Hodgkin's Lymphoma
Conditions
Keywords
Hodgkin's Disease
Brief summary
The main purpose of this protocol is to estimate the percentage of patients with intermediate risk Hodgkin lymphoma who will survive free of disease (Event-free survival) for three years after treatment with multi-agent chemotherapy (Stanford V) and low-dose, tailored-field radiation therapy. The hypothesis being studied is that this treatment will result in more than 80% of patients being alive and free of disease three years after starting treatment.
Detailed description
Treatment Plan Description: Adriamycin 25 mg/m2 IV Day 1 of weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 Vinblastine 6 mg/m2 IV Day 1 of weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 Nitrogen Mustard 6mg/m2 IV on Day 1 of weeks 1, 5, and 9 Cyclophosphamide 650 mg/m2 IV Day 1 of weeks 1, 5, 9(when Nitrogen Mustard was not available due to national shortage) Vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 IV Day 1 of weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 Bleomycin 5 units/m2 IV Day 1 of weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 Etoposide 60 mg/m2 IV Days 1,2 of weeks 3, 7, 11 Prednisone\* 40 mg/m2/day divided in 3 doses PO Every other day of weeks 1-12 G-CSF (only as needed in case of severe myelo-suppression requiring treatment delay) 5 mcg/kg SC Days 3-13, 16-26, 29-39, 42-52, 55-65, 68-78 (as clinically indicated) \* Prednisone taper is foreseen for the last 2 weeks of therapy. Patients will be treated with 12 weeks of Stanford V chemotherapy in the schedule outlined above. Patients will then receive radiation therapy after completion of 12 weeks of chemotherapy. The radiation dose to individual nodal sites will be based on response after 8 weeks of chemotherapy: 15 Gy for areas achieving a complete response and 25.5 Gy achieving less than a complete response, or patients with bulky mediastinal mass.
Interventions
Given IV, Day 1 of weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11.
Given IV, Day 1 of weeks 1, 5 and 9. Cyclophosphamide may be substituted if nitrogen mustard is unavailable.
Given IV on Day 1 of weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11.
May be substituted if nitrogen mustard is unavailable. Given on Day 1 of weeks 1, 5 and 9.
Given IV on Day 1 of weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12.
Given IV on Day 1 of weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12.
Given IV on Days 1 and 2 of weeks 1-10.
Given PO every other day of weeks 1-12.
Given subcutaneously days 3-13, 16-26, 29-39, 42-52, 55-65, and 68-78 (as clinically indicated).
Participants receive radiotherapy after completion of 12 weeks of Stanford V chemotherapy.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Patient is less than or equal to 21 years of age * Patient has a confirmed diagnosis of previously untreated Hodgkin lymphoma * Has Ann Arbor stage IB, IIIA, or IA/IIA with extranodal extension, multiple nodal involvement (3 or more sites), or bulky mediastinal adenopathy.
Exclusion criteria
* Patients with favorable risk features * Patients with unfavorable risk features * Patients who have received prior therapy for Hodgkin lymphoma.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 3-year Event-Free Survival Probability | 3 years | The survival probability for the time interval from treatment start to the time of the first failure (disease recurrence, second malignancy or death) within a 3-year time frame. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Disease Failure Rate Within Radiation Fields | 3 years | Defined as disease that recurs in the initially involved nodal region within the field of irradiation. The disease failure rate within the radiation fields will be estimated with a 95% confidence interval using appropriate methods (e.g., estimate cumulative incidence in the presence of competing risks). |
| Local and Distant Failure for Children Treated With Tailored-field Radiation | from first enrollment date up to 3 years follow-up | The cumulative incidence of local and distant failure will be estimated. Effect of competing risks will be taken into account. Local failure is defined as in-field, and distant failure is defined as out-of-field. |
| Prognostic Factors for Treatment Failure: Age | 5.5 (years) median follow-up with minimum 0.3 to maximum 9.4 years follow-up | Age was examined for the association with event-free survival (EFS) which was defined as the interval between date on study and date of relapse/disease progression, second malignant tumor, death, or last contact, whichever came first. Given only 11 events, the investigators used univariate Cox model with Score test to compute the p value for the statistical significance. |
| Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Total Score | At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy | Patient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. |
| Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQl v.4.0: Physical Functioning | At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy | Patient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. |
| Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Psychosocial Health | At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy | Patient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. |
| Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0:Social Functioning | At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy | Patient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. |
| Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: School Functioning | At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy | Patient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. |
| Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Total Score | At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy | Patient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. |
| Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Pain and Hurt | At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy | Patient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. |
| Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Nausea | At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy | Patient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. |
| Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Procedural Anxiety | At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy | Patient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. |
| Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Treatment Anxiety | At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy | Patient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. |
| Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Worry | At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy | Patient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. |
| Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Cognitive Problems | At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy | Patient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. |
| Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Perceived Physical Appearance | At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy | Patient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. |
| Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Communication | At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy | Patient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. |
| Patient Quality of Life (QoL), Symptom Distress Scale | At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy | The patient's degree of discomfort from specific treatment-related symptoms across multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50. |
| Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Total Score | At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy | Parent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. |
| Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Physical Functioning | At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy | Parent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. |
| Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Psychosocial Health | At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy | Parent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. |
| Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Emotional Functioning | At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy | Parent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. |
| Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Social Functioning | At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy | Parent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. |
| Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: School Functioning | At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy | Parent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. |
| Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Total Score | At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy | Parent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. |
| Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Pain and Hurt | At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy | Parent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. |
| Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Nausea | At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy | Parent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. |
| Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Procedural Anxiety | At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy | Parent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. |
| Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Treatment Anxiety | At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy | Parent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. |
| 3-year Overall Survival (OS) Probability | 3-years | Comparison of the 3-year OS probability along with the whole OS distributions of intermediate risk patients treated with Stanford V chemotherapy low dose tailored-field radiation to those patients on HOD99. |
| Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Worry | At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy | Parent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. |
| Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Cognitive Problems | At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy | Parent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. |
| Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Perceived Physical Appearance | At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy | Parent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. |
| Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Communication | At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy | Parent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. |
| Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Total Score | At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy | Assess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score. |
| Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Physical Functioning | At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy | Assess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score. |
| Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Psychosocial Health | At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy | Assess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score. |
| Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Emotional Functioning | At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy | Assess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score. |
| Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Social Functioning | At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy | Assess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score. |
| Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: School Functioning | At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy | Assess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score. |
| Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Total Score | At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy | Assess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score. |
| Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Pain and Hurt | At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy | Assess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score. |
| Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Nausea | At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy | Assess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score. |
| Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Procedural Anxiety | At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy | Assess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score. |
| Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Treatment Anxiety | At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy | Assess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score. |
| Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Worry | At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy | Assess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score. |
| Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Cognitive Problems | At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy | Assess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score. |
| Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Perceived Physical Appearance | At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy | Assess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score. |
| Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Communication | At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy | Assess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score. |
| Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.4.0: Total Score | 6 months after the completion of therapy | Relationship between quality of life and symptom distress instruments aggregated across multiple time points \[At diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50. |
| Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.4.0: Physical Functioning | 6 months after the completion of therapy | Relationship between quality of life and symptom distress instruments aggregated across multiple time points \[At diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50. |
| Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.4.0: Psychosocial Health | 6 months after the completion of therapy | Relationship between quality of life and symptom distress instruments aggregated across multiple time points \[At diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50. |
| Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.4.0: Emotional Functioning | 6 months after the completion of therapy | Relationship between quality of life and symptom distress instruments aggregated across multiple time points \[At diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50. |
| Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.4.0: Social Functioning | 6 months after the completion of therapy | Relationship between quality of life and symptom distress instruments aggregated across multiple time points \[At diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50. |
| Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Procedural Anxiety | 6 months after the completion of therapy | Relationship between quality of life and symptom distress across multiple time points \[completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50. |
| Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.4.0: School Functioning | 6 months after the completion of therapy | Relationship between quality of life and symptom distress instruments aggregated across multiple time points \[At diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50. |
| Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Total Score | 6 months after the completion of therapy | Relationship between quality of life and symptom distress across multiple time points \[completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50. |
| Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Pain and Hurt | 6 months after the completion of therapy | Relationship between quality of life and symptom distress across multiple time points \[completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50. |
| Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Nausea | 6 months after the completion of therapy | Relationship between quality of life and symptom distress across multiple time points \[completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50. |
| Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Treatment Anxiety | 6 months after the completion of therapy | Relationship between quality of life and symptom distress across multiple time points \[completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50. |
| Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Worry | 6 months after the completion of therapy | Relationship between quality of life and symptom distress across multiple time points \[completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50. |
| Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Cognitive Problems | 6 months after the completion of therapy | Relationship between quality of life and symptom distress across multiple time points \[completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50. |
| Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Perceived Physical Appearance | 6 months after the completion of therapy | Relationship between quality of life and symptom distress across multiple time points \[completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50. |
| Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Communication | 6 months after the completion of therapy | Relationship between quality of life and symptom distress across multiple time points \[completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50. |
| 3-year Event-free Survival (EFS) Probability | 3 years | Comparison of thee-year EFS probability along with the whole EFS distributions of intermediate risk patients treated with Stanford V chemotherapy low dose tailored-field radiation to those patients on HOD99. |
| Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Emotional Functioning | At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy | Patient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. |
| Toxicities With Grade >1 | 3 years | Comparison of the toxicities of intermediate risk patients treated with Stanford V chemotherapy low dose tailored-field radiation (current HOD05 protocol) to those patients on HOD99 (NCT00145600). Grading of toxicities for HOD05 and HOD99 used the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0. |
| Prognostic Factors for Treatment Failure: Gender | 3 years follow-up | Event-free survival (EFS) was calculated for the 80 eligible patients. EFS was defined as the interval between on study to relapse, second malignant tumor, or last contact (all alive) whichever came first. For those who had multiple relapses, the first one was counted. Given only 11 events, we examined individually age, gender, histology and stage for its association with EFS using Cox model. P values from Score test were computed for the statistical significance. |
| Prognostic Factors for Treatment Failure: Histology | 3 years follow-up | Event-free survival (EFS) was calculated for the 80 eligible patients. EFS was defined as the interval between on study to relapse, second malignant tumor, or last contact (all alive) whichever came first. For those who had multiple relapses, the first one was counted. Given only 11 events, we examined individually age, gender, histology and stage for its association with EFS using Cox model. P values from Score test were computed for the statistical significance. |
| Prognostic Factors for Treatment Failure: Stage | 5.5 (years) median follow-up with minimum 0.3 to maximum 9.4 years follow-up | Ann Arbor staging classification was used to stage all patients. Stage was examined (I/II versus III) for the association with event-free survival (EFS), defined as the interval between date on study and of relapse/disease progression, second malignancy, death, or last contact, whichever came first. Given only 11 events, the investigators used univariate Cox model with Score test to compute the p value for the statistical significance. Stage \<III showed a better outcome but was not statistically significant. |
| Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Echocardiogram) | 1, 2, 5, and 10 years post therapy | Echocardiograms will be carried out on the patient at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years after therapy. Outcomes will be categorized. |
| Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Electrocardiogram) | 1, 2, 5, and 10 years post therapy | Electrocardiograms (EKGs) will be conducted on the patient at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years after therapy. Results will be categorized as either normal or abnormal, determined by the test outcome. |
| Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Pulmonary Function) | 1, 2, 5, and 10 years post therapy | Patient pulmonary function will undergo assessment at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years after therapy. Results will be categorized as either normal or abnormal, depending on the test results. |
| Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: Thyroid (TSH) | 1, 2, 5, and 10 years post therapy | For patients that received cervical radiation, TSH laboratory testing will be conducted at 1, 2, 5 and 10 years. TSH results will be categorized as Normal, Hypothyroid, Hyperthyroid, or Thyroid Nodule, depending on the test's findings. |
| 3-year Local Failure-free Survival Probability | 3 years | Comparison of the 3-year local failure-free survival probability along with the whole local failure-free survival distributions of intermediate risk patients treated with Stanford V chemotherapy low dose tailored-field radiation to those patients on HOD99. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Participants were enrolled between July 2006 and March 2012.
Pre-assignment details
One participant was determined to be ineligible after enrollment and prior to start of therapy.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Stanford V Chemotherapy Participants receive 12 weeks of Stanford V chemotherapy:
Adriamycin, IV, Day 1 of weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11 Vinblastine, IV, Day 1 of weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 Nitrogen Mustard (or Cyclophosphamide), IV, Day 1 of weeks 1, 5, 9 Vincristine, IV, Day 1 of weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 Bleomycin, IV, Day 1 of weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 Etoposide, IV, Days 1, 2 of weeks 1-10 Prednisone, PO, every other day of weeks 1-12 G-CSF, SC, days 3-13, 16-26, 29-39, 42-52, 55-65, 68-78 (as clinically indicated)
After completion of 12 weeks of Stanford V chemotherapy, participants receive radiotherapy. | 80 |
| Total | 80 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Progressive disease | 3 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Stanford V Chemotherapy |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 15.10 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.15 |
| Participating Site Location Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA | 21 participants |
| Participating Site Location Main Medical Center, Portland, ME | 2 participants |
| Participating Site Location Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA | 1 participants |
| Participating Site Location Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, CA | 1 participants |
| Participating Site Location Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA | 22 participants |
| Participating Site Location St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN | 33 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 46 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 34 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 69 / 80 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 1 / 80 |
Outcome results
3-year Event-Free Survival Probability
The survival probability for the time interval from treatment start to the time of the first failure (disease recurrence, second malignancy or death) within a 3-year time frame.
Time frame: 3 years
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | 3-year Event-Free Survival Probability | 0.887 probability |
3-year Event-free Survival (EFS) Probability
Comparison of thee-year EFS probability along with the whole EFS distributions of intermediate risk patients treated with Stanford V chemotherapy low dose tailored-field radiation to those patients on HOD99.
Time frame: 3 years
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | 3-year Event-free Survival (EFS) Probability | 0.887 probability |
| Week 8 | 3-year Event-free Survival (EFS) Probability | 0.844 probability |
3-year Local Failure-free Survival Probability
Comparison of the 3-year local failure-free survival probability along with the whole local failure-free survival distributions of intermediate risk patients treated with Stanford V chemotherapy low dose tailored-field radiation to those patients on HOD99.
