Skip to content

Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel Open-Label Study in Advanced Parkinson's Disease

An Open-Label, 12-Month Safety and Efficacy Study of Levodopa - Carbidopa Intestinal Gel in Levodopa-Responsive Subjects With Advanced Parkinson's Disease and Severe Motor Fluctuations Despite Optimized Treatment With Available Parkinson's Disease Medications

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00335153
Enrollment
354
Registered
2006-06-09
Start date
2008-01-31
Completion date
2012-06-30
Last updated
2015-01-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Advanced Parkinson's Disease

Keywords

severe motor fluctuations, levodopa, levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel, efficacy, dyskinesia, Parkinson's Disease, carbidopa, DUOPA

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study will be to provide further evidence of the long-term safety and tolerability of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (Duodopa®) over 12-months in participants with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) and severe motor fluctuations.

Detailed description

The study was composed of a screening period followed by 3 sequential on-treatment periods, as follows: * Screening Period (up to 28 days): determination of eligibility and discontinuation of antiparkinsonian disease medications other than levodopa-carbidopa immediate release (LC-oral) prior to nasojejunal (NJ) tube placement. * NJ Test Period (2 to 14 days): first hospitalization period, Baseline assessments, placement of NJ tube, and optimization of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) treatment via NJ tube and infusion pump (participant was hospitalized for NJ tube placement but hospitalization was not required for entire duration of LCIG treatment optimization). * PEG-J Period (2 to 14 days): second hospitalization period; placement of PEG-J tube; further optimization of LCIG treatment. * Post PEG-J Long-Term Treatment Period (Day 28 to Day 378): LCIG administration via a permanent PEG-J tube and infusion pump, with dosage adjusted according to clinical condition.

Interventions

DEVICEJ-tube

jejunal tube

DEVICEPEG tube

percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube

Infusion should be kept within a range of 0.5-10 mL/hour (10-200 mg levodopa/hour) and is usually 2-6 mL/hour (40-120 mg levodopa/hour).

Sponsors

Quintiles, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott)
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) according to United Kingdom Parkinson's Disease Society (UKPDS) Brain Bank Criteria * Levodopa-responsive with severe motor fluctuations * Recognizable off and on state (motor fluctuations) confirmed by diary

