Skip to content

A Study of Subcutaneous (sc) Mircera in Dialysis Patients With Chronic Renal Anemia.

An Open-label, Multicenter, Randomized Study to Determine Dose Conversion Factors at Different Frequencies of Administration After Switching From Maintenance Treatment With Subcutaneous Epoetin Alfa or Beta to Maintenance Treatment With Subcutaneous RO0503821 in Dialysis Patients With Chronic Renal Anemia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00364832
Enrollment
137
Registered
2006-08-16
Start date
2001-10-31
Completion date
2005-07-31
Last updated
2016-12-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anemia

Brief summary

This study will determine the appropriate dose and frequency of administration of sc Mircera maintenance therapy in dialysis patients with chronic renal anemia who were previously receiving sc epoetin alfa or beta. The anticipated time on study treatment is 3-12 months and the target sample size is 100-500 individuals.

Interventions

DRUGmethoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta [Mircera]

Differing doses and frequencies of sc administration

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* adult patients \>=18 years of age; * chronic renal anemia; * on dialysis (hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis) therapy for at least 3 months; * receiving sc epoetin alfa or beta for at least 3 months prior to the run-in period.

Exclusion criteria

* women who are pregnant, breastfeeding or using unreliable birth control methods; * use of any investigational drug within 30 days preceding the run-in phase, or during the run-in or study treatment period.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Median Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Levels to End of Initial Treatment Under Constant Dosing RegimenFrom Baseline (Day -28 to Day 1) to EOIT (Week 19 or Week 21)Median change from Baseline in hemoglobin (Hb) levels to end of initial treatment (EOIT) under constant dosing regimen was reported. For ease of interpretation, all individual slope values were multiplied by 42 to give an estimate of change in Hb values over six weeks. Baseline (Day -28 to Day 1) Hb values was calculated as the mean of the screening assessment (SA) and run-in period (Week -2 and -1). For all participants, an EOIT value was calculated as the last observed Hb value before a dose change or blood transfusion. For participants without any dose adjustments or blood transfusion, the EOIT value was identical to the Week 19 (or Week 21) value.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Median Change From Baseline in Hematocrit Levels to End of Initial Treatment Under Constant Dosing RegimenFrom Baseline (Day -28 to Day 1) to EOIT (Week 19 or Week 21)Median change from Baseline in hematocrit (Hct) levels to end of initial treatment under constant dosing regimen was reported. Baseline (Day -28 to Day 1) Hct values was calculated as the mean of the SA and run-in period (Weeks -2 and -1). For all participants, an EOIT value was calculated as the last observed Hct value before a dose change or blood transfusion. For participants without any dose adjustments or blood transfusion, the EOIT value was identical to the Week 19 (or Week 21) value.
Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure Before and After DialysisFrom Baseline (Day -28 to Day 1) to Week 126Mean Change from Baseline in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) is calculated as the end of treatment values minus the Baseline value. Baseline (Day -28 to Day 1) value is the measurements taken at screening assessment and run-in period (Weeks -2 and -1).
Mean Change in Pulse RateUp to Week 126Mean change in pulse rate was reported.
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesUp to Week 126Participants with marked laboratory abnormalities were reported. Marked abnormality criteria: Serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT); high \>25 units per litre (U/L), albumin (low \< 31 grams per litre \[g/L\]), total protein (\< 60 g/L), phosphate (high \>1.45 millimoles per litre \[mmol/L\]); Low \<0.84 mmol/L), potassium (high \>5 mmol/L; Low \<3.5 mmol/L), platelets (low:\<150×10\^9/L), White blood cells (\[WBCs\]); high: 10.8×10\^9/L and Low:4.3×10\^9/L), basophils (high:\>0.15×10\^9/L), eosinophils (high:\>0.70×10\^9/L), lymphocytes (low:\<1.50×10\^9/L), and neutrophils (low:\<1.83×10\^9/L).
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events, Any Serious Adverse Events, And DeathsUp to Week 126An Adverse Events (AEs) is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is a significant medical event in the investigator's judgment or requires intervention to prevent one or other of these outcomes. The study design tested 3 different starting dose conversion factors at 3 different dosing schedules during the core study period. As study drug doses can be modified continually over time all results for the two long term safety periods were displayed by dose schedule group only.

