Skip to content

Safety/Efficacy Study of Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel in Parkinson's Subjects

Open-Label, 12-Month Safety and Efficacy Study of Levodopa - Carbidopa Intestinal Gel in Levodopa-Responsive Parkinson's Disease Subjects

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00360568
Enrollment
62
Registered
2006-08-04
Start date
2009-06-30
Completion date
2012-10-31
Last updated
2015-01-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dyskinesias, Parkinson's Disease, Severe Motor Fluctuations

Keywords

carbidopa, severe motor fluctuations, intestinal gel, levodopa, efficacy, levodopa carbidopa intestinal gel, dyskinesia, Parkinson's Disease, Duodopa, levodopa-carbidopa, DUOPA

Brief summary

Long term safety and efficacy (12 months) of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel.

Detailed description

Study S187.3.003 (NCT00360568) is a Phase 3, 12-month, open-label, multicenter continuation treatment study of the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) in the treatment of participants with levodopa-responsive Parkinson's disease (PD) with persistent motor fluctuations despite optimized treatment with available PD medications. All participants received LCIG. Only participants who completed 12 weeks of double-blind, double-dummy treatment in Study S187.3.001 or S187.3.002 (NCT00357994/ NCT00660387) qualified for enrollment in this 12-month continuation treatment study.

Interventions

Infusion should be kept within a range of 0.5-10 mL/hour (10-200 mg levodopa/hour) and is usually 2-6 mL/hour (40-120 mg levodopa/hour).

DEVICEPEG tube

percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube

DEVICEJ-tube

jejunal tube

Sponsors

Quintiles, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott)
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) according to United Kingdon Parkinson's Disease Society (UKPDS) Brain Bank Criteria * Levodopa-responsive with severe motor fluctuations * Completion of protocol S187.3.001 (NCT00357994) or S187.3.002 (NCT00660387) and continue to meet the inclusion criteria for the preceding study

