Skip to content

Safety and Effectiveness of Lopinavir/Ritonavir in Individuals Who Have Failed Prior HIV Therapy

A Pilot Study of Lopinavir/Ritonavir in Participants Experiencing Virologic Relapse on NNRTI-Containing Regimens

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00357552
Enrollment
123
Registered
2006-07-27
Start date
2008-01-31
Completion date
2012-05-31
Last updated
2018-03-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV Infections

Keywords

Treatment Experienced

Brief summary

Most anti-HIV regimens include a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI); however, some individuals fail on these regimens. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the protease inhibitor (PI) lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) in HIV infected individuals who are failing an anti-HIV regimen that includes an NNRTI.

Detailed description

Standard effective antiretroviral therapy for HIV infected individuals includes three-drug combinations of two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) with either a PI or an NNRTI. However, three-drug regimens may not be ideal in resource-limited settings, where viral load and resistance testing may not be readily available. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the PI LPV/r alone in treatment-experienced, PI-naive HIV infected individuals who are experiencing virologic failure on three-drug regimens. This study will last 104 weeks. All participants will receive LPV/r twice daily for up to 104 weeks. Participants who experience virologic failure will receive emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate once daily in addition to LPV/r twice daily for the remainder of the study. There will be 16 study visits for participants on LPV/r monotherapy and 12 study visits for participants who have intensified LPV/r with emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. Blood collection and clinical assessment will occur at all visits; urine collection and resistance testing will occur at selected visits.

Interventions

DRUGEmtricitabine/Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate

Once daily

DRUGLopinavir/Ritonavir

Twice daily

Sponsors

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
CollaboratorNIH
Advancing Clinical Therapeutics Globally for HIV/AIDS and Other Infections
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

for Step 1 Participants: * HIV infected * Continuous treatment with a three-drug, NNRTI-containing regimen for at least 6 months prior to study entry * Viral load of 1,000 copies/ml or greater and less or equal to 200,000 copies/ml obtained within 30 days of study entry * Negative pregnancy test within 48 hours of study entry * Willing to use acceptable forms of contraception for the duration of the study * Laboratory values obtained within 30 days of study entry: * Hemoglobin greater or equal to 8.0 g/dL * Platelet count greater or equal to 50,000/mm3 * Estimated Creatinine Clearance greater or equal to 60 mL/min x ULN * AST (SGOT), ALT (SGPT) and alkaline phosphatase \< 3 x ULN * Total bilirubin less or equal to 2.5 x ULN * Ability and willingness of participant or legal guardian/representative to give informed consent Inclusion Criteria for Step 2 Participants: * Virologic failure on LPV/r monotherapy defined as viral load of 400 copies/ml or greater after 24 consecutive weeks on LPV/r monotherapy OR virologic failure after initial viral suppression on LPV/r monotherapy * Estimated creatinine clearance of 60 ml/min or greater * Negative pregnancy test within 48 hours of entry into Step 2 * Willing to use acceptable forms of contraception for the duration of the study

