Skip to content

Results Of Patient Rated Asthma Control Test In Comparison To Diary Card Data

Asthma Control Assessment Via ACT and DRC in Asthmatics Treated With Seretide (50/250) Over 12 Weeks

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00363480
Enrollment
221
Registered
2006-08-15
Start date
2006-05-17
Completion date
2007-09-14
Last updated
2018-03-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthma

Keywords

Asthma, Asthma Control Test, SERETIDE

Brief summary

The majority of asthma patients are not well controlled, despite the availability of asthma medication that could effectively treat the disease. In this study uncontrolled patients who are steroid-naive or on low dose inhaled corticosteroids will be treated with Seretide (salmeterol/fluticasone combination, SFC) 50/250 µg twice daily. The asthma control test (ACT) will be used to detect differences in the level of asthma control during treatment. The study aims to show a correlation between improvements of ACT und the level of asthma control which will be reached by the patients. The aim of the study is to show that most of symptomatic asthma patients can reach 'well controlled asthma' with SFC. We get information about ACT in daily practice and physicians are trained to use the asthma control test as a screening tool and for follow up of asthma management. Correlations are expected between the improvements in ACT, Quality of Life and asthma control according to the Gaining Optimal Asthma controL (GOAL) criteria.

Interventions

DRUGSalmeterol/Fluticasone 50/250 mcg

Participant received salmeterol/fluticasone combination 50/250 mcg using DISKUS™ powder inhalers.

This medication was provided in metered dose inhalers containing at least 200 puffs of 100 mcg salbutamol.

DEVICEDISKUS™ powder inhalers

Participant received salmeterol and fluticasone using DISKUS™ powder inhalers.

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of asthma * Reversibility \>12% after inhalation of 200 µg Salbutamol * willingness and ability to complete daily record card on daily basis and to measure morning PEF on daily basis * 80% compliance in diary card completion asthma control status: Uncontrolled based on the GOAL criteria

Exclusion criteria

* Change of asthma medication during the last 4 weeks * Asthma exacerbation characterized by use of oral corticoids during the last 3 months Pretreatment with inhaled corticosteroids more than 500 mcg Beclometasondipropionat or equivalent per day or other controller therapy during the last 3 months * upper or lower respiratory tract infection during the RUN-IN period moderate or severe asthma exacerbation during the RUN-IN period * Non compliance with use of Discus, PEF-meter and incomplete diary card data

