL) | 0 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Sinus Tachycardia (≥140 bpm & ↑ ≥15 bpm) | 4 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Myocardial Ischemia (not present → present) | 0 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Right Bundle Branch Block (not present → present) | 0 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Ventricular Tachycardia (not present → present) | 0 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | QTcF interval (>475 msec & elevation 10% over BL) | 1 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Other Abnormality | 12 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Pre-Excitation Syndrome (not present → present) | 0 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | SV Premature Beat (≥2per10sec & ↑ over BL) | 0 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Atrial Fibrillation (not present → present) | 0 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | 2° A-V block (not present → present) | 0 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Other ITV Block (QRS ≥ 0.10 sec & ↑ 0.02 sec) | 3 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | 1° A-V Block (PR ≥ 0.20 sec and ↑ ≥ 0.05 sec) | 1 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | QTcB interval (>475 msec & elevation 10% over BL) | 3 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | SV Tachycardia (not present → present) | 0 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Eletrocardiograph (ECG) Abnormalities | Old Infarction (not present-present at ≥12 weeks) | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities
Abnormal chemistry criterion values include the following: aspartate aminotransferase ≥3x upper limit of normal (ULN); alanine aminotransferase ≥3x ULN; alkaline phosphatase ≥3x ULN; lactate dehydrogenase ≥3x ULN; creatinine ≥2.0 mg/dL; uric acid, ≥10.5 mg/dL (male), ≥8.5 mg/dL (female); bilirubin (Total) ≥2.0 mg/dL; serum prolactin \>ULN; creatine kinase ≥3x ULN; blood urea nitrogen ≥30 mg/dL; sodium ≤126 mEq/L or ≥156 mEq/L; potassium ≤2.5 mEq/L or ≥ 6.5 mEq/L; chloride ≤90 mEq/L or ≥118 mEq/L; calcium ≤8.2 mg/dL or ≥12 mg/dL
Time frame: At screening (up to 42 days prior to treatment start), Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Population: Safety Sample
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Blood Urea Nitrogen | 0 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Potassium, Serum | 0 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Alanine Aminotransferase | 3 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Aspartate Aminotransferase | 0 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Alkaline Phosphatase | 0 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Prolactin | 2 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Lactate Dehydrogenase | 0 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Creatinine | 0 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Uric Acid | 0 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Bilirubin, Total | 0 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Creatine Kinase | 2 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Sodium, Serum | 0 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Chloride, Serum | 0 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Calcium, Total | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Lactate Dehydrogenase | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Sodium, Serum | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Calcium, Total | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Bilirubin, Total | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Alkaline Phosphatase | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Blood Urea Nitrogen | 1 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Creatine Kinase | 4 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Aspartate Aminotransferase | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Chloride, Serum | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Creatinine | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Potassium, Serum | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Alanine Aminotransferase | 2 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Prolactin | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Uric Acid | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Creatinine | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Prolactin | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Calcium, Total | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Lactate Dehydrogenase | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Chloride, Serum | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Uric Acid | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Bilirubin, Total | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Creatine Kinase | 7 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Blood Urea Nitrogen | 1 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Sodium, Serum | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Alanine Aminotransferase | 5 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Aspartate Aminotransferase | 2 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Potassium, Serum | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Alkaline Phosphatase | 0 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Uric Acid | 0 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Aspartate Aminotransferase | 2 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Sodium, Serum | 0 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Creatinine | 0 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Alkaline Phosphatase | 0 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Alanine Aminotransferase | 10 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Potassium, Serum | 0 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Calcium, Total | 0 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Lactate Dehydrogenase | 0 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Creatine Kinase | 13 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Bilirubin, Total | 0 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Prolactin | 2 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Blood Urea Nitrogen | 2 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Chemistry Abnormalities | Chloride, Serum | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology Abnormalities
Abnormal hematology criterion values include the following: hematocrit (ages 6-17, males & females) ≤33%; hemoglobin (ages 6-17, males & females) \<11.3 g/dL; leukocytes ≤2800 c/mm3 or ≥16000 c/mm3; eosinophils (ages 6-17, males & females) \>17%; neutrophils \<15%; platelet count ≤75,000 c/mm3 or ≥700,000 c/mm3
Time frame: At screening (up to 42 days prior to treatment start), Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Population: Safety Sample
