Skip to content

Predictors of Response to Cognitive Remediation in Schizophrenia

Predictors of Response to Cognitive Remediation in Schizophrenia

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00333970
Enrollment
103
Registered
2006-06-06
Start date
2004-08-31
Completion date
2014-07-31
Last updated
2014-10-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Schizophrenia

Keywords

cognition, neuropsychology, Rehabilitation, treatment efficacy, cognitive remediation

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine which variables predict improvement on a cognitive training task battery, used for patients with schizophrenia, and to determine the proportion of patients whose performance returns to normal following cognitive training

Detailed description

It has been suggested that level of cognitive function is a rate-limiter for the efficacy of other psychosocial treatments in schizophrenia. Cognitive remediation, which entails training and practice of successively more difficult cognitive exercises, has shown efficacy in improving cognitive function. However, the rate of improvement has not been uniform among patients receiving this intervention. Given the time- and cost-intensiveness of cognitive remediation, it is important to examine variables that will predict response to this treatment, as well as to examine the clinical significance of any improvement. The current proposal has two aims: 1) to determine which neuropsychological, demographic, and illness variables predict response to cognitive remediation training; and 2) to determine the proportion of patients whose performance returns to normal following cognitive remediation training. For the first part of the proposed study, 50 outpatients diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorders will be invited to participate in an 8-week trial of cognitive remediation training. Detailed neuropsychological, demographic, symptom and illness course variables will be collected prior to training, at the conclusion of training, and 4 months from study intake. In order to answer the second question, additional data on the computerized task performance for healthy controls will be collected, and compared to patient data, in order to determine what constitutes normal-range performance

Interventions

BEHAVIORALcognitive remediation

individual cognitive training

Sponsors

US Department of Veterans Affairs
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of schizophrenia spectrum disorder * English speakers * Clinically stable * No substance abuse in past 30 days

Exclusion criteria

* Traumatic brain injury * Neurological disease * Diagnosis of mental retardation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cognitive Performancebaseline and 2 monthsChange in verbal memory scores from baseline to end of active phase (2 months), measured as trials 1-5 total score on the California Verbal Learning Test -II (range 0-80, higher scores represent better performance).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

103 participants were enrolled. Of those, 75 were found eligible, completed baseline assessments and were then randomized to either Arm 1 (n=50) or Arm 2 (n=25). The remaining 28 participants were either discontinued from the study by the PI or chose to withdraw prior to randomization.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm 1
cognitive remediation cognitive remediation: individual cognitive training
50
Arm 2
treatment as usual
25
Total75

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject137

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm 1Arm 2Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
50 Participants25 Participants75 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants9 Participants19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
40 Participants16 Participants56 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 505 / 50
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 502 / 25

Outcome results

Primary

Cognitive Performance

Change in verbal memory scores from baseline to end of active phase (2 months), measured as trials 1-5 total score on the California Verbal Learning Test -II (range 0-80, higher scores represent better performance).

Time frame: baseline and 2 months

Population: individuals who were randomized and completed 2 month assessments

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1Cognitive Performance4.97 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.38
Arm 2Cognitive Performance-2.30 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.98

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026