Congenital Abnormalities, Dyslipidemias, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Hypercholesterolemia, Hyperlipidemias, Hypobetalipoproteinemias, Hypolipoproteinemia, Hypolipoproteinemias, Infant, Newborn, Diseases, Lipid Metabolism Disorders, Lipid Metabolism, Inborn Errors, Metabolic Diseases, Metabolic Disorder, Metabolism, Inborn Errors
Conditions
Keywords
LDL-cholesterol, apoB-100, apoB-48, triglyceride, HeFH, FHBL
Brief summary
This study will assess what, if any, effect that ISIS 301012 (mipomersen) has on liver triglyceride content in multiple groups of subjects with varying degrees of risk for hepatic steatosis. In order to enroll subject groups with varying degrees of risk, the study has included multiple cohorts (Cohorts A-G). Additions and removal of cohorts has been accomplished with protocol amendments.
Detailed description
This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to measure the effect of treatment with mipomersen on liver triglyceride (TG) content in patients with varying degrees of hyperlipidemia and risk for hepatic steatosis. The original study design included 4 cohorts (Cohorts A through D). Subsequent protocol amendments added 3 cohorts (Cohorts E, F, and G) to the study, truncated the enrollment of Cohort D, and eliminated Cohorts B and C. The study consisted of up to a 3-week screening period; a 4-week (Cohorts A and D), 13-week (Cohort E), or 52-week (Cohort G) treatment period; and a 20-week post-treatment follow-up period. Cohort F was an observational cohort, and therefore, was not treated with study drug. Patients in this cohort underwent a 15-week Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) and ultrasound evaluation period. The study cohorts are: Cohort A: Healthy volunteers with LDL-C \<140 mg/dL (3.6 mmol/L), serum TG \<200 mg/dL (2.3 mmol/L), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) \<6.0%, and hepatic TG content \<5% (as measured by MRS at screening). Patients were randomized to mipomersen 200 mg or placebo and treated for 4 weeks. Cohorts B+C were eliminated in a protocol amendment prior to enrolling any patients and are not discussed further. Cohort D: In an amendment to the protocol, Cohort D was closed to enrollment. One patient had already been enrolled in the study prior to the amendment. The patient enrolled in this cohort had impaired fasting glucose (defined as fasting blood glucose \>6 mmol/L and \<7 mmol/L) and mixed dyslipidemia (LDL-C \<215 mg/dL \[5.6 mmol/L\] and serum TG \>200 mg/dL \[2.3 mmol/L\]). The patient was treated with mipomersen 200 mg for 4 weeks. Cohort E: Patients with uncomplicated heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) (Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≤1.5 \* upper limit of normal Upper limit of normal (ULN), no evidence of insulin resistance or metabolic syndrome, and hepatic TG content \<5% by MRS at screening). Patients were to remain on their baseline statin ± ezetimibe regimen but were to wash out from other lipid-lowering agents (e.g., fenofibrate, non-dietary omega-3 fatty acids, and niacin) at least 8 weeks prior to the MRS at screening. Patients were randomized to either mipomersen 200 mg or placebo for 13 weeks. Cohort F: Patients with familial hypobetalipoproteinemia (FHBL) (a documented APOB gene mutation that results in the expression of a truncated form of apo B). Patients in this cohort were evaluated by MRS, ultrasound, and laboratory tests; however, they were not treated with mipomersen or placebo. Cohort G: Patients with well-controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (HbA1c ≤8.0%), hypercholesterolemia (LDL-C \>100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L), and normal serum TG levels (≤200 mg/dL \[2.26 mmol/L\]). Patients were to have been on a stable dose of antidiabetic and lipid-lowering medications \>3 months prior to screening and were expected to remain stable for the duration of the study. Patients were randomized to either mipomersen 200 mg or placebo for 26 weeks, followed by 26 additional weeks of mipomersen 200 mg. Recruiting difficulties caused this cohort to close early.