Exclusion criteria

* Diagnosis is unclear or a suspicion of other parkinsonian syndromes exists such as secondary parkinsonism * Undergone surgery for the treatment of PD * Contraindications to levodopa (such as narrow angle glaucoma)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEsScreening through Day 378 + 30 daysAE=any untoward medical occurrence which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that: results in death; is life-threatening (an event in which the subject was at risk of death at the time of the event); requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or other important medical events. Treatment-emergent events (TEAE or TESAE)=those starting after the first dose of study drug. Severe=severity reported as 'severe' or missing. Possibly or Probably Treatment Related=drug-event relationship reported as 'possible', 'probable' or missing. Death=a fatal outcome of an SAE or AE.
Number of Participants With Device Complications During the Nasojejunal (NJ) Test PeriodNJ Test Period (from 2 to 14 days)Complications of the infusion device were collected during the NJ Test period. Pump, intestinal tube, NJ tube, and other complications included (but were not limited to) device breakage, device leakage, device malfunction, device misuse, device occlusion, intentional and unintentional device removal by participant, complication of device insertion, device dislocation, device breakage, device dislocation, and post-procedural hemorrhage.
Number of Participants With Device Complications During the Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy - With Jejunal Extension Tube (PEG-J) Surgery and Post-PEG Long Term Treatment PeriodsPEG-J Surgery Period (from 2 to 14 days) through the Long Term Treatment Period (Day 28 to Day 378)Complications of the infusion device were collected during the PEG-J Surgery and Post-PEG Long-Term Treatment periods. Pump, PEG-J, stoma, and other complications included (but were not limited to) device breakage, device leakage, device malfunction, device misuse, device occlusion, intentional and unintentional device removal by participant, complication of device insertion, device dislocation, device breakage, device dislocation, and post-procedural hemorrhage.
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersScreening through Day 378Potentially clinically significant values for red blood cells (RBCs), hemoglobin, and hematocrit are specified for females (f) and males (m) separately in the category rows.
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersScreening through Day 378Terms abbreviated in the table include aspartate aminotransferase (AST), upper limit of normal (ULN), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), female (f), and male (m).
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign Parametersup to 56 weeksTerms abbreviated in the table include supine systolic blood pressure (SuSBP), standing systolic blood pressure (StSBP), orthostatic systolic blood pressure (OSBP), supine diastolic blood pressure (SuDBP), standing diastolic blood pressure (StDBP), orthostatic diastolic blood pressure (ODBP), supine pulse (SuP) in beats per minute (bpm), standing pulse (StP), and body temperature (Temp). Increase and decrease are signified by ↑ and ↓, respectively.
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersScreening through Day 378Terms abbreviated in the table include heart rate (HR) in beats per minute (bpm), PR interval (PRI), QT interval corrected for heart rate using Bazett's formula (QTcB), and QT interval corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula (QTcF). Increase and decrease are signified by ↑ and ↓, respectively.
Number of Participants With Sleep Attacks at BaselineBaselineTo prospectively monitor for the possible development of sleep attacks, participants were asked if they had experienced any events in which they fell asleep suddenly or unexpectedly, including while engaged in some activity (e.g., eating/drinking, speaking, or driving) or at rest, with or without any previous warning of sleepiness. Those participants who reported 1 or more sleep attacks were asked to report the number of sleep attacks they experienced, whether they experienced sleepiness or drowsiness prior to the sleep attack, whether they experienced a 'bad' outcome or problem due to a sleep attack, and if so, how many 'bad' outcomes or problems they experienced.
Number of Participants With Sleep Attacks During the Post-PEG Long-Term Treatment PeriodDuring the Post-PEG Long-Term Treatment Period (Day 28 through Day 378)To prospectively monitor for the possible development of sleep attacks, participants were asked if they had experienced any events in which they fell asleep suddenly or unexpectedly, including while engaged in some activity (e.g., eating/drinking, speaking, or driving) or at rest, with or without any previous warning of sleepiness. Those participants who reported 1 or more sleep attacks were asked to report the number of sleep attacks they experienced, whether they experienced sleepiness or drowsiness prior to the sleep attack, whether they experienced a 'bad' outcome or problem due to a sleep attack, and if so, how many 'bad' outcomes or problems they experienced.
Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and During the Post-PEG Long-term Treatment (PPLT) PeriodBaseline, during the Post-PEG Long-term Treatment Period (Day 28 through Day 378)The MIDI is a validated assessment of impulsive behavior consisting of a semistructured clinical interview assessing pathological gambling, trichotillomania (compulsive hair-pulling), kleptomania (compulsive stealing), pyromania (compulsive fire setting), intermittent explosive disorder, compulsive buying, and compulsive sexual behavior.
Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Total Score at EndpointBaseline, Endpoint (last Post-PEG Long-Term Period visit up to Day 378)The AIMS is an investigator-completed rating scale that has a total of 12 items rating involuntary movements of various areas of the participant's body. Items 1 through 10 are rated on a 5-point scale of severity from 0 (none), 1 (minimal), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), to 4 (severe), and items 11 and 12 are yes/no questions regarding issues with teeth or dentures. The total AIMS score was calculated by summing items 1-10, with a possible range of 0-40; a negative change indicates improvement. The AIMS was to be performed at consistent times, when the subject was experiencing his/her worst On time (dyskinesia \[involuntary muscle movement\]).
Number of Participants With Confirmed Cases of MelanomaScreening up to Day 378A comprehensive assessment for the presence of melanoma was performed during the screening period and at early termination or end of study by a dermatologist experienced with the diagnosis of the condition. If a suspicious lesion was present, a biopsy was obtained for proper diagnosis.
Number of Participants Taking at Least 1 Concomitant Medication During the StudyScreening up to Day 378Concomitant medications include those started on or after the first open-label LCIG infusion as well as medications started prior to the first open-label infusion but continued during the study.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Stigma Domain Score at EndpointBaseline, Endpoint (last post-baseline visit up to Day 378)The PDQ-39 is a self-administered questionnaire which comprises 39 items addressing 8 domains of health in Parkinson's disease patients. The PDQ-39 Domain: Stigma (e.g., social embarrassment) consists of 4 questions, each answered on a 5-point scale. The domain scores are calculated by first summing the answers to the questions in the domain. The sum is divided by the highest score possible (i.e., number of answers multiplied by 4) and the quotient is multiplied by 100 to put the score on a scale from 0 to 100, where lower scores indicate a better perceived health status. Higher scores are consistently associated with the more severe symptoms of the disease such as tremor and stiffness.
Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Social Support Domain Score at EndpointBaseline, Endpoint (last post-baseline visit up to Day 378)The PDQ-39 is a self-administered questionnaire which comprises 39 items addressing 8 domains of health in Parkinson's disease patients. The PDQ-39 Domain: Social Support includes 3 questions, each answered on a 5-point scale. The domain scores are calculated by first summing the answers to the questions in the domain. The sum is divided by the highest score possible (i.e., number of answers multiplied by 4) and the quotient is multiplied by 100 to put the score on a scale from 0 to 100, where lower scores indicate a better perceived health status. Higher scores are consistently associated with the more severe symptoms of the disease such as tremor and stiffness.
Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Cognition Domain Score at EndpointBaseline, Endpoint (last post-baseline visit up to Day 378)The PDQ-39 is a self-administered questionnaire which comprises 39 items addressing 8 domains of health in Parkinson's disease patients. The PDQ-39 Domain: Cognition includes 4 questions, each answered on a 5-point scale. The domain scores are calculated by first summing the answers to the questions in the domain. The sum is divided by the highest score possible (i.e., number of answers multiplied by 4) and the quotient is multiplied by 100 to put the score on a scale from 0 to 100, where lower scores indicate a better perceived health status. Higher scores are consistently associated with the more severe symptoms of the disease such as tremor and stiffness.
Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Communication Domain Score at EndpointBaseline, Endpoint (last post-baseline visit up to Day 378)The PDQ-39 is a self-administered questionnaire which comprises 39 items addressing 8 domains of health in Parkinson's disease patients. The PDQ-39 Domain: Communication includes 3 questions, each answered on a 5-point scale. The domain scores are calculated by first summing the answers to the questions in the domain. The sum is divided by the highest score possible (i.e., number of answers multiplied by 4) and the quotient is multiplied by 100 to put the score on a scale from 0 to 100, where lower scores indicate a better perceived health status. Higher scores are consistently associated with the more severe symptoms of the disease such as tremor and stiffness.
Change From Baseline in Average Daily Off Time at EndpointBaseline, Endpoint (last post-baseline visit up to Day 378)Based on the Parkinson's Disease Symptom Diary. On time is when PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Off time is when PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. The diary is completed every 30 minutes for the full 24 hours of each of 3 days prior to selected clinic visits. It reflects both time awake and time asleep. Daily totals are normalized to a 16-hour scale (i.e. 16 hours of awake time). The normalized totals for the 3 days prior to the visit are averaged for the analysis. Negative change from baseline for off time indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life Scale (EQ-5D) Summary Index at EndpointBaseline, Endpoint (last post-baseline visit up to Day 378)The EQ-5D is a participant answered questionnaire scoring 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. EQ-5D health states, defined by the EQ-5D descriptive system, are converted into a single summary index by applying a formula that essentially attaches values (also called QOL weights or QOL utilities) to each of the levels in each dimension. EQ-5D Summary Index values range from -0.11 to 1.00 with positive change indicating improvement.
Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life Scale (EQ-5D) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at EndpointBaseline, Endpoint (last post-baseline visit up to Day 378)The EQ-5D VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a scale from 0-100 where 100 is the 'best imaginable health state' and 0 is the 'worst imaginable health state'.
Change From Baseline in Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) Total Score at EndpointBaseline, Endpoint (last post-baseline visit up to Day 378)The ZBI is a 22-item questionnaire regarding the caregiver/subject relationship and evaluates the caregiver's health condition, psychological well-being, finances and social life. Each question is answered on a 5-point scale (0=never, 1=rarely, 2=sometimes, 3=quite frequently, and 4=nearly always). The caregiver burden is evaluated by the total score (Range 0 to 88) obtained from the sum of the answers to the 22 questions. Higher scores are associated with a higher level of burden for the caregiver.
Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Bodily Discomfort Domain Score at EndpointBaseline, Endpoint (last post-baseline visit up to Day 378)The PDQ-39 is a self-administered questionnaire which comprises 39 items addressing 8 domains of health in Parkinson's disease patients. The PDQ-39 Domain: Bodily Discomfort includes 3 questions, each answered on a 5-point scale. The domain scores are calculated by first summing the answers to the questions in the domain. The sum is divided by the highest score possible (i.e., number of answers multiplied by 4) and the quotient is multiplied by 100 to put the score on a scale from 0 to 100, where lower scores indicate a better perceived health status. Higher scores are consistently associated with the more severe symptoms of the disease such as tremor and stiffness.
Change From Baseline in Average Daily Normalized On Time With Troublesome Dyskinesia at EndpointBaseline, Endpoint (last post-baseline visit up to Day 378)Based on the Parkinson's Disease Symptom Diary. On time is when PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Off time is when PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. The diary is completed every 30 minutes for the full 24 hours of each of 3 days prior to selected clinic visits. It reflects both time awake and time asleep. Daily totals are normalized to a 16-hour scale (i.e. 16 hours of awake time). The normalized totals for the 3 days prior to the visit are averaged for the analysis.
Change From Baseline in Average Daily On Time Without Troublesome Dyskinesia at EndpointBaseline, Endpoint (last post-baseline visit up to Day 378)Based on the Parkinson's Disease Symptom Diary. On time is when PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Off time is when PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. On time without troublesome dyskinesia (involuntary muscle movement) is defined as on time without dyskinesia and on time with non-troublesome dyskinesia. The diary is completed every 30 minutes for the full 24 hours of each of 3 days prior to selected clinic visits. It reflects both time awake and time asleep. Daily totals are normalized to a 16-hour scale (i.e. 16 hours of awake time). The normalized totals for the 3 days prior to the visit are averaged for the analysis. Positive change from Baseline for on time without troublesome dyskinesia indicates improvement.
Clinical Global Impression - Status (CGI-S) Score at Baseline and Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Score at EndpointBaseline, Endpoint (last post-baseline visit up to Day 378)The CGI-S is a global assessment by the Investigator of current symptomatology and impact of illness on functioning. The ratings of the CGI-S are as follows: 1 = normal, 2 = borderline ill, 3 = mildly ill, 4 = moderately ill, 5 = markedly ill, 6 = severely ill, and 7 = among the most extremely ill. The CGI-I is a global assessment by the Investigator of the change in clinical status since the start of treatment. The CGI-I ratings are as follows: 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, 7 = very much worse.
Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part I Score at Month 12Baseline, Endpoint (last post-baseline visit up to Day 378)The UPDRS is an Investigator-used rating tool to follow the longitudinal course of Parkinson's disease. The Part I Score is the sum of the answers to the 4 questions that comprise Part I, each of which are measured on a 5-point scale (0-4). The Part I score ranges from 0-16 and higher scores are associated with more disability.
Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part II Score at EndpointBaseline, Endpoint (last post-baseline visit up to Day 378)The UPDRS is an Investigator-used rating tool to follow the longitudinal course of Parkinson's disease. The Part II score is the sum of the answers to the 13 questions that comprise Part II, each of which are measured on a 5-point scale (0-4). The Part II score ranges from 0-52 and higher scores are associated with more disability.
Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Score at EndpointBaseline, Endpoint (last post-baseline visit up to Day 378)The UPDRS is an Investigator-used rating tool to follow the longitudinal course of Parkinson's disease. The Part III score is the sum of the 27 answers provided to the 14 Part III questions, each of which are measured on a 5-point scale (0-4). The Part III score ranges from 0-108 and higher scores are associated with more disability.
Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Total Score at EndpointBaseline, Endpoint (last post-baseline visit up to Day 378)The UPDRS is an Investigator-used rating tool to follow the longitudinal course of Parkinson's disease. The total score is the sum of the responses to the 31 questions (44 answers) that comprise Parts I-III of the scale. The total score will range from 0-176, with 176 representing the worst (total) disability, and 0 representing no disability.
Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part IV Score at EndpointBaseline, Endpoint (last post-baseline visit up to Day 378)The UPDRS is an Investigator-used rating tool to follow the longitudinal course of Parkinson's disease. The Part IV Score is the sum of the answers to the 11 questions that comprise Part IV, each of which are measured on a 5-point scale (0-4) or a 2-point scale (0 or 1). The Part IV score ranges from 0-23 and higher scores are associated with more disability.
Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Summary Index at EndpointBaseline, Endpoint (last post-baseline visit up to Day 378)The PDQ-39 is a self-administered questionnaire which comprises 39 items addressing 8 domains of health in Parkinson's disease patients. These include: mobility, activities of daily living, emotional well-being, stigma, social support, cognition, communication, and bodily discomfort. The PDQ-39 Summary Index is the sum of all answers divided by the highest score possible (i.e. number of answers multiplied by 4) which is multiplied by 100 to put the score on a 0-100 scale. Higher scores are associated with more severe symptoms.
Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Mobility Domain Score at EndpointBaseline, Endpoint (last post-baseline visit up to Day 378)The PDQ-39 is a self-administered questionnaire which comprises 39 items addressing 8 domains of health in Parkinson's disease patients. The PDQ-39 Domain: Mobility (e.g., fear of falling when walking) includes 10 questions, each answered on a 5-point scale. The domain scores are calculated by first summing the answers to the questions in the domain. The sum is divided by the highest score possible (i.e., number of answers multiplied by 4) and the quotient is multiplied by 100 to put the score on a scale from 0 to 100, where lower scores indicate a better perceived health status. Higher scores are consistently associated with the more severe symptoms of the disease such as tremor and stiffness.
Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Activities of Daily Living Domain Score at EndpointBaseline, Endpoint (last post-baseline visit up to Day 378)The PDQ-39 is a self-administered questionnaire which comprises 39 items addressing 8 domains of health in Parkinson's disease patients. The PDQ-39 Domain: Activities of Daily Living (e.g., difficulty cutting food) includes 6 questions, each answered on a 5-point scale. The domain scores are calculated by first summing the answers to the questions in the domain. The sum is divided by the highest score possible (i.e., number of answers multiplied by 4) and the quotient is multiplied by 100 to put the score on a scale from 0 to 100, where lower scores indicate a better perceived health status. Higher scores are consistently associated with the more severe symptoms of the disease such as tremor and stiffness.
Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Emotional Well-Being Domain Score at EndpointBaseline, Endpoint (last post-baseline visit up to Day 378)The PDQ-39 is a self-administered questionnaire which comprises 39 items addressing 8 domains of health in Parkinson's disease patients. The PDQ-39 Domain: Emotional Well-being (e.g., feelings of isolation) includes 6 questions, each answered on a 5-point scale. The domain scores are calculated by first summing the answers to the questions in the domain. The sum is divided by the highest score possible (i.e., number of answers multiplied by 4) and the quotient is multiplied by 100 to put the score on a scale from 0 to 100, where lower scores indicate a better perceived health status. Higher scores are consistently associated with the more severe symptoms of the disease such as tremor and stiffness.

