Skip to content

Healthy Endothelial Accelerated Lining Inhibits Neointimal Growth

Healthy Endothelial Accelerated Lining Inhibits Neointimal Growth. A Clinical, Multi-center, Prospective, Non-Randomized Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00349895
Enrollment
100
Registered
2006-07-10
Start date
2006-08-31
Completion date
2012-01-31
Last updated
2014-04-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Stenosis

Keywords

Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty, Stent implantation

Brief summary

This is a multi-center, prospective, non-randomized study. Approximately 90 patients from up to 16 centers will be entered in the study. Patients will be followed clinically for up to 5 years post-procedure. All patients will have a repeat angiography at 6 months follow-up. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Genous Bio-engineered R stentTM in conjunction with optimal statin therapy (80mg of atorvastatin), in the treatment of elective patients with up to two de novo native coronary artery lesions. The Genous stent received CE mark for the intended indication in August 2005

Detailed description

Currently available coronary stents are prone to thrombosis and restenosis. It is believed that the accelerated re-establishment of a functional endothelial layer on damaged stented vascular segments may help to prevent potentially serious complications by providing a barrier to circulating cytokines, and by the ability of endothelial cells to produce substances that passivate the underlying smooth muscle cell layer. By recruiting the patient's own EPCs to the site of vascular injury (e.g. the site of a coronary stent implant), an acceleration of the normal endothelialization process would occur. It is theorized that the rapid establishment of a functioning endothelial layer may promote the transformation of the injured site to a healthy state. For example, in the case of coronary stent implantation, rapid re-endothelialization may reduce inflammation, thrombosis and potentially eliminate restenosis. The influences of EPC recruitment and reendothelialization on restenosis range from the effects on the vascular repair response, to the prevention of platelet aggregation and activation, angiogenesis, and enhancement of vasomotor response. Recently it has been shown that the integrity and functional activity of the endothelial monolayer play a crucial role in the prevention of atherosclerosis. However, risk factors for coronary artery disease such as age, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and diabetes reduce the number and functional activity of these circulating EPCs, thus limiting the regenerative capacity. The impairment of stem cells by risk factors in CAD patients may contribute to the limited regenerative capacity of diseased endothelium, as well as to atherogenesis and atherosclerotic disease progression. Therefore, relating the number and function of circulating EPCs to the functional outcome of stent technology is crucial to identify a beneficial effect on in-stent restenosis formation and vascular (dys) function. The HEALING FIM and HEALING II clinical studies sought to define the safety and efficacy of a stent designed to sequester circulating endothelial progenitor cells to the luminal surface of the stent struts by an anti-CD34 antibody coating, thereby promoting reendothelialization of the coronary stent and the vascular healing response following stent deployment. Enhanced vascular healing will reinstate vascular integrity, prevent platelet aggregation and sub-acute in-stent thrombosis, reinstate vasoreactivity and inhibit restenosis formation. In the HEALING II study, a correlation was found between EPC levels and angiographic/IVUS outcomes in patients receiving the Genous stent. Patients with normal EPC titers had significantly less in-stent late loss compared to those with low EPCs (0.53 vs 1.02mm). This is consistent with the results from drug eluting stent trials, thereby establishing proof of concept of the EPC capturing technology, provided adequate EPC target cell population is available. There are several animal studies demonstrating that statin therapy was associated with a 2.5 to 3 fold increase of circulating EPCs leading to accelerated reendothelialization, vascular repair and improved angiogenesis. In addition, Dimmeler and co-workers found similar results in a small cohort of cardiovascular patients receiving atorvastatin therapy (n=7, Circulation 2001), suggesting an angiotrophic effect of atorvastatin therapy in addition to its previously defined pleiotrophic properties. Similarly, Drexler and co-workers described similar EPC recruiting properties of simvastatin in CAD patients unrelated to/ irrespective of LDL reduction (n=10, Circulation 2005). The current study seeks to confirm the safety and optimize the effectiveness of the EPC capture technology (Genous Bio-engineered R stent) by incorporating a high dose statin therapy, specifically atorvastatin 80mg, for at least two weeks prior to the index procedure.

Interventions

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Sponsors

OrbusNeich
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. 18 to 85 years of age; 2. Symptomatic ischemic heart disease (CCS class 1-4, Braunwald class IB, IC, and/or objective evidence of myocardial ischemia); 3. Treatment of 1 or 2 de novo lesions; 4. Target lesion(s) is(are) located in a native coronary artery, which can be covered by one single stent of maximum 33 mm; The coronary artery lesion should be ≤27 mm in length (a margin of 3mm proximal and 3mm distal is recommended) and should be entirely covered by one single Genous Bio-engineered R stentTM . If predilation of the lesion is visually deemed necessary it should be performed prior to measuring the length of the lesion. 5. Reference vessel diameter ≥ 2.5 and ≤ 3.75 mm by visual estimate; 6. Acceptable candidate for coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG); 7. Target lesion stenosis is ≥50% and \<100% (minimum TIMI flow I at the time of the PCI procedure) (visual estimate); 8. The patient is willing to comply with the specified follow-up evaluation; 9. The patient has been informed of the nature of the study agrees to its provisions and has provided written informed consent, approved by the appropriate Ethics Committee (EC).

Exclusion criteria

General

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary endpoint of this study is in-stent late loss by Quantitative Coronary Angiography (QCA).at 6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Procedure success.during the index hospitalization
Angiographic and/or clinical stent thrombosis.Up to 5 years
In-stent late lossat 18 months.
Binary restenosis rateat 6 and 18 months.
In-segment late loss.at 6 and 18 months
Volumetric assessment (derived from QCA parameters).at 6 and 18 months
Angiographic success.during procedure
Target Vessel Failure (TVF)at 30 days, 6, 12, 18 months and at 2, 3, 4 and 5 years.
Major adverse cardiac events (MACE)at 30 days, 6, 12, 18 months and at 2, 3, 4 and 5 years.
Clinically-driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) free rateat 30 days, 6, 12 and 18 months and at 2, 3, 4 and 5 years.
Protocol related serious adverse events (SAEs)up to 5 years.
Change in human anti-murine antibody (HAMA) plasma levelsat 1 and 6 months follow-up as compared to baseline.
Circulating endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) countat screening, index procedure and at 30 days.

Countries

Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Netherlands, United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026