Myopia, Refractive Error
Conditions
Brief summary
A thorough ophthalmic examination of a child must include a refraction and this is often done with cycloplegia. In our study, we aim to determine at which age group a non-cycloplegic refraction technique closely correlates with a cycloplegic refraction and hence, would obviate the need for cycloplegic refraction in our routine clinical practice.
Detailed description
The accommodative response in young phakic patients has been known to result in over-estimation of myopia and subsequently inappropriate prescriptions. Therefore, the rationale for cycloplegia is to inhibit the accommodative response in order to obtain a true measurement of the refractive error. Different cycloplegic agents have been in common use for the last five decades. Cyclopentolate is widely used and is commercially available in concentrations of 0.5% and 1%. Tropicamide is another widely used cycloplegic agent and is available in 0.5% and 1% concentrations. The advantages of a non-cycloplegic technique would be firstly, the avoidance of any possible harmful effects from the cycloplegic agents used. Secondly, it would vastly reduce waiting times for parents and children and allow for a much more efficient clinical service. Finally, there may be a significant cost-saving feature involved if these cycloplegic agents are no longer required. This will be a prospective clinical audit/survey involving children between the ages of 4 years and 13 years who attend the paediatric ophthalmology clinics in KK Women's and Children's Hospital as well as the Singapore National Eye Centre. All eligible children will have had a cycloplegic refraction and a non-cycloplegic refraction with fogging. A survey of children between the ages of 4 and 13 years who have had refraction with both these techniques will be undertaken and the difference in spherical error between the 2 techniques will be recorded for each child. We aim to accumulate 15 children from each age group.
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Singapore Eye Research Institute
Singapore National Eye Centre
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Years to 13 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
1. As part of the ophthalmic evaluation, will undergo non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic refraction. 2. Informed consent has been obtained from a parent or guardian. 3. Aged between 4 years and 13 years old. 4. Able to cooperate with examination(s) as stated.
Exclusion criteria
1. Known allergy or adverse reaction to cyclopentolate. 2. Unable to cooperate with examination(s) stated. 3. Parent or guardian objection.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Mean spherical error (MSE) of less than or equal to 0.50D between the non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic refractive results . | — |
| MSE calculated by subtracting the non-cycloplegic spherical error from the cycloplegic spherical error. | — |
Countries
Singapore
Outcome results
None listed