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with medically relevant abnormal findings (labs, electrocardiogram \[ECG\], physical examination, adverse events, psychiatric, neurological or behavioral disorders, etc.) at end of the double-blind phase (Week 12) of Study S187.3.001 (NCT00357994) or Study S187.3.002 (NCT00660387)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEsFrom study enrollment to the end of study or early termination of treatment, including the removal of PEG-J, plus 30 days.AE=any untoward medical occurrence which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that: results in death; is life-threatening (an event in which the subject was at risk of death at the time of the event); requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or other important medical events. Treatment-emergent events (TEAE or TESAE)=those starting after the first dose of study drug. Severe=severity reported as 'severe' or missing. Possibly or Probably Treatment Related=drug-event relationship reported as 'possible', 'probable' or missing. Death=a fatal outcome of an SAE or AE.
Number of Participants With Device Complications12 monthsComplications of the infusion device were collected. Pump, intestinal tube, PEG, stoma, and other complications included (but were not limited to) device breakage, device leakage, device malfunction, device misuse, device occlusion, intentional and unintentional device removal by participant, complication of device insertion, device dislocation, device breakage, device dislocation, and device site reaction.
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology Parameters12 monthsTerms abbreviated in the table include females (f) and males (m).
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry Parameters12 monthsTerms abbreviated in the table include upper limit of normal (ULN), male (m), and female (f).
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign Parameters12 monthsTerms abbreviated in the table include supine systolic blood pressure (SuSBP), standing systolic blood pressure (StSBP), orthostatic systolic blood pressure (OSBP), supine diastolic blood pressure (SuDBP), standing diastolic blood pressure (StDBP), orthostatic diastolic blood pressure (ODBP), supine pulse (SuP) in beats per minute (bpm), standing pulse (StP), and body temperature (Temp). Increase and decrease are signified by ↑ and ↓, respectively.
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters12 monthsTerms abbreviated in the table include heart rate (HR) in beats per minute (bpm), PR interval (PRI), QT interval corrected for heart rate using Bazett's formula (QTcB), and QT interval corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula (QTcF). Increase and decrease are signified by ↑ and ↓, respectively.
Number of Participants With Sleep Attacks at Baseline and EndpointBaseline, Endpoint (Month 12 or last post-baseline visit)To prospectively monitor for the possible development of sleep attacks, participants were asked if they had experienced any events in which they fell asleep suddenly or unexpectedly, including while engaged in some activity (e.g., eating/drinking, speaking, or driving) or at rest, with or without any previous warning of sleepiness.
Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and Post-baseline (PBL)Baseline, Post-baseline (up to Month 12)The MIDI is a validated assessment of impulsive behavior consisting of a semistructured clinical interview assessing pathological gambling, trichotillomania (compulsive hair-pulling), kleptomania (compulsive stealing), pyromania (compulsive fire-setting), intermittent explosive disorder, compulsive buying, and compulsive sexual behavior.
Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Total Score at EndpointBaseline, Endpoint (Month 12 or last post-baseline visit)The AIMS is an investigator-completed rating scale that has a total of 12 items rating involuntary movements of various areas of the participant's body. Items 1 through 10 are rated on a 5-point scale of severity from 0 (none), 1 (minimal), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), to 4 (severe), and items 11 and 12 are yes/no questions concerning problems with teeth or dentures. The total AIMS score was calculated by summing items 1-10, with a possible range of 0-40; a negative change indicates improvement. The AIMS was to be performed at consistent times, when the subject was experiencing his/her worst On time (dyskinesia \[involuntary muscle movement\]).
Number of Participants With Confirmed Cases of Melanomaup to Month 12A comprehensive assessment for the presence of melanoma was performed during the screening period and at early termination/end of study by a dermatologist experienced with the diagnosis of the condition. If a suspicious lesion was present, a biopsy was obtained for proper diagnosis.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Neurological Examination Findingsup to 12 monthsThe neurologic examination was to be done during On time. The neurological examination assessed: cranial nerves - assessment of cranial nerves II - XII, excluding fundoscopic examination; motor system - assessment of tone, strength, and abnormal movements; sensory system - including light touch, pinprick, joint position, and vibratory sense; reflexes - assessment of deep tendon reflexes and plantar responses (Babinski sign); coordination - assessment of upper and lower extremities; gait - assessment of base and tandem gait; station - assessment of posture and stability.
Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Findingsup to 12 monthsThe Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) is a systematically administered instrument developed to track suicidal adverse events across a treatment study. The instrument is designed to assess suicidal behavior and ideation, track and assess all suicidal events, as well as the lethality of attempts. Suicidal ideation categories include the following: wish to be dead; nonspecific active suicidal thoughts; active suicidal ideation without intent to act; active suicidal ideation with some intent to act but no plan; active suicidal ideation with plan and intent. Suicidal behavior categories include the following: actual attempt; interrupted attempt; aborted attempt; preparatory acts or behavior; suicidal behavior; completed suicide.
Number of Participants Taking at Least 1 Concomitant Medication During the Study12 monthsConcomitant medications include medications started on or after the first open-label LCIG infusion as well as medications started prior to the first open-label infusion but continued during the study.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Stigma Domain Score at EndpointBaseline, Endpoint (Month 12 or last post-baseline visit)The PDQ-39 is a self-administered questionnaire which comprises 39 items addressing 8 domains of health in Parkinson's disease patients. The PDQ-39 Domain: Stigma (e.g., social embarrassment) consists of 4 questions, each answered on a 5-point scale. The domain scores are calculated by first summing the answers to the questions in the domain. The sum is divided by the highest score possible (i.e., number of answers multiplied by 4) and the quotient is multiplied by 100 to put the score on a scale from 0 to 100, where lower scores indicate a better perceived health status. Higher scores are consistently associated with the more severe symptoms of the disease such as tremor and stiffness.
Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Social Support Domain Score at EndpointBaseline, Endpoint (Month 12 or last post-baseline visit)The PDQ-39 is a self-administered questionnaire which comprises 39 items addressing 8 domains of health in Parkinson's disease patients. The PDQ-39 Domain: Social Support includes 3 questions, each answered on a 5-point scale. The domain scores are calculated by first summing the answers to the questions in the domain. The sum is divided by the highest score possible (i.e., number of answers multiplied by 4) and the quotient is multiplied by 100 to put the score on a scale from 0 to 100, where lower scores indicate a better perceived health status. Higher scores are consistently associated with the more severe symptoms of the disease such as tremor and stiffness.
Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Cognition Domain Score at EndpointBaseline, Endpoint (Month 12 or last post-baseline visit)The PDQ-39 is a self-administered questionnaire which comprises 39 items addressing 8 domains of health in Parkinson's disease patients. The PDQ-39 Domain: Cognition includes 4 questions, each answered on a 5-point scale. The domain scores are calculated by first summing the answers to the questions in the domain. The sum is divided by the highest score possible (i.e., number of answers multiplied by 4) and the quotient is multiplied by 100 to put the score on a scale from 0 to 100, where lower scores indicate a better perceived health status. Higher scores are consistently associated with the more severe symptoms of the disease such as tremor and stiffness.
Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Communication Domain Score at EndpointBaseline, Endpoint (Month 12 or last post-baseline visit)The PDQ-39 is a self-administered questionnaire which comprises 39 items addressing 8 domains of health in Parkinson's disease patients. The PDQ-39 Domain: Communication includes 3 questions, each answered on a 5-point scale. The domain scores are calculated by first summing the answers to the questions in the domain. The sum is divided by the highest score possible (i.e., number of answers multiplied by 4) and the quotient is multiplied by 100 to put the score on a scale from 0 to 100, where lower scores indicate a better perceived health status. Higher scores are consistently associated with the more severe symptoms of the disease such as tremor and stiffness.
Change From Baseline in Average Daily Off Time at EndpointBaseline, Endpoint (Month 12 or last post-baseline visit)Based on the Parkinson's Disease Symptom Diary. On time is when PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Off time is when PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. The diary is completed every 30 minutes for the full 24 hours of each of 3 days prior to selected clinic visits. It reflects both time awake and time asleep. Daily totals are normalized to a 16-hour scale (i.e. 16 hours of awake time). The normalized totals for the 3 days prior to the visit are averaged for the analysis. Negative change from baseline for off time indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life Scale (EQ-5D) Summary Index at EndpointBaseline, Endpoint (Month 12 or last post-baseline visit)The EQ-5D is a participant answered questionnaire scoring 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. EQ-5D health states, defined by the EQ-5D descriptive system, are converted into a single summary index by applying a formula that essentially attaches values (also called QOL weights or QOL utilities) to each of the levels in each dimension. EQ-5D Summary Index values range from -0.11 to 1.00 with positive change indicating improvement.
Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life Scale (EQ-5D) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at EndpointBaseline, Endpoint (Month 12 or last post-baseline visit)The EQ-5D VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a scale from 0-100 where 100 is the 'best imaginable health state' and 0 is the 'worst imaginable health state.'
Change From Baseline in Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) Total Score at EndpointBaseline, Endpoint (Month 12 months or last post-baseline visit)The ZBI is a 22-item questionnaire regarding the caregiver/subject relationship and evaluates the caregiver's health condition, psychological well-being, finances and social life. Each question is answered on a 5-point scale (0=never, 1=rarely, 2=sometimes, 3=quite frequently, and 4=nearly always). The caregiver burden is evaluated by the total score (range 0 to 88) obtained from the sum of the answers to the 22 questions. Higher scores are associated with a higher level of burden for the caregiver.
Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Bodily Discomfort Domain Score at EndpointBaseline, Endpoint (Month 12 or last post-baseline visit)The PDQ-39 is a self-administered questionnaire which comprises 39 items addressing 8 domains of health in Parkinson's disease patients. The PDQ-39 Domain: Bodily Discomfort includes 3 questions, each answered on a 5-point scale. The domain scores are calculated by first summing the answers to the questions in the domain. The sum is divided by the highest score possible (i.e., number of answers multiplied by 4) and the quotient is multiplied by 100 to put the score on a scale from 0 to 100, where lower scores indicate a better perceived health status. Higher scores are consistently associated with the more severe symptoms of the disease such as tremor and stiffness.
Change From Baseline in Average Daily Normalized On Time With Troublesome Dyskinesia at EndpointBaseline, Endpoint (Month 12 or last post-baseline visit)Based on the Parkinson's Disease Symptom Diary. On time is when PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Off time is when PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. The diary is completed every 30 minutes for the full 24 hours of each of 3 days prior to selected clinic visits. It reflects both time awake and time asleep. Daily totals are normalized to a 16-hour scale (i.e. 16 hours of awake time). The normalized totals for the 3 days prior to the visit are averaged for the analysis.
Change From Baseline in Average Daily On Time Without Troublesome Dyskinesia at Month 12Baseline, Endpoint (Month 12 or last post-baseline visit)Based on the Parkinson's Disease Symptom Diary. On time is when PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Off time is when PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. On time without troublesome dyskinesia (involuntary muscle movement) is defined as on time without dyskinesia and on time with non-troublesome dyskinesia. The diary is completed every 30 minutes for the full 24 hours of each of 3 days prior to selected clinic visits. It reflects both time awake and time asleep. Daily totals are normalized to a 16-hour scale (i.e. 16 hours of awake time). The normalized totals for the 3 days prior to the visit are averaged for the analysis. Positive change from Baseline for on time without troublesome dyskinesia indicates improvement.
Clinical Global Impression - Status (CGI-S) Score at Baseline and Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Score at EndpointBaseline, Endpoint (Month 12 or last post-baseline visit)The CGI-S is a global assessment by the Investigator of current symptomatology and impact of illness on functioning. The ratings of the CGI-S are as follows: 1 = normal, 2 = borderline ill, 3 = mildly ill, 4 = moderately ill, 5 = markedly ill, 6 = severely ill, and 7 = among the most extremely ill. The CGI-I is a global assessment by the Investigator of the change in clinical status since the start of treatment. The CGI-I ratings are as follows: 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, 7 = very much worse.
Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part I Score at EndpointBaseline, Endpoint (Month 12 or last post-baseline visit)The UPDRS is an Investigator-used rating tool to follow the longitudinal course of Parkinson's disease. The Part I Score is the sum of the answers to the 4 questions that comprise Part I, each of which are measured on a 5-point scale (0-4). The Part I score ranges from 0-16 and higher scores are associated with more disability.
Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part II Score at EndpointBaseline, Endpoint (Month 12 or last post-baseline visit)The UPDRS is an Investigator-used rating tool to follow the longitudinal course of Parkinson's disease. The Part II score is the sum of the answers to the 13 questions that comprise Part II, each of which are measured on a 5-point scale (0-4). The Part II score ranges from 0-52 and higher scores are associated with more disability.
Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Score at EndpointBaseline, Endpoint (Month 12 or last post-baseline visit)The UPDRS is an Investigator-used rating tool to follow the longitudinal course of Parkinson's disease. The Part III score is the sum of the 27 answers provided to the 14 Part III questions, each of which are measured on a 5-point scale (0-4). The Part III score ranges from 0-108 and higher scores are associated with more disability.
Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Total Score at EndpointBaseline, Endpoint (Month 12 or last post-baseline visit)The UPDRS is an Investigator-used rating tool to follow the longitudinal course of Parkinson's disease. The total score is the sum of the responses to the 31 questions (44 answers) that comprise Parts I-III of the scale. The total score will range from 0-176, with 176 representing the worst (total) disability, and 0 representing no disability.
Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part IV Score at EndpointBaseline, Endpoint (Month 12 or last post-baseline visit)The UPDRS is an Investigator-used rating tool to follow the longitudinal course of Parkinson's disease. The Part IV Score is the sum of the answers to the 11 questions that comprise Part IV, each of which are measured on a 5-point scale (0-4) or a 2-point scale (0 or 1). The Part IV score ranges from 0-23 and higher scores are associated with more disability.
Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Summary Index at EndpointBaseline, Endpoint (Month 12 or last post-baseline visit)The PDQ-39 is a self-administered questionnaire which comprises 39 items addressing 8 domains of health in Parkinson's disease patients. These include: mobility, activities of daily living, emotional well-being, stigma, social support, cognition, communication, and bodily discomfort. The PDQ-39 Summary Index is the sum of all answers divided by the highest score possible (i.e. number of answers multiplied by 4) which is multiplied by 100 to put the score on a 0-100 scale. Higher scores are associated with more severe symptoms.
Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Mobility Domain Score at EndpointBaseline, Endpoint (Month 12 or last post-baseline visit)The PDQ-39 is a self-administered questionnaire which comprises 39 items addressing 8 domains of health in Parkinson's disease patients. The PDQ-39 Domain: Mobility (e.g., fear of falling when walking) includes 10 questions, each answered on a 5-point scale. The domain scores are calculated by first summing the answers to the questions in the domain. The sum is divided by the highest score possible (i.e., number of answers multiplied by 4) and the quotient is multiplied by 100 to put the score on a scale from 0 to 100, where lower scores indicate a better perceived health status. Higher scores are consistently associated with the more severe symptoms of the disease such as tremor and stiffness.
Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Activities of Daily Living Domain Score at EndpointBaseline, Endpoint (Month 12 or last post-baseline visit)The PDQ-39 is a self-administered questionnaire which comprises 39 items addressing 8 domains of health in Parkinson's disease patients. The PDQ-39 Domain: Activities of Daily Living (e.g., difficulty cutting food) includes 6 questions, each answered on a 5-point scale. The domain scores are calculated by first summing the answers to the questions in the domain. The sum is divided by the highest score possible (i.e., number of answers multiplied by 4) and the quotient is multiplied by 100 to put the score on a scale from 0 to 100, where lower scores indicate a better perceived health status. Higher scores are consistently associated with the more severe symptoms of the disease such as tremor and stiffness.
Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Emotional Well-Being Domain Score at EndpointBaseline, Endpoint (Month 12 or last post-baseline visit)The PDQ-39 is a self-administered questionnaire which comprises 39 items addressing 8 domains of health in Parkinson's disease patients. The PDQ-39 Domain: Emotional Well-being (e.g., feelings of isolation) includes 6 questions, each answered on a 5-point scale. The domain scores are calculated by first summing the answers to the questions in the domain. The sum is divided by the highest score possible (i.e., number of answers multiplied by 4) and the quotient is multiplied by 100 to put the score on a scale from 0 to 100, where lower scores indicate a better perceived health status. Higher scores are consistently associated with the more severe symptoms of the disease such as tremor and stiffness.