Interventions
200 mg subcutaneous injections
subcutaneous injections
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Group A - are healthy subjects * Group D - has impaired fasting glucose and mixed dyslipidemia * Group E - has a diagnosis of Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) and on stable lipid-lowering therapy for 3 months * Group F - has a diagnosis of Familial Hypobetalipoproteinemia (FHBL) * Group G - has a diagnosis of Diabetes and hypercholesterolemia
Exclusion criteria
* Medical, surgical, laboratory or other conditions which in the judgment of the Physician Investigator would make the subject unsuitable for enrollment, or potentially interfere with subject participation or completion of the study.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Liver Triglyceride (TG) Content As Measured by Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) | Baseline, Day 26, Day 99 | Localized proton MRS was used to quantify liver TG concentration. All MRS imaging of the liver was performed using the same 1.5T scanner. The instructions were to cover the entire liver (from just above the dome to just below the inferior tip) using a qualified imaging technique (Yokoo, 2009, Radiology). Liver fat quantification was performed by determining the liver fat fraction (%) derived from MRS using selected Regions of Interest (ROI). The analyst typically looked for the branching of the right portal vein and mapped slices from one scan to the next. There were typically 2 ROIs in the right lobe and 1 in the left lobe. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging ROIs between different scans were selected using anatomical landmarks for both time points. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percent Change in Apolipoprotein B From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 26 and Day 99 | Samples were taken following an overnight fast. |
| Baseline Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol | Baseline | Samples were taken following overnight fast. |
| Baseline Apolipoprotein B | Baseline | Samples were taken following an overnight fast. |
| Baseline Total Cholesterol | Baseline | Samples were taken following an overnight fast. |
| Percent Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 26 and Day 99 | Samples were taken following an overnight fast. |
| Percent Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 26 and Day 99 | Samples were taken following an overnight fast. |
Countries
Netherlands
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Cohort A: Mipomersen Healthy volunteers treated with 6 injections of mipomersen 200 mg over the course of 4 weeks. | 4 |
| Cohort A: Placebo Healthy volunteers treated with 6 injections of placebo over the course of 4 weeks. | 2 |
| Cohort D: Mipomersen Participants with impaired fasting glucose and mixed dyslipidemia who were treated with 6 injections of mipomersen 200 mg over the course of 4 weeks. | 1 |
| Cohort D: Placebo Participants with impaired fasting glucose and mixed dyslipidemia who were treated with 6 injections of placebo over the course of 4 weeks. | 0 |
| Cohort E: Placebo Participants with uncomplicated heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) treated with weekly placebo injections for 13 weeks. | 11 |
| Cohort E: Mipomersen Participants with uncomplicated heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) treated with weekly mipomersen 200 mg injections for 13 weeks. | 10 |
| Cohort F: no Study Intervention A reference group of participants with familial hypobetalipoproteinemia (FBHL) who did not receive a study intervention. Data gathered for 15 weeks. | 6 |
| Cohort G: Mipomersen Participants with well-controlled Type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, and normal triglyceride levels were treated with mipomersen 200 mg weekly for 26 weeks, followed by open-label mipomersen 200 mg weekly for an additional 26 weeks. | 3 |
| Cohort G: Placebo Followed by Mipomersen Participants with well-controlled Type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, and normal triglyceride levels were treated with placebo weekly for 26 weeks, followed by open-label mipomersen 200 mg weekly for an additional 26 weeks. | 1 |
| Total | 38 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 | FG004 | FG005 | FG006 | FG007 | FG008 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treated Period | Adverse Event | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Treated Period | Withdrawal by Subject | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Total | Cohort A: Mipomersen | Cohort A: Placebo | Cohort D: Mipomersen | Cohort E: Placebo | Cohort E: Mipomersen | Cohort F: no Study Intervention | Cohort G: Mipomersen | Cohort G: Placebo Followed by Mipomersen |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 53.5 years | 58.5 years | 40.5 years | 59.0 years | 46.0 years | 50.0 years | 49.5 years | 62.0 years | 58.0 years |
| Gender Female | 20 participants | 2 participants | 1 participants | 1 participants | 8 participants | 4 participants | 1 participants | 2 participants | 1 participants |
