Skip to content

Comparing Fluoroscopy and Technological Methods for Guidance During Endovascular Procedures

Comparing Fluoroscopy and Technological Methods for Guidance During Endovascular Procedures Traditional Fluoroscopy Navigation Based on Preoperative CT and Intraoperative DynaCT

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00355940
Enrollment
17
Registered
2006-07-25
Start date
2007-08-31
Completion date
2010-04-30
Last updated
2013-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal

Keywords

endovascular, aortic, repair, navigation, DynaCT, position, sensor

Brief summary

The investigators want to test a navigation system for guidance during insertion of stent graft in abdominal aortic aneurysms. The navigation system consists of software developed by SINTEF Health, a custom made catheter with a micro position sensor in the tip and an emitter than induces an electromagnetic field around the patient. Preoperative CT- and intraoperative DynaCT- data are reconstructed into 3 dimensional images. The 3 dimensional images are loaded into the navigation system. Then the magnetic field, in which the patient finds himself, is calibrated with the 3 dimensional images. When the catheter is inserted into the iliac artery and aorta, the position sensor (in the tip of the catheter) is displayed in real time at the exact anatomic location in the 3 dimensional image. Null hypothesis (H0): * Insertion of stent graft is performed equally satisfactorily with fluoroscopy alone as with both fluoroscopy and new navigation technology Alternative hypothesis (H2): * Insertion of stent graft is NOT performed equally satisfactorily with fluoroscopy alone as with both fluoroscopy and new navigation technology

Interventions

DEVICETechnological Methods

Usage of technological methods and devices to improve intravascular navigation during endovascular aortic repair. In this arm we first use an optical pointer to allocate the femoral artery ramification (point of incision) and the lower renal artery (upper confinement of stent graft). Later we use an electromagnetically tracked catheter to find and enter the opening in the main stent graft before placing the second limb. For both optical and electromagnetic tracking we use a custom made navigation system based on 3 dimensional CT images

DEVICERegular Fluoroscopy

Usage of conventional fluoroscopy and angiography for intravascular navigation. In this arm standard endovascular aortic repair is performed. The only means of navigation are fluoroscopy and angiography with overlay function (standard).

Sponsors

SINTEF Health Research
CollaboratorOTHER
St. Olavs Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
The Research Council of Norway
CollaboratorOTHER
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* AAA with diameter \> 5,0 cm suitable for endovascular technique * Normal creatinine * \> 60 years of age

Exclusion criteria

* Known heart failure or unstable coronary disease * Other morbidity than normally contraindicates endovascular treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Measure the total of x-ray dose (mGy/m2)No time frame
Measure the total of contrast fluid used (ml)No time frame
Define type I leak between stent graft and aortic wallNo time frame
Measure time (s) for defining renal branchNo time frame
Measure time (s) for inserting guidewire into second limb900 sec
Number of attempts for inserting guidewire into second limb900 sec
Measure total time (min) for entire procedureNo time frame
Measure distance (mm) between stent graft and renal arteriesNo time frame
Measure difference (mm) in actual position and position in 3D image when pointing at the femoral division with an optic pointerNo time frame
Measure difference (mm) of the position of the renal arteries defined by optical pointer and angiography (both marked extracorporal with a needle)No time frame

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1 questionnaire: Can 3D image and navigation technology simplify and secure endovascular procedures?No time frame
2 questionnaire: Do you believe in further development of this technology?No time frame
3 questionnaire: Have both renal arteries unaltered flow?No time frame

Countries

Norway

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026