Skip to content

Combination Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Rhabdomyosarcoma

Randomized Study of Vincristine, Dactinomycin and Cyclophosphamide (VAC) Versus VAC Alternating With Vincristine and Irinotecan (VI) for Patients With Intermediate-Risk Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00354835
Enrollment
481
Registered
2006-07-20
Start date
2006-12-26
Completion date
2022-12-31
Last updated
2023-01-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adult Rhabdomyosarcoma, Childhood Alveolar Rhabdomyosarcoma, Childhood Botryoid-Type Embryonal Rhabdomyosarcoma, Childhood Embryonal Rhabdomyosarcoma, Localized Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Rhabdomyosarcoma, Sarcoma, Stage I Adult Soft Tissue Sarcoma AJCC v7, Stage II Adult Soft Tissue Sarcoma AJCC v7, Stage III Adult Soft Tissue Sarcoma AJCC v7

Brief summary

This randomized phase III trial is studying two different combination chemotherapy regimens to compare how well they work when given together with radiation therapy in treating patients with newly diagnosed rhabdomyosarcoma. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as vincristine sulfate, dactinomycin, cyclophosphamide, and irinotecan hydrochloride, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to kill tumor cells. Giving combination chemotherapy together with radiation therapy may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known which combination chemotherapy regimen is more effective when given together with radiation therapy in treating patients with rhabdomyosarcoma.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare the early response rates, failure-free survival (FFS), and survival of patients with intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) treated with surgery, radiotherapy, and vincristine (vincristine sulfate), dactinomycin and cyclophosphamide (VAC) or VAC alternating with vincristine, irinotecan (irinotecan hydrochloride) (VI). SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare FFS, local control, and survival of patients with intermediate-risk RMS treated with VAC and early (week 4) radiotherapy vs delayed (week 10) radiotherapy, using data from Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study (IRS)-IV for historic comparison. II. To compare the acute and late effects of VAC to VAC alternating with VI, including the toxicity associated with concurrent VI and radiotherapy. III. To compare the acute and late effects of VAC as delivered on this study to D9803 VAC. IV. To correlate change in fludeoxyglucose F-18 positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) from week 1 to week 4 and 15 with FFS. V. For VI treated patients, to correlate patient UDP glucuronosyltransferase 1 family, polypeptide A1 (UGT1A1) genotype with VI toxicity. VI. To correlate cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily B, polypeptide 6 (CYP2B6), cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily C, polypeptide 9 (CYP2C9), and glutathione S-transferase alpha 1 (GSTA1) genotypes with VAC toxicity. VII. To prospectively evaluate and validate gene expression values with the intent to define the best diagnostic predictors and more powerful prognostic classifiers. VIII. To assess the frequency of bladder dysfunction in patients with bladder, prostate, and pelvic sites of RMS 3-6 years after study enrollment. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms within 42 days of initial surgery or biopsy. ARM I (VAC): Patients receive VAC chemotherapy comprising vincristine sulfate IV over 1 minute on day 1 of weeks 1-13, 16, 19-25, 28, 31-37, and 40; dactinomycin IV over 1-5 minutes on day 1 of weeks 1, 4, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34, 37, and 40; and cyclophosphamide IV over 1 hour on day 1 of weeks 1, 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34, 37, and 40. ARM II (VAC/VI): Patients receive VAC chemotherapy alternating with VI chemotherapy comprising vincristine sulfate IV over 1 minute on day 1 of weeks 1-13,16, 17, 19, 20, 22-26, 28, 31-34, 37, 38, and 40; dactinomycin IV over 1-5 minutes on day 1 of weeks 1,13, 22, 28, 34, and 40; cyclophosphamide IV over 1 hour on day 1 of weeks 1,10, 13, 22, 28, 34, and 40; and irinotecan hydrochloride IV over 90 minutes on days 1-5 of weeks 4, 7, 16, 19, 25, 31, and 37. In both arms, treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients\* in both arms also undergo radiotherapy 5 days a week for 4-6 weeks beginning in week 4 (except patients with alveolar RMS rendered group I by amputation OR patients needing week 1 emergency radiotherapy for symptomatic spinal cord compression). NOTE: \*Individualized local control plan that deviates from protocol-mandated radiotherapy allowed for patients =\< 24 months of age. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 2-4 months for 4 years and then annually for 5-10 years.