Countries

Germany, Italy, Spain, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 137 participants were enrolled in this study conducted from 15 October 2001 to 7 July 2003 (core study period) and 19 September 2002 to 7 July 2005 (extension study period) at 22 centers (8 in Italy, 6 in the US, 4 in Germany, and 4 in Spain).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cohort A (0.4/150, 1x/ Week)
Eligible participants were administered RO0503821 SC using a dose conversion factor of 0.4/150 mcg/kg of the previous weekly ESA dose, (equal to 50% assumed equi-effective dose) once weekly up to 19 weeks. After 19 weeks of core treatment period, participants were followed-up for two optional treatment extension periods (54 weeks each).
16
Cohort B (0.4/150, 1x/ 3 Weeks)
Eligible participants were administered RO0503821 SC using a dose conversion factor of 0.4/150 mcg/kg of the previous weekly ESA dose, (equal to 50% assumed equi-effective dose) once every three weeks up to 19 weeks. After 19 weeks of core treatment period, participants were followed-up for two optional treatment extension periods (54 weeks each).
15
Cohort C (0.4/150, 1x/ 4 Weeks)
Eligible participants were administered RO0503821 SC using a dose conversion factor of 0.4/150 mcg/kg of the previous weekly ESA dose, (equal to 50% assumed equi-effective dose) once every four weeks up to 21 weeks. After 21 weeks of core treatment period, participants were followed-up for two optional treatment extension periods (54 weeks each).
15
Cohort D (0.8/150, 1x/ Week)
Eligible participants were administered RO0503821 SC using a dose conversion factor of 0.8/150 mcg/kg of the previous weekly ESA dose, (equal to 100% assumed equi-effective dose) once weekly up to 19 weeks. After 19 weeks of core treatment period, participants were followed-up for two optional treatment extension periods (54 weeks each).
16
Cohort E (0.8/150, 1x/ 3 Weeks)
Eligible participants were administered RO0503821 SC using a dose conversion factor of 0.8/150 mcg/kg of the previous weekly ESA dose, (equal to 100% assumed equi-effective dose) once every three weeks up to 19 weeks. After 19 weeks of core treatment period, participants were followed-up for two optional treatment extension periods (54 weeks each).
16
Cohort F (0.8/150, 1x/ 4 Weeks)
Eligible participants were administered RO0503821 SC using a dose conversion factor of 0.8/150 mcg/kg of the previous weekly ESA dose, (equal to 100% assumed equi-effective dose) once every four weeks up to 21 weeks. After 21 weeks of core treatment period, participants were followed-up for two optional treatment extension periods (54 weeks each).
12
Cohort G (1.2/150, 1x/ Week)
Eligible participants were administered RO0503821 SC using a dose conversion factor of 1.2/150 mcg/kg of the previous weekly ESA dose, (equal to 150% assumed equi-effective dose) once weekly up to 19 weeks. After 19 weeks of core treatment period, participants were followed-up for two optional treatment extension periods (54 weeks each).
16
Cohort H (1.2/150, 1x/ 3 Weeks)
Eligible participants were administered RO0503821 SC using a dose conversion factor of 1.2/150 mcg/kg of the previous weekly ESA dose, (equal to 150% assumed equi-effective dose) once every three weeks up to 19 weeks. After 19 weeks of core treatment period, participants were followed-up for two optional treatment extension periods (54 weeks each).
15
Cohort I (1.2/150, 1x/ 4 Weeks)
Eligible participants were administered RO0503821 SC using a dose conversion factor of 1.2/150 mcg/kg of the previous weekly ESA dose, (equal to 150% assumed equi-effective dose) once every four weeks up to 21 weeks. After 21 weeks of core treatment period, participants were followed-up for two optional treatment extension periods (54 weeks each).
16
Total137

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006FG007FG008FG009FG010FG011
Core PeriodEarly Withdrawals221100410000
Extension Year 1Early Withdrawals0000000004210
Extension Year 2Early Withdrawals000000000553

