Skip to content

Management of Displaced Supracondylar Fractures of the Humerus Using Lateral vs. Crossed K-wires

Management of Displaced Supracondylar Fractures of the Humerus Using Lateral Versus Cross K Wires: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00358787
Enrollment
55
Registered
2006-08-01
Start date
2008-07-31
Completion date
2017-11-30
Last updated
2018-01-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Humeral Fractures

Keywords

Supracondylar fracture, humerus, ulnar nerve injury, Baumann's angle, Supracondylar fracture of the humerus

Brief summary

Completely displaced (Type III) supracondylar fractures of the humerus are treated in the operating room and are held together with pins stuck into the bone. There are two ways of inserting the pins: crossed and laterally. The crossed method is often used because it is thought to be more stable, but this method also carries a risk of hitting the ulnar nerve. It is not known which method is more stable. Our hypothesis is that loss of reduction will be equivalent between the two pinning methods.

Detailed description

Children with type III supracondylar fractures of humerus who meet the study inclusion criteria will be invited to participate in the study by the on call orthopaedic surgeon. All patients will be required to provide informed consent. Patients will then be randomized through a random number software package and will commence immediately after confirmation of inclusion into the study. The fracture is reduced and fixed percutaneously either with crossed or lateral K wires, according to which group the subject was randomized to. Post reduction antero-posterior and lateral radiographs of the elbow are done in the operating room. Above elbow cast is applied. Radiographs are taken at follow-up visits to the clinic. The radiographs are measured to determine loss of reduction between immediate post-op films and films taken immediately prior to pin removal.

Interventions

PROCEDURECrossed K-wiring of supracondylar fracture of the humerus

Closed reduction of the fracture followed by crossed K wire percutaneous pinning.

PROCEDURELateral K-wiring of supracondylar fracture of the humerus

Closed reduction of the fracture followed by lateral K wire percutaneous pinning.

Sponsors

University of British Columbia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
3 Years to 7 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male and female patients scheduled for closed reduction and K wiring of supracondylar fractures of the humerus under general anaesthesia a * Type-3 Supracondylar fractures of the humerus. * Aged 3 to 7 years old * Consent to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

* Open supracondylar fractures of the humerus * Children with pre-operative ulnar nerve injury * Supracondylar fractures with compartment syndrome needing fasciotomy * Supracondylar fractures needing vascular repair * Refusal to provide informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Loss of reduction between lateral K wires and crossed K wires in the treatment of supracondylar fractures of the humerus (at pin removal)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Functional outcome (3 years post-op)3 years
Rate of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026