Time frame: 3 years
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | 3-year Local Failure-free Survival Probability | 0.887 probability |
| Week 8 | 3-year Local Failure-free Survival Probability | 0.932 probability |
3-year Overall Survival (OS) Probability
Comparison of the 3-year OS probability along with the whole OS distributions of intermediate risk patients treated with Stanford V chemotherapy low dose tailored-field radiation to those patients on HOD99.
Time frame: 3-years
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | 3-year Overall Survival (OS) Probability | 1.00 probability |
| Week 8 | 3-year Overall Survival (OS) Probability | 0.978 probability |
Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Cognitive Problems
Relationship between quality of life and symptom distress across multiple time points \[completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50.
Time frame: 6 months after the completion of therapy
Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant completed the QoL and symptom distress questions.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Cognitive Problems | -1.46 beta coefficient |
Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Communication
Relationship between quality of life and symptom distress across multiple time points \[completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50.
Time frame: 6 months after the completion of therapy
Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant completed the QoL and symptom distress questions.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Communication | -1.35 beta coefficient |
Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Nausea
Relationship between quality of life and symptom distress across multiple time points \[completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50.
Time frame: 6 months after the completion of therapy
Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant completed the QoL and symptom distress questions.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Nausea | -2.31 beta coefficient |
Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Pain and Hurt
Relationship between quality of life and symptom distress across multiple time points \[completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50.
Time frame: 6 months after the completion of therapy
Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant completed the QoL and symptom distress questions.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Pain and Hurt | -2.52 beta coefficient |
Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Perceived Physical Appearance
Relationship between quality of life and symptom distress across multiple time points \[completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50.
Time frame: 6 months after the completion of therapy
Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant completed the QoL and symptom distress questions.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Perceived Physical Appearance | -1.20 beta coefficient |
Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Procedural Anxiety
Relationship between quality of life and symptom distress across multiple time points \[completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50.
Time frame: 6 months after the completion of therapy
Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant completed the QoL and symptom distress questions.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Procedural Anxiety | -0.87 beta coefficient |
Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Total Score
Relationship between quality of life and symptom distress across multiple time points \[completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50.
Time frame: 6 months after the completion of therapy
Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant completed the QoL and symptom distress questions.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Total Score | -1.41 beta coefficient |
Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Treatment Anxiety
Relationship between quality of life and symptom distress across multiple time points \[completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50.
Time frame: 6 months after the completion of therapy
Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant completed the QoL and symptom distress questions.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Treatment Anxiety | -0.96 beta coefficient |
Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Worry
Relationship between quality of life and symptom distress across multiple time points \[completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50.
Time frame: 6 months after the completion of therapy
Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant completed the QoL and symptom distress questions.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Worry | -1.06 beta coefficient |
Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.4.0: Emotional Functioning
Relationship between quality of life and symptom distress instruments aggregated across multiple time points \[At diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50.
Time frame: 6 months after the completion of therapy
Population: Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant completed the QoL and symptom distress questions.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.4.0: Emotional Functioning | -1.56 beta coefficient |
Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.4.0: Physical Functioning
Relationship between quality of life and symptom distress instruments aggregated across multiple time points \[At diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50.
Time frame: 6 months after the completion of therapy
Population: Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant completed the QoL and symptom distress questions.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.4.0: Physical Functioning | -1.9 beta coefficient |
Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.4.0: Psychosocial Health
Relationship between quality of life and symptom distress instruments aggregated across multiple time points \[At diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50.
Time frame: 6 months after the completion of therapy
Population: Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant completed the QoL and symptom distress questions.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.4.0: Psychosocial Health | -0.92 beta coefficient |
Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.4.0: School Functioning
Relationship between quality of life and symptom distress instruments aggregated across multiple time points \[At diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50.
Time frame: 6 months after the completion of therapy
Population: Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant completed the QoL and symptom distress questions.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.4.0: School Functioning | -1.21 beta coefficient |
Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.4.0: Social Functioning
Relationship between quality of life and symptom distress instruments aggregated across multiple time points \[At diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50.
Time frame: 6 months after the completion of therapy
Population: Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant completed the QoL and symptom distress questions.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.4.0: Social Functioning | -0.79 beta coefficient |
Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.4.0: Total Score
Relationship between quality of life and symptom distress instruments aggregated across multiple time points \[At diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50.
Time frame: 6 months after the completion of therapy
Population: Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant completed the QoL and symptom distress questions.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.4.0: Total Score | -1.46 beta coefficient |
Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Cognitive Problems
Assess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score.
Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy
Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 8 | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Cognitive Problems | -1.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.7 |
| Week 12 | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Cognitive Problems | 0.14 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19 |
| After Radiation | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Cognitive Problems | -8.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19 |
| Off-therapy | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Cognitive Problems | -4.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 20 |
Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Communication
Assess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score.
Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy
Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 8 | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Communication | -0.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.4 |
| Week 12 | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Communication | -3.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.2 |
| After Radiation | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Communication | -7.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.5 |
| Off-therapy | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Communication | -6.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.1 |
Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Nausea
Assess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score.
Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy
Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 8 | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Nausea | -1.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.8 |
| Week 12 | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Nausea | -3.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.9 |
| After Radiation | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Nausea | -3.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.4 |
| Off-therapy | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Nausea | -1.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.2 |
Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Pain and Hurt
Assess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score.
Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy
Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 8 | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Pain and Hurt | -2.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.5 |
| Week 12 | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Pain and Hurt | -9.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.6 |
| After Radiation | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Pain and Hurt | -5.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.4 |
| Off-therapy | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Pain and Hurt | -5.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.8 |
Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Perceived Physical Appearance
Assess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score.
Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy
Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 8 | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Perceived Physical Appearance | -2.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 21 |
| Week 12 | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Perceived Physical Appearance | -9.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.5 |
| After Radiation | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Perceived Physical Appearance | -5.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.7 |
| Off-therapy | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Perceived Physical Appearance | -9.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.5 |
Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Procedural Anxiety
Assess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score.
Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy
Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 8 | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Procedural Anxiety | -0.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.1 |
| Week 12 | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Procedural Anxiety | -9.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 29.9 |
| After Radiation | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Procedural Anxiety | -2.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 32.7 |
| Off-therapy | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Procedural Anxiety | -8.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.7 |
Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Total Score
Assess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score.
Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy
Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 8 | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Total Score | -1.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 13 |
| Week 12 | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Total Score | -5.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.8 |
| After Radiation | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Total Score | -4.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.5 |
| Off-therapy | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Total Score | -5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.8 |
Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Treatment Anxiety
Assess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score.
Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy
Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 8 | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Treatment Anxiety | -6.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.9 |
| Week 12 | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Treatment Anxiety | -8.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.4 |
| After Radiation | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Treatment Anxiety | -7.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.7 |
| Off-therapy | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Treatment Anxiety | -6.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.7 |
Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Worry
Assess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score.
Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy
Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 8 | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Worry | -0.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.7 |
| Week 12 | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Worry | -3.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.5 |
| After Radiation | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Worry | -2.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.4 |
| Off-therapy | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Worry | -0.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.9 |
Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Emotional Functioning
Assess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score.