| Gender Male | 18 participants | 2 participants | 1 participants | 0 participants | 3 participants | 6 participants | 5 participants | 1 participants | 0 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black or African American | 1 participants | 0 participants | 1 participants | 0 participants | 0 participants | 0 participants | 0 participants | 0 participants | 0 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 37 participants | 4 participants | 1 participants | 1 participants | 11 participants | 10 participants | 6 participants | 3 participants | 1 participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 14 / 14 | 19 / 19 | 3 / 6 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 14 | 1 / 19 | 0 / 6 |
Outcome results
Change From Baseline in Liver Triglyceride (TG) Content As Measured by Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS)
Localized proton MRS was used to quantify liver TG concentration. All MRS imaging of the liver was performed using the same 1.5T scanner. The instructions were to cover the entire liver (from just above the dome to just below the inferior tip) using a qualified imaging technique (Yokoo, 2009, Radiology). Liver fat quantification was performed by determining the liver fat fraction (%) derived from MRS using selected Regions of Interest (ROI). The analyst typically looked for the branching of the right portal vein and mapped slices from one scan to the next. There were typically 2 ROIs in the right lobe and 1 in the left lobe. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging ROIs between different scans were selected using anatomical landmarks for both time points.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 26, Day 99
Population: Full analysis set. In Cohort E: Placebo, Day 99 N=11 instead of 10 because participant did not have a post treatment MRS by Day 26.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort A: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Liver Triglyceride (TG) Content As Measured by Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) | Baseline (Cohort E: Placebo n=11) | 0.2 percentage of total liver content |
| Cohort A: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Liver Triglyceride (TG) Content As Measured by Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) | Day 99 (Cohort E: Placebo n=11) | NA percentage of total liver content |
| Cohort A: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Liver Triglyceride (TG) Content As Measured by Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) | Day 26 (Cohort E: Placebo n=10) | 0.3 percentage of total liver content |
| Cohort A: Mipomersen | Change From Baseline in Liver Triglyceride (TG) Content As Measured by Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) | Day 99 (Cohort E: Placebo n=11) | NA percentage of total liver content |
| Cohort A: Mipomersen | Change From Baseline in Liver Triglyceride (TG) Content As Measured by Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) | Day 26 (Cohort E: Placebo n=10) | 0.3 percentage of total liver content |
| Cohort A: Mipomersen | Change From Baseline in Liver Triglyceride (TG) Content As Measured by Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) | Baseline (Cohort E: Placebo n=11) | 1.2 percentage of total liver content |
| Cohort D | Change From Baseline in Liver Triglyceride (TG) Content As Measured by Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) | Day 99 (Cohort E: Placebo n=11) | NA percentage of total liver content |
| Cohort D | Change From Baseline in Liver Triglyceride (TG) Content As Measured by Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) | Baseline (Cohort E: Placebo n=11) | 6.4 percentage of total liver content |
| Cohort D | Change From Baseline in Liver Triglyceride (TG) Content As Measured by Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) | Day 26 (Cohort E: Placebo n=10) | 4.45 percentage of total liver content |
| Cohort E: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Liver Triglyceride (TG) Content As Measured by Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) | Baseline (Cohort E: Placebo n=11) | 0.8 percentage of total liver content |
| Cohort E: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Liver Triglyceride (TG) Content As Measured by Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) | Day 26 (Cohort E: Placebo n=10) | 0.1 percentage of total liver content |
| Cohort E: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Liver Triglyceride (TG) Content As Measured by Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) | Day 99 (Cohort E: Placebo n=11) | -0.0 percentage of total liver content |
| Cohort E: Mipomersen | Change From Baseline in Liver Triglyceride (TG) Content As Measured by Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) | Day 26 (Cohort E: Placebo n=10) | 0.1 percentage of total liver content |
