Skip to content

E7389 Versus Capecitabine in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Treated With Anthracyclines and Taxanes

A Phase III Open Label, Randomized Two-Parallel-Arm Multicenter Study of E7389 Versus Capecitabine in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Treated With Anthracyclines and Taxanes

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00337103
Enrollment
1276
Registered
2006-06-15
Start date
2006-09-20
Completion date
2017-12-11
Last updated
2020-06-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Metastatic Breast Cancer

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare E7389 versus capecitabine in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who are refractory to the most recent chemotherapy. This is an open-label, randomized, two-parallel arm study. Patients will be randomized to receive either E7389 or capecitabine on a one-to-one ratio.

Interventions

DRUGEribulin Mesylate

1.4 mg/m\^2 intravenous (IV) infusion given over 2-5 minutes on Days 1 and 8 every 21 days

DRUGCapecitabine

Capecitabine 2.5 g/m\^2/day administered orally twice daily in two equal doses on Days 1 to 14 every 21 days

Sponsors

Eisai Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Female patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed carcinoma of the breast. Every effort should be made to ensure that paraffin embedded tissue or slides from the diagnostic biopsy or surgical specimen are available for confirmation of diagnosis. 2. Patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease who have received up to three prior chemotherapy regimens, and no more than two prior regimens for advanced and/or metastatic disease. * Regimens must have included an anthracycline (e.g., doxorubicin, epirubicin) and a taxane (e.g., paclitaxel, docetaxel), either in combination or in separate regimens. * Patients with known human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2/neu) over-expressing tumors may additionally have been treated with trastuzumab in centers where this treatment is available. * Patients with known estrogen and/or progesterone receptor-expressing tumors may have additionally been treated with hormonal therapy. 3. Resolution of all chemotherapy or radiation-related toxicities to Grade 1 severity or lower, except for stable sensory neuropathy \<= Grade 2 and alopecia. 4. Age \>= 18 years. 5. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1 or 2. 6. Life expectancy of \>= 3 months. 7. Adequate renal function as evidenced by serum creatinine \<1.5 mg/dL or calculated creatinine clearance \> 50 mL/minute (min) per the Cockcroft and Gault formula. 8. Adequate bone marrow function as evidenced by absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \>= 1.5 x 10\^9/L, hemoglobin \>= 10.0 g/dL (a hemoglobin \< 10.0 g/dL acceptable if it is corrected by growth factor or transfusion), and platelet count \>= 100 x 10\^9/L. 9. Adequate liver function as evidenced by bilirubin \<= 1.5 times the upper limits of normal (ULN) and alkaline phosphatase, alanine transaminase (ALT), and aspartate transaminase (AST) \<= 3 x ULN (in the case of liver metastases \<= 5 x ULN), or in case of bone metastases, liver specific alkaline phosphatase \<= 3 x ULN. 10. Patients willing and able to complete the EORTC (European Organization for Research on the Treatment of Cancer) quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-C30 with breast cancer module QLQ-BR23) and to record their pain level on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). 11. Patients willing and able to comply with the study protocol for the duration of the study. 12. Written informed consent prior to any study-specific screening procedures with the understanding that the patient may withdraw consent at any time without prejudice.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients who have received more than three prior chemotherapy regimens for their disease, including adjuvant therapies, or patients who have received more than two prior chemotherapy regimens for advanced disease (other therapies are allowed e.g., anti-estrogens, trastuzumab and radiotherapy). 2. Patients who have received capecitabine as a prior therapy for their disease. 3. Patients who have received chemotherapy, radiation, or biological therapy within two weeks, or hormonal therapy, within one week before study treatment start, or any investigational drug within four weeks before study treatment start. 4. Radiation therapy encompassing \> 30% of marrow. 5. Prior treatment with mitomycin C or nitrosourea. 6. Pulmonary lymphangitic involvement that results in pulmonary dysfunction requiring active treatment, including the use of oxygen. 7. Patients with brain or subdural metastases are not eligible, unless they have completed local therapy and have discontinued the use of corticosteroids for this indication for at least 4 weeks before starting treatment with study treatment. Any symptoms attributed to brain metastases must be stable for at least 4 weeks before starting study treatment; radiographic stability should be determined by comparing a contrast-enhanced Computed Tomography Scan (CT) or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) brain scan performed during screening to a prior scan performed at least 4 weeks earlier. 8. Patients with meningeal carcinomatosis. 