Countries

Germany, New Zealand, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)
All participants received LCIG, delivered through a PEG-J, administered for up to 12 months (52 weeks). Starting dose of LCIG was based on the optimized oral levodopa-carbidopa dose that the participant was receiving just prior to randomization in Study S187.3.001 (NCT00357994) and Study S187.3.002 (NCT00660387), administered in the morning of the first day following Study Day 86 of these previous studies. The LCIG infusion was expected to infuse over approximately16 hours each day with a rate of infusion within the range of 1 to 10 mL/hour (20 to 200 mg of levodopa/hour) in most instances. In NCT00357994/NCT00660387 (previous study), these participants received double-blind, double-dummy treatment with LCIG + Placebo Capsules.
33
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)
All participants received LCIG, delivered through a PEG-J, administered for up to 12 months (52 weeks). Starting dose of LCIG was based on the optimized oral levodopa-carbidopa dose that the participant was receiving just prior to randomization in Study S187.3.001 (NCT00357994) and Study S187.3.002 (NCT00660387), administered in the morning of the first day following Study Day 86 of the previous studies. The LCIG infusion was expected to infuse over approximately16 hours each day with a rate of infusion within the range of 1 to 10 mL/hour (20 to 200 mg of levodopa/hour) in most instances. In NCT00357994/NCT00660387 (previous study), these participants received double-blind, double-dummy treatment with Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules.
29
Total62

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event12
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject03

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Total
Age, Continuous63.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
64.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6
64.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.9
Age, Customized
<65 years
19 participants13 participants32 participants
Age, Customized
>=65 years
14 participants16 participants30 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants8 Participants18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
23 Participants21 Participants44 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
29 / 3326 / 2955 / 62
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 339 / 2914 / 62

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Total Score at Endpoint

The AIMS is an investigator-completed rating scale that has a total of 12 items rating involuntary movements of various areas of the participant's body. Items 1 through 10 are rated on a 5-point scale of severity from 0 (none), 1 (minimal), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), to 4 (severe), and items 11 and 12 are yes/no questions concerning problems with teeth or dentures. The total AIMS score was calculated by summing items 1-10, with a possible range of 0-40; a negative change indicates improvement. The AIMS was to be performed at consistent times, when the subject was experiencing his/her worst On time (dyskinesia \[involuntary muscle movement\]).

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (Month 12 or last post-baseline visit)

Population: Safety Data Set: all enrolled participants who received at least one study S187.3.003 LCIG infusion; n=number of participants with assessment at timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Total Score at EndpointBaseline; n=33, 29, 626.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Total Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint; n=33, 27, 606.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Total Score at EndpointBaseline; n=33, 29, 625.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.3
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Total Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint; n=33, 27, 605.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.3
LCIG (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Total Score at EndpointBaseline; n=33, 29, 625.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.1
LCIG (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Total Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint; n=33, 27, 605.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.1
Primary

Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Findings

The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) is a systematically administered instrument developed to track suicidal adverse events across a treatment study. The instrument is designed to assess suicidal behavior and ideation, track and assess all suicidal events, as well as the lethality of attempts. Suicidal ideation categories include the following: wish to be dead; nonspecific active suicidal thoughts; active suicidal ideation without intent to act; active suicidal ideation with some intent to act but no plan; active suicidal ideation with plan and intent. Suicidal behavior categories include the following: actual attempt; interrupted attempt; aborted attempt; preparatory acts or behavior; suicidal behavior; completed suicide.

Time frame: up to 12 months

Population: Safety Data Set: all enrolled participants who received at least one study S187-3-3003 LCIG infusion with a C-SSRS assessment during the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) FindingsParticipants with Suicidal Ideations0 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) FindingsParticipants with Suicidal Ideations Only0 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) FindingsParticipants with Suicidal Behaviors0 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) FindingsParticipants with Suicidal Behaviors or Ideations0 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) FindingsParticipants with Suicidal Behaviors or Ideations0 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) FindingsParticipants with Suicidal Ideations0 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) FindingsParticipants with Suicidal Behaviors0 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) FindingsParticipants with Suicidal Ideations Only0 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) FindingsParticipants with Suicidal Behaviors or Ideations0 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) FindingsParticipants with Suicidal Ideations Only0 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) FindingsParticipants with Suicidal Behaviors0 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) FindingsParticipants with Suicidal Ideations0 participants
Primary

Number of Participants Taking at Least 1 Concomitant Medication During the Study

Concomitant medications include medications started on or after the first open-label LCIG infusion as well as medications started prior to the first open-label infusion but continued during the study.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Safety Data Set: all enrolled participants who received at least one study S187.3.003 LCIG infusion.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants Taking at Least 1 Concomitant Medication During the Study33 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants Taking at Least 1 Concomitant Medication During the Study29 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants Taking at Least 1 Concomitant Medication During the Study62 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEs

AE=any untoward medical occurrence which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that: results in death; is life-threatening (an event in which the subject was at risk of death at the time of the event); requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or other important medical events. Treatment-emergent events (TEAE or TESAE)=those starting after the first dose of study drug. Severe=severity reported as 'severe' or missing. Possibly or Probably Treatment Related=drug-event relationship reported as 'possible', 'probable' or missing. Death=a fatal outcome of an SAE or AE.

Time frame: From study enrollment to the end of study or early termination of treatment, including the removal of PEG-J, plus 30 days.

Population: Safety Data Set: all enrolled participants who received at least one study S187.3.003 LCIG infusion.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEs>=1 TESAE5 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEsNo TEAEs2 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEs>=1 TEAE31 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEs>=1 TEAE Leading to Study Termination1 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEsDeaths0 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEs>=1 Possibly or ProbablyTreatment-Related TEAE28 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEs>=1 SAE5 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEsTE Deaths0 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEs>=1 Severe TEAE5 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEs>=1 TEAE Leading to Study Termination2 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEsDeaths0 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEsTE Deaths0 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEs>=1 SAE9 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEs>=1 TESAE9 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEs>=1 TEAE28 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEs>=1 Severe TEAE10 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEs>=1 Possibly or ProbablyTreatment-Related TEAE20 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEsNo TEAEs1 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEs>=1 SAE14 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEsDeaths0 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEs>=1 Severe TEAE15 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEsTE Deaths0 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEsNo TEAEs3 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEs>=1 TEAE Leading to Study Termination3 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEs>=1 TESAE14 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEs>=1 Possibly or ProbablyTreatment-Related TEAE48 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEs>=1 TEAE59 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Neurological Examination Findings

The neurologic examination was to be done during On time. The neurological examination assessed: cranial nerves - assessment of cranial nerves II - XII, excluding fundoscopic examination; motor system - assessment of tone, strength, and abnormal movements; sensory system - including light touch, pinprick, joint position, and vibratory sense; reflexes - assessment of deep tendon reflexes and plantar responses (Babinski sign); coordination - assessment of upper and lower extremities; gait - assessment of base and tandem gait; station - assessment of posture and stability.

Time frame: up to 12 months

Population: Safety Data Set: all enrolled participants who received at least one study S187.3.003 LCIG infusion and had a neurological examination.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Neurological Examination FindingsMotor System3 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Neurological Examination FindingsCoordination1 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes1 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Neurological Examination FindingsCranial Nerve0 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Neurological Examination FindingsStation2 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Neurological Examination FindingsGait2 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Neurological Examination FindingsSensory System2 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes1 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Neurological Examination FindingsCranial Nerve0 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Neurological Examination FindingsMotor System2 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Neurological Examination FindingsSensory System1 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Neurological Examination FindingsCoordination0 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Neurological Examination FindingsGait2 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Neurological Examination FindingsStation2 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Neurological Examination FindingsCoordination1 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Neurological Examination FindingsMotor System5 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Neurological Examination FindingsStation4 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Neurological Examination FindingsGait4 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes2 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Neurological Examination FindingsSensory System3 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Neurological Examination FindingsCranial Nerve0 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Confirmed Cases of Melanoma

A comprehensive assessment for the presence of melanoma was performed during the screening period and at early termination/end of study by a dermatologist experienced with the diagnosis of the condition. If a suspicious lesion was present, a biopsy was obtained for proper diagnosis.

