Skip to content

BEST (Burn Center Evaluation of Standard Therapies) Ventilator Mode Study-

BEST (Burn Center Evaluation of Standard Therapies) Ventilator Mode Study: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00351741
Enrollment
62
Registered
2006-07-13
Start date
2006-07-31
Completion date
2010-02-28
Last updated
2015-09-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Burns

Keywords

Burns

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare High Frequency Pressure Ventilation (HFPV) to conventional mechanical ventilation. Hypothesis: Patients placed on HFPV will have significantly higher number of ventilator-free days compared to patients placed on a conventional volume mode.

Detailed description

This is a prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing HFPV to conventional ventilator modes in the support of burn patients with respiratory failure. Burn patients who develop the need for mechanical ventilation present a variety of challenges that call for innovative therapeutic options. Even in the absence of smoke inhalation injury,decreased chest wall compliance from full thickness burns as well as massive fluid requirements are just a few variables that make it difficult to achieve gas exchange goals when attempting to apply conventional lung protective strategies recommended by the ARDS Net investigators.

Interventions

DEVICEVentilation - High Frequency Percussive Ventilation

Ventilatory support delivering high frequency percussive ventilation using the Volumetric Diffusive Respirator

DEVICEVentilation - ARDSnet

Respiratory support with a conventional mode of ventilation using a conventional ventilator (Draeger Evita XL)

Sponsors

United States Army Institute of Surgical Research
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients who are deemed to require ventilatory support for more than 24 hours from the time of screening.

Exclusion criteria

* Anticipated extubation within 24 hours of screening * Patients who are pregnant Patients not expected to survive for more than 24 hours

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ventilator-free Days During the First 28 Days28 daysThe primary end point was ventilator-free days in the first 28 days, defined as the number of days after randomization from day 0 to day 28 alive without ventilator assistance for at least 48 consecutive hrs.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Deathduring hospitalizationIn-hospital death.
Ventilator Associated Pneumonia28 daysThose who develop both clinical and microscopic evidence of pulmonary infection while on the ventilator.
Days Free From Nonpulmonary Organ Failure28days free from nonpulmonary organ failure as adapted from the ARDSnet study in the first 28 days.
Barotrauma28 daysDefined as a new pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, subcutaneous emphysema, interstitial emphysema, or pneumatocele \>2 cm in diameter not associated with a vascular procedure, lung biopsy, or thoracentesis.
Ventilator Associated Tracheobronchitis (VATB)checked dailyDefined as carinal or mainstem airway friability and sloughing with associated bleeding. Only diagnosed after the patient had spent at least 7 days on the assigned ventilator mode and had not been diagnosed with inhalation injury on admission
Need for Rescue Ventilator28 daysSubjects who did not meet predetermined oxygenation and ventilation goals on the study mode despite ventilator- specific optimization were switched to a rescue mode of ventilation.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

After 3 yrs of enrollment, interim analysis revealed a significant number of subjects in the LTV arm required rescue, which served as the trigger to close the study to further enrollment. Between April 2006 and May 2009, 387 patients were screened for eligibility. 155 patients met criteria of which 62 were randomized, 31 in each arm.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
High Frequency
Intervention with high frequency percussive ventilation
31
Conventional
Low-tidal volume ventilation
31
Total62

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicConventionalHigh FrequencyTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
29 Participants29 Participants58 Participants
Age, Continuous37 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18
35 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18
36 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18
Region of Enrollment
United States
31 participants31 participants62 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants4 Participants9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
26 Participants27 Participants53 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 310 / 31
serious
Total, serious adverse events
10 / 3116 / 31

Outcome results

Primary

Ventilator-free Days During the First 28 Days

The primary end point was ventilator-free days in the first 28 days, defined as the number of days after randomization from day 0 to day 28 alive without ventilator assistance for at least 48 consecutive hrs.

Time frame: 28 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High FrequencyVentilator-free Days During the First 28 Days12 DaysStandard Deviation 9
ConventionalVentilator-free Days During the First 28 Days11 DaysStandard Deviation 9
Secondary

Barotrauma

Defined as a new pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, subcutaneous emphysema, interstitial emphysema, or pneumatocele \>2 cm in diameter not associated with a vascular procedure, lung biopsy, or thoracentesis.

Time frame: 28 days

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
High FrequencyBarotrauma0 Participants
ConventionalBarotrauma4 Participants
Secondary

Days Free From Nonpulmonary Organ Failure

days free from nonpulmonary organ failure as adapted from the ARDSnet study in the first 28 days.

Time frame: 28

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High FrequencyDays Free From Nonpulmonary Organ Failure15 DaysStandard Deviation 11
ConventionalDays Free From Nonpulmonary Organ Failure15 DaysStandard Deviation 10
Secondary

Death

In-hospital death.

Time frame: during hospitalization

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
High FrequencyDeath6 Participants
ConventionalDeath6 Participants
Secondary

Need for Rescue Ventilator

Subjects who did not meet predetermined oxygenation and ventilation goals on the study mode despite ventilator- specific optimization were switched to a rescue mode of ventilation.

Time frame: 28 days

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
High FrequencyNeed for Rescue Ventilator2 Participants
ConventionalNeed for Rescue Ventilator9 Participants
Secondary

Ventilator Associated Pneumonia

Those who develop both clinical and microscopic evidence of pulmonary infection while on the ventilator.

Time frame: 28 days

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
High FrequencyVentilator Associated Pneumonia10 Participants
ConventionalVentilator Associated Pneumonia16 Participants
Secondary

Ventilator Associated Tracheobronchitis (VATB)

Defined as carinal or mainstem airway friability and sloughing with associated bleeding. Only diagnosed after the patient had spent at least 7 days on the assigned ventilator mode and had not been diagnosed with inhalation injury on admission

Time frame: checked daily

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
High FrequencyVentilator Associated Tracheobronchitis (VATB)2 Participants
ConventionalVentilator Associated Tracheobronchitis (VATB)0 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 30, 2026