Skip to content

Observation, Radiation Therapy, Combination Chemotherapy, and/or Surgery in Treating Young Patients With Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Risk-Based Treatment for Non-Rhabdomyosarcoma Soft Tissue Sarcomas (NRSTS) in Patients Under 30 Years of Age

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00346164
Enrollment
588
Registered
2006-06-29
Start date
2007-02-05
Completion date
2022-03-31
Last updated
2022-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adult Alveolar Soft-part Sarcoma, Adult Angiosarcoma, Adult Epithelioid Sarcoma, Adult Extraskeletal Chondrosarcoma, Adult Extraskeletal Osteosarcoma, Adult Fibrosarcoma, Adult Leiomyosarcoma, Adult Liposarcoma, Adult Malignant Fibrous Histiocytoma, Adult Malignant Hemangiopericytoma, Adult Malignant Mesenchymoma, Adult Neurofibrosarcoma, Adult Synovial Sarcoma, Childhood Alveolar Soft-part Sarcoma, Childhood Angiosarcoma, Childhood Epithelioid Sarcoma, Childhood Fibrosarcoma, Childhood Leiomyosarcoma, Childhood Liposarcoma, Childhood Malignant Mesenchymoma, Childhood Neurofibrosarcoma, Childhood Synovial Sarcoma, Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans, Metastatic Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Nonmetastatic Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Stage I Adult Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Stage II Adult Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Stage III Adult Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Stage IV Adult Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Brief summary

