Skip to content

Conservative or Operative Treatment for the Shoulder Impingement Syndrome?

Conservative or Operative Treatment for the Shoulder Impingement Syndrome? A Randomized Controlled Trial of 140 Patients Followed Up for Two Years.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00349648
Enrollment
140
Registered
2006-07-07
Start date
2001-03-31
Completion date
2006-07-31
Last updated
2006-07-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Shoulder Impingement Syndrome

Keywords

subacromial, impingement, acromioplasty, physiotherapy

Brief summary

Study hypothesis: The impingement syndrome of the rotator cuff is a common cause of shoulder pain for which the most effective treatment is unknown. Steroid injections and anti-inflammatory analgetics are considered as effective methods. Physiotherapy and acromioplasty are commonly used treatments. Hypothesis: Arthroscopy and acromioplasty in addition to conservative treatment is equally effective as conservative treatment alone for shoulder impingement syndrome.

Detailed description

The aim of this study was to examine the effectiveness of arthroscopic acromioplasty in the treatment of the shoulder impingement syndrome. Nonoperative treatment consisted of information given by a trained physiotherapist. The patients were supervised with a progressive programme to improve the mobility and muscle strength of the shoulder region which was regularly controlled. The exercises aimed at strengthening the stabilising muscles of the glenohumeral joint (m. trapezius, m. deltoides, m. supraspinatus and m. infraspinatus) and activating the decompressive muscles of the the subacromial space (m. teres major and minor, m. subscapularis). The programme lasted for three months. In addition the patients were given advice for daily home exercise. In the surgical group the patients underwent an arthroscopic examination and acromioplasty done by one experienced orthopaedic specialist. Postoperatively the patients received similar physiotherapeutical information and training programme than in the conservative treatment group. The follow-up evaluations were performed at 3, 6 and 12 months from the beginning of each treatment in addition at 24 months counted from the randomization. A trained research physiotherapist who was blinded to the treatment group and had not been involved in their treatment performed a standardized assessment of all patients. The range of motion, muscle strengths and Neer´s tests were recorded. At each evaluation the patients completed a structured questionnaire.

Interventions

PROCEDUREacromioplasty

Sponsors

Kanta-Häme Central Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* a positive clinical Neer's test * shoulder pain resistant to rest * shoulder pain resistant to anti-inflammatory drugs * shoulder pain resistant to subacromial steroid injections * shoulder pain resistant to ordinary physiotherapy with a minimum history of three months

Exclusion criteria

* glenohumeral or acromioclavicular arthritis * glenohumeral instability * total rupture of the rotator cuff * cervical syndrome * adhesive capsulitis * neuropathy of the shoulder region

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
shoulder pain in visual analogue scale (VAS) of 0-10 at two years after randomization

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
pain at night
disability
ability to work
ranges of motion
cost-effectiveness

Countries

Finland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026