9. Patients who are receiving anti-coagulant therapy with warfarin or related compounds, other than for line patency, and cannot be changed to heparin-based therapy, are not eligible. If a patient is to continue on mini-dose warfarin, then the prothrombin time (PT)/international normalized ratio (INR) must be closely monitored. 10. Women who are pregnant or breast-feeding; women of childbearing potential with either a positive pregnancy test at screening or no pregnancy test; women of childbearing potential unless (1) surgically sterile or (2) using adequate measures of contraception (considered to be two methods of contraception, one of which must be a barrier method, e.g. condom, diaphragm or cervical cap). Perimenopausal women must be amenorrheic for at least 12 months to be considered of non-childbearing potential. 11. Severe/uncontrolled intercurrent illness/infection. 12. Significant cardiovascular impairment (history of congestive heart failure \> New York Heart Association \[NYHA\] Grade II, unstable angina or myocardial infarction within the past six months, or serious cardiac arrhythmia). 13. Patients with organ allografts requiring immunosuppression. 14. Patients with known positive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) status. 15. Patients who have had a prior malignancy, other than carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or non-melanoma skin cancer, unless the prior malignancy was diagnosed and definitively treated \>= 5 years previously with no subsequent evidence of recurrence. 16. Patients with pre-existing neuropathy \> Grade 2. 17. Patients with a hypersensitivity to halichondrin B and/or halichondrin B chemical derivative. 18. Patients who participated in a prior E7389 clinical trial. 19. Patients with other significant disease or disorders that, in the Investigator's opinion, would exclude the patient from the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Survival (OS)From date of randomization until date of death from any cause, assessed up to data cutoff date of 12 Mar 2012, or up to approximately 6 yearsOS was measured from the date of randomization until the date of death from any cause, or the last date the participant was known to be alive. Participants who were lost to follow-up or who were alive at the date of data cutoff were censored. The censoring rules for OS were as follows: 1) if the participant was still alive at data cutoff, the date of data cutoff was considered the end date, and 2) if the participant was lost to follow-up before data cutoff, the date they were last known to be alive was considered the end date. Participants who survived past the end of the study were counted as in the full study period. If death occurred after data cutoff, the end date was to be censored at the time of data cutoff.
Progression Free Survival (PFS)From date of randomization to the date of disease progression or death (whichever occurred first), assessed up to data cutoff date of 12 Mar 2012 or up to approximately 6 yearsPFS was defined as the time (in days) from the date of randomization to the date of the first sign of disease progression based on Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 (v 1.1) or date of death, regardless of cause. Disease progression was measured by computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed on lesions targeted at baseline for tumor assessment. Disease progression (as assessed by independent review of the imaging scans) per RECIST v 1.1 was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of the target lesions (taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including the baseline sum if that is the smallest), and an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeter (mm). Note that the appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered as disease progression.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Objective Response Rate (ORR): Independent ReviewFrom date of randomization until date of first documentation of CR or PR, assessed up to data cutoff date of 12 Mar 2012 or up to approximately 6 yearsORR was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 (v 1.1). CR is defined as disappearance of all target legions and non-target lesions. All pathological lymph nodes (whether target and non-target), must have reduction in their short axis to less than 10 mm. PR is defined as at least 30% decrease in the sum of the long diameter LD (hereafter referred to as sum of LD) of all target lesions, as compared with Baseline summed LD.
Duration of Response (DOR): Independent ReviewFrom first documented CR or PR until date of recurrent or progressive disease or death, assessed up to data cutoff of date of 12 Mar 2012 or up to approximately 6 yearsDOR was defined as the time from first documented CR or PR until disease progression or death from any cause for those participants with a confirmed PR or CR measured by RECIST v1.1. CR defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. All pathological lymph nodes(whether target and non-target), must have reduction in their short axis to less than 10 mm. PR defined as at least 30% decrease in the sum of the long diameter LD (hereafter referred to as sum of LD) of all target lesions, as compared with Baseline summed LD.
Overall Survival RateFrom the date of randomization to Year 1, 2 and 3One-, two-, and three- year's survival rates were defined as the percentage of participants who were alive at one, two, and three years respectively, and estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Greenwood Formula.