This phase III trial is studying observation to see how well a risk based treatment strategy works in patients with soft tissue sarcoma. In the study, patients are assigned to receive surgery +/- radiotherapy +/- chemotherapy depending on their risk of recurrence. Sometimes, after surgery, the tumor may not need additional treatment until it progresses. In this case, observation may be sufficient. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to kill tumor cells. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as ifosfamide and doxorubicin, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving chemotherapy and radiation therapy before surgery may make the tumor smaller and reduce the amount of normal tissue that needs to be removed. Giving these treatments after surgery may kill any tumor cells that remain after surgery.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. Define a risk-based treatment strategy comprising observation only, adjuvant radiotherapy, or adjuvant chemoradiotherapy or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy in young patients with non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma (NRSTS). II. Assess event-free and overall survival of patients treated with these regimens. III. Assess the pattern of treatment failure in these patients. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. Assess the feasibility of a neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy approach in patients with intermediate- or high-risk NRSTS. II. Assess the imaging and pathologic responses to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with intermediate- or high-risk NRSTS. III. Correlate imaging and pathologic response with clinical outcomes in patients with intermediate- or high-risk disease who undergo neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. IV. Prospectively define clinical prognostic factors associated with event-free survival, overall survival, local recurrence, and distant recurrence in these patients. V. Correlate patient outcomes with findings of biologic studies performed on tissue specimens collected on protocol COG-D9902 from these patients. VI. Determine whether the diagnosis and histologic grade of NRSTS assigned by the enrolling institution correlates with the diagnosis and histologic grade established by central expert pathology reviewers. VII. Compare the Pediatric Oncology Group (POG) and Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer (French Federation of Cancer Centers \[FNCLCC\]) pathologic grading systems to determine which better correlates with clinical outcomes. OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are divided into 3 risk groups according to presence of metastatic disease (yes vs no), status of prior surgery (resected vs unresected), grade of tumor (low vs high), and size of primary tumor (≤ 5 cm vs \> 5 cm). Patients are assigned to different treatment regimens based on disease extent (nonmetastatic vs metastatic), tumor size (≤ 5 cm vs \> 5 cm), extent of resection of primary tumor (resected vs unresected), extent of resection of metastases (complete or microscopic residual vs gross residual), microscopic tumor margins (negative vs positive), and tumor grade (low vs high). GROUP 1 (low risk \[nonmetastatic, grossly resected disease, except high-grade tumor \> 5 cm\]): Patients with low-grade tumor with either negative or positive microscopic margins or high-grade tumor ≤ 5 cm (in maximum diameter) with negative microscopic margins are assigned to regimen A. Patients with high-grade tumor ≤ 5 cm (in maximum diameter) with positive microscopic margins are assigned to regimen B. REGIMEN A (observation only): Patients undergo observation only. REGIMEN B (adjuvant radiotherapy): Beginning between 6-42 days after surgical resection, patients undergo a total of 31 fractions of adjuvant radiotherapy. GROUP 2 (intermediate risk \[nonmetastatic, resected or unresected disease\]): Patients with grossly resected, high-grade tumor \> 5 cm (in maximum diameter) are assigned to regimen C. Patients with unresected tumor are assigned to regimen D. REGIMEN C (adjuvant chemoradiotherapy): Patients receive ifosfamide IV over 3 hours on days 1-3 in weeks 1, 4, 7, 10, 13, and 16 and doxorubicin hydrochloride IV over 24 hours on days 1 and 2 in weeks 1, 4, 13, 16, and 19. Beginning in week 4, patients also undergo a total of 31 fractions of radiotherapy. \*NOTE: \*Patients who receive brachytherapy will initiate radiotherapy in Week 1. If brachytherapy is administered, chemotherapy should begin within 2 weeks of completion of brachytherapy and the Weeks 1 and 19 doxorubicin should be given instead at Weeks 7 and 10. REGIMEN D (neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy): Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery: Patients receive ifosfamide IV over 3 hours on days 1-3 in weeks 1, 4, 7, and 10 and doxorubicin hydrochloride IV over 24 hours on days 1 and 2 in weeks 1 and 4. Beginning in week 4, patients also undergo a total of 31 fractions of radiotherapy\*\*. Patients undergo surgical resection in week 13. NOTE: \*\*Patients with primary hepatic tumors do not receive radiotherapy in week 4. Adjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy: Patients receive ifosfamide IV over 3 hours on days 1-3 in weeks 16 and 19 and doxorubicin hydrochloride IV over 24 hours on days 1 and 2 in weeks 16, 19\*\*\*, and 22. Beginning in week 16, patients achieving gross total resection with positive microscopic margins undergo a total of 6 fractions of adjuvant radiotherapy. Patients achieving less than total gross resection undergo a total of 11 fractions of adjuvant radiotherapy. Patients achieving total gross resection with negative microscopic margins do not receive adjuvant radiotherapy. NOTE: \*\*\*Patients who receive adjuvant radiotherapy in week 16 receive doxorubicin hydrochloride in week 25 instead of week 19. GROUP 3 (high risk \[metastatic, resected, incompletely resected, or unresected disease\]): Patients with low-grade, all-sites resected tumor with either negative or positive microscopic margins are assigned to receive treatment as in group 1 regimen A. Patients with high-grade, grossly resected primary tumor, and metastatic disease are assigned to receive treatment as in group 2 regimen C. Patients with unresected, high-grade metastatic tumor are assigned to receive treatment as in group 2 regimen D. In all groups, treatment continues in the absence of disease progression. After completing study treatment, patients are followed periodically for at least 5 years.