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCohort A (0.4/150, 1x/ Week)Cohort B (0.4/150, 1x/ 3 Weeks)Cohort C (0.4/150, 1x/ 4 Weeks)Cohort D (0.8/150, 1x/ Week)Cohort E (0.8/150, 1x/ 3 Weeks)Cohort F (0.8/150, 1x/ 4 Weeks)Cohort G (1.2/150, 1x/ Week)Cohort H (1.2/150, 1x/ 3 Weeks)Cohort I (1.2/150, 1x/ 4 Weeks)Total
Age, Continuous67.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.03
65.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.29
64.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.28
61.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.51
64.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.83
67.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3
62.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.74
58.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.12
64.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.34
63.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.63
Gender
Female
5 Participants8 Participants5 Participants6 Participants5 Participants7 Participants4 Participants5 Participants7 Participants52 Participants
Gender
Male
11 Participants7 Participants10 Participants10 Participants11 Participants5 Participants12 Participants10 Participants9 Participants85 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
36 / 4830 / 4639 / 43
serious
Total, serious adverse events
15 / 4813 / 4620 / 43

Outcome results

Primary

Median Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Levels to End of Initial Treatment Under Constant Dosing Regimen

Median change from Baseline in hemoglobin (Hb) levels to end of initial treatment (EOIT) under constant dosing regimen was reported. For ease of interpretation, all individual slope values were multiplied by 42 to give an estimate of change in Hb values over six weeks. Baseline (Day -28 to Day 1) Hb values was calculated as the mean of the screening assessment (SA) and run-in period (Week -2 and -1). For all participants, an EOIT value was calculated as the last observed Hb value before a dose change or blood transfusion. For participants without any dose adjustments or blood transfusion, the EOIT value was identical to the Week 19 (or Week 21) value.

Time frame: From Baseline (Day -28 to Day 1) to EOIT (Week 19 or Week 21)

Population: The ITT population was considered for analysis which included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort A (0.4/150, 1x/ Week)Median Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Levels to End of Initial Treatment Under Constant Dosing Regimen-0.80 gram per deciliter
Cohort B (0.4/150, 1x/ 3 Weeks)Median Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Levels to End of Initial Treatment Under Constant Dosing Regimen-0.60 gram per deciliter
Cohort C (0.4/150, 1x/ 4 Weeks)Median Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Levels to End of Initial Treatment Under Constant Dosing Regimen-0.29 gram per deciliter
Cohort D (0.8/150, 1x/ Week)Median Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Levels to End of Initial Treatment Under Constant Dosing Regimen0.02 gram per deciliter
Cohort E (0.8/150, 1x/ 3 Weeks)Median Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Levels to End of Initial Treatment Under Constant Dosing Regimen-0.14 gram per deciliter
Cohort F (0.8/150, 1x/ 4 Weeks)Median Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Levels to End of Initial Treatment Under Constant Dosing Regimen-0.28 gram per deciliter
Cohort G (1.2/150, 1x/ Week)Median Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Levels to End of Initial Treatment Under Constant Dosing Regimen0.65 gram per deciliter
Cohort H (1.2/150, 1x/ 3 Weeks)Median Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Levels to End of Initial Treatment Under Constant Dosing Regimen0.33 gram per deciliter
Cohort I (1.2/150, 1x/ 4 Weeks)Median Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Levels to End of Initial Treatment Under Constant Dosing Regimen0.22 gram per deciliter
Comparison: All cohorts with dosing frequency 1x/ week (0.4, 0.8 and 1.2 dose group)90% CI: [0.73, 0.9]
Comparison: All cohorts with dosing frequency 1x/ 3 weeks (0.4, 0.8 and 1.2 dose group)90% CI: [0.55, 0.86]
Comparison: All cohorts with dosing frequency 1x/ 4 weeks (0.4, 0.8 and 1.2 dose group)90% CI: [0.81, 1.09]
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure Before and After Dialysis

Mean Change from Baseline in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) is calculated as the end of treatment values minus the Baseline value. Baseline (Day -28 to Day 1) value is the measurements taken at screening assessment and run-in period (Weeks -2 and -1).