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology Abnormalities | Eosinophils, relative | 0 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology Abnormalities | Neutrophils, relative | 1 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology Abnormalities | Hemoglobin | 0 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology Abnormalities | Leukocytes | 2 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology Abnormalities | Platelet Count | 0 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology Abnormalities | Hematocrit | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology Abnormalities | Hemoglobin | 2 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology Abnormalities | Hematocrit | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology Abnormalities | Leukocytes | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology Abnormalities | Eosinophils, relative | 1 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology Abnormalities | Neutrophils, relative | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology Abnormalities | Platelet Count | 1 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology Abnormalities | Hematocrit | 2 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology Abnormalities | Hemoglobin | 3 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology Abnormalities | Eosinophils, relative | 3 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology Abnormalities | Platelet Count | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology Abnormalities | Neutrophils, relative | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology Abnormalities | Leukocytes | 3 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology Abnormalities | Neutrophils, relative | 1 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology Abnormalities | Hematocrit | 2 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology Abnormalities | Hemoglobin | 5 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology Abnormalities | Leukocytes | 5 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology Abnormalities | Platelet Count | 1 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Hematology Abnormalities | Eosinophils, relative | 4 Participants |
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities
Abnormal metabolic criterion values include the following: fasting serum glucose ≥115 mg/dL; non-fasting serum glucose ≥ 200 mg/dL; total cholesterol ≥240 mg/dL; LDL cholesterol ≥160 mg/dL; HDL cholesterol ≤30 mg/dL; triglycerides ≥120 mg/dL (females), ≥160 mg/dL (males)
Time frame: At screening (up to 42 days prior to treatment start), Week 8, Week 26, Week 52
Population: Safety Sample
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Cholesterol, Total Non-Fasting | 0 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Glucose, Fasting Serum | 1 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Glucose, Serum | 0 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Cholesterol, HDL Fasting | 4 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Cholesterol, HDL Non-Fasting | 4 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Cholesterol, HDL Random | 7 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Cholesterol, LDL Fasting | 0 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Cholesterol, LDL Non-Fasting | 0 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Cholesterol, LDL Random | 0 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Cholesterol, Total Fasting | 1 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Cholesterol, Total Random | 1 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Triglycerides, Fasting | 10 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Triglycerides, Non-Fasting | 15 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Triglycerides, Random | 22 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Cholesterol, HDL Random | 6 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Triglycerides, Fasting | 8 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Cholesterol, HDL Non-Fasting | 3 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Cholesterol, LDL Random | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Glucose, Serum | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Cholesterol, Total Random | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Cholesterol, Total Non-Fasting | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Cholesterol, Total Fasting | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Cholesterol, HDL Fasting | 3 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Cholesterol, LDL Fasting | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Triglycerides, Random | 20 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Glucose, Fasting Serum | 1 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Triglycerides, Non-Fasting | 12 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Cholesterol, LDL Non-Fasting | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Glucose, Serum | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Cholesterol, HDL Non-Fasting | 10 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Cholesterol, HDL Random | 16 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Triglycerides, Random | 47 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Cholesterol, LDL Fasting | 2 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Cholesterol, LDL Non-Fasting | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Triglycerides, Non-Fasting | 33 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Cholesterol, LDL Random | 2 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Cholesterol, Total Fasting | 1 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Cholesterol, Total Non-Fasting | 1 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Cholesterol, Total Random | 2 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Glucose, Fasting Serum | 5 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Triglycerides, Fasting | 20 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Cholesterol, HDL Fasting | 7 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Cholesterol, LDL Random | 2 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Cholesterol, LDL Non-Fasting | 0 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Triglycerides, Fasting | 38 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Cholesterol, LDL Fasting | 2 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Cholesterol, HDL Non-Fasting | 17 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Glucose, Fasting Serum | 7 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Cholesterol, Total Random | 3 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Cholesterol, HDL Random | 29 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Cholesterol, HDL Fasting | 14 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Cholesterol, Total Fasting | 2 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Triglycerides, Non-Fasting | 60 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Glucose, Serum | 0 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Cholesterol, Total Non-Fasting | 1 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Metabolic Abnormalities | Triglycerides, Random | 89 Participants |
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Deaths, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, Extra Pyramidal Syndrome (EPS)-Related AEs
Participants with Adverse Events (AEs), Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), and AEs leading to study discontinuation. AE is defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition. SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a cancer, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, results in the development of drug dependency or drug abuse, is an important medical event.