Time frame: At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy
Population: Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Emotional Functioning | -4.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.8 |
| Week 8 | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Emotional Functioning | -9.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.9 |
| Week 12 | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Emotional Functioning | -8.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.2 |
| After Radiation | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Emotional Functioning | -10.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.3 |
| Off-therapy | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Emotional Functioning | -1.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.8 |
Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Physical Functioning
Assess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score.
Time frame: At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy
Population: Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Physical Functioning | -2.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.4 |
| Week 8 | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Physical Functioning | -2.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.9 |
| Week 12 | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Physical Functioning | -1.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.3 |
| After Radiation | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Physical Functioning | -5.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.8 |
| Off-therapy | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Physical Functioning | -2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.1 |
Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Psychosocial Health
Assess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score.
Time frame: At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy
Population: Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Psychosocial Health | -2.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.4 |
| Week 8 | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Psychosocial Health | -6.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.4 |
| Week 12 | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Psychosocial Health | -6.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.2 |
| After Radiation | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Psychosocial Health | -5.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.2 |
| Off-therapy | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Psychosocial Health | -3.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.2 |
Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: School Functioning
Assess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score.
Time frame: At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy
Population: Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: School Functioning | 1.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 17 |
| Week 8 | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: School Functioning | -5.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.5 |
| Week 12 | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: School Functioning | -4.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 21 |
| After Radiation | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: School Functioning | -3.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.7 |
| Off-therapy | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: School Functioning | -4.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.4 |
Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Social Functioning
Assess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score.
Time frame: At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy
Population: Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Social Functioning | -5.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.5 |
| Week 8 | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Social Functioning | -5.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.3 |
| Week 12 | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Social Functioning | -7.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.7 |
| After Radiation | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Social Functioning | -5.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.6 |
| Off-therapy | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Social Functioning | -3.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.4 |
Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Total Score
Assess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score.
Time frame: At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy
Population: Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Total Score | -2.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.3 |
| Week 8 | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Total Score | -4.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.8 |
| Week 12 | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Total Score | -4.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.7 |
| After Radiation | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Total Score | -5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.7 |
| Off-therapy | Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Total Score | -2.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.8 |
Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Echocardiogram)
Echocardiograms will be carried out on the patient at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years after therapy. Outcomes will be categorized.
Time frame: 1, 2, 5, and 10 years post therapy
Population: At each time point, a participant underwent an Echocardiogram (ECHO). Data was unavailable for patients who did not undergo the Echocardiogram at that time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Echocardiogram) | Normal | 68 Participants |
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Echocardiogram) | Abnormal | 0 Participants |
| Week 8 | Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Echocardiogram) | Abnormal | 1 Participants |
| Week 8 | Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Echocardiogram) | Normal | 57 Participants |
| Week 12 | Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Echocardiogram) | Normal | 36 Participants |
| Week 12 | Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Echocardiogram) | Abnormal | 2 Participants |
| After Radiation | Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Echocardiogram) | Normal | 15 Participants |
| After Radiation | Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Echocardiogram) | Abnormal | 1 Participants |
Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Electrocardiogram)
Electrocardiograms (EKGs) will be conducted on the patient at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years after therapy. Results will be categorized as either normal or abnormal, determined by the test outcome.
Time frame: 1, 2, 5, and 10 years post therapy
Population: At each time point, a participant underwent an Electrocardiogram (EKG). Data was unavailable for patients who did not undergo the Electrocardiogram at that time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Electrocardiogram) | Normal | 51 Participants |
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Electrocardiogram) | Abnormal | 5 Participants |
| Week 8 | Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Electrocardiogram) | Abnormal | 8 Participants |
| Week 8 | Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Electrocardiogram) | Normal | 44 Participants |
| Week 12 | Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Electrocardiogram) | Normal | 24 Participants |
| Week 12 | Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Electrocardiogram) | Abnormal | 4 Participants |
| After Radiation | Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Electrocardiogram) | Normal | 10 Participants |
| After Radiation | Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Electrocardiogram) | Abnormal | 6 Participants |
Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Pulmonary Function)
Patient pulmonary function will undergo assessment at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years after therapy. Results will be categorized as either normal or abnormal, depending on the test results.
Time frame: 1, 2, 5, and 10 years post therapy
Population: At each time point, participants who received mediastinal/lung radiation or bleomycin underwent pulmonary function (PFT) assessment. Data was unavailable for patients who did not undergo the pulmonary function test at that time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Pulmonary Function) | Normal | 46 Participants |
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Pulmonary Function) | Abnormal | 20 Participants |
| Week 8 | Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Pulmonary Function) | Abnormal | 20 Participants |
| Week 8 | Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Pulmonary Function) | Normal | 41 Participants |
| Week 12 | Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Pulmonary Function) | Normal | 25 Participants |
| Week 12 | Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Pulmonary Function) | Abnormal | 11 Participants |
| After Radiation | Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Pulmonary Function) | Normal | 9 Participants |
| After Radiation | Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Pulmonary Function) | Abnormal | 1 Participants |
Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: Thyroid (TSH)
For patients that received cervical radiation, TSH laboratory testing will be conducted at 1, 2, 5 and 10 years. TSH results will be categorized as Normal, Hypothyroid, Hyperthyroid, or Thyroid Nodule, depending on the test's findings.
Time frame: 1, 2, 5, and 10 years post therapy
Population: At each time point, participants who received cervical and upper mediastinal radiation underwent TSH laboratory test. Data was unavailable for patients who did not undergo the TSH test at that time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: Thyroid (TSH) | Hypothyroid | 8 Participants |
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: Thyroid (TSH) | Normal | 60 Participants |
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: Thyroid (TSH) | Thyroid Nodule | 0 Participants |
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: Thyroid (TSH) | Hyperthyroid | 2 Participants |
| Week 8 | Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: Thyroid (TSH) | Normal | 54 Participants |
| Week 8 | Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: Thyroid (TSH) | Hypothyroid | 11 Participants |
| Week 8 | Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: Thyroid (TSH) | Hyperthyroid | 1 Participants |
| Week 8 | Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: Thyroid (TSH) | Thyroid Nodule | 0 Participants |
| Week 12 | Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: Thyroid (TSH) | Normal | 37 Participants |
| Week 12 | Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: Thyroid (TSH) | Hyperthyroid | 1 Participants |
| Week 12 | Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: Thyroid (TSH) | Hypothyroid | 8 Participants |
| Week 12 | Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: Thyroid (TSH) | Thyroid Nodule | 0 Participants |
| After Radiation | Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: Thyroid (TSH) | Hypothyroid | 3 Participants |
| After Radiation | Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: Thyroid (TSH) | Hyperthyroid | 0 Participants |
| After Radiation | Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: Thyroid (TSH) | Thyroid Nodule | 0 Participants |
| After Radiation | Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: Thyroid (TSH) | Normal | 20 Participants |
Disease Failure Rate Within Radiation Fields
Defined as disease that recurs in the initially involved nodal region within the field of irradiation. The disease failure rate within the radiation fields will be estimated with a 95% confidence interval using appropriate methods (e.g., estimate cumulative incidence in the presence of competing risks).
