Skip to content

Chemotherapy With Low-Dose Radiation for Pediatric Hodgkin Lymphoma

Stanford V Chemotherapy With Low-Dose Tailored-Field Radiation Therapy for Intermediate Risk Pediatric Hodgkin Lymphoma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00352027
Enrollment
81
Registered
2006-07-14
Start date
2006-07-20
Completion date
2022-11-15
Last updated
2023-09-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Keywords

Hodgkin's Disease

Brief summary

The main purpose of this protocol is to estimate the percentage of patients with intermediate risk Hodgkin lymphoma who will survive free of disease (Event-free survival) for three years after treatment with multi-agent chemotherapy (Stanford V) and low-dose, tailored-field radiation therapy. The hypothesis being studied is that this treatment will result in more than 80% of patients being alive and free of disease three years after starting treatment.

Detailed description

Treatment Plan Description: Adriamycin 25 mg/m2 IV Day 1 of weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 Vinblastine 6 mg/m2 IV Day 1 of weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 Nitrogen Mustard 6mg/m2 IV on Day 1 of weeks 1, 5, and 9 Cyclophosphamide 650 mg/m2 IV Day 1 of weeks 1, 5, 9(when Nitrogen Mustard was not available due to national shortage) Vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 IV Day 1 of weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 Bleomycin 5 units/m2 IV Day 1 of weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 Etoposide 60 mg/m2 IV Days 1,2 of weeks 3, 7, 11 Prednisone\* 40 mg/m2/day divided in 3 doses PO Every other day of weeks 1-12 G-CSF (only as needed in case of severe myelo-suppression requiring treatment delay) 5 mcg/kg SC Days 3-13, 16-26, 29-39, 42-52, 55-65, 68-78 (as clinically indicated) \* Prednisone taper is foreseen for the last 2 weeks of therapy. Patients will be treated with 12 weeks of Stanford V chemotherapy in the schedule outlined above. Patients will then receive radiation therapy after completion of 12 weeks of chemotherapy. The radiation dose to individual nodal sites will be based on response after 8 weeks of chemotherapy: 15 Gy for areas achieving a complete response and 25.5 Gy achieving less than a complete response, or patients with bulky mediastinal mass.

Interventions

DRUGVinblastine

Given IV, Day 1 of weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11.

Given IV, Day 1 of weeks 1, 5 and 9. Cyclophosphamide may be substituted if nitrogen mustard is unavailable.

DRUGAdriamycin®

Given IV on Day 1 of weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11.

DRUGCyclophosphamide

May be substituted if nitrogen mustard is unavailable. Given on Day 1 of weeks 1, 5 and 9.

DRUGVincristine

Given IV on Day 1 of weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12.

DRUGBleomycin

Given IV on Day 1 of weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12.

DRUGEtoposide

Given IV on Days 1 and 2 of weeks 1-10.

DRUGPrednisone

Given PO every other day of weeks 1-12.

BIOLOGICALG-CSF

Given subcutaneously days 3-13, 16-26, 29-39, 42-52, 55-65, and 68-78 (as clinically indicated).

PROCEDURERadiotherapy

Participants receive radiotherapy after completion of 12 weeks of Stanford V chemotherapy.

Sponsors

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 21 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient is less than or equal to 21 years of age * Patient has a confirmed diagnosis of previously untreated Hodgkin lymphoma * Has Ann Arbor stage IB, IIIA, or IA/IIA with extranodal extension, multiple nodal involvement (3 or more sites), or bulky mediastinal adenopathy.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with favorable risk features * Patients with unfavorable risk features * Patients who have received prior therapy for Hodgkin lymphoma.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
3-year Event-Free Survival Probability3 yearsThe survival probability for the time interval from treatment start to the time of the first failure (disease recurrence, second malignancy or death) within a 3-year time frame.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Disease Failure Rate Within Radiation Fields3 yearsDefined as disease that recurs in the initially involved nodal region within the field of irradiation. The disease failure rate within the radiation fields will be estimated with a 95% confidence interval using appropriate methods (e.g., estimate cumulative incidence in the presence of competing risks).
Local and Distant Failure for Children Treated With Tailored-field Radiationfrom first enrollment date up to 3 years follow-upThe cumulative incidence of local and distant failure will be estimated. Effect of competing risks will be taken into account. Local failure is defined as in-field, and distant failure is defined as out-of-field.
Prognostic Factors for Treatment Failure: Age5.5 (years) median follow-up with minimum 0.3 to maximum 9.4 years follow-upAge was examined for the association with event-free survival (EFS) which was defined as the interval between date on study and date of relapse/disease progression, second malignant tumor, death, or last contact, whichever came first. Given only 11 events, the investigators used univariate Cox model with Score test to compute the p value for the statistical significance.
Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Total ScoreAt Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapyPatient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100.
Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQl v.4.0: Physical FunctioningAt Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapyPatient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100.
Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Psychosocial HealthAt Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapyPatient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100.
Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0:Social FunctioningAt Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapyPatient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100.
Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: School FunctioningAt Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapyPatient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100.
Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Total ScoreAt completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapyPatient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.
Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Pain and HurtAt completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapyPatient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.
Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: NauseaAt completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapyPatient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.
Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Procedural AnxietyAt completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapyPatient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.
Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Treatment AnxietyAt completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapyPatient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.
Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: WorryAt completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapyPatient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.
Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Cognitive ProblemsAt completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapyPatient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.
Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Perceived Physical AppearanceAt completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapyPatient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.
Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: CommunicationAt completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapyPatient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.
Patient Quality of Life (QoL), Symptom Distress ScaleAt Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapyThe patient's degree of discomfort from specific treatment-related symptoms across multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50.
Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Total ScoreAt Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapyParent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100.
Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Physical FunctioningAt Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapyParent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100.
Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Psychosocial HealthAt Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapyParent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100.
Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Emotional FunctioningAt Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapyParent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100.
Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Social FunctioningAt Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapyParent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100.
Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: School FunctioningAt Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapyParent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100.
Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Total ScoreAt completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapyParent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.
Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Pain and HurtAt completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapyParent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.
Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: NauseaAt completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapyParent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.
Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Procedural AnxietyAt completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapyParent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.
Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Treatment AnxietyAt completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapyParent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.
3-year Overall Survival (OS) Probability3-yearsComparison of the 3-year OS probability along with the whole OS distributions of intermediate risk patients treated with Stanford V chemotherapy low dose tailored-field radiation to those patients on HOD99.
Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: WorryAt completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapyParent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.
Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Cognitive ProblemsAt completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapyParent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.
Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Perceived Physical AppearanceAt completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapyParent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.
Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: CommunicationAt completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapyParent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.
Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Total ScoreAt Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapyAssess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score.
Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Physical FunctioningAt Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapyAssess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score.
Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Psychosocial HealthAt Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapyAssess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score.
Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Emotional FunctioningAt Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapyAssess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score.
Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Social FunctioningAt Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapyAssess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score.
Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: School FunctioningAt Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapyAssess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score.
Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Total ScoreAt completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapyAssess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score.
Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Pain and HurtAt completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapyAssess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score.
Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: NauseaAt completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapyAssess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score.
Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Procedural AnxietyAt completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapyAssess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score.
Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Treatment AnxietyAt completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapyAssess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score.
Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: WorryAt completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapyAssess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score.
Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Cognitive ProblemsAt completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapyAssess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score.
Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Perceived Physical AppearanceAt completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapyAssess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score.
Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: CommunicationAt completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapyAssess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score.
Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.4.0: Total Score6 months after the completion of therapyRelationship between quality of life and symptom distress instruments aggregated across multiple time points \[At diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50.
Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.4.0: Physical Functioning6 months after the completion of therapyRelationship between quality of life and symptom distress instruments aggregated across multiple time points \[At diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50.
Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.4.0: Psychosocial Health6 months after the completion of therapyRelationship between quality of life and symptom distress instruments aggregated across multiple time points \[At diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50.
Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.4.0: Emotional Functioning6 months after the completion of therapyRelationship between quality of life and symptom distress instruments aggregated across multiple time points \[At diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50.
Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.4.0: Social Functioning6 months after the completion of therapyRelationship between quality of life and symptom distress instruments aggregated across multiple time points \[At diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50.
Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Procedural Anxiety6 months after the completion of therapyRelationship between quality of life and symptom distress across multiple time points \[completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50.
Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.4.0: School Functioning6 months after the completion of therapyRelationship between quality of life and symptom distress instruments aggregated across multiple time points \[At diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50.
Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Total Score6 months after the completion of therapyRelationship between quality of life and symptom distress across multiple time points \[completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50.
Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Pain and Hurt6 months after the completion of therapyRelationship between quality of life and symptom distress across multiple time points \[completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50.
Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Nausea6 months after the completion of therapyRelationship between quality of life and symptom distress across multiple time points \[completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50.
Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Treatment Anxiety6 months after the completion of therapyRelationship between quality of life and symptom distress across multiple time points \[completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50.
Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Worry6 months after the completion of therapyRelationship between quality of life and symptom distress across multiple time points \[completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50.
Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Cognitive Problems6 months after the completion of therapyRelationship between quality of life and symptom distress across multiple time points \[completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50.
Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Perceived Physical Appearance6 months after the completion of therapyRelationship between quality of life and symptom distress across multiple time points \[completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50.
Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Communication6 months after the completion of therapyRelationship between quality of life and symptom distress across multiple time points \[completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50.
3-year Event-free Survival (EFS) Probability3 yearsComparison of thee-year EFS probability along with the whole EFS distributions of intermediate risk patients treated with Stanford V chemotherapy low dose tailored-field radiation to those patients on HOD99.
Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Emotional FunctioningAt Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapyPatient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100.
Toxicities With Grade >13 yearsComparison of the toxicities of intermediate risk patients treated with Stanford V chemotherapy low dose tailored-field radiation (current HOD05 protocol) to those patients on HOD99 (NCT00145600). Grading of toxicities for HOD05 and HOD99 used the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0.
Prognostic Factors for Treatment Failure: Gender3 years follow-upEvent-free survival (EFS) was calculated for the 80 eligible patients. EFS was defined as the interval between on study to relapse, second malignant tumor, or last contact (all alive) whichever came first. For those who had multiple relapses, the first one was counted. Given only 11 events, we examined individually age, gender, histology and stage for its association with EFS using Cox model. P values from Score test were computed for the statistical significance.
Prognostic Factors for Treatment Failure: Histology3 years follow-upEvent-free survival (EFS) was calculated for the 80 eligible patients. EFS was defined as the interval between on study to relapse, second malignant tumor, or last contact (all alive) whichever came first. For those who had multiple relapses, the first one was counted. Given only 11 events, we examined individually age, gender, histology and stage for its association with EFS using Cox model. P values from Score test were computed for the statistical significance.
Prognostic Factors for Treatment Failure: Stage5.5 (years) median follow-up with minimum 0.3 to maximum 9.4 years follow-upAnn Arbor staging classification was used to stage all patients. Stage was examined (I/II versus III) for the association with event-free survival (EFS), defined as the interval between date on study and of relapse/disease progression, second malignancy, death, or last contact, whichever came first. Given only 11 events, the investigators used univariate Cox model with Score test to compute the p value for the statistical significance. Stage \<III showed a better outcome but was not statistically significant.
Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Echocardiogram)1, 2, 5, and 10 years post therapyEchocardiograms will be carried out on the patient at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years after therapy. Outcomes will be categorized.
Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Electrocardiogram)1, 2, 5, and 10 years post therapyElectrocardiograms (EKGs) will be conducted on the patient at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years after therapy. Results will be categorized as either normal or abnormal, determined by the test outcome.
Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Pulmonary Function)1, 2, 5, and 10 years post therapyPatient pulmonary function will undergo assessment at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years after therapy. Results will be categorized as either normal or abnormal, depending on the test results.
Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: Thyroid (TSH)1, 2, 5, and 10 years post therapyFor patients that received cervical radiation, TSH laboratory testing will be conducted at 1, 2, 5 and 10 years. TSH results will be categorized as Normal, Hypothyroid, Hyperthyroid, or Thyroid Nodule, depending on the test's findings.
3-year Local Failure-free Survival Probability3 yearsComparison of the 3-year local failure-free survival probability along with the whole local failure-free survival distributions of intermediate risk patients treated with Stanford V chemotherapy low dose tailored-field radiation to those patients on HOD99.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were enrolled between July 2006 and March 2012.

