Skip to content

Clonidine Versus Adenosine to Treat Neuropathic Pain

Clonidine Versus Adenosine to Treat Neuropathic Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00349921
Enrollment
24
Registered
2006-07-10
Start date
2004-08-31
Completion date
2008-01-31
Last updated
2018-09-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain

Keywords

pain, chronic pain, clonidine, adenosine, complex regional pain syndrome, CRPS, a2-adrenergic agonists, alpha2-adrenergic agonists

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of clonidine and adenosine on nerve pain.

Detailed description

This study is part of a pain center grant that focuses on how pain, especially chronic neuropathic pain, alters the response to traditional and non-traditional analgesics (pain medications). Clonidine-a drug commonly used to treat high blood pressure-has been shown to effectively treat neuropathic pain, is FDA-approved for administration via epidural (an injection given in the lower back), and is the third most commonly prescribed drug for chronic intrathecal (an injection into the cerebrospinal fluid) use in people with chronic pain. Adenosine-a drug commonly administered intravenously (into a vein) to treat certain types of abnormal heart rhythms-has been found to reduce areas of allodynia (pain caused by a stimulus that does not normally cause pain) after intrathecal, but not intravenous administration in people with neuropathic pain. Intrathecal clonidine relieves pain by actions on a2-adrenoceptors in the spinal cord, whereas adenosine relieves pain by actions on A1 adenosine receptors. Researchers believe that intrathecal adenosine and clonidine may prove to be excellent painkillers for nerve pain. Therefore, the goal of this study is to determine the effects of clonidine and adenosine on nerve pain. After initial screening, baseline measurements, and training to learn to estimate pain accurately using thermal heat testing, a sample of spinal fluid will be taken from each participant. Participants then will be randomly chosen to receive either clonidine, adenosine, or placebo. After receiving the study medication, participants will be monitored, with their vital signs checked at 30, 60, 120, 180, and 240 minutes. Duration of the study for participants is 2 weeks, and includes two visits to the research center, each lasting approximately 6 hours.

Interventions

DRUGclonidine

Clonidine-a drug commonly used to treat high blood pressure-has been shown to effectively treat neuropathic pain, is FDA-approved for administration via epidural (an injection given in the lower back), and is the third most commonly prescribed drug for chronic intrathecal (an injection into the cerebrospinal fluid) use in people with chronic pain.

DRUGadenosine

Adenosine-a drug commonly administered intravenously (into a vein) to treat certain types of abnormal heart rhythms-has been found to reduce areas of allodynia (pain caused by a stimulus that does not normally cause pain) after intrathecal, but not intravenous administration in people with neuropathic pain.

DRUGplacebo

inactive substance

Sponsors

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
CollaboratorNIH
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), type I involving a lower extremity

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy * Allergy to clonidine * Currently taking clonidine or other direct a2-adrenergic agonists, or taking cholinesterase inhibitors * Patients with any serious or unstable medical problems (heart, lung, liver, kidney, or nervous system disease)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number Meeting Success Criterionbaseline and 2 hoursVerbal pain report 2 hours post injection compared to baseline verbal pain scores prior to injection

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

24 Subjects with chronic pain were recruited from the Center for Clinical Research. Each subject was scheduled for a study visit and randomized to receive spinal clonidine, spinal adenosine or placebo. The subject was scheduled for a second study visit and received the opposite treatment from the first visit.

Pre-assignment details

24 subjects consented and enrolled 2 subjects withdrawn prior to group assignment because they did not meet inclusion / exclusion criteria on second review

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Clonidine First, Then Adenosine
clonidine given in first injection adenosine given in second injection
10
Adenosine Given First, Then Clonidine
adenosine given in first injection clonidine given in second injection
10
Clonidine Given First, Then Placebo
clonidine given first placebo given in second injection
1
Adenosine First, Then Placebo
adenosine given in first injection placebo given in second injection
1
Total22

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
First Spinal InjectionAdverse Event0010
First Spinal InjectionPhysician Decision1000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAdenosine Given First, Then ClonidineClonidine Given First, Then PlaceboClonidine First, Then AdenosineAdenosine First, Then PlaceboTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
10 Participants1 Participants10 Participants1 Participants22 Participants
Age, Continuous43.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8
19 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0
45.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.4
54 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0
43.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
Region of Enrollment
United States
10 participants1 participants10 participants1 participants22 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants1 Participants8 Participants1 Participants14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 110 / 110 / 10 / 1
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 110 / 110 / 10 / 1

Outcome results

Primary

Number Meeting Success Criterion

Verbal pain report 2 hours post injection compared to baseline verbal pain scores prior to injection

Time frame: baseline and 2 hours

Population: The primary outcome measure will be % change in pain report 2 hr following injection, using a response criterion of 30% reduction in ongoing pain.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ClonidineNumber Meeting Success Criterion10 participants meeting success criterion
AdenosineNumber Meeting Success Criterion5 participants meeting success criterion
PlaceboNumber Meeting Success Criterion0 participants meeting success criterion
Comparison: Null hypothesis is that there is no difference between the groups in proportion of patients meeting the success criterion of \>30% reduction in visual analog scale pain 120 min after intrathecal injectionp-value: >0.05Chi-squared

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026