Skip to content

Memantine Augmentation of Antidepressants

A Randomized Double-Blind Pilot Study of Memantine Augmentation in Antidepressant Nonresponders or Incomplete Responders

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00344682
Enrollment
31
Registered
2006-06-27
Start date
2006-06-30
Completion date
2011-12-31
Last updated
2018-07-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Depressive Disorder

Keywords

memantine, Namenda, augmentation, add-on, depression, MDD (major depressive disorder), unipolar depression, NMDA, ketamine, uncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist

Brief summary

This study is evaluating the efficacy and safety of the drug memantine (trade name NAMENDA) as an augmentation agent for the treatment of depression in people who are not fully responding to antidepressant medications.

Detailed description

\- Objective The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 20 mg of memantine administered once daily as an augmentation agent for subjects who have been taking antidepressants for at least 1 month but who have experienced an incomplete or absent therapeutic response. \- Background Memantine is a moderate affinity, uncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist that is approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe dementia of the Alzheimer's type. It has been commercially available in 23 countries worldwide since 1982. There are reports in the published literature that suggest NMDA receptors may be involved in the etiology of depressive disorders. The NMDA antagonist ketamine has been shown to have antidepressant effects in a placebo-controlled clinical trial (Berman et al., 2000). Uncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonists, including memantine, have been shown to exhibit antidepressant-like activity in animal models of depression (Moryl et al., 1993, Papp and Moryl 1994). Animal studies also support the possibility that uncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonists may work synergistically in combination with antidepressants in animal models of depression (Rogoz et al., 2001). Some authors have hypothesized a role for NMDA receptors in the therapeutic effects of numerous antidepressants (Skolnick et al., 1996). \- Study Design and Duration This is a randomized, single site, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study in outpatients. The study consists of an 8-week double-blind treatment period. Approximately 25 patients will be randomized to each treatment group (memantine or placebo) for a total of approximately 50 patients.

Interventions

DRUGmemantine

memantine 5mg - 20mg PO daily

DRUGPlacebo

5mg - 20mg PO daily over 8 weeks

Sponsors

Forest Laboratories
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Massachusetts, Worcester
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female patients between 18 and 85 years of age at screening. * Patients must provide written informed consent prior to study entry. * Patients must meet DSM-IV-TR (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual IV Text Revision) criteria for Major Depressive Episode of a severity mild, moderate or severe or in partial remission, as confirmed by the MINI. * Patients must have a HAM-D (17-item) score of 16 or higher. * Patients must have been on 1 of the following medications for 4 or more weeks at or above the listed dose with no psychiatric medication dose changes for the past 25 days: * 20 mg qD of fluoxetine (Once Daily) * 50 mg qD of sertraline * 20 mg qD of paroxetine * 200 mg qD of fluvoxamine * 20 mg qD of citalopram * 10 mg qD of escitalopram * 150 mg qD of venlafaxine or venlafaxine sustained release * 300 mg qD of bupropion or bupropion sustained or extended release * 15 mg qD of mirtazapine * 60 mg qD of duloxetine * Participants must agree to keep the dose of their existing antidepressant(s) constant throughout the 8-week trial.

Exclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of bipolar disorder or schizophrenic or schizoaffective disorder. * History of alcohol or drug abuse or dependence within 6 months of enrollment. * Patients who have received ECT (Electroconvulsive Therapy) in the past 3 months. * History of seizures. * Moderate dementia (MMSE score of 20 or less). * Active suicidal ideation: endorsing a 3 (most severe score) on QIDS-SR (Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomatology Self Reports) suicide item OR a score of 2 or higher for the past week on Suicide Scale items 4 or 5 (current suicidal ideation moderate or strong or would avoid taking steps to save life). * Currently taking a mood stabilizer or antipsychotic (except lithium clearly used as an augmenting agent). * Patients who, in the opinion of the investigator, might not be suitable for the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Score (MADRS)Baseline & week 8Higher MADRS score indicates more severe depression, and each item yields a score of 0 to 6. The overall score ranges from 0 to 60. Scores 0 to 6 indicate symptoms absent; 7 to 19 indicates mild depression; 30 to 34 defines moderate; 35 to 60 indicates severe depression. Changes in MADRS score was a primary measure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Modified Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms Self Report Scale (QIDS-SR)baseline & week 8The 16 item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR16) (Rush et al. 2003) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms, with higher scores representing more severe forms of depression. When complete, the QIDS are scored by summing responses to obtain a total score ranging from 0 to 27. Either appetite increase or decrease, but not both, are used to calculate the total score. Weight increase or decrease, but not both, are used to calculate the total score. Scores 0-5 indicate no severity of depression; 6-10 is mild; 11-15 is moderate; 16-20 is severe; 21-27 is very severe levels of depression. Participants were evaluated at baseline and at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 & 8.
Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS)baseline & week 8Each item is scored on a scale of 0 (not present) to 4 (severe), with a total score range of 0-56, where \<17 indicates mild severity, 18-24 mild to moderate severity and 25-30 moderate to severe. Scores \> 30 indicate severe anxiety.
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Score (MADRS)baseline and week 8Higher MADRS score indicates more severe depression, and each item yields a score of 0 to 6 on 10 items. The overall score ranges from 0 to 60. Scores 0 to 6 indicate symptoms absent; 7 to 19 indicates mild depression; 30 to 34 defines moderate; 35 to 60 indicates severe depression. Changes in response rate and remission rate were assessed for secondary measures.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Study participants were recruited through clinician referral and posted and radio advertising with the majority of patients recruited through clinician referral within our single-site, tertiary-care medical center.

