Skip to content

A Study of Epoetin Alfa Plus Standard Supportive Care Versus Standard Supportive Care Only in Anemic Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer Receiving Standard Chemotherapy

A Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study of Epoetin Alfa Plus Standard Supportive Care Versus Standard Supportive Care in Anemic Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer Receiving Standard Chemotherapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00338286
Enrollment
2098
Registered
2006-06-20
Start date
2006-03-02
Completion date
2017-01-31
Last updated
2018-03-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer, Neoplasm Metastasis

Keywords

anemia, metastatic breast cancer, Hemoglobin, progression-free survival (PFS), erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA)

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the impact on tumor progression as evaluated by progression-free survival (PFS) of epoetin alfa plus standard supportive care as compared with standard supportive care alone (packed red blood cell (RBC) transfusions), for treating anemia according to label guidance in patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving standard chemotherapy.

Detailed description

Anemia is a common complication of the treatment of metastatic breast cancer and is related to the effects of chemotherapy and to chronic disease itself. This is a randomized, open-label, multicenter, international study to further examine the safety of the study drug used with standard supportive care (i.e., packed RBC transfusions) compared to standard supportive care alone, when used to treat anemia associated with chemotherapy. This study will be done in subjects with metastatic breast cancer who are being or will be treated with first-line chemotherapy with standard dose schedules of taxane monotherapy, or a taxane plus trastuzumab, or an anthracycline plus either a taxane or cyclophosphamide. The study hypothesis is that epoetin alfa, when used as supportive anemia care, does not increase the risk of tumor progression or death. The study treatment will be compared to the control treatment by comparing progression-free survival, i.e., the number of months from the date a patient is randomized into the trial to the date of the first documented disease progression or death. In addition to their chemotherapy, half of the subjects will be assigned to receive study drug (epoetin alfa) and half of the subjects will be assigned to standard supportive care for anemia. Subjects treated with the study drug will receive standard supportive care (packed RBC transfusions) plus 40,000 IU epoetin alfa given subcutaneously once a week until 4 weeks after the last cycle of chemotherapy or until disease progression, whichever comes first.The hypothesis is to test that epoetin alfa, when used as supportive anemia care, is non-inferior to control (standard supportive care alone), as measured by progression free survival (PFS). Patients treated with the study drug will receive standard supportive care (packed red blood cells (RBC) transfusions) plus 40,000 IU epoetin alfa given subcutaneously once a week until 4 weeks after the last cycle of chemotherapy or until disease progression, whichever comes first. Dose adjustments (dose escalation, dose reduction, dose interruption, and dose resumption) of epoetin alfa will be based on hemoglobin (Hb) and confirm to prescribing information.

Interventions

OTHERStandard supportive care (packed RBC transfusion)

Per doctor prescription

DRUGepoetin alfa + packed RBC transfusion

40,000 IU SC once a week.

Sponsors

Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histologically confirmed (e.g., slide of tissue) breast cancer * HER2/NEU positive or negative * Clinical evidence of metastasis (e.g., biopsy) with at least 1 measurable metastatic (M1) lesion prior to starting the current chemotherapy * Received 1st and 2nd line chemotherapy * Hemoglobin (Hb) \<= 11g/dL at the time of randomization * planned to receive at least 2 more cycles of chemotherapy * Life expectancy \> 6 months * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score 0 or 1 * At least 18 years old using effective birth control or surgically sterile or postmenopausal for 1 year