Change From Baseline in Pain Intensity by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Until 30 Days After the Last Dose of Study DrugFirst dose of study drug (Baseline) up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (up to approximately 6 years 3 months)Pain intensity was measured by marking a single vertical line that crosses a 1-100 mm unmarked VAS scale. The left-end of the visual analog scale was labelled least possible pain and the right-end of the visual analog scale was labelled worst possible pain. The pain rating ranged from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating more pain. A negative change score indicated improvement.
Number of Participants With Consumption of Analgesics During the StudyFirst dose of study drug (Baseline) up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (up to approximately 6 years 3 months)Participants took analgesics as concomitant pain medications which are defined as pain medications that (1) started before the first dose of study drug and were continuing at the time of the first dose of study drug, or (2) started on/after the day of the first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug medication
Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by European Organization for the Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire Scores Based on Core 30 Items (EORTC-QLQ-C30) at Week 6Baseline and Week 6EORTC-QLQ-C30:cancer-specific instrument with 30 questions to assess the participant QoL. First 28 questions used to evaluate 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain) and other single items(dyspnoea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea, financial difficulties). Each of these 28 questions assessed on 4-point scale(1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much); functional scales: higher score=better level of functioning; symptom scale: higher score=more severe symptoms; for single items: higher score= more severe problem. Last 2 questions used to evaluate global health status (GHS)/QoL. Each question was assessed on 7-point scale (1=very poor to 7=excellent). Scores averaged, transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score=better quality of life/better level of functioning.
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Parameter ValuesFirst dose of study drug (Baseline) up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (up to approximately 6 years 3 months)
Number of Participants Who Took at Least One Concomitant MedicationFirst dose of study drug (Baseline) up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (up to approximately 6 years 3 months)Concomitant medications included medications that either (1) started before the first dose of study drug and were continuing at the time of the first dose of study drug, or (2) started on or after the first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug.
Duration of Eribulin Mesylate ExposureUp to approximately 6 years for primary analysis completion stage, Up to approximately 6 years 2 months for final analysis completion stageData have been reported per primary analysis completion stage and final analysis completion stage. After primary analysis completion (at cutoff date of 12 March 2012), only 10 participants were still receiving study treatment.
Plasma Concentrations of Eribulin MesylateCycle 1 Day 1: 5-10 minutes(min), 15-30 min, 30-60 min, 60-90 min, 2-4 hours(hrs), 4-8 hrs, 10-24 hrs, 48-72 hrs, 72-96 hrs, 96-120 hrs after the start of infusion of Eribulin mesylate (Duration of each cycle is 21 days)
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)First dose of study drug (Baseline) up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (up to approximately 6 years 3 months)TEAEs included both SAEs as well as non-SAEs.
Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire Scores Based on Breast Cancer Specific 23 Items (EORTC-QLQ- BR 23) at Week 6Baseline and Week 6EORTC-QLQ-BR23:disease-specific module for breast cancer developed as a supplement for the EORTC-QLQ-C30 to assess quality of life of participants with breast cancer. The scores from 23 items of QLQ-BR23 included functional scales (body image, sexual functioning, sexual enjoyment, future perspective), symptom scales (systemic therapy side effects, breast symptoms, arm symptoms, upset by hair loss). Each item was rated on a scale of 1 to 4 to record level of intensity (1= not at all, 2= a little, 3= quite a bit, 4= very much) within each scales. Scores averaged and transformed to 0-100 scale. High score indicated high/better level of functioning/healthy functioning. Negative change from Baseline indicated deterioration in QOL and positive change from Baseline indicated an improvement in QOL.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Czechia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Mexico, Poland, Romania, Russia, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Taiwan, Ukraine, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A total of 1276 participants were enrolled and screened, of which 174 were screen failures and 1102 were randomized in the study. Of the randomized participants, 1090 participants received the study treatment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Eribulin Mesylate 1.4 mg/m^2
Eribulin mesylate 1.4 mg/m\^2 intravenous (IV) infusion given over 2-5 minutes on Days 1 and 8 every 21 days.
554
Capecitabine 2.5 g/m^2/Day
Capecitabine : Capecitabine 2.5 g/m\^2/day administered orally twice daily in two equal doses on Days 1 to 14 every 21 days.
548
Total1,102

