Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of T1225 1.5% Versus Tobramycin 0.3 % in the Treatment of Purulent Bacterial Conjunctivitis

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of T1225 1.5% Eye Drops (3-Day Treatment) Versus Tobramycin 0.3 % Eye Drops (7-Day Treatment) in the Treatment of Purulent Bacterial Conjunctivitis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00357773
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2006-07-27
Start date
2004-05-31
Completion date
2005-06-30
Last updated
2006-07-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Conjunctivitis, Bacterial

Brief summary

To demonstrate the efficacy of T1225 1.5% eye drops, in comparison to reference product, for the treatment of purulent bacterial conjunctivitis, and to assess the safety

Detailed description

The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy and safety of T1225 1.5% eye drops administered BID for 3 days in comparison to reference antibiotic eye drops, tobramycin, for the treatment of purulent bacterial conjunctivitis. The study was conducted as a Phase III, multicentre, international, investigator-masked, randomised, parallel-group, non-inferiority study in newborns, children, and adults.

Interventions

Sponsors

Laboratoires Thea
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Days to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female \>= 1 day old (newborn, infant, child, adult); * written informed consent by patient or legally acceptable representative; * purulent bacterial conjunctivitis (unilateral or bilateral) defined as bulbar conjunctival injection (mild, moderate, or severe) AND conjunctival purulent discharge (mild, moderate or severe).

Exclusion criteria

* Bacterial conjunctivitis diagnosed \>= 7 days ago; * bacterial infection due to trauma or foreign body; * dacryocystitis; * corneal ulceration or keratitis; * viral ocular infection; closed angle glaucoma; * acute allergy conjunctivitis; * clinically significant ocular abnormality; * organic amblyopia, monophthalmia; * corrected visual acuity below 20/100; * contact lens wearer; * newborn (i.e. 0-2 months old) not born at term (\< 37 weeks of amenorrhea); * ocular surgery, laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK), or photo-refractive keratectomy (PRK) in last 12 months; * ocular laser treatment in last 3 months; * systemic macrolide antibiotics in last month; * systemic steroids in last 2 weeks or during the study; * topical ocular macrolide antibiotics and/or topical ocular steroids and/or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in last week; * topical (ocular, nasal, bronchial etc.) treatments and/or systemic NSAIDs in last day; * immunosuppressives and/or any systemic antibiotic on D0.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Clinical cure in the worse eye on Test of Cure (TOC) visit at Day 9, defined as a score 0 for bulbar conjunctival injection and a score 0 for conjunctival purulent discharge (each graded on 4-point scales)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Clinical cure at Day 3
Microbiological cure at Day 3 and Day 9
Global efficacy.
Tolerance

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026