Countries

Australia, Canada, Czechia, Finland, Germany, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Spain, Thailand, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)
All participants were to receive LCIG, via the NJ tube during the NJ Test Period and delivered to the proximal small intestine via PEG-J during the Post-PEG-J Long-Term Treatment Period. The starting dose was individually determined based on the daily dose of oral levodopa prior to study enrollment. The infusion dose was individually optimized for each participant on the basis of response and potential adverse events. During the Post-PEG-J Long-Term Treatment Period, LCIG was expected to be infused continuously over approximately 16 hours daily with a rate of infusion ranging from 1 to 10 mL/hour (20 to 200 mg of levodopa/hour), in most instances.
354
Total354

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Nasojejunal (NJ) Test PeriodAdministrative1
Nasojejunal (NJ) Test PeriodAdverse Event5
Nasojejunal (NJ) Test PeriodLack of Efficacy5
Nasojejunal (NJ) Test PeriodProtocol Violation7
Nasojejunal (NJ) Test PeriodWithdrawal by Subject12
Post-PEG-J Long-Term Treatment PeriodAdministrative13
Post-PEG-J Long-Term Treatment PeriodAdverse Event22
Post-PEG-J Long-Term Treatment PeriodLack of Efficacy2
Post-PEG-J Long-Term Treatment PeriodProtocol Violation2
Post-PEG-J Long-Term Treatment PeriodWithdrawal by Subject13

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLevodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)
Age, Continuous64.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1
Age, Customized
<65 years
171 participants
Age, Customized
>=65 years
183 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
152 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
202 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
278 / 354
serious
Total, serious adverse events
108 / 354

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Total Score at Endpoint

The AIMS is an investigator-completed rating scale that has a total of 12 items rating involuntary movements of various areas of the participant's body. Items 1 through 10 are rated on a 5-point scale of severity from 0 (none), 1 (minimal), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), to 4 (severe), and items 11 and 12 are yes/no questions regarding issues with teeth or dentures. The total AIMS score was calculated by summing items 1-10, with a possible range of 0-40; a negative change indicates improvement. The AIMS was to be performed at consistent times, when the subject was experiencing his/her worst On time (dyskinesia \[involuntary muscle movement\]).

