Skip to content

Does a Migraine Medication Decrease Rotational Motion Sickness in People Suffering From Migraines?

Effect of Rizatriptan on Rotational Motion Sickness in Migraineurs

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00360282
Enrollment
36
Registered
2006-08-04
Start date
2006-08-31
Completion date
2010-03-31
Last updated
2014-12-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Migraine

Keywords

Migraine, Triptans, Motion Sickness

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if Rizatriptan, a migraine medication, lowers motion sickness in migraine sufferers.

Detailed description

Migraine sufferers undergo vestibular tests and were excluded if there were clinically significant abnormalities. Following screening, there were 2 experimental visits in which migraine sufferers were pre-treated with either Rizatriptan or placebo. After taking the drug, subjects were idle for 2 hours. Baseline motion sickness and subjective units of distress levels were assessed prior to undergoing sinusoidal-earth-vertical earth axis rotation in darkness at 0.05 Hz. Scores were taken immediately after stopping. Subjects were given a 2 minutes rest and then underwent a motion sickness provoking rotation. Subjective scores were assessed immediately following. Another two minute rest was given and if the subject was able, underwent a second motion sickness provoking stimulus followed by an assessment.

Interventions

10 mg Rizatriptan in an unlabeled pill given once on one of two visits

OTHERPlacebo

In an unlabeled pill given once on one of two visits.

Sponsors

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Pittsburgh
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* History of motion sickness * Currently suffering from migraines with at least 2 episodes during the previous 12 months * Previous use and tolerance to triptans

Exclusion criteria

* Current tobacco user * History of or current hypertension, cardiac disease, arrhythmia, hypercholesterolemia, hemiplegic/basilar migraine, stroke, diabetes, vascular disease or kidney disease * Family history of early myocardial infarction (first-degree relative \< 45 years old at time of event) * Constant dizziness or constant vestibular symptoms * History of ear, nose and throat (ENT) disease, e.g. Meniere's disease * Current treatment with propranolol or medications that would preclude use of a triptan(e.g. ergotamine) * Major vestibular abnormality found on screening * Testing positive on over-the-counter pregnancy test * Taken an Monamine Oxidase (MAO) inhibitor within two weeks of testing * Allergy or intolerance to gelatin * Corrected visual acuity of \> 20/40 O.U. * Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Motion Sickness to Post Vestibular StimulusPre and Post Stimulus (about 6 minutes apart)Scores are based on a scale developed by Graybiel which rates seven subjective and objective signs of motion sickness. The total scores ranged from from 0 to 25. Zero indicating no motion sickness. Greater than 16 indicates severe motion sickness. Trials were stopped if scores were 16 or greater. Scores were taken before and after each rotation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Subjective Units of Distress to Post Vestibular StimulusPre and Post Stimulus (6 minutes apart)Subjective report of distress ranging from 0 to 10 based on the method of Wolpe. Zero indicates no distress and 10 indicates severe distress. Measures used in this analysis match the times used in the analysis for Outcome 1.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects were recruited from the general public in Pittsburgh, PA from October 2006 until November 2008.

Pre-assignment details

36 subjects recruited; 9 were not assigned to a group (3 did not not meet migraine inclusion criteria, 1 was excluded on vestibular screening results, 1 withdrew, 4 were lost to follow up)

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Study Participants
Includes participants (migraineurs) with and without vertigo
27
Total27

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Second InterventionAdverse Event0100
Washout 1-3 WeeksLost to Follow-up0010

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Study Participants
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
27 Participants
Age, Continuous32 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
Region of Enrollment
United States
27 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
25 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 140 / 140 / 120 / 13
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 140 / 140 / 120 / 13

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Motion Sickness to Post Vestibular Stimulus

Scores are based on a scale developed by Graybiel which rates seven subjective and objective signs of motion sickness. The total scores ranged from from 0 to 25. Zero indicating no motion sickness. Greater than 16 indicates severe motion sickness. Trials were stopped if scores were 16 or greater. Scores were taken before and after each rotation.

Time frame: Pre and Post Stimulus (about 6 minutes apart)

Population: Ten of the 25 subjects who completed both experimental visits developed negligible motion sickness induced by the stimulus following pre-medication with placebo. These data were not analyzed. It was posited that the presence/absence of vertigo would not impact the analysis of this outcome. The groups were combined for the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Rizatriptan VisitChange From Baseline in Motion Sickness to Post Vestibular Stimulus5.1 units on a scale
Placebo VisitChange From Baseline in Motion Sickness to Post Vestibular Stimulus9 units on a scale
p-value: 0.007Sign test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Subjective Units of Distress to Post Vestibular Stimulus

Subjective report of distress ranging from 0 to 10 based on the method of Wolpe. Zero indicates no distress and 10 indicates severe distress. Measures used in this analysis match the times used in the analysis for Outcome 1.

Time frame: Pre and Post Stimulus (6 minutes apart)

Population: Ten of the 25 subjects who completed both experimental visits developed negligible motion sickness induced by the stimulus following pre-medication with placebo. These data were not analyzed. It was posited that the presence/absence of vertigo would not impact the analysis of this outcome. The groups were combined for the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Rizatriptan VisitChange From Baseline in Subjective Units of Distress to Post Vestibular Stimulus3 units on a scale
Placebo VisitChange From Baseline in Subjective Units of Distress to Post Vestibular Stimulus2 units on a scale
p-value: 0.549Sign test

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026