Time frame: up to Month 12

Population: Safety Data Set: all enrolled participants who received at least one study S187.3.003 LCIG infusion.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Confirmed Cases of Melanoma0 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Confirmed Cases of Melanoma0 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Confirmed Cases of Melanoma0 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Device Complications

Complications of the infusion device were collected. Pump, intestinal tube, PEG, stoma, and other complications included (but were not limited to) device breakage, device leakage, device malfunction, device misuse, device occlusion, intentional and unintentional device removal by participant, complication of device insertion, device dislocation, device breakage, device dislocation, and device site reaction.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Safety Data Set: all enrolled participants who received at least one study S187.3.003 LCIG infusion.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Device Complications>=1 Complication26 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Device ComplicationsPump Complication18 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Device ComplicationsIntestinal Tube Complication15 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Device ComplicationsPEG Complication11 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Device ComplicationsStoma Complication12 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Device ComplicationsOther6 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Device ComplicationsOther4 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Device Complications>=1 Complication24 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Device ComplicationsPEG Complication11 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Device ComplicationsStoma Complication15 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Device ComplicationsPump Complication16 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Device ComplicationsIntestinal Tube Complication16 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Device ComplicationsPump Complication34 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Device ComplicationsIntestinal Tube Complication31 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Device ComplicationsOther10 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Device ComplicationsPEG Complication22 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Device Complications>=1 Complication50 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Device ComplicationsStoma Complication27 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters

Terms abbreviated in the table include heart rate (HR) in beats per minute (bpm), PR interval (PRI), QT interval corrected for heart rate using Bazett's formula (QTcB), and QT interval corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula (QTcF). Increase and decrease are signified by ↑ and ↓, respectively.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Safety Data Set: all enrolled participants who received at least one study S187.3.003 LCIG infusion.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersHR <=50 and >30 bpm ↓ from BL; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersHR >=120 and >30 bpm ↑ from BL; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersPR Interval <120 msec; n=33, 27, 601 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersPR Interval >220 msec; n=33, 27, 601 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersQTcB Interval >480 msec; n=33, 27, 600 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersQTcB Interval >60 msec ↑ from BL; n=33, 27, 600 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersQTcF Interval >480 msec; n=33, 27, 600 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersQTcF Interval >60 msec ↑ from BL; n=33, 27, 600 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersPR Interval <120 msec; n=33, 27, 600 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersQTcF Interval >480 msec; n=33, 27, 600 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersPR Interval >220 msec; n=33, 27, 600 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersQTcB Interval >480 msec; n=33, 27, 600 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersQTcB Interval >60 msec ↑ from BL; n=33, 27, 600 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersHR <=50 and >30 bpm ↓ from BL; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersHR >=120 and >30 bpm ↑ from BL; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersQTcF Interval >60 msec ↑ from BL; n=33, 27, 600 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersPR Interval <120 msec; n=33, 27, 601 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersHR >=120 and >30 bpm ↑ from BL; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersHR <=50 and >30 bpm ↓ from BL; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersPR Interval >220 msec; n=33, 27, 601 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersQTcF Interval >480 msec; n=33, 27, 600 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersQTcB Interval >60 msec ↑ from BL; n=33, 27, 600 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersQTcB Interval >480 msec; n=33, 27, 600 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersQTcF Interval >60 msec ↑ from BL; n=33, 27, 600 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry Parameters

Terms abbreviated in the table include upper limit of normal (ULN), male (m), and female (f).

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Safety Data Set: all enrolled participants who received at least one study S187.3.003 LCIG infusion; n=number of participants with an assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersCreatine Phosphokinase >3x ULN; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersCalcium >3.0 mmol/L; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersAlbumin >70 g/L; n=27, 20, 470 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersAlkaline Phosphatase >400 U/L; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersTotal Protein <45 g/L; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersTriglycerides >5.6 mmol/L; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersLactate dehydrogenase >3x ULN; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersTotal Bilirubin >2xULN; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersUric Acid>500µmol/L(f);>590µmol/L(m);n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersGamma-glutamyl Transpeptidase >3x ULN;n=33, 28, 611 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersAspartate Aminotransferase >3xULN; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersPotassium <3.0 mmol/L; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersAlanine Aminotransferase >3xULN; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersCholesterol >12.9 mmol/L; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersNon-fasting Glucose >16.0 mmol/L; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersPotassium >6.0 mmol/L; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersAlbumin <25 g/L; n=27, 20, 470 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersSodium <126 mmol/L; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersCreatinine >177 µmol/L; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersSodium >156 mmol/L; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersNon-fasting Glucose <2.78 mmol/L; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersCalcium <1.75 mmol/L; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersBlood Urea Nitrogen >10.8 mmol/L; n=28, 22, 503 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersNon-fasting Glucose <2.78 mmol/L; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersSodium <126 mmol/L; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersSodium >156 mmol/L; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersAlbumin <25 g/L; n=27, 20, 470 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersAlbumin >70 g/L; n=27, 20, 470 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersPotassium <3.0 mmol/L; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersPotassium >6.0 mmol/L; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersCreatinine >177 µmol/L; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersCalcium <1.75 mmol/L; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersCalcium >3.0 mmol/L; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersTotal Protein <45 g/L; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersTotal Bilirubin >2xULN; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersAspartate Aminotransferase >3xULN; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersAlanine Aminotransferase >3xULN; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersGamma-glutamyl Transpeptidase >3x ULN;n=33, 28, 611 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersLactate dehydrogenase >3x ULN; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersAlkaline Phosphatase >400 U/L; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersCreatine Phosphokinase >3x ULN; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersNon-fasting Glucose >16.0 mmol/L; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersUric Acid>500µmol/L(f);>590µmol/L(m);n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersBlood Urea Nitrogen >10.8 mmol/L; n=28, 22, 500 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersCholesterol >12.9 mmol/L; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersTriglycerides >5.6 mmol/L; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersBlood Urea Nitrogen >10.8 mmol/L; n=28, 22, 503 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersAlkaline Phosphatase >400 U/L; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersCalcium <1.75 mmol/L; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersSodium >156 mmol/L; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersCreatine Phosphokinase >3x ULN; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersCreatinine >177 µmol/L; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersPotassium >6.0 mmol/L; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersNon-fasting Glucose <2.78 mmol/L; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersPotassium <3.0 mmol/L; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersTriglycerides >5.6 mmol/L; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersNon-fasting Glucose >16.0 mmol/L; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersAlbumin >70 g/L; n=27, 20, 470 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersCholesterol >12.9 mmol/L; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersAspartate Aminotransferase >3xULN; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersUric Acid>500µmol/L(f);>590µmol/L(m);n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersAlanine Aminotransferase >3xULN; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersTotal Bilirubin >2xULN; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersAlbumin <25 g/L; n=27, 20, 470 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersGamma-glutamyl Transpeptidase >3x ULN;n=33, 28, 612 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersTotal Protein <45 g/L; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersSodium <126 mmol/L; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersLactate dehydrogenase >3x ULN; n=33, 28, 610 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersCalcium >3.0 mmol/L; n=33, 28, 610 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology Parameters

Terms abbreviated in the table include females (f) and males (m).