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (last Post-PEG Long-Term Period visit up to Day 378)

Population: Post-PEG Safety Data Set: participants who continued to the PEG-J surgery, and had at least 1 post-baseline safety evaluation (only participants lost to follow-up with no post-baseline information were excluded); n=number of participants with assessment at timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Total Score at EndpointBaseline; n=3189.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.1
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Total Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint; n=317-1.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9
Primary

Number of Participants Taking at Least 1 Concomitant Medication During the Study

Concomitant medications include those started on or after the first open-label LCIG infusion as well as medications started prior to the first open-label infusion but continued during the study.

Time frame: Screening up to Day 378

Population: Safety Data Set: participants who were allocated to treatment, had started placement of NJ tube, and had at least 1 post-baseline safety evaluation (only participants lost to follow-up with no post-baseline information were excluded).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants Taking at Least 1 Concomitant Medication During the Study349 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEs

AE=any untoward medical occurrence which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that: results in death; is life-threatening (an event in which the subject was at risk of death at the time of the event); requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or other important medical events. Treatment-emergent events (TEAE or TESAE)=those starting after the first dose of study drug. Severe=severity reported as 'severe' or missing. Possibly or Probably Treatment Related=drug-event relationship reported as 'possible', 'probable' or missing. Death=a fatal outcome of an SAE or AE.

Time frame: Screening through Day 378 + 30 days

Population: Safety Data Set: participants who were allocated to treatment, had started placement of NJ tube, and had at least 1 post-baseline safety evaluation (only participants lost to follow-up with no post-baseline information were excluded).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEsDeaths8 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEsTE Deaths7 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEs>=1 SAE111 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEs>=1TESAE108 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEs>=1 TEAE Leading to Study Termination27 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEs>=1 TEAE323 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEs>=1 Severe TEAE102 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEs>=1 Possibly or Probably Treatment Related TEAE272 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEsNo TEAE31 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Confirmed Cases of Melanoma

A comprehensive assessment for the presence of melanoma was performed during the screening period and at early termination or end of study by a dermatologist experienced with the diagnosis of the condition. If a suspicious lesion was present, a biopsy was obtained for proper diagnosis.

Time frame: Screening up to Day 378

Population: Safety Data Set: participants who were allocated to treatment, had started placement of NJ tube, and had at least 1 post-baseline safety evaluation (only participants lost to follow-up with no post-baseline information were excluded).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Confirmed Cases of Melanoma0 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Device Complications During the Nasojejunal (NJ) Test Period

Complications of the infusion device were collected during the NJ Test period. Pump, intestinal tube, NJ tube, and other complications included (but were not limited to) device breakage, device leakage, device malfunction, device misuse, device occlusion, intentional and unintentional device removal by participant, complication of device insertion, device dislocation, device breakage, device dislocation, and post-procedural hemorrhage.

Time frame: NJ Test Period (from 2 to 14 days)

Population: Safety Data Set: participants who were allocated to treatment, had started placement of NJ tube, and had at least 1 post-baseline safety evaluation (only participants lost to follow-up with no post-baseline information were excluded).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Device Complications During the Nasojejunal (NJ) Test Period>=1 Complication90 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Device Complications During the Nasojejunal (NJ) Test PeriodPump Complication7 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Device Complications During the Nasojejunal (NJ) Test PeriodIntestinal Tube Complication4 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Device Complications During the Nasojejunal (NJ) Test PeriodNJ Tube Complication68 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Device Complications During the Nasojejunal (NJ) Test PeriodOther Complications25 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Device Complications During the Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy - With Jejunal Extension Tube (PEG-J) Surgery and Post-PEG Long Term Treatment Periods

Complications of the infusion device were collected during the PEG-J Surgery and Post-PEG Long-Term Treatment periods. Pump, PEG-J, stoma, and other complications included (but were not limited to) device breakage, device leakage, device malfunction, device misuse, device occlusion, intentional and unintentional device removal by participant, complication of device insertion, device dislocation, device breakage, device dislocation, and post-procedural hemorrhage.

Time frame: PEG-J Surgery Period (from 2 to 14 days) through the Long Term Treatment Period (Day 28 to Day 378)

Population: Post-PEG Safety Data Set: participants who continued to the PEG-J surgery, and had at least 1 post-baseline safety evaluation (only participants lost to follow-up with no post-baseline information were excluded).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Device Complications During the Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy - With Jejunal Extension Tube (PEG-J) Surgery and Post-PEG Long Term Treatment Periods>=1 Complication282 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Device Complications During the Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy - With Jejunal Extension Tube (PEG-J) Surgery and Post-PEG Long Term Treatment PeriodsPump Complication116 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Device Complications During the Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy - With Jejunal Extension Tube (PEG-J) Surgery and Post-PEG Long Term Treatment PeriodsIntestinal Tube Complication165 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Device Complications During the Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy - With Jejunal Extension Tube (PEG-J) Surgery and Post-PEG Long Term Treatment PeriodsPEG-J Complication114 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Device Complications During the Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy - With Jejunal Extension Tube (PEG-J) Surgery and Post-PEG Long Term Treatment PeriodsStoma Complication116 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Device Complications During the Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy - With Jejunal Extension Tube (PEG-J) Surgery and Post-PEG Long Term Treatment PeriodsOther Complication114 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters

Terms abbreviated in the table include heart rate (HR) in beats per minute (bpm), PR interval (PRI), QT interval corrected for heart rate using Bazett's formula (QTcB), and QT interval corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula (QTcF). Increase and decrease are signified by ↑ and ↓, respectively.

Time frame: Screening through Day 378

Population: Post-PEG Safety Data Set: participants who continued to the PEG-J surgery, and had at least 1 post-baseline safety evaluation (only participants lost to follow-up with no post-baseline information were excluded); n=number of participants with given assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersQTcF Interval >60 msec ↑ from BL; n=3093 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersHR <=50 and >30 bpm ↓ from BL; n=3211 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersHR >=120 and >30 bpm ↑ from BL; n=3211 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersPR Interval <120 msec; n=3216 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersPR Interval >220 msec; n=32126 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersQTcB Interval >480 msec; n=31915 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersQTcB Interval >60 msec ↑ from BL; n=3094 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) ParametersQTcF Interval >480 msec; n=3197 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry Parameters

Terms abbreviated in the table include aspartate aminotransferase (AST), upper limit of normal (ULN), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), female (f), and male (m).

Time frame: Screening through Day 378

Population: Post-PEG Safety Data Set: participants who continued to the PEG-J surgery, and had at least 1 post-baseline safety evaluation (only participants lost to follow-up with no post-baseline information were excluded); n=number of participants with assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersCholesterol >12.9 mmol/L; n=3150 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersTriglycerides >5.6 mmol/L; n=3152 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersAST >3*ULN; n=3151 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersALT >3*ULN; n=3150 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersGGT >3*ULN; n=3153 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersLDH >3*ULN; n=3150 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersAlkaline Phosphatase >400 U/L; n=3150 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersTotal Protein <45 g/L; n=3150 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersTotal Bilirubin >2*ULN; n=3150 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersCreatine Kinase >3*ULN; n=3157 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersSodium <126 mmol/L; n=3152 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersSodium >156 mmol/L; n=3152 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersPotassium <3.0 mmol/L; n=3151 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersPotassium >6.0 mmol/L; n=3151 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersCalcium <1.75 mmol/L; n=3152 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersCalcium >3.0 mmol/L; n=3150 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersBUN >10.8 mmol/L; n=774 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersCreatinine >177 mcmol/L; n=3153 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersUric Acid >500 mcmol/L (f), >590 mcmol/L (m);n=3150 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersGlucose (nonfasting) <2.78 mmol/L; n=3151 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Clinical Chemistry ParametersGlucose (nonfasting) >16.0 mmol/L; n=3151 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology Parameters

Potentially clinically significant values for red blood cells (RBCs), hemoglobin, and hematocrit are specified for females (f) and males (m) separately in the category rows.