Interventions

DRUGdoxorubicin hydrochloride

Given IV

OTHERclinical observation

Patients undergo observation

PROCEDUREtherapeutic conventional surgery

Patients undergo surgery

RADIATION3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy

Patients undergo radiotherapy

DRUGifosfamide

Given IV

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Children's Oncology Group
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 29 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Newly diagnosed non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma (STS), confirmed by central pathology review via concurrent enrollment on protocol COG-D9902 * Metastatic or non metastatic disease * Meets 1 of the following criteria: * Intermediate (i.e., rarely metastasizing) or malignant STS, including any of the following: * Adipocytic tumor, including liposarcoma of any of the following histology subtypes: * Dedifferentiated * Myxoid * Round cell * Pleomorphic type * Mixed-type * Not otherwise specified (NOS) * Fibroblastic/myofibroblastic tumors, including any of the following: * Solitary fibrous tumor * Hemangiopericytoma * Low-grade myofibroblastic sarcoma * Myxoinflammatory fibroblastic sarcoma * Adult fibrosarcoma\* * Myxofibrosarcoma * Low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma or hyalinizing spindle-cell tumor * Sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma * So-called fibrohistiocytic tumors, including any of the following: * Plexiform fibrohistiocytic tumor * Giant cell tumor of soft tissues * Pleomorphic malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH)/undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma * Giant cell MFH/undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma with giant cells * Inflammatory MFH/undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma with prominent inflammation * Smooth muscle tumor (leiomyosarcoma) * Pericytic \[perivascular\] tumor (malignant glomus tumor or glomangiosarcoma) * Vascular tumor, including angiosarcoma * Chondro-osseous tumors of any of the following types: * Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma * Extraskeletal osteosarcoma * Tumors of uncertain differentiation, including any of the following: * Angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma * Ossifying fibromyxoid tumor * Myoepithelioma/parachordoma * Synovial sarcoma * Epithelioid sarcoma * Alveolar soft-part sarcoma * Clear cell sarcoma of soft tissue * Extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma (chordoid type) * Malignant mesenchymoma * Neoplasms with perivascular epithelioid cell differentiation (PEComa) * Clear cell myomelanocytic tumor * Intimal sarcoma * Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor * Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans meeting both of the following criteria: * Non metastatic disease * Tumor must be grossly resected prior to study enrollment * Embryonal sarcoma of the liver * Unclassified STS that is too undifferentiated to be placed in a specific pathologic category (undifferentiated STS or STS NOS) * Gross resection of the primary tumor ≤ 42 days prior to enrollment required except if any of the following circumstances apply: * Non metastatic high-grade tumor \> 5 cm in maximal diameter and gross or microscopic residual tumor is anticipated after resection * Tumor of either high- or- low-grade that cannot be grossly excised without unacceptable morbidity * High-grade tumor with metastases * Patients with metastatic low-grade tumor whose disease is amenable to gross resection at all sites must undergo gross resection of all sites prior to study entry * Patients with a tumor recurrence after a gross total resection are not eligible * Tumors arising in bone are not eligible * Patients with epithelioid sarcoma, clear cell sarcoma, or clinical or radiologic evidence of regional lymph node enlargement must undergo sentinel lymph node biopsies or lymph node sampling to confirm the status of regional lymph nodes\* NOTE: \*Except in cases where the study radiologist reviews the imaging and indicates that a biopsy is not needed to confirm that the patient has lymph node involvement. * If lymph node biopsies are positive for tumor (or the lymph nodes are classified as positive by the study radiologist), formal lymph node dissection must be done at the time of definitive surgery(prior to study entry for patients assigned to study regimen C) * Patients with metastatic disease must undergo a biopsy to confirm the presence of metastatic tumor if all metastases are \< 1 cm in maximal diameter (except in cases where the study radiologist reviews the imaging and indicated that a biopsy is not needed to confirm that the patient has metastatic disease) * Lansky performance status (PS) 50-100% (for patients ≤ 16 years of age) OR Karnofsky PS 50-100% (for patients \> 16 years of age) * Life expectancy ≥ 3 months * Absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1,000/mm³\* * Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mm³\* * Creatinine clearance or radioisotope glomerular filtration rate ≥ 70 mL/min (≥ 40 mL/min for infants \< 1 year of age)\* or serum creatinine based on age and/or gender as follows: * 0.4 mg/dL (1 month to \< 6 months of age) * 0.5 mg/dL (6 months to \< 1 year of age) * 0.6 mg/dL (1 year to \< 2 years of age) * 0.8 mg/dL (2 years to \< 6 years of age) * 1.0 mg/dL (6 years to \< 10 years of age) * 1.2 mg/dL (10 years to \< 13 years of age) * 1.5 mg/dL (male) or 1.4 mg/dL (female) (13 years to \< 16 years of age) * 1.7 mg/dL (male) or 1.4 mg/dL (female) (≥ 16 years of age) * Patients with urinary tract obstruction by tumor must meet the renal function criteria listed above AND must have unimpeded urinary flow established via decompression of the obstructed portion of the urinary tract * Bilirubin ≤ 1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN)\* * Shortening fraction ≥ 27% by echocardiogram\* OR ejection fraction ≥ 50% by radionuclide angiogram\* * Not pregnant or nursing (patients undergoing radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy) * No nursing for ≥ 1 month after completion of study treatment in study regimens C or D * Fertile patients must use effective contraception during and for ≥ 1 month after completion of study treatment * Negative pregnancy test * No evidence of dyspnea at rest\* * No exercise intolerance\* * Resting pulse oximetry reading \> 94% on room air (for patients with respiratory symptoms)\* * Prior treatment for cancer allowed provided the patient meet the prior therapy requirements * No prior anthracycline (e.g., doxorubicin or daunorubicin) or ifosfamide chemotherapy for patients enrolled on arm C or arm D * No prior radiotherapy to tumor-involved sites