Exclusion criteria

for All Participants: * Breastfeeding * Known allergy or sensitivity to study drugs * Active drug or alcohol use or dependence that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with study adherence to study requirements * History of chronic hepatitis B infection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Enrolled Participants With Virologic Success at Week 24 on LPV/r MonotherapyFrom study entry to week 24Virologic success at week 24 on LPV/r monotherapy was defined as remaining on LPV/r monotherapy at week 24 without prior virologic failure. Virologic failure was met with either of these two conditions: (i) failure to suppress HIV-1 RNA to \< 400 copies/mL by week 24 or (ii) confirmed HIV-1 RNA \>= 400 copies/mL after confirmed HIV-1 RNA \< 400 copies/mL.
Probability of Grade 3 or 4 Sign or Symptom, or Laboratory Toxicity Over 24 Weeks on Study.From study entry to week 24Probability of Grade 3 or 4 sign or symptom, or laboratory toxicity over 24 weeks on study using Kaplan-Meier estimates of the cumulative probability of Grade 3 or 4 sign or symptom, or laboratory toxicity at week 24. Grading of adverse events (signs and symptoms and laboratory toxicities) was according to Division of AIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events, Version 1.0, December 2004.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Treatment Failure, Defined as the First Occurrence of Death, Disease Progression, or Virologic Failure.Study entry to Week 10425th percentile in weeks from study entry to treatment failure, defined as the first occurrence of death, disease progression, or virologic failure. Virologic failure was defined as HIV-1 \>= 400 copies/mL after week 24 or 2 consecutive HIV-1 RNA \>= 400 copies/mL after week 16 following suppression on LPV/r monotherapy.
Number of Participants With Study-targeted Diagnoses and Clinical EventsStudy entry to week 104Cardiac disorders, Infections and infestations, Metabolism and nutrition disorders, Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (including cysts and polyps), Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions, Vascular disorders, were specified a priori as study-targeted events by the study chair.
Number of Subjects With at Least One New PI-associated Resistance Mutation at Time of Virologic Failure.At time of virologic failureNumber of subjects with at least one new PI-associated resistance mutation at time of virologic failure. Resistance interpretations used the May 6, 2009 Stanford algorithm.
Percentage of Subjects Reporting Not Skipping Medications in the Last Month.Study entry and weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24The percentage of subjects reporting never missing medications in the last month.
Change in CD4+ Cell Counts From Study Entry to Week 104Study entry and week 104
Level of HIV-1 RNA as Ascertained From Paired DBS and PlasmaAt study entry and weeks 24 and 48Proportion of DBS samples with HIV-1 RNA level \<= 400 copies/mL, proportion of plasma samples with HIV-1 RNA level \<= 400 copies/mL and proportion of paired DBS and plasma samples that are concordant (both \<= 400 copies/mL or both \> 400 copies/mL). Results are pooled over 4 different storage temperature conditions (-80C, -20C, 4C and room temperature).
HIV-1 Viral Sequence as Ascertained From Paired DBS and PlasmaAt study entry and virologic failureHIV-1 viral sequencing as ascertained from paired DBS and plasma
Proportion of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Levels < 400 Copies/mL From Baseline to Week 104At Weeks 0, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 68, 80, 92, 104
Time to First New Grade 3 or 4 Sign or Symptom or Laboratory Toxicity Following LPV/r IntensificationFrom LPV/r intensification to week 10425th percentile in weeks from study entry to first new grade 3 or 4 sign or symptom or laboratory toxicity following LPV/r intensification. Grading of adverse events (signs and symptoms and laboratory toxicities) was according to Division of AIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events, Version 1.0, December 2004.
Number of Screened Subjects With at Least One NNRTI, or NRTI-associated Resistance Mutation at A5230 Screening.ScreeningNumber of screened subjects with at least one NNRTI, or NRTI-associated resistance mutation. Resistance interpretations used the November 30, 2011 Stanford algorithm.

Countries

India, Malawi, South Africa, Tanzania, Thailand

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
LPV/r Monotherapy
Participants will receive lopinavir/ritonavir twice daily for up to 104 weeks. Upon confirmation of virologic failure, emtricitabine (FTC)/tenofovir (TDF) once a day will be added to their regimen.
123
Total123

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
ScreeningDid not meet eligibility criteria84
Weeks 0 to 24Death1
Weeks 24 to 104Death3
Weeks 24 to 104Not able to get to clinic2

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLPV/r Monotherapy
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
123 Participants
Age, Continuous39.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
Region of Enrollment
India
12 participants
Region of Enrollment
Malawi
40 participants
Region of Enrollment
South Africa
22 participants
Region of Enrollment
Tanzania
25 participants
Region of Enrollment
Thailand
24 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
70 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
53 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
122 / 123
serious
Total, serious adverse events
20 / 123

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Enrolled Participants With Virologic Success at Week 24 on LPV/r Monotherapy

Virologic success at week 24 on LPV/r monotherapy was defined as remaining on LPV/r monotherapy at week 24 without prior virologic failure. Virologic failure was met with either of these two conditions: (i) failure to suppress HIV-1 RNA to \< 400 copies/mL by week 24 or (ii) confirmed HIV-1 RNA \>= 400 copies/mL after confirmed HIV-1 RNA \< 400 copies/mL.

Time frame: From study entry to week 24

Population: All enrolled individuals.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
LPV/r MonotherapyPercentage of Enrolled Participants With Virologic Success at Week 24 on LPV/r Monotherapy87 percentage of enrolled subjects
Comparison: The null hypothesis was that LPV/r monotherapy provides at least a 65% short-term virologic response. The target sample size was 120 subjects. Assuming an underlying true 24 week success rate of 76%, this sample size was chosen in order to provide at least 90% power to show that the true 24 week virologic success rate of LPV/r monotherapy in this population is greater than 65%.90% CI: [81, 92]confidence interval
Primary

Probability of Grade 3 or 4 Sign or Symptom, or Laboratory Toxicity Over 24 Weeks on Study.

Probability of Grade 3 or 4 sign or symptom, or laboratory toxicity over 24 weeks on study using Kaplan-Meier estimates of the cumulative probability of Grade 3 or 4 sign or symptom, or laboratory toxicity at week 24. Grading of adverse events (signs and symptoms and laboratory toxicities) was according to Division of AIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events, Version 1.0, December 2004.