Pre-assignment details

One participant was determined to be ineligible after enrollment and prior to start of therapy.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Stanford V Chemotherapy
Participants receive 12 weeks of Stanford V chemotherapy: Adriamycin, IV, Day 1 of weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11 Vinblastine, IV, Day 1 of weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 Nitrogen Mustard (or Cyclophosphamide), IV, Day 1 of weeks 1, 5, 9 Vincristine, IV, Day 1 of weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 Bleomycin, IV, Day 1 of weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 Etoposide, IV, Days 1, 2 of weeks 1-10 Prednisone, PO, every other day of weeks 1-12 G-CSF, SC, days 3-13, 16-26, 29-39, 42-52, 55-65, 68-78 (as clinically indicated) After completion of 12 weeks of Stanford V chemotherapy, participants receive radiotherapy.
80
Total80

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyProgressive disease3

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicStanford V Chemotherapy
Age, Continuous15.10 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.15
Participating Site Location
Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
21 participants
Participating Site Location
Main Medical Center, Portland, ME
2 participants
Participating Site Location
Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
1 participants
Participating Site Location
Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, CA
1 participants
Participating Site Location
Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA
22 participants
Participating Site Location
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
33 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
46 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
34 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
69 / 80
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 80

Outcome results

Primary

3-year Event-Free Survival Probability

The survival probability for the time interval from treatment start to the time of the first failure (disease recurrence, second malignancy or death) within a 3-year time frame.

Time frame: 3 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Stanford V Chemotherapy3-year Event-Free Survival Probability0.887 probability
Comparison: The association of age with EFS was compared. P values from Score test were computed for the statistical significance.p-value: 0.997Cox Model
Secondary

3-year Event-free Survival (EFS) Probability

Comparison of thee-year EFS probability along with the whole EFS distributions of intermediate risk patients treated with Stanford V chemotherapy low dose tailored-field radiation to those patients on HOD99.

Time frame: 3 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Stanford V Chemotherapy3-year Event-free Survival (EFS) Probability0.887 probability
Week 83-year Event-free Survival (EFS) Probability0.844 probability
p-value: 0.908Log Rank
Secondary

3-year Local Failure-free Survival Probability

Comparison of the 3-year local failure-free survival probability along with the whole local failure-free survival distributions of intermediate risk patients treated with Stanford V chemotherapy low dose tailored-field radiation to those patients on HOD99.

Time frame: 3 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Stanford V Chemotherapy3-year Local Failure-free Survival Probability0.887 probability
Week 83-year Local Failure-free Survival Probability0.932 probability
p-value: 0.411Log Rank
Secondary

3-year Overall Survival (OS) Probability

Comparison of the 3-year OS probability along with the whole OS distributions of intermediate risk patients treated with Stanford V chemotherapy low dose tailored-field radiation to those patients on HOD99.

Time frame: 3-years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Stanford V Chemotherapy3-year Overall Survival (OS) Probability1.00 probability
Week 83-year Overall Survival (OS) Probability0.978 probability
p-value: 0.178Log Rank
Secondary

Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Cognitive Problems

Relationship between quality of life and symptom distress across multiple time points \[completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50.

Time frame: 6 months after the completion of therapy

Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant completed the QoL and symptom distress questions.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Stanford V ChemotherapyAssociation Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Cognitive Problems-1.46 beta coefficient
p-value: <0.001Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE)
Secondary

Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Communication

Relationship between quality of life and symptom distress across multiple time points \[completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50.

Time frame: 6 months after the completion of therapy

Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant completed the QoL and symptom distress questions.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Stanford V ChemotherapyAssociation Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Communication-1.35 beta coefficient
p-value: <0.001Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE)
Secondary

Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Nausea

Relationship between quality of life and symptom distress across multiple time points \[completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50.

Time frame: 6 months after the completion of therapy

Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant completed the QoL and symptom distress questions.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Stanford V ChemotherapyAssociation Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Nausea-2.31 beta coefficient
p-value: <0.001Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE)
Secondary

Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Pain and Hurt

Relationship between quality of life and symptom distress across multiple time points \[completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50.

