Skip to content

Safety and Effectiveness of Omega 3-Fatty Acids, EPA Versus DHA, for the Treatment of Major Depression

Omega-3 Fatty Acids for Treatment of Major Depression: Differential Effects of EPA and DHA, and Associated Biochemical and Immune Parameters

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00361374
Enrollment
196
Registered
2006-08-08
Start date
2006-07-31
Completion date
2013-03-31
Last updated
2014-07-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Major Depressive Disorder

Keywords

Depression, Omega-3, Boston

Brief summary

This study examines the difference in the effectiveness of two natural compounds, eicosapentanoic (EPA) and docosahexanoic (DHA)omega-3 fatty acids, in treating major depressive disorder. Both types of omega-3 fatty acids are commonly found in fish oils. It is believed that a deficiency in these omega-3 fatty acids may lead to the development of major depression.

Detailed description

The study lasts for eight weeks and involves four visits after the screen and baseline visits (biweekly). Participants will be randomized, or chosen by chance, to enter into one of three groups. People in the first group will take 1 g/day or EPA omega-3 fatty acid, those in the second group will take 1 g/day of DHA omega-3 fatty acid, and those in the third group will take a placebo. This study is double-blind, which means that neither the participant, nor the doctor, nor the research staff will know which group each person is in. At the end of the study the participant will be offered three months of follow-up care at the Depression Clinical and Research Program.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTeicosapentaenoic acid

1 gram/day

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTdocosahexaenoic acid

1 gram/day

DRUGPlacebo

980 milligram/day

Sponsors

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
CollaboratorNIH
Massachusetts General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Men or women aged 18-80 years old. * Must meet criteria for current Major Depressive Disorder.

Exclusion criteria

* Serious or unstable medical illness including cardiovascular, hepatic, renal, respiratory, endocrine, neurologic, or hematologic disease * History of seizure disorder. * Substance use disorders, including alcohol, active within the last six months (past history is OK). * History of multiple adverse drug reactions or allergy to the study drugs.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Score on a Depression Severity Rating Scale Over Eight Weeks8 weeksChange in score on 17-item Hamilton D depression severity rating scale over 8 weeks of treatment. Scores were obtained every 2 weeks for 8 weeks. The total sum score of the 17 items is used to assess depressive severity. Possible total scores range from 0-52, with a higher score indicating greater depressive severity. Scores of 7 or less are indicative of full remission (i.e. no depression). Scores of 8-15 indicate mild depression; scores of 16-25 indicate moderate depression; scores of 25 or greater indicate severe depression. Mixed model repeated measures analysis (MMRM) was used to examine treatment group effect on changes from baseline to week 8 in Hamilton D scores. Models included subjects as a random effect, and treatment group and study week as fixed effects. An auto-regressive covariance structure was used because it provided the best fit to the data. Site and baseline score were included as covariates in all models.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

196 adults with MDD were recruited from 05/18/06 to 06/30/11 at Massachusetts General Hospital and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Eicosapentaenoic Acid (EPA)
Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) Omega-3, 1g/day eicosapentaenoic acid: 1 gram/day
60
Docosahexaenoic Acid (DHA)
Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) Omega-3, 1g/day docosahexaenoic acid: 1 gram/day
58
Placebo
Placebo capsule (980mg soybean oil) Placebo: 980 milligram/day
59
Total177

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEicosapentaenoic Acid (EPA)Docosahexaenoic Acid (DHA)PlaceboTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
7 Participants8 Participants5 Participants20 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
53 Participants50 Participants54 Participants157 Participants
Age, Continuous45.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.5
46.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8
45.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
45.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.5
Region of Enrollment
United States
60 participants58 participants59 participants177 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
38 Participants32 Participants35 Participants105 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
22 Participants26 Participants24 Participants72 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
39 / 6040 / 5843 / 59
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 600 / 580 / 59

Outcome results

Primary

Score on a Depression Severity Rating Scale Over Eight Weeks

Change in score on 17-item Hamilton D depression severity rating scale over 8 weeks of treatment. Scores were obtained every 2 weeks for 8 weeks. The total sum score of the 17 items is used to assess depressive severity. Possible total scores range from 0-52, with a higher score indicating greater depressive severity. Scores of 7 or less are indicative of full remission (i.e. no depression). Scores of 8-15 indicate mild depression; scores of 16-25 indicate moderate depression; scores of 25 or greater indicate severe depression. Mixed model repeated measures analysis (MMRM) was used to examine treatment group effect on changes from baseline to week 8 in Hamilton D scores. Models included subjects as a random effect, and treatment group and study week as fixed effects. An auto-regressive covariance structure was used because it provided the best fit to the data. Site and baseline score were included as covariates in all models.

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: We randomized 196 of 389 screened patients. Nineteen subjects dropped out before completing at least one post-baseline visit, leaving 177 evaluable subjects

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Eicosapentaenoic Acid (EPA)Score on a Depression Severity Rating Scale Over Eight Weeks-10.34 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.62
Docosahexaenoic Acid (DHA)Score on a Depression Severity Rating Scale Over Eight Weeks-9.26 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.62
PlaceboScore on a Depression Severity Rating Scale Over Eight Weeks-9.49 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.61

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026