Skip to content

ISSUE3: International Study on Syncope of Uncertain Etiology 3

ISSUE3: International Study on Syncope of Uncertain Etiology 3 Pacemaker Therapy for Patients With Asystolic Neurally-mediated Syncope

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00359203
Enrollment
511
Registered
2006-08-01
Start date
2006-09-30
Completion date
2012-11-30
Last updated
2025-07-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Syncope

Keywords

syncope, implantable loop recorder

Brief summary

ISSUE 3 is a multi-center, prospective, randomised controlled double-blind study aimed to assess the effectiveness of pacemaker therapy for prevention of asystolic neurally-mediated syncope.

Detailed description

In asystolic neurally-mediated syncope (NMS) documented by Implantable Loop recorder (ILR), ISSUE-2, an observational trial, showed that pacemaker was effective in reducing the 1-year first syncope recurrence rate from 33% rate before implant (ILR phase 1) to 5% rate after implant (phase 2). Moreover, the control non-asystolic group still continued to have a 41% recurrence rate after the first recurrence of syncope, thus supporting the conclusion that the reduction with pacemaker was due to the beneficial effect of pacemaker itself and not to other factors. However a formal controlled trial is needed to confirm these findings.

Interventions

DEVICEDual chamber pacemeker

Sponsors

Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Suspected or certain neurally-mediated syncope, based on the Guidelines recently published by the Task Force on Syncope of the European Society of Cardiology 2,3 (Appendix 1); * More than 3 syncope episodes in the last 2 years; * Clinical presentation of syncope of sufficient severity requiring treatment initiation in the physician's and patient's judgement. * Age \> 40 years. * Negative carotid sinus massage. * Patients accept to have an ILR implantation.

Exclusion criteria

* Carotid sinus hypersensitivity * Suspected or certain heart disease and high likelihood of cardiac syncope: * Symptomatic orthostatic hypotension diagnosed by standing blood pressure measurement; * Loss of consciousness different from syncope (e.g. epilepsy, psychiatric, metabolic, drop-attack, TIA, intoxication, cataplexy); * Subclavian steal syndrome; * Psychologically or physically (due to any other illness) or cognitively unfit for participation in the study according to the opinion of the investigator; * Patient compliance doubtful; * Patient geographically or otherwise inaccessible for follow-up; * Patient unwilling or unable to give informed consent; * Life expectancy \<1 year.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Syncope Recurrence Rate2 yearsIntention to treat analysis of percentage of patients with syncope recurrence at 2 years follow-up after study arm assignement

Countries

Italy

Participant flow

Recruitment details

From April 2007 to April 2011, 89 out of 511 patients (pts) implanted with implantable loop recorder (ILR) documented an asystolic syncope of \>=3 sec or a non-syncopal asystole of \>= 6 sec, inclusion criteria to be implanted with a dual chamber pacemaker (PM) and randomized to PM on or PM off. 77 pts out of 89 eligible pts were randomized.

Pre-assignment details

12 out of 89 eligible pts refused randomization

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Dual Chamber Pacemaker OFF
Implant dual chamber pacemaker programmed ODO (switched OFF)
39
Dual Chamber Pacemeker ON
Implant dual chamber pacemaker programmed ON and with Rate Drope Response algorhythm programmed ON
38
Total77

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDual Chamber Pacemeker ONTotalDual Chamber Pacemaker OFF
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
21 Participants38 Participants17 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
17 Participants39 Participants22 Participants
Age, Continuous63 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
63 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
63 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
Region of Enrollment
Austria
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
2 participants3 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
France
3 participants5 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
4 participants7 participants3 participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
16 participants36 participants20 participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
8 participants16 participants8 participants
Region of Enrollment
Switzerland
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
5 participants7 participants2 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants41 Participants23 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
20 Participants36 Participants16 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 392 / 38
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 393 / 38

Outcome results

Primary

Syncope Recurrence Rate

Intention to treat analysis of percentage of patients with syncope recurrence at 2 years follow-up after study arm assignement

Time frame: 2 years

Population: 77 patients implanted with dual chamber pacemaker: 39 patients randomized to pacemaker OFF and 38 patients randomized to pacemaker ON

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dual Chamber Pacemaker OFFSyncope Recurrence Rate57 percentage of participants
Dual Chamber Pacemeker ONSyncope Recurrence Rate25 percentage of participants
Comparison: The analysis was designed to have 80% power to detect a 1-year absolute reduction of 25% in the risk of recurrence of first syncope in the Pm ON arm applying a log-rank test with a 2-sided significance level of 0.05. This analysis was planned as a comparison of the cumulative risk of syncope between the 2 groups with the use of a log-rank test.p-value: 0.0495% CI: [0.19, 0.96]Log Rank
p-value: 0.03995% CI: [0.19, 0.96]Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 26, 2026