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Safety Data Set: all enrolled participants who received at least one study S187.3.003 LCIG infusion and had an assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersPlatelet Count <95 10^9/L0 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersNeutrophils, Absolute <1.2 10^9/L0 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersHaematocrit <30% (f); <34% (m)1 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersMonocytes >30%0 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersLymphocytes >80%0 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersHaemoglobin <90 g/L (f); <100 g/L (m)0 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersEosinophils >10%0 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersLymphocytes, Absolute <.75 10^9/L2 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersPlatelet Count >700 10^9/L0 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersWhite Blood Cells <2.8 10^9/L0 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersMean Corpuscular Volume >120 fL0 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersRed Blood Cells <2.0 10^12/L (f); <2.5 10^12/L (m)0 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersWhite Blood Cells >16.0 10^9/L0 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersMean Corpuscular Volume <60 fL0 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersPlatelet Count <95 10^9/L0 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersRed Blood Cells <2.0 10^12/L (f); <2.5 10^12/L (m)0 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersHaemoglobin <90 g/L (f); <100 g/L (m)1 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersHaematocrit <30% (f); <34% (m)1 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersWhite Blood Cells <2.8 10^9/L0 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersWhite Blood Cells >16.0 10^9/L0 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersNeutrophils, Absolute <1.2 10^9/L0 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersLymphocytes >80%0 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersLymphocytes, Absolute <.75 10^9/L0 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersEosinophils >10%0 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersMonocytes >30%0 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersPlatelet Count >700 10^9/L0 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersMean Corpuscular Volume <60 fL0 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersMean Corpuscular Volume >120 fL0 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersMean Corpuscular Volume <60 fL0 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersMonocytes >30%0 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersWhite Blood Cells >16.0 10^9/L0 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersWhite Blood Cells <2.8 10^9/L0 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersPlatelet Count <95 10^9/L0 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersHaematocrit <30% (f); <34% (m)2 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersRed Blood Cells <2.0 10^12/L (f); <2.5 10^12/L (m)0 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersPlatelet Count >700 10^9/L0 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersHaemoglobin <90 g/L (f); <100 g/L (m)1 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersLymphocytes, Absolute <.75 10^9/L2 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersLymphocytes >80%0 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersMean Corpuscular Volume >120 fL0 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersEosinophils >10%0 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersNeutrophils, Absolute <1.2 10^9/L0 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign Parameters

Terms abbreviated in the table include supine systolic blood pressure (SuSBP), standing systolic blood pressure (StSBP), orthostatic systolic blood pressure (OSBP), supine diastolic blood pressure (SuDBP), standing diastolic blood pressure (StDBP), orthostatic diastolic blood pressure (ODBP), supine pulse (SuP) in beats per minute (bpm), standing pulse (StP), and body temperature (Temp). Increase and decrease are signified by ↑ and ↓, respectively.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Safety Data Set: all enrolled participants who received at least one study S187.3.003 LCIG infusion; n=number of participants with assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersSuP >=120 and >30 bpm ↑ from BL; n=33, 29, 620 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersSuDBP >=105 and >30 mm Hg ↑ from BL; n=33, 29, 621 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersSuSBP >=180 and >40 mm Hg ↑ from BL; n=33, 29, 621 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersSuSBP <=90 and >30 mm Hg ↓ from BL; n=33, 29, 623 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersStDBP <=50 and >30 mm Hg ↓ from BL; n=33, 29, 621 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersTemp >=38.3° and >=1.1°C ↑ from BL; n=33, 29, 620 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersSuP <=50 and >30 bpm ↓ from BL; n=33, 29, 621 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersStDBP >=105 and >30 mm Hg ↑ from BL; (n=33,29,62)2 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersStSBP >=180 and >40 mm Hg ↑ from BL; n=33, 29, 620 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersODBP: ↓ >=20 mm Hg Supine to Standing; n=33,29,627 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersWeight >=7% ↑ from BL; n=33, 27, 608 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersStP >=120 and >30 bpm ↑ from BL; n=33, 29, 620 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersOSBP: ↓ >=30 mm Hg Supine to Standing; n=33,29,628 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersWeight <=7% ↓ from BL; n=33, 27, 605 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersStP <=50 and >30 bpm ↓ from BL; n=33, 29, 620 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersSuDBP <=50 and >30 mm Hg ↓ from BL; n=33, 29, 620 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersStSBP <=90 and >30 mm Hg ↓ from BL; n=33, 29, 624 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersSuP <=50 and >30 bpm ↓ from BL; n=33, 29, 620 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersSuSBP <=90 and >30 mm Hg ↓ from BL; n=33, 29, 620 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersSuSBP >=180 and >40 mm Hg ↑ from BL; n=33, 29, 622 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersStSBP <=90 and >30 mm Hg ↓ from BL; n=33, 29, 627 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersStSBP >=180 and >40 mm Hg ↑ from BL; n=33, 29, 620 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersOSBP: ↓ >=30 mm Hg Supine to Standing; n=33,29,6211 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersSuDBP <=50 and >30 mm Hg ↓ from BL; n=33, 29, 621 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersSuDBP >=105 and >30 mm Hg ↑ from BL; n=33, 29, 621 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersStDBP <=50 and >30 mm Hg ↓ from BL; n=33, 29, 620 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersStDBP >=105 and >30 mm Hg ↑ from BL; (n=33,29,62)1 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersODBP: ↓ >=20 mm Hg Supine to Standing; n=33,29,627 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersSuP >=120 and >30 bpm ↑ from BL; n=33, 29, 620 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersStP <=50 and >30 bpm ↓ from BL; n=33, 29, 620 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersStP >=120 and >30 bpm ↑ from BL; n=33, 29, 621 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersTemp >=38.3° and >=1.1°C ↑ from BL; n=33, 29, 620 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersWeight <=7% ↓ from BL; n=33, 27, 605 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersWeight >=7% ↑ from BL; n=33, 27, 608 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersSuSBP >=180 and >40 mm Hg ↑ from BL; n=33, 29, 623 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersSuP >=120 and >30 bpm ↑ from BL; n=33, 29, 620 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersOSBP: ↓ >=30 mm Hg Supine to Standing; n=33,29,6219 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersWeight >=7% ↑ from BL; n=33, 27, 6016 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersStP <=50 and >30 bpm ↓ from BL; n=33, 29, 620 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersStSBP >=180 and >40 mm Hg ↑ from BL; n=33, 29, 620 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersWeight <=7% ↓ from BL; n=33, 27, 6010 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersStP >=120 and >30 bpm ↑ from BL; n=33, 29, 621 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersStSBP <=90 and >30 mm Hg ↓ from BL; n=33, 29, 6211 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersSuSBP <=90 and >30 mm Hg ↓ from BL; n=33, 29, 623 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersStDBP >=105 and >30 mm Hg ↑ from BL; (n=33,29,62)3 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersTemp >=38.3° and >=1.1°C ↑ from BL; n=33, 29, 620 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersODBP: ↓ >=20 mm Hg Supine to Standing; n=33,29,6214 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersStDBP <=50 and >30 mm Hg ↓ from BL; n=33, 29, 621 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersSuDBP >=105 and >30 mm Hg ↑ from BL; n=33, 29, 622 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersSuP <=50 and >30 bpm ↓ from BL; n=33, 29, 621 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersSuDBP <=50 and >30 mm Hg ↓ from BL; n=33, 29, 621 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Sleep Attacks at Baseline and Endpoint

To prospectively monitor for the possible development of sleep attacks, participants were asked if they had experienced any events in which they fell asleep suddenly or unexpectedly, including while engaged in some activity (e.g., eating/drinking, speaking, or driving) or at rest, with or without any previous warning of sleepiness.

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (Month 12 or last post-baseline visit)

Population: Safety Data Set: all enrolled participants who received at least one study S187.3.003 LCIG infusion.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Sleep Attacks at Baseline and EndpointParticipants with >=1 Sleep Attacks at Baseline0 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Number of Participants With Sleep Attacks at Baseline and EndpointParticipants with >=1 Sleep Attacks at Endpoint0 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Sleep Attacks at Baseline and EndpointParticipants with >=1 Sleep Attacks at Baseline0 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Number of Participants With Sleep Attacks at Baseline and EndpointParticipants with >=1 Sleep Attacks at Endpoint0 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Sleep Attacks at Baseline and EndpointParticipants with >=1 Sleep Attacks at Baseline0 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Number of Participants With Sleep Attacks at Baseline and EndpointParticipants with >=1 Sleep Attacks at Endpoint0 participants
Primary

Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and Post-baseline (PBL)

The MIDI is a validated assessment of impulsive behavior consisting of a semistructured clinical interview assessing pathological gambling, trichotillomania (compulsive hair-pulling), kleptomania (compulsive stealing), pyromania (compulsive fire-setting), intermittent explosive disorder, compulsive buying, and compulsive sexual behavior.