Time frame: 3 years
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Disease Failure Rate Within Radiation Fields | 0.1125 proportion of participants |
Local and Distant Failure for Children Treated With Tailored-field Radiation
The cumulative incidence of local and distant failure will be estimated. Effect of competing risks will be taken into account. Local failure is defined as in-field, and distant failure is defined as out-of-field.
Time frame: from first enrollment date up to 3 years follow-up
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Local and Distant Failure for Children Treated With Tailored-field Radiation | Cumulative incidence of distant failure at 3 years | 0.0375 probability that the event occurs |
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Local and Distant Failure for Children Treated With Tailored-field Radiation | Cumulative incidence of local failure at 3 years | 0.1127 probability that the event occurs |
Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Cognitive Problems
Parent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.
Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy
Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 8 | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Cognitive Problems | 77.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.8 |
| Week 12 | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Cognitive Problems | 79.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.4 |
| After Radiation | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Cognitive Problems | 78.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.8 |
| Off-therapy | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Cognitive Problems | 79.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.4 |
Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Communication
Parent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.
Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy
Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 8 | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Communication | 79.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.9 |
| Week 12 | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Communication | 80.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.9 |
| After Radiation | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Communication | 80.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.6 |
| Off-therapy | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Communication | 84.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.3 |
Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Nausea
Parent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.
Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy
Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 8 | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Nausea | 61.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.4 |
| Week 12 | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Nausea | 57.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 29.2 |
| After Radiation | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Nausea | 72.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.6 |
| Off-therapy | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Nausea | 83.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.6 |
Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Pain and Hurt
Parent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.
Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy
Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 8 | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Pain and Hurt | 61.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.3 |
| Week 12 | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Pain and Hurt | 61.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 30.5 |
| After Radiation | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Pain and Hurt | 73.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.9 |
| Off-therapy | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Pain and Hurt | 82.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.4 |
Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Perceived Physical Appearance
Parent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.
Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy
Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 8 | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Perceived Physical Appearance | 74.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.9 |
| Week 12 | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Perceived Physical Appearance | 72.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.9 |
| After Radiation | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Perceived Physical Appearance | 73.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.2 |
| Off-therapy | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Perceived Physical Appearance | 76.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.4 |
Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Procedural Anxiety
Parent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.
Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy
Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 8 | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Procedural Anxiety | 70.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 32.1 |
| Week 12 | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Procedural Anxiety | 60.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 35 |
| After Radiation | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Procedural Anxiety | 63.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 36.6 |
| Off-therapy | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Procedural Anxiety | 73.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 31.7 |
Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Total Score
Parent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.
Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy
Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 8 | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Total Score | 71.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.7 |
| Week 12 | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Total Score | 69.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19 |
| After Radiation | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Total Score | 74.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.7 |
| Off-therapy | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Total Score | 80.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.4 |
Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Treatment Anxiety
Parent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.
Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy
Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 8 | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Treatment Anxiety | 81.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.8 |
| Week 12 | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Treatment Anxiety | 72.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.4 |
| After Radiation | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Treatment Anxiety | 78.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.8 |
| Off-therapy | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Treatment Anxiety | 81.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.8 |
Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Worry
Parent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.
Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy
Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 8 | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Worry | 70 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.5 |
| Week 12 | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Worry | 69.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.3 |
| After Radiation | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Worry | 71.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.1 |
| Off-therapy | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Worry | 78.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.4 |
Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Emotional Functioning
Parent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100.
Time frame: At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy
Population: Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Emotional Functioning | 67.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.4 |
| Week 8 | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Emotional Functioning | 65.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.4 |
| Week 12 | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Emotional Functioning | 68.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.7 |
| After Radiation | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Emotional Functioning | 73.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.1 |
| Off-therapy | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Emotional Functioning | 82.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.9 |
Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Physical Functioning
Parent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100.
Time frame: At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy
Population: Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Physical Functioning | 79.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.7 |
| Week 8 | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Physical Functioning | 65.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.2 |
| Week 12 | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Physical Functioning | 67.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.2 |
| After Radiation | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Physical Functioning | 73.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.3 |
| Off-therapy | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Physical Functioning | 84.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.6 |
Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Psychosocial Health
Parent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100.
Time frame: At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy
Population: Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Psychosocial Health | 76.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.8 |
| Week 8 | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Psychosocial Health | 71.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.7 |
| Week 12 | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Psychosocial Health | 74.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.9 |
| After Radiation | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Psychosocial Health | 79.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.1 |
| Off-therapy | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Psychosocial Health | 88.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 17 |
Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: School Functioning
Parent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100.
Time frame: At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy
Population: Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: School Functioning | 74.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.6 |
| Week 8 | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: School Functioning | 62.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 25 |
| Week 12 | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: School Functioning | 70.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.7 |
| After Radiation | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: School Functioning | 75.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.8 |
| Off-therapy | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: School Functioning | 78.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.2 |
Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Social Functioning
Parent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100.
Time frame: At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy
Population: Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Social Functioning | 86.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.6 |
| Week 8 | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Social Functioning | 83.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 16 |
| Week 12 | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Social Functioning | 80.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.5 |
| After Radiation | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Social Functioning | 85.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.3 |
| Off-therapy | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Social Functioning | 89.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.8 |
Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Total Score
Parent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100.
Time frame: At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy
Population: Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Total Score | 77.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.7 |
| Week 8 | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Total Score | 69.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.9 |
| Week 12 | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Total Score | 72.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.5 |
| After Radiation | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Total Score | 77.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.3 |
| Off-therapy | Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Total Score | 83.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.4 |
Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Cognitive Problems
Patient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.
Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy
Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 8 | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Cognitive Problems | 79.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.4 |
| Week 12 | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Cognitive Problems | 78.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.4 |
| After Radiation | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Cognitive Problems | 87.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.3 |
| Off-therapy | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Cognitive Problems | 82.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.2 |
Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Communication
Patient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.
Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy
Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 8 | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Communication | 80.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.9 |
| Week 12 | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Communication | 83.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.5 |
| After Radiation | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Communication | 87.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.8 |
| Off-therapy | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Communication | 89.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.3 |
Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Nausea
Patient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.
Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy
Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 8 | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Nausea | 62.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 24 |
| Week 12 | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Nausea | 60.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.5 |
| After Radiation | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Nausea | 76.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.9 |
| Off-therapy | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Nausea | 81.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.1 |
Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Pain and Hurt
Patient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.
Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy
Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 8 | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Pain and Hurt | 63.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.4 |
| Week 12 | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Pain and Hurt | 71.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.6 |
| After Radiation | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Pain and Hurt | 79.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.1 |
| Off-therapy | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Pain and Hurt | 88.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.8 |
Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Perceived Physical Appearance
Patient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.
Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy
Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 8 | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Perceived Physical Appearance | 77.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.1 |
| Week 12 | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Perceived Physical Appearance | 81.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.6 |
| After Radiation | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Perceived Physical Appearance | 81.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.4 |
| Off-therapy | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Perceived Physical Appearance | 84.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.9 |
Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Procedural Anxiety
Patient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.
Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy
Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 8 | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Procedural Anxiety | 71.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 29 |
| Week 12 | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Procedural Anxiety | 70.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 32.6 |
| After Radiation | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Procedural Anxiety | 68.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 37.3 |
| Off-therapy | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Procedural Anxiety | 80.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.9 |
Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Total Score
Patient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.
Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy
Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 8 | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Total Score | 74.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.3 |
| Week 12 | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Total Score | 74.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.8 |
| After Radiation | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Total Score | 81.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.6 |
| Off-therapy | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Total Score | 83.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.2 |
Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Treatment Anxiety
Patient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.
Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy
Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 8 | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Treatment Anxiety | 89.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.5 |
| Week 12 | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Treatment Anxiety | 82 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.5 |
| After Radiation | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Treatment Anxiety | 89.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.6 |
| Off-therapy | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Treatment Anxiety | 87.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.1 |
Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Worry
Patient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.
Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy
Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 8 | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Worry | 71.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.5 |
| Week 12 | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Worry | 72.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.7 |
| After Radiation | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Worry | 74.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.2 |
| Off-therapy | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Worry | 76.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 25 |
Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Emotional Functioning
Patient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100.
Time frame: At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy
Population: Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Emotional Functioning | 72.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 18 |
| Week 8 | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Emotional Functioning | 75.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.3 |
| Week 12 | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Emotional Functioning | 75.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.8 |
| After Radiation | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Emotional Functioning | 84.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.8 |
| Off-therapy | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Emotional Functioning | 81.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.1 |
Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQl v.4.0: Physical Functioning
Patient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100.
Time frame: At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy
Population: Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQl v.4.0: Physical Functioning | 83.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.1 |
| Week 8 | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQl v.4.0: Physical Functioning | 68.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.1 |
| Week 12 | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQl v.4.0: Physical Functioning | 69.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.6 |
| After Radiation | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQl v.4.0: Physical Functioning | 80.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.1 |
| Off-therapy | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQl v.4.0: Physical Functioning | 85.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.6 |
Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Psychosocial Health
Patient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100.
Time frame: At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy
Population: Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Psychosocial Health | 79.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 13 |
| Week 8 | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Psychosocial Health | 77.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.4 |
| Week 12 | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Psychosocial Health | 78.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.8 |
| After Radiation | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Psychosocial Health | 84.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.1 |
| Off-therapy | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Psychosocial Health | 84.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.9 |
Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: School Functioning
Patient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100.
Time frame: At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy
Population: Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: School Functioning | 73.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.8 |
| Week 8 | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: School Functioning | 69.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.8 |
| Week 12 | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: School Functioning | 72.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.2 |
| After Radiation | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: School Functioning | 78.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.6 |
| Off-therapy | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: School Functioning | 81.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.6 |
Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0:Social Functioning
Patient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100.
Time frame: At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy
Population: Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0:Social Functioning | 90.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.1 |
| Week 8 | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0:Social Functioning | 88.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 13 |
| Week 12 | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0:Social Functioning | 88.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.6 |
| After Radiation | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0:Social Functioning | 90.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.5 |
| Off-therapy | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0:Social Functioning | 91.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.6 |
Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Total Score
Patient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100.
Time frame: At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy
Population: Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Total Score | 80.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.7 |
| Week 8 | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Total Score | 74.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.5 |
| Week 12 | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Total Score | 75.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.8 |
| After Radiation | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Total Score | 83.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.6 |
| Off-therapy | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Total Score | 84.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.6 |
Patient Quality of Life (QoL), Symptom Distress Scale
The patient's degree of discomfort from specific treatment-related symptoms across multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50.
Time frame: At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy
Population: Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), Symptom Distress Scale | 17.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.5 |
| Week 8 | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), Symptom Distress Scale | 19.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.6 |
| Week 12 | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), Symptom Distress Scale | 18.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.1 |
| After Radiation | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), Symptom Distress Scale | 15.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.8 |
| Off-therapy | Patient Quality of Life (QoL), Symptom Distress Scale | 14.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.3 |
Prognostic Factors for Treatment Failure: Age
Age was examined for the association with event-free survival (EFS) which was defined as the interval between date on study and date of relapse/disease progression, second malignant tumor, death, or last contact, whichever came first. Given only 11 events, the investigators used univariate Cox model with Score test to compute the p value for the statistical significance.
Time frame: 5.5 (years) median follow-up with minimum 0.3 to maximum 9.4 years follow-up
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Prognostic Factors for Treatment Failure: Age | 11 events |
Prognostic Factors for Treatment Failure: Gender
Event-free survival (EFS) was calculated for the 80 eligible patients. EFS was defined as the interval between on study to relapse, second malignant tumor, or last contact (all alive) whichever came first. For those who had multiple relapses, the first one was counted. Given only 11 events, we examined individually age, gender, histology and stage for its association with EFS using Cox model. P values from Score test were computed for the statistical significance.
Time frame: 3 years follow-up
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Prognostic Factors for Treatment Failure: Gender | Male | 5 events |
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Prognostic Factors for Treatment Failure: Gender | Female | 6 events |
Prognostic Factors for Treatment Failure: Histology
Event-free survival (EFS) was calculated for the 80 eligible patients. EFS was defined as the interval between on study to relapse, second malignant tumor, or last contact (all alive) whichever came first. For those who had multiple relapses, the first one was counted. Given only 11 events, we examined individually age, gender, histology and stage for its association with EFS using Cox model. P values from Score test were computed for the statistical significance.
Time frame: 3 years follow-up
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Prognostic Factors for Treatment Failure: Histology | Classical, Nodular Sclerosing | 10 events |
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Prognostic Factors for Treatment Failure: Histology | Other | 1 events |
Prognostic Factors for Treatment Failure: Stage
Ann Arbor staging classification was used to stage all patients. Stage was examined (I/II versus III) for the association with event-free survival (EFS), defined as the interval between date on study and of relapse/disease progression, second malignancy, death, or last contact, whichever came first. Given only 11 events, the investigators used univariate Cox model with Score test to compute the p value for the statistical significance. Stage \<III showed a better outcome but was not statistically significant.
Time frame: 5.5 (years) median follow-up with minimum 0.3 to maximum 9.4 years follow-up
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Prognostic Factors for Treatment Failure: Stage | Stage <III | 8 events |
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Prognostic Factors for Treatment Failure: Stage | Stage ≥III | 3 events |
Toxicities With Grade >1
Comparison of the toxicities of intermediate risk patients treated with Stanford V chemotherapy low dose tailored-field radiation (current HOD05 protocol) to those patients on HOD99 (NCT00145600). Grading of toxicities for HOD05 and HOD99 used the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0.