Time frame: 6 months after the completion of therapy

Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant completed the QoL and symptom distress questions.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Stanford V ChemotherapyAssociation Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Pain and Hurt-2.52 beta coefficient
p-value: <0.001Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE)
Secondary

Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Perceived Physical Appearance

Relationship between quality of life and symptom distress across multiple time points \[completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50.

Time frame: 6 months after the completion of therapy

Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant completed the QoL and symptom distress questions.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Stanford V ChemotherapyAssociation Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Perceived Physical Appearance-1.20 beta coefficient
p-value: <0.001Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE)
Secondary

Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Procedural Anxiety

Relationship between quality of life and symptom distress across multiple time points \[completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50.

Time frame: 6 months after the completion of therapy

Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant completed the QoL and symptom distress questions.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Stanford V ChemotherapyAssociation Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Procedural Anxiety-0.87 beta coefficient
p-value: 0.005Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE)
Secondary

Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Total Score

Relationship between quality of life and symptom distress across multiple time points \[completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50.

Time frame: 6 months after the completion of therapy

Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant completed the QoL and symptom distress questions.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Stanford V ChemotherapyAssociation Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Total Score-1.41 beta coefficient
p-value: <0.001Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE)
Secondary

Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Treatment Anxiety

Relationship between quality of life and symptom distress across multiple time points \[completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50.

Time frame: 6 months after the completion of therapy

Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant completed the QoL and symptom distress questions.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Stanford V ChemotherapyAssociation Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Treatment Anxiety-0.96 beta coefficient
p-value: <0.001Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE)
Secondary

Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Worry

Relationship between quality of life and symptom distress across multiple time points \[completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50.

Time frame: 6 months after the completion of therapy

Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant completed the QoL and symptom distress questions.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Stanford V ChemotherapyAssociation Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.3.0: Worry-1.06 beta coefficient
p-value: <0.001Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE)
Secondary

Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.4.0: Emotional Functioning

Relationship between quality of life and symptom distress instruments aggregated across multiple time points \[At diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50.

Time frame: 6 months after the completion of therapy

Population: Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant completed the QoL and symptom distress questions.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Stanford V ChemotherapyAssociation Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.4.0: Emotional Functioning-1.56 beta coefficient
p-value: <0.001Generallized Estimating Equations (GEE)
Secondary

Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.4.0: Physical Functioning

Relationship between quality of life and symptom distress instruments aggregated across multiple time points \[At diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50.

Time frame: 6 months after the completion of therapy

Population: Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant completed the QoL and symptom distress questions.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Stanford V ChemotherapyAssociation Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.4.0: Physical Functioning-1.9 beta coefficient
p-value: <0.001Generallized Estimating Equations (GEE)
Secondary

Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.4.0: Psychosocial Health

Relationship between quality of life and symptom distress instruments aggregated across multiple time points \[At diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50.

Time frame: 6 months after the completion of therapy

Population: Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant completed the QoL and symptom distress questions.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Stanford V ChemotherapyAssociation Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.4.0: Psychosocial Health-0.92 beta coefficient
p-value: <0.001Generallized Estimating Equations (GEE)
Secondary

Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.4.0: School Functioning

Relationship between quality of life and symptom distress instruments aggregated across multiple time points \[At diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50.

Time frame: 6 months after the completion of therapy

Population: Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant completed the QoL and symptom distress questions.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Stanford V ChemotherapyAssociation Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.4.0: School Functioning-1.21 beta coefficient
p-value: <0.001Generallized Estimating Equations (GEE)
Secondary

Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.4.0: Social Functioning

Relationship between quality of life and symptom distress instruments aggregated across multiple time points \[At diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50.

Time frame: 6 months after the completion of therapy

Population: Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant completed the QoL and symptom distress questions.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Stanford V ChemotherapyAssociation Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.4.0: Social Functioning-0.79 beta coefficient
p-value: <0.001Generallized Estimating Equations (GEE)
Secondary

Association Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.4.0: Total Score

Relationship between quality of life and symptom distress instruments aggregated across multiple time points \[At diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy\]. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the association between symptoms distress and QoL scores. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50.

Time frame: 6 months after the completion of therapy

Population: Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant completed the QoL and symptom distress questions.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Stanford V ChemotherapyAssociation Between Patient-Reported QoL and Symptom Distress, PedsQL v.4.0: Total Score-1.46 beta coefficient
p-value: <0.001Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE)
Secondary

Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Cognitive Problems

Assess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score.

Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy

Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Week 8Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Cognitive Problems-1.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.7
Week 12Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Cognitive Problems0.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19
After RadiationCorrelation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Cognitive Problems-8.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19
Off-therapyCorrelation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Cognitive Problems-4.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20
p-value: 0.933Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.933Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.051Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.0779Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
Secondary

Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Communication

Assess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score.

Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy

Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Week 8Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Communication-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.4
Week 12Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Communication-3.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.2
After RadiationCorrelation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Communication-7.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.5
Off-therapyCorrelation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Communication-6.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.1
p-value: 0.814Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.553Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.173Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.122Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
Secondary

Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Nausea

Assess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score.

Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy

Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Week 8Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Nausea-1.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.8
Week 12Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Nausea-3.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.9
After RadiationCorrelation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Nausea-3.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.4
Off-therapyCorrelation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Nausea-1.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.2
p-value: 0.629Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.629Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.629Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.858Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
Secondary

Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Pain and Hurt

Assess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score.

Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy

Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Week 8Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Pain and Hurt-2.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.5
Week 12Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Pain and Hurt-9.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.6
After RadiationCorrelation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Pain and Hurt-5.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.4
Off-therapyCorrelation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Pain and Hurt-5.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.8
p-value: 0.381Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.006Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.277Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.134Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
Secondary

Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Perceived Physical Appearance

Assess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score.

Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy

Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Week 8Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Perceived Physical Appearance-2.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21
Week 12Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Perceived Physical Appearance-9.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.5
After RadiationCorrelation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Perceived Physical Appearance-5.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.7
Off-therapyCorrelation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Perceived Physical Appearance-9.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.5
p-value: 0.415Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.005Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.245Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.005Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
Secondary

Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Procedural Anxiety

Assess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score.

Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy

Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Week 8Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Procedural Anxiety-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.1
Week 12Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Procedural Anxiety-9.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.9
After RadiationCorrelation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Procedural Anxiety-2.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.7
Off-therapyCorrelation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Procedural Anxiety-8.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.7
p-value: 0.744Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.075Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.512Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.088Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
Secondary

Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Total Score

Assess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score.

Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy

Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Week 8Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Total Score-1.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13
Week 12Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Total Score-5.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.8
After RadiationCorrelation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Total Score-4.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.5
Off-therapyCorrelation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Total Score-5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.8
p-value: 0.162Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.162Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.558Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.039Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
Secondary

Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Treatment Anxiety

Assess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score.

Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy

Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Week 8Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Treatment Anxiety-6.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.9
Week 12Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Treatment Anxiety-8.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.4
After RadiationCorrelation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Treatment Anxiety-7.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.7
Off-therapyCorrelation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Treatment Anxiety-6.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.7
p-value: 0.078Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.041Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.078Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.078Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
Secondary

Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Worry

Assess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score.

Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy

Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Week 8Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Worry-0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.7
Week 12Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Worry-3.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.5
After RadiationCorrelation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Worry-2.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.4
Off-therapyCorrelation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.3.0: Worry-0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.9
p-value: 0.739Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.739Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.739Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.739Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
Secondary

Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Emotional Functioning

Assess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score.

Time frame: At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy

Population: Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Stanford V ChemotherapyCorrelation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Emotional Functioning-4.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.8
Week 8Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Emotional Functioning-9.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.9
Week 12Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Emotional Functioning-8.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.2
After RadiationCorrelation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Emotional Functioning-10.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.3
Off-therapyCorrelation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Emotional Functioning-1.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.8
p-value: 0.071Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: <0.001Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: <0.001Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: <0.001Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.707Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
Secondary

Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Physical Functioning

Assess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score.

Time frame: At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy

Population: Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Stanford V ChemotherapyCorrelation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Physical Functioning-2.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.4
Week 8Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Physical Functioning-2.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.9
Week 12Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Physical Functioning-1.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.3
After RadiationCorrelation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Physical Functioning-5.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.8
Off-therapyCorrelation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Physical Functioning-2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.1
p-value: 0.563Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.563Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.563Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.184Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.563Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
Secondary

Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Psychosocial Health

Assess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score.