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Well Controlled Participants as Per Gaining Optimal Asthma Control (GOAL) Criteria After 12 Week Compared to Percentage of Participants With Asthma Control Test (ACT) Score of 20-25 for Week 9 to Week 12Week 9 to Week 12A week with well controlled asthma, when two or more of the criteria were fulfilled (diary entries): At most 2 days per week with 24-hour symptom score \>1 (Range: 0= None to 5= severe), rescue salbutamol use on \<= 2 days and at most 4 occasions per week, and a morning peak flow \>= 80% of the predicted value on each day per week. All of the criteria which includes no night-time awakenings due to asthma (diary entry), no emergency visits (diary entry), no exacerbations and no treatment-related adverse events leading to treatment change are fulfilled. The total ACT score is based on a range of 5 to 25. Higher score indicates better asthma control. A score of 19 or less may be a sign that asthma symptoms are not under control.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Mean ACT Score at Visit 6Baseline (Viait 3) and Week 12The total ACT score is based on a range of 5 to 25. Higher score indicates better asthma control. A score of 19 or less may be a sign that asthma symptoms not under control. In order to derive the total ACT score, all 5 questions had to be answered. Change from baseline value was calculated by subtracting baseline value from week 12 value. The assessments recorded at Visit 3 were considered as Baseline assessments.
Number of Participants With Well Controlled and Totally Controlled Asthma at Week 12Week 12Well controlled or totally controlled asthma assessments were done according to the GOAL criteria. A week with well controlled asthma, when two or more of the criteria were fulfilled (diary entries): At most 2 days per week with 24-hour symptom score \>1(Range: 0= None to 5= severe), rescue salbutamol use on \<= 2 days and at most 4 occasions per week, and morning peak flow \>= 80% of the predicted value on each day per week. All of the criteria which included no night-time awakenings due to asthma (diary entry),no emergency visits (diary entry), no exacerbations and no treatment-related adverse events leading to treatment change were fulfilled. The total ACT score was based on a range of 5 to 25. Higher score indicates better asthma control. A score of 19 or less may be a sign that asthma symptoms are not under control. Change from baseline value was calculated by subtracting baseline value from week 12 value. The assessments recorded at Visit 3 were considered as Baseline assessments.
Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Using the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ)Baseline (Visit 3) up to Week 12For the level of asthma control, baseline values were derived taking the last 8 weeks during the pre-treatment period prior to Visit 3 into consideration. Regarding derived variables based on the asthma diary, data from the last week prior to Visit 3 was taken. Visit 3, regarded as baseline. AQLQ has 32 questions regarding activities, emotions, symptoms, and environmental triggers. Each item values range from 1 (maximum impairment) to 7 (no impairment). A positive change from baseline score indicates improvement.
Correlation of Change in AQLQ Score and Change in ACT ScoreWeek 12Correlation between change in the AQLQ and ACT score was tabulated using the Pearson coefficient of correlation (linear correlation). The AQLQ contained 32 items in 4 domains: activity limitation, symptoms, emotional function and environmental stimuli. Scores for the domains as well as the overall score were scaled within a range of 1 (worst) to 7 (best).
Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) to Week 12Baseline (Visit 3) up to Week 12FEV1, an amount of air exhaled by a person during a forced breath in one second. FEV1 assessed at Visit 1 and at Visits 3, 4, 5, 6. Baseline was the measurement at Visit 3. Change from baseline value was calculated by subtracting baseline value from week 12 value.
Change From Baseline in Mean Morning Percent Predicted Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Week 12Baseline (Visit 3) and Week 12PEF, a person's maximum speed of expiration, as measured with a peak flow meter, a small, hand-held device used to monitor a person's ability to breathe out air. The mean morning PEF evaluated by means of the data documented in the asthma diaries. Change from baseline value was calculated by subtracting baseline value from week 12 value. The assessments recorded at Visit 3 were considered as Baseline assessments.
Change From Baseline in Mean 24-hour Symptom Score at Week 12Baseline (Visit 3) and Week 12The various symptoms like wheezing, shortness of breath, coughing and chest tightness were assessed by the participants every morning using a symptom score scale which ranged from 0 (no symptoms during the past 24 hours) to 5 (symptoms so severe that participant could not go to work or carry out other normal daily activities). Change from baseline value was calculated by subtracting baseline value from week 12 value. The assessments recorded at Visit 3 were considered as Baseline assessments.
Change From Baseline in Percentage of Participants With ACT Score of 20-25 at Week 12Baseline (Visit 3) and Week 12The total ACT score is based on a range of 5 to 25. Higher score indicates better asthma control. A score of 19 or less may be a sign that asthma symptoms are not under control. In order to derive the total ACT score, all 5 questions needed to be answered. Change from baseline value was calculated by subtracting baseline value from week 12 value. The assessments recorded at Visit 3 were considered as Baseline assessments.
Percent Change From Baseline in Number of Nights With no Nocturnal Awakening at Week 12Baseline (Visit 3) and week 12Number of nights with no night time awakening were recorded at Week 12. Baseline was the last corresponding time period immediately prior to Visit 3.
Number of Participants With Emergency Visits Due to AsthmaUp to week 12Frequencies of emergency visits per participant were recorded during treatment period. Only the participants at risk were considered when calculating the incidence rates.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) Leading to a Change in Asthma TreatmentUp to Week 12AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. Number of participants with AE who lead to change in asthma treatment were reported.
Assessment of Tolerability by Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment Emergent Serious and, Non-serious AEUp to Week 12An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. Number of participants with at least one treatment emergent serious and, non-serious AE were reported.
Assessment of Tolerability by Change From Baseline of Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Baseline (Visit 3) up to Week 12SBP and DBP were recorded over time (Visit 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6). Baseline was the measurement at Visit 3. Change from baseline value was calculated by subtracting baseline value from week 12 value.
Assessment of Tolerability by Change From Baseline of Pulse RateBaseline (Visit 3) up to Week 12Pulse rate was recorded over time (Visit 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6). Baseline was the measurement at Visit 3. Change from baseline value was calculated by subtracting baseline value from week 12 value.
Number of Participants With Occurrence of (Near-) Incidents Associated With Peak Flow MeasurementsUp to Week 12Frequencies of participants with at least one (near-) incident associated with peak flow measurements were recorded. analysis was done on safety population.
Change From Baseline in Number of Additional Usage of Salbutamol at Week 12Baseline (Visit 3) and week 12Salbutamol was given as a rescue medicine, used on \<= 2 days and at most 4 occasions per week. Change from baseline value was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from week 12 value. The assessments recorded at Visit 3 were considered as Baseline assessments.

