Skip to content

A Feasibility Study of the Cordis Neurovascular Self Expanding Stent System in Intracranial Arteries

A Feasibility Study of the Cordis Neurovascular Self Expanding Stent System in Intracranial Arteries

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00349908
Enrollment
20
Registered
2006-07-10
Start date
2006-09-30
Completion date
2009-03-31
Last updated
2014-06-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aneurysm, Atherosclerosis

Keywords

Atherosclerosis,Wide Neck Aneurysm

Brief summary

Feasibility study to assess safety of treating patients with self expanding stent in intracranial arteries.

Detailed description

Feasibility study to assess safety of treating patients with self expanding stent in intracranial arteries. Patients will be followed for 6 months with assessments related to technical feasibility and adverse events.

Interventions

DEVICECordis Neurovascular ENTERPRISE Self Expanding Stent System

Implantation of the device ENTERPRISE used to treat symptomatic stenosis in intracranial arteries.

Sponsors

Codman & Shurtleff
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Contact site for specific information Inclusion Criteria: * Subject meet specific criteria for treatment * Subject must be willing to return to site for 30 day and 6 month follow up evaluations

Exclusion criteria

* Stenting, angioplasty or endarterectomy of an extracranial (carotid or vertebral artery) or intracranial artery within 30 days prior to expected enrollment date * Previously implanted carotid stent associated with the symptomatic distribution within the past 12 weeks

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Technical Feasibility- Percent Occlusion (6 Mo Post Procedure)6 mo6 Months post
Technical Feasibility- Successful Stent/Coil Placement (Post Procedure)post procedureSuccessful placement of the product assessed immediately post procedure
Technical Feasibility- Percent Occlusion (Post Procedure)post procedureOcclusion evaluated immediately post procedure
Technical Feasibility- Percent Stenosis (Post Procedure)Post ProcedurePercent Stenosis assessed immediately post procedure from pre procedure
Technical Feasibility- Successful Stent/Coil Placement (6 Mo Post Procedure)6 moSuccessful stent/coil placement assessed at 6 mo post
Technical Feasibility- Percent Stenosis (6 mo Post Procedure)6 moPercent Stenosis assessed 6 mo Post Procedure from pre-procedure

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Secondary Outcome Measure in Group 1, Atherosclerosis and in Group 2, Aneurysm, is the Evaluation of Adverse Events. The Groups Were Analyzed Separately.6 monthsAn adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject.

Countries

Argentina

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients were recruited at 1 hospital in Argentina in 2006 and 2007 and treated with Codman Neurovascular Self-Expanding Stent System.

Pre-assignment details

This is a device study, there was no wash out or run-in phase for transition.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Aneurysm Arm
Intracranial wide-necked aneurysms
10
Atherosclerosis Arm
Symptomatic stenosis in intracranial arteries
10
Total20

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject04

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAtherosclerosis ArmAneurysm ArmTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
9 Participants10 Participants19 Participants
Age, Continuous63.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
64 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
63.85 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
Region of Enrollment
Argentina
10 participants10 participants20 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants8 Participants16 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
8 / 109 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 103 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Technical Feasibility- Percent Occlusion (6 Mo Post Procedure)

6 Months post

Time frame: 6 mo

Population: Group 1 - Atherosclerosis Arm not analyzed for occlusion. Occlusion only relevant in Aneurysm treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Group 2Technical Feasibility- Percent Occlusion (6 Mo Post Procedure)88.8 percent occlusion
Primary

Technical Feasibility- Percent Occlusion (Post Procedure)

Occlusion evaluated immediately post procedure

Time frame: post procedure

Population: Group 1 - Atherosclerosis Arm not analyzed for occlusion. Occlusion only relevant in Aneurysm treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Group 2Technical Feasibility- Percent Occlusion (Post Procedure)86.8 percent occlusion
Primary

Technical Feasibility- Percent Stenosis (6 mo Post Procedure)

Percent Stenosis assessed 6 mo Post Procedure from pre-procedure

Time frame: 6 mo

Population: Group 2 - Aneurysm Arm not analyzed for stenosis. Stenosis only relevant in Atherosclerosis treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group 1Technical Feasibility- Percent Stenosis (6 mo Post Procedure)-47.3 Percentage change from PreProcedureStandard Deviation 21.2
Primary

Technical Feasibility- Percent Stenosis (Post Procedure)

Percent Stenosis assessed immediately post procedure from pre procedure

Time frame: Post Procedure

Population: Group 2 - Aneurysm Arm not analyzed for stenosis. Stenosis only relevant in Atherosclerosis treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group 1Technical Feasibility- Percent Stenosis (Post Procedure)-38.5 Percentage Change from PreProcedureStandard Deviation 18.3
Primary

Technical Feasibility- Successful Stent/Coil Placement (6 Mo Post Procedure)

Successful stent/coil placement assessed at 6 mo post

Time frame: 6 mo

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group 1Technical Feasibility- Successful Stent/Coil Placement (6 Mo Post Procedure)100 Percentage of stable stent/coil placemen
Group 2Technical Feasibility- Successful Stent/Coil Placement (6 Mo Post Procedure)100 Percentage of stable stent/coil placemen
Primary

Technical Feasibility- Successful Stent/Coil Placement (Post Procedure)

Successful placement of the product assessed immediately post procedure

Time frame: post procedure

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)Dispersion
Group 1Technical Feasibility- Successful Stent/Coil Placement (Post Procedure)100 percentage of stable placement 47.3
Group 2Technical Feasibility- Successful Stent/Coil Placement (Post Procedure)90 percentage of stable placement 14.7
Secondary

The Secondary Outcome Measure in Group 1, Atherosclerosis and in Group 2, Aneurysm, is the Evaluation of Adverse Events. The Groups Were Analyzed Separately.

An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Group 1 and Group 2 were analyzed separately. In group 1 Atherosclerosis, 25 unique adverse events were reported in 8 of the 10 eligible subjects. In group 2 aneurysm, 28 unique adverse events were reported in 9 of the 10 eligible subjects.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group 1The Secondary Outcome Measure in Group 1, Atherosclerosis and in Group 2, Aneurysm, is the Evaluation of Adverse Events. The Groups Were Analyzed Separately.25 Number of adverse events
Group 2The Secondary Outcome Measure in Group 1, Atherosclerosis and in Group 2, Aneurysm, is the Evaluation of Adverse Events. The Groups Were Analyzed Separately.28 Number of adverse events

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026