Skip to content

Randomized Trial Comparing 3 Routes of Delivering Lorazepam to Children.

Buccal, Intranasal or Intravenous Lorazepam for the Treatment of Acute Convulsions in Children in Blantyre, Malawi: a Randomized Trial

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00343096
Enrollment
800
Registered
2006-06-22
Start date
2006-06-30
Completion date
2009-03-31
Last updated
2012-07-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Convulsions, Status Epilepticus

Keywords

intranasal, buccal, lorazepam, paediatric, convulsions

Brief summary

This study aims to address the hypothesis that Lorazepam (an anticonvulsant) is as effective when given via the intranasal or buccal route as the intravenous route in terminating convulsions in children.

Detailed description

Convulsions are common in children. Prompt treatment with an effective anticonvulsant reduces longterm morbidity and mortality. The use of intravenous lorazepam as first line therapy in acute childhood convulsions where venous access has been obtained is widely accepted in developed countries. However, intravenous access can be a problem out of hospital or in small children. Benzodiazepines such as Lorazepam have long been the mainstay of first line therapy for acute convulsions but there is insufficient clinical evidence as to the optimal mode of administration when venous access has failed. Lorazepam can be given via the intranasal and buccal route offering the potential to be as effective as intravenous lorazepam whilst being easier to administer and avoiding the need for intravenous cannulation. To date there are no large published studies that have evaluated the efficacy and safety of intranasal or buccal lorazepam compared to intravenous lorazepam in the treatment of acute convulsions. In this study we wish to address the urgent need to obtain randomized controlled data in treating acute convulsions in children using a drug and delivery system that is safe, effective and easy to use in our setting.

Interventions

DRUGLorazepam

All doses 0.1mg/kg once, repeat after 10 minutes x1

Sponsors

Kamuzu University of Health Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Months to 15 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

children with acute generalized seizures, continuing for a minimum of 5 minutes, who have not received any anti-convulsant therapy within 1 hour of presentation.

Exclusion criteria

Children who have received anticonvulsant treatment within 1 hour prior to assessment. Any child whose seizures cease following correction of hypoglycaemia. Children with a known adverse reaction to lorazepam.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Whether cessation of fit was achieved within ten minutes or not.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Frequency of additional drugs required to terminate presenting seizure
Frequency of cardio-respiratory side effects
Seizure recurrence within 24 hours of terminating the presenting seizure
Time from identification of a fitting child to cessation of fit.
Outcome of patients including any neurological sequelae at hospital discharge.

Countries

Malawi

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026