Time frame: From Baseline (Day -28 to Day 1) to Week 126

Population: The safety population was considered for analysis which included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A (0.4/150, 1x/ Week)Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure Before and After DialysisSBP before dialysis-1 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 25.5
Cohort A (0.4/150, 1x/ Week)Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure Before and After DialysisDBP after dialysis-3 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 14.6
Cohort A (0.4/150, 1x/ Week)Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure Before and After DialysisDBP before dialysis-1 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 14.2
Cohort A (0.4/150, 1x/ Week)Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure Before and After DialysisSBP after dialysis0 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 24.4
Cohort B (0.4/150, 1x/ 3 Weeks)Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure Before and After DialysisDBP after dialysis4 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 10.4
Cohort B (0.4/150, 1x/ 3 Weeks)Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure Before and After DialysisSBP before dialysis7 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 15.5
Cohort B (0.4/150, 1x/ 3 Weeks)Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure Before and After DialysisSBP after dialysis10 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 34.3
Cohort B (0.4/150, 1x/ 3 Weeks)Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure Before and After DialysisDBP before dialysis1 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 9
Cohort C (0.4/150, 1x/ 4 Weeks)Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure Before and After DialysisDBP before dialysis3 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 12.5
Cohort C (0.4/150, 1x/ 4 Weeks)Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure Before and After DialysisDBP after dialysis-1 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 12.9
Cohort C (0.4/150, 1x/ 4 Weeks)Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure Before and After DialysisSBP after dialysis1 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 26.9
Cohort C (0.4/150, 1x/ 4 Weeks)Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure Before and After DialysisSBP before dialysis2 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 30.4
Cohort D (0.8/150, 1x/ Week)Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure Before and After DialysisSBP before dialysis-8 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 18.1
Cohort D (0.8/150, 1x/ Week)Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure Before and After DialysisSBP after dialysis-4 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 25.2
Cohort D (0.8/150, 1x/ Week)Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure Before and After DialysisDBP after dialysis-3 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 15.8
Cohort D (0.8/150, 1x/ Week)Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure Before and After DialysisDBP before dialysis-3 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 11.4
Cohort E (0.8/150, 1x/ 3 Weeks)Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure Before and After DialysisSBP before dialysis-4 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 10.8
Cohort E (0.8/150, 1x/ 3 Weeks)Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure Before and After DialysisDBP after dialysis0 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 11.1
Cohort E (0.8/150, 1x/ 3 Weeks)Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure Before and After DialysisSBP after dialysis7 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 17.1
Cohort E (0.8/150, 1x/ 3 Weeks)Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure Before and After DialysisDBP before dialysis-2 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 9.4
Cohort F (0.8/150, 1x/ 4 Weeks)Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure Before and After DialysisDBP after dialysis2 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 13.4
Cohort F (0.8/150, 1x/ 4 Weeks)Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure Before and After DialysisSBP after dialysis-5 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 27.6
Cohort F (0.8/150, 1x/ 4 Weeks)Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure Before and After DialysisSBP before dialysis-6 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 20.3
Cohort F (0.8/150, 1x/ 4 Weeks)Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure Before and After DialysisDBP before dialysis2 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 12.9
Cohort G (1.2/150, 1x/ Week)Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure Before and After DialysisDBP after dialysis-3 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 12.2
Cohort G (1.2/150, 1x/ Week)Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure Before and After DialysisSBP after dialysis0 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 25
Cohort G (1.2/150, 1x/ Week)Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure Before and After DialysisSBP before dialysis-2 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 21.4
Cohort G (1.2/150, 1x/ Week)Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure Before and After DialysisDBP before dialysis-3 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 11.9
Cohort H (1.2/150, 1x/ 3 Weeks)Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure Before and After DialysisSBP after dialysis-1 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 27.1
Cohort H (1.2/150, 1x/ 3 Weeks)Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure Before and After DialysisSBP before dialysis1 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 18.6
Cohort H (1.2/150, 1x/ 3 Weeks)Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure Before and After DialysisDBP before dialysis-0 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 11.4
Cohort H (1.2/150, 1x/ 3 Weeks)Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure Before and After DialysisDBP after dialysis5 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 10.2
Cohort I (1.2/150, 1x/ 4 Weeks)Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure Before and After DialysisSBP after dialysis-7 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 18.2
Cohort I (1.2/150, 1x/ 4 Weeks)Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure Before and After DialysisSBP before dialysis-7 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 20
Cohort I (1.2/150, 1x/ 4 Weeks)Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure Before and After DialysisDBP after dialysis-5 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 10.3
Cohort I (1.2/150, 1x/ 4 Weeks)Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure Before and After DialysisDBP before dialysis1 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 8.6
Secondary

Mean Change in Pulse Rate

Mean change in pulse rate was reported.