Time frame: 3 years
Population: Toxicities reported below for the current study (HOD05) include all reported toxicities from a participant's on-study date through 2/17/2016. Toxicities reported below for the HOD99 study include all those reported from a participant's on-study date through their off-study date.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Hemoglobin | 0 adverse events |
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Constipation | 0 adverse events |
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Alanine transaminase (ALT) | 0 adverse events |
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Aspartate transaminase (AST) | 0 adverse events |
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Allergic reaction/hypersensitivity | 0 adverse events |
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Febrile neutropenia | 0 adverse events |
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Fever (in the absence of neutropenia) | 0 adverse events |
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Glucose | 0 adverse events |
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | GGT (gamma-Glutamyltranspeptidase) | 0 adverse events |
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Hypoxia | 0 adverse events |
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Ileus, GI (functional obstruction of bowel) | 0 adverse events |
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Infection with Grade 3 or 4 neutrophils | 0 adverse events |
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Infection - Other | 0 adverse events |
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Infection with normal ANC or Grade 1-2 neutrophils | 0 adverse events |
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Infection with unknown ANC | 0 adverse events |
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Insomnia | 0 adverse events |
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Leukocytes (total WBC) | 0 adverse events |
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Lymphopenia | 0 adverse events |
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Mucositis/stomatitis (functional/symptomatic) | 0 adverse events |
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Nausea | 0 adverse events |
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Neuropathy: motor | 0 adverse events |
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Neuropathy: sensory | 0 adverse events |
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Neutrophils/granulocytes (ANC/AGC) | 0 adverse events |
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Pain | 0 adverse events |
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Phosphate | 0 adverse events |
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Platelets | 0 adverse events |
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Potassium | 0 adverse events |
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Sodium | 0 adverse events |
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Syndromes - Other | 0 adverse events |
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Thrombosis/embolism (vascular access-related) | 0 adverse events |
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Thrombosis/thrombus/embolism | 0 adverse events |
| Stanford V Chemotherapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Vomiting | 0 adverse events |
| Week 8 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Constipation | 0 adverse events |
| Week 8 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Hemoglobin | 26 adverse events |
| Week 8 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Infection with unknown ANC | 0 adverse events |
| Week 8 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Vomiting | 2 adverse events |
| Week 8 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Febrile neutropenia | 7 adverse events |
| Week 8 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Sodium | 1 adverse events |
| Week 8 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Infection with Grade 3 or 4 neutrophils | 2 adverse events |
| Week 8 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Platelets | 0 adverse events |
| Week 8 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Thrombosis/embolism (vascular access-related) | 2 adverse events |
| Week 8 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Hypoxia | 1 adverse events |
| Week 8 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Neutrophils/granulocytes (ANC/AGC) | 24 adverse events |
| Week 8 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Ileus, GI (functional obstruction of bowel) | 1 adverse events |
| Week 8 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Potassium | 2 adverse events |
| Week 8 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Mucositis/stomatitis (functional/symptomatic) | 0 adverse events |
| Week 8 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Allergic reaction/hypersensitivity | 4 adverse events |
| Week 8 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Insomnia | 1 adverse events |
| Week 8 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Aspartate transaminase (AST) | 1 adverse events |
| Week 8 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Glucose | 0 adverse events |
| Week 8 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Neuropathy: sensory | 1 adverse events |
| Week 8 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Infection with normal ANC or Grade 1-2 neutrophils | 3 adverse events |
| Week 8 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Pain | 5 adverse events |
| Week 8 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Nausea | 1 adverse events |
| Week 8 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Phosphate | 1 adverse events |
| Week 8 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Leukocytes (total WBC) | 41 adverse events |
| Week 8 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Alanine transaminase (ALT) | 1 adverse events |
| Week 8 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | GGT (gamma-Glutamyltranspeptidase) | 1 adverse events |
| Week 8 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Thrombosis/thrombus/embolism | 0 adverse events |
| Week 8 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Fever (in the absence of neutropenia) | 2 adverse events |
| Week 8 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Lymphopenia | 22 adverse events |
| Week 8 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Syndromes - Other | 1 adverse events |
| Week 8 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Infection - Other | 1 adverse events |
| Week 8 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Neuropathy: motor | 0 adverse events |
| Week 12 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Pain | 0 adverse events |
| Week 12 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Leukocytes (total WBC) | 15 adverse events |
| Week 12 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Mucositis/stomatitis (functional/symptomatic) | 0 adverse events |
| Week 12 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Lymphopenia | 7 adverse events |
| Week 12 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Thrombosis/thrombus/embolism | 1 adverse events |
| Week 12 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Aspartate transaminase (AST) | 0 adverse events |
| Week 12 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Glucose | 0 adverse events |
| Week 12 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Alanine transaminase (ALT) | 0 adverse events |
| Week 12 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | GGT (gamma-Glutamyltranspeptidase) | 0 adverse events |
| Week 12 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Syndromes - Other | 0 adverse events |
| Week 12 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Sodium | 0 adverse events |
| Week 12 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Hemoglobin | 6 adverse events |
| Week 12 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Hypoxia | 0 adverse events |
| Week 12 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Potassium | 0 adverse events |
| Week 12 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Vomiting | 0 adverse events |
| Week 12 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Thrombosis/embolism (vascular access-related) | 0 adverse events |
| Week 12 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Ileus, GI (functional obstruction of bowel) | 0 adverse events |
| Week 12 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Constipation | 0 adverse events |
| Week 12 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Platelets | 0 adverse events |
| Week 12 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Infection with Grade 3 or 4 neutrophils | 0 adverse events |
| Week 12 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Phosphate | 0 adverse events |
| Week 12 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Allergic reaction/hypersensitivity | 0 adverse events |
| Week 12 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Infection - Other | 0 adverse events |
| Week 12 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Infection with normal ANC or Grade 1-2 neutrophils | 0 adverse events |
| Week 12 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Fever (in the absence of neutropenia) | 0 adverse events |
| Week 12 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Neutrophils/granulocytes (ANC/AGC) | 32 adverse events |
| Week 12 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Infection with unknown ANC | 0 adverse events |
| Week 12 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Neuropathy: sensory | 0 adverse events |
| Week 12 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Neuropathy: motor | 0 adverse events |
| Week 12 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Insomnia | 0 adverse events |
| Week 12 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Febrile neutropenia | 1 adverse events |
| Week 12 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Nausea | 0 adverse events |
| After Radiation | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Insomnia | 0 adverse events |
| After Radiation | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Sodium | 0 adverse events |
| After Radiation | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Mucositis/stomatitis (functional/symptomatic) | 0 adverse events |
| After Radiation | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Infection - Other | 0 adverse events |
| After Radiation | Toxicities With Grade >1 | GGT (gamma-Glutamyltranspeptidase) | 0 adverse events |
| After Radiation | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Alanine transaminase (ALT) | 0 adverse events |
| After Radiation | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Pain | 0 adverse events |
| After Radiation | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Syndromes - Other | 0 adverse events |
| After Radiation | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Febrile neutropenia | 0 adverse events |
| After Radiation | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Glucose | 0 adverse events |
| After Radiation | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Neuropathy: motor | 0 adverse events |
| After Radiation | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Infection with normal ANC or Grade 1-2 neutrophils | 0 adverse events |
| After Radiation | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Nausea | 0 adverse events |
| After Radiation | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Neutrophils/granulocytes (ANC/AGC) | 0 adverse events |
| After Radiation | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Constipation | 0 adverse events |
| After Radiation | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Thrombosis/thrombus/embolism | 0 adverse events |
| After Radiation | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Aspartate transaminase (AST) | 0 adverse events |
| After Radiation | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Hypoxia | 0 adverse events |
| After Radiation | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Neuropathy: sensory | 0 adverse events |
| After Radiation | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Ileus, GI (functional obstruction of bowel) | 0 adverse events |
| After Radiation | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Lymphopenia | 0 adverse events |
| After Radiation | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Platelets | 0 adverse events |
| After Radiation | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Leukocytes (total WBC) | 0 adverse events |
| After Radiation | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Potassium | 0 adverse events |
| After Radiation | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Thrombosis/embolism (vascular access-related) | 0 adverse events |
| After Radiation | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Vomiting | 0 adverse events |
| After Radiation | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Infection with unknown ANC | 0 adverse events |
| After Radiation | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Infection with Grade 3 or 4 neutrophils | 0 adverse events |
| After Radiation | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Allergic reaction/hypersensitivity | 0 adverse events |
| After Radiation | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Hemoglobin | 0 adverse events |
| After Radiation | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Phosphate | 0 adverse events |
| After Radiation | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Fever (in the absence of neutropenia) | 0 adverse events |
| Off-therapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | GGT (gamma-Glutamyltranspeptidase) | 0 adverse events |
| Off-therapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Febrile neutropenia | 0 adverse events |
| Off-therapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Fever (in the absence of neutropenia) | 0 adverse events |
| Off-therapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Glucose | 0 adverse events |
| Off-therapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Hemoglobin | 0 adverse events |
| Off-therapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Hypoxia | 0 adverse events |
| Off-therapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Ileus, GI (functional obstruction of bowel) | 0 adverse events |
| Off-therapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Infection with Grade 3 or 4 neutrophils | 0 adverse events |
| Off-therapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Thrombosis/embolism (vascular access-related) | 0 adverse events |
| Off-therapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Infection - Other | 0 adverse events |