Time frame: Baseline, Post-baseline (up to Month 12)

Population: Safety Data Set: all enrolled participants who received at least one study S187.3.003 LCIG infusion; n=number of participants with assessment at timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and Post-baseline (PBL)PBL Pyromania; n=33, 27, 600 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and Post-baseline (PBL)BL Compulsive Buying; n=33, 29, 620 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and Post-baseline (PBL)BL Kleptomania; n=33, 29, 620 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and Post-baseline (PBL)PBL Kleptomania; n=33, 27, 600 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and Post-baseline (PBL)BL Compulsive Sexual Behavior; n=33, 29, 620 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and Post-baseline (PBL)BL Trichotillomania; n=33, 29, 620 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and Post-baseline (PBL)PBL Trichotillomania; n=33, 27, 600 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and Post-baseline (PBL)PBL Pathological Gambling; n=33, 27, 600 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and Post-baseline (PBL)PBL Intermittent Explosive Disorder; n=33, 27, 600 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and Post-baseline (PBL)BL Pyromania; n=33, 29, 620 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and Post-baseline (PBL)PBL Compulsive Sexual Behavior; n=33, 27, 602 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and Post-baseline (PBL)BL Pathological Gambling; n=33, 29, 620 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and Post-baseline (PBL)BL Intermittent Explosive Disorder; n=33, 29, 620 participants
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and Post-baseline (PBL)PBL Compulsive Buying; n=33, 27, 601 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and Post-baseline (PBL)PBL Pyromania; n=33, 27, 600 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and Post-baseline (PBL)BL Pathological Gambling; n=33, 29, 620 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and Post-baseline (PBL)BL Trichotillomania; n=33, 29, 620 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and Post-baseline (PBL)BL Kleptomania; n=33, 29, 620 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and Post-baseline (PBL)BL Pyromania; n=33, 29, 620 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and Post-baseline (PBL)BL Intermittent Explosive Disorder; n=33, 29, 620 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and Post-baseline (PBL)BL Compulsive Buying; n=33, 29, 621 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and Post-baseline (PBL)BL Compulsive Sexual Behavior; n=33, 29, 621 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and Post-baseline (PBL)PBL Pathological Gambling; n=33, 27, 600 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and Post-baseline (PBL)PBL Trichotillomania; n=33, 27, 600 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and Post-baseline (PBL)PBL Kleptomania; n=33, 27, 600 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and Post-baseline (PBL)PBL Intermittent Explosive Disorder; n=33, 27, 600 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and Post-baseline (PBL)PBL Compulsive Buying; n=33, 27, 600 participants
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and Post-baseline (PBL)PBL Compulsive Sexual Behavior; n=33, 27, 600 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and Post-baseline (PBL)PBL Compulsive Buying; n=33, 27, 601 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and Post-baseline (PBL)PBL Kleptomania; n=33, 27, 600 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and Post-baseline (PBL)BL Intermittent Explosive Disorder; n=33, 29, 620 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and Post-baseline (PBL)BL Pyromania; n=33, 29, 620 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and Post-baseline (PBL)PBL Pyromania; n=33, 27, 600 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and Post-baseline (PBL)BL Kleptomania; n=33, 29, 620 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and Post-baseline (PBL)BL Pathological Gambling; n=33, 29, 620 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and Post-baseline (PBL)PBL Intermittent Explosive Disorder; n=33, 27, 600 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and Post-baseline (PBL)BL Trichotillomania; n=33, 29, 620 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and Post-baseline (PBL)PBL Pathological Gambling; n=33, 27, 600 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and Post-baseline (PBL)BL Compulsive Sexual Behavior; n=33, 29, 621 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and Post-baseline (PBL)PBL Compulsive Sexual Behavior; n=33, 27, 602 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and Post-baseline (PBL)PBL Trichotillomania; n=33, 27, 600 participants
LCIG (All Participants)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and Post-baseline (PBL)BL Compulsive Buying; n=33, 29, 621 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Average Daily Normalized On Time With Troublesome Dyskinesia at Endpoint

Based on the Parkinson's Disease Symptom Diary. On time is when PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Off time is when PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. The diary is completed every 30 minutes for the full 24 hours of each of 3 days prior to selected clinic visits. It reflects both time awake and time asleep. Daily totals are normalized to a 16-hour scale (i.e. 16 hours of awake time). The normalized totals for the 3 days prior to the visit are averaged for the analysis.

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (Month 12 or last post-baseline visit)

Population: Full Analysis Data Set: all enrolled participants who received at least one study S187.3.003 LCIG infusion and had data for baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Change From Baseline in Average Daily Normalized On Time With Troublesome Dyskinesia at EndpointBaseline1.09 hoursStandard Deviation 2.07
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Change From Baseline in Average Daily Normalized On Time With Troublesome Dyskinesia at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint-0.58 hoursStandard Deviation 2.18
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Change From Baseline in Average Daily Normalized On Time With Troublesome Dyskinesia at EndpointBaseline0.82 hoursStandard Deviation 1.54
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Change From Baseline in Average Daily Normalized On Time With Troublesome Dyskinesia at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint0.15 hoursStandard Deviation 2.17
LCIG (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Average Daily Normalized On Time With Troublesome Dyskinesia at EndpointBaseline0.97 hoursStandard Deviation 1.84
LCIG (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Average Daily Normalized On Time With Troublesome Dyskinesia at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint-0.24 hoursStandard Deviation 2.19
p-value: 0.394t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Average Daily Off Time at Endpoint

Based on the Parkinson's Disease Symptom Diary. On time is when PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Off time is when PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. The diary is completed every 30 minutes for the full 24 hours of each of 3 days prior to selected clinic visits. It reflects both time awake and time asleep. Daily totals are normalized to a 16-hour scale (i.e. 16 hours of awake time). The normalized totals for the 3 days prior to the visit are averaged for the analysis. Negative change from baseline for off time indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (Month 12 or last post-baseline visit)

Population: Full Analysis Data Set: all enrolled participants who received at least one study S187.3.003 LCIG infusion and had data for baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Change From Baseline in Average Daily Off Time at EndpointBaseline2.87 hoursStandard Deviation 2.18
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Change From Baseline in Average Daily Off Time at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint-0.42 hoursStandard Deviation 2.67
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Change From Baseline in Average Daily Off Time at EndpointBaseline5.18 hoursStandard Deviation 2.05
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Change From Baseline in Average Daily Off Time at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint-2.34 hoursStandard Deviation 2.78
LCIG (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Average Daily Off Time at EndpointBaseline3.92 hoursStandard Deviation 2.4
LCIG (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Average Daily Off Time at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint-1.30 hoursStandard Deviation 2.86
p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Average Daily On Time Without Troublesome Dyskinesia at Month 12

Based on the Parkinson's Disease Symptom Diary. On time is when PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Off time is when PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. On time without troublesome dyskinesia (involuntary muscle movement) is defined as on time without dyskinesia and on time with non-troublesome dyskinesia. The diary is completed every 30 minutes for the full 24 hours of each of 3 days prior to selected clinic visits. It reflects both time awake and time asleep. Daily totals are normalized to a 16-hour scale (i.e. 16 hours of awake time). The normalized totals for the 3 days prior to the visit are averaged for the analysis. Positive change from Baseline for on time without troublesome dyskinesia indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (Month 12 or last post-baseline visit)

Population: Full Analysis Data Set: all enrolled participants who received at least one study S187.3.003 LCIG infusion and had data for baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Change From Baseline in Average Daily On Time Without Troublesome Dyskinesia at Month 12Baseline12.04 hoursStandard Deviation 2.42
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Change From Baseline in Average Daily On Time Without Troublesome Dyskinesia at Month 12Change from Baseline at Endpoint1.00 hoursStandard Deviation 2.58
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Change From Baseline in Average Daily On Time Without Troublesome Dyskinesia at Month 12Baseline10.00 hoursStandard Deviation 2.62
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Change From Baseline in Average Daily On Time Without Troublesome Dyskinesia at Month 12Change from Baseline at Endpoint2.19 hoursStandard Deviation 3.7
LCIG (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Average Daily On Time Without Troublesome Dyskinesia at Month 12Baseline11.11 hoursStandard Deviation 2.69
LCIG (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Average Daily On Time Without Troublesome Dyskinesia at Month 12Change from Baseline at Endpoint1.54 hoursStandard Deviation 3.17
p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life Scale (EQ-5D) Summary Index at Endpoint

The EQ-5D is a participant answered questionnaire scoring 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. EQ-5D health states, defined by the EQ-5D descriptive system, are converted into a single summary index by applying a formula that essentially attaches values (also called QOL weights or QOL utilities) to each of the levels in each dimension. EQ-5D Summary Index values range from -0.11 to 1.00 with positive change indicating improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (Month 12 or last post-baseline visit)

Population: Full Analysis Data Set: all enrolled participants who received at least one study S187.3.003 LCIG infusion and had data for baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life Scale (EQ-5D) Summary Index at EndpointBaseline0.778 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.144
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life Scale (EQ-5D) Summary Index at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint-0.009 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.173
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life Scale (EQ-5D) Summary Index at EndpointBaseline0.676 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.158
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life Scale (EQ-5D) Summary Index at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint-0.006 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.22
LCIG (All Participants)Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life Scale (EQ-5D) Summary Index at EndpointBaseline0.733 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.158
LCIG (All Participants)Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life Scale (EQ-5D) Summary Index at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint-0.008 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.193
p-value: 0.759t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life Scale (EQ-5D) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Endpoint

The EQ-5D VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a scale from 0-100 where 100 is the 'best imaginable health state' and 0 is the 'worst imaginable health state.'

