Skip to content

Phase IIIb Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of Atazanavir/Ritonavir as Single Enhanced Protease Inhibitor Therapy in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-Infected Subjects Evidencing Virologic Suppression

Phase IIIb Multicenter, Single Arm, Open-Label Pilot Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of Maintenance With Atazanavir/Ritonavir as Single Enhanced Protease Inhibitor Therapy in HIV-Infected Patients Evidencing Virologic Suppression OREY (Only REYataz) Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00337467
Acronym
OREY
Enrollment
61
Registered
2006-06-16
Start date
2006-06-30
Completion date
2009-05-31
Last updated
2010-07-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Infections

Keywords

HIV-Infected Patients Evidencing Virologic Suppression

Brief summary

The main purpose is to explore whether atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/RTV) single enhanced protease inhibitor therapy can maintain virologic suppression without a marked increase in virologic failure.

Interventions

Capsules, Oral, ATV 300mg + RTV 100mg, once daily, 96 weeks

Sponsors

Bristol-Myers Squibb
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* On continued antiretroviral (ARV) treatment, with no discontinuation periods, for the previous 6 months (24 weeks). * Absence of evidence or suspected virologic failure on antiretroviral therapy * Absence of known primary mutations in the protease gene * Only 1 highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) prior to current one * HIV RNA \< 50 copies/mL in the last 6 months (single blip below 200 c/mL allowed) * On ATV/RTV +2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) (or 1 NRTI + tenofovir \[TDF\]) for at least 8 weeks before study entry, without treatment-limiting adverse effects

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of a newly diagnosed HIV-related opportunistic infection or any medical condition requiring acute therapy at the time of enrollment. * Active disease condition (e.g. moderate to severe hepatic impairment/active renal disease/history of clinically significant heart conduction disease) * Patients with chronic hepatitis B receiving lamivudine (3TC), Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF) or emtricitabine (FTC). * CD4 \< 100 cells/mm3 * Grade IV laboratory values: Hemoglobin \< 6.5 g/dL or white blood cells (WBC) \<800/mmm3 or absolute neutrophil count \< 500/mm3, or platelets \< 20,000/mm3 or diffuse petechiae.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure Through Week 48Week 48Treatment Failure through Week 48 defined as virologic rebound (HIV RNA \>=400 c/mL) on or before Week 48 or study discontinuation before Week 48. Virological rebound is defined as confirmed on-treatment HIV ribonucleic acid (RNA) \>= 400 c/mL at 2 consecutive visits or last on-treatment HIV RNA \>=400 c/mL followed by discontinuation of study therapy.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Virological Rebound Through Week 48Week 48Virological rebound is defined as confirmed on-treatment HIV RNA \>= 400 c/mL at 2 consecutive visits or last on-treatment HIV RNA \>=400 c/mL followed by discontinuation of study therapy. In addition, virologic rebound defined based on HIV RNA \>=50 c/m, latter analysis performed on subjects with baseline HIV RNA \< 50 c/mL.
Percentage of Participants With Virological Rebound Through Week 96Week 96Virological rebound is defined as confirmed on-treatment HIV RNA \>= 400 c/mL at 2 consecutive visits or last on-treatment HIV RNA \>=400 c/mL followed by discontinuation of study therapy. In addition, virologic rebound defined based on HIV RNA \>=50 c/m, latter analysis performed on subjects with baseline HIV RNA \< 50 c/mL.
Cumulative Proportion of Participants Without Treatment Failure Through Week 100Through Week 100This Kaplan-Meier life table reports the cumulative proportion of participants without treatment failure up to the end of the respective time interval. Failure time is measured from the start of study therapy, and is based on the earliest event defining failure (virologic rebound at or before Week 96, or discontinuation prior to Week 96).
Proportion of Participants With Virologic Rebound Through Week 96Through Week 96Virologic rebound is defined as confirmed on-study HIV RNA ≥ 400 c/mL or last on-study HIV RNA ≥ 400 c/mL followed by treatment discontinuation.
Mean Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4) Cell Count at Week 24Baseline, Week 24
Mean Change From Baseline in CD4 Cell Count at Week 48Baseline, Week 48
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure Through Week 96Week 96Treatment Failure through Week 96 defined as virologic rebound (HIV RNA \>=400 c/mL) on or before Week 96 or study discontinuation before Week 96. In addition, treatment failure defined based on HIV RNA \>= 50 c/mL, latter analysis performed on treated subjects with baseline HIV RNA \< 50 c/mL.
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths, and Discontinuations Due to AEsFrom Baseline through Week 96AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition that does not necessarily have a causal relationship to treatment. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an important medical event. AE grades are: mild (1), moderate (2), severe (3), life-threatening (4), and death (5).
Mean Percent Changes From Baseline in Fasting Total Cholesterol, High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol, and Triglycerides at Week 48Baseline, Week 48Lipid values after starting lipid-reducing agents are excluded from analyses. Baseline values are provided in Baseline Characteristics.
Mean Percent Changes From Baseline in Fasting Total Cholesterol, High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol, and Triglycerides at Week 96Baseline, Week 96Lipid values after starting lipid-reducing agents are excluded from analyses. Baseline values are provided in Baseline Characteristics.
Number of Participants With Genotype Substitutions for Virologic Rebounds (HIV-RNA ≥ 400 c/mL) Through Week 48Week 48International Aids Society of the United States (IAS-USA)-defined major protease inhibitor (PI) substitutions are V32I, L33F, M46I/L, I47V, G48V, I50L/V, I54M/L, I76V, I82A/F/T/S, I84V, N88S, and L90M. Reverse Transcriptase (RT) are TAMS and M184V.
Number of Participants With Genotype Substitutions for Virologic Rebounds (HIV-RNA ≥ 400 c/mL) Through Week 96Week 96International Aids Society of the United States (IAS-USA)-defined major protease inhibitor (PI) substitutions are V32I, L33F, M46I/L, I47V, G48V, I50L/V, I54M/L, I76V, I82A/F/T/S, I84V, N88S, and L90M. Reverse Transcriptase (RT) are TAMS and M184V.
Mean Change From Baseline in CD4 Cell Count at Week 96Baseline, Week 96