Countries

Germany

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Study was conducted at 27 centers in Germany from 17 May 2006 to 6 September 2007 on participants diagnosed with perennial bronchial asthma.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 261 participants were screened, of which 40 were screen failure, remaining 221 participants entered the treatment period.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
SFC 50/250 mcg
Participants received SFC 50/250 mcg for 12 weeks. Study treatment was received using DISKUS powder inhalers, one dose in morning and evening. Study medication was dispensed at visits 3, 4, and 5 for 30 days each. The participants were provided with salbutamol rescue medication if they developed acute asthmatic symptoms. This medication was provided in metered dose inhalers containing at least 200 puffs of 100 mcg salbutamol. Use of rescue medications was recorded in the participant's asthma diaries. Stable dosages of other concomitant medications were allowed if they had no impact on the outcome criteria.
221
Total221

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event4
Overall StudyCriteria for treatment period not fulfil1
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up5
Overall StudyNon-compliance of subject1
Overall StudyParticipant discontinued on its own1
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject5

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSFC 50/250 mcg
Age, Continuous49.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.5
Sex: Female, Male
Female
142 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
79 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 221
other
Total, other adverse events
76 / 221
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 221

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Well Controlled Participants as Per Gaining Optimal Asthma Control (GOAL) Criteria After 12 Week Compared to Percentage of Participants With Asthma Control Test (ACT) Score of 20-25 for Week 9 to Week 12

A week with well controlled asthma, when two or more of the criteria were fulfilled (diary entries): At most 2 days per week with 24-hour symptom score \>1 (Range: 0= None to 5= severe), rescue salbutamol use on \<= 2 days and at most 4 occasions per week, and a morning peak flow \>= 80% of the predicted value on each day per week. All of the criteria which includes no night-time awakenings due to asthma (diary entry), no emergency visits (diary entry), no exacerbations and no treatment-related adverse events leading to treatment change are fulfilled. The total ACT score is based on a range of 5 to 25. Higher score indicates better asthma control. A score of 19 or less may be a sign that asthma symptoms are not under control.

Time frame: Week 9 to Week 12

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat population, participants covering treatment period of at least 8 weeks and with assessable asthma control at the end of the treatment period by both criteria (GOAL, ACT), and without major protocol deviations. Only those participants available at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
SFC 50/250 mcgPercentage of Well Controlled Participants as Per Gaining Optimal Asthma Control (GOAL) Criteria After 12 Week Compared to Percentage of Participants With Asthma Control Test (ACT) Score of 20-25 for Week 9 to Week 12GOAL33.5 Percentage
SFC 50/250 mcgPercentage of Well Controlled Participants as Per Gaining Optimal Asthma Control (GOAL) Criteria After 12 Week Compared to Percentage of Participants With Asthma Control Test (ACT) Score of 20-25 for Week 9 to Week 12ACT64.1 Percentage
Comparison: Comparison between GOAL and ACT responsep-value: <0.000195% CI: [-37.89, -23.29]McNemar
Secondary

Assessment of Tolerability by Change From Baseline of Pulse Rate

Pulse rate was recorded over time (Visit 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6). Baseline was the measurement at Visit 3. Change from baseline value was calculated by subtracting baseline value from week 12 value.

Time frame: Baseline (Visit 3) up to Week 12

Population: Safety Set. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SFC 50/250 mcgAssessment of Tolerability by Change From Baseline of Pulse RateWeek 41.0 Beats per minute (bpm)Standard Deviation 9
SFC 50/250 mcgAssessment of Tolerability by Change From Baseline of Pulse RateWeek 8-0.2 Beats per minute (bpm)Standard Deviation 9.1
SFC 50/250 mcgAssessment of Tolerability by Change From Baseline of Pulse RateWeek 120.6 Beats per minute (bpm)Standard Deviation 10.2
Secondary

Assessment of Tolerability by Change From Baseline of Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)

SBP and DBP were recorded over time (Visit 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6). Baseline was the measurement at Visit 3. Change from baseline value was calculated by subtracting baseline value from week 12 value.

Time frame: Baseline (Visit 3) up to Week 12

Population: Safety Set. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SFC 50/250 mcgAssessment of Tolerability by Change From Baseline of Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)SBP, Week 40.8 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 12.7
SFC 50/250 mcgAssessment of Tolerability by Change From Baseline of Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)SBP, Week 8-0.7 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 11.3
SFC 50/250 mcgAssessment of Tolerability by Change From Baseline of Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)SBP, Week 120.2 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 13.5
SFC 50/250 mcgAssessment of Tolerability by Change From Baseline of Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)DBP, Week 40.2 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 8.8
SFC 50/250 mcgAssessment of Tolerability by Change From Baseline of Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)DBP, Week 8-0.2 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 8.4
SFC 50/250 mcgAssessment of Tolerability by Change From Baseline of Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)DBP, Week 120.6 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 9
Secondary

Assessment of Tolerability by Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment Emergent Serious and, Non-serious AE

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. Number of participants with at least one treatment emergent serious and, non-serious AE were reported.