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event4559
Overall StudyClinical Progression2724
Overall StudyDeath10
Overall StudyEntry Criteria Not Met41
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up12
Overall StudyOther56
Overall StudyPhysician Decision1514
Overall StudyProgressive Disease414410
Overall StudySubject Choice3427
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject85

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCapecitabine 2.5 g/m^2/DayTotalEribulin Mesylate 1.4 mg/m^2
Age, Continuous52.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2
53.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.29
53.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.37
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
18 Participants36 Participants18 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
16 Participants31 Participants15 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
19 Participants44 Participants25 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
495 Participants991 Participants496 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
548 Participants1102 Participants554 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
442 / 544459 / 546
other
Total, other adverse events
509 / 544489 / 546
serious
Total, serious adverse events
95 / 544115 / 546

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was measured from the date of randomization until the date of death from any cause, or the last date the participant was known to be alive. Participants who were lost to follow-up or who were alive at the date of data cutoff were censored. The censoring rules for OS were as follows: 1) if the participant was still alive at data cutoff, the date of data cutoff was considered the end date, and 2) if the participant was lost to follow-up before data cutoff, the date they were last known to be alive was considered the end date. Participants who survived past the end of the study were counted as in the full study period. If death occurred after data cutoff, the end date was to be censored at the time of data cutoff.

Time frame: From date of randomization until date of death from any cause, assessed up to data cutoff date of 12 Mar 2012, or up to approximately 6 years

Population: Data was analyzed using the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population defined as all participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Eribulin Mesylate 1.4 mg/m^2Overall Survival (OS)484 days
Capecitabine 2.5 g/m^2/DayOverall Survival (OS)440 days
Primary

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time (in days) from the date of randomization to the date of the first sign of disease progression based on Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 (v 1.1) or date of death, regardless of cause. Disease progression was measured by computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed on lesions targeted at baseline for tumor assessment. Disease progression (as assessed by independent review of the imaging scans) per RECIST v 1.1 was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of the target lesions (taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including the baseline sum if that is the smallest), and an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeter (mm). Note that the appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered as disease progression.

Time frame: From date of randomization to the date of disease progression or death (whichever occurred first), assessed up to data cutoff date of 12 Mar 2012 or up to approximately 6 years

Population: Data was analyzed using the ITT Population defined as all participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Eribulin Mesylate 1.4 mg/m^2Progression Free Survival (PFS)126 Days
Capecitabine 2.5 g/m^2/DayProgression Free Survival (PFS)129 Days
Secondary

Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire Scores Based on Breast Cancer Specific 23 Items (EORTC-QLQ- BR 23) at Week 6

EORTC-QLQ-BR23:disease-specific module for breast cancer developed as a supplement for the EORTC-QLQ-C30 to assess quality of life of participants with breast cancer. The scores from 23 items of QLQ-BR23 included functional scales (body image, sexual functioning, sexual enjoyment, future perspective), symptom scales (systemic therapy side effects, breast symptoms, arm symptoms, upset by hair loss). Each item was rated on a scale of 1 to 4 to record level of intensity (1= not at all, 2= a little, 3= quite a bit, 4= very much) within each scales. Scores averaged and transformed to 0-100 scale. High score indicated high/better level of functioning/healthy functioning. Negative change from Baseline indicated deterioration in QOL and positive change from Baseline indicated an improvement in QOL.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 6

