Skip to content

International Active Surveillance Study of Women Taking Oral Contraceptives (INAS-OC)

International Active Surveillance Study of Women Taking Oral Contraceptives (INAS OC)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00335257
Enrollment
85109
Registered
2006-06-09
Start date
2005-08-31
Completion date
2013-03-31
Last updated
2019-08-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Contraception

Keywords

Drospirenone, Safety, INAS

Brief summary

The study compares the short- and long-term risks of a 24-day regimen of a drospirenone-containing oral contraceptive with the risks of established oral contraceptives in a study population that is representative for the actual users of the individual preparations.

Detailed description

Drospirenone is a novel progestogen with antiandrogenic and antimineralocorticoid properties. A large active post-marketing surveillance study has demonstrated that a 21-day regimen of 3mg drospirenone and 30mcg ethinylestradiol can be used safely for oral contraception. This study investigates the risks of short and long-term use of a 24-day regimen of drospirenone/ethinylestradiol in comparison to established OCs in a study population that is representative of the actual users of the individual preparations. INAS-OC is a prospective, controlled, non-interventional cohort study with two study arms: OCs containing drospirenone and OCs containing any other progestogen. The study was started in the USA in April 2005 and was extended to several European countries in September 2008 based on the launch status of the 24-day regimen. New users of an OC (starters, switchers without a pill intake break and recurrent users with a pill intake break \[same or different OC\]) are accrued by a network of prescribing physicians. Baseline and follow-up information are collected via a self-administered questionnaire. Data analysis will be based on life-table methods comparing the cohorts. All analyses will make allowance for confounding, using methods that will include multivariate techniques such as Cox regression.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Bayer
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Center for Epidemiology and Health Research, Germany
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* First-ever OC users (starters) * Women switching OC use without a pill intake break (switchers) * Recurrent users with a pill intake break (recurrent users) * Women willing to participate in the active surveillance

Exclusion criteria

* Women who do not agree to participate * Long-term users

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Venous Thromboembolism (VTE); Hazard Ratio for DRSP-24 Day vs. Non-DRSP OCsWithin 60 monthsVenous thromboembolism (VTE) hazard ratio for oral contraceptives containing both drospirenone (DRSP) and ethinylestradiol (EE) in a 24-day regimen or any oral contraceptive without DRSP.
Arterial Thromboembolism (ATE), Hazard Ratio for DRSP-24 Day vs. Non-DRSP OCsWithin 60 monthsArterial thromboembolism (ATE) in women using oral contraceptives containing both drospirenone (DRSP) and ethinylestradiol (EE) in a 24-day regimen or any oral contraceptive without DRSP. Cox regression analysis was not carried out. In accordance to the analysis plan, hazard ratios were only to be calculated if a minimum of 5 confirmed events were available in each of the comparison groups.

Countries

Germany

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Overall, 91,474 patients were recruited for the INAS-OC study. Of these, 6,365 participants were excluded due to protocol violations.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
OC DRSP-24d
OCs containing DRSP (Yaz®, 24 day regimen )
15,542
OC DRSP-21d
OCs containing DRSP (Yasmin®, 21 day regimen)
9,377
OCs Non-DRSP
Users of OCs containing other progestins
60,190
Total85,109

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOC DRSP-21dOCs Non-DRSPOC DRSP-24dTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
1149 Participants7582 Participants2054 Participants10785 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
8227 Participants52608 Participants13488 Participants74323 Participants
Age, Continuous26.14 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.48
26.34 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.73
26.21 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.64
26.29 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.69
Region of Enrollment
Austria
611 participants2945 participants738 participants4294 participants
Region of Enrollment
Croatia
68 participants371 participants509 participants948 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
1438 participants11207 participants922 participants13567 participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
1427 participants2657 participants1644 participants5728 participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
1457 participants3664 participants1169 participants6290 participants
Region of Enrollment
Sweden
398 participants1454 participants261 participants2113 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
3978 participants37892 participants10299 participants52169 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9377 Participants60190 Participants15542 Participants85109 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 7,2640 / 5,6050 / 39,3160 / 4,0700 / 28,854
serious
Total, serious adverse events
583 / 7,264499 / 5,6052,740 / 39,316254 / 4,0701,756 / 28,854

Outcome results

Primary

Arterial Thromboembolism (ATE), Hazard Ratio for DRSP-24 Day vs. Non-DRSP OCs

Arterial thromboembolism (ATE) in women using oral contraceptives containing both drospirenone (DRSP) and ethinylestradiol (EE) in a 24-day regimen or any oral contraceptive without DRSP. Cox regression analysis was not carried out. In accordance to the analysis plan, hazard ratios were only to be calculated if a minimum of 5 confirmed events were available in each of the comparison groups.