Time frame: Up to Week 126

Population: The safety population was considered for analysis which included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Participants with available data at the time of evaluation were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A (0.4/150, 1x/ Week)Mean Change in Pulse Rate-6 Beats per minuteStandard Deviation 8.8
Cohort B (0.4/150, 1x/ 3 Weeks)Mean Change in Pulse Rate-2 Beats per minuteStandard Deviation 9.1
Cohort C (0.4/150, 1x/ 4 Weeks)Mean Change in Pulse Rate7 Beats per minuteStandard Deviation 9.1
Cohort D (0.8/150, 1x/ Week)Mean Change in Pulse Rate-1 Beats per minuteStandard Deviation 13.7
Cohort E (0.8/150, 1x/ 3 Weeks)Mean Change in Pulse Rate-1 Beats per minuteStandard Deviation 7.7
Cohort F (0.8/150, 1x/ 4 Weeks)Mean Change in Pulse Rate2 Beats per minuteStandard Deviation 8.1
Cohort G (1.2/150, 1x/ Week)Mean Change in Pulse Rate2 Beats per minuteStandard Deviation 9.9
Cohort H (1.2/150, 1x/ 3 Weeks)Mean Change in Pulse Rate0 Beats per minuteStandard Deviation 6.3
Cohort I (1.2/150, 1x/ 4 Weeks)Mean Change in Pulse Rate1 Beats per minuteStandard Deviation 9.1
Secondary

Median Change From Baseline in Hematocrit Levels to End of Initial Treatment Under Constant Dosing Regimen

Median change from Baseline in hematocrit (Hct) levels to end of initial treatment under constant dosing regimen was reported. Baseline (Day -28 to Day 1) Hct values was calculated as the mean of the SA and run-in period (Weeks -2 and -1). For all participants, an EOIT value was calculated as the last observed Hct value before a dose change or blood transfusion. For participants without any dose adjustments or blood transfusion, the EOIT value was identical to the Week 19 (or Week 21) value.

Time frame: From Baseline (Day -28 to Day 1) to EOIT (Week 19 or Week 21)

Population: The ITT population was considered for analysis which included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort A (0.4/150, 1x/ Week)Median Change From Baseline in Hematocrit Levels to End of Initial Treatment Under Constant Dosing Regimen-2.45 Percentage of Hct
Cohort B (0.4/150, 1x/ 3 Weeks)Median Change From Baseline in Hematocrit Levels to End of Initial Treatment Under Constant Dosing Regimen-1.95 Percentage of Hct
Cohort C (0.4/150, 1x/ 4 Weeks)Median Change From Baseline in Hematocrit Levels to End of Initial Treatment Under Constant Dosing Regimen-0.93 Percentage of Hct
Cohort D (0.8/150, 1x/ Week)Median Change From Baseline in Hematocrit Levels to End of Initial Treatment Under Constant Dosing Regimen0.25 Percentage of Hct
Cohort E (0.8/150, 1x/ 3 Weeks)Median Change From Baseline in Hematocrit Levels to End of Initial Treatment Under Constant Dosing Regimen-0.37 Percentage of Hct
Cohort F (0.8/150, 1x/ 4 Weeks)Median Change From Baseline in Hematocrit Levels to End of Initial Treatment Under Constant Dosing Regimen-0.75 Percentage of Hct
Cohort G (1.2/150, 1x/ Week)Median Change From Baseline in Hematocrit Levels to End of Initial Treatment Under Constant Dosing Regimen2.25 Percentage of Hct
Cohort H (1.2/150, 1x/ 3 Weeks)Median Change From Baseline in Hematocrit Levels to End of Initial Treatment Under Constant Dosing Regimen1.22 Percentage of Hct
Cohort I (1.2/150, 1x/ 4 Weeks)Median Change From Baseline in Hematocrit Levels to End of Initial Treatment Under Constant Dosing Regimen0.73 Percentage of Hct
Secondary

Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events, Any Serious Adverse Events, And Deaths

An Adverse Events (AEs) is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is a significant medical event in the investigator's judgment or requires intervention to prevent one or other of these outcomes. The study design tested 3 different starting dose conversion factors at 3 different dosing schedules during the core study period. As study drug doses can be modified continually over time all results for the two long term safety periods were displayed by dose schedule group only.

