Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety Study of Nasacort in Chronic Non Allergic and Non Infectious Rhinitis in Adults

A Randomised, Double-blind, French Multi-centre Study, to Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerance, in Comparison With Placebo, of Nasacort in Chronic Non Allergic and Non Infectious Rhinitis in Adults

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00344942
Acronym
RhiCNANI
Enrollment
77
Registered
2006-06-27
Start date
2006-04-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2009-12-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rhinitis

Brief summary

To demonstrate the superiority of the clinical efficacy of 12 weeks' treatment with Nasacort versus placebo in adult patients presenting with Chronic Non Allergic and Non Infectious Rhinitis

Interventions

DRUGtriamcinolone acetonide

220µg/day or a double spray into each nostril once daily for 12 weeks'treatment

DRUGplacebo

a double spray into each nostril once daily

Sponsors

Sanofi
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patient presenting with Chronic Non Allergic and Non Infectious Rhinitis capable of benefiting from corticosteroid therapy administered via the nasal route. * patient with chronic rhinitis of minimum duration 12 weeks, whether or not consecutive, per year. * patient with Non Allergic Rhinitis confirmed by negative phadiatop test. * patient presenting a mean global score for the 5 symptoms \>= 5 (nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, disturbance of sense of smell, sneezing, facial heaviness), or mean score for the 3 main symptoms (nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, disturbance of sense of smell) \>= 5 (mean for 7 days prior to visit V0). * patient presenting an inflammation score at anterior rhinoscopy or nasal endoscopy \>= 4.

Exclusion criteria

* patient presenting a nasal polyp * patient presenting a severe septal deviation which would interfere with insertion of the nasal spray * patient presenting a nasal cavity tumor * patient presenting a sinus infection * patient presenting a history of endonasal surgery * patient presenting a chronic rhinitis of extrinsic origin (drug-related or food-related rhinitis) or intrinsic origin (hormonal rhinitis, positional rhinitis,atrophic rhinitis, ...) * patient on a program of intensive sports training * patient presenting with : cystic fibrosis, pulmonary mycosis, necrotising vascularitis, immotile cilia syndrome, .... * patient presenting with known immunosuppression, lymphoma * patient presenting with a known cardiovascular, neurological or other medically significant illness * patient presenting with known renal failure, with known glaucoma, with known drug addiction * current antibiotic therapy * corticosteroids administered in the two months prior to admission * patient presenting problems of haemostasis (epistaxis), ophthalmic and/or oro-bucco-nasal herpetic infection. The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a patient's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Mean global score obtained on the basis of 5 evaluations : nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, disturbed sense of smell, sneezing, facial heaviness.7 days prior to each visit

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
list of undesirable eventsduring the treatment period

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026