Time frame: From study entry to week 24

Population: All enrolled individuals.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
LPV/r MonotherapyProbability of Grade 3 or 4 Sign or Symptom, or Laboratory Toxicity Over 24 Weeks on Study.0.23 cumulative probability of grade 3 or 4
Secondary

Change in CD4+ Cell Counts From Study Entry to Week 104

Time frame: Study entry and week 104

Population: All participants enrolled.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
LPV/r MonotherapyChange in CD4+ Cell Counts From Study Entry to Week 104213 cells/mm^3
Secondary

HIV-1 Viral Sequence as Ascertained From Paired DBS and Plasma

HIV-1 viral sequencing as ascertained from paired DBS and plasma

Time frame: At study entry and virologic failure

Population: HIV-1 viral sequence testing in DBS was not performed

Secondary

Level of HIV-1 RNA as Ascertained From Paired DBS and Plasma

Proportion of DBS samples with HIV-1 RNA level \<= 400 copies/mL, proportion of plasma samples with HIV-1 RNA level \<= 400 copies/mL and proportion of paired DBS and plasma samples that are concordant (both \<= 400 copies/mL or both \> 400 copies/mL). Results are pooled over 4 different storage temperature conditions (-80C, -20C, 4C and room temperature).

Time frame: At study entry and weeks 24 and 48

Population: Participants with DBS samples available at study entry, week 24 or 48, with corresponding plasma HIV-1 RNA levels.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LPV/r MonotherapyLevel of HIV-1 RNA as Ascertained From Paired DBS and Plasmastudy entry DBS <= 400 cp/mL0.17 proportion of samples
LPV/r MonotherapyLevel of HIV-1 RNA as Ascertained From Paired DBS and Plasmastudy entry plasma <= 400 cp/mL0.00 proportion of samples
LPV/r MonotherapyLevel of HIV-1 RNA as Ascertained From Paired DBS and Plasmastudy entry DBS & plasma concordance0.83 proportion of samples
LPV/r MonotherapyLevel of HIV-1 RNA as Ascertained From Paired DBS and Plasmaweek 24 DBS <= 400 cp/mL0.82 proportion of samples
LPV/r MonotherapyLevel of HIV-1 RNA as Ascertained From Paired DBS and Plasmaweek 24 plasma <= 400 cp/mL0.80 proportion of samples
LPV/r MonotherapyLevel of HIV-1 RNA as Ascertained From Paired DBS and Plasmaweek 24 DBS & plasma concordance0.80 proportion of samples
LPV/r MonotherapyLevel of HIV-1 RNA as Ascertained From Paired DBS and Plasmaweek 48 DBS <= 400 cp/mL0.94 proportion of samples
LPV/r MonotherapyLevel of HIV-1 RNA as Ascertained From Paired DBS and Plasmaweek 48 plasma <= 400 cp/mL0.91 proportion of samples
LPV/r MonotherapyLevel of HIV-1 RNA as Ascertained From Paired DBS and Plasmaweek 48 DBS & plasma concordance0.97 proportion of samples
Secondary

Number of Participants With Study-targeted Diagnoses and Clinical Events

Cardiac disorders, Infections and infestations, Metabolism and nutrition disorders, Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (including cysts and polyps), Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions, Vascular disorders, were specified a priori as study-targeted events by the study chair.

Time frame: Study entry to week 104

Population: All participants enrolled.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
LPV/r MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Study-targeted Diagnoses and Clinical Events39 participants
Secondary

Number of Screened Subjects With at Least One NNRTI, or NRTI-associated Resistance Mutation at A5230 Screening.

Number of screened subjects with at least one NNRTI, or NRTI-associated resistance mutation. Resistance interpretations used the November 30, 2011 Stanford algorithm.

Time frame: Screening

Population: All screened individuals.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LPV/r MonotherapyNumber of Screened Subjects With at Least One NNRTI, or NRTI-associated Resistance Mutation at A5230 Screening.At least one NNRTI-associated mutation201 number of screened subjects
LPV/r MonotherapyNumber of Screened Subjects With at Least One NNRTI, or NRTI-associated Resistance Mutation at A5230 Screening.At least one NRTI-associated mutation197 number of screened subjects
Secondary

Number of Subjects With at Least One New PI-associated Resistance Mutation at Time of Virologic Failure.

Number of subjects with at least one new PI-associated resistance mutation at time of virologic failure. Resistance interpretations used the May 6, 2009 Stanford algorithm.

Time frame: At time of virologic failure

Population: 16 subjects met the criteria for endpoint failure; 15 subjects were virologic failures and 1 subject intensified prior to virologic failure. Of the 15 subjects with virologic failure, 11 had sequence data, and sequencing failed for 4.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
LPV/r MonotherapyNumber of Subjects With at Least One New PI-associated Resistance Mutation at Time of Virologic Failure.2 participants
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects Reporting Not Skipping Medications in the Last Month.