Population: Data was analyzed using the ITT Population defined as all participants who were randomized. Here,number analyzed signifies the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure for individual row.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Eribulin Mesylate 1.4 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire Scores Based on Breast Cancer Specific 23 Items (EORTC-QLQ- BR 23) at Week 6Body Image0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.26
Eribulin Mesylate 1.4 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire Scores Based on Breast Cancer Specific 23 Items (EORTC-QLQ- BR 23) at Week 6Sexual functioning1.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.75
Eribulin Mesylate 1.4 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire Scores Based on Breast Cancer Specific 23 Items (EORTC-QLQ- BR 23) at Week 6Sexual enjoyment0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.58
Eribulin Mesylate 1.4 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire Scores Based on Breast Cancer Specific 23 Items (EORTC-QLQ- BR 23) at Week 6Future perspective7.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.48
Eribulin Mesylate 1.4 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire Scores Based on Breast Cancer Specific 23 Items (EORTC-QLQ- BR 23) at Week 6Systemic therapy side effects4.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.55
Eribulin Mesylate 1.4 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire Scores Based on Breast Cancer Specific 23 Items (EORTC-QLQ- BR 23) at Week 6Breast Symptoms-3.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.55
Eribulin Mesylate 1.4 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire Scores Based on Breast Cancer Specific 23 Items (EORTC-QLQ- BR 23) at Week 6Arm Symptoms-4.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.94
Eribulin Mesylate 1.4 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire Scores Based on Breast Cancer Specific 23 Items (EORTC-QLQ- BR 23) at Week 6Upset by hair loss-4.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.66
Capecitabine 2.5 g/m^2/DayChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire Scores Based on Breast Cancer Specific 23 Items (EORTC-QLQ- BR 23) at Week 6Upset by hair loss-10.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.76
Capecitabine 2.5 g/m^2/DayChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire Scores Based on Breast Cancer Specific 23 Items (EORTC-QLQ- BR 23) at Week 6Body Image4.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.8
Capecitabine 2.5 g/m^2/DayChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire Scores Based on Breast Cancer Specific 23 Items (EORTC-QLQ- BR 23) at Week 6Systemic therapy side effects-1.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.73
Capecitabine 2.5 g/m^2/DayChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire Scores Based on Breast Cancer Specific 23 Items (EORTC-QLQ- BR 23) at Week 6Sexual functioning-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.62
Capecitabine 2.5 g/m^2/DayChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire Scores Based on Breast Cancer Specific 23 Items (EORTC-QLQ- BR 23) at Week 6Arm Symptoms-3.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.65
Capecitabine 2.5 g/m^2/DayChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire Scores Based on Breast Cancer Specific 23 Items (EORTC-QLQ- BR 23) at Week 6Sexual enjoyment3.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.49
Capecitabine 2.5 g/m^2/DayChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire Scores Based on Breast Cancer Specific 23 Items (EORTC-QLQ- BR 23) at Week 6Breast Symptoms-3.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.2
Capecitabine 2.5 g/m^2/DayChange From Baseline in European Organization for the Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire Scores Based on Breast Cancer Specific 23 Items (EORTC-QLQ- BR 23) at Week 6Future perspective10.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.84
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by European Organization for the Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire Scores Based on Core 30 Items (EORTC-QLQ-C30) at Week 6

EORTC-QLQ-C30:cancer-specific instrument with 30 questions to assess the participant QoL. First 28 questions used to evaluate 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain) and other single items(dyspnoea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea, financial difficulties). Each of these 28 questions assessed on 4-point scale(1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much); functional scales: higher score=better level of functioning; symptom scale: higher score=more severe symptoms; for single items: higher score= more severe problem. Last 2 questions used to evaluate global health status (GHS)/QoL. Each question was assessed on 7-point scale (1=very poor to 7=excellent). Scores averaged, transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score=better quality of life/better level of functioning.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 6

Population: Data was analyzed using the ITT Population defined as all participants who were randomized. Here,overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Eribulin Mesylate 1.4 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by European Organization for the Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire Scores Based on Core 30 Items (EORTC-QLQ-C30) at Week 60.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.23
Capecitabine 2.5 g/m^2/DayChange From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life (QoL) Measured by European Organization for the Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire Scores Based on Core 30 Items (EORTC-QLQ-C30) at Week 61.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.69
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Pain Intensity by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Until 30 Days After the Last Dose of Study Drug

Pain intensity was measured by marking a single vertical line that crosses a 1-100 mm unmarked VAS scale. The left-end of the visual analog scale was labelled least possible pain and the right-end of the visual analog scale was labelled worst possible pain. The pain rating ranged from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating more pain. A negative change score indicated improvement.