Interventions

DRUGCyclophosphamide

Given IV

BIOLOGICALDactinomycin

Given IV

DRUGIrinotecan Hydrochloride

Given IV

OTHERLaboratory Biomarker Analysis

Correlative studies

OTHERQuestionnaire Administration

Ancillary studies

RADIATIONRadiation Therapy

Undergo radiotherapy

DRUGVincristine Sulfate

Given IV

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Children's Oncology Group
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 49 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with newly diagnosed embryonal RMS, botryoid or spindle cell variants of embryonal RMS, ectomesenchymoma, or alveolar RMS are eligible for this study * Enrollment on COG-D9902 to confirm local histologic diagnosis with central pathology review is required for all patients * Patients may be enrolled on ARST0531 and start protocol treatment prior to receipt of central pathology review results * Patient must have Intermediate-risk RMS defined as: * Embryonal, botryoid, or spindle cell RMS, or ectomesenchymoma: stage 2 or 3 and group III OR * Alveolar RMS: stage 1-3 and group I-III * Staging ipsilateral retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (SIRLND) is required for all patients \>= 10 years of age with paratesticular tumors and for patients \< 10 years with clinically or radiographically involved lymph nodes (except when extensive lymph node involvement, defined as two or more lymph nodes \> 2 cm in dimension, is identified by imaging studies) * Regional lymph node sampling or sentinel lymph node procedure is required for histologic evaluation in patients with extremity tumors * Clinically or radiographically enlarged nodes should be sampled for histologic evaluation * Detection of metastasis by optional FDG PET (not required for study enrollment); FDG PET may detect abnormalities suggestive of metastasis not identified by bone scan, computed tomography (CT), or bone marrow aspiration/biopsy; the prognostic significance of FDG PET-detected abnormalities is not clear; FDG PET-detected abnormalities MUST be confirmed to be metastases by an additional imaging modality (such as magnetic resonance imaging \[MRI\] or CT) OR pathologic confirmation; unless FDG PET abnormalities are confirmed by another imaging modality or biopsy, FDG PET abnormalities will NOT be considered evidence of metastasis * Patients must have a performance status of 0, 1, or 2; the Lansky performance score should be used for patients \< 16 years and the Karnofsky performance score for patients \>= 16 years * Patients who have received prior chemotherapy (excluding steroids) or radiation therapy, except for patients transferring from ARST0331 (low-risk study), are not eligible * Creatinine clearance or radioisotope glomerular filtration rate (GFR) \>= 70 ml/min/1.73 m\^2 or a serum creatinine based on age/gender as follows: * 1 month to \< 6 months: 0.4 mg/dL * 6 months to \< 1 year: 0.5 mg/dL * 1 to \< 2 years: 0.6 mg/dL * 2 to \< 6 years: 0.8 mgt/dL * 6 to \< 10 years: 1 mg/dL * 10 to \< 13 years: 1.2 mg/dL * 13 to \< 16 years: 1.5 mg/dL (males) or 1.4 mg/dL (females) * \>= 16 years: 1.7 mg/dL (males) or 1.4 mg/dL (females) * Patients with urinary tract obstruction by tumor must meet the renal function criteria AND must have unimpeded urinary flow established via decompression of the obstructed portion of the urinary tract * Total bilirubin =\< 1.5 x upper limit of normal for age * Peripheral absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \>= 750/uL * Platelet count \>= 75,000/uL (transfusion independent) * No evidence of uncontrolled infection * Patients must be able to undergo radiation therapy, if necessary, as specified in the protocol * Female patients of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test * Female patients who are breast feeding must agree to stop breast feeding * Sexually active patients of childbearing potential must be willing to use effective contraception during therapy and for at least 1 month after treatment is completed * All patients and/or their parents or legal guardians must sign a written informed consent * All institutional, Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and National Cancer Institute (NCI) requirements for human studies must be met

