Skip to content

Efficacy of Epidural Etanercept in the Treatment of Sciatica

Efficacy of Epidural Etanercept in the Treatment of Sciatica

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00364572
Enrollment
24
Registered
2006-08-15
Start date
2006-05-31
Completion date
2007-12-31
Last updated
2009-01-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sciatica

Keywords

sciatica, low back pain, epidural, tumor necrosis factor

Brief summary

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha has been strongly implicated as a major contributing factor for the development of radiculopathy. In animal studies, the application of TNF-alpha to nerve roots results in pain behavior indicative of radiculopathy. The use of TNF-alpha inhibitors (etanercept and infliximab) have been shown to prevent this pain behavior. Open-label studies in humans have shown both etanercept and infliximab provide excellent, long-term relief in patients with acute radiculopathy from herniated disc. However, a recent placebo-controlled study failed to demonstrate any significant difference from placebo. The investigators have already established the safety of neuraxial etanercept in a trial that has just been completed (not yet published). The objective of this study is to determine whether small doses of epidural etanercept, an anti-TNF-a medication, is an effective treatment for LBP caused by nerve root irritation (i.e., radiculopathy).

Detailed description

As per the wishes of the Dept. of the Army and Walter Reed Army Medical Center Dept. of Clinical Investigation, patients will be randomized in a 3:1 ratio to receive 2 transforaminal epidural etanercept or saline injections at 2-week intervals. Both patients and physicians will be blinded as to the injectate and treatment group. There will be 3 study groups. Group I will receive either 2 mg of etanercept or saline per injection. Group II will receive either 4 mg of etanercept or saline per injection. Group III will receive either 6 mg of etanercept or saline per injection. In each group there will be 8 patients: 6 who receive etanercept and 2 who receive saline. As per a previous study we just completed, etanercept doses will not be escalated until all 6 patients have completed their 1-month follow-up visits without any evidence of toxicity or complications.

Interventions

DRUGepidural injection of etanercept

2 injections of etanercept 2 weeks apart with doses ranging from 2 mg to 6 mg

DRUGplacebo (control procedure)

Two injections of epidural saline 2 weeks apart

Sponsors

Walter Reed Army Medical Center
CollaboratorFED
Johns Hopkins University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Chronic low back pain of radicular origin of \> 2 months but \< 1 year duration. 2. Failure of conservative therapy to include physical and pharmacotherapy. 3. MRI evidence of a herniated disc corresponding to the patient's radicular symptoms. 4. Normal white blood cell count (drawn in 1 blood vial).

Exclusion criteria

1. Uncontrolled coagulopathy. 2. Pregnancy, which will be ruled out by a urine pregnancy test if any question as to the patient's status exists. 3. Allergy to contrast dye. 4. Unstable medical condition (e.g., unstable angina or congestive heart failure). 5. Rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn's disease or spondylarthropathy. 6. Unstable neurological condition (e.g., multiple sclerosis) 7. Systemic infection 8. Age \< 18 or \> 70 years.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Visual analogue scale pain score, Oswestry disability index, medication intake7 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Global perceived effect, white blood cell count7 months

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026