Skip to content

Prolongation of the Interval Between Monitoring of Warfarin in Stable Patients

A Randomized Double-blind Study of 4-weekly Versus 12-weekly Monitoring of Stable Patients on Long-term Anticoagulation With Warfarin

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00356759
Enrollment
250
Registered
2006-07-26
Start date
2006-12-31
Completion date
2010-02-28
Last updated
2018-08-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation, Heart Valve Diseases, Venous Thrombosis

Keywords

warfarin, prothrombin time, monitoring

Brief summary

Patients with mechanical heart valve prosthesis or with irregular beat (atrial fibrillation) have a high risk of blood clot formation. Such clots can result in a stroke. The patients are treated with warfarin - a blood thinner - to prevent these complications. The treatment has to be monitored with a blood test called Prothrombin time (PT) every 1-4 weeks. The dose of warfarin has to be changed whenever the PT result is outside of the treatment range. If the result is too low there is an increased risk of blood clots. If, instead, the result is too high there is a risk of bleeding. One third of the patients have very stable PT results and hardly ever have to change the dose. The investigators hypothesis is that these patients can go less often, e.g. every 12 weeks, for the blood tests.

Detailed description

OBJECTIVE: The PRolongation of the INTerval between prothrombin time tests in stable patients (PRINT) is a single center, randomized, double-blind study to demonstrate that testing the prothrombin time every 12 weeks provides the same level of anticoagulant control as conventional testing every 4 weeks in this subset of stable patients. This study will enroll patients who have been treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) for at least 6 months and have not had any change to the maintenance dose for the most recent 6 months. HYPOTHESIS: Our hypothesis is that by extending the interval between tests to 12 weeks in these stable patients, the same level of anticoagulant control, can be maintained. With the large and constantly increasing number of patients on warfarin, a reduced frequency of testing would yield considerable savings for the health care system and a decreased burden for the patient. A review of our anticoagulant clinic revealed that one third of the patients would be eligible for such a prolongation of the test interval. STUDY DESIGN: The proposal is a randomized, double-blind, controlled single centre trial performed at Hamilton Health Sciences - General Hospital. Main inclusion criteria are: long-term anticoagulant therapy, managed by our clinic for at least 6 months and with unchanged maintenance dose for at least 6 months. Eligible and consenting patients identified at annual review visits or from the register of patients monitored by the clinic, will be randomized to dosing of warfarin every 4 weeks (control) or every 12 weeks (experimental). All patients will, however, have blood drawn every 4 weeks. Randomization will be performed using a computer-generated randomization sequence. Stratification is done for the two laboratories performing the analysis and for the two therapeutic ranges that patients are to be maintained within, depending on the indication for anticoagulation. Patients with mechanical mitral valve prosthesis are maintained between 2.5 and 3.5, others between 2.0 and 3.0.The randomization sequence will guide the Coordinating and Methods Center to the correct reporting procedure for each patient, and to provide sham INR-values for two out of each set of three 4-weekly tests in the patients allocated to 12-weekly monitoring. Extreme INR results (\<1.5 or \>4.4) will always be reported as true results. The investigator and the patient are blind to the procedure and are only aware of the sequence order number.The patients are carefully instructed about risk factors that can change the effect of VKA. They are contacted by telephone after each test for information on the result, the dosing and for questioning of adverse events. After 12 months in the study there is a final visit scheduled at the anticoagulation clinic for review of the patient. ANALYSIS: After the last patient has concluded the study, all clinical data will be transferred to the study statistician for analysis. The primary outcome measure is the time in therapeutic range (TTR). The secondary outcome measures are proportion of patients with extreme INR results, proportion of INR results that are extreme and number of changes of the maintenance dose. These are well-recognized tools for evaluation of the level of anticoagulant control. Major bleeding and objectively verified thromboembolic events will also be registered, but the expected number is very small and not sufficient for any statistical analyses. SAMPLE SIZE: Sample size calculations are based on 77% TTR for a population with very stable VKA-dose and a maximum tolerable deviation of 7.5 percentage points; one-sided alpha of 2.5% and power of 90%. The sample will accordingly be 107 patients per group. After interim analysis the DSMB recommended to expand the sample size to 125 patients per group (July 16, 2008).