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (Month 12 or last post-baseline visit)

Population: Full Analysis Data Set: all enrolled participants who received at least one study S187.3.003 LCIG infusion and had data for baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life Scale (EQ-5D) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at EndpointBaseline76.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.2
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life Scale (EQ-5D) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.1
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life Scale (EQ-5D) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint4.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.5
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life Scale (EQ-5D) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at EndpointBaseline62.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22
LCIG (All Participants)Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life Scale (EQ-5D) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at EndpointBaseline70.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.2
LCIG (All Participants)Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life Scale (EQ-5D) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint1.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.4
p-value: 0.459t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Activities of Daily Living Domain Score at Endpoint

The PDQ-39 is a self-administered questionnaire which comprises 39 items addressing 8 domains of health in Parkinson's disease patients. The PDQ-39 Domain: Activities of Daily Living (e.g., difficulty cutting food) includes 6 questions, each answered on a 5-point scale. The domain scores are calculated by first summing the answers to the questions in the domain. The sum is divided by the highest score possible (i.e., number of answers multiplied by 4) and the quotient is multiplied by 100 to put the score on a scale from 0 to 100, where lower scores indicate a better perceived health status. Higher scores are consistently associated with the more severe symptoms of the disease such as tremor and stiffness.

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (Month 12 or last post-baseline visit)

Population: Full Analysis Data Set: all enrolled participants who received at least one study S187.3.003 LCIG infusion and had data for baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Activities of Daily Living Domain Score at EndpointBaseline25.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.8
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Activities of Daily Living Domain Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Activities of Daily Living Domain Score at EndpointBaseline39.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.3
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Activities of Daily Living Domain Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint-6.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.9
LCIG (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Activities of Daily Living Domain Score at EndpointBaseline31.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.1
LCIG (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Activities of Daily Living Domain Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint-2.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.1
p-value: 0.22t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Bodily Discomfort Domain Score at Endpoint

The PDQ-39 is a self-administered questionnaire which comprises 39 items addressing 8 domains of health in Parkinson's disease patients. The PDQ-39 Domain: Bodily Discomfort includes 3 questions, each answered on a 5-point scale. The domain scores are calculated by first summing the answers to the questions in the domain. The sum is divided by the highest score possible (i.e., number of answers multiplied by 4) and the quotient is multiplied by 100 to put the score on a scale from 0 to 100, where lower scores indicate a better perceived health status. Higher scores are consistently associated with the more severe symptoms of the disease such as tremor and stiffness.

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (Month 12 or last post-baseline visit)

Population: Full Analysis Data Set: all enrolled participants who received at least one study S187.3.003 LCIG infusion and had data for baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Bodily Discomfort Domain Score at EndpointEndpoint32.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.8
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Bodily Discomfort Domain Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint-2.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.8
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Bodily Discomfort Domain Score at EndpointEndpoint34.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.9
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Bodily Discomfort Domain Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint1.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.5
LCIG (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Bodily Discomfort Domain Score at EndpointEndpoint33.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.4
LCIG (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Bodily Discomfort Domain Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint-1.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19
p-value: 0.65t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Cognition Domain Score at Endpoint

The PDQ-39 is a self-administered questionnaire which comprises 39 items addressing 8 domains of health in Parkinson's disease patients. The PDQ-39 Domain: Cognition includes 4 questions, each answered on a 5-point scale. The domain scores are calculated by first summing the answers to the questions in the domain. The sum is divided by the highest score possible (i.e., number of answers multiplied by 4) and the quotient is multiplied by 100 to put the score on a scale from 0 to 100, where lower scores indicate a better perceived health status. Higher scores are consistently associated with the more severe symptoms of the disease such as tremor and stiffness.

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (Month 12 or last post-baseline visit)

Population: Full Analysis Data Set: all enrolled participants who received at least one study S187.3.003 LCIG infusion and had data for baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Cognition Domain Score at EndpointBaseline15.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.1
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Cognition Domain Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint1.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.3
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Cognition Domain Score at EndpointBaseline24.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.9
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Cognition Domain Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint3.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.7
LCIG (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Cognition Domain Score at EndpointBaseline19.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.9
LCIG (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Cognition Domain Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint2.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.4
p-value: 0.258t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Communication Domain Score at Endpoint

The PDQ-39 is a self-administered questionnaire which comprises 39 items addressing 8 domains of health in Parkinson's disease patients. The PDQ-39 Domain: Communication includes 3 questions, each answered on a 5-point scale. The domain scores are calculated by first summing the answers to the questions in the domain. The sum is divided by the highest score possible (i.e., number of answers multiplied by 4) and the quotient is multiplied by 100 to put the score on a scale from 0 to 100, where lower scores indicate a better perceived health status. Higher scores are consistently associated with the more severe symptoms of the disease such as tremor and stiffness.

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (Month 12 or last post-baseline visit)

Population: Full Analysis Data Set: all enrolled participants who received at least one study S187.3.003 LCIG infusion and had data for baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Communication Domain Score at EndpointBaseline15.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.3
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Communication Domain Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint8.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.4
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Communication Domain Score at EndpointBaseline31.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.2
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Communication Domain Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint-1.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.3
LCIG (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Communication Domain Score at EndpointBaseline22.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21
LCIG (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Communication Domain Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint3.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.7
p-value: 0.104t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Emotional Well-Being Domain Score at Endpoint

The PDQ-39 is a self-administered questionnaire which comprises 39 items addressing 8 domains of health in Parkinson's disease patients. The PDQ-39 Domain: Emotional Well-being (e.g., feelings of isolation) includes 6 questions, each answered on a 5-point scale. The domain scores are calculated by first summing the answers to the questions in the domain. The sum is divided by the highest score possible (i.e., number of answers multiplied by 4) and the quotient is multiplied by 100 to put the score on a scale from 0 to 100, where lower scores indicate a better perceived health status. Higher scores are consistently associated with the more severe symptoms of the disease such as tremor and stiffness.

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (Month 12 or last post-baseline visit)

Population: Full Analysis Data Set: all enrolled participants who received at least one study S187.3.003 LCIG infusion and had data for baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Emotional Well-Being Domain Score at EndpointBaseline20.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.3
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Emotional Well-Being Domain Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint4.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.4
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Emotional Well-Being Domain Score at EndpointBaseline26.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.2
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Emotional Well-Being Domain Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint1.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.1
LCIG (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Emotional Well-Being Domain Score at EndpointBaseline22.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.1
LCIG (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Emotional Well-Being Domain Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint3.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.1
p-value: 0.174t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Mobility Domain Score at Endpoint

The PDQ-39 is a self-administered questionnaire which comprises 39 items addressing 8 domains of health in Parkinson's disease patients. The PDQ-39 Domain: Mobility (e.g., fear of falling when walking) includes 10 questions, each answered on a 5-point scale. The domain scores are calculated by first summing the answers to the questions in the domain. The sum is divided by the highest score possible (i.e., number of answers multiplied by 4) and the quotient is multiplied by 100 to put the score on a scale from 0 to 100, where lower scores indicate a better perceived health status. Higher scores are consistently associated with the more severe symptoms of the disease such as tremor and stiffness.

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (Month 12 or last post-baseline visit)

Population: Full Analysis Data Set: all enrolled participants who received at least one study S187.3.003 LCIG infusion and had data for baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Mobility Domain Score at EndpointBaseline27.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.1
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Mobility Domain Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint2.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.5
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Mobility Domain Score at EndpointBaseline43.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.4
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Mobility Domain Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint-8.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.6
LCIG (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Mobility Domain Score at EndpointBaseline34.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.8
LCIG (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Mobility Domain Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint-2.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.7
p-value: 0.341t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Social Support Domain Score at Endpoint

The PDQ-39 is a self-administered questionnaire which comprises 39 items addressing 8 domains of health in Parkinson's disease patients. The PDQ-39 Domain: Social Support includes 3 questions, each answered on a 5-point scale. The domain scores are calculated by first summing the answers to the questions in the domain. The sum is divided by the highest score possible (i.e., number of answers multiplied by 4) and the quotient is multiplied by 100 to put the score on a scale from 0 to 100, where lower scores indicate a better perceived health status. Higher scores are consistently associated with the more severe symptoms of the disease such as tremor and stiffness.