Time frame: From Screening (up to 42 days prior to treatment start) through Week 52 (end of study) for SAEs; from Week 0 (Baseline) through Week 52 (End of Study) for AEs
Population: Safety Population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Deaths, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, Extra Pyramidal Syndrome (EPS)-Related AEs | Treatment-Emergent AEs | 75 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Deaths, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, Extra Pyramidal Syndrome (EPS)-Related AEs | Deaths | 0 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Deaths, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, Extra Pyramidal Syndrome (EPS)-Related AEs | Treatment-Emergent AEs Leading to Discontinuation | 9 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Deaths, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, Extra Pyramidal Syndrome (EPS)-Related AEs | Treatment-Emergent SAEs | 3 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Deaths, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, Extra Pyramidal Syndrome (EPS)-Related AEs | Treatment-Emergent EPS-Related AEs | 16 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Deaths, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, Extra Pyramidal Syndrome (EPS)-Related AEs | Treatment-Emergent AEs | 63 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Deaths, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, Extra Pyramidal Syndrome (EPS)-Related AEs | Treatment-Emergent EPS-Related AEs | 6 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Deaths, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, Extra Pyramidal Syndrome (EPS)-Related AEs | Treatment-Emergent AEs Leading to Discontinuation | 10 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Deaths, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, Extra Pyramidal Syndrome (EPS)-Related AEs | Treatment-Emergent SAEs | 1 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Deaths, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, Extra Pyramidal Syndrome (EPS)-Related AEs | Deaths | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Deaths, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, Extra Pyramidal Syndrome (EPS)-Related AEs | Treatment-Emergent EPS-Related AEs | 26 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Deaths, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, Extra Pyramidal Syndrome (EPS)-Related AEs | Deaths | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Deaths, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, Extra Pyramidal Syndrome (EPS)-Related AEs | Treatment-Emergent SAEs | 5 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Deaths, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, Extra Pyramidal Syndrome (EPS)-Related AEs | Treatment-Emergent AEs | 148 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Deaths, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, Extra Pyramidal Syndrome (EPS)-Related AEs | Treatment-Emergent AEs Leading to Discontinuation | 14 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Deaths, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, Extra Pyramidal Syndrome (EPS)-Related AEs | Deaths | 0 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Deaths, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, Extra Pyramidal Syndrome (EPS)-Related AEs | Treatment-Emergent AEs Leading to Discontinuation | 33 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Deaths, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, Extra Pyramidal Syndrome (EPS)-Related AEs | Treatment-Emergent SAEs | 9 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Deaths, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, Extra Pyramidal Syndrome (EPS)-Related AEs | Treatment-Emergent EPS-Related AEs | 48 Participants |
| Total | Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Deaths, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, Extra Pyramidal Syndrome (EPS)-Related AEs | Treatment-Emergent AEs | 286 Participants |
Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities
Clinically significantly abnormal vital signs met age-appropriate (heart rate cohorts: ages 5-14 & ages 15+; blood pressure cohorts: ages 6-12 & ages 13-17) criterion AND represented change from pretreatment value of at least the following magnitudes: systolic blood pressure (≥130 mmHg & ≥144 mmHg w/ increase of ≥20 mmHg) or (≤117 mmHg & ≤120 mmHg w/ decrease of ≥20 mmHg); diastolic blood pressure (≥86 mmHg & ≥92 mmHg w/ increase of ≥15 mmHg) or (≤75 mm Hg & ≤80 mmHg w/ decrease of ≥15 mmHg); heart rate (140 bpm and 120 bpm w/ increase of ≥15 bpm) or (50 bpm and 50 bpm w/ decrease of ≥15 bpm).
