Skip to content

Analgetic and Anxiolytic Effect of Preoperative Pregabalin

Analgetic and Anxiolytic Effect of Preoperative Pregabalin in Patients Undergoing Surgery of the Vertebral Columna

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00353704
Enrollment
50
Registered
2006-07-19
Start date
2005-11-30
Completion date
2010-06-30
Last updated
2011-07-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Disk Prolapse, Intervertebral Disk Displacement

Keywords

Intervertebral disk displacement, disk prolapse, pregabalin

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the use of oral pregabalin 150 mg as premedication reduces the amount and degree of postoperative pain. Furthermore the purpose of this study is to determine whether the use of oral pregabalin 150 mg as premedication reduces anxiety prior to anaesthesia in these patients.

Detailed description

The mechanism of development of postoperative pain is complex. Central and peripheral sensitization are playing an important role and this can lead to postoperative hypersensitization. Several studies have shown, that gabapentin can be effective to reduce sensitization and postoperative pain. Pregabalin (S-aminomethyl-5-methylhexaninacid) is a further development of gabapentin. Pregabalin has a fewer side-effects compared with gabapentin. The purpose of this study is to compare the analgetic and anxiolytic effect of pregabalin and placebo used as premedication. The hypothesis is that a single-dose pregabalin (150 mg postoperatively (p.o.)) gives significant better anxiolysis and analgesia than placebo. The study is including patients undergoing surgery of the vertebral columna.

Interventions

DRUGpregabalin

capsule 150 mg x 1 per orally one hour before surgery

DRUGPlacebo

One capsule of saccharose (placebo) was administered about one hour before surgery

DRUGmorphine

All patients were equipped with a PCA (patient controlled analgesia) for 24 hours after surgery. The sum of morphine used was registered (milligram).

Sponsors

Asker & Baerum Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of disc prolapse * Age 18+ * ASA (American Association in Anesthesiology) I-III * written consent

Exclusion criteria

* Age \< 18 * ASA \> III * liver failure * renal failure * allergic reaction against gabapentin and/or pregabalin * pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean VAS Pain (Visual Analogue Scale)at Rest (0-100 mm)120 minutes after surgeryThe visual analogue scale (VAS) was used for registration of the pain intensity at rest. The score ranges from 0-100, where 0 means no pain and 100 means maximal pain. Higher values represent a worse outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Morphine (Opioid) Consumption Cumulated240 minutesPatients were equipped with a morphine PCA (patient controlled analgesia) for 24 hours after surgery. So they could administrate morphine intravenously by pressing a button. The sum of morphine was registered as cumulated opioid consumption (milligram)

Countries

Norway

Participant flow

Recruitment details

recruitment period november 2005 until june 2008

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Pregabalin25
Placebo25
Total50

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyProtocol Violation31

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboPregabalinTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
25 Participants25 Participants50 Participants
Age Continuous43 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
44 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
43 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
Region of Enrollment
Norway
25 participants25 participants50 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
12 Participants12 Participants24 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants13 Participants26 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 220 / 24
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 220 / 24

Outcome results

Primary

Mean VAS Pain (Visual Analogue Scale)at Rest (0-100 mm)

The visual analogue scale (VAS) was used for registration of the pain intensity at rest. The score ranges from 0-100, where 0 means no pain and 100 means maximal pain. Higher values represent a worse outcome.

Time frame: 120 minutes after surgery

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PregabalinMean VAS Pain (Visual Analogue Scale)at Rest (0-100 mm)11.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.6
PlaceboMean VAS Pain (Visual Analogue Scale)at Rest (0-100 mm)22.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.4
Secondary

Morphine (Opioid) Consumption Cumulated

Patients were equipped with a morphine PCA (patient controlled analgesia) for 24 hours after surgery. So they could administrate morphine intravenously by pressing a button. The sum of morphine was registered as cumulated opioid consumption (milligram)

Time frame: 240 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PregabalinMorphine (Opioid) Consumption Cumulated7.3 mgStandard Deviation 6.3
PlaceboMorphine (Opioid) Consumption Cumulated16.0 mgStandard Deviation 13.2

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026