Skip to content

Endoscopic Implantation of Enteryx for the Treatment of GERD

Endoscopic Implantation of Enteryx for the Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD): Post Market Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00346905
Enrollment
16
Registered
2006-06-30
Start date
2003-10-31
Completion date
2008-02-29
Last updated
2017-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastroesophageal Reflux

Keywords

GERD, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, Reflux, Enteryx

Brief summary

The study objective is to assess the long term safety and effectiveness of Enteryx device in commercial use. The long-term effects beyond one year of treatment with Enteryx have not been established.

Detailed description

The Enteryx procedure kit is indicated for endoscopic injection into the region of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) for the treatment of symptoms due to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms in patients responding to and requiring daily pharmacological therapy with proton pump inhibitors (PPI's). The study design consists of two parts, Part A and Part B. Part A will enroll patients who received Enteryx treatments after approval and Part B will enroll patients previously enrolled and treated in the IDE study #G000065. In total there will be at least 300 patients enrolled in Part A and Part B with 36 months of follow-up Part A: Approximately 150 to 200 patients will be enrolled from 22 centers. After patients have determined with their physicians that Enteryx is an appropriate course of therapy for their GERD symptoms, they will be asked to participate in this trial. Patients will be followed for adverse events, medication use, and GERD-HRQL symptoms at baseline, day of treatment, one month, six months, twelve months, twenty-four months, and thirty-six months. The final study visit will be thirty-six months after the last Enteryx injection. In addition, all Part A patients will be contacted by the Site at least quarterly to obtain current adverse event information. This adverse event information will be solicited from the Site by the Sponsor at least quarterly. Part B: All US IDE patients (approximately 150 patients) will be asked to enroll. Patients will be followed for adverse events, medication use, and GERD-HRQL symptoms at two visits beyond the follow-up prescribed in the IDE study, namely 24 and 36 months after the last Enteryx injection received in the IDE study. Parts A and B: There will be a breakdown of adverse events based on retreatment status. Any subsequent procedures or interventions related to GERD or Enteryx, whether surgical (such as fundoplication) or non-surgical (such as an alternative endoscopic treatment for GERD), will be collected and reported. H0: (Null hypothesis): Proportion of patients exhibiting clinically significant improvement in reduction of PPI therapy ≤ 0.5 Ha: (Alt. hypothesis): Proportion of patients exhibiting clinically significant improvement in reduction of PPI therapy \> 0.5 The Sponsor will examine the proportion of patients who have clinically significant reduction in PPI therapy at the 12, 24 and 36 month follow-ups, in an identical manner to that used for the patients in the IDE trial. The clinically significant reduction is defined as either elimination of medication use or reduction in dosage of ≥50%. The criterion for success is defined as more than half of patients demonstrating this degree of medication reduction. The hypothesis is tested by p-value and construction of the exact 95% Clopper-Pearson confidence intervals around the observed proportion of patients who meet the criterion for success. The longitudinal post-procedure follow-up data across time (repeated measures) will be analyzed to determine patterns and trends for all primary endpoints. The hypothesis stated above will also be evaluated in the subset of patients that underwent retreatment prior to amendment v.14Oct05.

Interventions

DRUGEnteryx

Sponsors

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* GERD responsive to and requiring daily PPI therapy

Exclusion criteria

* Esophageal varices, particularly related to portal hypertension • Patients whom the physician determines to be a poor candidate for endoscopic procedures and/or anesthesia. Patients must also be willing to allow their data to be shared with the Sponsor and FDA.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinically Significant Reduction of PPI Usage at 12, 24, and 36 Month Follow-ups Compared to Baseline in Both Singly Treated and Retreated Patients.3 years either baseline to 12m, baseline to 24m, baseline to 36mClinically significant reduction of PPI usage is defined as either elimination of medication use or reduction in dosage of ≥50% as compared to baseline. The criterion for success is defined as more than half of patients demonstrating this degree of medication reduction.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Referral patients experiencing moderate to severe GERD

Pre-assignment details

Those not meeting inclusion/exclustion criteria were not included

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group 1
Patients experiencing moderate GERD
16
Total16

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGroup 1
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
6 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
10 Participants
Age, Continuous61 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
Region of Enrollment
United States
16 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
16 / 16
serious
Total, serious adverse events
10 / 16

Outcome results

Primary

Clinically Significant Reduction of PPI Usage at 12, 24, and 36 Month Follow-ups Compared to Baseline in Both Singly Treated and Retreated Patients.

Clinically significant reduction of PPI usage is defined as either elimination of medication use or reduction in dosage of ≥50% as compared to baseline. The criterion for success is defined as more than half of patients demonstrating this degree of medication reduction.

Time frame: 3 years either baseline to 12m, baseline to 24m, baseline to 36m

Population: Overall Number of Participants Analyzed (16) will differ at 12m, 24m, and 36m intervals due to patients who were available at the given follow-up interval.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Enteryx TreatmentClinically Significant Reduction of PPI Usage at 12, 24, and 36 Month Follow-ups Compared to Baseline in Both Singly Treated and Retreated Patients.clinically significant reduction of PPI usage 12m56.25 % of Participants
Enteryx TreatmentClinically Significant Reduction of PPI Usage at 12, 24, and 36 Month Follow-ups Compared to Baseline in Both Singly Treated and Retreated Patients.clinically significant reduction of PPI usage 24m45.45 % of Participants
Enteryx TreatmentClinically Significant Reduction of PPI Usage at 12, 24, and 36 Month Follow-ups Compared to Baseline in Both Singly Treated and Retreated Patients.clinically significant reduction of PPI usage 36m50.00 % of Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026