| Cohort E: Mipomersen | Change From Baseline in Liver Triglyceride (TG) Content As Measured by Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) | Baseline (Cohort E: Placebo n=11) | 1.1 percentage of total liver content |
| Cohort E: Mipomersen | Change From Baseline in Liver Triglyceride (TG) Content As Measured by Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) | Day 99 (Cohort E: Placebo n=11) | 0.4 percentage of total liver content |
| Cohort F: no Study Intervention | Change From Baseline in Liver Triglyceride (TG) Content As Measured by Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) | Day 26 (Cohort E: Placebo n=10) | -1.2 percentage of total liver content |
| Cohort F: no Study Intervention | Change From Baseline in Liver Triglyceride (TG) Content As Measured by Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) | Baseline (Cohort E: Placebo n=11) | 21.4 percentage of total liver content |
| Cohort F: no Study Intervention | Change From Baseline in Liver Triglyceride (TG) Content As Measured by Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) | Day 99 (Cohort E: Placebo n=11) | 0.8 percentage of total liver content |
| Cohort G: Placebo Followed by Mipomersen | Change From Baseline in Liver Triglyceride (TG) Content As Measured by Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) | Day 26 (Cohort E: Placebo n=10) | NA percentage of total liver content |
| Cohort G: Placebo Followed by Mipomersen | Change From Baseline in Liver Triglyceride (TG) Content As Measured by Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) | Baseline (Cohort E: Placebo n=11) | 2.6 percentage of total liver content |
| Cohort G: Placebo Followed by Mipomersen | Change From Baseline in Liver Triglyceride (TG) Content As Measured by Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) | Day 99 (Cohort E: Placebo n=11) | -1.0 percentage of total liver content |
| Cohort G: Mipomersen | Change From Baseline in Liver Triglyceride (TG) Content As Measured by Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) | Baseline (Cohort E: Placebo n=11) | 2.5 percentage of total liver content |
| Cohort G: Mipomersen | Change From Baseline in Liver Triglyceride (TG) Content As Measured by Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) | Day 26 (Cohort E: Placebo n=10) | NA percentage of total liver content |
| Cohort G: Mipomersen | Change From Baseline in Liver Triglyceride (TG) Content As Measured by Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) | Day 99 (Cohort E: Placebo n=11) | 7.8 percentage of total liver content |
Baseline Apolipoprotein B
Samples were taken following an overnight fast.
Time frame: Baseline
Population: Full analysis set
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A: Placebo | Baseline Apolipoprotein B | 86 mg/wk |
| Cohort A: Mipomersen | Baseline Apolipoprotein B | 100.5 mg/wk |
| Cohort D | Baseline Apolipoprotein B | 155 mg/wk |
| Cohort E: Placebo | Baseline Apolipoprotein B | 122.0 mg/wk |
| Cohort E: Mipomersen | Baseline Apolipoprotein B | 126.5 mg/wk |
| Cohort F: no Study Intervention | Baseline Apolipoprotein B | 31.5 mg/wk |
| Cohort G: Placebo Followed by Mipomersen | Baseline Apolipoprotein B | 120.0 mg/wk |
| Cohort G: Mipomersen | Baseline Apolipoprotein B | 113.0 mg/wk |
Baseline Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
Samples were taken following overnight fast.
Time frame: Baseline
Population: Full analysis set
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A: Placebo | Baseline Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol | 103.5 mg/wk |
| Cohort A: Mipomersen | Baseline Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol | 126.0 mg/wk |
| Cohort D | Baseline Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol | 156.0 mg/wk |
| Cohort E: Placebo | Baseline Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol | 148.0 mg/wk |
| Cohort E: Mipomersen | Baseline Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol | 151.5 mg/wk |
| Cohort F: no Study Intervention | Baseline Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol | 41.5 mg/wk |
| Cohort G: Placebo Followed by Mipomersen | Baseline Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol | 147.0 mg/wk |
| Cohort G: Mipomersen | Baseline Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol | 121.0 mg/wk |
Baseline Total Cholesterol
Samples were taken following an overnight fast.
Time frame: Baseline
Population: Full analysis set
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A: Placebo | Baseline Total Cholesterol | 201.0 mg/wk |
| Cohort A: Mipomersen | Baseline Total Cholesterol | 207.0 mg/wk |
| Cohort D | Baseline Total Cholesterol | 263.0 mg/wk |
| Cohort E: Placebo | Baseline Total Cholesterol | 208.0 mg/wk |
| Cohort E: Mipomersen | Baseline Total Cholesterol | 220.5 mg/wk |
| Cohort F: no Study Intervention | Baseline Total Cholesterol | 107.0 mg/wk |
| Cohort G: Placebo Followed by Mipomersen | Baseline Total Cholesterol | 231.0 mg/wk |
| Cohort G: Mipomersen | Baseline Total Cholesterol | 199.0 mg/wk |
Percent Change in Apolipoprotein B From Baseline to Day 99
Samples were taken following an overnight fast.