Time frame: At screening (up to 42 days prior to treatment start), Week 0 (Baseline), Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 14, Week 20, Week 26, Week 34, Week 42, Week 52 (Endpoint)
Population: Safety Sample
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| De Novo | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Sitting Heart Rate Decrease | 0 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Supine Heart Rate Decrease | 0 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure Decrease | 14 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Sitting Heart Rate Increase | 1 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure Decrease | 11 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Supine Heart Rate Increase | 1 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure Increase | 3 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Standing Systolic Blood Pressure Increase | 6 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Supine Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase | 6 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Standing Diastolic Blood Pressure Decrease | 22 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase | 2 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Standing Heart Rate Decrease | 0 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Supine Diastolic Blood Pressure Decrease | 15 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Standing Systolic Blood Pressure Decrease | 16 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Supine Systolic Blood Pressure Decrease | 14 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Standing Heart Rate Increase | 5 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Standing Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase | 3 Participants |
| De Novo | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Supine Systolic Blood Pressure Increase | 5 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Standing Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase | 8 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Standing Diastolic Blood Pressure Decrease | 20 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Supine Heart Rate Decrease | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase | 2 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure Decrease | 8 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Standing Systolic Blood Pressure Increase | 7 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Supine Heart Rate Increase | 1 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Standing Systolic Blood Pressure Decrease | 22 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Sitting Heart Rate Increase | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure Increase | 1 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Supine Systolic Blood Pressure Increase | 2 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure Decrease | 8 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Standing Heart Rate Decrease | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Supine Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase | 5 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Sitting Heart Rate Decrease | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Supine Diastolic Blood Pressure Decrease | 19 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Standing Heart Rate Increase | 3 Participants |
| Rollover Placebo | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Supine Systolic Blood Pressure Decrease | 15 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Standing Heart Rate Decrease | 1 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Supine Systolic Blood Pressure Increase | 18 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Supine Systolic Blood Pressure Decrease | 27 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Standing Systolic Blood Pressure Increase | 13 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Standing Systolic Blood Pressure Decrease | 25 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure Increase | 6 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure Decrease | 13 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Supine Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase | 11 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Supine Diastolic Blood Pressure Decrease | 38 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Standing Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase | 17 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Standing Diastolic Blood Pressure Decrease | 36 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase | 1 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure Decrease | 9 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Supine Heart Rate Increase | 2 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Supine Heart Rate Decrease | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Standing Heart Rate Increase | 4 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Sitting Heart Rate Increase | 1 Participants |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Sitting Heart Rate Decrease | 0 Participants |
| Total | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Supine Systolic Blood Pressure Decrease | 56 Participants |
| Total | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Supine Heart Rate Decrease | 0 Participants |
| Total | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Standing Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase | 28 Participants |
| Total | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Supine Diastolic Blood Pressure Decrease | 72 Participants |
| Total | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Supine Systolic Blood Pressure Increase | 25 Participants |
| Total | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Standing Heart Rate Increase | 12 Participants |
| Total | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Supine Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase | 22 Participants |
| Total | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure Decrease | 32 Participants |
| Total | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Standing Systolic Blood Pressure Increase | 26 Participants |
| Total | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Standing Heart Rate Decrease | 1 Participants |
| Total | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure Increase | 10 Participants |
| Total | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Standing Systolic Blood Pressure Decrease | 63 Participants |
| Total | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Sitting Heart Rate Decrease | 0 Participants |
| Total | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure Decrease | 31 Participants |
| Total | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Sitting Heart Rate Increase | 2 Participants |
| Total | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Supine Heart Rate Increase | 4 Participants |
| Total | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase | 5 Participants |
| Total | Number of Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities | Standing Diastolic Blood Pressure Decrease | 78 Participants |
CGI-Improvement Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)
CGI scale is a global evaluation of improvement over time. CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) is a clinician rated assessment that evaluates improvement relative to symptoms at baseline on a a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). CGI-I Score is from 1 to 7. A lower score signifies larger improvement.