Time frame: First dose of study drug (Baseline) up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (up to approximately 6 years 3 months)

Population: Data was analyzed using the ITT Population defined as all participants who were randomized. Here, overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for the outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Eribulin Mesylate 1.4 mg/m^2Change From Baseline in Pain Intensity by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Until 30 Days After the Last Dose of Study Drug-3.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.8
Capecitabine 2.5 g/m^2/DayChange From Baseline in Pain Intensity by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Until 30 Days After the Last Dose of Study Drug0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.9
Secondary

Duration of Eribulin Mesylate Exposure

Data have been reported per primary analysis completion stage and final analysis completion stage. After primary analysis completion (at cutoff date of 12 March 2012), only 10 participants were still receiving study treatment.

Time frame: Up to approximately 6 years for primary analysis completion stage, Up to approximately 6 years 2 months for final analysis completion stage

Population: Data was analyzed using safety population defined as all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. Here, number analyzed signifies the participants who were evaluable at individual stage for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Eribulin Mesylate 1.4 mg/m^2Duration of Eribulin Mesylate ExposureAt primary analysis completion stage125.0 days
Eribulin Mesylate 1.4 mg/m^2Duration of Eribulin Mesylate ExposureAt final analysis completion stage1743.0 days
Capecitabine 2.5 g/m^2/DayDuration of Eribulin Mesylate ExposureAt primary analysis completion stage119.0 days
Capecitabine 2.5 g/m^2/DayDuration of Eribulin Mesylate ExposureAt final analysis completion stage1506.0 days
Secondary

Duration of Response (DOR): Independent Review

DOR was defined as the time from first documented CR or PR until disease progression or death from any cause for those participants with a confirmed PR or CR measured by RECIST v1.1. CR defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. All pathological lymph nodes(whether target and non-target), must have reduction in their short axis to less than 10 mm. PR defined as at least 30% decrease in the sum of the long diameter LD (hereafter referred to as sum of LD) of all target lesions, as compared with Baseline summed LD.

Time frame: From first documented CR or PR until date of recurrent or progressive disease or death, assessed up to data cutoff of date of 12 Mar 2012 or up to approximately 6 years

Population: Data was analyzed using for a subset of participants in the ITT Population who had a response. Here, overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Eribulin Mesylate 1.4 mg/m^2Duration of Response (DOR): Independent Review198 days
Capecitabine 2.5 g/m^2/DayDuration of Response (DOR): Independent Review330 days
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Took at Least One Concomitant Medication

Concomitant medications included medications that either (1) started before the first dose of study drug and were continuing at the time of the first dose of study drug, or (2) started on or after the first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug.

Time frame: First dose of study drug (Baseline) up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (up to approximately 6 years 3 months)

Population: Data was analyzed using safety population defined as all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Eribulin Mesylate 1.4 mg/m^2Number of Participants Who Took at Least One Concomitant Medication496 Participants
Capecitabine 2.5 g/m^2/DayNumber of Participants Who Took at Least One Concomitant Medication483 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Consumption of Analgesics During the Study

Participants took analgesics as concomitant pain medications which are defined as pain medications that (1) started before the first dose of study drug and were continuing at the time of the first dose of study drug, or (2) started on/after the day of the first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug medication

Time frame: First dose of study drug (Baseline) up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (up to approximately 6 years 3 months)

Population: Data was analyzed using safety population defined as all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Eribulin Mesylate 1.4 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Consumption of Analgesics During the Study222 Participants
Capecitabine 2.5 g/m^2/DayNumber of Participants With Consumption of Analgesics During the Study196 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

TEAEs included both SAEs as well as non-SAEs.