Time frame: Within 60 months

Population: Study participants that were not excluded due to protocol violation

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
OC DRSP-24dArterial Thromboembolism (ATE), Hazard Ratio for DRSP-24 Day vs. Non-DRSP OCsof which transient ischemic attack (TIA)1 participants
OC DRSP-24dArterial Thromboembolism (ATE), Hazard Ratio for DRSP-24 Day vs. Non-DRSP OCsTotal number of ATE4 participants
OC DRSP-24dArterial Thromboembolism (ATE), Hazard Ratio for DRSP-24 Day vs. Non-DRSP OCsof which peripheral ATE0 participants
OC DRSP-24dArterial Thromboembolism (ATE), Hazard Ratio for DRSP-24 Day vs. Non-DRSP OCsof which acute myocardial infarction2 participants
OC DRSP-24dArterial Thromboembolism (ATE), Hazard Ratio for DRSP-24 Day vs. Non-DRSP OCsof which ichemic stroke1 participants
OC DRSP-21dArterial Thromboembolism (ATE), Hazard Ratio for DRSP-24 Day vs. Non-DRSP OCsof which transient ischemic attack (TIA)0 participants
OC DRSP-21dArterial Thromboembolism (ATE), Hazard Ratio for DRSP-24 Day vs. Non-DRSP OCsof which ichemic stroke3 participants
OC DRSP-21dArterial Thromboembolism (ATE), Hazard Ratio for DRSP-24 Day vs. Non-DRSP OCsof which acute myocardial infarction0 participants
OC DRSP-21dArterial Thromboembolism (ATE), Hazard Ratio for DRSP-24 Day vs. Non-DRSP OCsof which peripheral ATE0 participants
OC DRSP-21dArterial Thromboembolism (ATE), Hazard Ratio for DRSP-24 Day vs. Non-DRSP OCsTotal number of ATE3 participants
OCs Non-DRSPArterial Thromboembolism (ATE), Hazard Ratio for DRSP-24 Day vs. Non-DRSP OCsof which ichemic stroke15 participants
OCs Non-DRSPArterial Thromboembolism (ATE), Hazard Ratio for DRSP-24 Day vs. Non-DRSP OCsTotal number of ATE30 participants
OCs Non-DRSPArterial Thromboembolism (ATE), Hazard Ratio for DRSP-24 Day vs. Non-DRSP OCsof which acute myocardial infarction10 participants
OCs Non-DRSPArterial Thromboembolism (ATE), Hazard Ratio for DRSP-24 Day vs. Non-DRSP OCsof which transient ischemic attack (TIA)3 participants
OCs Non-DRSPArterial Thromboembolism (ATE), Hazard Ratio for DRSP-24 Day vs. Non-DRSP OCsof which peripheral ATE2 participants
NOHCArterial Thromboembolism (ATE), Hazard Ratio for DRSP-24 Day vs. Non-DRSP OCsof which peripheral ATE1 participants
NOHCArterial Thromboembolism (ATE), Hazard Ratio for DRSP-24 Day vs. Non-DRSP OCsTotal number of ATE2 participants
NOHCArterial Thromboembolism (ATE), Hazard Ratio for DRSP-24 Day vs. Non-DRSP OCsof which transient ischemic attack (TIA)0 participants
NOHCArterial Thromboembolism (ATE), Hazard Ratio for DRSP-24 Day vs. Non-DRSP OCsof which ichemic stroke0 participants
NOHCArterial Thromboembolism (ATE), Hazard Ratio for DRSP-24 Day vs. Non-DRSP OCsof which acute myocardial infarction1 participants
No UseArterial Thromboembolism (ATE), Hazard Ratio for DRSP-24 Day vs. Non-DRSP OCsof which ichemic stroke2 participants
No UseArterial Thromboembolism (ATE), Hazard Ratio for DRSP-24 Day vs. Non-DRSP OCsof which transient ischemic attack (TIA)2 participants
No UseArterial Thromboembolism (ATE), Hazard Ratio for DRSP-24 Day vs. Non-DRSP OCsTotal number of ATE7 participants
No UseArterial Thromboembolism (ATE), Hazard Ratio for DRSP-24 Day vs. Non-DRSP OCsof which peripheral ATE0 participants
No UseArterial Thromboembolism (ATE), Hazard Ratio for DRSP-24 Day vs. Non-DRSP OCsof which acute myocardial infarction3 participants
Primary

Venous Thromboembolism (VTE); Hazard Ratio for DRSP-24 Day vs. Non-DRSP OCs

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) hazard ratio for oral contraceptives containing both drospirenone (DRSP) and ethinylestradiol (EE) in a 24-day regimen or any oral contraceptive without DRSP.

Time frame: Within 60 months

Population: Study participants that were not excluded due to protocol violation

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
OC DRSP-24dVenous Thromboembolism (VTE); Hazard Ratio for DRSP-24 Day vs. Non-DRSP OCs19 participants
OC DRSP-21dVenous Thromboembolism (VTE); Hazard Ratio for DRSP-24 Day vs. Non-DRSP OCs16 participants
OCs Non-DRSPVenous Thromboembolism (VTE); Hazard Ratio for DRSP-24 Day vs. Non-DRSP OCs101 participants
NOHCVenous Thromboembolism (VTE); Hazard Ratio for DRSP-24 Day vs. Non-DRSP OCs7 participants
No UseVenous Thromboembolism (VTE); Hazard Ratio for DRSP-24 Day vs. Non-DRSP OCs19 participants
Comparison: Tested null hypotheses: the VTE hazard ratio for DRSP(24d) vs. Non-DRSP is higher or equal to 295% CI: [0.5, 1.3]

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 30, 2026