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Survival (OS)4 yearsProbability of being alive after 4 years in the study.
Event Free Survival (EFS)4 yearsProbability of no relapse, secondary malignancy, or death after 4 year in the study
Response Rate (RR)Reporting Period 1 (Weeks 1 - 15)Proportion of patients with complete or partial response. Complete Response (CR): Complete disappearance of the tumor confirmed at \> 4 weeks; Partial Response (PR): At least 64% decrease in volume compared to the baseline; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of ToxicityUp to 15 weeksGrade 3 or 4 nausea, diarrhea, dehydration, radiation dermatitis, mucositis due to radiation. Severe and undesirable adverse event is considered as grade 3; Life-threatening or disabling adverse event is grade 4. Grade 4 is worse than grade 3.
Acute and Late Effects of VAC as Delivered on This Study to D9803 VACUp to 43 weeksThe toxicity rates will be estimated for each phase and course of treatment, and will be compared to the fixed rates under D9803 using one-sided lower confidence intervals for a single proportion without adjustment for multiple comparisons.
Compare Event Free Survival (EFS) With Respect to the Level of % Change in FDG PET Maximum Standard Uptake Value (SUVmax) at Week 44 years4-year EFS (probability of no relapse, secondary malignancy, or death after 4 years in the study).
Compare Event Free Survival (EFS) With Respect to the Level of % Change in FDG PET Maximum Standard Uptake Value (SUVmax) at Week 154 years4-year EFS (probability of no relapse, secondary malignancy, or death after 4 years in the study)
Event Free Survival (EFS) Probability VAC and Early (Week 4) Radiotherapy Compared to Delayed (Week 10) Radiotherapy, Using IRSIV for Historic Comparison4 yearsCompare 4-year EFS using eligible participants only to the historical rate of 0.65 with IRSI-V. The 4-year EFS is probability of no relapse, secondary malignancy, or death after 4 years in the study. The Delayed (Week 10) Radiotherapy is from IRSI-V, and the number of participants of IRSI-V is unknown, but we have the rate of 0.65.
Toxicity With CYP2B6 GenotypesDuring the studyIncidence of toxicity related to VAC treatment in patients with CYP2B6 genotypes.
Toxicity With GSTA1 and CYP2C9 GenotypesDuring the studyIncidence of toxicity related to VAC treatment in patients with GSTA1 and CYP2C9 genotypes.
Event Free Survival (EFS) by PAX Status4 years
Incidence of Bladder Dysfunction3-6 years after enrollmentNumber of patients with a summary score greater than 8.5
Incidence of Toxicity Related to VI Treatment in Patients With UGT1A1 GenotypeWeeks 4-9 (the first exposure to VI)Severe and undesirable adverse event is considered as grade 3; Life-threatening or disabling adverse event is grade 4. Grade 4 is worse than grade 3.
Local Failure2 yearsCompare 2-year local failure rate to the historical rate of 0.13 with IRSI-V. The Delayed (Week 10) Radiotherapy is from IRSI-V, and the number of participants of IRSI-V is unknown, but we have the rate of 0.13.
Overall Survival (OS) Probability VAC and Early (Week 4) Radiotherapy Compared to Delayed (Week 10) Radiotherapy, Using IRSIV for Historic Comparison4 yearsCompare 4-year OS using eligible participants only to the historical rate of 0.70 with IRSI-V. The 4-year OS is probability of being alive after 4 years in the study. The Delayed (Week 10) Radiotherapy is from IRSI-V, and the number of participants of IRSI-V is unknown, but we have the rate of 0.70.

Countries

Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Puerto Rico, Switzerland, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

481 excludes 33 ineligible cases (declared by the Study Chair) .

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Vincristine, Dactinomycin, Cyclophosphamide (VAC)
Patients receive VAC chemotherapy comprising vincristine IV over 1 minute on day 1 of weeks 1-13, 16, 19-25, 28, 31-37, and 40; dactinomycin IV over 1-5 minutes on day 1 of weeks 1, 4, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34, 37,and 40; and cyclophosphamide IV over 1 hour on day 1 of weeks 1, 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34, 37, and 40. Patients may also undergo radiotherapy 5 days a week for 4-6 weeks beginning in week 4.
239
VAC Alternating With Vincristine, Irinotecan (VI)
Patients receive VAC chemotherapy alternating with VI chemotherapy comprising vincristine IV over 1 minute on day 1 of weeks 1-13, 16, 17, 19, 20, 22-26, 28, 31-34, 37, 38, and 40; dactinomycin IV over 1-5 minutes on day 1 of weeks 1, 13, 22, 28, 34, and 40; cyclophosphamide IV over 1 hour on day 1 of weeks 1,10, 13, 22, 28, 34, and 40; and irinotecan hydrochloride IV over 1 hour on days 1-5 of weeks 4, 7, 16, 19, 25, 31, and 37. Patients may also undergo radiotherapy 5 days a week for 4-6 weeks beginning in week 4.
242
Total481

