Skip to content

Trial Comparing Dual Probe Ultrasonic Lithotripsy to a Single Probe Ultrasonic Lithotripsy

Randomized Control Trial Comparing Dual Probe Ultrasonic Lithotripsy to a Single Probe Ultrasonic Lithotripsy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00351351
Enrollment
70
Registered
2006-07-12
Start date
2006-07-31
Completion date
2008-05-31
Last updated
2017-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Kidney Stones

Keywords

Kidney Stones, Renal Calculi

Brief summary

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL), in conjunction with intracorporeal lithotripsy, allows for the rapid removal of any kidney stone regardless of size. Currently, the choice of intracorporeal lithotripters includes ultrasonic, pneumatic, and combined ultrasonic/pneumatic energy sources. Recently, a novel dual probe design as been introduced by Cybersonics of Erie, Pennsylvania. This dual probe intracorporeal lithotrite is called the Cyberwand, and is composed of a fixed inner probe vibrating at an ultrasonic frequency with an outer probe vibrating at about 1,000 Hz. As this new design has the potential to revolutionize intracorporeal lithotripsy, we intend to compare this novel technology to currently available lithotripsy technology in a randomized clinical trial.

Detailed description

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) is used to remove large and complex stones from the upper urinary tract. Intracorporeal lithotripsy is an integral part of PNL. Commercially available intracorporeal lithotripsy modalities include ultrasonic, pneumatic, and combined ultrasonic and pneumatic models. Each modality has its inherent advantages and disadvantages. Ultrasonic lithotrites are capable of fragmenting stones while concomitantly suctioning out fragments. Unfortunately some stones are hard enough to resist fragmentation from ultrasonic lithotripsy. Pneumatic lithotrites are able to fragment all stones regardless of hardness, but this modality is unable to suction out stone pieces at the same time fragmentation is occurring. The newest lithotrite which combines both ultrasonic and pneumatic components is capable of fragmenting any stone, but also has some inherent limitations. The handpiece of the lithotripsy device is somewhat cumbersome, the suction component can clog, and the device has overheated at the maximal settings (Kuo et al). Current intracorporeal lithotrites, while functional, can certainly be improved. Recently, a novel dual probe design has been introduced by Cybersonics of Erie, PA. This dual probe intracorporeal lithotrite is called the Cyberwand and is composed of a fixed inner probe vibrating at an ultrasonic frequency with an outer probe vibrating at about 1,000 Hz. As this new design has the potential to revolutionalize intracorporeal lithotripsy, we intend to compare this novel technology to currently available lithotripsy technology in a randomized clinical trial.

Interventions

DEVICECyberwand

FDA approved - dual probe intracorporeal lithotrite

DEVICEsingle probe ultrasonic

FDA-approved - single probe ultrasonic

Sponsors

Indiana Kidney Stone Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient of Methodist Urology in Indianapolis, IN * Undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy for calculi greater than 2 cm * Age 18 years or older * Stone easily visible/measurable on kidney, ureters and bladder (KUB) or computed tomography (CT) scan preoperatively

Exclusion criteria

* Radiolucent stones * Size of largest stone less than 2 cm * Pregnancy * Inability to give informed consent * Multiple percutaneous access anticipated * Active urinary tract infection * Recent (within last 3 months) extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Kidney Stone Clearance Rate6 monthsstone clearance rate calculated in mm\^2/min per protocol specification

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy with a target stone size greater than 2cm

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cyberwand
Cyberwand Cyberwand : FDA approved - dual probe intracorporeal lithotrite
34
Currently Available Lithotripsy Techology
Currently available lithotripsy technology single probe ultrasonic : FDA-approved - single probe ultrasonic
36
Total70

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall Studysurgical access pbs; device issues94

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCyberwandCurrently Available Lithotripsy TechologyTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
6 Participants5 Participants11 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
28 Participants31 Participants59 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
10 participants10 participants20 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
24 participants26 participants50 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants14 Participants28 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
20 Participants22 Participants42 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
10 / 3415 / 36
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 340 / 36

Outcome results

Primary

Kidney Stone Clearance Rate

stone clearance rate calculated in mm\^2/min per protocol specification

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Sample size calculations were performed using a two-sided Student's t-test with a power of 90% and a significance level of α = 0.05

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
CyberwandKidney Stone Clearance Rate61.9 mm^2/min
Currently Available Lithotripsy TechologyKidney Stone Clearance Rate75.8 mm^2/min

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026