Skip to content

Hyperglycemia in Surgical Infections

Studies on Hyperglycemia in Surgical Infections

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00353275
Enrollment
5
Registered
2006-07-18
Start date
2009-08-31
Completion date
2011-07-31
Last updated
2018-11-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Necrotizing Fasciitis

Keywords

Strict glycemic control

Brief summary

The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate two glycemic control regimens on clinical outcome in patients with necrotizing soft tissue infections. Secondary aim is to evaluate the inflammatory and immune responses to the glycemic control regimens.

Detailed description

This is a multi-center explanatory trial of strict glycemic control for surgical patients with necrotizing soft tissue infection (NSTI). The primary objective of this study is to verify feasibility of the intervention, provide unbiased and evidence-based estimates of treatment effects, and obtain data needed to design and direct a larger multi-center trial if necessary. The multi-center trial (n \>100) will have adequate power to identify a 30% difference in favorable outcome defined as discharge alive from the hospital without an amputation in less than the median number of hospital days. Secondary objectives include evaluation of specific hypotheses relating the intervention to cytokine and neutrophil responses. These preliminary data will provide the basis for future research and grant applications, lend insight into the mechanisms by which hyperglycemia results in adverse effects, and improve outcome through the development of evidence-based therapeutic strategies for patient care.

Interventions

Blood glucose target range is 80-110 mg/dL.

Blood glucose target range is 110-140 mg/dL.

Sponsors

National Institutes of Health (NIH)
CollaboratorNIH
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients will be enrolled at one of the following centers: the LBJ General Hospital (UT-Houston), the Ben Taub General Hospital (Baylor Houston), The Methodist Hospital (Texas Medical Center), or the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio and the Brooke Army Medical Center. * We will attempt to enroll all eligible patients with a diagnosis of a necrotizing soft tissue infection (NSTI), including Fournier's gangrene, confirmed in the operating room regardless of age, ethnicity or gender.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant patients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Infectious MorbidityDuration of hospital stay, an average of 2 weeks
Composite Outcome (Favorable Outcome Defined as Discharge Home, Without an Amputation, in Less Than the Median Hospital Stay for Survivors)Duration of hospital stay

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Organ FailureDuration of hospital stay
HypoglycemiaDuration of hospital stay

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Strict Glycemic Control
Blood glucose target range is 80-110 mg/dL.
2
Conventional Glycemic Control
Blood glucose target range is 110-140 mg/dL.
3
Total5

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicStrict Glycemic ControlConventional Glycemic ControlTotal
Age, Continuous59 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
59 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
59 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
Height66 inches65 inches66 inches
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
2 participants3 participants5 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Weight169 pounds240 pounds212 pounds

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 20 / 3
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 20 / 3

Outcome results

Primary

Composite Outcome (Favorable Outcome Defined as Discharge Home, Without an Amputation, in Less Than the Median Hospital Stay for Survivors)

Time frame: Duration of hospital stay

Population: The study was stopped because it appeared we would not be able to enroll enough patients into the study by the time funding would conclude. Because only a total of 5 patients were enrolled and underwent study procedures, there was not enough data to be analyzed.

Primary

Infectious Morbidity

Time frame: Duration of hospital stay, an average of 2 weeks

Population: The study was stopped because it appeared we would not be able to enroll enough patients into the study by the time funding would conclude. Because only a total of 5 patients were enrolled and underwent study procedures, there was not enough data to be analyzed.

Secondary

Hypoglycemia

Time frame: Duration of hospital stay

Population: The study was stopped because it appeared we would not be able to enroll enough patients into the study by the time funding would conclude. Because only a total of 5 patients were enrolled and underwent study procedures, there was not enough data to be analyzed.

Secondary

Organ Failure

Time frame: Duration of hospital stay

Population: The study was stopped because it appeared we would not be able to enroll enough patients into the study by the time funding would conclude. Because only a total of 5 patients were enrolled and underwent study procedures, there was not enough data to be analyzed.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026