Countries

Spain

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

63 participants were enrolled in this study; 2 were never treated (1 no longer met study criteria and 1 concomitant medication not permitted).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) Monotherapy.
ATV/RTV treatment regimen was administered once daily. ATV: 2 x 150 mg capsules once daily with food (meal or snack), RTV: 1 x 100 mg capsule once daily with food (meal or snack)
61
Total61

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event3
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up2
Overall StudyPregnancy1
Overall StudySubject No Longer Met Study Criteria2
Overall StudySubject Withdrew Consent2

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAtazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) Monotherapy.
Age Continuous43 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
CD4 Count559 cell/mm3
STANDARD_DEVIATION 272.8
Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4) Categories
CD4 Count <200 cells/mm3
3 participants
Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4) Categories
CD4 Count >=200 cells/mm3
58 participants
Fasting High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol45 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4
Fasting Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol112 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 52.3
Fasting Non-HDL Cholesterol144 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 57.9
Fasting Total Cholesterol189 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 57
Fasting Triglycerides164 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 95.7
HIV RNA1.71 log10 c/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.152
Human Immunodeficiency Ribonucleic Acid (HIV RNA) Categories
HIV RNA <50 c/mL
60 Participants
Human Immunodeficiency Ribonucleic Acid (HIV RNA) Categories
HIV RNA >=50 c/mL
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
61 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
46 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
25 / 61
serious
Total, serious adverse events
12 / 61

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure Through Week 48

Treatment Failure through Week 48 defined as virologic rebound (HIV RNA \>=400 c/mL) on or before Week 48 or study discontinuation before Week 48. Virological rebound is defined as confirmed on-treatment HIV ribonucleic acid (RNA) \>= 400 c/mL at 2 consecutive visits or last on-treatment HIV RNA \>=400 c/mL followed by discontinuation of study therapy.

Time frame: Week 48

Population: Treated participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With Treatment Failure Through Week 4821.3 Percentage of Participants
95% CI: [11.9, 33.7]exact binomial methods
Secondary

Cumulative Proportion of Participants Without Treatment Failure Through Week 100

This Kaplan-Meier life table reports the cumulative proportion of participants without treatment failure up to the end of the respective time interval. Failure time is measured from the start of study therapy, and is based on the earliest event defining failure (virologic rebound at or before Week 96, or discontinuation prior to Week 96).

