Skip to content

Rituximab as Second Line Treatment for ITP

Rituximab as Second Line Treatment for ITP; A Multicenter, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase III Study. The RITP Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00344149
Enrollment
112
Registered
2006-06-26
Start date
2006-06-30
Completion date
2014-03-31
Last updated
2014-03-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP)

Keywords

Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura, Rituximab, Splenectomy, Response, Treatment, treatment of Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura

Brief summary

Immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) is an autoimmune disorder characterized thrombocytopenia. Splenectomy is the standard treatment for patients who fails the first-line treatment: corticosteroid. Rituximab, has recently emerged as a promising treatment for ITP. The aim of the study is to determine whether early treatment with Rituximab can result in durable remissions, and consequently, lead to the avoidance of splenectomy in a significant number of patients.

Detailed description

ITP is an autoimmune disorder characterized by formation of autoantibodies against platelet antigens leading to premature platelet destruction and persistent thrombocytopenia often resulting in bleeding. The goal of treatment is to raise the platelet count to a hemostatically safe level. Treatment with corticosteroids rarely results in durable responses, and most of the patients will ultimately require a second-line treatment. Splenectomy results in a high rate of sustained remissions. However, the procedure is invasive and is associated with considerable short and long term morbidity and mortality. Rituximab, a chimeric anti-CD20 antibody with a B-cell depleting effect, has recently emerged as a promising treatment for ITP. The study aims to determine whether early treatment with Rituximab can result in durable remissions, and consequently, avoidance of splenectomy in a clinical significant number of patients. The main objective of this study is to assess the rate of treatment failure (splenectomy or meeting criteria for splenectomy after week 12) at 1.5-year in a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multi-centre

Interventions

I.V infusion of Rituximab 375 mg/m2 per week for 4 weeks

Sponsors

Oslo University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
South-Eastern Regional Health Authority
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Ostfold Hospital Trust
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. ITP with platelet count \<30 x 109 /l after 2 weeks of treatment with prednisolon or during prednisolon tapering period i.e. from week three of prednisolon initiation. Patients with platelet count between 30 -50 are eligible if a higher platelet count is considered necessary, because of : concomitant medical illness predisposing to bleeding (hypertension, GI bleeding, bleeding diathesis, previous history of bleeding) concomitant medical condition requiring platelet blocking agents/ anticoagulation, persistent bleeding despite platelets \> 30 x 109 /l, prior to surgery, or because of other patient related factors necessitating higher platelet count as occupation, hobby, psychological intolerability. 2. Subject is \>18 years 3. Subject has signed and dated written informed consent. 4. Subject is able to understand and comply with protocol requirements and instructions, and intends to complete the study as planned. 5. Females in fertile age should express willingness for use of contraceptive means for 6 months following the administration of the study drugs.

Exclusion criteria

1. Previous splenectomy, chemotherapy, treatment with anti-D Ig, rituximab, or immune-suppressive treatments other than corticosteroids, Dapsone or Danazol 2. Underlying malignancy or previous history of malignancy in the past 5 years (except skin carcinoma) 3. Pregnancy and lactation 4. Not willing to participate in the study 5. Expected survival of \< 2 years 6. Known intolerance to murine antibodies 7. Females in child-bearing age not willing to use contraception for 6 months 8. HIV-positive/AIDS-, Hepatitis -B virus positive- or Hepatitis -C virus positive 9. Patients with a definite Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) (\> 4 of the American College of Rheumatology Criteria) 10. Patients currently involved in another clinical trial with evaluation of drug treatment 11. Bacterial infections, viral infections, fungal infections, myco-bacterial infections (excluding fungal infections) or other evolutive infections or any other infections episode requiring hospitalisation or treatment with an antibiotics 4 weeks before selection for IV route or within 2 weeks before selection for oral route 12. History of soft tissue, bone or joint infections (fascitis, abscess, osteomyelitis, septic arthritis) during the last year prior to inclusion in the study 13. Medical history of relapsing or chronic severe infectious diseases or any other underlying pathology predisposing to serious infections 14. Known Primary or secondary immune deficiency syndromes 15. Administration of a living vaccine within 4 weeks preceding the inclusion in the study -16- Previous treatment with any lymphocytes depleting medication (e.g.: MabCampath®) 17- Previous treatment with inhibitors of leucocytes transmigration (e.g.: Tysabri®) 18- Known intolerance to human monoclonal antibodies 19- Known severe chronic pulmonary obstructive Disease (FEV \< 50% or functional dyspnoea grade 3) 20- Known congestive heart failure NYHA (New York Heart Association classification of heart failure) class III and IV 21- Recent episode (\<6 months) of acute coronary syndrome.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary endpoint is treatment failure as defined by a composite end point of Splenectomy performed at any time after randomization or Meeting the predefined Criteria for Splenectomy at or after week 12 that is if splenectomy is not performed.1.5 years

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Response rates1.5 years
Relapse rate1.5 years
Mortality rate1.5 years
Complications rate1.5 yearsIncluding bleeding, infections and thromboembolic events

Countries

Norway

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 18, 2026