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event60
Overall StudyDeath11
Overall StudyDisease progression or relapse1522
Overall StudyIneligible1716
Overall StudyPhysician Decision813
Overall StudyRefusal of further therapy38
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject21

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicVAC Alternating With Vincristine, Irinotecan (VI)TotalVincristine, Dactinomycin, Cyclophosphamide (VAC)
Age, Continuous97.86 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 82.66
93.88 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 78.21
89.85 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 73.39
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
28 Participants67 Participants39 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
204 Participants395 Participants191 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
10 Participants19 Participants9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
7 Participants14 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
29 Participants66 Participants37 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
23 Participants51 Participants28 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
181 Participants346 Participants165 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
113 Participants222 Participants109 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
129 Participants259 Participants130 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
209 / 222213 / 226
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 22211 / 226

Outcome results

Primary

Event Free Survival (EFS)

Probability of no relapse, secondary malignancy, or death after 4 year in the study

Time frame: 4 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Vincristine, Dactinomycin, Cyclophosphamide (VAC)Event Free Survival (EFS)0.6255 Probability
VAC Alternating With Vincristine, Irinotecan (VI)Event Free Survival (EFS)0.5874 Probability
Primary

Overall Survival (OS)

Probability of being alive after 4 years in the study.

Time frame: 4 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Vincristine, Dactinomycin, Cyclophosphamide (VAC)Overall Survival (OS)0.7293 Probability
VAC Alternating With Vincristine, Irinotecan (VI)Overall Survival (OS)0.7223 Probability
Primary

Response Rate (RR)

Proportion of patients with complete or partial response. Complete Response (CR): Complete disappearance of the tumor confirmed at \> 4 weeks; Partial Response (PR): At least 64% decrease in volume compared to the baseline; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.

Time frame: Reporting Period 1 (Weeks 1 - 15)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Vincristine, Dactinomycin, Cyclophosphamide (VAC)Response Rate (RR)0.6667 Proportion
VAC Alternating With Vincristine, Irinotecan (VI)Response Rate (RR)0.6726 Proportion
Secondary

Acute and Late Effects of VAC as Delivered on This Study to D9803 VAC

The toxicity rates will be estimated for each phase and course of treatment, and will be compared to the fixed rates under D9803 using one-sided lower confidence intervals for a single proportion without adjustment for multiple comparisons.