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Probability for Event Free Survival.5 yearsProbability of no relapse, secondary malignancy or death after 5 years since enrollment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Toxicity Rate13 weeksPercentage of Arm D patients experiencing grade 4+ adverse events.
Complete or Partial Response Rate13 weeksTumor response by imaging. Complete Response (CR): Complete disappearance of the tumor. Partial Response (PR): At least 64% decrease in volume compared to the measurement obtained at study enrollment. Overall Response (OR)=CR+PR.
Event Free Survival Probability Disease Extent5 yearsProbability of no relapse, secondary malignancy or death after 5 years since enrollment.
Event Free Survival Probability Histologic Grade5 yearsProbability of no relapse, secondary malignancy or death after 5 years since enrollment
Overall Survival Probability Disease Extent5 yearsProbability of survival after 5 years since enrollment.
Percent Tumor Necrosis13 weeksPercent tumor necrosis by pathology review.
Incidence of Distant MetastasisUp to 10 yearsPercent of patients who had distant metastasis.
Genetic and Gene Expression ProfilesAt diagnosisThe tumors from patients registered on D9902 will be analyzed for genetic and gene expression profiles. The study will prospectively evaluate each tumor and confirm newly defined sarcoma diagnostic criteria based on cancer signatures in NRSTS.
Degree of Agreement in Histologic Grade Determined by the Enrolling Institution Versus by Central Pathology ReviewersAt DiagnosisHistologic grades were determined by the central pathology reviewers and institutional pathologists based on published standards. A higher grade is associated with a more severe disease.
Degree of Agreement in Histologic Grade Between Pediatric Oncology Group (POG) and Fédération Nationale Des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer (FNCLCC) Pathologic Grading SystemsAt diagnosisPOG and FNCLCC grades were determined by pathologists based on published standards. A higher grade is associated with a more severe disease.
Overall Survival Probability Extent of Resection of the Primary Tumor5 yearsProbability of survival after 5 years since enrollment.

Countries

Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Puerto Rico, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm A: No Adjuvant Treatment
Patients with low-grade tumor with either negative or positive microscopic margins or high-grade tumor ≤ 5 cm (in maximum diameter) with negative microscopic margins are assigned to arm A: (observation only). clinical observation: Patients undergo observation therapeutic conventional surgery: Patients undergo surgery
222
Arm B: Low Risk; Adjuvant Radiotherapy
Patients with high-grade tumor ≤ 5 cm (in maximum diameter) with positive microscopic margins are assigned to arm B: (adjuvant radiotherapy). Beginning between 6-42 days after surgical resection, patients undergo a total of 31 fractions of adjuvant radiotherapy. clinical observation: Patients undergo observation therapeutic conventional surgery: Patients undergo surgery 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy: Patients undergo radiotherapy
21
Arm C: Intermediate & High Risk; Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy
High risk \[metastatic, resected, incompletely resected, or unresected disease\] patients with high-grade, grossly resected primary tumor, with metastases are assigned to receive arm C: (adjuvant chemoradiotherapy). Patients receive ifosfamide IV; doxorubicin hydrochloride IV; beginning in week 4, patients also undergo a total of 31 fractions of radiotherapy. doxorubicin hydrochloride: Given IV clinical observation: Patients undergo observation 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy: Patients undergo radiotherapy ifosfamide: Given IV
122
Arm D: Intermediate & High Risk; Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy
High risk \[metastatic, resected, incompletely resected, or unresected disease\] patients with unresected, high-grade metastatic tumor are assigned to receive treatment as in arm D: (neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy): Patients receive ifosfamide IV; doxorubicin hydrochloride IV. Beginning in week 4, patients also undergo a total of 31 fractions of radiotherapy. Patients undergo surgical resection in week 13. doxorubicin hydrochloride: Given IV clinical observation: Patients undergo observation therapeutic conventional surgery: Patients undergo surgery 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy: Patients undergo radiotherapy ifosfamide: Given IV
223
Total588