Time frame: Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)
Population: Efficacy Sample. The Efficacy Sample includes all patients that had a baseline and at least one post-baseline measurement of the same scale. A total of 322 patients met this criterion based on CGI-S evaluations.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| De Novo | CGI-Improvement Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | 2.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.3 |
| Rollover Placebo | CGI-Improvement Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | 2.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.24 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | CGI-Improvement Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | 2.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.2 |
| Total | CGI-Improvement Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | 2.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.23 |
Change From Baseline in ABC Stereotypy Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)
The ABC is an informant-based symptom checklist for assessing and classifying problem behaviors of children and adolescents with mental retardation. The 58 items are rated on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all a problem to 3 = the problem is severe in degree), and resolve into 5 subscales: (1) irritability and agitation; (2) lethargy and social withdrawal; (3) stereotypic behavior; (4) hyperactivity and noncompliance, and (5) inappropriate speech. ABC Stereotypy Subscale Score is from 0 to 21. A negative change score signifies improvement.
Time frame: Week 0 (Baseline), Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)
Population: Efficacy Sample, LOCF. The Efficacy Sample includes all patients that had a baseline and at least one post-baseline measurement of the same scale. A total of 322 patients met this criterion based on CGI-S evaluations. Of those, 8 patients had baseline ABC (all subscales) evaluations but no post-baseline.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| De Novo | Change From Baseline in ABC Stereotypy Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Baseline | 8.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.18 |
| De Novo | Change From Baseline in ABC Stereotypy Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Change at Endpoint (LOCF) | -2.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.67 |
| Rollover Placebo | Change From Baseline in ABC Stereotypy Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Change at Endpoint (LOCF) | -1.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.46 |
| Rollover Placebo | Change From Baseline in ABC Stereotypy Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Baseline | 8.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.57 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Change From Baseline in ABC Stereotypy Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Baseline | 6.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.46 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Change From Baseline in ABC Stereotypy Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Change at Endpoint (LOCF) | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.58 |
| Total | Change From Baseline in ABC Stereotypy Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Baseline | 7.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.46 |
| Total | Change From Baseline in ABC Stereotypy Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Change at Endpoint (LOCF) | -1.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.71 |
Change From Baseline in Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS) Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)
CY-BOCS is a 10-item, clinician-rated scale designed to measure the severity of obsessive-compulsive symptoms in patients below the age of 18. The scale contains 5 items pertaining to obsessions (which were not used in this trial) and 5 items pertaining to compulsions, which rated each symptom domain in terms of time spent, interference with functioning, distress, resistance, and control. Each item was rated on a 5-point scale, from 0 (no symptoms or minimum severity) to 4 (extreme symptoms or maximum severity). CY-BOCS Score is from 0 to 20. A negative change score signifies improvement.
Time frame: Week 0 (Baseline), Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)
Population: Efficacy Sample, LOCF. The Efficacy Sample includes all patients that had a baseline and at least one post-baseline measurement of the same scale. A total of 322 patients met this criterion based on CGI-S evaluations. Of those, 96 patients did not have post-baseline evaluations for CY-BOCS, and were excluded from the efficacy analyses.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| De Novo | Change From Baseline in Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS) Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Baseline | 12.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.6 |
| De Novo | Change From Baseline in Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS) Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Change at Endpoint (LOCF) | -2.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.68 |
| Rollover Placebo | Change From Baseline in Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS) Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Change at Endpoint (LOCF) | -2.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.06 |
| Rollover Placebo | Change From Baseline in Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS) Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Baseline | 12.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.96 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Change From Baseline in Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS) Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Baseline | 10.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.87 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Change From Baseline in Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS) Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Change at Endpoint (LOCF) | 0.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.81 |
| Total | Change From Baseline in Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS) Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Baseline | 11.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.2 |
| Total | Change From Baseline in Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS) Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Change at Endpoint (LOCF) | -0.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.23 |
Mean Change From Baseline in ABC Hyperactivity Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)
The ABC is an informant-based symptom checklist for assessing and classifying problem behaviors of children and adolescents with mental retardation. The 58 items are rated on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all a problem to 3 = the problem is severe in degree), and resolve into 5 subscales: (1) irritability and agitation; (2) lethargy and social withdrawal; (3) stereotypic behavior; (4) hyperactivity and noncompliance, and (5) inappropriate speech. ABC Hyperactivity Subscale Score is from 0 to 48. A negative change score signifies improvement.