Time frame: Up to Week 12

Population: Safety Set.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
SFC 50/250 mcgAssessment of Tolerability by Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment Emergent Serious and, Non-serious AEAny Non-Serious AE76 Participants
SFC 50/250 mcgAssessment of Tolerability by Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment Emergent Serious and, Non-serious AEAny Serious AE1 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) to Week 12

FEV1, an amount of air exhaled by a person during a forced breath in one second. FEV1 assessed at Visit 1 and at Visits 3, 4, 5, 6. Baseline was the measurement at Visit 3. Change from baseline value was calculated by subtracting baseline value from week 12 value.

Time frame: Baseline (Visit 3) up to Week 12

Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants available at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SFC 50/250 mcgChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) to Week 12Week 40.133 Litre/second (L/Sec)Standard Deviation 0.32
SFC 50/250 mcgChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) to Week 12Week 80.212 Litre/second (L/Sec)Standard Deviation 0.359
SFC 50/250 mcgChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) to Week 12Week 120.181 Litre/second (L/Sec)Standard Deviation 0.372
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Mean 24-hour Symptom Score at Week 12

The various symptoms like wheezing, shortness of breath, coughing and chest tightness were assessed by the participants every morning using a symptom score scale which ranged from 0 (no symptoms during the past 24 hours) to 5 (symptoms so severe that participant could not go to work or carry out other normal daily activities). Change from baseline value was calculated by subtracting baseline value from week 12 value. The assessments recorded at Visit 3 were considered as Baseline assessments.

Time frame: Baseline (Visit 3) and Week 12

Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants available at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SFC 50/250 mcgChange From Baseline in Mean 24-hour Symptom Score at Week 12-0.590 Score on ScaleStandard Deviation 0.948
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Mean ACT Score at Visit 6

The total ACT score is based on a range of 5 to 25. Higher score indicates better asthma control. A score of 19 or less may be a sign that asthma symptoms not under control. In order to derive the total ACT score, all 5 questions had to be answered. Change from baseline value was calculated by subtracting baseline value from week 12 value. The assessments recorded at Visit 3 were considered as Baseline assessments.

Time frame: Baseline (Viait 3) and Week 12

Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants available at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SFC 50/250 mcgChange From Baseline in Mean ACT Score at Visit 65.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.3
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Mean Morning Percent Predicted Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Week 12

PEF, a person's maximum speed of expiration, as measured with a peak flow meter, a small, hand-held device used to monitor a person's ability to breathe out air. The mean morning PEF evaluated by means of the data documented in the asthma diaries. Change from baseline value was calculated by subtracting baseline value from week 12 value. The assessments recorded at Visit 3 were considered as Baseline assessments.

Time frame: Baseline (Visit 3) and Week 12

Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants available at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SFC 50/250 mcgChange From Baseline in Mean Morning Percent Predicted Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) at Week 127.798 PercentageStandard Deviation 10.302
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Number of Additional Usage of Salbutamol at Week 12

Salbutamol was given as a rescue medicine, used on \<= 2 days and at most 4 occasions per week. Change from baseline value was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from week 12 value. The assessments recorded at Visit 3 were considered as Baseline assessments.

Time frame: Baseline (Visit 3) and week 12

Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants available at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SFC 50/250 mcgChange From Baseline in Number of Additional Usage of Salbutamol at Week 12-0.933 Number of occassionsStandard Deviation 1.331
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Percentage of Participants With ACT Score of 20-25 at Week 12

The total ACT score is based on a range of 5 to 25. Higher score indicates better asthma control. A score of 19 or less may be a sign that asthma symptoms are not under control. In order to derive the total ACT score, all 5 questions needed to be answered. Change from baseline value was calculated by subtracting baseline value from week 12 value. The assessments recorded at Visit 3 were considered as Baseline assessments.