Time frame: Up to 43 weeks

Population: Number of patients with specific adverse events.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Vincristine, Dactinomycin, Cyclophosphamide (VAC)Acute and Late Effects of VAC as Delivered on This Study to D9803 VACFebrile Neutropenia30 participants
Vincristine, Dactinomycin, Cyclophosphamide (VAC)Acute and Late Effects of VAC as Delivered on This Study to D9803 VACPlatelet Count Decreased27 participants
Vincristine, Dactinomycin, Cyclophosphamide (VAC)Acute and Late Effects of VAC as Delivered on This Study to D9803 VACNausea or Hepatopathy6 participants
Vincristine, Dactinomycin, Cyclophosphamide (VAC)Acute and Late Effects of VAC as Delivered on This Study to D9803 VACVomiting9 participants
Vincristine, Dactinomycin, Cyclophosphamide (VAC)Acute and Late Effects of VAC as Delivered on This Study to D9803 VACAnemia58 participants
VAC Alternating With Vincristine, Irinotecan (VI)Acute and Late Effects of VAC as Delivered on This Study to D9803 VACVomiting2 participants
VAC Alternating With Vincristine, Irinotecan (VI)Acute and Late Effects of VAC as Delivered on This Study to D9803 VACAnemia54 participants
VAC Alternating With Vincristine, Irinotecan (VI)Acute and Late Effects of VAC as Delivered on This Study to D9803 VACFebrile Neutropenia17 participants
VAC Alternating With Vincristine, Irinotecan (VI)Acute and Late Effects of VAC as Delivered on This Study to D9803 VACNausea or Hepatopathy1 participants
VAC Alternating With Vincristine, Irinotecan (VI)Acute and Late Effects of VAC as Delivered on This Study to D9803 VACPlatelet Count Decreased63 participants
Comparison: Compare incidence of Anemia to historical rate of 0.40 from D9803, which is Randomized Study of VCR, Actinomycin-D, and CPM (VAC) vs. VAC alternating with VCR, Topotecan, and CPM (VTC) for Patients with Intermediate Risk RMS. Comparing the incidence of anemia with VAC on ARST0531 to the historical rate of 0.40 with VAC on D9803. The 95% one-sided confidence interval for the incidence of anemia will be calculated and evaluated to see if the interval contains the null rate of 0.40.
Comparison: Compare incidence of Nausea or Hepatopathy to historical rate of 0.05 from D9803, which is Randomized Study of VCR, Actinomycin-D, and CPM (VAC) vs. VAC alternating with VCR, Topotecan, and CPM (VTC) for Patients with Intermediate Risk RMS. The 95% one-sided confidence interval for the incidence of nausea or hepatopathy will be calculated and evaluated to see if the interval contains the null rate of 0.05.
Comparison: Compare incidence of Febrile Neutropenia to historical rate of 0.50 from D9803, which is Randomized Study of VCR, Actinomycin-D, and CPM (VAC) vs. VAC alternating with VCR, Topotecan, and CPM (VTC) for Patients with Intermediate Risk RMS. The 95% one-sided confidence interval for the incidence of febrile neutropenia will be calculated and evaluated to see if the interval contains the null rate of 0.50.
Comparison: Compare incidence of Platelet Count Decreased to historical rate of 0.70 from D9803, which is Randomized Study of VCR, Actinomycin-D, and CPM (VAC) vs. VAC alternating with VCR, Topotecan, and CPM (VTC) for Patients with Intermediate Risk RMS. The 95% one-sided confidence interval for the incidence of platelet count decreased will be calculated and evaluated to see if the interval contains the null rate of 0.70.
Comparison: Compare incidence of Vomiting to historical rate of 0.15 from D9803, which is Randomized Study of VCR, Actinomycin-D, and CPM (VAC) vs. VAC alternating with VCR, Topotecan, and CPM (VTC) for Patients with Intermediate Risk RMS. The 95% one-sided confidence interval for the incidence of vomiting will be calculated and evaluated to see if the interval contains the null rate of 0.15.
Comparison: Compare incidence of Anemia to historical rate of 0.40 from D9803, which is Randomized Study of VCR, Actinomycin-D, and CPM (VAC) vs. VAC alternating with VCR, Topotecan, and CPM (VTC) for Patients with Intermediate Risk RMS. 95% one-sided confidence interval for the incidence of anemia will be calculated and evaluated to see if the interval contains the null rate of 0.40.
Comparison: Compare incidence of Nausea or Hepatopathy to historical rate of 0.05 from D9803, which is Randomized Study of VCR, Actinomycin-D, and CPM (VAC) vs. VAC alternating with VCR, Topotecan, and CPM (VTC) for Patients with Intermediate Risk RMS. The 95% one-sided confidence interval for the incidence of nausea or hepatopathy will be calculated and evaluated to see if the interval contains the null rate of 0.05.
Comparison: Compare incidence of Febrile Neutropenia to historical rate of 0.50 from D9803, which is Randomized Study of VCR, Actinomycin-D, and CPM (VAC) vs. VAC alternating with VCR, Topotecan, and CPM (VTC) for Patients with Intermediate Risk RMS. The 95% one-sided confidence interval for the incidence of febrile neutropenia will be calculated and evaluated to see if the interval contains the null rate of 0.50.
Comparison: Compare incidence of Platelet Count Decreased to historical rate of 0.70 from D9803, which is Randomized Study of VCR, Actinomycin-D, and CPM (VAC) vs. VAC alternating with VCR, Topotecan, and CPM (VTC) for Patients with Intermediate Risk RMS. The 95% one-sided confidence interval for the incidence of platelet count decreased will be calculated and evaluated to see if the interval contains the null rate of 0.70.
Comparison: Compare incidence of Vomiting to historical rate of 0.15 from D9803, which is Randomized Study of VCR, Actinomycin-D, and CPM (VAC) vs. VAC alternating with VCR, Topotecan, and CPM (VTC) for Patients with Intermediate Risk RMS. The 95% one-sided confidence interval for the incidence of vomiting will be calculated and evaluated to see if the interval contains the null rate of 0.15.
Secondary