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event0001
Overall StudyInability to start week 16 tx on time00011
Overall StudyIneligible112223
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy01725
Overall StudyPhysician Decision01227
Overall StudyProtocol Violation62104
Overall StudyRefusal of further protocol therapy01315
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject0020

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm A: No Adjuvant TreatmentArm B: Low Risk; Adjuvant RadiotherapyArm C: Intermediate & High Risk; Adjuvant ChemoradiotherapyArm D: Intermediate & High Risk; Neoadjuvant ChemoradiotherapyTotal
Age, Continuous138.87 Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 60.88
142.58 Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 59.46
155.14 Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 69.2
171.31 Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 68.9
154.68 Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 67.1
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
29 Participants1 Participants22 Participants38 Participants90 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
185 Participants19 Participants95 Participants178 Participants477 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
8 Participants1 Participants5 Participants7 Participants21 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
7 Participants1 Participants2 Participants8 Participants18 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
23 Participants2 Participants21 Participants43 Participants89 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
22 Participants2 Participants7 Participants31 Participants62 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
169 Participants16 Participants90 Participants137 Participants412 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
124 Participants9 Participants60 Participants120 Participants313 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
98 Participants12 Participants62 Participants103 Participants275 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 2050 / 172 / 1107 / 196
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 2051 / 171 / 1103 / 196

Outcome results

Primary

Probability for Event Free Survival.

Probability of no relapse, secondary malignancy or death after 5 years since enrollment.

Time frame: 5 years

Population: Ineligible patients are excluded as well as patients who were treated on the incorrect arm.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm A: No Adjuvant TreatmentProbability for Event Free Survival.0.8984 Probability of EFS at 5 years
Arm B: Low Risk; Adjuvant RadiotherapyProbability for Event Free Survival.0.7647 Probability of EFS at 5 years
Arm C: Intermediate & High Risk; Adjuvant ChemoradiotherapyProbability for Event Free Survival.0.6079 Probability of EFS at 5 years
Arm D: Intermediate & High Risk; Neoadjuvant ChemoradiotherapyProbability for Event Free Survival.0.4873 Probability of EFS at 5 years
Secondary

Complete or Partial Response Rate

Tumor response by imaging. Complete Response (CR): Complete disappearance of the tumor. Partial Response (PR): At least 64% decrease in volume compared to the measurement obtained at study enrollment. Overall Response (OR)=CR+PR.

Time frame: 13 weeks

Population: Only Arm D patients were evaluated for imaging response at week 13 after surgery. Ineligible and inevaluable Arm D patients were excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm A: No Adjuvant TreatmentComplete or Partial Response Rate33.1 percentage of patients
Secondary

Degree of Agreement in Histologic Grade Between Pediatric Oncology Group (POG) and Fédération Nationale Des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer (FNCLCC) Pathologic Grading Systems

POG and FNCLCC grades were determined by pathologists based on published standards. A higher grade is associated with a more severe disease.