Time frame: Week 0 (Baseline), Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)
Population: Efficacy Sample, LOCF.The Efficacy Sample includes all patients that had a baseline and at least one post-baseline measurement of the same scale. A total of 322 patients met this criterion based on CGI-S evaluations. Of those, 8 patients had baseline ABC (all subscales) evaluations but no post-baseline.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| De Novo | Mean Change From Baseline in ABC Hyperactivity Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Baseline | 28.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.87 |
| De Novo | Mean Change From Baseline in ABC Hyperactivity Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Change at Endpoint (LOCF) | -10.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.55 |
| Rollover Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in ABC Hyperactivity Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Change at Endpoint (LOCF) | -8.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.85 |
| Rollover Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in ABC Hyperactivity Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Baseline | 25.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.18 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline in ABC Hyperactivity Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Baseline | 18.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.03 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline in ABC Hyperactivity Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Change at Endpoint (LOCF) | 0.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.18 |
| Total | Mean Change From Baseline in ABC Hyperactivity Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Baseline | 22.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.79 |
| Total | Mean Change From Baseline in ABC Hyperactivity Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Change at Endpoint (LOCF) | -4.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.92 |
Mean Change From Baseline in ABC Inappropriate Speech Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)
The ABC is an informant-based symptom checklist for assessing and classifying problem behaviors of children and adolescents with mental retardation. The 58 items are rated on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all a problem to 3 = the problem is severe in degree), and resolve into 5 subscales: (1) irritability and agitation; (2) lethargy and social withdrawal; (3) stereotypic behavior; (4) hyperactivity and noncompliance, and (5) inappropriate speech. ABC Inappropriate Speech Subscale score is from 1 to 12. A negative change score signifies improvement.
Time frame: Week 0 (Baseline), Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)
Population: Efficacy Sample, LOCF
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| De Novo | Mean Change From Baseline in ABC Inappropriate Speech Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Baseline | 5.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.15 |
| De Novo | Mean Change From Baseline in ABC Inappropriate Speech Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Change at Endpoint (LOCF) | -1.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.66 |
| Rollover Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in ABC Inappropriate Speech Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Change at Endpoint (LOCF) | -1.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.94 |
| Rollover Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in ABC Inappropriate Speech Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Baseline | 5.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.23 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline in ABC Inappropriate Speech Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Baseline | 4.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.61 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline in ABC Inappropriate Speech Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Change at Endpoint (LOCF) | -0.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.5 |
| Total | Mean Change From Baseline in ABC Inappropriate Speech Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Baseline | 4.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.72 |
| Total | Mean Change From Baseline in ABC Inappropriate Speech Subscale Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Change at Endpoint (LOCF) | -1.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.75 |
Mean Change From Baseline in ABC Social Withdrawal Scale At Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)
The ABC is an informant-based symptom checklist for assessing and classifying problem behaviors of children and adolescents with mental retardation. The 58 items are rated on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all a problem to 3 = the problem is severe in degree), and resolve into 5 subscales: (1) irritability and agitation; (2) lethargy and social withdrawal; (3) stereotypic behavior; (4) hyperactivity and noncompliance, and (5) inappropriate speech. ABC Social Withdrawal Subscale Score is from 0 to 48. A negative change score signifies improvement.