Time frame: At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy

Population: Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Stanford V ChemotherapyCorrelation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Psychosocial Health-2.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.4
Week 8Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Psychosocial Health-6.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.4
Week 12Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Psychosocial Health-6.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.2
After RadiationCorrelation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Psychosocial Health-5.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.2
Off-therapyCorrelation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Psychosocial Health-3.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.2
p-value: 0.319Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.01Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.002Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.015Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.588Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
Secondary

Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: School Functioning

Assess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score.

Time frame: At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy

Population: Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Stanford V ChemotherapyCorrelation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: School Functioning1.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17
Week 8Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: School Functioning-5.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.5
Week 12Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: School Functioning-4.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21
After RadiationCorrelation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: School Functioning-3.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.7
Off-therapyCorrelation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: School Functioning-4.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.4
p-value: 0.503Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.372Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.546Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.242Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.372Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
Secondary

Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Social Functioning

Assess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score.

Time frame: At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy

Population: Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Stanford V ChemotherapyCorrelation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Social Functioning-5.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.5
Week 8Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Social Functioning-5.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.3
Week 12Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Social Functioning-7.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.7
After RadiationCorrelation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Social Functioning-5.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.6
Off-therapyCorrelation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Social Functioning-3.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.4
p-value: 0.042Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.025Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.013Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.027Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.243Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
Secondary

Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Total Score

Assess and compare the patient reported and parent proxy quality of life across multiple time points. Reported mean differences were calculated as parent score minus patient score. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100. Reported mean differences were calculated as: parent score - patient score.

Time frame: At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy

Population: Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Stanford V ChemotherapyCorrelation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Total Score-2.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.3
Week 8Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Total Score-4.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.8
Week 12Correlation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Total Score-4.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.7
After RadiationCorrelation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Total Score-5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.7
Off-therapyCorrelation of Agreement Between Patient QoL and Parent Proxy QoL at Multiple Time Points, PedsQL v.4.0: Total Score-2.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.8
p-value: 0.265Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.057Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.079Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.025Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
p-value: 0.68Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
Secondary

Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Echocardiogram)

Echocardiograms will be carried out on the patient at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years after therapy. Outcomes will be categorized.

Time frame: 1, 2, 5, and 10 years post therapy

Population: At each time point, a participant underwent an Echocardiogram (ECHO). Data was unavailable for patients who did not undergo the Echocardiogram at that time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Stanford V ChemotherapyDescribe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Echocardiogram)Normal68 Participants
Stanford V ChemotherapyDescribe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Echocardiogram)Abnormal0 Participants
Week 8Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Echocardiogram)Abnormal1 Participants
Week 8Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Echocardiogram)Normal57 Participants
Week 12Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Echocardiogram)Normal36 Participants
Week 12Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Echocardiogram)Abnormal2 Participants
After RadiationDescribe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Echocardiogram)Normal15 Participants
After RadiationDescribe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Echocardiogram)Abnormal1 Participants
Secondary

Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Electrocardiogram)

Electrocardiograms (EKGs) will be conducted on the patient at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years after therapy. Results will be categorized as either normal or abnormal, determined by the test outcome.

Time frame: 1, 2, 5, and 10 years post therapy

Population: At each time point, a participant underwent an Electrocardiogram (EKG). Data was unavailable for patients who did not undergo the Electrocardiogram at that time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Stanford V ChemotherapyDescribe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Electrocardiogram)Normal51 Participants
Stanford V ChemotherapyDescribe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Electrocardiogram)Abnormal5 Participants
Week 8Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Electrocardiogram)Abnormal8 Participants
Week 8Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Electrocardiogram)Normal44 Participants
Week 12Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Electrocardiogram)Normal24 Participants
Week 12Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Electrocardiogram)Abnormal4 Participants
After RadiationDescribe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Electrocardiogram)Normal10 Participants
After RadiationDescribe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Electrocardiogram)Abnormal6 Participants
Secondary

Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Pulmonary Function)

Patient pulmonary function will undergo assessment at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years after therapy. Results will be categorized as either normal or abnormal, depending on the test results.

Time frame: 1, 2, 5, and 10 years post therapy

Population: At each time point, participants who received mediastinal/lung radiation or bleomycin underwent pulmonary function (PFT) assessment. Data was unavailable for patients who did not undergo the pulmonary function test at that time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Stanford V ChemotherapyDescribe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Pulmonary Function)Normal46 Participants
Stanford V ChemotherapyDescribe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Pulmonary Function)Abnormal20 Participants
Week 8Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Pulmonary Function)Abnormal20 Participants
Week 8Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Pulmonary Function)Normal41 Participants
Week 12Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Pulmonary Function)Normal25 Participants
Week 12Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Pulmonary Function)Abnormal11 Participants
After RadiationDescribe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Pulmonary Function)Normal9 Participants
After RadiationDescribe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: (Pulmonary Function)Abnormal1 Participants
Secondary

Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: Thyroid (TSH)

For patients that received cervical radiation, TSH laboratory testing will be conducted at 1, 2, 5 and 10 years. TSH results will be categorized as Normal, Hypothyroid, Hyperthyroid, or Thyroid Nodule, depending on the test's findings.

Time frame: 1, 2, 5, and 10 years post therapy

Population: At each time point, participants who received cervical and upper mediastinal radiation underwent TSH laboratory test. Data was unavailable for patients who did not undergo the TSH test at that time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Stanford V ChemotherapyDescribe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: Thyroid (TSH)Hypothyroid8 Participants
Stanford V ChemotherapyDescribe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: Thyroid (TSH)Normal60 Participants
Stanford V ChemotherapyDescribe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: Thyroid (TSH)Thyroid Nodule0 Participants
Stanford V ChemotherapyDescribe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: Thyroid (TSH)Hyperthyroid2 Participants
Week 8Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: Thyroid (TSH)Normal54 Participants
Week 8Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: Thyroid (TSH)Hypothyroid11 Participants
Week 8Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: Thyroid (TSH)Hyperthyroid1 Participants
Week 8Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: Thyroid (TSH)Thyroid Nodule0 Participants
Week 12Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: Thyroid (TSH)Normal37 Participants
Week 12Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: Thyroid (TSH)Hyperthyroid1 Participants
Week 12Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: Thyroid (TSH)Hypothyroid8 Participants
Week 12Describe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: Thyroid (TSH)Thyroid Nodule0 Participants
After RadiationDescribe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: Thyroid (TSH)Hypothyroid3 Participants
After RadiationDescribe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: Thyroid (TSH)Hyperthyroid0 Participants
After RadiationDescribe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: Thyroid (TSH)Thyroid Nodule0 Participants
After RadiationDescribe Toxicities, Particularly the Frequency and Severity of Late Effects of Therapy: Thyroid (TSH)Normal20 Participants
Secondary

Disease Failure Rate Within Radiation Fields

Defined as disease that recurs in the initially involved nodal region within the field of irradiation. The disease failure rate within the radiation fields will be estimated with a 95% confidence interval using appropriate methods (e.g., estimate cumulative incidence in the presence of competing risks).

Time frame: 3 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Stanford V ChemotherapyDisease Failure Rate Within Radiation Fields0.1125 proportion of participants
Secondary

Local and Distant Failure for Children Treated With Tailored-field Radiation

The cumulative incidence of local and distant failure will be estimated. Effect of competing risks will be taken into account. Local failure is defined as in-field, and distant failure is defined as out-of-field.

Time frame: from first enrollment date up to 3 years follow-up

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Stanford V ChemotherapyLocal and Distant Failure for Children Treated With Tailored-field RadiationCumulative incidence of distant failure at 3 years0.0375 probability that the event occurs
Stanford V ChemotherapyLocal and Distant Failure for Children Treated With Tailored-field RadiationCumulative incidence of local failure at 3 years0.1127 probability that the event occurs
Secondary

Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Cognitive Problems

Parent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.

Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy

Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Week 8Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Cognitive Problems77.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.8
Week 12Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Cognitive Problems79.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.4
After RadiationParent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Cognitive Problems78.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.8
Off-therapyParent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Cognitive Problems79.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.4
Secondary

Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Communication

Parent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.

Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy

Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Week 8Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Communication79.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.9
Week 12Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Communication80.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.9
After RadiationParent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Communication80.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.6
Off-therapyParent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Communication84.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.3
Secondary

Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Nausea

Parent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.

Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy

Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Week 8Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Nausea61.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.4
Week 12Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Nausea57.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.2
After RadiationParent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Nausea72.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.6
Off-therapyParent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Nausea83.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.6
Secondary

Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Pain and Hurt

Parent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.

Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy

Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Week 8Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Pain and Hurt61.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.3
Week 12Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Pain and Hurt61.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.5
After RadiationParent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Pain and Hurt73.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.9
Off-therapyParent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Pain and Hurt82.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.4
Secondary

Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Perceived Physical Appearance

Parent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.

Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy

Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Week 8Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Perceived Physical Appearance74.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.9
Week 12Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Perceived Physical Appearance72.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.9
After RadiationParent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Perceived Physical Appearance73.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.2
Off-therapyParent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Perceived Physical Appearance76.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.4
Secondary

Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Procedural Anxiety

Parent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.

Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy

Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Week 8Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Procedural Anxiety70.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.1
Week 12Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Procedural Anxiety60.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 35
After RadiationParent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Procedural Anxiety63.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 36.6
Off-therapyParent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Procedural Anxiety73.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.7
Secondary

Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Total Score

Parent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.

Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy

Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Week 8Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Total Score71.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.7
Week 12Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Total Score69.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19
After RadiationParent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Total Score74.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.7
Off-therapyParent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Total Score80.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.4
Secondary

Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Treatment Anxiety

Parent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.

Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy

Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Week 8Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Treatment Anxiety81.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.8
Week 12Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Treatment Anxiety72.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.4
After RadiationParent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Treatment Anxiety78.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.8
Off-therapyParent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Treatment Anxiety81.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.8
Secondary

Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Worry

Parent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.

Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy

Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Week 8Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Worry70 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.5
Week 12Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Worry69.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.3
After RadiationParent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Worry71.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.1
Off-therapyParent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Worry78.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.4
Secondary

Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Emotional Functioning

Parent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100.

Time frame: At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy

Population: Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Stanford V ChemotherapyParent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Emotional Functioning67.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.4
Week 8Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Emotional Functioning65.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.4
Week 12Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Emotional Functioning68.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.7
After RadiationParent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Emotional Functioning73.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.1
Off-therapyParent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Emotional Functioning82.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.9
Secondary

Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Physical Functioning

Parent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100.

Time frame: At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy

Population: Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Stanford V ChemotherapyParent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Physical Functioning79.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.7
Week 8Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Physical Functioning65.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.2
Week 12Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Physical Functioning67.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.2
After RadiationParent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Physical Functioning73.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.3
Off-therapyParent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Physical Functioning84.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.6
Secondary

Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Psychosocial Health

Parent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100.

Time frame: At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy

Population: Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Stanford V ChemotherapyParent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Psychosocial Health76.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.8
Week 8Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Psychosocial Health71.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.7
Week 12Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Psychosocial Health74.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.9
After RadiationParent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Psychosocial Health79.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.1
Off-therapyParent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Psychosocial Health88.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17
Secondary

Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: School Functioning

Parent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100.

Time frame: At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy

Population: Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Stanford V ChemotherapyParent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: School Functioning74.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.6
Week 8Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: School Functioning62.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25
Week 12Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: School Functioning70.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.7
After RadiationParent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: School Functioning75.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.8
Off-therapyParent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: School Functioning78.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.2
Secondary

Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Social Functioning

Parent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100.

Time frame: At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy

Population: Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Stanford V ChemotherapyParent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Social Functioning86.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.6
Week 8Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Social Functioning83.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16
Week 12Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Social Functioning80.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.5
After RadiationParent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Social Functioning85.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.3
Off-therapyParent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Social Functioning89.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.8
Secondary

Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Total Score

Parent's assessment of child's functioning over multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100.

Time frame: At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy

Population: Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Stanford V ChemotherapyParent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Total Score77.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.7
Week 8Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Total Score69.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.9
Week 12Parent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Total Score72.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.5
After RadiationParent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Total Score77.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.3
Off-therapyParent Proxy Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Total Score83.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.4
Secondary

Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Cognitive Problems

Patient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.

Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy

Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Week 8Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Cognitive Problems79.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.4
Week 12Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Cognitive Problems78.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.4
After RadiationPatient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Cognitive Problems87.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.3
Off-therapyPatient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Cognitive Problems82.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.2
Secondary

Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Communication

Patient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.

Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy

Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Week 8Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Communication80.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.9
Week 12Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Communication83.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.5
After RadiationPatient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Communication87.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.8
Off-therapyPatient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Communication89.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.3
Secondary

Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Nausea

Patient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.

Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy

Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Week 8Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Nausea62.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24
Week 12Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Nausea60.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.5
After RadiationPatient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Nausea76.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.9
Off-therapyPatient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Nausea81.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.1
Secondary

Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Pain and Hurt

Patient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.

Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy

Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Week 8Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Pain and Hurt63.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.4
Week 12Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Pain and Hurt71.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.6
After RadiationPatient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Pain and Hurt79.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.1
Off-therapyPatient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Pain and Hurt88.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.8
Secondary

Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Perceived Physical Appearance

Patient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.

Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy

Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Week 8Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Perceived Physical Appearance77.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.1
Week 12Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Perceived Physical Appearance81.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.6
After RadiationPatient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Perceived Physical Appearance81.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.4
Off-therapyPatient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Perceived Physical Appearance84.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.9
Secondary

Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Procedural Anxiety

Patient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.

Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy

Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Week 8Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Procedural Anxiety71.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29
Week 12Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Procedural Anxiety70.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.6
After RadiationPatient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Procedural Anxiety68.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 37.3
Off-therapyPatient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Procedural Anxiety80.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.9
Secondary

Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Total Score

Patient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.

Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy

Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Week 8Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Total Score74.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.3
Week 12Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Total Score74.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.8
After RadiationPatient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Total Score81.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.6
Off-therapyPatient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Total Score83.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.2
Secondary

Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Treatment Anxiety

Patient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.

Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy

Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Week 8Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Treatment Anxiety89.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.5
Week 12Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Treatment Anxiety82 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.5
After RadiationPatient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Treatment Anxiety89.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.6
Off-therapyPatient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Treatment Anxiety87.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.1
Secondary

Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Worry

Patient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.3.0, higher scores indicate lower problems with a range of 0-100.

Time frame: At completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy

Population: Pre-therapy data for PedsQL v.3.0 (symptoms) was not collected, because participants had not started chemotherapy. Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Week 8Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Worry71.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.5
Week 12Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Worry72.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.7
After RadiationPatient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Worry74.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.2
Off-therapyPatient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.3.0: Worry76.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25
Secondary

Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Emotional Functioning

Patient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100.

Time frame: At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy

Population: Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Stanford V ChemotherapyPatient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Emotional Functioning72.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18
Week 8Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Emotional Functioning75.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.3
Week 12Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Emotional Functioning75.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.8
After RadiationPatient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Emotional Functioning84.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.8
Off-therapyPatient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Emotional Functioning81.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.1
Secondary

Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQl v.4.0: Physical Functioning

Patient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100.

Time frame: At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy

Population: Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Stanford V ChemotherapyPatient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQl v.4.0: Physical Functioning83.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.1
Week 8Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQl v.4.0: Physical Functioning68.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.1
Week 12Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQl v.4.0: Physical Functioning69.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.6
After RadiationPatient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQl v.4.0: Physical Functioning80.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.1
Off-therapyPatient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQl v.4.0: Physical Functioning85.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.6
Secondary

Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Psychosocial Health

Patient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100.

Time frame: At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy

Population: Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Stanford V ChemotherapyPatient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Psychosocial Health79.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13
Week 8Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Psychosocial Health77.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.4
Week 12Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Psychosocial Health78.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.8
After RadiationPatient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Psychosocial Health84.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.1
Off-therapyPatient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Psychosocial Health84.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.9
Secondary

Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: School Functioning

Patient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100.

Time frame: At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy

Population: Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Stanford V ChemotherapyPatient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: School Functioning73.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.8
Week 8Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: School Functioning69.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.8
Week 12Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: School Functioning72.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.2
After RadiationPatient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: School Functioning78.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.6
Off-therapyPatient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: School Functioning81.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.6
Secondary

Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0:Social Functioning

Patient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100.

Time frame: At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy

Population: Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Stanford V ChemotherapyPatient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0:Social Functioning90.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.1
Week 8Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0:Social Functioning88.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13
Week 12Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0:Social Functioning88.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.6
After RadiationPatient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0:Social Functioning90.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.5
Off-therapyPatient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0:Social Functioning91.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.6
Secondary

Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Total Score

Patient QOL will be measured at multiple time points to assess the patient's functioning. Instrument interpretation: PedsQL v.4.0, higher scores indicate better HRQOL with a range of 0-100.