Time frame: First dose of study drug (Baseline) up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (up to approximately 6 years 3 months)

Population: Data was analyzed using safety population defined as all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Eribulin Mesylate 1.4 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)TEAEs512 Participants
Eribulin Mesylate 1.4 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs95 Participants
Capecitabine 2.5 g/m^2/DayNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)TEAEs494 Participants
Capecitabine 2.5 g/m^2/DayNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs115 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Parameter Values

Time frame: First dose of study drug (Baseline) up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (up to approximately 6 years 3 months)

Population: Data was analyzed using safety population defined as all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Eribulin Mesylate 1.4 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Parameter Values362 Participants
Capecitabine 2.5 g/m^2/DayNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Parameter Values224 Participants
Secondary

Objective Response Rate (ORR): Independent Review

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 (v 1.1). CR is defined as disappearance of all target legions and non-target lesions. All pathological lymph nodes (whether target and non-target), must have reduction in their short axis to less than 10 mm. PR is defined as at least 30% decrease in the sum of the long diameter LD (hereafter referred to as sum of LD) of all target lesions, as compared with Baseline summed LD.

Time frame: From date of randomization until date of first documentation of CR or PR, assessed up to data cutoff date of 12 Mar 2012 or up to approximately 6 years

Population: Data was analyzed using the ITT Population defined as all participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Eribulin Mesylate 1.4 mg/m^2Objective Response Rate (ORR): Independent Review11.0 percentage of participants
Capecitabine 2.5 g/m^2/DayObjective Response Rate (ORR): Independent Review11.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Overall Survival Rate

One-, two-, and three- year's survival rates were defined as the percentage of participants who were alive at one, two, and three years respectively, and estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Greenwood Formula.

Time frame: From the date of randomization to Year 1, 2 and 3

Population: Data was analyzed using the ITT Population defined as all participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Eribulin Mesylate 1.4 mg/m^2Overall Survival RateAt 1-year0.644 percentage of participants
Eribulin Mesylate 1.4 mg/m^2Overall Survival RateAt 2-years0.328 percentage of participants
Eribulin Mesylate 1.4 mg/m^2Overall Survival RateAt 3-years0.178 percentage of participants
Capecitabine 2.5 g/m^2/DayOverall Survival RateAt 1-year0.580 percentage of participants
Capecitabine 2.5 g/m^2/DayOverall Survival RateAt 2-years0.298 percentage of participants
Capecitabine 2.5 g/m^2/DayOverall Survival RateAt 3-years0.145 percentage of participants
Secondary

Plasma Concentrations of Eribulin Mesylate

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1: 5-10 minutes(min), 15-30 min, 30-60 min, 60-90 min, 2-4 hours(hrs), 4-8 hrs, 10-24 hrs, 48-72 hrs, 72-96 hrs, 96-120 hrs after the start of infusion of Eribulin mesylate (Duration of each cycle is 21 days)

Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis set included all participants who have received at least one dose of E7389 and have at least one quantifiable E7389 concentration. Here, number analyzed signifies the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure for given time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Eribulin Mesylate 1.4 mg/m^2Plasma Concentrations of Eribulin Mesylate4-8 hours10.0 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 5.4
Eribulin Mesylate 1.4 mg/m^2Plasma Concentrations of Eribulin Mesylate10-24 hours5.8 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 3.72
Eribulin Mesylate 1.4 mg/m^2Plasma Concentrations of Eribulin Mesylate5-10 minutes415.8 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 719.5
Eribulin Mesylate 1.4 mg/m^2Plasma Concentrations of Eribulin Mesylate15-30 minutes152.6 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 70.51
Eribulin Mesylate 1.4 mg/m^2Plasma Concentrations of Eribulin Mesylate30-60 minutes95.5 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 87.9
Eribulin Mesylate 1.4 mg/m^2Plasma Concentrations of Eribulin Mesylate60-90 minutes52.7 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 79.33
Eribulin Mesylate 1.4 mg/m^2Plasma Concentrations of Eribulin Mesylate2-4 hours20.7 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 32.81
Eribulin Mesylate 1.4 mg/m^2Plasma Concentrations of Eribulin Mesylate48-72 hours3.7 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 2.58
Eribulin Mesylate 1.4 mg/m^2Plasma Concentrations of Eribulin Mesylate72-96 hours2.4 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 1.6
Eribulin Mesylate 1.4 mg/m^2Plasma Concentrations of Eribulin Mesylate96-120 hours7.6 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 38.75

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 18, 2026