| Off-therapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Infection with normal ANC or Grade 1-2 neutrophils | 0 adverse events |
| Off-therapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Infection with unknown ANC | 0 adverse events |
| Off-therapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Insomnia | 0 adverse events |
| Off-therapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Leukocytes (total WBC) | 0 adverse events |
| Off-therapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Lymphopenia | 0 adverse events |
| Off-therapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Mucositis/stomatitis (functional/symptomatic) | 0 adverse events |
| Off-therapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Nausea | 0 adverse events |
| Off-therapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Thrombosis/thrombus/embolism | 0 adverse events |
| Off-therapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Neuropathy: motor | 0 adverse events |
| Off-therapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Neuropathy: sensory | 0 adverse events |
| Off-therapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Neutrophils/granulocytes (ANC/AGC) | 0 adverse events |
| Off-therapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Pain | 0 adverse events |
| Off-therapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Phosphate | 0 adverse events |
| Off-therapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Platelets | 0 adverse events |
| Off-therapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Potassium | 0 adverse events |
| Off-therapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Sodium | 0 adverse events |
| Off-therapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Vomiting | 1 adverse events |
| Off-therapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Alanine transaminase (ALT) | 0 adverse events |
| Off-therapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Aspartate transaminase (AST) | 0 adverse events |
| Off-therapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Syndromes - Other | 0 adverse events |
| Off-therapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Allergic reaction/hypersensitivity | 0 adverse events |
| Off-therapy | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Constipation | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 3 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Constipation | 1 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 3 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | GGT (gamma-Glutamyltranspeptidase) | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 3 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Syndromes - Other | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 3 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Vomiting | 4 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 3 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Febrile neutropenia | 5 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 3 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Alanine transaminase (ALT) | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 3 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Glucose | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 3 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Insomnia | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 3 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Thrombosis/embolism (vascular access-related) | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 3 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Thrombosis/thrombus/embolism | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 3 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Lymphopenia | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 3 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Aspartate transaminase (AST) | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 3 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Mucositis/stomatitis (functional/symptomatic) | 1 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 3 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Pain | 1 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 3 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Leukocytes (total WBC) | 19 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 3 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Nausea | 2 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 3 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Infection with unknown ANC | 1 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 3 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Infection - Other | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 3 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Fever (in the absence of neutropenia) | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 3 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Phosphate | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 3 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Neuropathy: sensory | 1 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 3 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Infection with Grade 3 or 4 neutrophils | 2 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 3 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Ileus, GI (functional obstruction of bowel) | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 3 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Allergic reaction/hypersensitivity | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 3 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Platelets | 3 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 3 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Hypoxia | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 3 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Neuropathy: motor | 1 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 3 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Potassium | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 3 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Hemoglobin | 2 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 3 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Infection with normal ANC or Grade 1-2 neutrophils | 1 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 3 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Sodium | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 3 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Neutrophils/granulocytes (ANC/AGC) | 9 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 4 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Thrombosis/embolism (vascular access-related) | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 4 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Hypoxia | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 4 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Syndromes - Other | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 4 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Infection with Grade 3 or 4 neutrophils | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 4 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Neutrophils/granulocytes (ANC/AGC) | 30 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 4 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Glucose | 1 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 4 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Constipation | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 4 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Sodium | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 4 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Alanine transaminase (ALT) | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 4 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Neuropathy: motor | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 4 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Phosphate | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 4 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Allergic reaction/hypersensitivity | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 4 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | GGT (gamma-Glutamyltranspeptidase) | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 4 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Fever (in the absence of neutropenia) | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 4 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Neuropathy: sensory | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 4 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Infection - Other | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 4 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Lymphopenia | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 4 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Ileus, GI (functional obstruction of bowel) | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 4 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Infection with unknown ANC | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 4 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Leukocytes (total WBC) | 5 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 4 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Potassium | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 4 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Infection with normal ANC or Grade 1-2 neutrophils | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 4 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Mucositis/stomatitis (functional/symptomatic) | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 4 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Hemoglobin | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 4 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Platelets | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 4 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Vomiting | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 4 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Pain | 1 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 4 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Insomnia | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 4 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Aspartate transaminase (AST) | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 4 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Febrile neutropenia | 2 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 4 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Nausea | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 4 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Thrombosis/thrombus/embolism | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 5 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Allergic reaction/hypersensitivity | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 5 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Thrombosis/embolism (vascular access-related) | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 5 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Infection with unknown ANC | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 5 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Neuropathy: motor | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 5 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Neuropathy: sensory | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 5 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Infection with normal ANC or Grade 1-2 neutrophils | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 5 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Neutrophils/granulocytes (ANC/AGC) | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 5 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Thrombosis/thrombus/embolism | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 5 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Infection - Other | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 5 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Febrile neutropenia | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 5 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Pain | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 5 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Vomiting | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 5 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Infection with Grade 3 or 4 neutrophils | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 5 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Phosphate | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 5 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Ileus, GI (functional obstruction of bowel) | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 5 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Platelets | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 5 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Hypoxia | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 5 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Hemoglobin | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 5 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Potassium | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 5 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | GGT (gamma-Glutamyltranspeptidase) | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 5 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Aspartate transaminase (AST) | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 5 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Sodium | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 5 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Glucose | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 5 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Alanine transaminase (ALT) | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 5 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Syndromes - Other | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 5 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Fever (in the absence of neutropenia) | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 5 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Constipation | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 5 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Lymphopenia | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 5 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Leukocytes (total WBC) | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 5 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Mucositis/stomatitis (functional/symptomatic) | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 5 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Insomnia | 0 adverse events |
| HOD99 - Grade 5 | Toxicities With Grade >1 | Nausea | 0 adverse events |