Time frame: Through Week 100

Population: treated participants; n= the number at risk entering interval

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyCumulative Proportion of Participants Without Treatment Failure Through Week 100Interval Week 4 - 8 (n=61)0.9836 proportion of participants
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyCumulative Proportion of Participants Without Treatment Failure Through Week 100Interval Week 8 - 12 (n=60)0.9508 proportion of participants
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyCumulative Proportion of Participants Without Treatment Failure Through Week 100Interval Week 12 - 16 (n=58)0.9016 proportion of participants
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyCumulative Proportion of Participants Without Treatment Failure Through Week 100Interval Week 16 - 20 (n=55)0.8852 proportion of participants
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyCumulative Proportion of Participants Without Treatment Failure Through Week 100Interval Week 20 - 24 (n=54)0.8689 proportion of participants
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyCumulative Proportion of Participants Without Treatment Failure Through Week 100Interval Week 24 - 28 (n=53)0.8525 proportion of participants
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyCumulative Proportion of Participants Without Treatment Failure Through Week 100Interval Week 32 - 36 (n=52)0.8197 proportion of participants
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyCumulative Proportion of Participants Without Treatment Failure Through Week 100Interval Week 36 - 40 (n=50)0.7869 proportion of participants
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyCumulative Proportion of Participants Without Treatment Failure Through Week 100Interval Week 48 - 52 (n=48)0.7541 proportion of participants
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyCumulative Proportion of Participants Without Treatment Failure Through Week 100Interval Week 56 - 60 (n=46)0.7377 proportion of participants
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyCumulative Proportion of Participants Without Treatment Failure Through Week 100Interval Week 64 - 68 (n=45)0.7049 proportion of participants
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyCumulative Proportion of Participants Without Treatment Failure Through Week 100Interval Week 68 - 72 (n=43)0.6885 proportion of participants
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyCumulative Proportion of Participants Without Treatment Failure Through Week 100Interval Week 72 - 76 (n=42)0.6721 proportion of participants
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyCumulative Proportion of Participants Without Treatment Failure Through Week 100Interval Week 84 - 88 (n=41)0.6557 proportion of participants
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyCumulative Proportion of Participants Without Treatment Failure Through Week 100Interval Week 92 - 96 (n=40)0.6557 proportion of participants
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyCumulative Proportion of Participants Without Treatment Failure Through Week 100Interval Week 96 - 100 (n=31)0.6557 proportion of participants
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in CD4 Cell Count at Week 48

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: n=number of participants with CD4 cell count at baseline and at Week 48.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyMean Change From Baseline in CD4 Cell Count at Week 48Baseline Value (n=61)559 cells /mm3Standard Deviation 272.8
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyMean Change From Baseline in CD4 Cell Count at Week 48Change at Week 48 (n=46)53 cells /mm3Standard Deviation 203.5
95% CI: [-7.1, 113.7]normal approximation for 95% CI
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in CD4 Cell Count at Week 96

Time frame: Baseline, Week 96

Population: n=number of participants with CD4 cell count at baseline and at Week 96.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyMean Change From Baseline in CD4 Cell Count at Week 96Change at Week 96 (n=40)63 cells /mm3Standard Deviation 208.1
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyMean Change From Baseline in CD4 Cell Count at Week 96Baseline Value (n=61)559 cells /mm3Standard Deviation 272.8
95% CI: [-4, 129.1]normal approximation for 95% CI
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4) Cell Count at Week 24

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: n=number of participants with CD4 cell count at baseline and at Week 24

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyMean Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4) Cell Count at Week 24Baseline Value (n=61)559 cells /mm3Standard Deviation 272.8
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyMean Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4) Cell Count at Week 24Change at Week 24 (n=51)61 cells /mm3Standard Deviation 173.3
95% CI: [12.3, 109.8]normal approximation for 95% CI
Secondary

Mean Percent Changes From Baseline in Fasting Total Cholesterol, High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol, and Triglycerides at Week 48

Lipid values after starting lipid-reducing agents are excluded from analyses. Baseline values are provided in Baseline Characteristics.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: n= number of treated participants with baseline measure and measure at Week 48