Pre-assignment details

Participants continued on their previously prescribed antidepressant at the same dose throughout the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Placebo comparator : 5mg - 20mg PO daily over 8 weeks
16
Memantine
memantine : memantine 5mg - 20mg PO daily
15
Total31

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMemantinePlaceboTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
13 Participants15 Participants28 Participants
Age, Continuous54.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.17
49.75 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.68
52.28 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
Region of Enrollment
United States
15 participants16 participants31 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants11 Participants19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants5 Participants12 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 163 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 161 / 15

Outcome results

Primary

Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Score (MADRS)

Higher MADRS score indicates more severe depression, and each item yields a score of 0 to 6. The overall score ranges from 0 to 60. Scores 0 to 6 indicate symptoms absent; 7 to 19 indicates mild depression; 30 to 34 defines moderate; 35 to 60 indicates severe depression. Changes in MADRS score was a primary measure.

Time frame: Baseline & week 8

Population: The primary outcome examines a mean change in MADRS scores at baseline \& week 8 through last observation carried forward (LOCF); no values were imputed for missing assessments. The primary data analysis used intent-to-treat measures and computes final study score minus baseline averaged among participants to evaluate treatment group differences.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboMontgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Score (MADRS)-7.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.14
MemantineMontgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Score (MADRS)-7.13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.61
Secondary

Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS)

Each item is scored on a scale of 0 (not present) to 4 (severe), with a total score range of 0-56, where \<17 indicates mild severity, 18-24 mild to moderate severity and 25-30 moderate to severe. Scores \> 30 indicate severe anxiety.

Time frame: baseline & week 8

Population: Secondary outcome examines a change in mean HARS scores observed at baseline \& week 8 through last observed data carried forward (LOCF);no values were imputed for missing assessments.Efficacy data analysis used intent-to-treat measures \& computes final study score minus baseline averaged among participants to evaluate treatment group differences

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboHamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS)-4.13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.11
MemantineHamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS)-5.53 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.29
Secondary

Modified Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms Self Report Scale (QIDS-SR)

The 16 item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR16) (Rush et al. 2003) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms, with higher scores representing more severe forms of depression. When complete, the QIDS are scored by summing responses to obtain a total score ranging from 0 to 27. Either appetite increase or decrease, but not both, are used to calculate the total score. Weight increase or decrease, but not both, are used to calculate the total score. Scores 0-5 indicate no severity of depression; 6-10 is mild; 11-15 is moderate; 16-20 is severe; 21-27 is very severe levels of depression. Participants were evaluated at baseline and at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 & 8.

Time frame: baseline & week 8

Population: The secondary outcome examines a change over in mean QID-SR scores at baseline \& week 8 through last observed data carried forward (LOCF); no values were imputed for missing assessments. Data analysis used intent-to-treat measures and computes final study score minus baseline averaged among participants to evaluate treatment group differences.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboModified Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms Self Report Scale (QIDS-SR)-3.69 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5
MemantineModified Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms Self Report Scale (QIDS-SR)-6.47 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.25
Secondary

Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Score (MADRS)

Higher MADRS score indicates more severe depression, and each item yields a score of 0 to 6 on 10 items. The overall score ranges from 0 to 60. Scores 0 to 6 indicate symptoms absent; 7 to 19 indicates mild depression; 30 to 34 defines moderate; 35 to 60 indicates severe depression. Changes in response rate and remission rate were assessed for secondary measures.

Time frame: baseline and week 8

Population: Secondary outcome examines a change in response rates,when 50% change from baseline, \& remission rates, when MADRS scores of 12 or less were observed.Fischer exact tests assessed efficiency in each treatment group. Intent-to-treat rates at baseline minus week 8 through last observed data carried forward (LOCF) were used;no data values were imputed

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboMontgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Score (MADRS)-10.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.46
MemantineMontgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Score (MADRS)-7.13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.11

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 10, 2026