Time frame: Day 26 and Day 99
Population: Full analysis set with last observation carried forward.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort A: Placebo | Percent Change in Apolipoprotein B From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 99 | NA percent change |
| Cohort A: Placebo | Percent Change in Apolipoprotein B From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 26 | -3.3 percent change |
| Cohort A: Mipomersen | Percent Change in Apolipoprotein B From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 99 | NA percent change |
| Cohort A: Mipomersen | Percent Change in Apolipoprotein B From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 26 | -20.8 percent change |
| Cohort D | Percent Change in Apolipoprotein B From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 26 | -41.6149 percent change |
| Cohort D | Percent Change in Apolipoprotein B From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 99 | NA percent change |
| Cohort E: Placebo | Percent Change in Apolipoprotein B From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 26 | -1.1 percent change |
| Cohort E: Placebo | Percent Change in Apolipoprotein B From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 99 | 6.0 percent change |
| Cohort E: Mipomersen | Percent Change in Apolipoprotein B From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 26 | -1.8 percent change |
| Cohort E: Mipomersen | Percent Change in Apolipoprotein B From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 99 | -16.3 percent change |
| Cohort F: no Study Intervention | Percent Change in Apolipoprotein B From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 99 | 4.1 percent change |
| Cohort F: no Study Intervention | Percent Change in Apolipoprotein B From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 26 | 3.6 percent change |
| Cohort G: Placebo Followed by Mipomersen | Percent Change in Apolipoprotein B From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 26 | NA percent change |
| Cohort G: Placebo Followed by Mipomersen | Percent Change in Apolipoprotein B From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 99 | -25.8 percent change |
| Cohort G: Mipomersen | Percent Change in Apolipoprotein B From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 26 | NA percent change |
| Cohort G: Mipomersen | Percent Change in Apolipoprotein B From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 99 | -44.2 percent change |
Percent Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline to Day 99
Samples were taken following an overnight fast.
Time frame: Day 26 and Day 99
Population: Full analysis set with last observation carried forward.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort A: Placebo | Percent Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 26 | 1.1 percent change |
| Cohort A: Placebo | Percent Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 99 | NA percent change |
| Cohort A: Mipomersen | Percent Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 26 | -14.3 percent change |
| Cohort A: Mipomersen | Percent Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 99 | NA percent change |
| Cohort D | Percent Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 26 | -41.7143 percent change |
| Cohort D | Percent Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 99 | NA percent change |
| Cohort E: Placebo | Percent Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 26 | -2.7 percent change |
| Cohort E: Placebo | Percent Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 99 | 0.7 percent change |
| Cohort E: Mipomersen | Percent Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 26 | -5.4 percent change |
| Cohort E: Mipomersen | Percent Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 99 | -15.9 percent change |
| Cohort F: no Study Intervention | Percent Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 26 | 0.0 percent change |
| Cohort F: no Study Intervention | Percent Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 99 | 2.6 percent change |
| Cohort G: Placebo Followed by Mipomersen | Percent Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 99 | -19.0 percent change |
| Cohort G: Placebo Followed by Mipomersen | Percent Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 26 | NA percent change |
| Cohort G: Mipomersen | Percent Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 26 | NA percent change |
| Cohort G: Mipomersen | Percent Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 99 | -33.9 percent change |
Percent Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Day 99
Samples were taken following an overnight fast.
Time frame: Day 26 and Day 99
Population: Full analysis set with last observation carried forward.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort A: Placebo | Percent Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 26 | -3.5 percent change |
| Cohort A: Placebo | Percent Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 99 | NA percent change |
| Cohort A: Mipomersen | Percent Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 26 | -11.7 percent change |
| Cohort A: Mipomersen | Percent Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 99 | NA percent change |
| Cohort D | Percent Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 26 | -29.5374 percent change |
| Cohort D | Percent Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 99 | NA percent change |
| Cohort E: Placebo | Percent Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 26 | -3.1 percent change |
| Cohort E: Placebo | Percent Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 99 | -11.8 percent change |
| Cohort E: Mipomersen | Percent Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 26 | 0.1 percent change |
| Cohort E: Mipomersen | Percent Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 99 | -0.8 percent change |
| Cohort F: no Study Intervention | Percent Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 26 | 1.4 percent change |
| Cohort F: no Study Intervention | Percent Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 99 | -0.4 percent change |
| Cohort G: Placebo Followed by Mipomersen | Percent Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 99 | -21.6 percent change |
| Cohort G: Placebo Followed by Mipomersen | Percent Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 26 | NA percent change |
| Cohort G: Mipomersen | Percent Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 26 | NA percent change |
| Cohort G: Mipomersen | Percent Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Day 99 | Day 99 | -21.6 percent change |