Compare Event Free Survival (EFS) With Respect to the Level of % Change in FDG PET Maximum Standard Uptake Value (SUVmax) at Week 15

4-year EFS (probability of no relapse, secondary malignancy, or death after 4 years in the study)

Time frame: 4 years

Population: 421 participants were excluded due to ineligibility or absence of SUVmax evaluation at baseline and week 15.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Vincristine, Dactinomycin, Cyclophosphamide (VAC)Compare Event Free Survival (EFS) With Respect to the Level of % Change in FDG PET Maximum Standard Uptake Value (SUVmax) at Week 150.6667 Probability
VAC Alternating With Vincristine, Irinotecan (VI)Compare Event Free Survival (EFS) With Respect to the Level of % Change in FDG PET Maximum Standard Uptake Value (SUVmax) at Week 150.5686 Probability
Secondary

Compare Event Free Survival (EFS) With Respect to the Level of % Change in FDG PET Maximum Standard Uptake Value (SUVmax) at Week 4

4-year EFS (probability of no relapse, secondary malignancy, or death after 4 years in the study).

Time frame: 4 years

Population: 452 participants were excluded due to ineligibility or absence of SUVmax evaluation at baseline and week 4.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Vincristine, Dactinomycin, Cyclophosphamide (VAC)Compare Event Free Survival (EFS) With Respect to the Level of % Change in FDG PET Maximum Standard Uptake Value (SUVmax) at Week 40.2857 Probability
VAC Alternating With Vincristine, Irinotecan (VI)Compare Event Free Survival (EFS) With Respect to the Level of % Change in FDG PET Maximum Standard Uptake Value (SUVmax) at Week 40.6364 Probability
Secondary

Event Free Survival (EFS) by PAX Status

Time frame: 4 years

Population: Only eligible patients who were tested for their fusion status and PAX partners.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Vincristine, Dactinomycin, Cyclophosphamide (VAC)Event Free Survival (EFS) by PAX Status0.51 Probability
VAC Alternating With Vincristine, Irinotecan (VI)Event Free Survival (EFS) by PAX Status0.66 Probability
Secondary

Event Free Survival (EFS) Probability VAC and Early (Week 4) Radiotherapy Compared to Delayed (Week 10) Radiotherapy, Using IRSIV for Historic Comparison

Compare 4-year EFS using eligible participants only to the historical rate of 0.65 with IRSI-V. The 4-year EFS is probability of no relapse, secondary malignancy, or death after 4 years in the study. The Delayed (Week 10) Radiotherapy is from IRSI-V, and the number of participants of IRSI-V is unknown, but we have the rate of 0.65.

Time frame: 4 years

Population: 17 ineligible participants were excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Vincristine, Dactinomycin, Cyclophosphamide (VAC)Event Free Survival (EFS) Probability VAC and Early (Week 4) Radiotherapy Compared to Delayed (Week 10) Radiotherapy, Using IRSIV for Historic Comparison0.6255 Probability
Secondary

Incidence of Bladder Dysfunction

Number of patients with a summary score greater than 8.5

Time frame: 3-6 years after enrollment

Population: 470 participants were excluded due to ineligibility or absence of the dysfunctional voiding and incontinence symptoms questionnaire.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Vincristine, Dactinomycin, Cyclophosphamide (VAC)Incidence of Bladder Dysfunction2 Participant
VAC Alternating With Vincristine, Irinotecan (VI)Incidence of Bladder Dysfunction1 Participant
Secondary

Incidence of Toxicity

Grade 3 or 4 nausea, diarrhea, dehydration, radiation dermatitis, mucositis due to radiation. Severe and undesirable adverse event is considered as grade 3; Life-threatening or disabling adverse event is grade 4. Grade 4 is worse than grade 3.