Time frame: At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy

Population: Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Stanford V ChemotherapyPatient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Total Score80.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.7
Week 8Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Total Score74.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.5
Week 12Patient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Total Score75.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.8
After RadiationPatient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Total Score83.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.6
Off-therapyPatient Quality of Life (QoL), PedsQL v.4.0: Total Score84.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.6
Secondary

Patient Quality of Life (QoL), Symptom Distress Scale

The patient's degree of discomfort from specific treatment-related symptoms across multiple time points. Instrument interpretation: SDS, higher scores indicate higher overall symptom distress with a range of 10-50.

Time frame: At Diagnosis (T1), completion of 2 cycles of chemotherapy (T2), completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy (T3), completion of radiation (T4), and 3-6 months (T5) after the completion of therapy

Population: Each institution made the decision whether to complete the QoL objective. For each time point, a participant and parent proxy completed the QoL questions. Adult participants of majority age did not have a parent proxy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Stanford V ChemotherapyPatient Quality of Life (QoL), Symptom Distress Scale17.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.5
Week 8Patient Quality of Life (QoL), Symptom Distress Scale19.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.6
Week 12Patient Quality of Life (QoL), Symptom Distress Scale18.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.1
After RadiationPatient Quality of Life (QoL), Symptom Distress Scale15.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.8
Off-therapyPatient Quality of Life (QoL), Symptom Distress Scale14.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.3
Secondary

Prognostic Factors for Treatment Failure: Age

Age was examined for the association with event-free survival (EFS) which was defined as the interval between date on study and date of relapse/disease progression, second malignant tumor, death, or last contact, whichever came first. Given only 11 events, the investigators used univariate Cox model with Score test to compute the p value for the statistical significance.

Time frame: 5.5 (years) median follow-up with minimum 0.3 to maximum 9.4 years follow-up

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Stanford V ChemotherapyPrognostic Factors for Treatment Failure: Age11 events
p-value: 0.997Cox Model
Secondary

Prognostic Factors for Treatment Failure: Gender

Event-free survival (EFS) was calculated for the 80 eligible patients. EFS was defined as the interval between on study to relapse, second malignant tumor, or last contact (all alive) whichever came first. For those who had multiple relapses, the first one was counted. Given only 11 events, we examined individually age, gender, histology and stage for its association with EFS using Cox model. P values from Score test were computed for the statistical significance.

Time frame: 3 years follow-up

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Stanford V ChemotherapyPrognostic Factors for Treatment Failure: GenderMale5 events
Stanford V ChemotherapyPrognostic Factors for Treatment Failure: GenderFemale6 events
p-value: 0.4318Cox Model
Secondary

Prognostic Factors for Treatment Failure: Histology

Event-free survival (EFS) was calculated for the 80 eligible patients. EFS was defined as the interval between on study to relapse, second malignant tumor, or last contact (all alive) whichever came first. For those who had multiple relapses, the first one was counted. Given only 11 events, we examined individually age, gender, histology and stage for its association with EFS using Cox model. P values from Score test were computed for the statistical significance.

Time frame: 3 years follow-up

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Stanford V ChemotherapyPrognostic Factors for Treatment Failure: HistologyClassical, Nodular Sclerosing10 events
Stanford V ChemotherapyPrognostic Factors for Treatment Failure: HistologyOther1 events
p-value: 0.2199Cox Model
Secondary

Prognostic Factors for Treatment Failure: Stage

Ann Arbor staging classification was used to stage all patients. Stage was examined (I/II versus III) for the association with event-free survival (EFS), defined as the interval between date on study and of relapse/disease progression, second malignancy, death, or last contact, whichever came first. Given only 11 events, the investigators used univariate Cox model with Score test to compute the p value for the statistical significance. Stage \<III showed a better outcome but was not statistically significant.

Time frame: 5.5 (years) median follow-up with minimum 0.3 to maximum 9.4 years follow-up

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Stanford V ChemotherapyPrognostic Factors for Treatment Failure: StageStage <III8 events
Stanford V ChemotherapyPrognostic Factors for Treatment Failure: StageStage ≥III3 events
p-value: 0.8946Cox Model
Secondary

Toxicities With Grade >1

Comparison of the toxicities of intermediate risk patients treated with Stanford V chemotherapy low dose tailored-field radiation (current HOD05 protocol) to those patients on HOD99 (NCT00145600). Grading of toxicities for HOD05 and HOD99 used the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0.