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyMean Percent Changes From Baseline in Fasting Total Cholesterol, High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol, and Triglycerides at Week 48Total Cholesterol (n=36)9 percent changeStandard Deviation 18
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyMean Percent Changes From Baseline in Fasting Total Cholesterol, High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol, and Triglycerides at Week 48HDL Cholesterol (n=35)2 percent changeStandard Deviation 18.5
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyMean Percent Changes From Baseline in Fasting Total Cholesterol, High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol, and Triglycerides at Week 48Non-HDL Cholesterol (n=35)12 percent changeStandard Deviation 24.4
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyMean Percent Changes From Baseline in Fasting Total Cholesterol, High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol, and Triglycerides at Week 48LDL Cholesterol (n=33)20 percent changeStandard Deviation 33.4
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyMean Percent Changes From Baseline in Fasting Total Cholesterol, High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol, and Triglycerides at Week 48Triglycerides (n=36)17 percent changeStandard Deviation 51.4
Comparison: Percent Change from Baseline in Fasting Total Cholesterol at Week 4895% CI: [2.5, 14.6]normal approximation for 95% CI
Comparison: Percent Change from Baseline in Fasting HDL Cholesterol at Week 4895% CI: [-3.9, 8.8]normal approximation for 95% CI
Comparison: Percent Change from Baseline in Fasting Non-HDL Cholesterol at Week 4895% CI: [4, 20.8]normal approximation for 95% CI
Comparison: Percent Change from Baseline in Fasting LDL Cholesterol at Week 4895% CI: [8, 31.7]normal approximation for 95% CI
Comparison: Percent Change from Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides at Week 4895% CI: [-0.4, 34.4]normal approximation for 95% CI
Secondary

Mean Percent Changes From Baseline in Fasting Total Cholesterol, High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol, and Triglycerides at Week 96

Lipid values after starting lipid-reducing agents are excluded from analyses. Baseline values are provided in Baseline Characteristics.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 96

Population: n=number of treated participants with baseline measure and measure at Week 96

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyMean Percent Changes From Baseline in Fasting Total Cholesterol, High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol, and Triglycerides at Week 96Total Cholesterol (n=29)14 percent changeStandard Deviation 17.4
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyMean Percent Changes From Baseline in Fasting Total Cholesterol, High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol, and Triglycerides at Week 96HDL Cholesterol (n=29)2 percent changeStandard Deviation 21.2
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyMean Percent Changes From Baseline in Fasting Total Cholesterol, High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol, and Triglycerides at Week 96Non-HDL Cholesterol (n=29)19 percent changeStandard Deviation 23.7
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyMean Percent Changes From Baseline in Fasting Total Cholesterol, High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol, and Triglycerides at Week 96LDL Cholesterol (n=28)29 percent changeStandard Deviation 34.4
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyMean Percent Changes From Baseline in Fasting Total Cholesterol, High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol, and Triglycerides at Week 96Triglycerides (n=29)16 percent changeStandard Deviation 67.2
Comparison: Percent Change from Baseline in Fasting Total Cholesterol at Week 9695% CI: [6.9, 20.1]normal approximation for 95% CI
Comparison: Percent Change from Baseline in Fasting HDL Cholesterol at Week 9695% CI: [-6, 10.2]normal approximation for 95% CI
Comparison: Percent Change from Baseline in Fasting Non-HDL Cholesterol at Week 9695% CI: [10.3, 28.4]normal approximation for 95% CI
Comparison: Percent Change from Baseline in Fasting LDL Cholesterol at Week 9695% CI: [15.3, 42]normal approximation for 95% CI
Comparison: Percent Change from Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides at Week 9695% CI: [-9.5, 41.6]normal approximation for 95% CI
Secondary

Number of Participants With Genotype Substitutions for Virologic Rebounds (HIV-RNA ≥ 400 c/mL) Through Week 48

International Aids Society of the United States (IAS-USA)-defined major protease inhibitor (PI) substitutions are V32I, L33F, M46I/L, I47V, G48V, I50L/V, I54M/L, I76V, I82A/F/T/S, I84V, N88S, and L90M. Reverse Transcriptase (RT) are TAMS and M184V.

Time frame: Week 48

Population: Number of participants with virologic rebounds (HIV-RNA ≥ 400 c/mL) through Week 48.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Genotype Substitutions for Virologic Rebounds (HIV-RNA ≥ 400 c/mL) Through Week 48IAS-USA-defined major PI substitutions1 participants
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Genotype Substitutions for Virologic Rebounds (HIV-RNA ≥ 400 c/mL) Through Week 48RT substitutions0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Genotype Substitutions for Virologic Rebounds (HIV-RNA ≥ 400 c/mL) Through Week 96

International Aids Society of the United States (IAS-USA)-defined major protease inhibitor (PI) substitutions are V32I, L33F, M46I/L, I47V, G48V, I50L/V, I54M/L, I76V, I82A/F/T/S, I84V, N88S, and L90M. Reverse Transcriptase (RT) are TAMS and M184V.