Time frame: Up to 15 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Vincristine, Dactinomycin, Cyclophosphamide (VAC)Incidence of Toxicity0.2072 Probability
VAC Alternating With Vincristine, Irinotecan (VI)Incidence of Toxicity0.3673 Probability
Secondary

Incidence of Toxicity Related to VI Treatment in Patients With UGT1A1 Genotype

Severe and undesirable adverse event is considered as grade 3; Life-threatening or disabling adverse event is grade 4. Grade 4 is worse than grade 3.

Time frame: Weeks 4-9 (the first exposure to VI)

Population: Ineligible patients are excluded. Only patients tested for the UGT1A1 genotypes are reported and included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Vincristine, Dactinomycin, Cyclophosphamide (VAC)Incidence of Toxicity Related to VI Treatment in Patients With UGT1A1 GenotypeNeutropenia, with or without Fever16 Counts
Vincristine, Dactinomycin, Cyclophosphamide (VAC)Incidence of Toxicity Related to VI Treatment in Patients With UGT1A1 GenotypeDiarrhea5 Counts
VAC Alternating With Vincristine, Irinotecan (VI)Incidence of Toxicity Related to VI Treatment in Patients With UGT1A1 GenotypeNeutropenia, with or without Fever22 Counts
VAC Alternating With Vincristine, Irinotecan (VI)Incidence of Toxicity Related to VI Treatment in Patients With UGT1A1 GenotypeDiarrhea14 Counts
UGT1A1 Genotype 7/7Incidence of Toxicity Related to VI Treatment in Patients With UGT1A1 GenotypeNeutropenia, with or without Fever4 Counts
UGT1A1 Genotype 7/7Incidence of Toxicity Related to VI Treatment in Patients With UGT1A1 GenotypeDiarrhea5 Counts
Comparison: The incidences of grade 3 or higher neutropenia, with or without fever between UGT1A1 Genotypes (6/6, 6/7, 7/7) were compared by the Fisher's exact test.p-value: 0.99Fisher Exact
Comparison: The incidences of grade 3 or higher diarrhea between UGT1A1 Genotypes (6/6, 6/7, 7/7) were compared by Fisher's exact test.p-value: 0.036Fisher Exact
Secondary

Local Failure

Compare 2-year local failure rate to the historical rate of 0.13 with IRSI-V. The Delayed (Week 10) Radiotherapy is from IRSI-V, and the number of participants of IRSI-V is unknown, but we have the rate of 0.13.

Time frame: 2 years

Population: 17 ineligible participants were excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Vincristine, Dactinomycin, Cyclophosphamide (VAC)Local Failure0.1757 Proportion of participants
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS) Probability VAC and Early (Week 4) Radiotherapy Compared to Delayed (Week 10) Radiotherapy, Using IRSIV for Historic Comparison

Compare 4-year OS using eligible participants only to the historical rate of 0.70 with IRSI-V. The 4-year OS is probability of being alive after 4 years in the study. The Delayed (Week 10) Radiotherapy is from IRSI-V, and the number of participants of IRSI-V is unknown, but we have the rate of 0.70.

Time frame: 4 years

Population: 17 ineligible participants were excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Vincristine, Dactinomycin, Cyclophosphamide (VAC)Overall Survival (OS) Probability VAC and Early (Week 4) Radiotherapy Compared to Delayed (Week 10) Radiotherapy, Using IRSIV for Historic Comparison0.7293 Probability
Secondary

Toxicity With CYP2B6 Genotypes

Incidence of toxicity related to VAC treatment in patients with CYP2B6 genotypes.

Time frame: During the study

Population: The analysis was abandoned due to low incidence of toxicity. Data were not collected.

Secondary

Toxicity With GSTA1 and CYP2C9 Genotypes

Incidence of toxicity related to VAC treatment in patients with GSTA1 and CYP2C9 genotypes.

Time frame: During the study

Population: The analysis was abandoned due to low incidence of toxicity. Data were not collected.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026