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (Month 12 or last post-baseline visit)

Population: Full Analysis Data Set: all enrolled participants who received at least one study S187.3.003 LCIG infusion and had data for baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Social Support Domain Score at EndpointBaseline11.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.2
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Social Support Domain Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint1.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.2
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Social Support Domain Score at EndpointBaseline17.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.8
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Social Support Domain Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint-2.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.5
LCIG (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Social Support Domain Score at EndpointBaseline14.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18
LCIG (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Social Support Domain Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.5
p-value: 0.922t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Stigma Domain Score at Endpoint

The PDQ-39 is a self-administered questionnaire which comprises 39 items addressing 8 domains of health in Parkinson's disease patients. The PDQ-39 Domain: Stigma (e.g., social embarrassment) consists of 4 questions, each answered on a 5-point scale. The domain scores are calculated by first summing the answers to the questions in the domain. The sum is divided by the highest score possible (i.e., number of answers multiplied by 4) and the quotient is multiplied by 100 to put the score on a scale from 0 to 100, where lower scores indicate a better perceived health status. Higher scores are consistently associated with the more severe symptoms of the disease such as tremor and stiffness.

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (Month 12 or last post-baseline visit)

Population: Full Analysis Data Set: all enrolled participants who received at least one study S187.3.003 LCIG infusion and had data for baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Stigma Domain Score at EndpointBaseline16.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.3
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Stigma Domain Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.2
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Stigma Domain Score at EndpointBaseline23.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Stigma Domain Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint-6.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.7
LCIG (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Stigma Domain Score at EndpointBaseline19.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.5
LCIG (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Stigma Domain Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint-2.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18
p-value: 0.259t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Summary Index at Endpoint

The PDQ-39 is a self-administered questionnaire which comprises 39 items addressing 8 domains of health in Parkinson's disease patients. These include: mobility, activities of daily living, emotional well-being, stigma, social support, cognition, communication, and bodily discomfort. The PDQ-39 Summary Index is the sum of all answers divided by the highest score possible (i.e. number of answers multiplied by 4) which is multiplied by 100 to put the score on a 0-100 scale. Higher scores are associated with more severe symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (Month 12 or last post-baseline visit)

Population: Full Analysis Data Set: all enrolled participants who received at least one study S187.3.003 LCIG infusion and had data for baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Summary Index at EndpointBaseline22.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.3
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Summary Index at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint1.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.7
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Summary Index at EndpointBaseline32.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Summary Index at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint-3.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.4
LCIG (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Summary Index at EndpointBaseline26.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.8
LCIG (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Summary Index at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint-0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.2
p-value: 0.67t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Score at Endpoint

The UPDRS is an Investigator-used rating tool to follow the longitudinal course of Parkinson's disease. The Part III score is the sum of the 27 answers provided to the 14 Part III questions, each of which are measured on a 5-point scale (0-4). The Part III score ranges from 0-108 and higher scores are associated with more disability.

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (Month 12 or last post-baseline visit)

Population: Full Analysis Data Set: all enrolled participants who received at least one study S187.3.003 LCIG infusion and had data for baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Score at EndpointBaseline16.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.7
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint1.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Score at EndpointBaseline19.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.5
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint-0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.4
LCIG (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Score at EndpointBaseline17.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.8
LCIG (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.6
p-value: 0.571t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part II Score at Endpoint

The UPDRS is an Investigator-used rating tool to follow the longitudinal course of Parkinson's disease. The Part II score is the sum of the answers to the 13 questions that comprise Part II, each of which are measured on a 5-point scale (0-4). The Part II score ranges from 0-52 and higher scores are associated with more disability.

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (Month 12 or last post-baseline visit)

Population: Full Analysis Data Set: all enrolled participants who received at least one study S187.3.003 LCIG infusion and had data for baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part II Score at EndpointBaseline8.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.5
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part II Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.4
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part II Score at EndpointBaseline12.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part II Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint-1.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7
LCIG (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part II Score at EndpointBaseline10.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.9
LCIG (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part II Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.3
p-value: 0.766t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part I Score at Endpoint

The UPDRS is an Investigator-used rating tool to follow the longitudinal course of Parkinson's disease. The Part I Score is the sum of the answers to the 4 questions that comprise Part I, each of which are measured on a 5-point scale (0-4). The Part I score ranges from 0-16 and higher scores are associated with more disability.

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (Month 12 or last post-baseline visit)

Population: Full Analysis Data Set: all enrolled participants who received at least one study S187.3.003 LCIG infusion and had data for baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part I Score at EndpointBaseline1.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part I Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part I Score at EndpointBaseline1.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part I Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
LCIG (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part I Score at EndpointBaseline1.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
LCIG (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part I Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
p-value: 0.055t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part IV Score at Endpoint

The UPDRS is an Investigator-used rating tool to follow the longitudinal course of Parkinson's disease. The Part IV Score is the sum of the answers to the 11 questions that comprise Part IV, each of which are measured on a 5-point scale (0-4) or a 2-point scale (0 or 1). The Part IV score ranges from 0-23 and higher scores are associated with more disability.

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (Month 12 or last post-baseline visit)

Population: Full Analysis Data Set: all enrolled participants who received at least one study S187.3.003 LCIG infusion and had data for baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part IV Score at EndpointBaseline5.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part IV Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint-1.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part IV Score at EndpointBaseline7.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part IV Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint-1.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
LCIG (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part IV Score at EndpointBaseline6.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
LCIG (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part IV Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint-1.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Total Score at Endpoint

The UPDRS is an Investigator-used rating tool to follow the longitudinal course of Parkinson's disease. The total score is the sum of the responses to the 31 questions (44 answers) that comprise Parts I-III of the scale. The total score will range from 0-176, with 176 representing the worst (total) disability, and 0 representing no disability.

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (Month 12 or last post-baseline visit)

Population: Full Analysis Data Set: all enrolled participants who received at least one study S187.3.003 LCIG infusion and had data for baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Total Score at EndpointBaseline26.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.9
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Total Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint2.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Total Score at EndpointBaseline32.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.1
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Total Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint-1.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15
LCIG (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Total Score at EndpointBaseline29.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.8
LCIG (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Total Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12
p-value: 0.583t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) Total Score at Endpoint

The ZBI is a 22-item questionnaire regarding the caregiver/subject relationship and evaluates the caregiver's health condition, psychological well-being, finances and social life. Each question is answered on a 5-point scale (0=never, 1=rarely, 2=sometimes, 3=quite frequently, and 4=nearly always). The caregiver burden is evaluated by the total score (range 0 to 88) obtained from the sum of the answers to the 22 questions. Higher scores are associated with a higher level of burden for the caregiver.

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (Month 12 months or last post-baseline visit)

Population: Full Analysis Data Set: all enrolled participants who received at least one study S187.3.003 LCIG infusion and had data for baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Change From Baseline in Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) Total Score at EndpointBaseline22.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.3
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Change From Baseline in Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) Total Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint1.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.7
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Change From Baseline in Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) Total Score at EndpointBaseline27.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.2
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Change From Baseline in Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) Total Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint-1.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9
LCIG (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) Total Score at EndpointBaseline24.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.2
LCIG (All Participants)Change From Baseline in Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) Total Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.4
p-value: 0.899t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Clinical Global Impression - Status (CGI-S) Score at Baseline and Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Score at Endpoint

The CGI-S is a global assessment by the Investigator of current symptomatology and impact of illness on functioning. The ratings of the CGI-S are as follows: 1 = normal, 2 = borderline ill, 3 = mildly ill, 4 = moderately ill, 5 = markedly ill, 6 = severely ill, and 7 = among the most extremely ill. The CGI-I is a global assessment by the Investigator of the change in clinical status since the start of treatment. The CGI-I ratings are as follows: 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, 7 = very much worse.

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (Month 12 or last post-baseline visit)

Population: Full Analysis Data Set: all enrolled participants who received at least one study S187.3.003 LCIG infusion and had data for baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment; n=number of participants with assessment at timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Clinical Global Impression - Status (CGI-S) Score at Baseline and Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Score at EndpointCGI-S at Baseline; n=32, 28, 603.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
LCIG (Previous: LCIG + Placebo Capsules)Clinical Global Impression - Status (CGI-S) Score at Baseline and Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Score at EndpointCGI-I at Endpoint; n=33, 29, 622.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Clinical Global Impression - Status (CGI-S) Score at Baseline and Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Score at EndpointCGI-S at Baseline; n=32, 28, 603.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
LCIG (Previous: Placebo Gel + Levodopa-Carbidopa Capsules)Clinical Global Impression - Status (CGI-S) Score at Baseline and Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Score at EndpointCGI-I at Endpoint; n=33, 29, 622.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
LCIG (All Participants)Clinical Global Impression - Status (CGI-S) Score at Baseline and Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Score at EndpointCGI-S at Baseline; n=32, 28, 603.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
LCIG (All Participants)Clinical Global Impression - Status (CGI-S) Score at Baseline and Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Score at EndpointCGI-I at Endpoint; n=33, 29, 622.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026