Time frame: Week 96

Population: Number of participants with virologic rebounds (HIV-RNA ≥ 400 c/mL) through Week 96.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Genotype Substitutions for Virologic Rebounds (HIV-RNA ≥ 400 c/mL) Through Week 96IAS-USA-defined major PI substitutions2 participants
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyNumber of Participants With Genotype Substitutions for Virologic Rebounds (HIV-RNA ≥ 400 c/mL) Through Week 96RT substitutions0 participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths, and Discontinuations Due to AEs

AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition that does not necessarily have a causal relationship to treatment. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an important medical event. AE grades are: mild (1), moderate (2), severe (3), life-threatening (4), and death (5).

Time frame: From Baseline through Week 96

Population: Treated Participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths, and Discontinuations Due to AEsAll Grades AEs75.4 percentage of participants
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths, and Discontinuations Due to AEsAll Grades AEs Related to Study Therapy13.1 percentage of participants
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths, and Discontinuations Due to AEsGrade 3 to Grade 4 AEs18 percentage of participants
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths, and Discontinuations Due to AEsGrade 3 to Grade 4 AEs Related to Study Therapy3.3 percentage of participants
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths, and Discontinuations Due to AEsDeaths3.3 percentage of participants
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths, and Discontinuations Due to AEsSAEs19.7 percentage of participants
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths, and Discontinuations Due to AEsSAEs Related to Study Therapy0 percentage of participants
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths, and Discontinuations Due to AEsAEs Leading to Discontinuation4.9 percentage of participants
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths, and Discontinuations Due to AEsLipodystrophy-Related AEs1.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure Through Week 96

Treatment Failure through Week 96 defined as virologic rebound (HIV RNA \>=400 c/mL) on or before Week 96 or study discontinuation before Week 96. In addition, treatment failure defined based on HIV RNA \>= 50 c/mL, latter analysis performed on treated subjects with baseline HIV RNA \< 50 c/mL.

Time frame: Week 96

Population: Treated participants. For the second row (n=60), one subject was excluded because of baseline HIV RNA \> 50 c/mL.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With Treatment Failure Through Week 96HIV RNA >= 400 c/mL(n=61)34.4 percentage of participants
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With Treatment Failure Through Week 96HIV RNA>=50 c/mL w/Baseline HIV RNA<50 c/mL (n=60)43.3 percentage of participants
95% CI: [22.7, 47.7]exact binomial methods
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Virological Rebound Through Week 48

Virological rebound is defined as confirmed on-treatment HIV RNA \>= 400 c/mL at 2 consecutive visits or last on-treatment HIV RNA \>=400 c/mL followed by discontinuation of study therapy. In addition, virologic rebound defined based on HIV RNA \>=50 c/m, latter analysis performed on subjects with baseline HIV RNA \< 50 c/mL.

Time frame: Week 48

Population: Treated participants. For the second row (n=60), one subject was excluded because of baseline HIV RNA \> 50 c/mL.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With Virological Rebound Through Week 48HIV RNA >= 400 c/mL (n=61)12 percentage of participants
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With Virological Rebound Through Week 48HIV RNA>=50 c/mL w/Baseline HIV RNA<50 c/mL (n=60)26.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Virological Rebound Through Week 96

Virological rebound is defined as confirmed on-treatment HIV RNA \>= 400 c/mL at 2 consecutive visits or last on-treatment HIV RNA \>=400 c/mL followed by discontinuation of study therapy. In addition, virologic rebound defined based on HIV RNA \>=50 c/m, latter analysis performed on subjects with baseline HIV RNA \< 50 c/mL.

Time frame: Week 96

Population: Treated participants. For the second row (n=60), one subject was excluded because of baseline HIV RNA \> 50 c/mL.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With Virological Rebound Through Week 96HIV RNA >= 400 c/mL (n=61)14.8 percentage of participants
Atazanavir (ATV)/Ritonavir (RTV) MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With Virological Rebound Through Week 96HIV RNA>=50 c/mL w/Baseline HIV RNA<50 c/mL (n=60)33.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Proportion of Participants With Virologic Rebound Through Week 96

Virologic rebound is defined as confirmed on-study HIV RNA ≥ 400 c/mL or last on-study HIV RNA ≥ 400 c/mL followed by treatment discontinuation.

Time frame: Through Week 96

Population: This analysis was not done; however, percentage of participants with virologic rebound through Weeks 48 and 96 are reported in Secondary Outcome Measures 3 and 4. Time to reatment failure (defined as the earlier of virologic rebound or treatment discontinuation) is reported in Secondary Outcome Measure 5.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026