Time frame: Up to Week 126

Population: The safety population was considered for analysis which included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort A (0.4/150, 1x/ Week)Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events, Any Serious Adverse Events, And DeathsAny SAEs15 Participants
Cohort A (0.4/150, 1x/ Week)Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events, Any Serious Adverse Events, And DeathsAny AEs44 Participants
Cohort A (0.4/150, 1x/ Week)Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events, Any Serious Adverse Events, And DeathsDeaths7 Participants
Cohort B (0.4/150, 1x/ 3 Weeks)Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events, Any Serious Adverse Events, And DeathsAny SAEs13 Participants
Cohort B (0.4/150, 1x/ 3 Weeks)Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events, Any Serious Adverse Events, And DeathsAny AEs33 Participants
Cohort B (0.4/150, 1x/ 3 Weeks)Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events, Any Serious Adverse Events, And DeathsDeaths4 Participants
Cohort C (0.4/150, 1x/ 4 Weeks)Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events, Any Serious Adverse Events, And DeathsAny AEs40 Participants
Cohort C (0.4/150, 1x/ 4 Weeks)Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events, Any Serious Adverse Events, And DeathsDeaths10 Participants
Cohort C (0.4/150, 1x/ 4 Weeks)Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events, Any Serious Adverse Events, And DeathsAny SAEs20 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities

Participants with marked laboratory abnormalities were reported. Marked abnormality criteria: Serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT); high \>25 units per litre (U/L), albumin (low \< 31 grams per litre \[g/L\]), total protein (\< 60 g/L), phosphate (high \>1.45 millimoles per litre \[mmol/L\]); Low \<0.84 mmol/L), potassium (high \>5 mmol/L; Low \<3.5 mmol/L), platelets (low:\<150×10\^9/L), White blood cells (\[WBCs\]); high: 10.8×10\^9/L and Low:4.3×10\^9/L), basophils (high:\>0.15×10\^9/L), eosinophils (high:\>0.70×10\^9/L), lymphocytes (low:\<1.50×10\^9/L), and neutrophils (low:\<1.83×10\^9/L).

Time frame: Up to Week 126

Population: The safety population was considered for analysis which included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort A (0.4/150, 1x/ Week)Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesAlbumin, Low0 Participants
Cohort A (0.4/150, 1x/ Week)Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesTotal protein, Low0 Participants
Cohort A (0.4/150, 1x/ Week)Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesSGOT, High1 Participants
Cohort B (0.4/150, 1x/ 3 Weeks)Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesAlbumin, Low0 Participants
Cohort B (0.4/150, 1x/ 3 Weeks)Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesSGOT, High0 Participants
Cohort B (0.4/150, 1x/ 3 Weeks)Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesTotal protein, Low0 Participants
Cohort C (0.4/150, 1x/ 4 Weeks)Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesTotal protein, Low1 Participants
Cohort C (0.4/150, 1x/ 4 Weeks)Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesSGOT, High0 Participants
Cohort C (0.4/150, 1x/ 4 Weeks)Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesAlbumin, Low0 Participants
Cohort D (0.8/150, 1x/ Week)Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesAlbumin, Low0 Participants
Cohort D (0.8/150, 1x/ Week)Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesSGOT, High0 Participants
Cohort D (0.8/150, 1x/ Week)Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesTotal protein, Low0 Participants
Cohort E (0.8/150, 1x/ 3 Weeks)Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesAlbumin, Low0 Participants
Cohort E (0.8/150, 1x/ 3 Weeks)Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesTotal protein, Low0 Participants
Cohort E (0.8/150, 1x/ 3 Weeks)Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesSGOT, High0 Participants
Cohort F (0.8/150, 1x/ 4 Weeks)Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesSGOT, High0 Participants
Cohort F (0.8/150, 1x/ 4 Weeks)Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesTotal protein, Low0 Participants
Cohort F (0.8/150, 1x/ 4 Weeks)Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesAlbumin, Low0 Participants
Cohort G (1.2/150, 1x/ Week)Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesTotal protein, Low1 Participants
Cohort G (1.2/150, 1x/ Week)Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesAlbumin, Low0 Participants
Cohort G (1.2/150, 1x/ Week)Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesSGOT, High0 Participants
Cohort H (1.2/150, 1x/ 3 Weeks)Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesSGOT, High0 Participants
Cohort H (1.2/150, 1x/ 3 Weeks)Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesAlbumin, Low0 Participants
Cohort H (1.2/150, 1x/ 3 Weeks)Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesTotal protein, Low0 Participants
Cohort I (1.2/150, 1x/ 4 Weeks)Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesSGOT, High0 Participants
Cohort I (1.2/150, 1x/ 4 Weeks)Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesTotal protein, Low0 Participants
Cohort I (1.2/150, 1x/ 4 Weeks)Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesAlbumin, Low1 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026