Interventions

DRUGDosing warfarin every 12 weeks, sham INRs 2 out of 3 times

Warfarin is dosed according to INR to maintain INR 2.0-3.0 or for mechanical mitral valves or mechanical aortic valves with atrial fibrillation INR 2.5-3.5

Sponsors

The Physicians' Services Incorporated Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients on long-term warfarin (for prophylaxis of arterial embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation or mechanical heart valve replacement, or secondary prophylaxis after VTE) with a target INR of 2.0-3.0 or 2.5-3.5, * Anticoagulant therapy managed by the clinic (HHS - General Hospital) for at least 6 months prior to enrolment, and * Maintenance dose of warfarin unchanged for the previous 6 months or longer.

Exclusion criteria

* Age \<18 years, * Life expectancy of less than 1 year, * Attending physician believes the patient is not suitable for the study (e.g. psychiatric disorder, history of non-compliance), * Geographic inaccessibility or * Failure to obtain written consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Primary Outcome Measure: Time in Therapeutic Range12 monthsPercent time in therapeutic range calculated by linear interpolation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Secondary Efficacy Outcomes: Thromboembolic Events12 monthsNumber of patients with any objectively verified, independently adjudicated thromboembolic event during the 12-month study period
Secondary Safety Outcome: Major Bleeding12 monthsNumber of patients with any objectively verified, independently adjudicated major bleeding event during the 12-month study period. Major bleeding was defined according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) criteria
Secondary Safety Outcome: Number of Patients With Extreme INR Results12 monthsSecondary safety outcome is number of patients with at least one INR below 1.5 or above 4.4
Number of Extreme INR Results12 monthsNumber of INRs outside the range 1.5-4.4
Patients With Dose Changes12 monthsNumber of patients with at least one change of maintenance dose during the 12-month study period

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Dose Assessment 4-weekly
INRs and dose assessments every 4 weeks true values, no sham INRs
126
Dose Assessment 12-weekly
INRs and dose assessment 4-weekly, but 2 of 3 INRs are sham results, so dose assessment on true result is only 12-weekly
124
Total250

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event13
Overall StudyDeath52
Overall StudyIntercurrent disease or persistent extre52
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up11
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject22

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDose Assessment 4-weeklyDose Assessment 12-weeklyTotal
Age, Continuous
Age
72 years70 years71 years
Sex: Female, Male
Female
39 Participants37 Participants76 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
87 Participants87 Participants174 Participants
Therapeutic INR range
INR range 2.0-3.0
111 participants109 participants220 participants
Therapeutic INR range
INR range 2.5-3.5
15 participants15 participants30 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 1245 / 126
other
Total, other adverse events
7 / 1244 / 126
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 1247 / 126

Outcome results

Primary

Primary Outcome Measure: Time in Therapeutic Range

Percent time in therapeutic range calculated by linear interpolation.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Intention to treat population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dose Assessment 4-weeklyPrimary Outcome Measure: Time in Therapeutic Range74.1 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 18.8
Dose Assessment 12-weeklyPrimary Outcome Measure: Time in Therapeutic Range71.6 percentage of timeStandard Deviation 20
Secondary

Number of Extreme INR Results

Number of INRs outside the range 1.5-4.4

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Intention to treat

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dose Assessment 4-weeklyNumber of Extreme INR Results27 Number of tests
Dose Assessment 12-weeklyNumber of Extreme INR Results17 Number of tests
Secondary

Patients With Dose Changes

Number of patients with at least one change of maintenance dose during the 12-month study period

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Intention to treat

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dose Assessment 4-weeklyPatients With Dose Changes70 participants
Dose Assessment 12-weeklyPatients With Dose Changes46 participants
Secondary

Secondary Efficacy Outcomes: Thromboembolic Events

Number of patients with any objectively verified, independently adjudicated thromboembolic event during the 12-month study period

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Intention to treat

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dose Assessment 4-weeklySecondary Efficacy Outcomes: Thromboembolic Events1 participants
Dose Assessment 12-weeklySecondary Efficacy Outcomes: Thromboembolic Events0 participants
Secondary

Secondary Safety Outcome: Major Bleeding

Number of patients with any objectively verified, independently adjudicated major bleeding event during the 12-month study period. Major bleeding was defined according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) criteria

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Intention to treat

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dose Assessment 4-weeklySecondary Safety Outcome: Major Bleeding1 participants
Dose Assessment 12-weeklySecondary Safety Outcome: Major Bleeding2 participants
Secondary

Secondary Safety Outcome: Number of Patients With Extreme INR Results

Secondary safety outcome is number of patients with at least one INR below 1.5 or above 4.4

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Intention to treat

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dose Assessment 4-weeklySecondary Safety Outcome: Number of Patients With Extreme INR Results27 participants
Dose Assessment 12-weeklySecondary Safety Outcome: Number of Patients With Extreme INR Results19 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 27, 2026