Time frame: Screening through Day 378

Population: Post-PEG Safety Data Set: participants who continued to the PEG-J surgery, and had at least 1 post-baseline safety evaluation (only participants lost to follow-up with no post-baseline information were excluded); n=number of participants with assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersRBCs <2.0*10^12/L (f), <2.5*10^12/L (m); n=3160 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersHemoglobin <90 g/L (f), <100 g/L (m); n=3164 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersHematocrit <30% (f), <34% (m); n=31527 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersWhite Blood Cells <2.8*10^9/L; n=3163 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersWhite Blood Cells >16.0*10^9/L; n=3160 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersNeutrophils <1.2*10^9/L; n=3160 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersLymphocytes <0.75*10^9/L; n=31621 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersLymphocytes >80%; n=3160 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersPlatelet Count <95*10^9/L; n=3151 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersPlatelet Count >700*10^9/L; n=3150 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersMean Corpuscular Volume <60 fL; n=3150 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersMean Corpuscular Volume >120 fL; n=3150 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersEosinophils >10%; n=3167 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Values for Hematology ParametersMonocytes >30%; n=3160 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign Parameters

Terms abbreviated in the table include supine systolic blood pressure (SuSBP), standing systolic blood pressure (StSBP), orthostatic systolic blood pressure (OSBP), supine diastolic blood pressure (SuDBP), standing diastolic blood pressure (StDBP), orthostatic diastolic blood pressure (ODBP), supine pulse (SuP) in beats per minute (bpm), standing pulse (StP), and body temperature (Temp). Increase and decrease are signified by ↑ and ↓, respectively.

Time frame: up to 56 weeks

Population: Post-PEG Safety Data Set: participants who continued to the PEG-J surgery, and had at least 1 post-baseline safety evaluation (only participants lost to follow-up with no post-baseline information were excluded); n=number of participants with assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersStDBP <=50 and >30 mm Hg ↓ from BL; n=32412 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersODBP: ↓ >=20 mm Hg (Supine to Standing); n=32459 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersStP <=50 and >30 bpm ↓ from BL; n=3240 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersTemp >=38.3 and >1.1°C ↑ from BL; n=3222 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersSuSBP >=180 and >40 mm Hg ↑ from BL; n=3244 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersSuSBP <=90 and >30 mm Hg ↓ from BL; n=32417 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersStSBP >=180 and >40 mm Hg ↑ from BL; n=3242 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersStSBP <=90 and >30 mm Hg ↓ from BL; n=32435 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersOSBP: ↓ >=30 mm Hg (Supine to Standing); n=32480 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersSuDBP >=105 and >30 mm Hg ↑ from BL; n=3245 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersSuDBP <=50 and >30 mm Hg ↓ from BL; n=32411 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersStDBP >=105 and >30 mm Hg ↑ from BL; n=3248 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersSuP >=120 and >30 bpm ↑ from BL; n=3240 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersSuP <=50 and >30 bpm ↓ from BL; n=3241 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersStP >=120 and >30 bpm ↑ from BL; n=3240 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersWeight >=7% ↑ from BL; n=27225 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign ParametersWeight <=7% ↓ from BL; n=27279 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Sleep Attacks at Baseline

To prospectively monitor for the possible development of sleep attacks, participants were asked if they had experienced any events in which they fell asleep suddenly or unexpectedly, including while engaged in some activity (e.g., eating/drinking, speaking, or driving) or at rest, with or without any previous warning of sleepiness. Those participants who reported 1 or more sleep attacks were asked to report the number of sleep attacks they experienced, whether they experienced sleepiness or drowsiness prior to the sleep attack, whether they experienced a 'bad' outcome or problem due to a sleep attack, and if so, how many 'bad' outcomes or problems they experienced.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Post-PEG Safety Data Set: participants who continued to the PEG-J surgery, and had at least 1 post-baseline safety evaluation (only participants lost to follow-up with no post-baseline information were excluded).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Sleep Attacks at BaselineParticipants with >=1 Sleep Attacks7 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Sleep Attacks at BaselineNumber of Sleep Attacks Per Participant=14 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Sleep Attacks at BaselineNumber of Sleep Attacks Per Participant=20 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Sleep Attacks at BaselineNumber of Sleep Attacks Per Participant=30 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Sleep Attacks at BaselineNumber of Sleep Attacks Per Participant>32 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Sleep Attacks at BaselineNumber of Sleep Attacks Per Participant=Missing1 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Sleep Attacks at BaselineSleepiness/Drowsiness Prior to Sleep Attack4 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Sleep Attacks at BaselineBad Outcome/Problem Due to Sleep Attack1 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Sleep Attacks at BaselineNumber of Bad Outcomes/Problems=11 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Sleep Attacks at BaselineNumber of Bad Outcomes/Problems=20 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Sleep Attacks at BaselineNumber of Bad Outcomes/Problems=30 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Sleep Attacks at BaselineNumber of Bad Outcomes/Problems>30 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Sleep Attacks During the Post-PEG Long-Term Treatment Period

To prospectively monitor for the possible development of sleep attacks, participants were asked if they had experienced any events in which they fell asleep suddenly or unexpectedly, including while engaged in some activity (e.g., eating/drinking, speaking, or driving) or at rest, with or without any previous warning of sleepiness. Those participants who reported 1 or more sleep attacks were asked to report the number of sleep attacks they experienced, whether they experienced sleepiness or drowsiness prior to the sleep attack, whether they experienced a 'bad' outcome or problem due to a sleep attack, and if so, how many 'bad' outcomes or problems they experienced.

Time frame: During the Post-PEG Long-Term Treatment Period (Day 28 through Day 378)

Population: Post-PEG Safety Data Set: participants who continued to the PEG-J surgery, and had at least 1 post-baseline safety evaluation (only participants lost to follow-up with no post-baseline information were excluded) who had an assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Sleep Attacks During the Post-PEG Long-Term Treatment PeriodNumber of Bad Outcomes/Problems=30 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Sleep Attacks During the Post-PEG Long-Term Treatment PeriodNumber of Bad Outcomes/Problems=20 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Sleep Attacks During the Post-PEG Long-Term Treatment PeriodParticipants with >=1 Sleep Attacks27 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Sleep Attacks During the Post-PEG Long-Term Treatment PeriodNumber of Sleep Attacks Per Participant=111 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Sleep Attacks During the Post-PEG Long-Term Treatment PeriodNumber of Sleep Attacks Per Participant=22 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Sleep Attacks During the Post-PEG Long-Term Treatment PeriodNumber of Sleep Attacks Per Participant=35 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Sleep Attacks During the Post-PEG Long-Term Treatment PeriodNumber of Sleep Attacks Per Participant>39 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Sleep Attacks During the Post-PEG Long-Term Treatment PeriodSleepiness/Drowsiness Prior to Sleep Attack11 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Sleep Attacks During the Post-PEG Long-Term Treatment PeriodBad Outcome/Problem Due to Sleep Attack2 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Sleep Attacks During the Post-PEG Long-Term Treatment PeriodNumber of Bad Outcomes/Problems=12 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Number of Participants With Sleep Attacks During the Post-PEG Long-Term Treatment PeriodNumber of Bad Outcomes/Problems>30 participants
Primary

Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and During the Post-PEG Long-term Treatment (PPLT) Period

The MIDI is a validated assessment of impulsive behavior consisting of a semistructured clinical interview assessing pathological gambling, trichotillomania (compulsive hair-pulling), kleptomania (compulsive stealing), pyromania (compulsive fire setting), intermittent explosive disorder, compulsive buying, and compulsive sexual behavior.