Time frame: At diagnosis

Population: Ineligible patients, as well as patients without histologic grade determined by POG or FNCLCC were excluded. The OM evaluates the degree of agreement of two pathology grading systems applied at diagnosis. The time frame At diagnosis reflects the OM.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arm A: No Adjuvant TreatmentDegree of Agreement in Histologic Grade Between Pediatric Oncology Group (POG) and Fédération Nationale Des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer (FNCLCC) Pathologic Grading SystemsHistologic grade 2 by POG24 Participants
Arm A: No Adjuvant TreatmentDegree of Agreement in Histologic Grade Between Pediatric Oncology Group (POG) and Fédération Nationale Des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer (FNCLCC) Pathologic Grading SystemsHistologic grade 1 by POG46 Participants
Arm A: No Adjuvant TreatmentDegree of Agreement in Histologic Grade Between Pediatric Oncology Group (POG) and Fédération Nationale Des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer (FNCLCC) Pathologic Grading SystemsHistologic grade 3 by POG9 Participants
Arm B: Low Risk; Adjuvant RadiotherapyDegree of Agreement in Histologic Grade Between Pediatric Oncology Group (POG) and Fédération Nationale Des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer (FNCLCC) Pathologic Grading SystemsHistologic grade 2 by POG69 Participants
Arm B: Low Risk; Adjuvant RadiotherapyDegree of Agreement in Histologic Grade Between Pediatric Oncology Group (POG) and Fédération Nationale Des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer (FNCLCC) Pathologic Grading SystemsHistologic grade 1 by POG8 Participants
Arm B: Low Risk; Adjuvant RadiotherapyDegree of Agreement in Histologic Grade Between Pediatric Oncology Group (POG) and Fédération Nationale Des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer (FNCLCC) Pathologic Grading SystemsHistologic grade 3 by POG145 Participants
Arm C: Intermediate & High Risk; Adjuvant ChemoradiotherapyDegree of Agreement in Histologic Grade Between Pediatric Oncology Group (POG) and Fédération Nationale Des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer (FNCLCC) Pathologic Grading SystemsHistologic grade 1 by POG1 Participants
Arm C: Intermediate & High Risk; Adjuvant ChemoradiotherapyDegree of Agreement in Histologic Grade Between Pediatric Oncology Group (POG) and Fédération Nationale Des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer (FNCLCC) Pathologic Grading SystemsHistologic grade 3 by POG240 Participants
Arm C: Intermediate & High Risk; Adjuvant ChemoradiotherapyDegree of Agreement in Histologic Grade Between Pediatric Oncology Group (POG) and Fédération Nationale Des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer (FNCLCC) Pathologic Grading SystemsHistologic grade 2 by POG0 Participants
Comparison: Kappa statistic and its 95% confidence interval are used to assess agreement beyond random.95% CI: [0.36, 0.48]
Secondary

Degree of Agreement in Histologic Grade Determined by the Enrolling Institution Versus by Central Pathology Reviewers

Histologic grades were determined by the central pathology reviewers and institutional pathologists based on published standards. A higher grade is associated with a more severe disease.

Time frame: At Diagnosis

Population: Ineligible patients, as well as patients without histologic grade determined by enrolling institution or central pathology reviewers were excluded. The OM evaluates the degree of agreement of two pathology grading reviews at diagnosis. The time frame At diagnosis reflects the OM.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Arm A: No Adjuvant TreatmentDegree of Agreement in Histologic Grade Determined by the Enrolling Institution Versus by Central Pathology ReviewersHistologic grade 2 by central pathology reviewers4 Participants
Arm A: No Adjuvant TreatmentDegree of Agreement in Histologic Grade Determined by the Enrolling Institution Versus by Central Pathology ReviewersHistologic grade 1 by central pathology reviewers38 Participants
Arm A: No Adjuvant TreatmentDegree of Agreement in Histologic Grade Determined by the Enrolling Institution Versus by Central Pathology ReviewersHistologic grade 3 by central pathology reviewers3 Participants
Arm B: Low Risk; Adjuvant RadiotherapyDegree of Agreement in Histologic Grade Determined by the Enrolling Institution Versus by Central Pathology ReviewersHistologic grade 2 by central pathology reviewers56 Participants
Arm B: Low Risk; Adjuvant RadiotherapyDegree of Agreement in Histologic Grade Determined by the Enrolling Institution Versus by Central Pathology ReviewersHistologic grade 1 by central pathology reviewers5 Participants
Arm B: Low Risk; Adjuvant RadiotherapyDegree of Agreement in Histologic Grade Determined by the Enrolling Institution Versus by Central Pathology ReviewersHistologic grade 3 by central pathology reviewers10 Participants
Arm C: Intermediate & High Risk; Adjuvant ChemoradiotherapyDegree of Agreement in Histologic Grade Determined by the Enrolling Institution Versus by Central Pathology ReviewersHistologic grade 1 by central pathology reviewers1 Participants
Arm C: Intermediate & High Risk; Adjuvant ChemoradiotherapyDegree of Agreement in Histologic Grade Determined by the Enrolling Institution Versus by Central Pathology ReviewersHistologic grade 3 by central pathology reviewers268 Participants
Arm C: Intermediate & High Risk; Adjuvant ChemoradiotherapyDegree of Agreement in Histologic Grade Determined by the Enrolling Institution Versus by Central Pathology ReviewersHistologic grade 2 by central pathology reviewers9 Participants
Comparison: Kappa statistic and its 95% confidence interval are used to assess agreement beyond random.95% CI: [0.76, 0.88]
Secondary