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Toxicities reported below for the current study (HOD05) include all reported toxicities from a participant's on-study date through 2/17/2016. Toxicities reported below for the HOD99 study include all those reported from a participant's on-study date through their off-study date.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Stanford V ChemotherapyToxicities With Grade >1Hemoglobin0 adverse events
Stanford V ChemotherapyToxicities With Grade >1Constipation0 adverse events
Stanford V ChemotherapyToxicities With Grade >1Alanine transaminase (ALT)0 adverse events
Stanford V ChemotherapyToxicities With Grade >1Aspartate transaminase (AST)0 adverse events
Stanford V ChemotherapyToxicities With Grade >1Allergic reaction/hypersensitivity0 adverse events
Stanford V ChemotherapyToxicities With Grade >1Febrile neutropenia0 adverse events
Stanford V ChemotherapyToxicities With Grade >1Fever (in the absence of neutropenia)0 adverse events
Stanford V ChemotherapyToxicities With Grade >1Glucose0 adverse events
Stanford V ChemotherapyToxicities With Grade >1GGT (gamma-Glutamyltranspeptidase)0 adverse events
Stanford V ChemotherapyToxicities With Grade >1Hypoxia0 adverse events
Stanford V ChemotherapyToxicities With Grade >1Ileus, GI (functional obstruction of bowel)0 adverse events
Stanford V ChemotherapyToxicities With Grade >1Infection with Grade 3 or 4 neutrophils0 adverse events
Stanford V ChemotherapyToxicities With Grade >1Infection - Other0 adverse events
Stanford V ChemotherapyToxicities With Grade >1Infection with normal ANC or Grade 1-2 neutrophils0 adverse events
Stanford V ChemotherapyToxicities With Grade >1Infection with unknown ANC0 adverse events
Stanford V ChemotherapyToxicities With Grade >1Insomnia0 adverse events
Stanford V ChemotherapyToxicities With Grade >1Leukocytes (total WBC)0 adverse events
Stanford V ChemotherapyToxicities With Grade >1Lymphopenia0 adverse events
Stanford V ChemotherapyToxicities With Grade >1Mucositis/stomatitis (functional/symptomatic)0 adverse events
Stanford V ChemotherapyToxicities With Grade >1Nausea0 adverse events
Stanford V ChemotherapyToxicities With Grade >1Neuropathy: motor0 adverse events
Stanford V ChemotherapyToxicities With Grade >1Neuropathy: sensory0 adverse events
Stanford V ChemotherapyToxicities With Grade >1Neutrophils/granulocytes (ANC/AGC)0 adverse events
Stanford V ChemotherapyToxicities With Grade >1Pain0 adverse events
Stanford V ChemotherapyToxicities With Grade >1Phosphate0 adverse events
Stanford V ChemotherapyToxicities With Grade >1Platelets0 adverse events
Stanford V ChemotherapyToxicities With Grade >1Potassium0 adverse events
Stanford V ChemotherapyToxicities With Grade >1Sodium0 adverse events
Stanford V ChemotherapyToxicities With Grade >1Syndromes - Other0 adverse events
Stanford V ChemotherapyToxicities With Grade >1Thrombosis/embolism (vascular access-related)0 adverse events
Stanford V ChemotherapyToxicities With Grade >1Thrombosis/thrombus/embolism0 adverse events
Stanford V ChemotherapyToxicities With Grade >1Vomiting0 adverse events
Week 8Toxicities With Grade >1Constipation0 adverse events
Week 8Toxicities With Grade >1Hemoglobin26 adverse events
Week 8Toxicities With Grade >1Infection with unknown ANC0 adverse events
Week 8Toxicities With Grade >1Vomiting2 adverse events
Week 8Toxicities With Grade >1Febrile neutropenia7 adverse events
Week 8Toxicities With Grade >1Sodium1 adverse events
Week 8Toxicities With Grade >1Infection with Grade 3 or 4 neutrophils2 adverse events
Week 8Toxicities With Grade >1Platelets0 adverse events
Week 8Toxicities With Grade >1Thrombosis/embolism (vascular access-related)2 adverse events
Week 8Toxicities With Grade >1Hypoxia1 adverse events
Week 8Toxicities With Grade >1Neutrophils/granulocytes (ANC/AGC)24 adverse events
Week 8Toxicities With Grade >1Ileus, GI (functional obstruction of bowel)1 adverse events
Week 8Toxicities With Grade >1Potassium2 adverse events
Week 8Toxicities With Grade >1Mucositis/stomatitis (functional/symptomatic)0 adverse events
Week 8Toxicities With Grade >1Allergic reaction/hypersensitivity4 adverse events
Week 8Toxicities With Grade >1Insomnia1 adverse events
Week 8Toxicities With Grade >1Aspartate transaminase (AST)1 adverse events
Week 8Toxicities With Grade >1Glucose0 adverse events
Week 8Toxicities With Grade >1Neuropathy: sensory1 adverse events
Week 8Toxicities With Grade >1Infection with normal ANC or Grade 1-2 neutrophils3 adverse events
Week 8Toxicities With Grade >1Pain5 adverse events
Week 8Toxicities With Grade >1Nausea1 adverse events
Week 8Toxicities With Grade >1Phosphate1 adverse events
Week 8Toxicities With Grade >1Leukocytes (total WBC)41 adverse events
Week 8Toxicities With Grade >1Alanine transaminase (ALT)1 adverse events
Week 8Toxicities With Grade >1GGT (gamma-Glutamyltranspeptidase)1 adverse events
Week 8Toxicities With Grade >1Thrombosis/thrombus/embolism0 adverse events
Week 8Toxicities With Grade >1Fever (in the absence of neutropenia)2 adverse events
Week 8Toxicities With Grade >1Lymphopenia22 adverse events
Week 8Toxicities With Grade >1Syndromes - Other1 adverse events
Week 8Toxicities With Grade >1Infection - Other1 adverse events
Week 8Toxicities With Grade >1Neuropathy: motor0 adverse events
Week 12Toxicities With Grade >1Pain0 adverse events
Week 12Toxicities With Grade >1Leukocytes (total WBC)15 adverse events
Week 12Toxicities With Grade >1Mucositis/stomatitis (functional/symptomatic)0 adverse events
Week 12Toxicities With Grade >1Lymphopenia7 adverse events
Week 12Toxicities With Grade >1Thrombosis/thrombus/embolism1 adverse events
Week 12Toxicities With Grade >1Aspartate transaminase (AST)0 adverse events
Week 12Toxicities With Grade >1Glucose0 adverse events
Week 12Toxicities With Grade >1Alanine transaminase (ALT)0 adverse events
Week 12Toxicities With Grade >1GGT (gamma-Glutamyltranspeptidase)0 adverse events
Week 12Toxicities With Grade >1Syndromes - Other0 adverse events
Week 12Toxicities With Grade >1Sodium0 adverse events
Week 12Toxicities With Grade >1Hemoglobin6 adverse events
Week 12Toxicities With Grade >1Hypoxia0 adverse events
Week 12Toxicities With Grade >1Potassium0 adverse events
Week 12Toxicities With Grade >1Vomiting0 adverse events
Week 12Toxicities With Grade >1Thrombosis/embolism (vascular access-related)0 adverse events
Week 12Toxicities With Grade >1Ileus, GI (functional obstruction of bowel)0 adverse events
Week 12Toxicities With Grade >1Constipation0 adverse events
Week 12Toxicities With Grade >1Platelets0 adverse events
Week 12Toxicities With Grade >1Infection with Grade 3 or 4 neutrophils0 adverse events
Week 12Toxicities With Grade >1Phosphate0 adverse events
Week 12Toxicities With Grade >1Allergic reaction/hypersensitivity0 adverse events
Week 12Toxicities With Grade >1Infection - Other0 adverse events
Week 12Toxicities With Grade >1Infection with normal ANC or Grade 1-2 neutrophils0 adverse events
Week 12Toxicities With Grade >1Fever (in the absence of neutropenia)0 adverse events
Week 12Toxicities With Grade >1Neutrophils/granulocytes (ANC/AGC)32 adverse events
Week 12Toxicities With Grade >1Infection with unknown ANC0 adverse events
Week 12Toxicities With Grade >1Neuropathy: sensory0 adverse events
Week 12Toxicities With Grade >1Neuropathy: motor0 adverse events
Week 12Toxicities With Grade >1Insomnia0 adverse events
Week 12Toxicities With Grade >1Febrile neutropenia1 adverse events
Week 12Toxicities With Grade >1Nausea0 adverse events
After RadiationToxicities With Grade >1Insomnia0 adverse events
After RadiationToxicities With Grade >1Sodium0 adverse events
After RadiationToxicities With Grade >1Mucositis/stomatitis (functional/symptomatic)0 adverse events
After RadiationToxicities With Grade >1Infection - Other0 adverse events
After RadiationToxicities With Grade >1GGT (gamma-Glutamyltranspeptidase)0 adverse events
After RadiationToxicities With Grade >1Alanine transaminase (ALT)0 adverse events
After RadiationToxicities With Grade >1Pain0 adverse events
After RadiationToxicities With Grade >1Syndromes - Other0 adverse events
After RadiationToxicities With Grade >1Febrile neutropenia0 adverse events
After RadiationToxicities With Grade >1Glucose0 adverse events
After RadiationToxicities With Grade >1Neuropathy: motor0 adverse events
After RadiationToxicities With Grade >1Infection with normal ANC or Grade 1-2 neutrophils0 adverse events
After RadiationToxicities With Grade >1Nausea0 adverse events
After RadiationToxicities With Grade >1Neutrophils/granulocytes (ANC/AGC)0 adverse events
After RadiationToxicities With Grade >1Constipation0 adverse events
After RadiationToxicities With Grade >1Thrombosis/thrombus/embolism0 adverse events
After RadiationToxicities With Grade >1Aspartate transaminase (AST)0 adverse events
After RadiationToxicities With Grade >1Hypoxia0 adverse events
After RadiationToxicities With Grade >1Neuropathy: sensory0 adverse events
After RadiationToxicities With Grade >1Ileus, GI (functional obstruction of bowel)0 adverse events
After RadiationToxicities With Grade >1Lymphopenia0 adverse events
After RadiationToxicities With Grade >1Platelets0 adverse events
After RadiationToxicities With Grade >1Leukocytes (total WBC)0 adverse events
After RadiationToxicities With Grade >1Potassium0 adverse events
After RadiationToxicities With Grade >1Thrombosis/embolism (vascular access-related)0 adverse events
After RadiationToxicities With Grade >1Vomiting0 adverse events
After RadiationToxicities With Grade >1Infection with unknown ANC0 adverse events
After RadiationToxicities With Grade >1Infection with Grade 3 or 4 neutrophils0 adverse events
After RadiationToxicities With Grade >1Allergic reaction/hypersensitivity0 adverse events
After RadiationToxicities With Grade >1Hemoglobin0 adverse events
After RadiationToxicities With Grade >1Phosphate0 adverse events
After RadiationToxicities With Grade >1Fever (in the absence of neutropenia)0 adverse events
Off-therapyToxicities With Grade >1GGT (gamma-Glutamyltranspeptidase)0 adverse events
Off-therapyToxicities With Grade >1Febrile neutropenia0 adverse events
Off-therapyToxicities With Grade >1Fever (in the absence of neutropenia)0 adverse events
Off-therapyToxicities With Grade >1Glucose0 adverse events
Off-therapyToxicities With Grade >1Hemoglobin0 adverse events
Off-therapyToxicities With Grade >1Hypoxia0 adverse events
Off-therapyToxicities With Grade >1Ileus, GI (functional obstruction of bowel)0 adverse events
Off-therapyToxicities With Grade >1Infection with Grade 3 or 4 neutrophils0 adverse events
Off-therapyToxicities With Grade >1Thrombosis/embolism (vascular access-related)0 adverse events
Off-therapyToxicities With Grade >1Infection - Other0 adverse events
Off-therapyToxicities With Grade >1Infection with normal ANC or Grade 1-2 neutrophils0 adverse events
Off-therapyToxicities With Grade >1Infection with unknown ANC0 adverse events
Off-therapyToxicities With Grade >1Insomnia0 adverse events
Off-therapyToxicities With Grade >1Leukocytes (total WBC)0 adverse events