Time frame: Baseline, during the Post-PEG Long-term Treatment Period (Day 28 through Day 378)

Population: Post-PEG Safety Data Set: participants who continued to the PEG-J surgery, and had at least 1 post-baseline safety evaluation (only participants lost to follow-up with no post-baseline information were excluded); n=number of participants with an assessment at timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and During the Post-PEG Long-term Treatment (PPLT) PeriodPPLT Trichotillomania; n=3180 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and During the Post-PEG Long-term Treatment (PPLT) PeriodPPLT Intermittent Explosive Disorder; n=3180 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and During the Post-PEG Long-term Treatment (PPLT) PeriodBL Compulsive Buying; n=3220 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and During the Post-PEG Long-term Treatment (PPLT) PeriodBL Kleptomania; n=3220 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and During the Post-PEG Long-term Treatment (PPLT) PeriodBL Trichotillomania; n=3220 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and During the Post-PEG Long-term Treatment (PPLT) PeriodBL Intermittent Explosive Disorder; n=3220 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and During the Post-PEG Long-term Treatment (PPLT) PeriodBL Pyromania; n=3220 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and During the Post-PEG Long-term Treatment (PPLT) PeriodBL Pathological Gambling; n=3222 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and During the Post-PEG Long-term Treatment (PPLT) PeriodBL Compulsive Sexual Behavior; n=3229 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and During the Post-PEG Long-term Treatment (PPLT) PeriodPPLT Compulsive Buying; n=3183 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and During the Post-PEG Long-term Treatment (PPLT) PeriodPPLT Kleptomania; n=3180 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and During the Post-PEG Long-term Treatment (PPLT) PeriodPPLT Pyromania; n=3180 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and During the Post-PEG Long-term Treatment (PPLT) PeriodPPLT Pathological Gambling; n=3186 participants
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Summary of Minnesota Impulsive Disorder Interview (MIDI) Assessment of Intense Impulsive Behavior at Baseline (BL) and During the Post-PEG Long-term Treatment (PPLT) PeriodPPLT Compulsive Sexual Behavior; n=31811 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Average Daily Normalized On Time With Troublesome Dyskinesia at Endpoint

Based on the Parkinson's Disease Symptom Diary. On time is when PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Off time is when PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. The diary is completed every 30 minutes for the full 24 hours of each of 3 days prior to selected clinic visits. It reflects both time awake and time asleep. Daily totals are normalized to a 16-hour scale (i.e. 16 hours of awake time). The normalized totals for the 3 days prior to the visit are averaged for the analysis.

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (last post-baseline visit up to Day 378)

Population: Full Analysis Data Set: participants who had at least 1 post-baseline safety evaluation, a baseline efficacy evaluation, and had data for at least 1 post-baseline assessment of this efficacy measurement during the Post-PEG Long-Term Treatment Period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Change From Baseline in Average Daily Normalized On Time With Troublesome Dyskinesia at EndpointBaseline1.60 hoursStandard Deviation 2.03
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Change From Baseline in Average Daily Normalized On Time With Troublesome Dyskinesia at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint-0.36 hoursStandard Deviation 2.77
p-value: 0.023t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Average Daily Off Time at Endpoint

Based on the Parkinson's Disease Symptom Diary. On time is when PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Off time is when PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. The diary is completed every 30 minutes for the full 24 hours of each of 3 days prior to selected clinic visits. It reflects both time awake and time asleep. Daily totals are normalized to a 16-hour scale (i.e. 16 hours of awake time). The normalized totals for the 3 days prior to the visit are averaged for the analysis. Negative change from baseline for off time indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (last post-baseline visit up to Day 378)

Population: Full Analysis Data Set: participants who had at least 1 post-baseline safety evaluation, a baseline efficacy evaluation, and had data for at least 1 post-baseline assessment of this efficacy measurement during the Post-PEG Long-Term Treatment Period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Change From Baseline in Average Daily Off Time at EndpointBaseline6.77 hoursStandard Deviation 2.37
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Change From Baseline in Average Daily Off Time at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint-4.44 hoursStandard Deviation 2.89
p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Average Daily On Time Without Troublesome Dyskinesia at Endpoint

Based on the Parkinson's Disease Symptom Diary. On time is when PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Off time is when PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. On time without troublesome dyskinesia (involuntary muscle movement) is defined as on time without dyskinesia and on time with non-troublesome dyskinesia. The diary is completed every 30 minutes for the full 24 hours of each of 3 days prior to selected clinic visits. It reflects both time awake and time asleep. Daily totals are normalized to a 16-hour scale (i.e. 16 hours of awake time). The normalized totals for the 3 days prior to the visit are averaged for the analysis. Positive change from Baseline for on time without troublesome dyskinesia indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (last post-baseline visit up to Day 378)

Population: Full Analysis Data Set: participants who had at least 1 post-baseline safety evaluation, a baseline efficacy evaluation, and had data for at least 1 post-baseline assessment of this efficacy measurement during the Post-PEG Long-Term Treatment Period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Change From Baseline in Average Daily On Time Without Troublesome Dyskinesia at EndpointBaseline4.83 hoursStandard Deviation 2.72
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Change From Baseline in Average Daily On Time Without Troublesome Dyskinesia at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint3.86 hoursStandard Deviation 4.65
p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life Scale (EQ-5D) Summary Index at Endpoint

The EQ-5D is a participant answered questionnaire scoring 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. EQ-5D health states, defined by the EQ-5D descriptive system, are converted into a single summary index by applying a formula that essentially attaches values (also called QOL weights or QOL utilities) to each of the levels in each dimension. EQ-5D Summary Index values range from -0.11 to 1.00 with positive change indicating improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (last post-baseline visit up to Day 378)

Population: Full Analysis Data Set: participants who had at least 1 post-baseline safety evaluation, a baseline efficacy evaluation, and had data for at least 1 post-baseline assessment of this efficacy measurement during the Post-PEG Long-Term Treatment Period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life Scale (EQ-5D) Summary Index at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint0.064 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.203
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life Scale (EQ-5D) Summary Index at EndpointBaseline0.588 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.195
p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life Scale (EQ-5D) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Endpoint

The EQ-5D VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a scale from 0-100 where 100 is the 'best imaginable health state' and 0 is the 'worst imaginable health state'.