Event Free Survival Probability Disease Extent

Probability of no relapse, secondary malignancy or death after 5 years since enrollment.

Time frame: 5 years

Population: 94 participants were excluded because of ineligibility, incorrect treatment, or absence of evaluation for tumor invasiveness and histologic grade.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm A: No Adjuvant TreatmentEvent Free Survival Probability Disease Extent0.7758 Probability
Arm B: Low Risk; Adjuvant RadiotherapyEvent Free Survival Probability Disease Extent0.1960 Probability
Comparison: The Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate prognostic impact of disease extent (non-metastatic; metastatic) after accounting for the effects of site of the primary tumor (body wall; extremity; head/neck; visceral), tumor size (\<=5cm; \>5cm), tumor depth (deep; superficial), tumor invasiveness (invasive; non-invasive), extent of resection of the primary tumor (less than total resection; margin -; margin +), and histologic (POG) grade.p-value: <0.0001Regression, Cox
Secondary

Event Free Survival Probability Histologic Grade

Probability of no relapse, secondary malignancy or death after 5 years since enrollment

Time frame: 5 years

Population: 94 participants were excluded because of ineligibility, incorrect treatment, or absence of evaluation for tumor invasiveness and histologic grade.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm A: No Adjuvant TreatmentEvent Free Survival Probability Histologic Grade0.9636 Probability
Arm B: Low Risk; Adjuvant RadiotherapyEvent Free Survival Probability Histologic Grade0.8505 Probability
Arm C: Intermediate & High Risk; Adjuvant ChemoradiotherapyEvent Free Survival Probability Histologic Grade0.6136 Probability
Comparison: The Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate prognostic impact of histologic (POG) grade after accounting for the effects of disease extent (non-metastatic; metastatic), site of the primary tumor (body wall; extremity; head/neck; visceral), tumor size (\<=5cm; \>5cm), tumor depth (deep; superficial), tumor invasiveness (invasive; non-invasive), and extent of resection of the primary tumor (less than total resection; margin -; margin +) .p-value: 0.0049Regression, Cox
Secondary

Genetic and Gene Expression Profiles

The tumors from patients registered on D9902 will be analyzed for genetic and gene expression profiles. The study will prospectively evaluate each tumor and confirm newly defined sarcoma diagnostic criteria based on cancer signatures in NRSTS.

Time frame: At diagnosis

Population: None of the tumors were analyzed for genetic and gene expression profiles. The analysis will not be completed. The time frame At diagnosis is the time frame for the gene expression profiles.

Secondary

Incidence of Distant Metastasis

Percent of patients who had distant metastasis.

Time frame: Up to 10 years

Population: 94 participants were excluded because of ineligibility, incorrect treatment, or absence of evaluation for tumor invasiveness and histologic grade.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm A: No Adjuvant TreatmentIncidence of Distant Metastasis10.59 Percentage of participants
Arm B: Low Risk; Adjuvant RadiotherapyIncidence of Distant Metastasis60.87 Percentage of participants
Comparison: The logistic regression model was used to evaluate prognostic impact of disease extent (non-metastatic; metastatic) after accounting for the effects of site of the primary tumor (body wall; extremity; head/neck; visceral), tumor size (\<=5cm; \>5cm), tumor depth (deep; superficial), tumor invasiveness (invasive; non-invasive), extent of resection of the primary tumor (less than total resection; margin -; margin +), and histologic (POG) grade.p-value: <0.0001Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Incidence of Distant Metastasis

Percent of patients who had distant metastasis.

