Skip to content

A Study on Knee Immobilization and Pain Levels After an Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction Surgery

The Effect of Knee Immobilization on Postoperative Pain Following an Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00338663
Enrollment
88
Registered
2006-06-20
Start date
2006-05-31
Completion date
2007-04-30
Last updated
2007-08-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Keywords

anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, knee immobilization, postoperative pain

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to determine if there is difference in immediate postoperative pain levels (48 hours) between patients who wear a knee immobilizer splint compared to patients who do not wear a knee immobilizer splint after an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery.

Detailed description

This study will attempt to evaluate the efficacy of knee immobilization on patient postoperative pain levels following an ACL reconstruction. There is a lack of consensus in the area of postoperative knee bracing/immobilization. A survey of Canadian surgeons indicates that the primary reason for postoperative knee immobilization is to reduce pain. To the investigators' knowledge, there are no studies comparing the use of immediate (0-48 hours) postoperative knee immobilization versus no immobilization and pain control in this patient population.

Interventions

DEVICEknee immobilization splint

Sponsors

LifeMark Health
CollaboratorOTHER
Calgary Orthopaedic Research and Education Fund
CollaboratorOTHER
LifeMark Health Research Group
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

\- Clinical: Patients' aged 18-40, ACL deficiency as determined by MRI or physical exam (positive lachmann and pivot shift tests) resulting in giving way episodes (acute or chronic) unresponsive to non-operative management and therefore requiring primary ACL reconstruction. \- Arthroscopic: Concomitant meniscal resection.

Exclusion criteria

\- Clinical: Previous surgery on either knee (not including a diagnostic arthroscopy arthroscopy or simple partial meniscectomy,) Concomitant lower extremity fracture, Ipsilateral collateral ligament injury within past 3 months, Time from ACL injury less than 6 weeks, Allergy/intolerance to Tylenol 3 with codeine and to Percocet, Third Party or Medical Legal. \- Radiological: Skeletal immaturity (open growth plates). \- Arthroscopic/surgical: Concomitant posterior cruciate ligament or collateral ligament repairs, Osteochondral lesions requiring microfracture, Meniscal repair, Patients not having both their semitendinosus and gracilis harvested.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Patient self-assessed pain levels using an unmarked zero to one hundred mm visual analog scale (VAS) at forty eight hours postoperative.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Patient self-assessed pain levels using an unmarked zero to one hundred mm visual analog scale (VAS) at seven and fourteen days postoperative.
Analgesic type and time taken will be self reported by the patient at each VAS entry.
Range of motion including both flexion and extension will be assessed at fourteen days postoperative by the surgeon.

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026