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (last post-baseline visit up to Day 378)

Population: Full Analysis Data Set: participants who had at least 1 post-baseline safety evaluation, a baseline efficacy evaluation, and had data for at least 1 post-baseline assessment of this efficacy measurement during the Post-PEG Long-Term Treatment Period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life Scale (EQ-5D) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint14.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.8
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life Scale (EQ-5D) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at EndpointBaseline50.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21
p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Activities of Daily Living Domain Score at Endpoint

The PDQ-39 is a self-administered questionnaire which comprises 39 items addressing 8 domains of health in Parkinson's disease patients. The PDQ-39 Domain: Activities of Daily Living (e.g., difficulty cutting food) includes 6 questions, each answered on a 5-point scale. The domain scores are calculated by first summing the answers to the questions in the domain. The sum is divided by the highest score possible (i.e., number of answers multiplied by 4) and the quotient is multiplied by 100 to put the score on a scale from 0 to 100, where lower scores indicate a better perceived health status. Higher scores are consistently associated with the more severe symptoms of the disease such as tremor and stiffness.

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (last post-baseline visit up to Day 378)

Population: Full Analysis Data Set: participants who had at least 1 post-baseline safety evaluation, a baseline efficacy evaluation, and had data for at least 1 post-baseline assessment of this efficacy measurement during the Post-PEG Long-Term Treatment Period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Activities of Daily Living Domain Score at EndpointBaseline50.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.3
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Activities of Daily Living Domain Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint-8.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.6
p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Bodily Discomfort Domain Score at Endpoint

The PDQ-39 is a self-administered questionnaire which comprises 39 items addressing 8 domains of health in Parkinson's disease patients. The PDQ-39 Domain: Bodily Discomfort includes 3 questions, each answered on a 5-point scale. The domain scores are calculated by first summing the answers to the questions in the domain. The sum is divided by the highest score possible (i.e., number of answers multiplied by 4) and the quotient is multiplied by 100 to put the score on a scale from 0 to 100, where lower scores indicate a better perceived health status. Higher scores are consistently associated with the more severe symptoms of the disease such as tremor and stiffness.

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (last post-baseline visit up to Day 378)

Population: Full Analysis Data Set: participants who had at least 1 post-baseline safety evaluation, a baseline efficacy evaluation, and had data for at least 1 post-baseline assessment of this efficacy measurement during the Post-PEG Long-Term Treatment Period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Bodily Discomfort Domain Score at EndpointBaseline46.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.9
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Bodily Discomfort Domain Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint-5.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.4
p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Cognition Domain Score at Endpoint

The PDQ-39 is a self-administered questionnaire which comprises 39 items addressing 8 domains of health in Parkinson's disease patients. The PDQ-39 Domain: Cognition includes 4 questions, each answered on a 5-point scale. The domain scores are calculated by first summing the answers to the questions in the domain. The sum is divided by the highest score possible (i.e., number of answers multiplied by 4) and the quotient is multiplied by 100 to put the score on a scale from 0 to 100, where lower scores indicate a better perceived health status. Higher scores are consistently associated with the more severe symptoms of the disease such as tremor and stiffness.

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (last post-baseline visit up to Day 378)

Population: Full Analysis Data Set: participants who had at least 1 post-baseline safety evaluation, a baseline efficacy evaluation, and had data for at least 1 post-baseline assessment of this efficacy measurement during the Post-PEG Long-Term Treatment Period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Cognition Domain Score at EndpointBaseline27.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.6
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Cognition Domain Score at EndpointChange from Baseline to Endpoint-4.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18
p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Communication Domain Score at Endpoint

The PDQ-39 is a self-administered questionnaire which comprises 39 items addressing 8 domains of health in Parkinson's disease patients. The PDQ-39 Domain: Communication includes 3 questions, each answered on a 5-point scale. The domain scores are calculated by first summing the answers to the questions in the domain. The sum is divided by the highest score possible (i.e., number of answers multiplied by 4) and the quotient is multiplied by 100 to put the score on a scale from 0 to 100, where lower scores indicate a better perceived health status. Higher scores are consistently associated with the more severe symptoms of the disease such as tremor and stiffness.

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (last post-baseline visit up to Day 378)

Population: Full Analysis Data Set: participants who had at least 1 post-baseline safety evaluation, a baseline efficacy evaluation, and had data for at least 1 post-baseline assessment of this efficacy measurement during the Post-PEG Long-Term Treatment Period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Communication Domain Score at EndpointBaseline34.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.4
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Communication Domain Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint-3.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.4
p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Emotional Well-Being Domain Score at Endpoint

The PDQ-39 is a self-administered questionnaire which comprises 39 items addressing 8 domains of health in Parkinson's disease patients. The PDQ-39 Domain: Emotional Well-being (e.g., feelings of isolation) includes 6 questions, each answered on a 5-point scale. The domain scores are calculated by first summing the answers to the questions in the domain. The sum is divided by the highest score possible (i.e., number of answers multiplied by 4) and the quotient is multiplied by 100 to put the score on a scale from 0 to 100, where lower scores indicate a better perceived health status. Higher scores are consistently associated with the more severe symptoms of the disease such as tremor and stiffness.

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (last post-baseline visit up to Day 378)

Population: Full Analysis Data Set: participants who had at least 1 post-baseline safety evaluation, a baseline efficacy evaluation, and had data for at least 1 post-baseline assessment of this efficacy measurement during the Post-PEG Long-Term Treatment Period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Emotional Well-Being Domain Score at EndpointBaseline39.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.8
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Emotional Well-Being Domain Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint-4.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.7
p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Mobility Domain Score at Endpoint

The PDQ-39 is a self-administered questionnaire which comprises 39 items addressing 8 domains of health in Parkinson's disease patients. The PDQ-39 Domain: Mobility (e.g., fear of falling when walking) includes 10 questions, each answered on a 5-point scale. The domain scores are calculated by first summing the answers to the questions in the domain. The sum is divided by the highest score possible (i.e., number of answers multiplied by 4) and the quotient is multiplied by 100 to put the score on a scale from 0 to 100, where lower scores indicate a better perceived health status. Higher scores are consistently associated with the more severe symptoms of the disease such as tremor and stiffness.

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (last post-baseline visit up to Day 378)

Population: Full Analysis Data Set: participants who had at least 1 post-baseline safety evaluation, a baseline efficacy evaluation, and had data for at least 1 post-baseline assessment of this efficacy measurement during the Post-PEG Long-Term Treatment Period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Mobility Domain Score at EndpointBaseline58.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.8
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Mobility Domain Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint-11.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.4
p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Social Support Domain Score at Endpoint

The PDQ-39 is a self-administered questionnaire which comprises 39 items addressing 8 domains of health in Parkinson's disease patients. The PDQ-39 Domain: Social Support includes 3 questions, each answered on a 5-point scale. The domain scores are calculated by first summing the answers to the questions in the domain. The sum is divided by the highest score possible (i.e., number of answers multiplied by 4) and the quotient is multiplied by 100 to put the score on a scale from 0 to 100, where lower scores indicate a better perceived health status. Higher scores are consistently associated with the more severe symptoms of the disease such as tremor and stiffness.