Exclusion criteria

* Active second cancer * no recent history of clinically relevant thrombovascular event * Current treatment with anticoagulants * Brain metastasis or CNS involvement * Anemia secondary to another cause * Recent (within prior 1 months) use of an ESA * Patient pregnant or breast feeding * Progressive disease during adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy * Rapidly progressive or life-threatening metastatic disease * Concomitant endocrine therapy * Patient in whom the only site of metastasis was local and was successfully treated surgically.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression Free SurvivalFrom the date of randomization to the date of disease progression (PD) or death, whichever occurred first (up to 8.4 years)Progression free survival was based in investigator-determined progressive disease (PD) and calculated from the date of randomization to the date of PD or the date of death, whichever occurred first. Participants who had not progressed and were still alive at the time of clinical cut off were censored at the last disease assessment prior to the clinical cutoff. For PD or death with a missing interval immediately preceding the event, progression-free survival (PFS) was censored at the last disease assessment prior to the missing interval. Participants who withdrew from the study (withdrawal of consent or lost to follow-up) without progression were censored at the time of the last disease assessment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall SurvivalFrom randomization up to death from any cause (up to 8.4 years)Overall survival (OS) was defined as the interval between the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. For participants who were lost to follow-up or withdrew before the final database lock, OS was censored at the last date the participants was known to be alive. For participants who were still alive and on study at the time of the final database lock, OS was censored at the date of final database lock.
Time to Tumor ProgressionFrom date of randomization to the date of the first documented PD (up to 8.4 years)The Time to tumor progression (TTP) was defined as the time from the date of starting treatment until the date of first documented evidence of progression of tumor. TTP was measured from the date of randomization to the date of the first documented PD (including death due to PD without prior PD).
Overall Response Rate (ORR)every 8 weeks for 1 year and then every 12 weeks until PD or death, whichever occurred first (up to 8.4 years)Overall response was RECIST criteria. Complete response (CR) is appearance of all target and non-target lesions. Partial response (PR):a) 30% decrease in sum of lactate dehydrogenase(LD) of target lesions from baseline OR b) complete disappearance of target lesions, with persistence of one or more non-target measurable lesion or one or more non-measurable, evaluable lesions. Progressive disease(PD):a) 20% increase in sum of LDs of target lesions, taking as reference smallest sum LD recorded since treatment started; OR b) appearance of one or more new lesions or a clear worsening of measurable non-target lesions or evaluable disease with stable measurable lesions. Stable disease (SD):a) sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR;b) sufficient increase to qualify for PD. Non evaluable(NE) lesion: all other lesions, including small lesions (longest diameter \<20 millimeter (mm) with conventional techniques or \<10 mm with spiral CT scan) and truly non-measurable lesions.
Percentage of Participants With Suspected Thrombotic Vascular Events (TVEs)up to 8.4 yearsSuspected TVEs were identified by investigators and relevant clinical information was collected.

Countries

Argentina, Brazil, Bulgaria, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Georgia, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Mexico, North Macedonia, Philippines, Poland, Romania, Russia, South Africa, Taiwan, Ukraine, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Participants in safety data were grouped as treatment actually received (3 were assigned to SOC but received epoetin alfa; 2 were assigned to EPO, but received SOC) so, 1 more to EPO (1051) 1 less in SOC (1045) actually received treatment. Efficacy, safety were analyzed by 1050 (EPO), 1048 (SOC), 1051 (EPO), 1045 (SOC) respectively.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Standard Supportive Care (SOC)
Participants received standard supportive care as packed red blood cells (RBC) transfusion as per Investigator's discretion
1,048
Epoetin Alfa
Participants received SOC plus epoetin alfa 40,000 international units (IU) subcutaneously (SC) once a week.
1,050
Total2,098

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up8066
Overall StudyOther10393
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject5054

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicStandard Supportive Care (SOC)Epoetin AlfaTotal
Age, Continuous51.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.54
51.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.49
51.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.51
Region of Enrollment
ARGENTINA
4 Participants5 Participants9 Participants
Region of Enrollment
BRAZIL
27 Participants16 Participants43 Participants
Region of Enrollment
BULGARIA
14 Participants10 Participants24 Participants
Region of Enrollment
CHILE
11 Participants13 Participants24 Participants
Region of Enrollment
COLOMBIA
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
ECUADOR
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
GEORGIA
241 Participants200 Participants441 Participants
Region of Enrollment
HONG KONG
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
INDIA
211 Participants237 Participants448 Participants
Region of Enrollment
INDONESIA
4 Participants5 Participants9 Participants
Region of Enrollment
MACEDONIA
4 Participants5 Participants9 Participants
Region of Enrollment
MALAYSIA
7 Participants6 Participants13 Participants
Region of Enrollment
MEXICO
8 Participants12 Participants20 Participants
Region of Enrollment
PHILIPPINES
60 Participants54 Participants114 Participants
Region of Enrollment
ROMANIA
0 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
RUSSIA
102 Participants129 Participants231 Participants
Region of Enrollment
TAIWAN
19 Participants30 Participants49 Participants
Region of Enrollment
UKRAINE
328 Participants318 Participants646 Participants
Region of Enrollment
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
3 Participants5 Participants8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1048 Participants1050 Participants2098 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
883 / 1,045898 / 1,051
serious
Total, serious adverse events
229 / 1,045251 / 1,051

Outcome results

Primary

Progression Free Survival

Progression free survival was based in investigator-determined progressive disease (PD) and calculated from the date of randomization to the date of PD or the date of death, whichever occurred first. Participants who had not progressed and were still alive at the time of clinical cut off were censored at the last disease assessment prior to the clinical cutoff. For PD or death with a missing interval immediately preceding the event, progression-free survival (PFS) was censored at the last disease assessment prior to the missing interval. Participants who withdrew from the study (withdrawal of consent or lost to follow-up) without progression were censored at the time of the last disease assessment.

Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of disease progression (PD) or death, whichever occurred first (up to 8.4 years)

Population: The intent to treat (ITT) population included all participants who were randomized in either Standard of Care (SOC) or Epoetin alfa group.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Standard of Care (SOC)Progression Free Survival7.4 Months
Epoetin AlfaProgression Free Survival7.4 Months
Secondary

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

Overall response was RECIST criteria. Complete response (CR) is appearance of all target and non-target lesions. Partial response (PR):a) 30% decrease in sum of lactate dehydrogenase(LD) of target lesions from baseline OR b) complete disappearance of target lesions, with persistence of one or more non-target measurable lesion or one or more non-measurable, evaluable lesions. Progressive disease(PD):a) 20% increase in sum of LDs of target lesions, taking as reference smallest sum LD recorded since treatment started; OR b) appearance of one or more new lesions or a clear worsening of measurable non-target lesions or evaluable disease with stable measurable lesions. Stable disease (SD):a) sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR;b) sufficient increase to qualify for PD. Non evaluable(NE) lesion: all other lesions, including small lesions (longest diameter \<20 millimeter (mm) with conventional techniques or \<10 mm with spiral CT scan) and truly non-measurable lesions.

Time frame: every 8 weeks for 1 year and then every 12 weeks until PD or death, whichever occurred first (up to 8.4 years)

Population: The intent to treat (ITT) population included all participants who were randomized in either Standard of Care (SOC) or Epoetin alfa group.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Standard of Care (SOC)Overall Response Rate (ORR)Complete response (CR)3 Percentage of participants
Standard of Care (SOC)Overall Response Rate (ORR)Partial response (PR)48 Percentage of participants
Standard of Care (SOC)Overall Response Rate (ORR)Stable disease (SD)30 Percentage of participants
Standard of Care (SOC)Overall Response Rate (ORR)Progressive disease (PD)13 Percentage of participants
Standard of Care (SOC)Overall Response Rate (ORR)Not evaluable (NE)1 Percentage of participants
Standard of Care (SOC)Overall Response Rate (ORR)Not available (NA)5 Percentage of participants
Epoetin AlfaOverall Response Rate (ORR)Not evaluable (NE)2 Percentage of participants
Epoetin AlfaOverall Response Rate (ORR)Complete response (CR)3 Percentage of participants
Epoetin AlfaOverall Response Rate (ORR)Progressive disease (PD)12 Percentage of participants
Epoetin AlfaOverall Response Rate (ORR)Partial response (PR)47 Percentage of participants
Epoetin AlfaOverall Response Rate (ORR)Not available (NA)5 Percentage of participants
Epoetin AlfaOverall Response Rate (ORR)Stable disease (SD)32 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Overall Survival

Overall survival (OS) was defined as the interval between the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. For participants who were lost to follow-up or withdrew before the final database lock, OS was censored at the last date the participants was known to be alive. For participants who were still alive and on study at the time of the final database lock, OS was censored at the date of final database lock.

Time frame: From randomization up to death from any cause (up to 8.4 years)

Population: The intent to treat (ITT) population included all participants who were randomized in either Standard of Care (SOC) or Epoetin alfa group.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Standard of Care (SOC)Overall Survival18.0 Months
Epoetin AlfaOverall Survival17.8 Months
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Suspected Thrombotic Vascular Events (TVEs)

Suspected TVEs were identified by investigators and relevant clinical information was collected.

Time frame: up to 8.4 years

Population: The intent to treat (ITT) population included all participants who were randomized in either Standard of Care (SOC) or Epoetin alfa group.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Standard of Care (SOC)Percentage of Participants With Suspected Thrombotic Vascular Events (TVEs)3.72 Percentage of participants
Epoetin AlfaPercentage of Participants With Suspected Thrombotic Vascular Events (TVEs)4.86 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Time to Tumor Progression

The Time to tumor progression (TTP) was defined as the time from the date of starting treatment until the date of first documented evidence of progression of tumor. TTP was measured from the date of randomization to the date of the first documented PD (including death due to PD without prior PD).

Time frame: From date of randomization to the date of the first documented PD (up to 8.4 years)

Population: The intent to treat (ITT) population included all participants who were randomized in either Standard of Care (SOC) or Epoetin alfa group.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Standard of Care (SOC)Time to Tumor Progression7.5 Months
Epoetin AlfaTime to Tumor Progression7.5 Months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 5, 2026