Time frame: Up to 10 years

Population: 94 participants were excluded because of ineligibility, incorrect treatment, or absence of evaluation for tumor invasiveness and histologic grade.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm A: No Adjuvant TreatmentIncidence of Distant Metastasis0.00 Percentage of participants
Arm B: Low Risk; Adjuvant RadiotherapyIncidence of Distant Metastasis5.06 Percentage of participants
Arm C: Intermediate & High Risk; Adjuvant ChemoradiotherapyIncidence of Distant Metastasis23.38 Percentage of participants
Comparison: The logistic regression model was used to evaluate prognostic impact of histologic (POG) grade after accounting for the effects of disease extent (non-metastatic; metastatic), site of the primary tumor (body wall; extremity; head/neck; visceral), tumor size (\<=5cm; \>5cm), tumor depth (deep; superficial), tumor invasiveness (invasive; non-invasive), and extent of resection of the primary tumor (less than total resection; margin -; margin +) .p-value: 0.0228Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Overall Survival Probability Disease Extent

Probability of survival after 5 years since enrollment.

Time frame: 5 years

Population: 94 participants were excluded because of ineligibility, incorrect treatment, or absence of evaluation for tumor invasiveness and histologic grade.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm A: No Adjuvant TreatmentOverall Survival Probability Disease Extent0.8752 Probability
Arm B: Low Risk; Adjuvant RadiotherapyOverall Survival Probability Disease Extent0.3153 Probability
Comparison: The Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate prognostic impact of disease extent (non-metastatic; metastatic) after accounting for the effects of site of the primary tumor (body wall; extremity; head/neck; visceral), tumor size (\<=5cm; \>5cm), tumor depth (deep; superficial), tumor invasiveness (invasive; non-invasive), extent of resection of the primary tumor (less than total resection; margin -; margin +), and histologic (POG) grade.p-value: <0.0001Regression, Cox
Secondary

Overall Survival Probability Extent of Resection of the Primary Tumor

Probability of survival after 5 years since enrollment.

Time frame: 5 years

Population: 94 participants were excluded because of ineligibility, incorrect treatment, or absence of evaluation for tumor invasiveness and histologic grade.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm A: No Adjuvant TreatmentOverall Survival Probability Extent of Resection of the Primary Tumor0.5975 Probability
Arm B: Low Risk; Adjuvant RadiotherapyOverall Survival Probability Extent of Resection of the Primary Tumor0.9353 Probability
Arm C: Intermediate & High Risk; Adjuvant ChemoradiotherapyOverall Survival Probability Extent of Resection of the Primary Tumor0.7764 Probability
Comparison: The Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate prognostic impact of the resection extent of the primary tumor (less than total resection; margin -; margin +) after accounting for the effects of site of the primary tumor (body wall; extremity; head/neck; visceral), disease extent (non-metastatic; metastatic), tumor size (\<=5cm; \>5cm), tumor depth (deep; superficial), tumor invasiveness (invasive; non-invasive), and histologic (POG) grade.p-value: 0.0096Regression, Cox
Secondary

Percent Tumor Necrosis

Percent tumor necrosis by pathology review.

Time frame: 13 weeks

Population: Only Arm D patients were evaluated at week 13 for percent tumor necrosis. Ineligible and inevaluable Arm D patients were excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm A: No Adjuvant TreatmentPercent Tumor Necrosis59.4 percentage of tumor necrosisStandard Deviation 38.5
Secondary

Toxicity Rate

Percentage of Arm D patients experiencing grade 4+ adverse events.

Time frame: 13 weeks

Population: Excluding ineligible patients and patients not treated based on the protocol.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm A: No Adjuvant TreatmentToxicity Rate3.06 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026