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (last post-baseline visit up to Day 378)

Population: Full Analysis Data Set: participants who had at least 1 post-baseline safety evaluation, a baseline efficacy evaluation, and had data for at least 1 post-baseline assessment of this efficacy measurement during the Post-PEG Long-Term Treatment Period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Social Support Domain Score at EndpointBaseline17.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.7
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Social Support Domain Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.9
p-value: 0.757t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Stigma Domain Score at Endpoint

The PDQ-39 is a self-administered questionnaire which comprises 39 items addressing 8 domains of health in Parkinson's disease patients. The PDQ-39 Domain: Stigma (e.g., social embarrassment) consists of 4 questions, each answered on a 5-point scale. The domain scores are calculated by first summing the answers to the questions in the domain. The sum is divided by the highest score possible (i.e., number of answers multiplied by 4) and the quotient is multiplied by 100 to put the score on a scale from 0 to 100, where lower scores indicate a better perceived health status. Higher scores are consistently associated with the more severe symptoms of the disease such as tremor and stiffness.

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (last post-baseline visit up to Day 378)

Population: Full Analysis Data Set: participants who had at least 1 post-baseline safety evaluation, a baseline efficacy evaluation, and had data for at least 1 post-baseline assessment of this efficacy measurement during the Post-PEG Long-Term Treatment Period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Stigma Domain Score at EndpointCHange from Baseline at Endpoint-9.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.1
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Stigma Domain Score at EndpointBaseline32.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26
p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Summary Index at Endpoint

The PDQ-39 is a self-administered questionnaire which comprises 39 items addressing 8 domains of health in Parkinson's disease patients. These include: mobility, activities of daily living, emotional well-being, stigma, social support, cognition, communication, and bodily discomfort. The PDQ-39 Summary Index is the sum of all answers divided by the highest score possible (i.e. number of answers multiplied by 4) which is multiplied by 100 to put the score on a 0-100 scale. Higher scores are associated with more severe symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (last post-baseline visit up to Day 378)

Population: Full Analysis Data Set: participants who had at least 1 post-baseline safety evaluation, a baseline efficacy evaluation, and had data for at least 1 post-baseline assessment of this efficacy measurement during the Post-PEG Long-Term Treatment Period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Summary Index at EndpointBaseline42.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Summary Index at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint-6.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.1
p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Score at Endpoint

The UPDRS is an Investigator-used rating tool to follow the longitudinal course of Parkinson's disease. The Part III score is the sum of the 27 answers provided to the 14 Part III questions, each of which are measured on a 5-point scale (0-4). The Part III score ranges from 0-108 and higher scores are associated with more disability.

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (last post-baseline visit up to Day 378)

Population: Full Analysis Data Set: participants who had at least 1 post-baseline safety evaluation, a baseline efficacy evaluation, and had data for at least 1 post-baseline assessment of this efficacy measurement during the Post-PEG Long-Term Treatment Period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Score at EndpointBaseline28.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.7
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint-7.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.2
p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part II Score at Endpoint

The UPDRS is an Investigator-used rating tool to follow the longitudinal course of Parkinson's disease. The Part II score is the sum of the answers to the 13 questions that comprise Part II, each of which are measured on a 5-point scale (0-4). The Part II score ranges from 0-52 and higher scores are associated with more disability.

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (last post-baseline visit up to Day 378)

Population: Full Analysis Data Set: participants who had at least 1 post-baseline safety evaluation, a baseline efficacy evaluation, and had data for at least 1 post-baseline assessment of this efficacy measurement during the Post-PEG Long-Term Treatment Period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part II Score at EndpointBaseline17.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.7
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part II Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint-4.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.5
p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part I Score at Month 12

The UPDRS is an Investigator-used rating tool to follow the longitudinal course of Parkinson's disease. The Part I Score is the sum of the answers to the 4 questions that comprise Part I, each of which are measured on a 5-point scale (0-4). The Part I score ranges from 0-16 and higher scores are associated with more disability.

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (last post-baseline visit up to Day 378)

Population: Full Analysis Data Set: participants who had at least 1 post-baseline safety evaluation, a baseline efficacy evaluation, and had data for at least 1 post-baseline assessment of this efficacy measurement during the Post-PEG Long-Term Treatment Period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part I Score at Month 12Baseline2.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part I Score at Month 12Change from Baseline at Endpoint0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
p-value: 0.974t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part IV Score at Endpoint

The UPDRS is an Investigator-used rating tool to follow the longitudinal course of Parkinson's disease. The Part IV Score is the sum of the answers to the 11 questions that comprise Part IV, each of which are measured on a 5-point scale (0-4) or a 2-point scale (0 or 1). The Part IV score ranges from 0-23 and higher scores are associated with more disability.

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (last post-baseline visit up to Day 378)

Population: Full Analysis Data Set: participants who had at least 1 post-baseline safety evaluation, a baseline efficacy evaluation, and had data for at least 1 post-baseline assessment of this efficacy measurement during the Post-PEG Long-Term Treatment Period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part IV Score at EndpointBaseline9.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part IV Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint-3.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Total Score at Endpoint

The UPDRS is an Investigator-used rating tool to follow the longitudinal course of Parkinson's disease. The total score is the sum of the responses to the 31 questions (44 answers) that comprise Parts I-III of the scale. The total score will range from 0-176, with 176 representing the worst (total) disability, and 0 representing no disability.

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (last post-baseline visit up to Day 378)

Population: Full Analysis Data Set: participants who had at least 1 post-baseline safety evaluation, a baseline efficacy evaluation, and had data for at least 1 post-baseline assessment of this efficacy measurement during the Post-PEG Long-Term Treatment Period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Total Score at EndpointBaseline48.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.9
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Total Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint-11.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.3
p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) Total Score at Endpoint

The ZBI is a 22-item questionnaire regarding the caregiver/subject relationship and evaluates the caregiver's health condition, psychological well-being, finances and social life. Each question is answered on a 5-point scale (0=never, 1=rarely, 2=sometimes, 3=quite frequently, and 4=nearly always). The caregiver burden is evaluated by the total score (Range 0 to 88) obtained from the sum of the answers to the 22 questions. Higher scores are associated with a higher level of burden for the caregiver.

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (last post-baseline visit up to Day 378)

Population: Full Analysis Data Set: participants who had at least 1 post-baseline safety evaluation, a baseline efficacy evaluation, and had data for at least 1 post-baseline assessment of this efficacy measurement during the Post-PEG Long-Term Treatment Period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Change From Baseline in Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) Total Score at EndpointChange from Baseline at Endpoint0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.8
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Change From Baseline in Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) Total Score at EndpointBaseline27.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.2
p-value: 0.824t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Clinical Global Impression - Status (CGI-S) Score at Baseline and Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Score at Endpoint

The CGI-S is a global assessment by the Investigator of current symptomatology and impact of illness on functioning. The ratings of the CGI-S are as follows: 1 = normal, 2 = borderline ill, 3 = mildly ill, 4 = moderately ill, 5 = markedly ill, 6 = severely ill, and 7 = among the most extremely ill. The CGI-I is a global assessment by the Investigator of the change in clinical status since the start of treatment. The CGI-I ratings are as follows: 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, 7 = very much worse.

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (last post-baseline visit up to Day 378)

Population: Full Analysis Data Set: participants who had at least 1 post-baseline safety evaluation, a baseline efficacy evaluation, and had data for at least 1 post-baseline assessment of this efficacy measurement during the Post-PEG Long-Term Treatment Period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Clinical Global Impression - Status (CGI-S) Score at Baseline and Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Score at EndpointCGI-S Baseline4.85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.84
Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG)Clinical Global Impression - Status (CGI-S) Score at Baseline and Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Score at EndpointCGI-I at Endpoint2.10 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.95
p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 12, 2026