Off-therapyToxicities With Grade >1Lymphopenia0 adverse events
Off-therapyToxicities With Grade >1Mucositis/stomatitis (functional/symptomatic)0 adverse events
Off-therapyToxicities With Grade >1Nausea0 adverse events
Off-therapyToxicities With Grade >1Thrombosis/thrombus/embolism0 adverse events
Off-therapyToxicities With Grade >1Neuropathy: motor0 adverse events
Off-therapyToxicities With Grade >1Neuropathy: sensory0 adverse events
Off-therapyToxicities With Grade >1Neutrophils/granulocytes (ANC/AGC)0 adverse events
Off-therapyToxicities With Grade >1Pain0 adverse events
Off-therapyToxicities With Grade >1Phosphate0 adverse events
Off-therapyToxicities With Grade >1Platelets0 adverse events
Off-therapyToxicities With Grade >1Potassium0 adverse events
Off-therapyToxicities With Grade >1Sodium0 adverse events
Off-therapyToxicities With Grade >1Vomiting1 adverse events
Off-therapyToxicities With Grade >1Alanine transaminase (ALT)0 adverse events
Off-therapyToxicities With Grade >1Aspartate transaminase (AST)0 adverse events
Off-therapyToxicities With Grade >1Syndromes - Other0 adverse events
Off-therapyToxicities With Grade >1Allergic reaction/hypersensitivity0 adverse events
Off-therapyToxicities With Grade >1Constipation0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 3Toxicities With Grade >1Constipation1 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 3Toxicities With Grade >1GGT (gamma-Glutamyltranspeptidase)0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 3Toxicities With Grade >1Syndromes - Other0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 3Toxicities With Grade >1Vomiting4 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 3Toxicities With Grade >1Febrile neutropenia5 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 3Toxicities With Grade >1Alanine transaminase (ALT)0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 3Toxicities With Grade >1Glucose0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 3Toxicities With Grade >1Insomnia0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 3Toxicities With Grade >1Thrombosis/embolism (vascular access-related)0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 3Toxicities With Grade >1Thrombosis/thrombus/embolism0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 3Toxicities With Grade >1Lymphopenia0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 3Toxicities With Grade >1Aspartate transaminase (AST)0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 3Toxicities With Grade >1Mucositis/stomatitis (functional/symptomatic)1 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 3Toxicities With Grade >1Pain1 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 3Toxicities With Grade >1Leukocytes (total WBC)19 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 3Toxicities With Grade >1Nausea2 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 3Toxicities With Grade >1Infection with unknown ANC1 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 3Toxicities With Grade >1Infection - Other0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 3Toxicities With Grade >1Fever (in the absence of neutropenia)0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 3Toxicities With Grade >1Phosphate0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 3Toxicities With Grade >1Neuropathy: sensory1 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 3Toxicities With Grade >1Infection with Grade 3 or 4 neutrophils2 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 3Toxicities With Grade >1Ileus, GI (functional obstruction of bowel)0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 3Toxicities With Grade >1Allergic reaction/hypersensitivity0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 3Toxicities With Grade >1Platelets3 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 3Toxicities With Grade >1Hypoxia0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 3Toxicities With Grade >1Neuropathy: motor1 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 3Toxicities With Grade >1Potassium0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 3Toxicities With Grade >1Hemoglobin2 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 3Toxicities With Grade >1Infection with normal ANC or Grade 1-2 neutrophils1 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 3Toxicities With Grade >1Sodium0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 3Toxicities With Grade >1Neutrophils/granulocytes (ANC/AGC)9 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 4Toxicities With Grade >1Thrombosis/embolism (vascular access-related)0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 4Toxicities With Grade >1Hypoxia0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 4Toxicities With Grade >1Syndromes - Other0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 4Toxicities With Grade >1Infection with Grade 3 or 4 neutrophils0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 4Toxicities With Grade >1Neutrophils/granulocytes (ANC/AGC)30 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 4Toxicities With Grade >1Glucose1 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 4Toxicities With Grade >1Constipation0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 4Toxicities With Grade >1Sodium0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 4Toxicities With Grade >1Alanine transaminase (ALT)0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 4Toxicities With Grade >1Neuropathy: motor0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 4Toxicities With Grade >1Phosphate0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 4Toxicities With Grade >1Allergic reaction/hypersensitivity0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 4Toxicities With Grade >1GGT (gamma-Glutamyltranspeptidase)0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 4Toxicities With Grade >1Fever (in the absence of neutropenia)0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 4Toxicities With Grade >1Neuropathy: sensory0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 4Toxicities With Grade >1Infection - Other0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 4Toxicities With Grade >1Lymphopenia0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 4Toxicities With Grade >1Ileus, GI (functional obstruction of bowel)0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 4Toxicities With Grade >1Infection with unknown ANC0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 4Toxicities With Grade >1Leukocytes (total WBC)5 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 4Toxicities With Grade >1Potassium0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 4Toxicities With Grade >1Infection with normal ANC or Grade 1-2 neutrophils0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 4Toxicities With Grade >1Mucositis/stomatitis (functional/symptomatic)0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 4Toxicities With Grade >1Hemoglobin0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 4Toxicities With Grade >1Platelets0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 4Toxicities With Grade >1Vomiting0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 4Toxicities With Grade >1Pain1 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 4Toxicities With Grade >1Insomnia0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 4Toxicities With Grade >1Aspartate transaminase (AST)0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 4Toxicities With Grade >1Febrile neutropenia2 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 4Toxicities With Grade >1Nausea0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 4Toxicities With Grade >1Thrombosis/thrombus/embolism0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 5Toxicities With Grade >1Allergic reaction/hypersensitivity0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 5Toxicities With Grade >1Thrombosis/embolism (vascular access-related)0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 5Toxicities With Grade >1Infection with unknown ANC0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 5Toxicities With Grade >1Neuropathy: motor0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 5Toxicities With Grade >1Neuropathy: sensory0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 5Toxicities With Grade >1Infection with normal ANC or Grade 1-2 neutrophils0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 5Toxicities With Grade >1Neutrophils/granulocytes (ANC/AGC)0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 5Toxicities With Grade >1Thrombosis/thrombus/embolism0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 5Toxicities With Grade >1Infection - Other0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 5Toxicities With Grade >1Febrile neutropenia0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 5Toxicities With Grade >1Pain0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 5Toxicities With Grade >1Vomiting0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 5Toxicities With Grade >1Infection with Grade 3 or 4 neutrophils0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 5Toxicities With Grade >1Phosphate0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 5Toxicities With Grade >1Ileus, GI (functional obstruction of bowel)0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 5Toxicities With Grade >1Platelets0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 5Toxicities With Grade >1Hypoxia0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 5Toxicities With Grade >1Hemoglobin0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 5Toxicities With Grade >1Potassium0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 5Toxicities With Grade >1GGT (gamma-Glutamyltranspeptidase)0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 5Toxicities With Grade >1Aspartate transaminase (AST)0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 5Toxicities With Grade >1Sodium0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 5Toxicities With Grade >1Glucose0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 5Toxicities With Grade >1Alanine transaminase (ALT)0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 5Toxicities With Grade >1Syndromes - Other0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 5Toxicities With Grade >1Fever (in the absence of neutropenia)0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 5Toxicities With Grade >1Constipation0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 5Toxicities With Grade >1Lymphopenia0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 5Toxicities With Grade >1Leukocytes (total WBC)0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 5Toxicities With Grade >1Mucositis/stomatitis (functional/symptomatic)0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 5Toxicities With Grade >1Insomnia0 adverse events
HOD99 - Grade 5Toxicities With Grade >1Nausea0 adverse events

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 8, 2026