Time frame: Week 0 (Baseline), Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)
Population: Efficacy Sample, LOCF. The Efficacy Sample includes all patients that had a baseline and at least one post-baseline measurement of the same scale. A total of 322 patients met this criterion based on CGI-S evaluations. Of those, 8 patients had baseline ABC (all subscales) evaluations but no post-baseline.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| De Novo | Mean Change From Baseline in ABC Social Withdrawal Scale At Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Change at Endpoint (LOCF) | -5.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.07 |
| De Novo | Mean Change From Baseline in ABC Social Withdrawal Scale At Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Baseline | 14.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.62 |
| Rollover Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in ABC Social Withdrawal Scale At Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Baseline | 11.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.24 |
| Rollover Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in ABC Social Withdrawal Scale At Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Change at Endpoint (LOCF) | -3.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.96 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline in ABC Social Withdrawal Scale At Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Change at Endpoint (LOCF) | -1.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.09 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline in ABC Social Withdrawal Scale At Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Baseline | 10.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.86 |
| Total | Mean Change From Baseline in ABC Social Withdrawal Scale At Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Change at Endpoint (LOCF) | -3.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.28 |
| Total | Mean Change From Baseline in ABC Social Withdrawal Scale At Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Baseline | 11.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.03 |
Mean Change From Baseline in Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) Irritability Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)
The ABC is an informant-based symptom checklist for assessing and classifying problem behaviors of children and adolescents with mental retardation. The 58 items are rated on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all a problem to 3 = the problem is severe in degree), and resolve into 5 subscales: (1) irritability and agitation; (2) lethargy and social withdrawal; (3) stereotypic behavior; (4) hyperactivity and noncompliance, and (5) inappropriate speech. ABC Irritability Subscale Score is from 0 to 45. A negative change signifies improvement
Time frame: Week 0 (Baseline), Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)
Population: Efficacy Sample, LOCF. The Efficacy Sample includes all patients that had a baseline and at least one post-baseline measurement of the same scale. A total of 322 patients met this criterion based on CGI-S evaluations. Of those, 8 patients had baseline ABC (all subscales) evaluations but no post-baseline.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| De Novo | Mean Change From Baseline in Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) Irritability Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Baseline | 23.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.88 |
| De Novo | Mean Change From Baseline in Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) Irritability Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Change at Endpoint (LOCF) | -6.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.12 |
| Rollover Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) Irritability Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Change at Endpoint (LOCF) | -6.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.25 |
| Rollover Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) Irritability Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Baseline | 21.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.82 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline in Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) Irritability Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Baseline | 15.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.2 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline in Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) Irritability Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Change at Endpoint (LOCF) | 0.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.72 |
| Total | Mean Change From Baseline in Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) Irritability Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Baseline | 18.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.96 |
| Total | Mean Change From Baseline in Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) Irritability Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Change at Endpoint (LOCF) | -2.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.98 |
Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression (CGI)-Severity Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)
CGI scale is a global evaluation of improvement over time. CGI-Severity (CGI-S) is a clinician-rated assessment that evaluates the severity of a patient's condition on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (no symptoms) to 7 (very severe symptoms). CGI-Severity score is from 1 to 7. A negative change score signifies improvement.
Time frame: Week 0 (Baseline), Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF)
Population: Efficacy Sample, LOCF. The Efficacy Sample includes all patients that had a baseline and at least one post-baseline measurement of the same scale. A total of 322 patients met this criterion based on CGI-S evaluations.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| De Novo | Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression (CGI)-Severity Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Baseline | 4.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.99 |
| De Novo | Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression (CGI)-Severity Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Change at Endpoint (LOCF) | -0.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.85 |
| Rollover Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression (CGI)-Severity Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Change at Endpoint (LOCF) | -0.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.06 |
| Rollover Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression (CGI)-Severity Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Baseline | 4.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.99 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression (CGI)-Severity Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Baseline | 3.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.05 |
| Rollover Aripiprazole | Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression (CGI)-Severity Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Change at Endpoint (LOCF) | -0.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.01 |
| Total | Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression (CGI)-Severity Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Baseline | 4.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.08 |
| Total | Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression (CGI)-Severity Score at Week 52 (Endpoint, LOCF) | Change at Endpoint (LOCF) | -0.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.04 |