Skip to content

Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant Compared to Sham Injection in Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema

A Randomized, Double-Masked, Parallel Group, Multi-center, Dose-Finding Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of ASI-001A 0.5 μg/Day and ASI-001B 0.2 μg/Day Fluocinolone Acetonide Intravitreal Inserts to Sham Injection in Subjects With Diabetic Macular Edema

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00344968
Acronym
FAME
Enrollment
956
Registered
2006-06-27
Start date
2007-09-30
Completion date
2010-12-31
Last updated
2014-05-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetic Macular Edema

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of an intravitreal insert of fluocinolone acetonide for the treatment of diabetic macular edema.

Interventions

0.5 mg fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal insert

0.2 mg fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal insert

Laser photocoagulation

Sponsors

Alimera Sciences
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age \>= 18 years with diabetic macular edema * Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus types 1 or 2 * Best corrected visual acuity of 19-68 letters * Retinal thickness \> 250 micron by OCT * Investigator is comfortable deferring macular laser treatment for 6 weeks

Exclusion criteria

* Glaucoma, ocular hypertension, IOP \>21 mmHg or concurrent therapy at screening with IOP lowering agents * Retinal or choroidal neovascularization due to ocular conditions other than diabetic retinopathy * Prior intravitreal, subtenon, or periocular steroid therapy within 6 months * Any ocular surgery within the last 3 months * Retinal laser treatment within the last 3 months * History of uncontrolled IOP elevation with steroid use that did not respond to topical therapy * Any lens opacity which impairs visualization of the posterior pole

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Acuity36 monthsThe percentage of subjects with an increase from baseline of 15 or more letters in best corrected visual acuity letter score as assessed by ETDRS eye chart (study eye).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Retinal Thickness36 monthsRetinal images where sent to a reading center for analysis. Some images were not clear/distorted and could not be properly analyzed. This accounts for the discrepancy in the number of participants analyzed.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Sham Comparator
Procedure: Standard of care laser photocoagulation
185
0.2 ug/Day Implant
Dose 0.2 ug/day Medidur Implant
376
0.5 ug/Day Implant
Dose 0.5 ug/day Medidur implant
395
Total956

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event5415
Overall StudyDeath112731
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up243737
Overall StudyOther010
Overall StudyProtocol Violation225
Overall StudyUnsatisfactory Therapeutic Effect301
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject143127

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic0.2 ug/Day Implant0.5 ug/Day ImplantSham ComparatorTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
162 participants161 participants66 participants389 participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
213 participants232 participants119 participants564 participants
Age, Continuous63.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3
62.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3
61.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
62.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4
Gender
Female
160 participants150 participants77 participants387 participants
Gender
Male
215 participants243 participants108 participants566 participants
Region of Enrollment
Europe
37 participants39 participants17 participants93 participants
Region of Enrollment
India
80 participants82 participants39 participants201 participants
Region of Enrollment
North America
259 participants274 participants129 participants662 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
174 / 185360 / 375388 / 393
serious
Total, serious adverse events
112 / 185292 / 375331 / 393

Outcome results

Primary

Visual Acuity

The percentage of subjects with an increase from baseline of 15 or more letters in best corrected visual acuity letter score as assessed by ETDRS eye chart (study eye).

Time frame: 36 months

Population: Three subjects were randomized but did not receive treatment. These subjects were not included in the safety analysis, which accounts for the discrepancy in the overall number of participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)Dispersion
Sham ComparatorVisual Acuity18.9 percentage of subjects 18.01
Fluocinolone Acetonide: 0.2 ug/Day ImplantVisual Acuity28.7 percentage of subjects 19.04
Fluocinolone Acetonide: 0.5 ug/Day ImplantVisual Acuity27.8 percentage of subjects 18.96
Secondary

Retinal Thickness

Retinal images where sent to a reading center for analysis. Some images were not clear/distorted and could not be properly analyzed. This accounts for the discrepancy in the number of participants analyzed.

Time frame: 36 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sham ComparatorRetinal Thickness146.1 micronsStandard Deviation 192.1
Fluocinolone Acetonide: 0.2 ug/Day ImplantRetinal Thickness113.5 micronsStandard Deviation 151.46
Fluocinolone Acetonide: 0.5 ug/Day ImplantRetinal Thickness131.8 micronsStandard Deviation 162.46

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 22, 2026