Time frame: Baseline (Visit 3) and Week 12

Population: Full Analysis Set comprised of all participants with at least one post-baseline (Visit 3) efficacy measurement during clinic visits (Visit 4, 5, 6) or valid diary data documented for at least one week post-baseline was included. Only those participants available at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
SFC 50/250 mcgChange From Baseline in Percentage of Participants With ACT Score of 20-25 at Week 12Baseline32 Participants
SFC 50/250 mcgChange From Baseline in Percentage of Participants With ACT Score of 20-25 at Week 12Week 12139 Participants
95% CI: [43.15, 57.32]
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Using the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ)

For the level of asthma control, baseline values were derived taking the last 8 weeks during the pre-treatment period prior to Visit 3 into consideration. Regarding derived variables based on the asthma diary, data from the last week prior to Visit 3 was taken. Visit 3, regarded as baseline. AQLQ has 32 questions regarding activities, emotions, symptoms, and environmental triggers. Each item values range from 1 (maximum impairment) to 7 (no impairment). A positive change from baseline score indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline (Visit 3) up to Week 12

Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants available at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SFC 50/250 mcgChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Using the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ)0.83 Score on ScaleStandard Deviation 0.91
Secondary

Correlation of Change in AQLQ Score and Change in ACT Score

Correlation between change in the AQLQ and ACT score was tabulated using the Pearson coefficient of correlation (linear correlation). The AQLQ contained 32 items in 4 domains: activity limitation, symptoms, emotional function and environmental stimuli. Scores for the domains as well as the overall score were scaled within a range of 1 (worst) to 7 (best).

Time frame: Week 12

Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants available at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
SFC 50/250 mcgCorrelation of Change in AQLQ Score and Change in ACT Score0.522 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) Leading to a Change in Asthma Treatment

AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. Number of participants with AE who lead to change in asthma treatment were reported.

Time frame: Up to Week 12

Population: Safety Set.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
SFC 50/250 mcgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) Leading to a Change in Asthma Treatment4 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Emergency Visits Due to Asthma

Frequencies of emergency visits per participant were recorded during treatment period. Only the participants at risk were considered when calculating the incidence rates.

Time frame: Up to week 12

Population: Safety set comprised of participants who received study medication at least once s participants who did not administer any study medication (those who returned all study medication dispensed) were not included in the Safety Set. Only those participants available at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
SFC 50/250 mcgNumber of Participants With Emergency Visits Due to AsthmaAt least 1 day13 Participants
SFC 50/250 mcgNumber of Participants With Emergency Visits Due to Asthma1 day10 Participants
SFC 50/250 mcgNumber of Participants With Emergency Visits Due to Asthma2 days2 Participants
SFC 50/250 mcgNumber of Participants With Emergency Visits Due to Asthma3-4 days1 Participants
SFC 50/250 mcgNumber of Participants With Emergency Visits Due to Asthma5-9 days0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Occurrence of (Near-) Incidents Associated With Peak Flow Measurements

Frequencies of participants with at least one (near-) incident associated with peak flow measurements were recorded. analysis was done on safety population.

Time frame: Up to Week 12

Population: Safety Set.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
SFC 50/250 mcgNumber of Participants With Occurrence of (Near-) Incidents Associated With Peak Flow Measurements0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Well Controlled and Totally Controlled Asthma at Week 12

Well controlled or totally controlled asthma assessments were done according to the GOAL criteria. A week with well controlled asthma, when two or more of the criteria were fulfilled (diary entries): At most 2 days per week with 24-hour symptom score \>1(Range: 0= None to 5= severe), rescue salbutamol use on \<= 2 days and at most 4 occasions per week, and morning peak flow \>= 80% of the predicted value on each day per week. All of the criteria which included no night-time awakenings due to asthma (diary entry),no emergency visits (diary entry), no exacerbations and no treatment-related adverse events leading to treatment change were fulfilled. The total ACT score was based on a range of 5 to 25. Higher score indicates better asthma control. A score of 19 or less may be a sign that asthma symptoms are not under control. Change from baseline value was calculated by subtracting baseline value from week 12 value. The assessments recorded at Visit 3 were considered as Baseline assessments.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants available at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
SFC 50/250 mcgNumber of Participants With Well Controlled and Totally Controlled Asthma at Week 12Well Controlled65 Participants
SFC 50/250 mcgNumber of Participants With Well Controlled and Totally Controlled Asthma at Week 12Totally Controlled29 Participants
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Number of Nights With no Nocturnal Awakening at Week 12

Number of nights with no night time awakening were recorded at Week 12. Baseline was the last corresponding time period immediately prior to Visit 3.

Time frame: Baseline (Visit 3) and week 12

Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants available at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SFC 50/250 mcgPercent Change From Baseline in Number of Nights With no Nocturnal Awakening at Week 127.228 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 24.921

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026