The percentage of subjects reporting never missing medications in the last month.

Time frame: Study entry and weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Population: All participants enrolled.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LPV/r MonotherapyPercentage of Subjects Reporting Not Skipping Medications in the Last Month.week 20 (N=120)90.9 percentage of subjects with data
LPV/r MonotherapyPercentage of Subjects Reporting Not Skipping Medications in the Last Month.week 24 (N=122)89.4 percentage of subjects with data
LPV/r MonotherapyPercentage of Subjects Reporting Not Skipping Medications in the Last Month.week 2 (N=120)90 percentage of subjects with data
LPV/r MonotherapyPercentage of Subjects Reporting Not Skipping Medications in the Last Month.week 4 (N=121)86.8 percentage of subjects with data
LPV/r MonotherapyPercentage of Subjects Reporting Not Skipping Medications in the Last Month.week 8 (N=123)87.8 percentage of subjects with data
LPV/r MonotherapyPercentage of Subjects Reporting Not Skipping Medications in the Last Month.week 12 (N=123)86.2 percentage of subjects with data
LPV/r MonotherapyPercentage of Subjects Reporting Not Skipping Medications in the Last Month.week 16 (N=122)86.1 percentage of subjects with data
Secondary

Proportion of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Levels < 400 Copies/mL From Baseline to Week 104

Time frame: At Weeks 0, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 68, 80, 92, 104

Population: All participants enrolled.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LPV/r MonotherapyProportion of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Levels < 400 Copies/mL From Baseline to Week 104week 0 (N=123)0.02 proportion of participants
LPV/r MonotherapyProportion of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Levels < 400 Copies/mL From Baseline to Week 104week 32 (N=121)0.83 proportion of participants
LPV/r MonotherapyProportion of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Levels < 400 Copies/mL From Baseline to Week 104week 40 (N=118)0.84 proportion of participants
LPV/r MonotherapyProportion of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Levels < 400 Copies/mL From Baseline to Week 104week 48 (N=118)0.87 proportion of participants
LPV/r MonotherapyProportion of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Levels < 400 Copies/mL From Baseline to Week 104week 56 (N=120)0.86 proportion of participants
LPV/r MonotherapyProportion of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Levels < 400 Copies/mL From Baseline to Week 104week 68 (N=116)0.91 proportion of participants
LPV/r MonotherapyProportion of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Levels < 400 Copies/mL From Baseline to Week 104week 80 (N=117)0.85 proportion of participants
LPV/r MonotherapyProportion of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Levels < 400 Copies/mL From Baseline to Week 104week 92 (N=116)0.87 proportion of participants
LPV/r MonotherapyProportion of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Levels < 400 Copies/mL From Baseline to Week 104week 104 (N=117)0.89 proportion of participants
LPV/r MonotherapyProportion of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Levels < 400 Copies/mL From Baseline to Week 104week 12 (N=122)0.75 proportion of participants
LPV/r MonotherapyProportion of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Levels < 400 Copies/mL From Baseline to Week 104week 16 (N=121)0.87 proportion of participants
LPV/r MonotherapyProportion of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Levels < 400 Copies/mL From Baseline to Week 104week 20 (N=115)0.84 proportion of participants
LPV/r MonotherapyProportion of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Levels < 400 Copies/mL From Baseline to Week 104week 24 (N=122)0.84 proportion of participants
Secondary

Time to First New Grade 3 or 4 Sign or Symptom or Laboratory Toxicity Following LPV/r Intensification

25th percentile in weeks from study entry to first new grade 3 or 4 sign or symptom or laboratory toxicity following LPV/r intensification. Grading of adverse events (signs and symptoms and laboratory toxicities) was according to Division of AIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events, Version 1.0, December 2004.

Time frame: From LPV/r intensification to week 104

Population: All participants enrolled.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
LPV/r MonotherapyTime to First New Grade 3 or 4 Sign or Symptom or Laboratory Toxicity Following LPV/r Intensification26.0 weeks
Secondary

Time to Treatment Failure, Defined as the First Occurrence of Death, Disease Progression, or Virologic Failure.

25th percentile in weeks from study entry to treatment failure, defined as the first occurrence of death, disease progression, or virologic failure. Virologic failure was defined as HIV-1 \>= 400 copies/mL after week 24 or 2 consecutive HIV-1 RNA \>= 400 copies/mL after week 16 following suppression on LPV/r monotherapy.

Time frame: Study entry to Week 104

Population: All participants enrolled.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
LPV/r MonotherapyTime to Treatment Failure, Defined as the First Occurrence of Death, Disease Progression, or Virologic Failure.48.0 weeks

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 5, 2026